Oklahoma sooners football vs texas longhorns football match player stats
The Oklahoma Sooners delivered a remarkable fourth-quarter comeback to defeat the Texas Longhorns 27-24 on October 11, 2026. The oklahoma sooners football vs texas longhorns football match player stats reveal how a game that appeared to be slipping away from Oklahoma turned into one of the most dramatic finishes of the season. Texas entered the final quarter with a 24-10 advantage, but Oklahoma scored 17 unanswered points to secure the victory.
The matchup featured an impressive passing performance from Texas quarterback Arch Manning, an important rushing contribution from Oklahoma’s Lloyd Avant, and a game-changing defensive touchdown by Peyton Bowen. Although Texas produced more passing yards and three passing touchdowns, Oklahoma made better use of its defensive opportunities and delivered when the game was on the line.
The final score was Oklahoma 27, Texas 24. The result reflected more than offensive production. It highlighted the importance of turnovers, defensive execution, special teams, and fourth-quarter composure in a closely contested college football rivalry.
This detailed breakdown examines the individual performances, quarterback statistics, rushing and receiving production, defensive contributions, kicking numbers, and important moments that determined the outcome.
Oklahoma vs Texas Game Overview
The October 11 meeting between Oklahoma and Texas provided another memorable chapter in their historic college football rivalry. Both programs entered the contest looking to strengthen their position in the SEC, making the result especially important.
Texas appeared to have control of the game through three quarters. The Longhorns scored 17 points in the first half and added another seven in the second quarter’s scoring sequence before holding Oklahoma to just three points in the third quarter.
However, Oklahoma completely changed the momentum in the final 15 minutes.
FINAL SCORE: OKLAHOMA 27, TEXAS 24
| Game Information | Details |
| Matchup | Oklahoma Sooners vs Texas Longhorns |
| Sport | NCAA Football |
| Date | October 11, 2026 |
| Week | Week 7 |
| Venue | Not specified in the supplied box-score data |
| Final Result | Oklahoma 27, Texas 24 |
| Texas Record | 4-1 overall, 1-1 SEC |
| Oklahoma Record | 3-2 overall, 1-1 SEC |
| ESPN Game ID | 401856717 |
| Game Status | Final |
Final Score by Quarter
The scoring progression explains why the fourth quarter became the defining part of the matchup.
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
| Texas Longhorns | 7 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 24 |
| Oklahoma Sooners | 0 | 7 | 3 | 17 | 27 |
Texas scored in the opening quarter and built a 17-point first-half performance. Oklahoma responded with seven points in the second quarter but struggled to generate consistent offensive production.
The third quarter remained difficult for both offenses. Texas failed to score, while Oklahoma managed only a field goal.
The fourth quarter completely changed the story. Oklahoma scored 17 points, turning a 14-point deficit into a three-point victory. That late scoring burst was the biggest difference between the teams.
Oklahoma Sooners Football vs Texas Longhorns Football Match Player Stats
The individual numbers provide a clearer understanding of how both teams approached the contest.
Texas produced 260 passing yards and three passing touchdowns through Arch Manning. Oklahoma quarterback John Mateer completed 18 of 26 passes for 155 yards without throwing a touchdown or interception.
The Sooners compensated for their lower passing production through rushing contributions, defensive takeaways, and timely scoring.
| Statistical Category | Oklahoma | Texas |
| Final Score | 27 | 24 |
| Passing Yards | 155 | 260 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 | 3 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 2 |
| Rushing Attempts | 31 | 32 |
| Rushing Yards | 83 | 122 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Receptions | 18 | 19 |
| Receiving Yards | 155 | 260 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 0 | 3 |
| Sacks Recorded | 2 | 3 |
| Interceptions Recorded | 2 | 0 |
| Field Goals Made | 2 | 1 |
| Extra Points Made | 3 | 3 |
One important detail stands out: Texas produced more passing and rushing yardage, but Oklahoma scored more points.
The Sooners also recorded two interceptions, including a defensive touchdown. Those plays helped offset the Longhorns’ stronger passing production.
These figures show why total yardage alone cannot explain the result. The timing and value of individual plays were more important than simply accumulating offensive statistics.
Quarterback Performance: Arch Manning vs John Mateer
Quarterback performance was one of the most interesting aspects of this rivalry game. Arch Manning delivered the stronger passing numbers, but John Mateer protected the football and helped Oklahoma remain competitive.
Both quarterbacks had different responsibilities within their respective offensive systems. Manning was responsible for generating explosive passing plays, while Mateer had to manage an offense that struggled to find consistent yardage through the air.
Arch Manning’s Passing Statistics
Texas Longhorns football: Arch Manning gets his first start
Arch Manning (#16)
260 yards
19 completions on 31 attempts
3 passing touchdowns
| Passing Statistic | Performance |
| Completions | 19 |
| Attempts | 31 |
| Completion Percentage | 61.3% |
| Passing Yards | 260 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.4 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| QBR | 72.0 |
Manning completed 19 of his 31 passing attempts, producing 260 yards and three touchdowns. His 8.4 yards per attempt demonstrated that Texas could generate meaningful gains through the passing game.
His performance was particularly effective when connecting with Cam Coleman and Ryan Wingo. Both receivers produced explosive plays and helped Texas maintain offensive momentum.
However, two interceptions became a major problem.
Throwing three touchdown passes is normally a strong foundation for winning a college football game. Unfortunately for Texas, those positive plays were partly offset by turnovers that gave Oklahoma opportunities to change the scoreboard.
The important distinction is that Manning’s passing production was not the same as consistent game control. His numbers were impressive, but the turnovers made the offense less reliable during critical moments.
John Mateer’s Passing Statistics
John Mateer (#10)
155 yards
18 completions on 26 attempts
Zero interceptions
| Passing Statistic | Performance |
| Completions | 18 |
| Attempts | 26 |
| Completion Percentage | 69.2% |
| Passing Yards | 155 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 6.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| QBR | 53.4 |
Mateer completed 69.2% of his passes, giving him a better completion percentage than Manning. However, his passing production was considerably lower.
He finished with 155 yards and no passing touchdowns. His six yards per attempt indicate that Oklahoma did not consistently create the same downfield opportunities as Texas.
One of the most valuable aspects of his performance was ball security. Mateer did not throw an interception, which helped Oklahoma avoid giving Texas additional possessions through passing turnovers.
He also attempted 12 rushes, although those carries resulted in minus-six yards. This suggests that his rushing involvement did not produce the expected positive yardage.
His performance should therefore be evaluated through the overall result rather than passing statistics alone. Oklahoma won despite receiving considerably less passing production from its quarterback.
Quarterback Comparison
| Category | Arch Manning | John Mateer |
| Completions | 19 | 18 |
| Attempts | 31 | 26 |
| Completion Rate | 61.3% | 69.2% |
| Passing Yards | 260 | 155 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.4 | 6.0 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 0 |
| QBR | 72.0 | 53.4 |
Who had the better individual performance?
Manning had the better statistical passing performance. He generated 105 more passing yards and threw three touchdown passes.
Mateer, however, had the advantage in completion percentage and interceptions. His ability to avoid throwing an interception was important in a game decided by only three points.
The comparison illustrates two different quarterback performances. Manning produced more explosive offensive results, while Mateer avoided the passing mistakes that could have made Oklahoma’s comeback even more difficult.
Rushing Statistics and Ground Game Analysis
The rushing game was another important part of the contest. Both teams recorded almost identical rushing attempt totals, with Texas carrying the football 32 times and Oklahoma recording 31 attempts.
Texas finished with 122 rushing yards, compared with Oklahoma’s 83.
Although Texas produced more rushing yardage overall, Oklahoma received an important contribution from Lloyd Avant, who scored the Sooners’ listed rushing touchdown.
Oklahoma Sooners Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Lloyd Avant | 10 | 72 | 7.2 | 1 | 42 |
| Hollywood Smothers | 12 | 39 | 3.3 | 0 | 14 |
| Raleek Brown | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 0 | 7 |
| Jonathan Hatton Jr. | 5 | 12 | 2.4 | 0 | 6 |
| Tory Blaylock | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 4 |
| Isaiah Sategna III | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Mateer | 12 | -6 | -0.5 | 0 | 8 |
The individual rushing numbers show that Avant was Oklahoma’s most productive runner.
Lloyd Avant’s Impact
2026 Oklahoma Spring Football Game
Lloyd Avant (#9)
72 rushing yards
10 carries, 7.2 yards per carry
1 rushing touchdown
Avant delivered one of Oklahoma’s most effective offensive performances. He gained 72 yards on only 10 attempts, averaging 7.2 yards per carry.
His longest run covered 42 yards, demonstrating his ability to create significant yardage with a single carry.
The difference between Avant and the rest of Oklahoma’s rushing production is worth examining. He accounted for most of the team’s 83 rushing yards, making his contribution especially valuable.
His touchdown also gave Oklahoma a scoring option beyond its passing game.
When a quarterback is unable to generate passing touchdowns, a productive running back can become an important part of the scoring strategy. Avant provided exactly that contribution.
Hollywood Smothers’ Contribution
Hollywood Smothers recorded 12 rushing attempts for 39 yards, averaging 3.3 yards per carry.
His workload was the largest among Oklahoma’s listed running backs. Although he did not produce the same average as Avant, his involvement provided the offense with another rushing option.
Smothers also recorded two receptions for 19 yards. His contribution was therefore not limited to carries.
The combination of rushing and receiving involvement made him a useful part of Oklahoma’s offensive distribution.
Texas Longhorns Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Derrek Cooper | 8 | 41 | 5.1 | 0 | 16 |
| Hollywood Smothers | 12 | 39 | 3.3 | 0 | 14 |
| Raleek Brown | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 0 | 7 |
| Arch Manning | 7 | 20 | 2.9 | 0 | 12 |
The supplied statistics list Derrek Cooper as Texas’s leading rusher. He gained 41 yards on eight carries, averaging 5.1 yards per attempt.
His production was efficient, although he did not score a rushing touchdown.
Manning also contributed 20 rushing yards on seven carries. His rushing involvement gave Oklahoma another responsibility to consider when defending the Texas offense.
Derrek Cooper’s Performance
Derrek Cooper (#5)
41 rushing yards
8 carries, 5.1 yards per carry
Longest run: 16 yards
Cooper was Texas’s most productive listed ball carrier. His 5.1-yard average showed that he was capable of gaining positive yardage without requiring a large number of attempts.
However, Texas did not record a rushing touchdown.
This was a significant difference between the teams. Oklahoma received a rushing touchdown from Avant, while Texas depended on its passing game for its listed offensive touchdowns.
Team Rushing Comparison
| Statistic | Oklahoma | Texas |
| Rushing Attempts | 31 | 32 |
| Rushing Yards | 83 | 122 |
| Average Per Carry | 2.7 | 3.8 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Longest Run | 42 yards | 16 yards |
Texas had the advantage in total rushing yards and average yards per carry. Oklahoma, however, produced the more important scoring contribution through its ground game.
The 42-yard run by Avant was particularly valuable because it provided an explosive play that Texas did not match in its listed rushing statistics.
Receiving Statistics: Cam Coleman Leads Texas
The receiving battle strongly favored Texas in terms of total production.
The Longhorns recorded 260 receiving yards and three receiving touchdowns. Oklahoma finished with 155 receiving yards and no receiving touchdowns.
Cam Coleman was Texas’s leading receiver, while Isaiah Sategna III led Oklahoma.
Texas Longhorns Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Cam Coleman | 5 | 110 | 22.0 | 1 | 42 |
| Ryan Wingo | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 1 | 34 |
| Emmett Mosley V | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 0 | 15 |
| Hollywood Smothers | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 0 | 16 |
| Nick Townsend | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 0 | 9 |
| Jermaine Bishop Jr. | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 1 | 15 |
| Raleek Brown | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 | 0 |
Cam Coleman’s Outstanding Performance
Five transfers most likely to impact the College Football Playoff race in 2026
Cam Coleman (#8)
110 yards
5 receptions, 22.0 yards per catch
1 receiving touchdown
Coleman was the most productive receiver in the game.
He caught five passes for 110 yards and one touchdown. His 22-yard average per reception was an indication of his ability to create substantial gains downfield.
His longest reception covered 42 yards.
Coleman’s contribution helped Texas establish its passing advantage. He was also one of the main reasons Manning finished with 260 passing yards.
From an individual perspective, Coleman delivered an outstanding performance. His five receptions represented a manageable workload, but his average of 22 yards per catch made each successful connection valuable.
Ryan Wingo’s Explosive Receiving Production
Ryan Wingo recorded two receptions for 57 yards and one touchdown.
His 28.5 yards per reception was the highest among the listed Texas receivers.
Wingo’s longest reception covered 34 yards, demonstrating that he was another important downfield target for Manning.
His contribution also shows that Texas did not depend on Coleman alone. The offense had multiple receivers capable of creating explosive plays.
Other Texas Receiving Contributors
Emmett Mosley V caught five passes for 43 yards. His reception total matched Coleman’s, although his average was lower at 8.6 yards per catch.
Hollywood Smothers added two receptions for 19 yards, while Nick Townsend recorded three catches for 18 yards.
Jermaine Bishop Jr. had one reception for 15 yards, which resulted in a touchdown.
The distribution of touchdowns across Coleman, Wingo, and Bishop demonstrates that Manning successfully connected with different receiving options.
Oklahoma Sooners Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Isaiah Sategna III | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 0 | 20 |
| Rocky Beers | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 0 | 14 |
| Lloyd Avant | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| Elijah Thomas | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 |
| Hayden Hansen | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 |
| Manny Choice | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 0 | 6 |
| Tory Blaylock | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 8 |
| Jonathan Hatton Jr. | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
Isaiah Sategna III Leads Oklahoma
Isaiah Sategna III (#1)
64 yards
5 receptions, 12.8 yards per catch
Longest reception: 20 yards
Sategna was Oklahoma’s leading receiver with five receptions for 64 yards.
His average of 12.8 yards per reception gave the Sooners a useful receiving contribution, even though he did not record a touchdown.
He also appeared in the rushing statistics with one carry for minus-one yard.
His involvement in both areas highlights the variety of ways Oklahoma used its offensive personnel.
Rocky Beers Provides Additional Support
Rocky Beers finished with four receptions for 29 yards.
Although he did not produce a touchdown or a particularly large individual total, his four catches helped distribute the passing workload.
Lloyd Avant also contributed as a receiver, recording two receptions for 16 yards in addition to his 72 rushing yards.
This dual contribution made Avant particularly important to Oklahoma’s offensive production.
Team Receiving Comparison
| Receiving Statistic | Oklahoma | Texas |
| Receptions | 18 | 19 |
| Receiving Yards | 155 | 260 |
| Average Per Catch | 8.6 | 13.7 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 0 | 3 |
| Longest Reception | 20 yards | 42 yards |
Texas had the clear advantage in receiving production.
The Longhorns gained 105 more receiving yards and recorded three touchdowns through their receivers.
However, the scoreboard tells a different story about overall team success. Oklahoma’s defensive performance and fourth-quarter scoring allowed the Sooners to overcome that statistical disadvantage.
Defensive Player Stats: The Biggest Difference in the Game
Defense played a decisive role in Oklahoma’s comeback. Texas generated more offensive yardage, but the Sooners created turnovers that directly influenced the final result.
Oklahoma recorded two interceptions, including a 42-yard interception return for a touchdown by Peyton Bowen. That defensive score was one of the most important individual plays of the contest.
Oklahoma Defensive Statistics
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | Passes Defended |
| Owen Heinecke | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Peyton Bowen | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trystan Haynes | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Courtland Guillory | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Reggie Powers III | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The five players above represent important individual contributions, but they were not the only defenders involved in Oklahoma’s performance.
The Sooners recorded 71 total tackles, 33 solo tackles, two sacks, five tackles for loss, and five passes defended.
They also recorded two interceptions and two defensive touchdowns in the supplied team statistics. The individual interception details specifically identify one touchdown return by Bowen.
Peyton Bowen’s Game-Changing Interception
Peyton Bowen
42 yards
Interception return distance
Defensive touchdown
Bowen produced one of the most valuable defensive performances of the matchup.
His interception return covered 42 yards and resulted in a touchdown. This was more than an ordinary defensive takeaway because the play directly added points to Oklahoma’s scoreboard.
A defensive touchdown can change the momentum of a rivalry game immediately. It rewards defensive pressure, creates an emotional boost for the entire team, and forces the opposing offense to reconsider its approach.
Bowen also recorded seven total tackles, including six solo tackles.
His performance demonstrated that he contributed beyond the interception itself. He was involved in the defensive effort throughout the contest.
Owen Heinecke’s Tackling Performance
Owen Heinecke led Oklahoma’s listed defenders with nine total tackles.
He also recorded 2.5 tackles for loss, making him one of the team’s most productive defenders behind the line of scrimmage.
Tackles for loss are particularly valuable because they disrupt offensive rhythm. When a defender stops a ball carrier behind the line, the offense faces a more difficult down-and-distance situation.
Heinecke’s numbers therefore represent an important contribution to Oklahoma’s defensive effort.
Courtland Guillory’s Interception
Courtland Guillory recorded six tackles and one pass defended.
He also intercepted a pass, giving Oklahoma its second listed interception of the game.
Unlike Bowen, Guillory did not return his interception for a touchdown. However, the takeaway still prevented Texas from continuing that possession and provided Oklahoma with another defensive success.
Texas Longhorns Defensive Statistics
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | Passes Defended |
| Rasheem Biles | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Jelani McDonald | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hero Kanu | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Maraad Watson | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Colin Simmons | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Derek Williams Jr. | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Justin Cryer | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Graceson Littleton | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Brad Spence | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lance Jackson | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 |
Texas had several productive defensive players despite losing the game.
Rasheem Biles led the listed Longhorn defenders with 12 total tackles. His two tackles for loss and one pass defended demonstrated his involvement in multiple defensive situations.
Colin Simmons also produced an impressive pass-rushing performance.
Colin Simmons’ Two-Sack Performance
Simmons recorded:
- Four total tackles.
- Three solo tackles.
- Two sacks.
- Three tackles for loss.
His three tackles for loss were particularly notable. He consistently found ways to disrupt Oklahoma’s offensive plays behind the line of scrimmage.
Maraad Watson also recorded a sack, giving Texas another important pass-rushing contribution.
The Longhorns finished with three team sacks and nine tackles for loss.
These numbers show that Texas had success creating pressure and disrupting Oklahoma’s offense. However, the defense could not prevent the Sooners from scoring 17 points in the fourth quarter.
Team Defensive Comparison
| Defensive Category | Oklahoma | Texas |
| Total Tackles | 71 | 62 |
| Solo Tackles | 33 | 26 |
| Sacks | 2 | 3 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 | 9 |
| Passes Defended | 5 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
Texas had more sacks and tackles for loss, suggesting that its defensive front created more disruption in the backfield.
Oklahoma, however, had the more valuable turnover production.
The difference between two interceptions and zero interceptions was significant in a three-point game.
A defense does not need to dominate every statistical category to influence the result. Sometimes one or two high-impact plays are more valuable than several additional tackles or sacks.
Turnovers and Their Influence on the Final Result
Turnovers were among the most important factors in this matchup.
Texas quarterback Arch Manning threw two interceptions, while Oklahoma quarterback John Mateer did not throw any.
The supplied statistics identify the following plays:
| Team | Player | Turnover | Return Yards | Touchdown |
| Oklahoma | Peyton Bowen | Interception | 42 | 1 |
| Oklahoma | Courtland Guillory | Interception | 0 | 0 |
| Texas | None recorded | None | 0 | 0 |
Oklahoma finished with two interceptions and 42 interception-return yards.
Texas did not record an interception.
The difference was especially important because Oklahoma did not have a major passing advantage. Its offense gained only 155 passing yards, so the defense needed to contribute in other ways.
Bowen’s touchdown return provided an immediate scoring benefit. Guillory’s interception added another possession-changing defensive play.
Fumbles and Ball Security
The fumble statistics were relatively limited.
- Texas recorded no fumbles.
- John Mateer recorded one fumble.
- Oklahoma lost zero fumbles.
Although Mateer was credited with a fumble, Oklahoma recovered it and did not lose possession.
This distinction matters because not every fumble results in a turnover. A team can record a fumble without giving the football to its opponent.
Texas avoided recorded fumbles, but its two interceptions created a more significant problem.
Overall, Oklahoma had the advantage in the most important turnover category: interceptions.
Special Teams Performance: Tate Sandell vs Gianni Spetic
Special teams provided another important difference between the two programs.
Oklahoma kicker Tate Sandell scored nine points, while Texas kicker Gianni Spetic finished with six points.
The difference came from field-goal production.
Oklahoma Kicking Statistics
| Statistic | Tate Sandell |
| Field Goals Made | 2 |
| Field Goal Attempts | 3 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 66.7% |
| Longest Field Goal | 53 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 3 |
| Total Points | 9 |
Sandell made two of his three field-goal attempts.
His longest successful kick covered 53 yards, an important achievement that demonstrated his ability to convert from long distance.
He also converted all three extra-point attempts.
His nine total points represented a valuable contribution in a game Oklahoma won by three points.
Texas Kicking Statistics
| Statistic | Gianni Spetic |
| Field Goals Made | 1 |
| Field Goal Attempts | 2 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 50.0% |
| Longest Field Goal | 23 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 3 |
| Total Points | 6 |
Spetic made one of two field-goal attempts and converted all three extra points.
His six points contributed to Texas’s scoring total, but the Longhorns did not receive the same field-goal production as Oklahoma.
The comparison shows a three-point advantage for Sandell in total kicking points.
That difference matches the final winning margin, although it should not be interpreted as the sole reason Oklahoma won.
The defensive touchdown and fourth-quarter offensive production were also critical.
Punting and Return Statistics
Punting was another important part of the special teams battle.
Both teams relied heavily on their punters, reflecting the difficulty of maintaining consistent offensive drives.
Punting Comparison
| Statistic | Oklahoma | Texas |
| Punter | Jacob Ulrich | Mac Chiumento |
| Punts | 9 | 8 |
| Punting Yards | 374 | 292 |
| Average Listed | 41.6 | 36.5 |
| Touchbacks | 0 | 0 |
| Inside 20 | 2 | 3 |
| Longest Punt | 56 yards | 51 yards |
Jacob Ulrich recorded nine punts for Oklahoma, totaling 374 yards.
His average was 41.6 yards per punt, and his longest punt traveled 56 yards.
Mac Chiumento was Texas’s listed punter. His statistics show seven individual punts for 292 yards, while the team punting line lists eight punts for the same 292 yards.
The supplied box-score figures contain that difference in punt counts, so the team totals and individual totals should not be treated as identical.
Texas recorded three punts inside the 20-yard line compared with Oklahoma’s two. This indicates that the Longhorns had a slight advantage in that particular field-position statistic.
Punt Return Statistics
| Team | Returner | Returns | Yards | Average | Long |
| Texas | Ryan Niblett | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 11 |
| Oklahoma | Danny Okoye | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 |
| Oklahoma | Dakoda Fields | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ryan Niblett recorded five punt returns for 16 yards.
His average was 3.2 yards per return, with an 11-yard longest return.
Danny Okoye returned one punt for eight yards for Oklahoma. Dakoda Fields did not record a return.
Neither team recorded a kick return in the supplied statistics.
These figures show that punt-return production was relatively limited. Neither team generated a return touchdown or a particularly large return-yardage advantage.
How Oklahoma Won After Trailing 24-10
The most important part of this matchup was Oklahoma’s fourth-quarter response.
The Sooners entered the final quarter trailing 24-10. They needed 14 points just to tie the game and another score to take the lead.
Instead of allowing the deficit to determine the outcome, Oklahoma produced 17 points in the final quarter.
First Quarter: Texas Establishes Early Momentum
Texas opened the scoring with seven points.
Oklahoma failed to score during the opening quarter, allowing the Longhorns to establish an early advantage.
Manning’s passing production helped Texas create offensive opportunities, while Oklahoma struggled to generate an immediate response.
Second Quarter: Longhorns Maintain Their Advantage
Texas added 10 points in the second quarter.
Oklahoma managed seven points, keeping the game competitive but still trailing.
The Longhorns entered halftime with a 17-7 lead.
At that stage, Texas had the advantage in scoring and passing production.
Third Quarter: Defensive Pressure Takes Over
Neither team produced an offensive touchdown in the third quarter.
Texas was held scoreless, while Oklahoma managed three points.
The score became 17-10, leaving the Sooners seven points behind.
Although Oklahoma had not taken control, the defensive performance kept the game within reach.
Fourth Quarter: Oklahoma Completes the Comeback
The final quarter was the defining period.
Oklahoma scored 17 points, while Texas added seven.
The Sooners’ scoring burst transformed the game from a 24-10 deficit into a 27-24 victory.
Several statistical factors help explain the turnaround:
- Oklahoma’s defense recorded two interceptions.
- Peyton Bowen converted one interception into a 42-yard touchdown return.
- Lloyd Avant provided a rushing touchdown and 72 rushing yards.
- Tate Sandell contributed nine points through field goals and extra points.
- Oklahoma avoided throwing an interception.
The supplied data does not provide a complete chronological scoring log, so it would be inaccurate to assign each touchdown or field goal to an exact minute without additional play-by-play evidence.
Nevertheless, the quarter-by-quarter scoring makes the scale of Oklahoma’s comeback clear.
Why Oklahoma Won Despite Texas Having Better Offensive Numbers
The result becomes easier to understand when individual statistics are considered alongside the final score.
Texas produced 260 passing yards compared with Oklahoma’s 155. The Longhorns also had more rushing yards, more receiving yards, and more sacks.
Despite those advantages, Oklahoma won.
There were several reasons for the difference.
1. Oklahoma Created More Valuable Turnovers
Oklahoma recorded two interceptions, while Texas did not record any.
Bowen’s interception return for a touchdown was especially important because it turned a defensive play into immediate points.
Turnovers are not simply defensive statistics. They can change field position, scoring opportunities, and the psychological direction of a game.
2. Texas Could Not Protect Its Passing Production
Manning threw three touchdown passes, but his two interceptions reduced the overall value of his passing performance.
The Longhorns generated impressive offensive numbers but failed to maintain the same level of control throughout the game.
3. Oklahoma Received an Important Rushing Contribution
Avant’s 72 rushing yards and one touchdown gave Oklahoma another way to generate offense.
His 7.2-yard average was considerably higher than Oklahoma’s team average of 2.7 yards per carry.
Although the Sooners did not dominate the ground game, Avant provided an important individual contribution.
4. Special Teams Added Valuable Points
Sandell scored nine points compared with Spetic’s six.
His successful 53-yard field goal demonstrated his ability to contribute from long range.
In a game decided by three points, special teams production deserves attention.
5. Oklahoma Finished Stronger
The most obvious difference was the fourth quarter.
Texas scored 17 points in the first half but could not maintain its advantage.
Oklahoma scored 17 points in the final quarter, demonstrating how quickly the momentum changed.
The comeback was not the result of one player alone. It involved offensive contributions, defensive takeaways, and successful kicking.
What These Player Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
This matchup provides several useful lessons about evaluating college football performances.
Texas Had the More Productive Passing Offense
Manning’s 260 yards and three touchdowns were the strongest passing numbers in the game.
Coleman and Wingo also delivered explosive receiving performances.
However, two interceptions created problems that were reflected in the final result.
Oklahoma Had the More Effective Defensive Performance
The Sooners did not record as many sacks or tackles for loss as Texas.
However, their two interceptions were more valuable in terms of changing possession and creating scoring opportunities.
Bowen’s defensive touchdown was the standout example.
Individual Production Did Not Guarantee a Team Victory
Coleman finished with 110 receiving yards and a touchdown. Manning threw three touchdowns. Texas also gained more rushing and receiving yards.
Those performances were not enough to secure a victory.
This is why readers should evaluate player statistics alongside turnovers, scoring efficiency, defensive contributions, and quarter-by-quarter results.
The Fourth Quarter Deserves Special Attention
A final score can hide the way a game developed.
In this case, Oklahoma’s 17-point fourth quarter was more important than its relatively limited offensive production across the earlier periods.
Anyone analyzing this matchup should pay particular attention to the final quarter rather than relying exclusively on full-game totals.
Official Box Score and Statistical Reference
The figures discussed in this article are based on the supplied ESPN college football box-score data for game ID 401856717.
For the original game record, consult the official ESPN Oklahoma vs Texas box score.
This is the appropriate reference for checking individual player statistics, team totals, defensive contributions, and special teams numbers.
When comparing these figures with other sports databases, readers should also check whether the source reports individual and team statistics using the same definitions.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Oklahoma Sooners vs Texas Longhorns football game on October 11, 2026?
The Oklahoma Sooners defeated the Texas Longhorns 27-24. Oklahoma scored 17 points in the fourth quarter to complete a comeback after trailing 24-10.
2. How many passing yards did Arch Manning record against Oklahoma?
Arch Manning completed 19 of 31 passes for 260 yards, three touchdowns, and two interceptions. He averaged 8.4 yards per attempt and recorded a 72.0 QBR.
3. How did John Mateer perform against Texas?
John Mateer completed 18 of 26 passes for 155 yards without a passing touchdown or interception. He also recorded 12 rushing attempts for minus-six yards.
4. Who was Oklahoma’s leading rusher against Texas?
Lloyd Avant was Oklahoma’s leading rusher. He recorded 72 yards on 10 carries, averaged 7.2 yards per carry, and scored one rushing touchdown.
5. Who was the leading receiver in the Oklahoma vs Texas game?
Cam Coleman was the leading receiver. He recorded five receptions for 110 yards and one touchdown, averaging 22 yards per reception.
6. How many interceptions did Oklahoma record against Texas?
Oklahoma recorded two interceptions. Peyton Bowen returned one interception 42 yards for a touchdown, while Courtland Guillory recorded the other interception.
Conclusion
The Oklahoma Sooners’ 27-24 victory over the Texas Longhorns was a strong example of how defensive execution and late-game performance can outweigh advantages in offensive yardage.
Arch Manning delivered an impressive passing performance with 260 yards and three touchdowns, while Cam Coleman led all listed receivers with 110 yards. Texas also had the advantage in total rushing production, sacks, and tackles for loss.
However, Oklahoma found ways to make the most important plays.
John Mateer protected the football through the air, Lloyd Avant contributed 72 rushing yards and a touchdown, and Peyton Bowen changed the game with his 42-yard interception return for a touchdown. Tate Sandell also contributed nine points through successful field goals and extra points.
The defining moment was Oklahoma’s fourth-quarter scoring performance. After trailing 24-10, the Sooners scored 17 points to complete the comeback and secure a three-point victory.
Ultimately, the oklahoma sooners football vs texas longhorns football match player stats demonstrate that individual yardage totals do not always determine the winner. Turnovers, defensive touchdowns, special teams execution, and performance under pressure were the deciding factors in this rivalry matchup.
