Sacramento Kings vs Timberwolves Match Player Stats

The sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats from the November 2025 meeting show a game controlled by Minnesota from the second quarter onward. The Timberwolves defeated the Kings 144-117 at Golden 1 Center, using efficient shooting, strong interior scoring, and disciplined ball movement to create a 27-point victory. Anthony Edwards led Minnesota with 26 points and five assists, while Rudy Gobert controlled the glass with 12 rebounds and five blocks. For Sacramento, Zach LaVine scored 26 points and DeMar DeRozan added 22, but the Kings struggled to match Minnesota’s overall efficiency.

The official NBA game record confirms the 144-117 final score and the major statistical leaders. It also records Minnesota’s 64 points in the paint and 32 fast-break points, two areas that help explain how the Timberwolves created such a large margin.

Game Overview

The matchup took place at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento. The listed attendance was 15,227, and the game featured a clear contrast in offensive efficiency.

Minnesota finished with:

• 144 points
• 52-of-97 shooting from the field
• 18-of-46 shooting from three-point range
• 22-of-24 free throws
• 44 rebounds
• 28 assists
• 10 turnovers
• 11 steals
• 9 blocks

Sacramento finished with:

• 117 points
• 40-of-90 shooting from the field
• 13-of-29 shooting from three-point range
• 24-of-31 free throws
• 43 rebounds
• 25 assists
• 16 turnovers
• 8 steals
• 3 blocks

The basic numbers immediately show why Minnesota won.

The Timberwolves attempted seven more field goals and made 12 more. They also made five more three-pointers. Sacramento actually shot better from three-point range by percentage, but Minnesota created much more overall offense through volume, transition play, and interior scoring.

Sacramento Kings vs Timberwolves Match Player Stats

The sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats provide a useful picture of how individual performances translated into the final result.

Minnesota Timberwolves Leaders

Category	Player	Stat
Top scorer	Anthony Edwards	26 points
Top rebounder	Rudy Gobert	12 rebounds
Top assists	Anthony Edwards	5 assists
Blocks leader	Rudy Gobert	5 blocks
Three-point leader	Anthony Edwards	5 threes

Anthony Edwards was the headline offensive player for Minnesota. He scored 26 points while adding five assists. His five made three-pointers were also a major part of Minnesota’s perimeter attack.

Jaden McDaniels provided an efficient secondary scoring performance with 21 points. Julius Randle and Rudy Gobert each scored 19 points, giving Minnesota four players at 19 points or more.

Gobert’s value extended well beyond his scoring. His 12 rebounds and five blocks gave Minnesota a strong defensive presence around the basket.

Sacramento Kings Leaders

Category	Player	Stat
Top scorer	Zach LaVine	26 points
Second-leading scorer	DeMar DeRozan	22 points
Top rebounder	Domantas Sabonis	13 rebounds
Top assists	Malik Monk	5 assists
Three-point leader	Zach LaVine	6 threes

LaVine matched Edwards’ 26-point scoring total and led Sacramento with six made three-pointers.

DeRozan added 22 points, while Sabonis collected 13 rebounds. Malik Monk led the Kings in assists with five.

The individual production was not the primary problem for Sacramento. The bigger issue was the gap between the two teams collectively. Minnesota had more efficient overall shooting, fewer turnovers, more steals, more blocks, and significantly more paint scoring.

How the Game Developed

The quarter-by-quarter scoring tells an important part of the story.

Quarter	Timberwolves	Kings
1st	31	25
2nd	40	29
3rd	40	30
4th	33	33
Final	144	117

Minnesota led 31-25 after the opening quarter. That six-point advantage was manageable for Sacramento.

The game changed dramatically in the second quarter.

Minnesota scored 40 points while Sacramento managed 29. That gave the Timberwolves an 11-point advantage in the period and expanded their halftime lead to 17 points.

The third quarter produced another 40-point Minnesota performance. Sacramento scored 30, meaning the Timberwolves added another 10 points to their advantage.

By the fourth quarter, the outcome was effectively decided. Both teams scored 33 points, producing an even final period.

The official NBA recap reports that Minnesota led 71-54 at halftime and reached its largest lead of 28 points during the third quarter.

That sequence is important because it shows that this was not simply a late-game collapse. Minnesota progressively built the advantage during the second and third quarters.

Anthony Edwards Sets the Offensive Tone

Anthony Edwards finished with 26 points, five assists, four rebounds, and two steals according to the official game recap.

His scoring efficiency was especially relevant because Sacramento had difficulty slowing Minnesota’s perimeter attack.

Edwards made seven of his 16 field-goal attempts. He also connected on five of 11 three-point attempts and seven of eight free throws.

That combination gave him multiple ways to generate points.

He did not need to rely entirely on difficult mid-range shots. His three-point shooting created spacing, while his free-throw opportunities allowed him to add points without needing additional field-goal attempts.

The game also included an interesting scoring progression.

Edwards missed his first five shots before finding his rhythm. He then hit a three-pointer and followed it with a four-point play during the second quarter.

According to the NBA recap, Edwards scored 16 points in the second quarter alone. He made four of six field-goal attempts, all three of his three-point attempts, and five of six free throws during that period.

That second-quarter explosion helped turn a competitive opening period into a substantial halftime deficit for Sacramento.

Jaden McDaniels Provides Efficient Scoring

Jaden McDaniels scored 21 points for Minnesota and was highly efficient.

He converted eight of 10 field-goal attempts, giving him an 80 percent field-goal percentage. He also made two of his three three-point attempts and all three of his free throws.

That efficiency matters because Minnesota did not need Edwards to carry every possession.

McDaniels gave the Timberwolves another reliable scoring option while maintaining strong efficiency. His five rebounds, three assists, and two blocks also show that his contribution extended beyond scoring.

This is one of the clearest lessons from the box score.

A high-scoring performance becomes even more valuable when another starter converts opportunities efficiently. Sacramento had to account for several Minnesota scoring threats rather than concentrating exclusively on Edwards.

Julius Randle Adds Another Scoring Option

Julius Randle finished with 19 points, six rebounds, and four assists.

He shot 8-of-16 from the field and made both of his free-throw attempts.

Randle’s role was important because he added frontcourt scoring without requiring an unusually high number of possessions. His four assists also helped Minnesota maintain ball movement.

The Timberwolves therefore had several players contributing simultaneously.

Edwards scored 26.

McDaniels scored 21.

Randle scored 19.

Gobert scored 19.

That balance made Minnesota’s offense difficult to contain.

Rudy Gobert Controls the Interior

Rudy Gobert’s statistical impact can be seen most clearly in the rebounding and defensive numbers.

He collected 12 rebounds and recorded five blocks.

His 19 points also gave Minnesota a strong scoring contribution from the center position.

The five blocks were particularly important because Sacramento’s offense included interior opportunities through its frontcourt. Gobert’s presence gave Minnesota a defensive safety net near the basket.

The team-wide block comparison was also significant.

Minnesota recorded nine blocks compared with three for Sacramento.

That six-block difference represents a substantial defensive advantage.

Gobert did not need to score 30 points to dominate the game. His value came from combining efficient scoring with rebounding and rim protection.

Zach LaVine Keeps Sacramento Competitive

Zach LaVine was Sacramento’s leading scorer with 26 points.

He also made six three-pointers, the most of any Kings player.

His outside shooting helped Sacramento produce 13 three-pointers overall.

However, LaVine’s scoring could not overcome Minnesota’s broader statistical advantage.

This is an important distinction when evaluating individual player performances.

A player can produce an excellent scoring total while his team still loses comfortably. In this matchup, LaVine’s 26 points were almost identical to Edwards’ scoring output, yet Minnesota won by 27.

The difference came from the supporting numbers and team efficiency.

DeMar DeRozan Adds 22 Points

DeMar DeRozan scored 22 points for Sacramento.

Together, LaVine and DeRozan supplied 48 points, accounting for a large portion of Sacramento’s total.

Their scoring prevented the game from becoming an offensive shutdown for the Kings.

However, Minnesota’s scoring was distributed more evenly across its lineup. The Timberwolves received 26 from Edwards, 21 from McDaniels, and 19 each from Randle and Gobert.

That four-player scoring structure helped Minnesota maintain pressure throughout the game.

Domantas Sabonis Controls the Rebounding Battle

Domantas Sabonis finished with 13 rebounds, making him Sacramento’s leading rebounder.

The Kings actually stayed close to Minnesota in total rebounding.

Sacramento recorded 43 rebounds.

Minnesota recorded 44.

That one-rebound difference shows that the game was not decided simply because Minnesota dominated the boards.

Sabonis’ 13 rebounds were particularly important because Sacramento needed second chances and possessions to stay within striking distance.

The Kings also collected 12 offensive rebounds, compared with nine for Minnesota.

So, from a rebounding perspective, Sacramento had some positive elements.

The larger differences appeared in shooting efficiency, turnovers, defensive plays, and scoring efficiency.

Malik Monk Leads Sacramento in Assists

Malik Monk finished with five assists, tying Edwards for the highest assist total among the game’s highlighted leaders.

Sacramento recorded 25 assists overall.

Minnesota recorded 28.

The three-assist difference was not enormous by itself.

However, assists become more meaningful when combined with shooting efficiency.

Minnesota converted 52 field goals from 97 attempts. Sacramento made 40 from 90.

Minnesota therefore produced 12 more made field goals from only seven additional attempts.

That is a major efficiency gap.

Shooting Efficiency Explains Much of the Margin

One of the strongest statistical differences in this matchup was field-goal shooting.

Minnesota shot 54 percent from the field.

Sacramento shot 44 percent.

That represents roughly a 10-percentage-point gap.

Minnesota’s 52 made field goals also exceeded Sacramento’s total by 12.

Three-point shooting adds another layer.

The Timberwolves made 18 three-pointers on 46 attempts, or 39 percent.

The Kings made 13 on 29 attempts, or 45 percent.

Sacramento had the better three-point percentage, but Minnesota made five more threes.

This illustrates why percentage alone should not be used to judge offensive performance.

The Timberwolves created more three-point attempts and converted enough of them to produce a larger total.

Free Throws Tell a Different Story

Sacramento actually attempted more free throws.

The Kings went 24-of-31 from the line.

Minnesota went 22-of-24.

Sacramento therefore scored 24 free-throw points compared with Minnesota’s 22.

The Kings also had more free-throw attempts.

Yet Minnesota still won by 27 points.

This reinforces the importance of looking at the entire statistical profile rather than one category.

Free throws favored Sacramento slightly in total points, but field goals and three-point production strongly favored Minnesota.

Minnesota’s 52 field goals compared with Sacramento’s 40 created a much larger difference.

Turnovers Were a Major Difference

Turnovers provide another clear explanation.

Minnesota committed 10 turnovers.

Sacramento committed 16.

That six-turnover difference gave Minnesota additional opportunities and helped generate transition offense.

The official NBA game summary lists Minnesota with 32 fast-break points compared with 20 for Sacramento.

This connection is important.

Turnovers do not only remove offensive possessions. They can also create immediate scoring opportunities for the opponent.

Minnesota’s 11 steals compared with Sacramento’s eight further demonstrate the Timberwolves’ activity on defense.

The Kings had 16 turnovers against a team that was able to convert mistakes into transition opportunities.

Points in the Paint Were a Defining Factor

Minnesota scored 64 points in the paint.

Sacramento scored 46.

That is an 18-point advantage for the Timberwolves.

This is one of the most useful numbers for understanding the game.

Minnesota was not dependent solely on three-point shooting. The team also generated consistent interior offense.

The combination of 64 paint points and 18 made threes gave the Timberwolves multiple scoring routes.

Sacramento, meanwhile, produced 46 points in the paint and 13 made threes.

The difference was not that Sacramento could not score inside or outside. It was that Minnesota generated more production across both areas.

Minnesota’s Offensive Balance Was the Key

The sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats show that Minnesota’s biggest advantage was not one individual statistic.

It was the combination of several strengths.

The Timberwolves:

• Shot 54 percent from the field.
• Made 18 three-pointers.
• Scored 64 points in the paint.
• Recorded 28 assists.
• Committed only 10 turnovers.
• Produced 11 steals.
• Recorded nine blocks.
• Had four players score at least 19 points.

That is a broad offensive and defensive profile.

Sacramento’s individual leaders still performed well, but the Kings could not match Minnesota’s overall production.

Team Comparison

Statistic	Timberwolves	Kings	Difference
Points	144	117	+27 MIN
Field Goals	52-97	40-90	+12 makes MIN
FG%	54%	44%	+10 percentage points MIN
Three-Pointers	18-46	13-29	+5 makes MIN
3PT%	39%	45%	+6 percentage points SAC
Free Throws	22-24	24-31	+2 makes SAC
Rebounds	44	43	+1 MIN
Assists	28	25	+3 MIN
Turnovers	10	16	6 fewer MIN
Steals	11	8	+3 MIN
Blocks	9	3	+6 MIN
Offensive Rebounds	9	12	+3 SAC
Defensive Rebounds	35	31	+4 MIN
Personal Fouls	23	20	3 fewer SAC

The table makes one point especially clear.

Minnesota won in several high-impact categories simultaneously.

Sacramento had advantages in three-point percentage, free throws, and offensive rebounds. But Minnesota’s field-goal efficiency, total made threes, assists, turnovers, steals, blocks, and interior scoring created a much larger overall advantage.

Why the 27-Point Margin Matters

A 27-point final margin can sometimes be misleading if it comes primarily from a late run.

That was not the case here.

Minnesota led by 17 at halftime.

The Timberwolves then scored 40 points in the third quarter and extended the advantage further.

The official NBA recap reports that Minnesota reached a 28-point lead during the third quarter.

Sacramento matched Minnesota 33-33 in the fourth quarter.

That means the Kings did not lose the final period. Instead, the damage had already been done during the middle quarters.

For analysts, this distinction matters.

The game was decided primarily by Minnesota’s second- and third-quarter offensive output rather than a fourth-quarter collapse.

What the Matchup Shows About Offensive Efficiency

The game provides a useful example of why raw scoring totals should be examined alongside efficiency.

Sacramento scored 117 points, which is a strong offensive total in isolation.

Yet Minnesota scored 144.

The Timberwolves did this while shooting 54 percent from the field and making 18 three-pointers.

Minnesota also had 28 assists, suggesting that the scoring was supported by team offense rather than depending entirely on individual isolation possessions.

The Kings had 25 assists, so Sacramento also moved the ball effectively at times.

The larger issue was what happened after those offensive actions created shots.

Minnesota simply converted a much higher percentage of its field-goal attempts.

Defensive Activity Created Extra Possessions

The defensive statistics also deserve attention.

Minnesota recorded:

• 11 steals
• 9 blocks
• 10 turnovers committed

Sacramento recorded:

• 8 steals
• 3 blocks
• 16 turnovers committed

The Timberwolves therefore combined aggressive defense with relatively careful offense.

That is a strong formula for creating a large scoring margin.

Six fewer turnovers means Minnesota avoided giving Sacramento as many easy opportunities.

At the same time, 11 steals helped Minnesota generate additional possessions.

Nine blocks also limited Sacramento around the basket.

These numbers help explain why Minnesota was able to build such a significant lead without dominating total rebounding.

The Importance of the Bench

The main scoring leaders came from Minnesota’s starters, but the team’s overall scoring distribution still mattered.

Naz Reid contributed 13 points off the bench, according to the official NBA recap.

That gave Minnesota another meaningful scoring source outside its four leading starters.

Sacramento’s main scoring came from LaVine and DeRozan, with Sabonis also contributing significantly.

When a team relies more heavily on a smaller group of scorers, it can become harder to maintain production when opponents successfully limit certain actions.

Minnesota’s balanced scoring structure reduced that problem.

Starting Lineups

Timberwolves Starters

Minnesota’s listed starters were:

• Julius Randle
• Jaden McDaniels
• Rudy Gobert
• Donte DiVincenzo
• Anthony Edwards

This group combined perimeter scoring with size and interior defense.

Edwards supplied the primary scoring punch.

Randle provided frontcourt offense and playmaking.

McDaniels added efficient scoring and defensive versatility.

Gobert anchored the paint.

DiVincenzo supplied another perimeter option.

Kings Starters

Sacramento’s listed starters were:

• Precious Achiuwa
• Domantas Sabonis
• DeMar DeRozan
• Dennis Schroder
• Zach LaVine

The Kings had several experienced offensive players in this group.

LaVine and DeRozan were the primary scoring leaders.

Sabonis controlled the boards.

Schroder and Monk were important parts of Sacramento’s ball movement.

The challenge was getting the full group to match Minnesota’s efficiency across four quarters.

What the Score Says About the Season Context

After the game, Minnesota’s record stood at 6-4, including a 4-2 road record.

Sacramento moved to 3-7, including a 2-3 home record.

The result also put Minnesota ahead 1-0 in the season series based on the supplied game data.

These records should be viewed strictly as the standings context surrounding this individual game. They do not by themselves explain the performance.

The box score provides much more useful information about what happened on the court.

A Practical Way to Read This Box Score

If you are researching this matchup for fantasy analysis, historical research, team evaluation, or sports content, it helps to examine the statistics in a specific order.

Step 1: Check the final score

Minnesota won 144-117.

That establishes the outcome but does not explain it.

Step 2: Compare field-goal efficiency

Minnesota shot 54 percent.

Sacramento shot 44 percent.

This immediately identifies a major difference.

Step 3: Check three-point volume

Minnesota made 18 threes.

Sacramento made 13.

The Kings had the better percentage, but Minnesota generated five more made threes.

Step 4: Check turnovers

Minnesota committed 10.

Sacramento committed 16.

That six-possession difference is important.

Step 5: Check interior scoring

Minnesota had 64 points in the paint.

Sacramento had 46.

This shows that the Timberwolves were not simply winning through perimeter shooting.

Step 6: Check individual leaders

Edwards led Minnesota with 26.

LaVine led Sacramento with 26.

Gobert led the game in rebounds among the highlighted leaders with 12 for Minnesota, while Sabonis led Sacramento with 13.

Step 7: Check defensive production

Minnesota recorded nine blocks and 11 steals.

Those plays helped limit Sacramento and create additional offensive opportunities.

Key Takeaways From the Match

Several conclusions can be drawn directly from the statistical record.

Minnesota Won Through Efficiency

The Timberwolves converted 52 of 97 field-goal attempts.

Sacramento converted 40 of 90.

That was one of the biggest differences in the game.

Edwards Was the Main Perimeter Threat

Edwards scored 26 points and made five three-pointers.

His second-quarter scoring surge was particularly important.

Gobert Controlled the Defensive Interior

Gobert finished with 12 rebounds and five blocks.

His defensive presence contributed to Minnesota’s nine team blocks.

LaVine Produced Despite the Loss

LaVine scored 26 points and made six three-pointers.

His individual offensive performance was one of Sacramento’s strongest statistical positives.

Sabonis Won the Rebounding Battle

Sabonis collected 13 rebounds.

Sacramento also finished with 12 offensive rebounds, showing that the Kings were able to create second chances.

Turnovers Hurt Sacramento

The Kings committed 16 turnovers compared with 10 for Minnesota.

That six-turnover gap contributed to Minnesota’s ability to create transition opportunities.

Minnesota Dominated the Paint

The Timberwolves scored 64 points in the paint.

That was 18 more than Sacramento’s 46.

FAQ

Who led the Timberwolves in scoring against the Kings?

Anthony Edwards led Minnesota with 26 points. He also recorded five assists and made five three-pointers.

Who led the Kings in scoring?

Zach LaVine led Sacramento with 26 points. He also made six three-pointers.

How many points did the Timberwolves score?

Minnesota scored 144 points in the 144-117 victory.

How many rebounds did Rudy Gobert have?

Rudy Gobert recorded 12 rebounds and five blocks.

How many rebounds did Domantas Sabonis have?

Domantas Sabonis collected 13 rebounds for Sacramento.

What was the final score between Minnesota and Sacramento?

The Timberwolves defeated the Kings 144-117. The official NBA record confirms the result and the quarter-by-quarter scoring.

Conclusion

The sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats show a game where Minnesota’s overall efficiency overwhelmed Sacramento’s strong individual scoring.

Anthony Edwards led the Timberwolves with 26 points and five assists, while Jaden McDaniels added 21. Julius Randle and Rudy Gobert each scored 19, giving Minnesota four major scoring contributors. Gobert also supplied 12 rebounds and five blocks.

Sacramento received 26 points from Zach LaVine, 22 from DeMar DeRozan, and 13 rebounds from Domantas Sabonis. The Kings also shot 45 percent from three and collected 12 offensive rebounds.

Still, Minnesota’s 54 percent field-goal shooting, 18 made three-pointers, 64 points in the paint, 28 assists, 11 steals, and nine blocks created a statistical advantage that Sacramento could not overcome.

The most important difference was the combination of efficiency and possession control. Minnesota committed six fewer turnovers while creating more defensive plays and scoring more efficiently. The second and third quarters were especially decisive, with the Timberwolves scoring 40 points in each period.

For anyone studying this matchup, the final score tells only part of the story. The player production, shooting efficiency, turnover margin, paint scoring, and defensive activity together explain how Minnesota turned a six-point first-quarter advantage into a 27-point victory.