Lakers vs sacramento kings match player stats
The lakers vs sacramento kings match player stats from January 13, 2026, tell a clear story about how Sacramento turned efficient shooting into a 124-112 home victory. The Kings finished the game shooting 59% from the field and an exceptional 65% from three-point range. The Lakers had a strong offensive night as well, led by Luka Doncic’s 42 points, but their 22% three-point shooting created a major difference. Sacramento also received 43 bench points compared with 27 from Los Angeles, giving the home team more scoring support beyond its starting lineup.
The game was played at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, California, in front of 17,832 fans. The result moved the Kings to 10-30 while the Lakers fell to 23-14. Los Angeles entered the contest with a 2-1 advantage in the season series, but Sacramento controlled this meeting from the opening quarter and finished strongly.
This breakdown examines the most important player statistics, team numbers, scoring patterns, shooting efficiency, individual performances, and tactical lessons from the game.
lakers vs sacramento kings match player stats: Game Overview
The final score was Sacramento Kings 124, Los Angeles Lakers 112.
Sacramento built its advantage through consistent scoring across all four quarters. The Kings scored 32 points in the first quarter, 29 in the second, 34 in the third, and 29 in the fourth.
Los Angeles answered with 28, 26, 29, and 29 points.
That scoring pattern is important because the Lakers never experienced a complete offensive collapse. They scored at least 26 points in every quarter. Instead, Sacramento gradually created separation by being more efficient.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Los Angeles Lakers | 28 | 26 | 29 | 29 | 112 |
| Sacramento Kings | 32 | 29 | 34 | 29 | 124 |
Sacramento won each of the first three quarters.
The fourth quarter was even at 29-29, meaning the Kings entered the final period with enough of a cushion to protect their lead. That is one of the most useful details when analyzing the result. The Lakers did not lose because of a disastrous fourth quarter. They lost because Sacramento had already done enough damage before the final period.
The official NBA box score provides the game’s recorded scoring and player statistics. NBA official box score
Luka Doncic Leads the Lakers
Luka Doncic was the standout scorer for Los Angeles, finishing with 42 points.
His scoring line was one of the biggest individual performances of the game. Doncic scored 42 points while also contributing 8 assists and 7 rebounds. He also recorded 4 steals.
Doncic shot 16 of 25 from the field, which equals 64% shooting. He made 2 of his 9 three-point attempts and converted all 8 of his free throws.
His complete scoring profile shows an important contrast.
He was highly efficient from the field overall, but his three-point shooting was not as effective. The 2-for-9 mark from deep meant that his outside shooting did not provide the same efficiency as his overall field-goal performance.
Luka Doncic’s Key Numbers
| Category | Stat |
| Points | 42 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 8 |
| Steals | 4 |
| Field Goals | 16-25 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 64% |
| Three-Pointers | 2-9 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 22% |
| Free Throws | 8-8 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 100% |
Doncic’s 42 points represented a huge share of the Lakers’ 112 total points. His offensive workload was therefore significant.
However, individual scoring does not always translate directly into a team victory. Sacramento’s defensive challenge was to limit the rest of Los Angeles while accepting that Doncic could still produce a large scoring total.
The Kings ultimately succeeded in producing enough offense to overcome his performance.
LeBron James Adds 22 Points
LeBron James was the Lakers’ second-leading scorer with 22 points.
He scored 8 of his 17 field-goal attempts and made all 6 of his free throws. James also recorded 4 rebounds, 3 assists, and 1 steal.
His free-throw accuracy helped maintain his scoring efficiency. The Lakers received 22 points from James, but the team’s overall three-point shooting prevented the offense from reaching Sacramento’s level.
James and Doncic combined for 64 points.
That means the Lakers’ two leading scorers accounted for more than half of the team’s 112 points. Their production was strong, but Sacramento received more balanced scoring from several players.
That difference in distribution is one of the central themes of these lakers vs sacramento kings match player stats.
Deandre Ayton Controls the Glass
Deandre Ayton produced an important interior performance for Los Angeles.
He finished with 13 points and 13 rebounds, giving him a double-double. His 13 rebounds were the most on the Lakers.
Ayton shot 4 of 7 from the field and added 5 of 8 free throws. He also recorded 2 blocks.
His rebounding was particularly useful because Sacramento shot extremely well. When an opponent converts shots at a high rate, defensive rebounding opportunities can become limited. Ayton still managed to collect 13 boards and provide an interior presence.
His 13 rebounds were also important in keeping the Lakers competitive in the overall rebounding battle.
Los Angeles finished with 39 rebounds, compared with 32 for Sacramento.
That seven-rebound advantage shows that the Lakers did not lose because they were dominated on the boards. Their main problem was shooting efficiency.
DeMar DeRozan Leads Sacramento
DeMar DeRozan was the Kings’ leading scorer with 32 points.
His scoring performance came within a highly efficient Sacramento offensive attack. DeRozan helped the Kings maintain pressure throughout the game rather than relying on one player to carry the entire scoring burden.
Sacramento also received 26 points from Malik Monk and 22 from Russell Westbrook.
That gave the Kings three players with at least 22 points.
The distribution was different from the Lakers, where Doncic scored 42 and James added 22.
Sacramento’s Leading Scorers
| Player | Points |
| DeMar DeRozan | 32 |
| Malik Monk | 26 |
| Russell Westbrook | 22 |
| Zach LaVine | 19 |
Sacramento’s top four listed scorers combined for 99 points.
That balance reduced the pressure on DeRozan and allowed the Kings to keep scoring even when the Lakers focused attention on particular offensive players.
Malik Monk Provides Scoring and Playmaking
Malik Monk had one of the most complete offensive performances for Sacramento.
He scored 26 points and added 8 assists.
Monk was also highly effective from three-point range, making 7 of 9 attempts. That is a remarkable 77.8% three-point percentage for the game.
His shooting was one of the biggest statistical differences between the teams.
Los Angeles made 8 of 36 three-point attempts.
Sacramento made 17 of 26.
That represents a difference of 9 made three-pointers.
Because every made three is worth three points, that shooting gap had a major impact on the final score.
Monk’s 7 made threes alone nearly matched the Lakers‘ total of 8 made three-pointers.
His 8 assists also meant he was not simply a perimeter scorer. He helped create opportunities for teammates while maintaining a significant scoring role.
Russell Westbrook Adds 22 Points
Russell Westbrook finished with 22 points for Sacramento.
He also recorded 5 rebounds and 7 assists.
His contribution strengthened Sacramento’s backcourt production and gave the Kings another player capable of creating offense.
The Kings therefore had multiple sources of ball handling and scoring.
Westbrook’s 7 assists combined with Monk’s 8 assists gave those two players 15 assists. That was a significant part of Sacramento’s 23 total assists.
The Kings did not need one primary playmaker to create everything. Their offense had several players contributing to both scoring and distribution.
Lakers vs Kings Team Shooting Comparison
The biggest statistical difference in the game was shooting efficiency.
| Category | Lakers | Kings |
| Field Goals | 41-84 | 48-82 |
| Field Goal % | 49% | 59% |
| Three-Pointers | 8-36 | 17-26 |
| Three-Point % | 22% | 65% |
| Free Throws | 22-28 | 11-14 |
| Free Throw % | 79% | 79% |
The field-goal numbers immediately show Sacramento’s advantage.
The Kings made 48 shots from the field.
The Lakers made 41.
That is a seven-shot difference.
More importantly, Sacramento made those shots at a much higher rate. The Kings shot 59%, while Los Angeles shot 49%.
The three-point gap was even larger.
Sacramento made 17 of 26 attempts.
Los Angeles made only 8 of 36.
The Lakers attempted 10 more three-pointers than the Kings but made nine fewer.
That is a critical efficiency problem.
Why Three-Point Shooting Mattered
The Lakers’ 8 made three-pointers generated 24 points.
The Kings’ 17 made three-pointers generated 51 points.
That creates a 27-point difference in points generated from made threes.
Los Angeles made up some of that difference at the free-throw line. Both teams shot 79% from the line.
The Lakers made 22 free throws.
The Kings made 11.
That gave Los Angeles an 11-point advantage in free-throw scoring.
However, the Lakers’ free-throw advantage was not enough to compensate for Sacramento’s superior three-point production and overall field-goal efficiency.
The Bench Scoring Difference
Bench production was another major factor.
The Lakers received 27 bench points.
The Kings received 43.
That created a 16-point advantage for Sacramento’s reserves.
A team does not need its bench to outscore the opposing bench to win, but the difference becomes important when the starting units are already producing strong numbers.
Sacramento’s bench scoring helped keep offensive pressure on Los Angeles throughout the game.
The Lakers were heavily dependent on Doncic and James for scoring. Their combined 64 points represented a substantial portion of the team’s total.
Sacramento spread its production more widely.
That made the Kings’ offense less dependent on one or two players having huge scoring nights.
Rebounding Comparison
Los Angeles won the rebounding category.
The Lakers collected 39 rebounds.
The Kings collected 32.
| Rebounding Category | Lakers | Kings |
| Total Rebounds | 39 | 32 |
Deandre Ayton led Los Angeles with 13 rebounds.
For Sacramento, Precious Achiuwa and Dylan Cardwell each collected 7 rebounds.
The Lakers’ seven-rebound advantage did not translate into a victory because Sacramento’s shooting efficiency was significantly stronger.
This is an important lesson when reading basketball box scores.
A team can win a traditional statistical category such as rebounding and still lose comfortably if another category has a much larger effect on scoring.
In this game, shooting was more influential than the rebounding advantage.
Assists and Ball Movement
The Kings finished with 23 assists.
The Lakers recorded 21.
That was a relatively small difference.
However, the individual distribution tells a more detailed story.
Luka Doncic led Los Angeles with 8 assists.
Malik Monk led Sacramento with 8 assists.
Russell Westbrook added 7 assists for the Kings.
This meant Sacramento had two major playmakers combining for 15 assists.
The Lakers had a more concentrated creation structure, with Doncic providing the largest share of the team’s assists.
Both teams moved the ball reasonably well, but Sacramento paired its passing with much stronger shooting.
That combination made its assists more valuable because many possessions ended with efficient shots.
Turnovers Were Not the Main Problem
Los Angeles committed 10 turnovers.
Sacramento committed 12.
| Team | Turnovers |
| Lakers | 10 |
| Kings | 12 |
The Lakers therefore had a two-turnover advantage.
This is another reason the box score shows that the result was primarily about shooting rather than ball security.
Sacramento gave the ball away more often but still won by 12 points.
The Kings’ ability to convert their possessions efficiently outweighed their slightly higher turnover total.
Los Angeles could not turn its lower turnover count into enough scoring value because its three-point shooting was poor.
Steals and Defensive Activity
The Lakers recorded 9 steals.
The Kings recorded 6.
Los Angeles therefore had a three-steal advantage.
The Lakers also finished with 2 blocks, while Sacramento recorded 4.
These numbers show that both teams generated defensive plays, but Sacramento’s offensive efficiency ultimately had a greater effect on the final result.
The Lakers’ 9 steals were useful, especially considering the Kings committed 12 turnovers.
Yet creating extra defensive events was not enough to offset the 17 made three-pointers Sacramento produced.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
First Quarter
Sacramento opened the game with 32 points.
Los Angeles scored 28.
The four-point difference gave the Kings an early advantage.
The Lakers were still within one possession range, but Sacramento had already demonstrated the shooting efficiency that would define the game.
Second Quarter
The Kings added another 29 points.
Los Angeles scored 26.
Sacramento therefore extended its lead by three more points.
At halftime, the Kings had scored 61 points compared with 54 for Los Angeles.
The seven-point halftime advantage was manageable for the Lakers, but Sacramento’s efficiency suggested that the margin could grow if the shooting continued.
Third Quarter
The third quarter became the decisive scoring period.
Sacramento scored 34 points.
Los Angeles scored 29.
The Kings added five points to their lead and entered the fourth quarter ahead by 12.
That matched the final margin.
Fourth Quarter
Both teams scored 29 points in the final quarter.
The Lakers therefore did not lose the fourth quarter.
Instead, they were unable to reduce the deficit.
Sacramento’s ability to match Los Angeles in the final period protected the home victory.
What the Player Stats Reveal About the Game
The lakers vs sacramento kings match player stats provide several useful insights beyond the final score.
First, Luka Doncic’s 42 points were not enough because Sacramento’s offense produced better efficiency across the lineup.
Second, the Kings’ 17 made three-pointers created a major scoring advantage.
Third, Sacramento received 43 bench points compared with 27 from Los Angeles.
Fourth, the Lakers actually won the rebounding battle and committed fewer turnovers.
These facts show why looking only at one category can produce an incomplete understanding of a basketball game.
The Lakers’ Positive Numbers
Los Angeles had several strong statistical areas:
- 42 points from Luka Doncic
- 22 points from LeBron James
- 13 rebounds from Deandre Ayton
- 39 total rebounds
- 21 assists
- 9 steals
- 10 turnovers
- 79% free-throw shooting
Those are not poor team numbers.
The major issue was the shooting profile.
Sacramento’s Winning Numbers
The Kings produced:
- 124 total points
- 59% field-goal shooting
- 65% three-point shooting
- 17 made three-pointers
- 23 assists
- 43 bench points
- 32 rebounds
- 12 turnovers
- 79% free-throw shooting
The combination of shooting efficiency and balanced scoring gave Sacramento the statistical foundation for its victory.
Starters and Rotation Structure
The Lakers started LeBron James, Jake LaRavia, Deandre Ayton, Marcus Smart, and Luka Doncic.
Sacramento started Precious Achiuwa, Maxime Raynaud, Russell Westbrook, DeMar DeRozan, and Zach LaVine.
The starting lineups show how much offensive responsibility was placed on the major stars.
For Los Angeles, Doncic and James were the primary scoring names.
For Sacramento, DeRozan, Monk, Westbrook, and LaVine all contributed significantly.
This difference in scoring depth mattered.
When a team has several players capable of producing efficient offense, opponents cannot focus their defensive attention on a single scoring option for every possession.
The Importance of DeRozan’s 32 Points
DeMar DeRozan’s 32 points were crucial because they gave Sacramento a reliable scoring base.
His performance also complemented Malik Monk’s perimeter shooting.
That combination created two different offensive problems for Los Angeles.
DeRozan provided high-volume scoring, while Monk supplied elite three-point efficiency and playmaking.
Russell Westbrook added another layer through scoring and assists.
The result was an offense with several ways to generate points.
Why Luka’s 42 Points Did Not Produce a Win
A 42-point performance naturally attracts attention, but basketball is a five-player game.
Doncic scored 42 of Los Angeles’ 112 points.
That is approximately 37.5% of the team’s total scoring.
His performance was highly productive.
However, Sacramento scored 124 points, meaning the Kings produced 12 more points than the Lakers despite Doncic’s huge individual total.
The most important difference was not that Doncic failed to score.
He did not.
The difference was that Sacramento produced more efficient offense across more players.
This is exactly why player statistics should be studied alongside team statistics.
A Closer Look at Three-Point Efficiency
The three-point numbers deserve special attention.
Sacramento attempted 26 three-pointers and made 17.
The Lakers attempted 36 and made 8.
The Lakers therefore attempted more long-range shots but converted far fewer.
This created a difficult offensive equation.
More attempts can help a team generate points when the shots are falling. However, high-volume attempts become costly when conversion rates are low.
Sacramento’s 65% three-point percentage was the clearest shooting advantage in the game.
The Kings did not simply make more threes.
They made them at an extremely high rate.
Free Throws Kept the Lakers Competitive
One area where Los Angeles had a major advantage was free throws.
The Lakers made 22 of 28 attempts.
Sacramento made 11 of 14.
Both teams shot 79%.
Los Angeles therefore scored 11 more points at the free-throw line.
That helped offset some of Sacramento’s perimeter advantage.
Without that free-throw production, the final margin could have been even larger.
This is another reason the complete box score matters.
The Lakers did have an offensive path to staying close. They used it effectively at the line, but it was not enough to overcome Sacramento’s field-goal and three-point advantage.
Team Records After the Game
The Lakers entered the matchup with a 23-14 record and a 13-7 road record.
The Kings entered with a 10-30 record and a 7-13 home record.
Despite the difference in records, Sacramento produced one of its stronger statistical shooting performances in this matchup.
The result also mattered within the season series.
The Lakers had led the season series 2-1 before this meeting.
Sacramento’s 124-112 win changed the immediate momentum between the teams in this particular matchup.
Key Takeaways From the Match
1. Shooting efficiency decided the game
Sacramento shot 59% from the field and 65% from three.
The Lakers shot 49% overall and 22% from three.
That was the clearest statistical difference.
2. Doncic delivered a huge scoring performance
Luka Doncic scored 42 points while adding 8 assists and 7 rebounds.
His production kept the Lakers competitive.
3. Sacramento had better scoring balance
DeRozan scored 32.
Monk scored 26.
Westbrook scored 22.
LaVine scored 19.
That spread gave Sacramento multiple offensive contributors.
4. The Kings’ bench made a major contribution
Sacramento’s bench produced 43 points.
The Lakers’ bench produced 27.
That 16-point difference was significant.
5. The Lakers won the rebounding battle
Los Angeles collected 39 rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 32.
However, the rebounding advantage did not overcome the shooting gap.
6. The Lakers protected the ball better
Los Angeles had 10 turnovers.
Sacramento had 12.
Again, that advantage did not translate into enough scoring value.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Lakers vs Kings game?
Luka Doncic was the game’s leading scorer with 42 points for the Lakers. DeMar DeRozan led Sacramento with 32 points.
What was the final score between the Lakers and Kings?
The Sacramento Kings defeated the Los Angeles Lakers 124-112 on January 13, 2026.
How many points did LeBron James score?
LeBron James scored 22 points. He also recorded 4 rebounds, 3 assists, and 1 steal.
How many rebounds did Deandre Ayton have?
Deandre Ayton recorded 13 rebounds and 13 points for the Lakers.
Who led the Kings in assists?
Malik Monk led Sacramento with 8 assists. He also scored 26 points.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Sacramento shot significantly better from three-point range. The Kings made 17 of 26 attempts for 65%, while the Lakers made 8 of 36 attempts for 22%.
Conclusion
The lakers vs sacramento kings match player stats from this January 13, 2026 matchup show how a team can overcome a major individual scoring performance through efficiency, balance, and perimeter shooting.
Luka Doncic was outstanding with 42 points, 8 assists, 7 rebounds, and 4 steals. LeBron James added 22 points, while Deandre Ayton delivered 13 points and 13 rebounds. The Lakers also finished with more rebounds, more steals, fewer turnovers, and a significant free-throw advantage.
Sacramento, however, produced the more efficient offensive performance.
The Kings shot 59% from the field and 65% from three-point range. They also made 17 three-pointers compared with only 8 for Los Angeles. DeMar DeRozan led Sacramento with 32 points, while Malik Monk added 26 points and 8 assists. Russell Westbrook contributed 22 points and 7 assists, giving the Kings several reliable offensive creators.
The bench numbers further separated the teams. Sacramento produced 43 bench points compared with 27 for Los Angeles.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring also explains the result. Sacramento won each of the first three quarters and entered the final period with a 12-point advantage. Both teams scored 29 points in the fourth, so the Lakers could not reduce the deficit.
Overall, the box score shows that the result was driven less by turnovers or rebounding and more by shooting efficiency and scoring depth. The Lakers generated strong individual numbers, but Sacramento converted its offensive opportunities at a much higher rate.
