Minnesota Vikings vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats
The Minnesota Vikings vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats tell the story of a closely contested NFL London Games matchup played on October 5, 2025. Minnesota earned a 21-17 victory over Cleveland, improving its record to 3-2, while the Browns fell to 1-4.
The final score alone does not explain everything that happened. Cleveland produced more rushing yards and created pressure on Minnesota’s quarterback, while the Vikings generated explosive plays through the air and scored enough touchdowns to secure the win.
This game was a strong example of why football statistics need context. One team can win the rushing battle, record more sacks, and recover multiple fumbles yet still lose the game. Minnesota made better use of key offensive opportunities, received a huge performance from Justin Jefferson, and finished drives with touchdowns.
This detailed breakdown examines the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, special teams, and turnover statistics that shaped the Vikings’ four-point victory.
Minnesota Vikings vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats Overview
| Category | Minnesota Vikings | Cleveland Browns |
| Final Score | 21 | 17 |
| Record After Game | 3-2 | 1-4 |
| Passing Yards | 252 | 182 |
| Rushing Yards | 97 | 140 |
| Team Passing Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Team Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Team Sacks | 2 | 3 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 0 |
| Total Defensive Tackles | 80 | 75 |
The statistical profile of this game is interesting because Cleveland won several important categories. The Browns rushed for 140 yards compared with Minnesota’s 97 and recorded three sacks compared with the Vikings’ two.
However, Minnesota produced more passing yards and generated bigger plays through its receiving unit. The Vikings also scored three touchdowns, while Cleveland’s offense scored two.
That difference in finishing opportunities became one of the most important factors in the final result.
Game Summary: Vikings 21, Browns 17
The game remained competitive from beginning to end.
Both teams scored seven points during the first quarter. Cleveland added a field goal in the second quarter and took a narrow advantage into halftime.
The third quarter again produced touchdowns from both sides, keeping the game balanced heading into the final period.
Minnesota then scored seven points in the fourth quarter while Cleveland failed to score. That final-quarter difference gave the Vikings the 21-17 victory.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring
| Quarter | Minnesota Vikings | Cleveland Browns |
| First Quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Second Quarter | 0 | 3 |
| Third Quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Fourth Quarter | 7 | 0 |
| Final Score | 21 | 17 |
The fourth quarter was therefore decisive.
In close NFL games, the final period often reveals which team can execute when pressure is highest. Minnesota found the points it needed, while Cleveland was unable to add to its total.
Minnesota Vikings Passing Statistics
Carson Wentz led Minnesota’s passing attack and delivered an efficient performance.
| Player | C/ATT | Passing Yards | Average | TD | INT | Sacks | Rating |
| Carson Wentz | 25/34 | 236 | 6.9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 102.1 |
| Cam Akers | 1/1 | 32 | 32.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 158.3 |
Minnesota finished with 26 completions on 35 attempts for 252 passing yards and two touchdowns.
Carson Wentz Delivered an Efficient Performance
Wentz completed 25 of his 34 attempts for 236 yards.
His most important statistical contribution was avoiding turnovers. He threw no interceptions despite Cleveland recording three sacks.
That combination matters because quarterback efficiency is not simply about throwing for the highest possible number of yards. A quarterback can help his team significantly by protecting possession, moving the offense consistently, and avoiding mistakes that give the opponent easy scoring opportunities.
Wentz also finished with a passer rating of 102.1.
His performance gave Minnesota a stable foundation, especially when paired with the explosive receiving production of Justin Jefferson.
Cam Akers Produced One of the Game’s Biggest Surprises
Cam Akers attempted only one pass, but it became a major statistical moment.
He completed the pass for 32 yards and a touchdown.
The result was a perfect 1-for-1 passing line with a 158.3 passer rating.
This type of contribution demonstrates the value of offensive creativity. A player does not need multiple passing attempts to influence the game. One successful designed play can change field position, create a touchdown, and force future opponents to prepare for additional possibilities.
Cleveland Browns Passing Statistics
Dillon Gabriel handled Cleveland’s passing responsibilities.
| Player | C/ATT | Passing Yards | Average | TD | INT | Sacks | Rating |
| Dillon Gabriel | 19/33 | 190 | 5.8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 94.3 |
Gabriel completed 19 of 33 passes for 190 yards and two touchdowns.
He also avoided throwing an interception.
Dillon Gabriel Had a Solid but Less Explosive Day
Gabriel’s numbers show a quarterback who protected the football and produced two touchdown passes.
However, Minnesota’s passing attack created more yardage and more explosive production.
Cleveland averaged 5.8 yards per passing attempt, while Minnesota’s team passing offense averaged 7.7 yards per attempt.
That difference helped Minnesota create more efficient offensive production through the air.
The Browns also faced a challenge that affected the overall outcome: their offense could not score in the fourth quarter.
In a four-point game, one successful late drive could have completely changed the result.
Vikings Rushing Statistics
Minnesota’s rushing attack produced 97 yards on 23 attempts.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Jordan Mason | 13 | 52 | 4.0 | 1 | 14 |
| Zavier Scott | 5 | 18 | 3.6 | 0 | 9 |
| Jalen Nailor | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 | 15 |
| Carson Wentz | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 0 | 6 |
| Max Brosmer | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 |
Jordan Mason Led Minnesota on the Ground
Jordan Mason carried the ball 13 times for 52 yards and scored one rushing touchdown.
His 4.0-yard average represented steady production rather than explosive dominance.
That was enough to give Minnesota balance.
The Vikings did not need to completely dominate the running game because their passing attack generated significant production. Mason’s role was important because he helped prevent the offense from becoming one-dimensional.
The Vikings Found Value in Different Types of Rushing Plays
Jalen Nailor had only one rushing attempt, but it gained 15 yards.
Carson Wentz added 13 yards on three carries.
These contributions may appear small when viewed individually, but they demonstrate how modern NFL offenses can distribute rushing responsibilities across multiple players.
The Vikings finished with one rushing touchdown, and that scoring production became important because Cleveland failed to score any rushing touchdowns.
Cleveland Browns Rushing Statistics
Cleveland clearly won the rushing-yardage battle.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Quinshon Judkins | 23 | 110 | 4.8 | 0 | 32 |
| Jerome Ford | 5 | 18 | 3.6 | 0 | 10 |
| Malachi Corley | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 |
| Dillon Gabriel | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 8 |
| Dylan Sampson | 1 | -4 | -4.0 | 0 | 0 |
Cleveland recorded 140 rushing yards on 32 attempts.
Quinshon Judkins Was Cleveland’s Most Productive Rusher
Quinshon Judkins delivered one of the strongest individual performances of the game.
He carried the ball 23 times for 110 yards and averaged 4.8 yards per attempt.
His longest run gained 32 yards.
Judkins provided Cleveland with a dependable ground attack and helped the Browns control portions of the game.
Yet his performance also highlights an important reality in football statistics: gaining yards is not always enough.
Despite Cleveland’s 140 rushing yards, the Browns scored zero rushing touchdowns.
Minnesota produced fewer rushing yards but scored a touchdown on the ground.
That difference between yardage and scoring efficiency was critical.
Minnesota Receiving Statistics
Minnesota’s receiving group was led by a standout performance from Justin Jefferson.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| Justin Jefferson | 7 | 123 | 17.6 | 0 | 38 | 11 |
| Jordan Addison | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 1 | 15 | 6 |
| T.J. Hockenson | 6 | 38 | 6.3 | 0 | 14 | 6 |
| Josh Oliver | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 1 | 32 | 3 |
| Jalen Nailor | 3 | 27 | 9.0 | 0 | 20 | 4 |
| Jordan Mason | 3 | 4 | 1.3 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
Justin Jefferson Dominated the Receiving Yardage
Justin Jefferson caught seven passes for 123 yards.
He averaged 17.6 yards per reception and produced a longest catch of 38 yards.
Although he did not score a touchdown, Jefferson was the most productive receiver in the game in terms of receiving yards.
His performance demonstrates why raw touchdown totals do not always tell the full story about a player’s influence.
A receiver can create major value by:
- Moving the offense into scoring position
- Producing explosive plays
- Creating favorable field position
- Drawing defensive attention
- Opening opportunities for teammates
Jefferson’s 123 receiving yards represented a major part of Minnesota’s offensive success.
Jordan Addison Added a Touchdown
Jordan Addison caught five passes for 41 yards and scored one touchdown.
He was targeted six times, meaning he converted a high percentage of his opportunities into receptions.
Addison’s touchdown production complemented Jefferson’s yardage production.
This combination gave Minnesota multiple ways to challenge Cleveland’s defense.
Josh Oliver Made His Opportunities Count
Josh Oliver caught two passes for 35 yards and scored a touchdown.
His longest reception gained 32 yards.
With only three targets, Oliver made efficient use of his opportunities.
That is an important reminder when evaluating player statistics. High volume is valuable, but efficiency can be equally important.
A player with fewer touches can still produce a major impact if those touches create explosive gains or points.
Cleveland Browns Receiving Statistics
Cleveland spread its receiving production across several players.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| David Njoku | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 1 | 17 | 9 |
| Isaiah Bond | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 0 | 22 | 7 |
| Jamari Thrash | 1 | 22 | 22.0 | 0 | 22 | 1 |
| Jerome Ford | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 | 17 | 2 |
| Quinshon Judkins | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 | 18 | 2 |
| Jerry Jeudy | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 9 | 5 |
| Harold Fannin Jr. | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Dylan Sampson | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
David Njoku Led Cleveland’s Receiving Attack
David Njoku caught six passes for 67 yards and scored a touchdown.
He was targeted nine times, making him one of Cleveland’s most frequently involved receivers.
Njoku’s production helped give Gabriel a dependable target in the passing game.
Harold Fannin Jr. Added a Touchdown
Harold Fannin Jr. caught four passes for 13 yards and scored one touchdown.
His average yardage was low, but his touchdown mattered.
This is another example of why player evaluation requires more than one statistic.
Receiving yards measure production, but touchdowns measure direct scoring impact. A short reception near the goal line can be just as important to the final score as a long catch in the middle of the field.
The Biggest Individual Performances
Several players stood out in the Minnesota Vikings vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats.
Justin Jefferson
- 7 receptions
- 123 receiving yards
- 17.6 yards per reception
- Long reception of 38 yards
Jefferson was the game’s leading receiver and Minnesota’s biggest source of explosive receiving production.
Quinshon Judkins
- 23 carries
- 110 rushing yards
- 4.8 yards per carry
- Long run of 32 yards
Judkins was Cleveland’s most productive offensive player on the ground.
Carson Wentz
- 25 completions
- 34 attempts
- 236 passing yards
- 1 touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 102.1 passer rating
Wentz provided efficient quarterback play and protected the football.
David Njoku
- 6 receptions
- 67 receiving yards
- 1 touchdown
Njoku led Cleveland’s receiving attack.
Jordan Mason
- 52 rushing yards
- 1 rushing touchdown
Mason gave Minnesota an important scoring contribution on the ground.
Turnovers and Fumbles
One of the most surprising parts of the game was Minnesota’s turnover situation.
| Team | Fumbles | Lost |
| Minnesota Vikings | 2 | 2 |
| Cleveland Browns | 0 | 0 |
Zavier Scott and Jordan Mason each lost a fumble.
Cleveland recovered both.
Grant Delpit and Mohamoud Diabate recorded the recoveries for the Browns.
Why Cleveland Could Not Fully Capitalize
Recovering two opponent fumbles is usually a major advantage.
Turnovers can provide:
- Better field position
- Additional possessions
- Momentum
- Scoring opportunities
- Pressure on the opposing offense
However, a turnover only becomes truly valuable when a team converts the opportunity into meaningful results.
Minnesota still won despite losing the turnover battle.
That makes this game particularly interesting from an analytical perspective. Cleveland created opportunities, but Minnesota was better at producing enough scoring efficiency in other areas.
Neither Team Recorded an Interception
Both quarterbacks protected the football against interceptions.
Minnesota recorded no interceptions.
Cleveland also recorded no interceptions.
This meant that the game’s turnover story was entirely connected to Minnesota’s two lost fumbles.
For Wentz and Gabriel, avoiding interceptions helped prevent additional momentum swings.
Minnesota Vikings Defensive Statistics
Minnesota’s defense recorded:
- 80 total tackles
- 35 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 5 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 3 quarterback hits
- 0 defensive touchdowns
Eric Wilson Led Minnesota in Tackles
Eric Wilson recorded nine total tackles.
Theo Jackson added eight tackles.
Dallas Turner contributed seven total tackles and one tackle for loss.
Minnesota’s Pass Rush Produced Important Pressure
Jonathan Greenard recorded:
- 4 total tackles
- 3 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 1 tackle for loss
- 1 quarterback hit
Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins also recorded one sack.
Together, those contributions helped Minnesota produce two sacks against Dillon Gabriel.
The Vikings did not completely shut down Cleveland’s offense, but they made enough defensive stops to keep the Browns scoreless during the fourth quarter.
That was arguably the most important defensive achievement of the game.
Cleveland Browns Defensive Statistics
Cleveland’s defense produced:
- 75 total tackles
- 36 solo tackles
- 3 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 3 passes defended
- 3 quarterback hits
- 0 defensive touchdowns
The Browns actually produced more sacks and more tackles for loss than Minnesota.
Carson Schwesinger Led the Browns
Carson Schwesinger recorded 12 total tackles.
Ronnie Hickman added 10 tackles.
These two players were heavily involved in Cleveland’s defensive effort.
Mason Graham Produced a Major Pass-Rushing Performance
Mason Graham recorded:
- 2 total tackles
- 2 sacks
- 2 tackles for loss
- 2 quarterback hits
Those statistics stand out because all of his recorded tackles became impact plays.
Alex Wright also contributed one sack, two tackles for loss, and one quarterback hit.
Cleveland’s defensive front created real pressure, but Minnesota still found enough offensive success to score 21 points.
Why Minnesota Won Despite Losing the Turnover Battle
This is perhaps the most important analytical question from the game.
Minnesota lost two fumbles.
Cleveland lost none.
The Browns also rushed for more yards and recorded more sacks.
So why did Minnesota win?
1. Minnesota Produced More Passing Yardage
The Vikings generated 252 passing yards compared with Cleveland’s 182.
That 70-yard advantage helped Minnesota create more offensive opportunities through the air.
2. Justin Jefferson Created Explosive Production
Jefferson’s 123 receiving yards represented the biggest individual receiving performance of the matchup.
His ability to generate large gains helped Minnesota move the ball effectively.
3. Minnesota Scored a Rushing Touchdown
Cleveland won the rushing-yardage battle but failed to score on the ground.
Minnesota rushed for fewer yards but scored a touchdown.
This is a perfect example of why scoring efficiency matters more than simply winning a statistical category.
4. Cleveland Failed to Score in the Fourth Quarter
Minnesota scored seven points in the final quarter.
Cleveland scored zero.
In a game decided by four points, that difference determined the result.
5. Minnesota Protected the Football Through the Air
Despite the two lost fumbles, the Vikings threw no interceptions.
Carson Wentz managed the passing game efficiently and avoided giving Cleveland additional takeaways.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams played an important role in field position throughout the game.
Kick Returns
Minnesota’s Myles Price returned four kicks for 102 yards.
That produced an average of 25.5 yards per return.
Cleveland’s Jerome Ford returned three kicks for 78 yards and averaged 26.0 yards.
Both teams received solid kick-return production.
Punt Returns
Myles Price recorded three punt returns for 15 yards.
Cleveland’s Gage Larvadain returned three punts for 31 yards.
Larvadain averaged 10.3 yards per punt return and produced Cleveland’s better punt-return numbers.
Kicking Statistics
Minnesota’s Will Reichard:
- 0-for-1 on field goals
- 3-for-3 on extra points
- 3 total points
Cleveland’s Andre Szmyt:
- 1-for-1 on field goals
- Long field goal of 31 yards
- 2-for-2 on extra points
- 5 total points
Cleveland received a successful field goal, while Minnesota’s missed attempt meant the Vikings relied entirely on touchdowns and extra points for their scoring.
Punting Statistics
Ryan Wright had a significant workload for Minnesota.
He recorded:
- 5 punts
- 286 total yards
- 57.2-yard average
- Long punt of 77 yards
- 2 punts inside the 20
Corey Bojorquez punted eight times for Cleveland.
He recorded:
- 360 total yards
- 45.0-yard average
- Long punt of 57 yards
- 2 punts inside the 20
The difference in punt averages suggests Minnesota received stronger distance from its punting game.
What the Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The numbers reveal two very different offensive approaches.
Minnesota Relied More on Explosive Passing
Minnesota’s offensive identity in this game was heavily connected to its receiving talent.
The Vikings had:
- 252 passing yards
- Two passing touchdowns
- 123 receiving yards from Justin Jefferson
Their biggest offensive advantage came through creating impactful plays in the passing game.
Cleveland Built Its Attack Around the Running Game
Cleveland’s strongest offensive statistical category was rushing.
The Browns produced:
- 140 rushing yards
- 110 rushing yards from Quinshon Judkins
- 32 total rushing attempts
The Browns showed that they could move the ball effectively on the ground.
The challenge was converting that yardage into enough points.
Minnesota Vikings vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats: Key Lessons
This matchup provides several useful lessons for anyone analyzing NFL statistics.
Yardage Does Not Always Decide the Winner
Cleveland rushed for more yards.
That did not produce a victory.
Minnesota’s ability to generate passing production and score touchdowns proved more valuable.
Turnovers Must Be Converted Into Points
Cleveland recovered two fumbles.
Yet Minnesota still won.
Creating turnovers is important, but teams must capitalize on the possessions and field position those turnovers create.
Explosive Plays Can Change Close Games
Justin Jefferson’s 123 receiving yards gave Minnesota an explosive dimension.
Big plays can quickly change field position and create scoring opportunities.
Fourth-Quarter Execution Matters
Minnesota scored seven points in the final quarter.
Cleveland scored none.
When the score is close, late-game execution often becomes more important than winning individual statistical categories.
How to Read NFL Match Player Statistics Correctly
A good football analysis should not simply list numbers.
Statistics become more useful when they answer important questions.
Ask Who Produced the Most Valuable Plays
The player with the most yards is not always the player with the greatest impact.
Touchdowns, third-down conversions, explosive plays, and late-game contributions can all change the meaning of raw statistics.
Compare Efficiency, Not Just Volume
For example:
- 110 rushing yards are impressive
- But a rushing touchdown can have greater direct scoring value
- 123 receiving yards can transform an offense even without a touchdown
- A quarterback can have fewer yards but play efficiently and avoid turnovers
Context is essential.
Look at the Final Quarter
The fourth quarter frequently explains the final result better than the total yardage numbers.
In this matchup, Minnesota’s seven fourth-quarter points and Cleveland’s zero were decisive.
Statistical Comparison: Minnesota vs Cleveland
| Statistical Area | Minnesota Vikings | Cleveland Browns | Advantage |
| Passing Yards | 252 | 182 | Minnesota |
| Rushing Yards | 97 | 140 | Cleveland |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 2 | Even |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 0 | Minnesota |
| Sacks | 2 | 3 | Cleveland |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 | 6 | Cleveland |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 0 | Cleveland |
| Fourth-Quarter Points | 7 | 0 | Minnesota |
| Final Score | 21 | 17 | Minnesota |
This table summarizes the unusual nature of the contest.
Cleveland won several statistical categories.
Minnesota won the category that mattered most: the final score.
Player of the Game Discussion
Based purely on statistical production, Justin Jefferson has a strong argument as Minnesota’s most influential offensive player.
His seven catches and 123 receiving yards provided the largest receiving output of the game.
However, Quinshon Judkins also deserves significant recognition after producing 110 rushing yards on 23 carries.
Carson Wentz delivered efficient quarterback play, while David Njoku provided Cleveland’s best receiving production.
The most accurate conclusion is that Minnesota’s victory came from contributions across multiple positions rather than one player carrying the entire team.
Jefferson provided the explosive receiving production.
Wentz managed the passing game efficiently.
Addison and Oliver scored receiving touchdowns.
Mason added a rushing touchdown.
The defense held Cleveland scoreless in the fourth quarter.
That complete combination produced the victory.
Final Analysis of the Match
The Minnesota Vikings vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats show why football cannot be understood through one statistic alone.
Cleveland had more rushing yards.
Cleveland recorded more sacks.
Cleveland recovered two Minnesota fumbles.
Yet Minnesota won 21-17.
The Vikings succeeded because they generated more production through the passing game, received a dominant 123-yard performance from Justin Jefferson, scored three total touchdowns, and made the most important plays during the fourth quarter.
Carson Wentz completed 25 of 34 passes and avoided interceptions. Jordan Mason scored on the ground. Jordan Addison and Josh Oliver added receiving touchdowns.
For Cleveland, Quinshon Judkins was outstanding with 110 rushing yards, while David Njoku contributed 67 receiving yards and a touchdown.
The Browns had enough positive individual performances to make the game competitive, but their inability to score during the final quarter proved costly.
Ultimately, Minnesota’s victory was built on passing efficiency, explosive receiving plays, touchdown production, and stronger late-game execution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Minnesota Vikings vs Cleveland Browns game?
The Minnesota Vikings defeated the Cleveland Browns 21-17 on October 5, 2025.
Who was the leading receiver in the game?
Justin Jefferson led all receivers with seven receptions for 123 yards.
Who led the game in rushing yards?
Quinshon Judkins led all rushers with 23 carries for 110 yards.
How many passing yards did Carson Wentz have?
Carson Wentz completed 25 of 34 passes for 236 yards and one touchdown.
Did either quarterback throw an interception?
No. Carson Wentz and Dillon Gabriel both finished the game without throwing an interception.
Why did Minnesota win despite losing two fumbles?
Minnesota produced more passing yards, scored a rushing touchdown, generated explosive receiving plays, and outscored Cleveland 7-0 in the fourth quarter.
Conclusion
The Vikings’ 21-17 victory over the Browns was a closely fought contest filled with strong individual performances and contrasting statistical strengths.
Minnesota’s passing attack, led by Carson Wentz and Justin Jefferson, provided the offensive explosiveness needed to overcome two lost fumbles. Cleveland received excellent production from Quinshon Judkins and created defensive pressure, but the Browns could not turn their advantages into enough points.
The final statistics show an important truth about NFL football: winning individual categories does not guarantee winning the game. Scoring efficiency, explosive plays, and execution during decisive moments ultimately separated Minnesota from Cleveland.
