Texas longhorns football vs Georgia bulldogs football match player stats
The texas longhorns football vs georgia bulldogs football match player stats tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Georgia defeated Texas 35-10 on November 15, 2025, using a dominant fourth quarter, efficient quarterback play, timely explosive passes, and a stronger overall rushing performance. The Bulldogs entered the game at 8-1 and improved to 9-1, while Texas fell to 7-3. (ESPN)
This matchup was particularly interesting because both teams had elite-level expectations and highly regarded quarterbacks. Texas relied on Arch Manning, while Georgia turned to Gunner Stockton. On paper, the passing yardage was relatively close, with Texas producing 251 yards through the air and Georgia producing 229. The difference came from efficiency, scoring production, rushing balance, and Georgia’s ability to finish the game.
According to the ESPN box score, Manning completed 27 of 43 passes for 251 yards, one touchdown and one interception. Stockton completed 24 of 29 passes for 229 yards, four touchdowns and one interception. That contrast explains why Georgia was able to turn a competitive 14-10 game after three quarters into a 35-10 result. (ESPN)
Texas Longhorns Football vs Georgia Bulldogs Football Match Player Stats
The texas longhorns football vs georgia bulldogs football match player stats provide several important lessons for anyone trying to understand how this game was actually won.
| Category | Texas | Georgia |
| Final Score | 10 | 35 |
| Passing | 251 yards | 229 yards |
| Completions | 27 | 24 |
| Attempts | 43 | 29 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Rushing | 23 yards | 128 yards |
| Rushing Attempts | 17 | 35 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Total Receptions | 27 | 24 |
| Tackles | 68 | 51 |
| Sacks | 2 | 3 |
| Tackles for Loss | 8 | 7 |
| Passes Defended | 1 | 4 |
The most striking number is not passing yardage. It is the rushing difference.
Georgia gained 128 rushing yards on 35 attempts, while Texas managed only 23 rushing yards on 17 attempts. That created a 105-yard advantage on the ground and allowed Georgia to maintain greater offensive balance. (ESPN)
Texas actually possessed enough passing production to remain competitive. The problem was that the Longhorns could not create enough balance. When a team finishes with only 23 rushing yards, the defense can increasingly focus on the quarterback and passing game.
Georgia did not have a spectacular rushing average at 3.7 yards per carry, but it consistently stayed committed to the ground game. That commitment mattered.
Arch Manning Player Stats and Performance
Arch Manning completed 27 of 43 passes for 251 yards, averaging 5.8 yards per attempt. He threw one touchdown and one interception and recorded a 63.9 QBR in the supplied ESPN box-score data. (ESPN)
From a raw yardage perspective, Manning’s performance was respectable. He completed nearly 63 percent of his passes and generated more passing yards than Stockton.
However, the important distinction is efficiency.
Manning needed 43 attempts to generate his 251 passing yards. Stockton needed only 29 attempts to produce 229 yards. That means Georgia’s quarterback was able to create considerably more production per attempt while also producing four passing touchdowns.
This is one of the most useful lessons from the game. Passing yardage by itself does not always tell you which quarterback played better.
Manning’s passing efficiency
Manning’s numbers can be summarized as follows:
- 27 completions
- 43 attempts
- 251 passing yards
- 5.8 yards per attempt
- 1 passing touchdown
- 1 interception
- 63.9 QBR
His completion percentage was approximately 62.8 percent.
That completion rate looks reasonable, but the relatively low 5.8 yards per attempt shows that many Texas completions did not produce major chunks of yardage.
Texas needed longer and more efficient possessions because its running game was struggling.
Manning’s rushing impact
Manning also recorded five rushing attempts for minus-17 yards. That figure significantly affected Texas’s overall rushing total. The ESPN box score shows Texas with 17 carries for 23 yards as a team, meaning quarterback losses were a major factor in the final rushing figure. (ESPN)
This is important when evaluating the offense. The Longhorns’ 23 rushing yards should not simply be interpreted as running-back failure. The quarterback’s negative rushing total also contributed heavily.
Still, from a team perspective, the result was the same. Texas could not consistently threaten Georgia with its ground game.
Gunner Stockton’s Breakout Performance
Gunner Stockton was the statistical difference-maker at quarterback.
He completed 24 of 29 passes for 229 yards, 7.9 yards per attempt, four touchdown passes and one interception. His reported QBR was 94.4. (ESPN)
The numbers become even more impressive when viewed alongside the game situation.
Stockton did not need 40 or more attempts to produce his passing total. Georgia’s balanced offense allowed him to operate from a more favorable environment.
He also added a rushing touchdown on six carries for 29 yards. ESPN’s game recap reported that Stockton accounted for five touchdowns overall, including four passing touchdowns and one rushing score. (ESPN)
That is the defining quarterback statistic from the matchup.
Manning produced 251 passing yards and one touchdown.
Stockton produced 229 passing yards and five total touchdowns.
The difference in scoring efficiency was enormous.
Why Stockton’s efficiency mattered
Stockton’s 24 completions on 29 attempts produced a completion percentage of approximately 82.8 percent.
That is dramatically higher than Manning’s approximately 62.8 percent.
Stockton also averaged 7.9 yards per attempt compared with Manning’s 5.8.
So although Manning threw for 22 more yards, Stockton was more efficient in almost every meaningful passing category.
The Georgia offense did not ask Stockton to carry the entire workload. Instead, the Bulldogs used a combination of passing, rushing, field position, and situational football.
That formula became increasingly effective as the game progressed.
Texas Rushing Stats
Texas finished with 17 rushing attempts for only 23 yards, an average of 1.4 yards per carry. The Longhorns had no rushing touchdowns and a longest run of 16 yards. (ESPN)
Quintrevion Wisner was the team’s leading rusher.
Quintrevion Wisner
Wisner carried the ball nine times for 37 yards, averaging 4.1 yards per carry. His longest run covered 16 yards.
His individual performance was much better than the team’s overall rushing average.
That distinction matters.
Wisner averaged 4.1 yards per attempt, while Texas as a whole averaged only 1.4. The difference largely reflects the negative rushing production elsewhere, particularly Manning’s minus-17 yards.
Wisner did provide Texas with a viable rushing option, but the Longhorns did not give him enough volume to establish a sustained ground attack.
Texas running game problem
The most concerning aspect for Texas was not simply the number of rushing yards. It was the lack of consistent success.
A 23-yard rushing performance forces the passing game to carry almost the entire offense.
That becomes especially difficult against a defense capable of creating pressure and defending the passing game with multiple players.
Georgia recorded three sacks, while Texas recorded two. The Bulldogs also defended four passes compared with one for Texas. (ESPN)
The defensive numbers support the broader conclusion that Georgia was able to make Texas increasingly one-dimensional.
Georgia Rushing Stats
Georgia’s rushing performance was considerably stronger.
The Bulldogs ran the ball 35 times for 128 yards, averaging 3.7 yards per carry. They also scored one rushing touchdown. (ESPN)
Nate Frazier
Nate Frazier led Georgia in rushing with 16 carries for 72 yards.
His 4.5 yards per carry and 21-yard longest run gave Georgia a reliable foundation.
Frazier did not need to score a rushing touchdown to have a major impact.
His value came from keeping the offense balanced and preventing Texas from focusing entirely on Stockton.
Gunner Stockton as a runner
Stockton also contributed 29 rushing yards on six attempts and scored a touchdown.
That mobility gave Georgia another way to finish drives.
When the quarterback can extend plays and also threaten the defense as a runner, defensive assignments become more difficult. Stockton’s rushing touchdown in the fourth quarter was also part of Georgia’s decisive late scoring surge. (ESPN)
Texas Receiving Stats
Texas completed 27 passes for 251 yards and one touchdown.
DeAndre Moore Jr. led the Longhorns with five receptions for 75 yards, averaging 15.0 yards per catch. His longest reception went for 19 yards. (ESPN)
DeAndre Moore Jr.
Moore was the most productive Texas receiver by total yardage.
His 75 yards represented approximately 30 percent of Texas’s entire passing output.
That is a substantial share of the offense.
Emmett Mosley V also made an important contribution, catching three passes for 66 yards and averaging 22.0 yards per reception. His longest reception was 40 yards, making him particularly effective on explosive plays. (ESPN)
Ryan Wingo
Ryan Wingo was another important part of the Texas passing game.
He caught nine passes for 62 yards and scored Texas’s only receiving touchdown.
His nine receptions were the highest total among Texas players, but his average of 6.9 yards per reception shows that much of his production came through shorter completions.
That combination is revealing.
Texas was able to complete passes, but Georgia limited the explosive nature of the passing attack often enough to prevent the Longhorns from consistently producing points.
Georgia Receiving Stats
Georgia’s receiving production was more efficient in the scoring department.
The Bulldogs completed 24 passes for 229 yards and four touchdowns.
London Humphreys led Georgia in receiving yardage with two catches for 55 yards and one touchdown. His average was an outstanding 27.5 yards per reception, with a 30-yard touchdown reception. (ESPN)
London Humphreys
Humphreys demonstrated exactly why yards per reception can matter.
Two catches were enough to produce 55 yards and a touchdown.
His 30-yard touchdown reception came during the fourth-quarter explosion that transformed the game.
That play was especially important because Texas had reduced the deficit to 14-10 in the third quarter.
Instead of allowing Texas to take control of the momentum, Georgia responded with an explosive scoring play.
Noah Thomas
Noah Thomas also had a major role.
He caught four passes for 32 yards and two touchdowns.
His touchdowns came in the first and second quarters, helping Georgia establish a 14-3 halftime advantage. ESPN’s scoring summary confirms that Stockton connected with Thomas for touchdowns of 17 and four yards. (ESPN)
Georgia’s receiving depth
Georgia did not rely on one receiver for all its production.
The Bulldogs distributed the ball among multiple players:
- London Humphreys: 2 receptions, 55 yards, 1 TD
- Zachariah Branch: 6 receptions, 41 yards
- Oscar Delp: 3 receptions, 36 yards
- Noah Thomas: 4 receptions, 32 yards, 2 TDs
- Chauncey Bowens: 3 receptions, 22 yards
- Dillon Bell: 2 receptions, 20 yards
- Cash Jones: 3 receptions, 17 yards
- Lawson Luckie: 1 reception, 6 yards, 1 TD
That distribution made Georgia difficult to defend.
Fourth Quarter Decided the Game
The fourth quarter is the single most important part of the texas longhorns football vs georgia bulldogs football match player stats.
Texas and Georgia were separated by only four points after three quarters.
The score was:
- Texas: 3
- Georgia: 7
First quarter.
Then:
- Texas: 0
- Georgia: 7
Second quarter.
Then:
- Texas: 7
- Georgia: 0
Third quarter.
That left Georgia ahead 14-10 entering the final period.
Then everything changed.
Georgia scored 21 unanswered points in the fourth quarter.
ESPN’s recap specifically highlighted Georgia’s fourth-quarter dominance and noted that the Bulldogs outscored Texas 21-0 during the final period. (ESPN)
The fourth-quarter scoring sequence
Georgia’s first fourth-quarter touchdown came on Stockton’s 30-yard touchdown pass to Humphreys.
The Bulldogs then scored on a touchdown pass to Lawson Luckie.
Finally, Stockton scored on a four-yard rushing touchdown.
The final sequence demonstrated Georgia’s ability to turn a close game into a decisive victory.
This was not a game that Georgia controlled from start to finish.
It was a game Georgia finished far better.
The Importance of the Onside Kick
One of the most interesting tactical moments came after Georgia’s fourth-quarter touchdown to Humphreys.
Georgia successfully recovered an onside kick, giving the Bulldogs another possession and preventing Texas from immediately answering.
That decision became one of the turning points of the game.
ESPN’s recap reported that Kirby Smart acknowledged the aggressive decision and explained that he would have looked foolish had it failed. Instead, the successful play created additional momentum for Georgia. (ESPN)
This is a valuable example of why traditional box scores do not tell the entire story.
An onside kick does not necessarily appear as a major statistical category, yet its strategic effect can be enormous.
Georgia effectively shortened the amount of time Texas had to respond while extending its own opportunity to build momentum.
Defensive Player Stats
Texas recorded more total tackles than Georgia, 68 to 51.
That number should not be interpreted as evidence that Texas played better defensively.
A defense can accumulate more tackles simply because it spends more time on the field.
Texas recorded:
- 68 total tackles
- 46 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 8 tackles for loss
- 1 pass defended
- 1 interception
Georgia recorded:
- 51 total tackles
- 33 solo tackles
- 3 sacks
- 7 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 1 interception
(ESPN)
The defensive comparison actually favors Georgia in several efficiency-related categories.
Georgia produced more sacks and more passes defended while allowing Texas to score only 10 points.
Anthony Hill Jr.
Anthony Hill Jr. recorded Texas’s interception.
He finished with one interception, no return yards and no defensive touchdown.
Texas also received a strong individual defensive performance from Ty’Anthony Smith, who recorded nine tackles, six solo tackles, one sack and two tackles for loss. (ESPN)
Colin Simmons
Colin Simmons also produced an important defensive performance for Texas.
He recorded three tackles, two solo tackles, one sack and 1.5 tackles for loss.
Those individual numbers show that Texas had disruptive defenders.
The issue was that the defense could not maintain control of Georgia’s offense throughout the entire game.
KJ Bolden
Georgia’s KJ Bolden recorded the Bulldogs’ interception.
He finished with three tackles, two solo tackles and one interception.
Georgia’s defense also received contributions from multiple players rather than relying on one dominant statistical performer.
That depth helped the Bulldogs manage Texas’s passing attack.
Special Teams Comparison
Special teams were another area where Georgia had an advantage.
Texas kicker Mason Shipley converted his only field-goal attempt from 33 yards and made his extra-point attempt, finishing with four points.
Georgia kicker Peyton Woodring did not attempt a field goal but converted all five extra points.
Texas punter Jack Bouwmeester averaged 41.8 yards across five punts, with three kicks placed inside the 20-yard line.
Georgia punter Brett Thorson averaged 34.6 yards across five punts, with one inside the 20.
(ESPN)
Georgia’s Zachariah Branch was especially useful in the return game.
He recorded two kick returns for 63 yards, averaging 31.5 yards per return, with a long of 44 yards.
Branch also returned three punts for 30 yards.
That type of field-position contribution can quietly influence offensive efficiency.
What the Team Statistics Really Tell Us
The texas longhorns football vs georgia bulldogs football match player stats reveal several deeper trends.
1. Passing yards were misleading
Texas had 251 passing yards.
Georgia had 229.
Yet Georgia won by 25 points.
This demonstrates that volume is not the same as efficiency.
Manning attempted 43 passes.
Stockton attempted 29.
Georgia’s quarterback generated four passing touchdowns compared with one for Texas.
2. Georgia had a major rushing advantage
Georgia’s 128 rushing yards compared with Texas’s 23.
That is a 105-yard difference.
The Bulldogs also had twice as many rushing attempts.
That allowed Georgia to control the pace and keep the offense balanced.
3. Georgia finished drives better
This may be the most important statistical difference.
Georgia turned its passing production into four touchdown passes.
Texas turned 251 passing yards into only one touchdown pass.
The Longhorns moved the football at times, but they struggled to convert those opportunities into points.
4. The fourth quarter belonged entirely to Georgia
Georgia scored 21 points in the fourth quarter.
Texas scored zero.
That single quarter accounted for 21 of Georgia’s 35 points.
5. Explosive plays mattered
Humphreys averaged 27.5 yards per catch.
Mosley averaged 22.0 yards per catch for Texas.
Both teams had explosive receiving plays.
The difference was that Georgia’s explosive plays came at more valuable moments and were connected to a more efficient scoring offense.
Why Texas Struggled to Score
Texas’s offensive problem was not an inability to complete passes.
It was the lack of balance and finishing efficiency.
The Longhorns completed 27 passes.
They gained 251 passing yards.
They had a receiver reach 75 yards.
They had another receiver reach 66 yards.
Yet the offense scored only 10 points.
The running game produced just 23 yards, making it difficult to sustain offensive balance.
Once Georgia understood that Texas was heavily dependent on Manning’s arm, the Bulldogs could apply more pressure to the passing game.
Three Georgia sacks and four passes defended support that interpretation.
Why Georgia Won
Georgia’s victory came from several complementary factors rather than one statistical category.
Efficient quarterback play
Stockton completed 82.8 percent of his passes and averaged 7.9 yards per attempt.
Better rushing balance
Georgia produced 128 rushing yards.
Superior touchdown production
Stockton threw four touchdown passes and ran for another score.
Fourth-quarter execution
Georgia scored 21 unanswered points in the final period.
Aggressive coaching
The successful onside kick was a major momentum play.
Receiving depth
Georgia distributed the ball among eight receivers.
Defensive pressure
The Bulldogs recorded three sacks and four passes defended.
Together, these factors explain the 35-10 result better than any single statistic.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The scoring pattern provides a useful timeline.
| Quarter | Texas | Georgia |
| First | 3 | 7 |
| Second | 0 | 7 |
| Third | 7 | 0 |
| Fourth | 0 | 21 |
| Total | 10 | 35 |
Texas opened the scoring with Mason Shipley’s 33-yard field goal.
Georgia answered with Stockton’s touchdown pass to Noah Thomas.
The Bulldogs then extended their lead with another Stockton-to-Thomas touchdown in the second quarter.
Texas responded in the third quarter when Manning connected with Ryan Wingo for a seven-yard touchdown.
At 14-10, the game was still competitive.
Georgia’s response in the fourth quarter changed everything.
Humphreys caught a 30-yard touchdown.
Luckie caught a six-yard touchdown.
Stockton added a four-yard rushing touchdown.
The final score became 35-10. (ESPN)
A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency
A useful way to evaluate this game is to compare production against opportunity.
Texas
Texas attempted 43 passes and 17 rushes.
That is 60 total recorded passing and rushing attempts.
Georgia attempted 29 passes and 35 rushes.
That is 64 total attempts.
The total offensive workload was similar, but the distribution was dramatically different.
Texas leaned heavily toward passing.
Georgia maintained balance.
That balance helped Georgia avoid placing too much pressure on one player.
What Fans Can Learn From the Box Score
For fans searching player statistics, it is tempting to identify the quarterback with more passing yards and call him the better performer.
This game is a perfect example of why that approach can be misleading.
Manning threw for 251 yards.
Stockton threw for 229.
But Stockton produced five total touchdowns.
The difference was not simply quarterback talent. It was the interaction between quarterback play, rushing support, offensive design, field position, and defensive pressure.
A complete statistical analysis therefore needs to consider:
- Completion percentage
- Yards per attempt
- Touchdowns
- Turnovers
- Rushing support
- Explosive plays
- Sacks
- Red-zone execution
- Fourth-quarter performance
- Field-position impact
Looking at all ten categories produces a much more accurate picture.
Key Numbers at a Glance
For readers who want the fastest possible summary, these are the numbers that matter most:
- Final score: Georgia 35, Texas 10
- Georgia passing: 229 yards
- Texas passing: 251 yards
- Georgia rushing: 128 yards
- Texas rushing: 23 yards
- Stockton passing touchdowns: 4
- Manning passing touchdowns: 1
- Stockton total touchdowns: 5
- Georgia fourth-quarter points: 21
- Texas fourth-quarter points: 0
- Georgia sacks: 3
- Texas sacks: 2
- Georgia passes defended: 4
- Texas passes defended: 1
- Georgia rushing attempts: 35
- Texas rushing attempts: 17
These numbers explain the outcome far better than simply comparing total offensive yardage.
How This Game Should Be Interpreted Historically
This matchup added another significant chapter to the Georgia-Texas rivalry in the SEC era.
The Bulldogs’ ability to defeat Texas again was particularly meaningful because both programs entered the contest with major postseason ambitions.
ESPN’s postgame report described the victory as Georgia’s sixth consecutive win and emphasized its importance to the Bulldogs’ SEC title and College Football Playoff positioning. (ESPN)
The result also reinforced a recurring theme in high-level college football.
Close games are often decided by execution in the final quarter.
Texas was still within four points after three quarters.
Georgia then produced three unanswered touchdowns.
That is the difference between competing for 45 minutes and closing a game for 60.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Texas vs Georgia football game in 2025?
Georgia defeated Texas 35-10 on November 15, 2025, at Sanford Stadium in Athens, Georgia. The Bulldogs led 14-10 after three quarters before scoring 21 unanswered points in the fourth quarter. (ESPN)
How many passing yards did Arch Manning have against Georgia?
Arch Manning completed 27 of 43 passes for 251 yards, one touchdown and one interception. His reported QBR was 63.9. (ESPN)
How many touchdowns did Gunner Stockton score?
Gunner Stockton accounted for five touchdowns. He threw four touchdown passes and scored one rushing touchdown. (ESPN)
Who was Texas’s leading rusher?
Quintrevion Wisner led Texas with nine carries for 37 yards, averaging 4.1 yards per carry. His longest run was 16 yards. (ESPN)
Who was Georgia’s leading receiver?
London Humphreys led Georgia in receiving yards with two catches for 55 yards and one touchdown. He averaged 27.5 yards per reception. (ESPN)
How many rushing yards did Georgia have against Texas?
Georgia recorded 128 rushing yards on 35 attempts, averaging 3.7 yards per carry and scoring one rushing touchdown. (ESPN)
Conclusion
The texas longhorns football vs georgia bulldogs football match player stats show that Georgia’s 35-10 victory was built on efficiency rather than simply accumulating more passing yards.
Texas actually finished with 22 more passing yards than Georgia, but the Bulldogs generated far more scoring production from those opportunities. Gunner Stockton completed 24 of 29 passes for 229 yards, threw four touchdown passes and added a rushing touchdown. Arch Manning completed 27 of 43 passes for 251 yards, with one touchdown and one interception.
The biggest statistical separator was the rushing game. Georgia produced 128 rushing yards compared with Texas’s 23. That 105-yard advantage gave the Bulldogs balance and helped keep the Texas defense from focusing exclusively on Stockton.
Georgia also finished the game with an extraordinary fourth-quarter surge. After leading 14-10 through three quarters, the Bulldogs scored 21 unanswered points in the final period. The touchdown pass to London Humphreys, successful onside kick and subsequent scoring drives demonstrated Georgia’s ability to combine execution with aggressive situational decisions.
The player statistics also highlight how misleading isolated numbers can be. Manning threw for more yards, but Stockton produced substantially more touchdowns. Wisner averaged 4.1 yards per carry despite Texas averaging only 1.4 as a team. Humphreys needed only two receptions to produce 55 yards and a touchdown.
Ultimately, Georgia’s victory came from the combination of quarterback efficiency, rushing balance, receiving depth, defensive pressure, field position and fourth-quarter execution. The final score was decisive, but the underlying statistics explain exactly how the Bulldogs created that separation.
