The pacers vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from April 30, 2025 tell the story of an Eastern Conference playoff game that came down to one possession in overtime. Indiana defeated Milwaukee 119-118 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Game 5, closing the first-round series 4-1. The box score shows a fascinating contrast: Milwaukee received a huge all-around performance from Giannis Antetokounmpo and a 33-point shooting display from Gary Trent Jr., while Indiana produced enough scoring balance, defensive activity, and late-game execution to survive.

Table of Contents

Pacers vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup was the fifth and final game of the Eastern Conference first-round series. Indiana entered the game with a 3-1 series advantage and home-court advantage, while Milwaukee needed a road victory to extend its season.

Instead, the Pacers prevailed in overtime.

Game Detail	Result
Date	April 30, 2025
Competition	NBA Eastern Conference First Round, Game 5
Venue	Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis
Attendance	17,274
Final Score	Indiana Pacers 119, Milwaukee Bucks 118
Result	Indiana won in overtime
Series Result	Indiana won 4-1
Milwaukee Record	48-34
Indiana Record	50-32
Milwaukee Away Record	20-20
Indiana Home Record	29-11

The final score does not fully explain how unusual the game was. Milwaukee actually scored 30 points in the opening quarter while Indiana managed only 13. The Pacers then responded with 28 points in the second, 34 in the third, and 28 in the fourth.

That comeback changed the entire shape of the game.

Quarter-by-quarter scoring

Quarter	Milwaukee	Indiana
1st	30	13
2nd	17	28
3rd	28	34
4th	28	28
OT	15	16
Final	118	119

Indiana’s ability to erase a 17-point first-quarter deficit was arguably the most important team-level feature of the contest.

How the Game Was Won

Looking beyond the final score reveals several reasons Indiana eventually prevailed.

Milwaukee shot 41-for-90 from the field, while Indiana finished 43-for-93. Both teams therefore converted at approximately 46 percent from the field.

The major difference came from how each team generated its points.

Milwaukee made 19 of 40 three-point attempts, an excellent 47.5 percent shooting performance from beyond the arc. Indiana made 12 of 33, or approximately 36.4 percent.

On paper, that should have given Milwaukee a major advantage.

But Indiana compensated through free throws and overall shot volume. The Pacers converted 21 of 28 free throws compared with Milwaukee’s 17 of 26. Indiana also attempted three more field goals.

The Pacers’ 12 turnovers compared with Milwaukee’s 17 were another meaningful difference.

Team statistical comparison

Category	Milwaukee	Indiana
Field Goals	41-90	43-93
FG%	46%	46%
3-Pointers	19-40	12-33
3P%	47%	36%
Free Throws	17-26	21-28
FT%	65%	75%
Rebounds	53	45
Assists	25	24
Turnovers	17	12
Steals	9	10
Blocks	4	4

The turnover margin is particularly interesting.

Milwaukee had five more turnovers, giving Indiana additional possessions in an overtime playoff game where every possession carried enormous value. The Pacers also recorded one more steal.

Giannis Antetokounmpo’s All-Around Performance

Giannis Antetokounmpo delivered the most complete statistical line for Milwaukee.

He played 44 minutes and recorded:

30 points
20 rebounds
13 assists
9-for-17 shooting
1-for-2 from three
11-for-17 from the free-throw line
2 steals
2 blocks
7 turnovers

The 30-point, 20-rebound, 13-assist combination demonstrates just how much Milwaukee relied on him.

His 20 rebounds were also the highest total by any player in the game. He was not simply functioning as Milwaukee’s primary scorer. He was also responsible for controlling possessions, creating opportunities for teammates, and protecting the interior.

The biggest negative statistic was his seven turnovers.

Against Indiana’s active defense, those turnovers mattered because the Pacers were able to turn mistakes into additional possessions and transition opportunities.

Giannis as a playmaker

The 13 assists are especially important when analyzing the game.

Milwaukee finished with 25 assists as a team, meaning Giannis accounted for more than half of them. That shows how central he was to the Bucks’ offensive creation.

His statistical influence extended into almost every major category:

30 points + 20 rebounds + 13 assists + 2 steals + 2 blocks

That is an extraordinary playoff workload.

The problem for Milwaukee was that even an elite individual performance was not enough to close the series.

Gary Trent Jr. Leads Milwaukee in Scoring

Gary Trent Jr. was Milwaukee’s leading scorer with 33 points.

His shooting line was:

Statistic	Gary Trent Jr.
Minutes	48
Points	33
FG	12-25
3PT	8-17
FT	1-2
Rebounds	5
Assists	2
Turnovers	2
Steals	5

His eight made three-pointers were particularly important.

Milwaukee’s 19 total three-pointers were a major reason the Bucks stayed competitive despite Indiana’s comeback. Trent’s 8-for-17 shooting from long range accounted for eight of those makes.

He also produced five steals, adding defensive value to an otherwise scoring-focused performance.

The efficiency was not perfect because he needed 25 field-goal attempts to reach 33 points, but the volume was justified by the importance of the game and his role in Milwaukee’s offensive attack.

AJ Green’s Six Three-Pointers

AJ Green provided another major perimeter contribution.

He finished with 19 points on 6-for-11 shooting and made an outstanding 6 of 10 three-point attempts.

That means Green alone supplied nearly one-third of Milwaukee’s 19 made threes.

His complete line included:

46 minutes
19 points
6-for-11 field goals
6-for-10 three-pointers
1-for-2 free throws
4 rebounds
1 assist
1 block

When a team shoots 47 percent from three in an elimination game, it normally expects that shooting to translate into a victory.

Indiana’s ability to overcome that perimeter efficiency says a lot about the Pacers’ overall execution.

Bobby Portis and Kevin Porter Jr.

Bobby Portis contributed 14 points and 10 rebounds in 44 minutes.

He shot 6-for-18 from the field and 2-for-5 from three. The double-double was useful, especially considering Milwaukee needed rebounding against Indiana’s frontcourt.

Kevin Porter Jr. finished with 11 points, seven assists and three rebounds.

His seven assists were second only to Giannis among Milwaukee players in the supplied statistics. However, he also committed three turnovers.

Together, the supporting cast gave Milwaukee meaningful production, but Indiana’s distribution of scoring and playmaking ultimately proved difficult to overcome.

Indiana Pacers Player Performance

Indiana’s victory was not built around one overwhelming scoring performance.

Instead, five starters reached double figures, while T.J. McConnell added 18 points from the bench.

That balance is one of the clearest lessons from the box score.

Tyrese Haliburton Controls the Pacers

Tyrese Haliburton led Indiana with 26 points.

His line:

Statistic	Tyrese Haliburton
Minutes	42
Points	26
FG	10-22
3PT	2-10
FT	4-4
Rebounds	5
Assists	9
Turnovers	1
Steals	3
Blocks	3

Haliburton’s three-point shooting was not particularly efficient at 2-for-10.

That is important because it shows that his impact cannot be evaluated only through perimeter shooting.

He contributed nine assists, five rebounds, three steals, and three blocks while committing only one turnover.

That combination of playmaking and defensive activity helped Indiana survive a game in which its three-point shooting was significantly worse than Milwaukee’s.

Haliburton’s efficiency under pressure

Haliburton attempted 22 field goals, second among Indiana’s starters behind the overall team volume.

He also converted all four of his free throws.

The most encouraging number from a ball-security perspective was his single turnover. Against a Milwaukee team that had 17 turnovers overall, Indiana’s primary creator gave away the ball only once.

For a playoff point guard playing 42 minutes, that is a highly valuable contribution.

Myles Turner Provides Interior and Perimeter Scoring

Myles Turner scored 21 points and grabbed nine rebounds.

His shooting:

5-for-11 from the field
3-for-6 from three
8-for-10 from the free-throw line

Turner’s three made three-pointers helped Indiana maintain offensive spacing.

His eight free throws were equally important. Indiana’s advantage at the foul line was one of the less obvious but meaningful differences in the game.

Turner also collected four offensive rebounds.

Those second-chance possessions can become especially valuable in postseason games because they extend possessions without requiring a new defensive stop.

Aaron Nesmith’s 12 Rebounds

Aaron Nesmith scored 19 points while leading Indiana with 12 rebounds.

He shot 8-for-15 overall and 3-for-6 from three.

His line included:

41 minutes
19 points
12 rebounds
3 assists
8-for-15 field goals
3-for-6 three-pointers

The 12 rebounds stand out because Milwaukee actually won the overall rebounding battle 53-45.

That means Nesmith individually made a substantial contribution to Indiana’s effort on the glass even though the Bucks controlled the team total.

Andrew Nembhard’s Two-Way Contribution

Andrew Nembhard finished with 15 points, six rebounds and six assists.

More importantly, he added three steals and one block while committing only one turnover.

His shooting line was:

5-for-14 FG
3-for-5 3PT
2-for-2 FT

Nembhard’s contribution illustrates why traditional scoring totals do not tell the whole story.

He produced across multiple categories while maintaining excellent ball security.

Pascal Siakam’s Quiet Offensive Night

Pascal Siakam scored only 10 points on 5-for-12 shooting.

He did not make a three-pointer or free throw, finishing 0-for-2 from both the three-point line and free-throw line.

Yet his role cannot be evaluated simply by points.

Siakam played 41 minutes and was part of an Indiana starting group that collectively helped overturn Milwaukee’s early advantage.

His five personal fouls also indicate the physical nature of the contest.

T.J. McConnell Gives Indiana a Major Bench Boost

One of the most important contributions came from the bench.

T.J. McConnell scored 18 points in only 17 minutes.

He shot 7-for-11 from the field and made all four of his free throws.

That works out to an extremely productive scoring rate for the minutes he played.

McConnell’s contribution was especially valuable because Indiana’s starters were carrying heavy workloads. Having a reserve guard produce 18 points gave the Pacers additional offensive energy without requiring another starter to take every shot.

Pacers vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats: Key Statistical Battles

The pacers vs milwaukee bucks match player stats become more meaningful when the individual performances are connected to the team numbers.

1. Three-Point Shooting vs Free Throws

Milwaukee had the clear three-point advantage.

The Bucks made 19 threes compared with Indiana’s 12.

That is a seven-shot difference from beyond the arc.

But Indiana made four more free throws overall.

Milwaukee’s 17-for-26 performance translated to roughly 65 percent, while Indiana converted 21 of 28 for 75 percent.

The Pacers therefore recovered some of the value Milwaukee gained from its perimeter shooting.

2. Turnovers

This may have been one of the most important statistical edges.

Milwaukee committed 17 turnovers.

Indiana committed 12.

That five-turnover gap represents additional possessions in favor of the Pacers.

Giannis alone accounted for seven Milwaukee turnovers. His 13 assists and 20 rebounds were extraordinary, but the turnovers illustrate the burden placed on him as Milwaukee’s primary offensive engine.

3. Rebounding

Milwaukee won the rebounding battle 53-45.

That is an eight-rebound advantage.

Giannis led everyone with 20 rebounds, while Bobby Portis added 10.

Indiana’s best rebounder was Nesmith with 12, followed by Turner with nine.

So why did Indiana win?

Because rebounding was only one part of the possession battle. The Pacers compensated through fewer turnovers, more made free throws, and enough offensive production from multiple players.

4. Scoring Balance

Milwaukee’s scoring was more concentrated around its leading players.

Indiana had five starters in double figures:

Haliburton: 26
Turner: 21
Nesmith: 19
Nembhard: 15
Siakam: 10

McConnell then added 18 from the bench.

That gave Indiana six players with at least 10 points.

Milwaukee had:

Trent Jr.: 33
Giannis: 30
Green: 19
Portis: 14
Porter Jr.: 11

The Bucks also had strong scoring distribution, but Indiana’s additional bench production helped balance the attack.

Why the First Quarter Was So Important

The opening quarter could easily have determined the game.

Milwaukee scored 30 points.

Indiana scored only 13.

A 17-point deficit in a playoff elimination game is dangerous.

Yet Indiana did not attempt to erase the entire deficit immediately. Instead, the Pacers gradually changed the game.

They outscored Milwaukee 28-17 in the second quarter.

Then they won the third quarter 34-28.

The fourth quarter was tied 28-28.

That sequence reduced Milwaukee’s early advantage before the game eventually went into overtime.

The lesson is important for anyone analyzing basketball statistics: a final score often hides the game flow.

Indiana did not dominate from the opening tip.

It adapted.

Overtime Decided the Series

The game entered overtime with the series still alive for Milwaukee.

The overtime score was:

Indiana 16, Milwaukee 15.

One point separated the teams in the extra period.

That makes every possession more significant.

The final 119-118 score also means the entire game was decided by a single point.

Indiana therefore completed a comeback that required not only recovering from the first-quarter deficit but also surviving an extremely tight overtime finish.

What the Stats Say About Each Team

Milwaukee’s Strengths

The Bucks showed several areas of strength.

Elite three-point shooting

A 19-for-40 performance from three is a major offensive weapon.

Gary Trent Jr. and AJ Green were especially effective.

Dominant rebounding

Milwaukee grabbed eight more rebounds than Indiana.

Giannis alone secured 20.

Giannis’ versatility

Thirty points, 20 rebounds and 13 assists demonstrates enormous individual influence.

Strong opening

Milwaukee’s 30-point first quarter established immediate control.

Milwaukee’s Weaknesses

The main concerns were:

17 turnovers
65 percent free-throw shooting
Seven turnovers from Giannis
Inability to maintain the first-quarter advantage
One-point overtime loss

The Bucks did many things well enough to win. Their problem was that Indiana consistently found ways to answer.

Indiana’s Strengths

Indiana’s advantages were different.

Ball security

Only 12 turnovers compared with Milwaukee’s 17.

Balanced scoring

Six Pacers reached double figures.

Free-throw efficiency

Indiana shot 75 percent from the line.

Defensive activity

Indiana recorded 10 steals and four blocks.

Resilience

The Pacers recovered from a 17-point first-quarter deficit.

Indiana’s Weaknesses

The Pacers were far from perfect.

Their three-point shooting was significantly below Milwaukee’s.

They also lost the rebounding battle by eight.

Haliburton shot only 2-for-10 from three, while Siakam finished without a made three-pointer or free throw.

Yet Indiana found enough alternative ways to create offense.

A Deeper Look at Shooting Efficiency

Raw shooting percentages can sometimes hide important details.

Both teams finished at approximately 46 percent from the field.

That might suggest almost identical shooting performances.

But the three-point distribution was very different.

Milwaukee attempted 40 three-pointers.

Indiana attempted 33.

The Bucks made 19.

The Pacers made 12.

This gave Milwaukee a substantial perimeter advantage.

Indiana responded by taking advantage of free throws and making more field goals overall, 43 compared with Milwaukee’s 41.

The result was a remarkably balanced offensive battle.

The Importance of Bench Production

The box score gives special attention to the starters, but McConnell’s 18 points deserve more consideration.

Indiana’s bench scoring came from a player who was highly efficient in limited minutes.

McConnell’s 7-for-11 shooting meant he converted approximately 64 percent of his field-goal attempts.

He also went 4-for-4 at the free-throw line.

In a one-point overtime victory, those efficient bench minutes can become extremely important.

The difference between a playoff win and loss is often not simply who has the best star.

It can be which team’s role players deliver at the right moments.

Player Comparison: Giannis vs Haliburton

A direct comparison between Giannis Antetokounmpo and Tyrese Haliburton highlights two different forms of leadership.

Category	Giannis	Haliburton
Points	30	26
Rebounds	20	5
Assists	13	9
Steals	2	3
Blocks	2	3
Turnovers	7	1
Minutes	44	42

Giannis dominated the traditional box score.

Haliburton was more efficient with the ball.

The comparison also shows why evaluating a playoff game requires more than identifying the highest-scoring player.

Giannis generated an enormous statistical workload, but his seven turnovers were costly.

Haliburton did not match his rebounding production, but his nine assists, three steals, three blocks and one turnover created a different kind of impact.

Player Comparison: Gary Trent Jr. vs Indiana’s Perimeter Group

Gary Trent Jr. led the game with 33 points and hit eight threes.

Indiana’s perimeter production was more distributed.

Haliburton scored 26.

Nesmith added 19.

Nembhard scored 15.

McConnell contributed 18.

This is an important distinction.

Milwaukee received a huge perimeter scoring performance from Trent.

Indiana received multiple meaningful contributions.

Over 48 minutes plus overtime, that balance proved valuable.

What This Matchup Teaches About Playoff Basketball

The most useful lesson from these pacers vs milwaukee bucks match player stats is that playoff basketball rarely comes down to a single category.

Milwaukee won the rebounding battle.

Milwaukee dominated three-point shooting.

Giannis produced the most spectacular individual stat line.

Yet Indiana won.

Why?

Because the Pacers combined several smaller advantages:

Five fewer turnovers.
Better free-throw percentage.
More balanced scoring.
Strong bench production.
More steals.
Successful recovery from a huge first-quarter deficit.
Overtime execution.

No single advantage explains the result.

The interaction between those advantages does.

How to Analyze Similar NBA Player Stats

For readers using box scores to understand future playoff games, a useful approach is to work through the numbers in layers.

Step 1: Check the final score

Start with the obvious result, but do not stop there.

Step 2: Examine quarter scoring

This tells you whether the game was consistently controlled or changed dramatically.

Step 3: Compare shooting

Look at field goals, three-pointers and free throws separately.

Step 4: Check possessions

Turnovers and offensive rebounds can reveal hidden possession advantages.

Step 5: Examine star usage

Determine whether a team’s primary player was carrying an unusually large workload.

Step 6: Check the bench

A starter-heavy box score can sometimes hide an important reserve contribution.

Step 7: Look at defensive statistics

Steals and blocks do not capture all defensive impact, but they can help identify active defensive performances.

Step 8: Compare efficiency with volume

A player scoring 25 points on 20 shots has produced a different offensive performance from a player scoring 25 on 30 attempts.

This framework provides much more insight than simply looking at points.

Real-World Application of the Statistics

These numbers are useful for more than historical record keeping.

Fans can use them to understand why a game unfolded the way it did.

Analysts can use them to identify trends in team construction.

Fantasy basketball players can use individual workloads and statistical categories to understand player profiles.

Coaches and scouts can examine areas such as turnover creation, three-point volume and rebounding.

For example, this game demonstrates why a team cannot assume that excellent three-point shooting guarantees a win.

Milwaukee’s 19 made threes were outstanding.

But Indiana’s five-turnover advantage and superior free-throw percentage helped offset that edge.

Authoritative Data and Verification

For historical NBA game research, readers should cross-check official box-score information against established basketball databases and league records. The NBA’s official website is an appropriate primary source for league and game information.

When publishing this article, the supplied game data should remain the primary statistical reference, with any later corrections or official record adjustments checked against the league’s current records.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Pacers vs Bucks game on April 30, 2025?

The Indiana Pacers defeated the Milwaukee Bucks 119-118 in overtime at Gainbridge Fieldhouse.

Who was the leading scorer in the game?

Gary Trent Jr. led all scorers with 33 points for Milwaukee. Giannis Antetokounmpo scored 30, while Tyrese Haliburton led Indiana with 26.

What were Giannis Antetokounmpo’s stats?

Giannis recorded 30 points, 20 rebounds, 13 assists, two steals and two blocks in 44 minutes. He also committed seven turnovers.

How many points did Tyrese Haliburton score?

Tyrese Haliburton scored 26 points, along with five rebounds, nine assists, three steals and three blocks.

Who led the Pacers in rebounds?

Aaron Nesmith led Indiana with 12 rebounds. Myles Turner followed with nine.

What was the final series result?

Indiana won the Eastern Conference first-round series 4-1, eliminating Milwaukee after the 119-118 overtime victory in Game 5.

Conclusion

The pacers vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from April 30, 2025 reveal a game that was much closer and more complex than the final one-point margin suggests.

Milwaukee produced outstanding individual numbers. Giannis Antetokounmpo finished with 30 points, 20 rebounds and 13 assists, while Gary Trent Jr. scored 33 points and made eight three-pointers. The Bucks also won the rebounding battle and shot 47 percent from three.

Indiana answered in different ways.

Tyrese Haliburton delivered 26 points and nine assists while committing only one turnover. Myles Turner scored 21, Aaron Nesmith recorded 19 points and 12 rebounds, Andrew Nembhard added 15 points and six assists, and T.J. McConnell provided 18 points in only 17 minutes.

The Pacers also committed five fewer turnovers, shot better from the free-throw line, recorded more steals and received balanced scoring throughout the lineup.

Most importantly, Indiana overcame a 17-point first-quarter deficit and survived a one-point overtime finish.

The result was a 119-118 victory and a 4-1 series win, bringing Milwaukee’s postseason run to an end.