Dallas Mavericks vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats

The dallas mavericks vs phoenix suns match player stats from February 10, 2026, tell a much deeper story than the final 120-111 score. Phoenix built a huge first-half advantage, Dallas fought back strongly after halftime, and the Suns ultimately survived a late Mavericks surge. Dillon Brooks led Phoenix with 23 points, while Naji Marshall paced Dallas with 31 points. Cooper Flagg added 27 points for the Mavericks.

The game was played at the Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix, where 17,071 fans watched the Suns improve to 32-22 overall and 18-9 at home. Dallas fell to 19-34 and 5-18 on the road. The result also gave Phoenix a 2-0 advantage in the season series at that point.

For anyone studying the dallas mavericks vs phoenix suns match player stats, the most important details are not simply who scored the most points. Phoenix dominated the opening quarter, controlled the glass, created more assists, and made 16 three-pointers. Dallas, meanwhile, earned a massive free-throw advantage and nearly erased a 31-point deficit.

Dallas Mavericks vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats: Game Overview

Phoenix won 120-111 after starting the game with an explosive 36-point first quarter.

Dallas scored only 16 points during the opening period. That slow start created a hole that proved too large to completely overcome, even though the Mavericks scored 32 points in the second quarter and 36 in the fourth.

Here is the basic game summary:

Category	Dallas Mavericks	Phoenix Suns
Final Score	111	120
Q1	16	36
Q2	32	29
Q3	27	31
Q4	36	24
Field Goals	37-77	49-102
Field Goal %	48.1%	48.0%
3-Pointers	5-22	16-50
3-Point %	22.7%	32.0%
Free Throws	32-44	6-9
Rebounds	42	49
Assists	18	32
Turnovers	16	13
Steals	7	8
Blocks	5	3

The statistical contrast is interesting.

Both teams shot almost exactly 48% from the field. However, Phoenix attempted 102 field goals compared with only 77 for Dallas. That enormous difference in shot volume helped explain why the Suns scored 120 points despite Dallas getting far more opportunities at the free-throw line.

Phoenix also produced 32 assists compared with Dallas’ 18. That is a major indicator of how effectively the Suns moved the ball.

First Quarter Created the Difference

The first quarter was arguably the most important period of the entire game.

Phoenix outscored Dallas 36-16, creating a 20-point advantage after only 12 minutes. The Suns attacked aggressively and established control before Dallas could settle into the game.

Dillon Brooks was particularly important during this opening stretch. He scored 15 points in the first quarter, setting the tone for Phoenix’s offense.

Dallas struggled to generate enough efficient offense early. The Mavericks eventually recovered, but the opening deficit forced them to spend the rest of the game chasing.

This is one of the clearest lessons from the dallas mavericks vs phoenix suns match player stats. A team can shoot nearly the same overall field-goal percentage as its opponent and still lose comfortably if the opponent generates significantly more possessions and scoring opportunities.

Second Quarter: Dallas Starts Fighting Back

Dallas responded in the second quarter by scoring 32 points.

Phoenix still won the period 29-32? No. Dallas actually outscored Phoenix 32-29, cutting the deficit by three points.

That was not enough to erase the first-quarter damage, but it showed that the Mavericks were capable of attacking Phoenix’s defense.

At halftime, Phoenix still held a 17-point advantage.

The Suns entered the break with a strong position because their first-quarter dominance had created considerable room for error. Dallas needed a major second-half turnaround, and that is exactly what eventually developed.

Third Quarter Kept Phoenix Comfortable

The third quarter was another important period for Phoenix.

The Suns scored 31 points while Dallas managed 27. Phoenix therefore added another four points to its lead.

Instead of allowing Dallas to immediately turn the game into a close contest, Phoenix continued to produce enough offense to maintain control.

The Suns’ 3-point shooting also remained a major factor. Phoenix finished the game 16-of-50 from behind the arc, compared with only 5-of-22 for Dallas.

That means Phoenix made 11 more three-pointers than Dallas.

Because every made three is worth three points, that difference represented 33 additional points from three-point makes alone. Dallas made up some of that gap through free throws, but Phoenix’s perimeter production remained one of the biggest statistical reasons for the victory.

Fourth Quarter Produced a Furious Dallas Rally

The fourth quarter was where the game became genuinely competitive.

Dallas scored 36 points and limited Phoenix to 24. That gave the Mavericks a 12-point advantage in the final period.

The comeback became especially serious late in the game.

Dallas had been behind by as many as 31 points, but eventually reduced the deficit to six points. Naji Marshall played a major role in that push, while Cooper Flagg also contributed important scoring.

Phoenix, however, found enough late-game offense to avoid giving away the victory.

Devin Booker delivered crucial baskets down the stretch, including a mid-range jumper with around two minutes remaining. His scoring helped the Suns stabilize after Dallas had threatened to complete an extraordinary comeback.

The final margin was nine points, but the game was much more competitive late than the halftime score suggested.

Naji Marshall Led Dallas With 31 Points

Naji Marshall was Dallas’ top scorer with 31 points.

He was one of the central reasons the Mavericks were able to make the game competitive again after falling far behind early.

Marshall’s second-half production was particularly important. His scoring helped Dallas repeatedly reduce Phoenix’s advantage.

He also finished with eight rebounds, giving him an important contribution beyond scoring.

His performance is a good example of why player statistics should be viewed in context. A 31-point performance in a 120-111 loss does not tell the complete story, but it does show that Dallas had enough individual offensive production to challenge Phoenix late.

Cooper Flagg Added 27 Points

Cooper Flagg finished with 27 points for Dallas.

He shot 8-of-20 from the field and made 11-of-14 free throws. His free-throw production was especially notable because it demonstrated how aggressively he attacked the basket.

Flagg also recorded five rebounds, two assists, one steal, and three turnovers.

His 27 points came with a 40% field-goal percentage, but his 11 made free throws significantly increased his overall scoring output.

For a young player facing a large early deficit, his ability to continue attacking was an important part of Dallas’ comeback attempt.

Phoenix’s Dillon Brooks Set the Offensive Tone

Dillon Brooks led Phoenix with 23 points.

His first-quarter performance was particularly influential. Brooks scored 15 points in the opening period, helping Phoenix build its early advantage.

He finished with 23 points overall and provided the offensive aggression that Phoenix needed during the opening stages.

The Suns did not need one player to score 30 or more points because their offense was distributed across multiple contributors.

That balance became increasingly important as Dallas changed its defensive approach during the second half.

Devin Booker Provided Late Stability

Devin Booker scored 19 points for Phoenix.

He also contributed six assists, four rebounds, and two steals.

His scoring total was lower than Marshall’s or Flagg’s, but his influence was particularly valuable late in the game.

When Dallas reduced Phoenix’s lead to single digits, Booker delivered important shots that helped the Suns maintain control.

This is an important distinction when analyzing player performance. A player’s impact cannot always be measured by total points alone. Timing, playmaking, defensive activity, and late-game execution can have a major effect on the final result.

Oso Ighodaro Produced a Double-Double

Oso Ighodaro recorded one of Phoenix’s most efficient individual performances.

He scored 10 points and grabbed 10 rebounds for a double-double.

He shot 5-of-6 from the field, finishing at 83.3%.

Ighodaro also contributed four assists and two blocks.

His rebounding was especially important because Phoenix finished with 49 total rebounds compared with Dallas’ 42.

Six of Ighodaro’s rebounds came on the offensive glass, giving Phoenix additional possessions.

That type of contribution can easily be overlooked when focusing only on scoring leaders.

Collin Gillespie Controlled the Playmaking

Collin Gillespie led Phoenix with eight assists.

That number helps explain why the Suns finished with 32 assists as a team.

Phoenix’s ball movement was one of the biggest statistical differences between the teams. Dallas recorded only 18 assists.

The 14-assist advantage suggests that Phoenix generated a much larger share of its offense through coordinated team play.

That also helps explain the Suns’ 102 field-goal attempts. More ball movement, offensive rebounds, and possessions allowed Phoenix to keep generating opportunities.

Dallas Had a Huge Free-Throw Advantage

One of the strangest elements of the game was the free-throw disparity.

Dallas attempted 44 free throws.

Phoenix attempted only nine.

That gave Dallas a 35-attempt advantage.

The Mavericks converted 32 of those 44 attempts, while Phoenix made six of nine.

Dallas therefore scored 32 points from the free-throw line compared with six for Phoenix.

This was a massive advantage for Dallas, yet the Mavericks still lost.

That tells us how strong Phoenix’s advantages were in other areas.

The Suns compensated through:

• Three-point shooting
• Offensive rebounding
• Total field-goal attempts
• Assists
• Lower turnovers
• Strong first-quarter production

Phoenix’s ability to win despite such a major free-throw disadvantage was one of the most unusual aspects of the contest.

Three-Point Shooting Was a Major Difference

The perimeter numbers strongly favored Phoenix.

Dallas:

• 5-of-22 from three
• 22.7%

Phoenix:

• 16-of-50 from three
• 32.0%

Phoenix made 11 more three-pointers.

That is a huge difference in a game decided by nine points.

Even though Dallas received 26 more free-throw attempts, Phoenix’s three-point advantage helped offset that difference.

The Suns also had more total field-goal attempts because of their superior offensive rebounding and overall possession volume.

This is why looking only at field-goal percentage can be misleading.

Both teams were around 48% from the field, but Phoenix generated 25 more field-goal attempts.

Rebounding Gave Phoenix Extra Possessions

Phoenix finished with 49 rebounds.

Dallas finished with 42.

The seven-rebound advantage does not look enormous at first glance, but the offensive-rebounding difference was particularly significant.

Phoenix collected 18 offensive rebounds.

Dallas had eight.

That means Phoenix secured 10 more offensive rebounds.

Those extra possessions helped the Suns attempt 102 field goals.

This was one of the most important hidden advantages in the box score.

When a team misses a shot but recovers the rebound, the possession does not necessarily end. Phoenix repeatedly created second chances, and those additional opportunities helped compensate for Dallas’ free-throw advantage.

Assists Showed Phoenix’s Offensive Balance

Phoenix recorded 32 assists.

Dallas recorded 18.

That 14-assist difference is substantial.

Phoenix’s offense was not dependent on one scorer carrying the entire workload. Instead, the Suns generated scoring opportunities through multiple players.

Booker’s six assists and Gillespie’s eight assists were particularly important.

Oso Ighodaro also contributed four assists.

The overall result was an offense that consistently created opportunities for teammates.

Dallas, by comparison, had fewer assists and more turnovers.

That combination can make it difficult to sustain offensive efficiency against a team that is creating more clean opportunities.

Turnovers Also Favored Phoenix

Dallas committed 16 turnovers.

Phoenix committed 13.

The difference was only three turnovers, but it added to Phoenix’s overall possession advantage.

When combined with 18 offensive rebounds, the Suns had more ways to create additional possessions.

Dallas’ 16 turnovers also mattered because the Mavericks were already struggling to generate three-point offense.

A team can survive missed shots if it creates second chances. Turnovers, however, give the opponent an opportunity to attack before the defense is fully established.

Team Comparison From the Box Score

The overall statistical comparison shows why Phoenix won.

Statistic	Dallas	Phoenix	Advantage
Points	111	120	Phoenix
FG%	48.1%	48.0%	Dallas
3P%	22.7%	32.0%	Phoenix
Free Throws Made	32	6	Dallas
Rebounds	42	49	Phoenix
Assists	18	32	Phoenix
Turnovers	16	13	Phoenix
Steals	7	8	Phoenix
Blocks	5	3	Dallas

Dallas clearly won the free-throw battle.

Phoenix won almost everything else that affected possession volume and offensive creation.

That is the central statistical explanation for the result.

Why Phoenix Won Despite Making Fewer Free Throws

At first glance, it may seem strange that Phoenix could win while attempting only nine free throws.

The explanation becomes clearer when the entire box score is considered.

Phoenix made 49 field goals.

Dallas made 37.

That is a difference of 12 made field goals.

Phoenix also made 16 three-pointers compared with five by Dallas.

The Suns grabbed seven more rebounds overall and 10 more offensive rebounds.

They also produced 14 more assists and committed three fewer turnovers.

Dallas had the advantage at the foul line, but Phoenix created significantly more scoring opportunities from the field.

That is why the final result was not determined by free-throw volume alone.

Dallas’ Comeback Deserves Attention

The final score should not hide how impressive Dallas’ comeback attempt was.

Phoenix had built a 31-point advantage.

Dallas eventually brought the deficit down to six.

That required significant offensive improvement and defensive resistance.

The Mavericks scored 36 points in the fourth quarter, their highest-scoring period of the game.

They also held Phoenix to 24 points during that period.

That combination transformed a potential blowout into a competitive finish.

However, the comeback required Dallas to overcome too much early damage.

The lesson is simple: late-game momentum can change the appearance of a box score, but it does not erase the consequences of a disastrous opening quarter.

What the Player Stats Say About Dallas

The individual numbers suggest that Dallas had enough scoring talent to compete.

Marshall scored 31.

Flagg scored 27.

P.J. Washington and Khris Middleton each added 13.

However, Dallas lacked the same level of offensive distribution as Phoenix.

The Mavericks produced only 18 assists.

They also struggled from three-point range, making just five shots from deep.

That combination placed greater pressure on individual players to create offense.

The team’s 44 free-throw attempts helped keep the Mavericks alive, but they needed better perimeter production to fully capitalize on those opportunities.

What the Player Stats Say About Phoenix

Phoenix’s numbers tell a different story.

Brooks led the team with 23 points.

Booker scored 19 and added six assists.

Ighodaro delivered 10 points and 10 rebounds.

Gillespie produced eight assists.

The Suns also received meaningful contributions from other players, allowing them to maintain offensive balance.

Their 16 made three-pointers were especially valuable.

Phoenix did not need one enormous scoring performance because the team created a high volume of attempts and moved the ball effectively.

A Closer Look at the Shooting Volume

One of the most important numbers in this matchup was not shooting percentage.

It was shot attempts.

Dallas attempted 77 field goals.

Phoenix attempted 102.

That is a difference of 25 attempts.

Even with both teams shooting approximately 48%, 25 additional attempts create a major scoring opportunity gap.

Phoenix’s 18 offensive rebounds were a major reason for that volume.

Dallas’ lower offensive-rebound total limited its ability to generate second chances.

This is an important point for readers searching for dallas mavericks vs phoenix suns match player stats because box-score analysis should go beyond percentages.

Efficiency matters, but volume matters too.

The Importance of the First Quarter

If there is one number that best explains the game, it may be the opening score.

Phoenix 36, Dallas 16.

That 20-point difference gave Phoenix the freedom to withstand Dallas’ later comeback.

The Suns did not need to dominate every quarter.

They only needed to protect the advantage they created early.

Dallas eventually outscored Phoenix by 12 points in the fourth quarter, but that was not enough because the Mavericks had already fallen too far behind.

Season Series Context

The victory gave Phoenix a 2-0 advantage over Dallas in the 2025-26 season series at that point.

The Suns had also won the earlier meeting 123-114 in Dallas on November 12, 2025.

Therefore, the February result was not an isolated success.

Phoenix had demonstrated an ability to beat Dallas in both teams’ first two meetings of the season.

The broader matchup context made the 120-111 result even more significant for evaluating the season series.

What Fans Should Take From the Box Score

The biggest lesson is that one statistic rarely explains an NBA game.

Dallas had a massive advantage at the free-throw line.

Yet Phoenix won.

Dallas shot slightly better overall from the field.

Yet Phoenix won.

Dallas made 32 free throws.

Yet Phoenix won.

The Suns achieved victory through a combination of:

1. A dominant opening quarter
2. Superior three-point shooting
3. More offensive rebounds
4. More total field-goal attempts
5. Better ball movement
6. Fewer turnovers
7. Strong late-game execution

That combination created enough separation to survive Dallas’ fourth-quarter rally.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Mavericks vs Suns game?

Naji Marshall was Dallas’ leading scorer with 31 points. Phoenix was led by Dillon Brooks with 23 points.

What was the final score between Dallas and Phoenix?

The Phoenix Suns defeated the Dallas Mavericks 120-111 on February 10, 2026, at the Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix.

How many points did Cooper Flagg score?

Cooper Flagg scored 27 points. He shot 8-of-20 from the field and made 11 of his 14 free-throw attempts.

Who led the Suns in assists?

Collin Gillespie led Phoenix with eight assists. Devin Booker also contributed six assists.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Oso Ighodaro led Phoenix with 10 rebounds and recorded a double-double with 10 points. Dallas’ leading rebounder was Naji Marshall with eight rebounds.

Why did Phoenix beat Dallas?

Phoenix won because it created significantly more field-goal opportunities, made 16 three-pointers compared with Dallas’ five, collected 49 rebounds, recorded 32 assists, and built a 20-point first-quarter advantage.

Conclusion

The dallas mavericks vs phoenix suns match player stats show a game defined by contrasting strengths.

Dallas received outstanding scoring performances from Naji Marshall and Cooper Flagg. The Mavericks also earned an enormous free-throw advantage and produced a strong fourth-quarter comeback.

Phoenix, however, created the stronger overall statistical profile.

The Suns shot 16-of-50 from three, collected 49 rebounds, recorded 32 assists, and attempted 102 field goals. Their 36-point first quarter created the foundation for the victory.

The most revealing statistic may be the 18 offensive rebounds Phoenix collected. Those second chances helped the Suns generate the huge difference in shot attempts that ultimately outweighed Dallas’ free-throw advantage.

For Phoenix, the 120-111 victory demonstrated the value of balanced offense, rebounding, perimeter shooting, and early-game execution. For Dallas, the comeback showed resilience, but the 20-point first-quarter deficit proved too costly to overcome.

The official NBA box score and game summary provides the complete statistical record for the matchup.