Pacers vs 76ers Match Player Stats

The pacers vs 76ers match player stats from January 20, 2026, tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Philadelphia defeated Indiana 113-104 at Xfinity Mobile Arena, but the game was shaped by several contrasting statistical trends. The 76ers received major scoring contributions from Joel Embiid and Tyrese Maxey, while Andrew Nembhard and Pascal Siakam led the Pacers offensively. Philadelphia also created a huge advantage in steals and turnovers, which ultimately helped offset Indiana’s stronger three-point shooting.

This game is particularly useful for understanding how individual production, team efficiency, ball security, and defensive activity can combine to decide an NBA matchup. Indiana shot 48 percent from the field and 38 percent from three, matching Philadelphia’s overall 48 percent field-goal percentage. Yet the Pacers committed 22 turnovers compared with only 8 for the 76ers. Philadelphia also recorded 18 steals, compared with just 4 for Indiana.

Those numbers explain why the box score deserves to be examined beyond points scored.

Table of Contents

Pacers vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The January 20 meeting was the second game of the 2025-26 season series between Philadelphia and Indiana. Philadelphia entered the contest with a 23-18 record and an 11-11 home mark, while Indiana was 10-34 overall and 2-18 on the road.

Philadelphia eventually won 113-104.

The basic game information was:

Category	Details
Game	Philadelphia 76ers vs. Indiana Pacers
Date	January 20, 2026
Final Score	76ers 113, Pacers 104
Venue	Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia, PA
Attendance	18,005
Game ID	401810464
Pacers Record	10-34
Pacers Away Record	2-18
76ers Record	23-18
76ers Home Record	11-11

The final nine-point margin does not fully capture the statistical separation between the teams. Both clubs made 42 or fewer field goals, both shot 48 percent from the field, and Indiana actually had the better three-point percentage.

The decisive difference came from possessions.

Philadelphia’s 18 steals contributed directly to Indiana’s 22 turnovers. The 76ers, by comparison, turned the ball over only eight times. That created a 14-turnover difference, giving Philadelphia many more opportunities to score without needing to win the shooting battle.

That is one of the most important lessons from this matchup: shooting percentage can look nearly identical while possession quality creates a meaningful difference in the final result.

Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Philadelphia did not dominate every quarter.

The game developed in four distinct stretches:

Quarter	Pacers	76ers
Q1	30	33
Q2	25	17
Q3	26	32
Q4	23	31
Final	104	113

Philadelphia started with a three-point advantage after the opening period, but Indiana responded strongly in the second quarter.

The Pacers scored 25 points in the second while holding Philadelphia to 17. That eight-point swing meant Indiana entered halftime with momentum despite trailing 50-55.

The third quarter changed the direction again.

Philadelphia scored 32 points while Indiana produced 26. The six-point advantage restored control for the 76ers and moved the game toward a fourth-quarter finish in which Philadelphia extended its lead further.

The fourth quarter was particularly important. Philadelphia outscored Indiana 31-23, producing the eight-point difference that helped turn a competitive game into a nine-point final margin.

Why the Second Half Mattered

The Pacers had opportunities to make the game tighter, but Philadelphia’s second-half scoring was more consistent.

Philadelphia scored:

32 points in the third quarter
31 points in the fourth quarter

That means the 76ers produced 63 points after halftime.

Indiana scored 49 points across the same two quarters.

The 14-point second-half scoring difference was therefore larger than the final nine-point margin. Indiana’s stronger second quarter helped keep the game competitive, but Philadelphia controlled the final two periods.

Top Scorers for the Pacers

Andrew Nembhard led Indiana with 25 points, while Pascal Siakam followed with 24.

Their combined scoring total was 49 points.

That means Nembhard and Siakam accounted for almost half of Indiana’s 104 points. Their production was essential because Indiana did not receive the same top-end scoring balance from its leading players that Philadelphia received.

Andrew Nembhard: 25 Points

Nembhard was Indiana’s leading scorer with 25 points.

From an individual scoring perspective, that was an important performance because the Pacers needed efficient offensive production against a Philadelphia team capable of generating defensive pressure.

Nembhard’s 25 points placed him only four points behind Philadelphia’s leading scorer, Joel Embiid.

That comparison is useful because it shows that Indiana’s primary scorer was competitive on the scoring leaderboard. The larger difference between the teams came from what happened around those scoring performances.

Pascal Siakam: 24 Points

Siakam finished with 24 points, only one behind Nembhard.

Together, the two Indiana leaders supplied nearly half of the team’s scoring. Their production gave the Pacers a strong foundation, particularly considering Indiana shot 48 percent overall.

The challenge was maintaining possession.

A team can generate efficient shots and still struggle to convert that efficiency into a winning performance when turnovers repeatedly remove scoring opportunities.

That is exactly what happened here.

Top Scorers for the 76ers

Philadelphia had three significant scoring contributors.

Joel Embiid led the team with 30 points, Tyrese Maxey scored 29, and Kelly Oubre Jr. added 18.

Player	Team	Points
Joel Embiid	76ers	30
Tyrese Maxey	76ers	29
Kelly Oubre Jr.	76ers	18
Andrew Nembhard	Pacers	25
Pascal Siakam	Pacers	24

Embiid and Maxey combined for 59 points.

That was 10 more points than Indiana’s two leading scorers combined.

This difference is meaningful because Philadelphia’s top two scorers were not merely productive individually. Their combined output represented more than half of the team’s 113 points.

Joel Embiid: 30 Points

Embiid was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 30 points.

A 30-point performance from a team’s primary interior and offensive focal point can change the structure of a defense because opposing players have to account for his scoring threat throughout the game.

In this matchup, Embiid’s 30 points gave Philadelphia the highest individual scoring total on either team.

The important statistical takeaway is not simply that he led the game in scoring. It is that Philadelphia had another player nearly match him.

Tyrese Maxey: 29 Points

Maxey finished with 29 points, one point behind Embiid.

That gave Philadelphia two players within one point of each other at the top of its scoring chart.

This balance reduced the pressure on any single scorer to carry the offense.

Embiid and Maxey combined for 59 points, while Oubre added another 18. Those three players therefore scored 77 of Philadelphia’s 113 points.

That represents a substantial concentration of the 76ers’ offensive production among their leading contributors.

Kelly Oubre Jr.: 18 Points

Oubre’s 18 points provided another important scoring layer.

While his total was 11 points below Maxey’s and 12 below Embiid’s, his contribution meant Indiana could not focus exclusively on Philadelphia’s two leading scorers.

That kind of third-option production can become particularly valuable in a game where turnovers and defensive pressure create additional possessions.

Team Shooting Comparison

One of the most interesting aspects of the matchup is how similar the teams were in overall field-goal efficiency.

Category	Pacers	76ers
Field Goals	40-84	42-88
FG Percentage	48%	48%
Three-Pointers	13-34	5-17
3PT Percentage	38%	29%
Free Throws	11-14	24-36

At first glance, Indiana’s shooting numbers appear highly competitive.

Both teams shot 48 percent from the field.

Indiana also had a clear advantage from three-point range, making 13 of 34 attempts compared with Philadelphia’s 5 of 17.

That translated to:

Indiana: 38% from three
Philadelphia: 29% from three

So why did Philadelphia win?

The answer starts with turnovers and continues with free throws.

Indiana’s Three-Point Advantage

The Pacers made eight more three-pointers than Philadelphia.

That is a significant difference.

Indiana converted 13 three-point attempts, while Philadelphia made only 5.

If the game had been decided primarily by perimeter shooting, Indiana’s advantage would have been extremely important.

But three-point production was only one part of the offensive equation.

Philadelphia compensated through:

More free-throw attempts
Better ball security
More defensive takeaways
Strong scoring from its top two players

The 76ers attempted 36 free throws and made 24.

Indiana attempted only 14 and made 11.

Philadelphia therefore had 22 more free-throw attempts.

That is a major possession and scoring opportunity difference.

The Turnover Battle Was the Defining Statistical Difference

The turnover numbers deserve special attention.

Indiana committed 22 turnovers.

Philadelphia committed only 8.

That created a 14-turnover advantage for the 76ers.

The defensive numbers reinforce the same story.

Philadelphia recorded 18 steals.

Indiana recorded 4.

The 14-steal difference is exactly the same as the 14-turnover difference between the teams.

This alignment strongly highlights how Philadelphia disrupted Indiana’s possession game.

It also explains why a team can shoot 38 percent from three and still win comfortably against an opponent shooting 48 percent from the field and 38 percent from deep.

The Pacers were efficient when they completed possessions. The problem was that too many possessions ended before a shot could be taken.

Possession Quality Versus Shooting Efficiency

This matchup provides a useful example for readers who want to understand NBA box scores at a deeper level.

Suppose two teams shoot almost exactly the same percentage from the field.

That does not mean they had equally effective offensive games.

You also need to consider:

Turnovers
Offensive rebounds
Free throws
Three-point volume
Steals
Total shot attempts

Here, Indiana had 84 field-goal attempts and Philadelphia had 88.

The shooting volume was relatively close.

But Philadelphia’s eight turnovers were dramatically lower than Indiana’s 22.

The 76ers also earned far more free throws.

This means Philadelphia was able to turn its possessions into scoring opportunities more consistently.

That is one reason raw field-goal percentage can sometimes hide the real story of an NBA game.

Rebounding Comparison

Indiana actually won the overall rebounding battle.

The Pacers collected 46 rebounds.

Philadelphia collected 40.

Team	Rebounds
Pacers	46
76ers	40

This is another important part of the statistical picture.

Philadelphia did not win because it dominated every traditional category.

Indiana had:

More rebounds
More made three-pointers
Better three-point percentage
The same overall field-goal percentage

Yet Philadelphia still won.

That makes the turnover and free-throw differences even more important.

A strong rebounding performance can provide extra opportunities, but those opportunities have to be protected and converted. Indiana’s 22 turnovers worked against the value of its six-rebound advantage.

Assists and Offensive Ball Movement

Indiana finished with 24 assists.

Philadelphia had 22.

The Pacers therefore had a two-assist advantage.

That statistic adds another layer to the game because Philadelphia’s victory was not based on simply having more assists.

In fact, Indiana’s assist total was higher.

This is a useful reminder that assists should be viewed in context.

A team can move the ball effectively and still lose if turnovers cancel out the value of that ball movement.

Indiana’s 24 assists were solid, but the 22 turnovers created a very different possession profile.

Philadelphia’s 22 assists were accompanied by only 8 turnovers.

That is a much cleaner offensive ratio from a possession standpoint.

Defensive Production

The defensive statistical contrast was striking.

Defensive Category	Pacers	76ers
Steals	4	18
Blocks	9	5

Indiana recorded four more blocks than Philadelphia.

Philadelphia, however, recorded 14 more steals.

That tradeoff illustrates two different types of defensive activity.

Blocks often occur around the rim and prevent individual shots from being converted. Steals can immediately change possession and create transition opportunities.

In this particular game, Philadelphia’s steals were directly connected to Indiana’s unusually high turnover total.

The 76ers’ defensive activity therefore had a clear connection to the game’s possession battle.

Free Throws and Why They Mattered

The free-throw numbers are another major difference.

Philadelphia:

Attempted 36
Made 24
Shot 67%

Indiana:

Attempted 14
Made 11
Shot 79%

Indiana was more accurate from the free-throw line.

But Philadelphia had 22 more attempts.

That volume mattered more than the difference in accuracy.

The 76ers scored 24 points at the free-throw line.

Indiana scored 11.

That produced a 13-point advantage for Philadelphia in free-throw scoring alone.

The Pacers made more of their attempts, but Philadelphia had many more opportunities.

This is an important distinction when analyzing individual and team statistics.

Accuracy tells you how well a team converted its chances. Volume tells you how often it created those chances.

Both matter.

Why Indiana’s Three-Point Shooting Was Not Enough

Indiana’s 13 made three-pointers were a significant offensive positive.

The Pacers made eight more threes than Philadelphia.

However, Philadelphia still finished with nine more total points.

This shows how different scoring methods can offset one another.

Indiana’s advantage from long range was partially neutralized by Philadelphia’s:

24 made free throws
42 made field goals
30-point performance from Embiid
29-point performance from Maxey
18 steals
Low turnover total

Philadelphia did not need to win the three-point battle because it won other possession and scoring categories.

A Closer Look at the Four Quarters

First Quarter

Philadelphia opened with 33 points against Indiana’s 30.

The Pacers were still highly competitive offensively, scoring 30 points in the opening period.

Neither side established a major early advantage.

Second Quarter

Indiana reversed the momentum.

The Pacers scored 25 points while limiting Philadelphia to 17.

That gave Indiana an eight-point advantage in the quarter and allowed it to make the game much closer.

The second quarter was arguably Indiana’s most successful stretch of the contest.

Third Quarter

Philadelphia responded immediately after halftime.

The 76ers scored 32 points compared with Indiana’s 26.

That six-point difference helped restore Philadelphia’s control.

Fourth Quarter

Philadelphia finished strongly.

The 76ers scored 31 points in the fourth while Indiana managed 23.

That eight-point difference was crucial.

The Pacers had already shown during the second quarter that they could produce a strong offensive stretch. Philadelphia’s ability to maintain its scoring level late in the game prevented Indiana from completing a comeback.

Season Series Context

The January 20 game was the second meeting of the season between the teams.

Philadelphia won all four games in the 2025-26 season series according to the supplied results:

Game	Date	Result
Game 1	December 13	76ers 115, Pacers 105
Game 2	January 20	76ers 113, Pacers 104
Game 3	February 25	76ers 135, Pacers 114
Game 4	April 11	76ers 105, Pacers 94

The second meeting therefore followed the pattern established in the first game, when Philadelphia also won by double digits.

Across the supplied season-series results, Philadelphia won by 10 points in the first meeting and nine in the second.

The later meetings were also decided by Philadelphia, including a 21-point margin in the February matchup.

For readers researching individual game statistics, this broader context is useful because it shows that the January result was part of a larger season series rather than an isolated meeting.

What the Player Stats Reveal

The most useful way to interpret this game is to combine individual scoring with team-level statistics.

Philadelphia’s leading scorers were:

Joel Embiid: 30
Tyrese Maxey: 29
Kelly Oubre Jr.: 18

Indiana’s leading scorers were:

Andrew Nembhard: 25
Pascal Siakam: 24

Philadelphia’s top two scorers combined for 59 points.

Indiana’s top two combined for 49.

That 10-point difference was slightly larger than the final nine-point margin.

However, the biggest team-level separation was not scoring.

It was possession control.

Philadelphia committed only 8 turnovers against Indiana’s 22.

That 14-possession difference was accompanied by an 18-4 advantage in steals.

This combination gives the individual scoring statistics more context.

The Most Important Numbers at a Glance

For someone researching the matchup quickly, these are the statistics worth remembering:

Final score: 76ers 113, Pacers 104

Leading scorer: Joel Embiid, 30 points

Second-highest scorer: Tyrese Maxey, 29 points

Pacers leading scorer: Andrew Nembhard, 25 points

Pacers second-leading scorer: Pascal Siakam, 24 points

76ers third-leading scorer: Kelly Oubre Jr., 18 points

Field-goal percentage: 48% for both teams

Three-point percentage: Pacers 38%, 76ers 29%

Rebounds: Pacers 46, 76ers 40

Assists: Pacers 24, 76ers 22

Turnovers: Pacers 22, 76ers 8

Steals: Pacers 4, 76ers 18

Blocks: Pacers 9, 76ers 5

Free throws made: Pacers 11, 76ers 24

These figures explain the result far better than the final score alone.

How to Read This Box Score Correctly

One of the easiest mistakes in sports analysis is to focus on the most visually impressive number.

For this game, that number might be Indiana’s 38 percent three-point shooting.

It could also be the Pacers’ 46 rebounds.

Or it could be Embiid’s 30 points.

But none of those statistics alone explains the result.

The better approach is to identify which numbers affected possession value.

Philadelphia’s 18 steals and Indiana’s 22 turnovers immediately stand out.

Then the free-throw difference adds another explanation.

Only after considering those numbers does the shooting comparison become fully meaningful.

This is a useful method for analyzing almost any NBA box score:

Check the final score.
Compare shooting percentages.
Check three-point volume and accuracy.
Examine turnovers.
Examine free-throw attempts.
Compare rebounds.
Review assists and steals.
Identify which individual players drove the result.
Compare the quarter-by-quarter scoring.
Put the game into its season context.

That process gives a much more complete picture than simply looking at the top scorer.

Real-World Takeaways From the Matchup

The January 20 contest offers several practical lessons for anyone studying NBA player statistics.

1. Efficient shooting does not guarantee victory

Indiana shot 48 percent from the field and 38 percent from three.

Those are respectable offensive numbers.

Yet the Pacers lost because other areas of the game worked against them.

2. Turnovers can erase shooting advantages

Indiana’s 22 turnovers were a major problem.

Philadelphia’s 8 turnovers meant the 76ers protected possessions much more effectively.

3. Free-throw volume can offset three-point disadvantages

Philadelphia made only five three-pointers.

Indiana made 13.

Despite that eight-three-pointer difference, Philadelphia won because it made 24 free throws compared with Indiana’s 11.

4. One star is not always enough

Nembhard scored 25 and Siakam scored 24.

Those performances were strong individually.

Philadelphia, however, had Embiid at 30 and Maxey at 29.

The 76ers received comparable high-end production from two players at the same time.

5. Defensive statistics can explain offensive results

Philadelphia’s 18 steals were not merely a defensive footnote.

They were directly associated with Indiana’s 22 turnovers and helped create additional scoring opportunities.

Author’s Statistical Perspective

When analyzing NBA games, I find it more useful to connect categories instead of treating each box-score statistic as an isolated fact.

This game is a strong example.

If you only looked at field-goal percentage, the teams appeared almost identical.

If you looked only at three-point shooting, Indiana had a clear advantage.

If you looked only at rebounds, Indiana again had the edge.

But the overall result changes when you connect those statistics with turnovers, steals, and free throws.

That is why a good player-stat analysis should answer two questions:

Who performed well?

And more importantly:

Which performances and team tendencies actually changed the game?

In this matchup, Embiid and Maxey clearly supplied Philadelphia’s scoring leadership. Nembhard and Siakam carried much of Indiana’s scoring load. But Philadelphia’s defensive disruption and superior ball security helped turn those individual performances into a winning team performance.

For an official statistical reference, readers can cross-check NBA game and player information through NBA.com.

FAQs

Who was the leading scorer in the Pacers vs 76ers game on January 20, 2026?

Joel Embiid led all scorers with 30 points for Philadelphia. Tyrese Maxey followed with 29 points.

Who led the Pacers in scoring?

Andrew Nembhard led Indiana with 25 points. Pascal Siakam was second with 24 points.

What was the final score between the 76ers and Pacers?

Philadelphia defeated Indiana 113-104 on January 20, 2026.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Indiana shot better from three-point range, making 13 of 34 attempts for 38 percent. Philadelphia made 5 of 17 for 29 percent.

Which team had more turnovers?

Indiana had 22 turnovers, while Philadelphia had only 8.

Why did Philadelphia win despite making fewer three-pointers?

Philadelphia compensated through strong scoring from Embiid and Maxey, 24 made free throws, 18 steals, and much better ball security. Indiana’s 22 turnovers also reduced its offensive opportunities.

Conclusion

The pacers vs 76ers match player stats from January 20, 2026, show why a complete NBA analysis needs more than a scoring leaderboard.

Philadelphia won 113-104 behind 30 points from Joel Embiid and 29 from Tyrese Maxey, while Kelly Oubre Jr. added 18. Indiana received 25 points from Andrew Nembhard and 24 from Pascal Siakam.

The shooting numbers were surprisingly close overall. Both teams shot 48 percent from the field, while Indiana held a substantial advantage from three-point range. The Pacers also won the rebounding battle and finished with more assists.

Philadelphia separated itself through possession control.

The 76ers committed only 8 turnovers compared with Indiana’s 22. They also recorded 18 steals against just 4 for the Pacers and made 24 free throws compared with Indiana’s 11. Those categories helped compensate for Philadelphia’s weaker three-point shooting.

The quarter-by-quarter numbers add another important layer. Indiana’s strongest period came in the second quarter, when it outscored Philadelphia 25-17. Philadelphia responded in the second half, winning both the third and fourth quarters and finishing the game with a 31-23 fourth-quarter advantage.

For anyone studying this matchup, the central lesson is clear: individual scoring matters, but the surrounding possession statistics often explain the final result. Embiid and Maxey provided Philadelphia’s scoring foundation, while defensive pressure, ball security, and free-throw opportunities helped determine how that production translated into a nine-point victory.