New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats

The new york liberty vs indiana fever match player stats tell the story of a competitive WNBA contest in which the New York Liberty defeated the Indiana Fever 109-102 on August 23, 2026, according to the supplied game record. Played at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, the matchup featured outstanding scoring performances from Kelsey Mitchell, Breanna Stewart, Aliyah Boston, Caitlin Clark, and Leonie Fiebich. Although Indiana produced better ball security and recorded more assists and steals, New York made better use of its rebounding opportunities and free throws to secure the seven-point victory. Both teams demonstrated impressive offensive efficiency, making this one of the most interesting games in their 2026 regular-season series.

The final score was only part of the story. Indiana finished with 40 successful field goals, compared with New York’s 37. Both teams converted 11 three-point shots. However, the Liberty made 24 of their 29 free throws, while the Fever converted just 11 of 22 attempts. That difference proved especially important because New York won despite committing six more turnovers.

This detailed breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, starting lineups, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter results, shooting efficiency, and the broader significance of the season series. It also explains which statistical areas separated the two teams and what the numbers reveal about their performances.

New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The August 23 matchup brought two competitive teams together at Barclays Center. New York entered the game with a 23-15 overall record and a strong 13-5 home record. Indiana arrived with a 24-14 record, including an 11-8 mark away from home.

The teams had already played three times during the season. Their previous meetings had produced two Indiana victories and one New York victory. Consequently, this fourth meeting carried additional importance for their season-series standings.

New York ultimately secured a 109-102 victory, bringing the season series to a 2-2 tie.

Match Information

Match Detail	Information
Competition	WNBA
Home Team	New York Liberty
Away Team	Indiana Fever
Match Date	August 23, 2026
Match Time	4:00 AM
Venue	Barclays Center
Location	Brooklyn, New York
Attendance	17,581
Final Score	Liberty 109, Fever 102
Match Status	Final
ESPN Game ID	401857164
Indiana Record	24-14
New York Record	23-15
Indiana Away Record	11-8
New York Home Record	13-5
Season Series	2-2
Broadcast Information	Prime Video

Date clarification: The supplied record lists the game as August 23 at 4:00 AM. The official WNBA game listing identifies the contest as August 22 in the United States. This is a local-time and timezone difference rather than a separate game.

The contest attracted 17,581 spectators, creating a strong home-court setting for the Liberty.

Final Score

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
Indiana Fever	26	23	29	24	102
New York Liberty	33	20	32	24	109

New York established an early advantage by scoring 33 points in the opening quarter. Indiana responded in the second period, reducing the deficit by three points.

The Liberty then produced another productive offensive quarter, scoring 32 points in the third. Both teams scored 24 points in the fourth, meaning Indiana could not overcome the seven-point difference established during the earlier periods.

New York Liberty Player Statistics

The Liberty received important contributions from several players rather than depending entirely on one offensive option.

Breanna Stewart led New York with 22 points and seven assists. Leonie Fiebich added 20 points, while Jonquel Jones recorded 19 points and a double-double with 10 rebounds.

The distribution of scoring was particularly important. Three Liberty players reached at least 19 points, giving Indiana multiple offensive threats to manage.

New York Liberty Player Performance Table

Player	Position	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Breanna Stewart	Forward	22	8	7
Leonie Fiebich	Forward	20	5	5
Jonquel Jones	Center/Forward	19	10	1
Sabrina Ionescu	Guard	12	3	4
Pauline Astier	Guard	8	3	2
Rebecca Allen	Guard/Forward	9	1	0
Marine Johannes	Guard	6	2	4
Han Xu	Center	9	1	0
Rebekah Gardner	Guard	4	1	1
Raquel Carrera	Forward	Not provided	Not provided	Not provided
Marine Fauthoux	Guard	Not provided	Not provided	Not provided

Note: The supplied summary identifies the main statistical leaders but does not provide complete individual box-score figures for every player. Unavailable individual statistics have not been invented.

Breanna Stewart Leads New York With 22 Points

22 POINTS | 8 REBOUNDS | 7 ASSISTS

Breanna Stewart delivered one of the most complete performances of the evening.

Her 22 points made her New York’s leading scorer. However, her contribution extended beyond putting the ball through the basket. She also collected eight rebounds and distributed seven assists.

That combination demonstrated her importance as both a scoring option and a playmaker.

Stewart’s seven assists were particularly valuable because they helped New York maintain an offensive structure involving several players. Rather than relying exclusively on individual scoring, the Liberty had multiple ways to generate opportunities.

Her eight rebounds also helped New York compete for possession against Indiana’s frontcourt players.

One important detail is that Stewart finished with more assists than any other Liberty player. Her performance therefore combined three major responsibilities:

• Creating scoring opportunities.
• Contributing to defensive and offensive rebounding.
• Providing consistent offensive production.

Her 22-point performance established a reliable foundation for the Liberty’s attack.

Leonie Fiebich Contributes 20 Points

20 POINTS | 5 REBOUNDS | 5 ASSISTS

Leonie Fiebich delivered another important performance for New York.

She finished with 20 points, five rebounds, and five assists. Reaching 20 points gave the Liberty another dependable scoring option alongside Stewart.

Fiebich’s five assists were equally valuable because they demonstrated her ability to contribute to team offense beyond shooting.

Her balanced production helped prevent Indiana from focusing its defensive attention on Stewart alone.

A team with multiple players capable of scoring 20 points becomes more difficult to defend. Opponents must account for different offensive threats, which can create additional space and passing opportunities.

Fiebich’s performance was a major part of New York’s balanced scoring attack.

Jonquel Jones Records a Double-Double

19 POINTS | 10 REBOUNDS

Jonquel Jones delivered a productive performance in the frontcourt.

She scored 19 points and collected 10 rebounds, recording a double-double.

Her rebounding contribution was particularly important because New York finished with a seven-rebound advantage over Indiana.

Jones was also one of the Liberty’s most efficient free-throw contributors. The supplied game data shows that New York converted 24 of its 29 attempts from the free-throw line.

Her scoring and rebounding helped the Liberty maintain pressure inside the paint.

The double-double also highlights why evaluating a center or forward only through points can provide an incomplete picture. Rebounding creates additional possessions, limits second chances for opponents, and can influence the overall rhythm of a game.

Sabrina Ionescu Adds Valuable Offensive Support

12 POINTS | 3 REBOUNDS | 4 ASSISTS

Sabrina Ionescu contributed 12 points, three rebounds, and four assists.

Although she was not New York’s leading scorer, her contribution helped maintain offensive balance.

Her four assists supported the team’s overall ball movement. She also provided another perimeter scoring threat, making it harder for Indiana to concentrate exclusively on Stewart and Fiebich.

Ionescu’s performance demonstrates the importance of supporting production in a game where the leading scorers receive most of the attention.

New York’s Bench Contributions

The Liberty also received useful production from their reserves.

Han Xu scored nine points, while Rebecca Allen added nine. Marine Johannes contributed six points and four assists, and Rebekah Gardner added four points.

These contributions helped New York maintain offensive production beyond its starting lineup.

Han Xu’s nine points were particularly noteworthy because bench scoring can become important when starters need rest or opponents adjust their defensive approach.

The combined production from different players gave New York additional scoring flexibility.

Indiana Fever Player Statistics

Indiana entered the contest with several established offensive threats.

Kelsey Mitchell led the Fever with 25 points. Aliyah Boston contributed 22 points, while Caitlin Clark finished with 21 points and seven assists.

Together, the three players scored 68 points.

That represented approximately two-thirds of Indiana’s final offensive production.

The Fever also demonstrated impressive shooting efficiency, finishing with 40 successful field goals from 70 attempts.

However, their free-throw performance created a significant problem. Indiana converted only half of its attempts from the line, leaving important scoring opportunities unused.

Indiana Fever Player Performance Table

Player	Position	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Kelsey Mitchell	Guard	25	0	4
Aliyah Boston	Center	22	3	6
Caitlin Clark	Guard	21	4	7
Makayla Timpson	Forward	10	6	0
Lexie Hull	Guard/Forward	0	2	1
Sophie Cunningham	Guard	10	2	5
Tyasha Harris	Guard	6	1	0
Myisha Hines-Allen	Forward	4	7	1
Monique Billings	Forward	4	2	1
Mercedes Russell	Center	0	0	0
Grace VanSlooten	Forward	DNP	DNP	DNP
Michelle Onyiah	Center	DNP	DNP	DNP
Raven Johnson	Guard	DNP	DNP	DNP
Bree Hall	Guard	DNP	DNP	DNP

DNP means Did Not Play. The supplied summary does not provide individual statistics for every player, so missing values are not estimated.

Kelsey Mitchell Leads Indiana With 25 Points

25 POINTS | 4 ASSISTS

Kelsey Mitchell was Indiana’s leading scorer.

Her 25 points represented the highest individual scoring total in the game.

She also recorded four assists, demonstrating that her offensive contribution included more than individual shot-making.

Mitchell’s scoring helped Indiana remain competitive throughout the contest. Her production was particularly important because New York had several players scoring efficiently.

From a statistical perspective, reaching 25 points in a game where the team loses by seven illustrates how individual offensive success does not always guarantee a victory.

Basketball requires multiple forms of contribution. Shooting efficiency, rebounding, passing, defensive execution, and free-throw conversion all influence the final outcome.

Mitchell’s performance was strong, but Indiana needed additional contributions in other areas to turn that scoring into a win.

Aliyah Boston Produces 22 Points

22 POINTS | 3 REBOUNDS | 6 ASSISTS

Aliyah Boston recorded 22 points and six assists.

Her scoring made her Indiana’s second-leading contributor.

Boston also demonstrated useful playmaking ability, finishing with six assists. This was important because the Fever needed to create opportunities against a New York defense that had several capable defenders.

Her six assists showed that Indiana’s offense was not limited to perimeter shooting.

However, Boston finished with three rebounds, which was relatively modest compared with the Liberty’s frontcourt production.

New York eventually finished with 34 total rebounds, while Indiana collected 27.

Although rebounding is a collective responsibility, the difference demonstrates an area where the Fever could have benefited from additional production.

Caitlin Clark Records 21 Points and Seven Assists

21 POINTS | 4 REBOUNDS | 7 ASSISTS

Caitlin Clark delivered another productive offensive performance.

She finished with 21 points, four rebounds, and seven assists.

Her seven assists tied Breanna Stewart for the highest assist total among the players highlighted in this matchup.

Clark’s contribution was important because she combined scoring with playmaking. She helped Indiana create opportunities for Mitchell, Boston, and other offensive players.

Her 21 points also meant that Indiana had three players score at least 21 points.

This is a significant offensive achievement.

However, the result also illustrates an important basketball principle: a team can have multiple high-scoring players and still lose when other statistical categories work against it.

Indiana’s free-throw percentage and rebounding figures were two of the clearest differences in this game.

Makayla Timpson Provides Frontcourt Support

10 POINTS | 6 REBOUNDS

Makayla Timpson contributed 10 points and six rebounds.

Her performance gave Indiana another useful scoring option in the frontcourt.

Timpson also started alongside Boston, giving the Fever two players capable of contributing near the basket.

Her six rebounds were important, especially considering that Indiana needed additional possession opportunities against New York.

However, the Liberty finished with seven more total rebounds, which limited the effectiveness of Indiana’s overall frontcourt effort.

Indiana’s Bench Performance

Indiana’s reserves provided additional scoring and playmaking.

Sophie Cunningham recorded 10 points and five assists, while Tyasha Harris added six points.

Myisha Hines-Allen and Monique Billings each contributed four points.

These performances helped Indiana maintain offensive production beyond its leading scorers.

Cunningham’s five assists were especially valuable because she helped distribute the ball and create opportunities for teammates.

Nevertheless, Indiana’s bench could not completely overcome the difference in free-throw production and rebounding.

Starting Lineups for Both Teams

Starting lineups provide useful context when evaluating team strategy.

They identify the players selected to begin the contest and help explain the initial offensive and defensive structure.

Indiana Fever Starting Lineup

Player	Position
Makayla Timpson	Forward
Aliyah Boston	Center
Kelsey Mitchell	Guard
Lexie Hull	Guard
Caitlin Clark	Guard

Indiana selected a lineup featuring three perimeter-oriented players alongside two frontcourt options.

Clark and Mitchell provided primary perimeter scoring, while Boston and Timpson supplied interior presence.

Hull added another guard and wing option.

This arrangement provided Indiana with different ways to generate offense.

New York Liberty Starting Lineup

Player	Position
Breanna Stewart	Forward
Leonie Fiebich	Forward
Jonquel Jones	Center/Forward
Sabrina Ionescu	Guard
Pauline Astier	Guard

New York’s starting group featured a combination of scoring, ball movement, and frontcourt size.

Stewart and Jones provided interior scoring and rebounding. Fiebich offered another offensive option, while Ionescu and Astier supported perimeter playmaking.

The lineup also provided New York with multiple players capable of contributing in different areas.

Comparing the Starting Lineups

The most noticeable difference was the combination of frontcourt production and perimeter scoring.

Indiana had a strong offensive trio in Mitchell, Boston, and Clark.

New York responded with three important contributors in Stewart, Fiebich, and Jones.

Both teams had enough offensive talent to produce a high-scoring game.

However, New York’s ability to collect more rebounds and convert free throws became a major advantage.

Team Statistics: Liberty vs Fever

Individual performances explain how players contributed, but team statistics reveal why the final score developed as it did.

The two teams were relatively close in several offensive categories.

However, the differences in rebounds, turnovers, and free throws created a meaningful separation.

Complete Team Comparison

Statistical Category	Indiana Fever	New York Liberty
Total Points	102	109
Field Goals Made	40	37
Field Goal Attempts	70	64
Field Goal Percentage	57%	58%
Three-Pointers Made	11	11
Three-Point Attempts	26	27
Three-Point Percentage	42%	41%
Free Throws Made	11	24
Free Throw Attempts	22	29
Free Throw Percentage	50%	83%
Total Rebounds	27	34
Offensive Rebounds	3	6
Defensive Rebounds	24	28
Assists	25	24
Turnovers	8	14
Steals	7	4
Blocks	0	3
Personal Fouls	24	23

Percentages are rounded as presented in the supplied game data.

Field Goal Efficiency

Indiana converted 40 of its 70 field-goal attempts.

New York made 37 of 64 attempts.

The resulting shooting percentages were approximately 57% for Indiana and 58% for New York.

These figures demonstrate that both teams were effective when attempting shots.

Interestingly, Indiana made three more field goals than New York but still lost the game.

This is an important detail because field-goal totals do not tell the entire story of basketball scoring.

Three-point shots are worth more than two-point shots, and free throws provide another scoring opportunity.

A team can make more field goals and still lose if its opponent generates more points from other areas.

That is exactly what happened here.

Three-Point Shooting Comparison

Both teams made 11 three-point shots.

Indiana attempted 26, while New York attempted 27.

Team	Three-Pointers Made	Attempts	Percentage
Indiana Fever	11	26	42%
New York Liberty	11	27	41%

Indiana had a slight percentage advantage from beyond the arc.

However, both teams produced 33 points through three-point shooting.

Therefore, perimeter scoring did not create the difference in the final result.

This is an important distinction when analyzing the matchup.

Although three-point shooting often receives considerable attention, the numbers show that both teams produced identical scoring totals from this area.

The decisive advantage came elsewhere.

Free-Throw Shooting Made the Difference

The biggest statistical separation came from the free-throw line.

New York made 24 of 29 attempts, converting approximately 83%.

Indiana made only 11 of 22 attempts, finishing at 50%.

Team	Free Throws Made	Attempts	Percentage
Indiana Fever	11	22	50%
New York Liberty	24	29	83%

New York scored 13 more points from free throws than Indiana.

That difference was greater than the seven-point margin of victory.

To understand its importance, consider the overall scoring breakdown:

• Indiana scored 102 total points.
• New York scored 109 total points.
• Indiana made three more field goals.
• Both teams made 11 three-pointers.
• New York scored 13 more free-throw points.

The scoring difference from the free-throw line explains how New York won despite making fewer field goals.

Indiana’s 50% conversion rate meant that 11 free-throw attempts did not result in points.

In a seven-point game, those missed opportunities become especially important.

Rebounding Advantage

New York collected 34 rebounds compared with Indiana’s 27.

That created a seven-rebound advantage.

The Liberty also recorded six offensive rebounds, twice Indiana’s total of three.

Offensive rebounds are particularly valuable because they provide another opportunity to score after a missed shot.

Defensive rebounds are equally important because they prevent opponents from generating additional possessions.

New York collected 28 defensive rebounds, while Indiana recorded 24.

This difference helped the Liberty control more possessions around the basket.

Rebounding does not always translate directly into points, but it influences the number of opportunities each team receives.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Indiana recorded eight turnovers.

New York committed 14.

This means the Fever won the turnover comparison by six.

In many games, that advantage can become a major factor in determining the winner.

Fewer turnovers generally mean more opportunities to attempt shots and maintain offensive rhythm.

Indiana deserves credit for its ball security.

However, its advantage in this category was not enough to overcome the Liberty’s stronger free-throw conversion and rebounding totals.

The comparison shows why basketball analysis should consider several categories together rather than relying on a single statistic.

Assists and Team Playmaking

Indiana recorded 25 assists, while New York finished with 24.

The Fever therefore had a slight advantage in total assists.

Both teams demonstrated effective ball movement and were able to generate scoring opportunities for teammates.

Indiana’s assist total was supported by the contributions of Clark, Boston, and Cunningham.

New York received playmaking contributions from Stewart, Fiebich, Ionescu, and Johannes.

The one-assist difference was relatively small.

It did not create the same separation as the free-throw and rebounding categories.

Defensive Statistics

Indiana recorded seven steals, compared with four for New York.

The Fever also committed one additional personal foul advantage in the opposite direction, with 24 fouls compared with New York’s 23.

The Liberty recorded three blocks, while Indiana did not register a block in the supplied team statistics.

Blocks can influence shot selection, particularly when offensive players attempt to score near the basket.

However, steals and blocks should be evaluated alongside other defensive indicators.

Indiana’s seven steals demonstrate active defensive pressure, while New York’s rebounding and blocks contributed to its ability to finish possessions.

Quarter-by-Quarter Match Analysis

The scoring progression helps explain how New York established and maintained its advantage.

First Quarter: New York Takes Early Control

Indiana Fever: 26 | New York Liberty: 33

New York opened the contest with 33 points, establishing a seven-point advantage.

Indiana managed 26 points, which was a respectable offensive start, but the Liberty produced the stronger opening period.

The seven-point difference created an early challenge for Indiana.

In a competitive game, an opening-quarter deficit can influence how a team approaches the following periods.

Indiana needed to respond without allowing New York to extend its advantage.

The Liberty, meanwhile, had an opportunity to build on its opening performance.

Second Quarter: Indiana Responds

Indiana Fever: 23 | New York Liberty: 20

Indiana improved its position in the second quarter.

The Fever scored 23 points, while New York managed 20.

That three-point advantage reduced the overall gap from seven points to four.

At halftime, the scoreboard showed:

• Indiana Fever: 49 points.
• New York Liberty: 53 points.

The response demonstrated that Indiana remained competitive.

Instead of allowing the Liberty to increase its lead, the Fever gradually reduced the difference.

However, New York still entered the second half with a four-point advantage.

Third Quarter: Liberty Restores Its Advantage

Indiana Fever: 29 | New York Liberty: 32

The third quarter became another important period for New York.

Indiana produced 29 points, but the Liberty scored 32.

The three-point difference increased New York’s lead from four to seven.

After three quarters, the score stood at:

Team	Points
Indiana Fever	78
New York Liberty	85

Indiana had remained within reach, but the Liberty maintained its offensive advantage.

This period was important because New York prevented the Fever from completing their comeback.

Fourth Quarter: Both Teams Score 24 Points

Indiana Fever: 24 | New York Liberty: 24

The final quarter produced identical scoring totals.

Both teams scored 24 points.

Indiana needed to outscore New York to reduce the deficit, but the equal scoring output meant that the seven-point difference remained unchanged.

The Liberty therefore secured the 109-102 victory.

The fourth-quarter numbers show that neither team gained a scoring advantage during the final period.

New York’s earlier work proved sufficient to protect its lead.

Why Did the New York Liberty Win?

The Liberty’s victory came from a combination of offensive efficiency, rebounding, and free-throw production.

Indiana performed well in several important areas, but New York gained the more valuable advantages.

1. Superior Free-Throw Conversion

New York converted 83% of its free throws.

Indiana converted only 50%.

The Liberty made 13 more free throws, creating a significant scoring advantage.

Because the final margin was seven points, this difference deserves considerable attention.

2. Stronger Rebounding

New York collected seven more rebounds.

The Liberty also doubled Indiana’s offensive rebounds.

Additional possessions can create scoring opportunities and prevent opponents from controlling the game.

3. Balanced Scoring

Three Liberty players scored at least 19 points.

Stewart recorded 22, Fiebich added 20, and Jones contributed 19.

This made New York’s offense less dependent on one individual.

Indiana also had three major scorers, but the Liberty’s supporting production helped maintain its advantage.

4. Consistent Scoring Across the Game

New York scored 33 points in the first quarter and 32 in the third.

These two periods created the foundation for the victory.

The team also avoided a scoring collapse in the fourth quarter, matching Indiana’s 24 points.

5. Effective Frontcourt Production

Jones recorded 10 rebounds, while Stewart contributed eight.

The team finished with 34 rebounds overall.

That advantage helped New York manage possessions and limit Indiana’s opportunities for additional scoring chances.

Why Did Indiana Fever Lose Despite Strong Shooting?

Indiana’s defeat was not caused by a complete offensive failure.

The team actually recorded more successful field goals and more assists than New York.

Its three-point shooting percentage was also slightly higher.

However, several other areas prevented the Fever from converting those advantages into a victory.

Poor Free-Throw Conversion

The most obvious problem was the 50% free-throw percentage.

Indiana left 11 potential points unconverted at the free-throw line.

Against a team that won by seven, that represents a major missed opportunity.

Rebounding Disadvantage

The Fever finished with 27 rebounds, seven fewer than New York.

The difference was also visible in offensive rebounding.

Indiana collected just three offensive rebounds, compared with six for the Liberty.

This reduced its opportunities to recover missed shots.

Defensive Challenges

New York had several players producing high scoring totals.

Stewart, Fiebich, and Jones all reached at least 19 points.

Indiana’s defensive effort produced seven steals, but it did not prevent the Liberty from shooting approximately 58% from the field.

The Importance of Converting Opportunities

Indiana’s eight turnovers were better than New York’s 14.

That statistic demonstrates that the Fever generally protected possession more effectively.

However, fewer turnovers do not automatically guarantee a victory.

A team must also convert scoring opportunities, compete for rebounds, and defend efficiently.

Indiana performed well in some areas but struggled to match New York in the categories that ultimately influenced the final score.

Season Series: New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever

The August matchup was the fourth meeting between these teams during the 2026 regular season.

Before the game, the season series was tied at 2-1 in Indiana’s favor.

The Liberty’s victory brought the overall series level at two wins apiece.

Results of All Four Meetings

Game	Date	Result	Winner
Game 1	June 7, 2026	Liberty 83-75 Fever	New York
Game 2	July 19, 2026	Fever 108-88 Liberty	Indiana
Game 3	August 12, 2026	Fever 106-92 Liberty	Indiana
Game 4	August 23, 2026	Liberty 109-102 Fever	New York

First Meeting: June 7

New York won the opening meeting 83-75.

The eight-point victory gave the Liberty an early advantage in the season series.

Second Meeting: July 19

Indiana responded with a convincing 108-88 victory.

The Fever won by 20 points, demonstrating their ability to produce a strong offensive performance against New York.

Third Meeting: August 12

Indiana won again, recording a 106-92 result.

This 14-point victory gave the Fever a 2-1 advantage in the series.

Fourth Meeting: August 23

New York responded with a 109-102 victory.

The result prevented Indiana from finishing the regular-season series with a winning record against the Liberty.

Both teams finished with two victories.

What the 2-2 Series Result Shows

The final series result highlights the competitive nature of the matchup.

Neither team managed to dominate all four meetings.

Indiana produced two convincing victories in July and August, while New York responded by winning the first and fourth games.

The changing results also demonstrate how individual matchups, shooting efficiency, and team execution can influence different games between the same opponents.

A tied season series does not mean that the teams performed identically in every category. Instead, it shows that both sides managed to secure important victories during their four meetings.

What the Match Statistics Reveal About Both Teams

Beyond the final score, this game provides several useful insights into team performance.

New York’s Offensive Balance

The Liberty demonstrated that successful offense does not always depend on one player scoring 30 or more points.

Stewart, Fiebich, and Jones combined for 61 points.

Ionescu and the supporting players contributed additional production.

This distribution gave New York multiple scoring options.

Indiana’s Perimeter Production

The Fever’s three leading scorers combined for 68 points.

Mitchell, Boston, and Clark were responsible for much of the team’s offensive output.

Their performances demonstrated the strength of Indiana’s primary scoring options.

However, the team needed more production from other areas to match New York’s overall performance.

The Value of Frontcourt Contributions

Rebounding was one of the most important differences.

Jones recorded a double-double, while Stewart contributed eight rebounds.

Indiana’s leading rebounder was Makayla Timpson with six.

The overall difference of seven rebounds favored New York.

This demonstrates how frontcourt production can influence games even when perimeter shooting is relatively balanced.

Shooting Percentages Can Be Misleading

Indiana shot approximately 57% from the field, while New York shot approximately 58%.

These percentages were nearly identical.

Indiana also had a slight advantage in three-point shooting percentage.

Yet New York won by seven.

The explanation is that overall scoring depends on more than field-goal percentage.

Free throws, shot value, rebounding, and possession management all contribute to the final result.

Turnover Advantages Must Be Used Effectively

Indiana committed six fewer turnovers.

This was a positive part of its performance.

However, the Fever did not turn that advantage into enough additional points to overcome the free-throw difference.

A team can win one statistical category and still lose when its opponent performs better in several other important areas.

Important Basketball Statistics Explained

Readers who follow individual player performances often encounter several statistical terms in WNBA box scores.

Understanding these measurements makes it easier to interpret the numbers correctly.

Points

Points represent the total number of points a player scores through field goals and free throws.

A two-point field goal adds two points, a three-point field goal adds three, and a successful free throw adds one.

Rebounds

Rebounds are recorded when a player gains possession after a missed field-goal or free-throw attempt.

There are two main types:

• Offensive rebounds: Recovered by the attacking team.
• Defensive rebounds: Recovered by the defending team.

Both categories influence possession opportunities.

Assists

An assist is credited when a player’s pass directly contributes to a teammate’s successful field goal.

Players with high assist totals often contribute significantly to team playmaking.

Turnovers

A turnover occurs when a team loses possession without completing a successful shot attempt that produces a normal scoring result.

Turnovers can result from poor passes, offensive violations, or losing control of the ball.

Steals

A steal occurs when a defensive player legally takes possession of the ball from an opponent.

Steals can stop an attacking possession and create an opportunity for a fast break.

Blocks

A block occurs when a defensive player legally deflects an opponent’s field-goal attempt.

Blocks can discourage opponents from attacking the basket and influence offensive decisions.

Plus/Minus

Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court.

For example, a player with a plus/minus of +7 was on the court during a period when their team outscored the opponent by seven points.

It is important to understand that plus/minus does not measure individual scoring alone.

A player can have a strong individual performance but a negative plus/minus if the opponent outscores their team during that player’s minutes.

Where to Find the Official Box Score

Readers looking for the original game record can consult the official WNBA game summary.

The official game page provides the final score, quarter-by-quarter results, and game information.

The ESPN box score associated with game ID 401857164 is also identified in the supplied match data.

When comparing player statistics, it is important to distinguish between individual figures and team totals. Team rebounds, turnovers, and shooting numbers should not be confused with the statistics of a single player.

For historical comparisons, using the same statistical source and checking the game date helps prevent errors.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever game on August 23, 2026?

The New York Liberty defeated the Indiana Fever 109-102. The game was played at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York. The victory brought the teams’ 2026 regular-season series to a 2-2 tie.

2. Who was the leading scorer in the game?

Kelsey Mitchell was the leading scorer with 25 points for Indiana. Breanna Stewart led New York with 22 points. Mitchell recorded the highest individual scoring total of the contest.

3. How many points did Caitlin Clark score against the New York Liberty?

Caitlin Clark scored 21 points. She also recorded four rebounds and seven assists, making her one of Indiana’s most productive players in the matchup.

4. How many points and rebounds did Breanna Stewart record?

Breanna Stewart finished with 22 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists. She led New York in scoring and assists, providing an important contribution across multiple statistical categories.

5. How did Jonquel Jones perform against Indiana?

Jonquel Jones recorded 19 points and 10 rebounds. Her performance produced a double-double and helped New York finish with a 34-27 advantage in total rebounds.

6. Why did the New York Liberty win despite making fewer field goals?

New York made 37 field goals compared with Indiana’s 40, but the Liberty converted 24 of 29 free throws. Indiana made only 11 of 22 attempts. New York also collected seven more rebounds, helping secure the 109-102 victory.

Conclusion

The New York Liberty’s 109-102 victory over the Indiana Fever was a strong example of how several statistical categories combine to determine a basketball result.

Indiana produced an impressive offensive performance, making 40 field goals and recording 25 assists. Kelsey Mitchell led the Fever with 25 points, while Aliyah Boston added 22 and Caitlin Clark contributed 21.

However, New York demonstrated greater effectiveness in several important areas. Breanna Stewart led the Liberty with 22 points and seven assists. Leonie Fiebich added 20 points, and Jonquel Jones recorded a double-double with 19 points and 10 rebounds.

The biggest difference came from the free-throw line. New York converted 83% of its attempts, compared with Indiana’s 50%. The Liberty also collected seven more rebounds and matched Indiana’s three-point production.

Although the Fever committed fewer turnovers and recorded more assists and steals, those advantages were not enough to overcome New York’s scoring efficiency.

The victory brought the four-game season series to a 2-2 tie, reflecting the competitive balance between the two teams during the 2026 regular season.

Ultimately, the numbers show that the Liberty won through balanced scoring, stronger rebounding, and better free-throw conversion, while Indiana’s impressive individual scoring performances were not enough to produce a victory.