Green bay packers vs dallas cowboys match player stats
The green bay packers vs dallas cowboys match player stats from September 28, 2025, tell the story of one of the most entertaining offensive battles of the NFL season. The Green Bay Packers and Dallas Cowboys finished in a remarkable 40-40 tie after overtime, with both teams producing explosive passing performances, effective rushing attacks, and several important scoring plays. Jordan Love and Dak Prescott each threw for three touchdowns without an interception, while Josh Jacobs and George Pickens delivered outstanding individual performances. The game featured multiple momentum changes, a productive fourth quarter, and a dramatic overtime period in which neither team could find the winning score.
This contest was more than a high-scoring matchup between two historic NFL franchises. It offered an excellent example of how quarterback efficiency, red-zone execution, explosive receiving plays, and defensive adjustments can shape the outcome of a game. Green Bay built its offense around balanced production from Love, Jacobs, and Romeo Doubs. Dallas answered with Prescott’s accurate passing, George Pickens’ explosive receiving ability, and an effective ground game led by Javonte Williams.
Although both teams scored 40 points, neither managed to secure a victory. The final result left Green Bay with a 2-1-1 record and Dallas with a 1-2-1 record. This detailed breakdown examines the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, and special teams statistics to explain how the game developed and which players had the greatest influence.
Green Bay Packers vs Dallas Cowboys Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The September 28, 2025, meeting between Green Bay and Dallas became an offensive shootout that continued until the end of overtime. Both teams scored 40 points, combining for 80 total points in a contest where offensive production repeatedly overcame defensive resistance.
The Packers entered the matchup looking to establish themselves through a balanced offensive approach. The Cowboys wanted to use Prescott’s passing ability and their running game to challenge Green Bay’s defense.
Both approaches produced impressive results.
Green Bay finished with 337 passing yards according to Jordan Love’s individual passing line and 164 rushing yards. Dallas recorded 319 passing yards from Prescott and 117 rushing yards. The Packers had the advantage on the ground, while Dallas generated more explosive receiving production through Pickens.
Match Information
| Category | Details |
| Matchup | Green Bay Packers vs Dallas Cowboys |
| Sport | National Football League |
| Game Date | September 28, 2025 |
| NFL Week | Week 4 |
| Game ID | 401772921 |
| Stadium Side | Dallas home game |
| Final Score | Packers 40, Cowboys 40 |
| Game Status | Final, Overtime |
| Packers Record | 2-1-1 |
| Cowboys Record | 1-2-1 |
| Packers Away Record | 0-1-1 |
| Cowboys Home Record | 1-0-1 |
The most important detail is the final score. A 40-40 tie is unusual because both teams must sustain their offensive production while also preventing the opponent from creating a decisive advantage.
Neither defense managed to consistently control the opposing offense. Both quarterbacks threw three touchdown passes, both teams scored multiple rushing touchdowns, and both offenses finished with 31 completed passes.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring
| Quarter | Green Bay Packers | Dallas Cowboys |
| First Quarter | 7 | 0 |
| Second Quarter | 6 | 16 |
| Third Quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Fourth Quarter | 17 | 14 |
| Overtime | 3 | 3 |
| Final Score | 40 | 40 |
Green Bay started faster, scoring seven points in the opening quarter while keeping Dallas off the scoreboard.
Dallas responded strongly in the second quarter. The Cowboys scored 16 points, turning an early deficit into a halftime advantage.
The third quarter was more balanced, with each team scoring seven points. However, the fourth quarter produced the biggest scoring surge from Green Bay.
The Packers scored 17 points in the final regulation quarter, while Dallas added 14. That offensive response allowed Green Bay to remain competitive and send the game into overtime.
Both teams then scored three points in overtime, leaving the contest tied.
Jordan Love vs Dak Prescott: Quarterback Statistics
The quarterback comparison was one of the most interesting parts of this matchup.
Jordan Love and Dak Prescott both demonstrated excellent passing production. Each quarterback completed 31 passes, threw three touchdowns, and avoided interceptions.
Their individual numbers were close enough to make this a particularly useful comparison of accuracy, passing efficiency, and offensive responsibility.
Jordan Love’s Passing Performance
Jordan Love delivered an impressive performance for Green Bay.
| Statistic | Jordan Love |
| Completions | 31 |
| Attempts | 43 |
| Completion Percentage | 72.1% |
| Passing Yards | 337 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 7.8 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 12 |
| QBR | 62.7 |
| Passer Rating | 118.1 |
Love completed 31 of his 43 passing attempts, producing a completion percentage of approximately 72.1%.
His 337 passing yards demonstrated that Green Bay could move the ball through the air consistently. More importantly, he threw three touchdown passes without giving Dallas an interception.
Avoiding interceptions was particularly important in a game where both offenses were scoring frequently. A turnover could have created a major opportunity for the opposing team to take control.
Love’s passer rating of 118.1 reflected his productive performance.
He also contributed as a runner, recording three carries for 28 yards. His longest run covered 25 yards.
That rushing contribution added another dimension to Green Bay’s offense. Dallas could not focus exclusively on the Packers’ running backs because Love also had the ability to create yards with his legs.
His performance demonstrated three important strengths:
- Strong completion percentage.
- Consistent downfield passing production.
- The ability to contribute as both a passer and runner.
One statistical detail deserves attention. The supplied ESPN data lists Love with 337 passing yards, but the Packers’ team passing line lists 325 yards. The receiving totals also add up to 337 yards. The individual player figure is preserved here, but the discrepancy should be checked against the official box score before using the numbers in a statistical database.
Dak Prescott’s Passing Performance
Dak Prescott produced an equally impressive performance for Dallas.
| Statistic | Dak Prescott |
| Completions | 31 |
| Attempts | 40 |
| Completion Percentage | 77.5% |
| Passing Yards | 319 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 0 |
| QBR | 93.7 |
| Passer Rating | 124.9 |
Prescott completed 31 of his 40 passing attempts, giving him a completion percentage of 77.5%.
His accuracy was slightly better than Love’s, and his 8.0 yards per attempt showed that Dallas was able to generate productive gains through the passing game.
Prescott finished with 319 passing yards and three touchdown passes. Like Love, he did not throw an interception.
His passer rating of 124.9 was higher than Love’s 118.1.
This distinction is important because total passing yards do not tell the entire story of quarterback performance. Completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdowns, interceptions, and sacks all contribute to a broader evaluation.
Prescott also recorded one rushing attempt for two yards and a rushing touchdown.
That score gave Dallas another way to finish drives without depending entirely on its receiving options.
Jordan Love vs Dak Prescott Comparison
| Passing Category | Jordan Love | Dak Prescott |
| Completions | 31 | 31 |
| Attempts | 43 | 40 |
| Completion Percentage | 72.1% | 77.5% |
| Passing Yards | 337 | 319 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 7.8 | 8.0 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 | 1 |
| QBR | 62.7 | 93.7 |
| Passer Rating | 118.1 | 124.9 |
The comparison reveals several interesting differences.
Love produced 18 more passing yards, while Prescott completed the same number of passes using three fewer attempts.
Prescott also recorded a higher completion percentage and passer rating.
However, both quarterbacks finished with identical touchdown and interception totals.
The overall conclusion is that neither quarterback clearly dominated the other in every category. Love produced more total passing yards, while Prescott was more efficient according to completion percentage, yards per attempt, and passer rating.
Green Bay Packers Rushing Statistics
Green Bay’s rushing attack was another major reason the Packers remained competitive.
The team recorded 35 rushing attempts for 164 yards, averaging 4.7 yards per carry. The Packers also produced two rushing touchdowns.
Josh Jacobs led the backfield, while Emanuel Wilson provided additional production.
Jordan Love contributed with several useful runs, including a 25-yard gain.
Josh Jacobs Leads the Packers
Josh Jacobs was Green Bay’s leading running back in the matchup.
| Statistic | Josh Jacobs |
| Carries | 22 |
| Rushing Yards | 86 |
| Average | 3.9 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 2 |
| Longest Run | 19 yards |
| Receptions | 4 |
| Receiving Yards | 71 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 0 |
Jacobs finished with 86 rushing yards on 22 carries and scored twice.
His rushing average was 3.9 yards per attempt. Although that figure was not particularly explosive, his touchdown production made him one of Green Bay’s most important offensive players.
Jacobs also contributed significantly as a receiver.
He caught four passes for 71 yards, averaging 17.8 yards per reception. His longest reception covered 28 yards.
Combining his rushing and receiving production gives him 157 yards from scrimmage.
That total illustrates why Jacobs was such an important part of the Packers’ offensive approach. He was not limited to short-yardage situations or traditional running plays. Green Bay also used him as a receiving option to create mismatches and generate additional yardage.
His two rushing touchdowns provided valuable scoring production.
Emanuel Wilson’s Contribution
Emanuel Wilson added another productive performance from the backfield.
| Statistic | Emanuel Wilson |
| Carries | 8 |
| Rushing Yards | 44 |
| Average | 5.5 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 13 yards |
| Receptions | 3 |
| Receiving Yards | 37 |
Wilson averaged 5.5 yards per carry, which was higher than Jacobs’ 3.9 average.
His eight rushing attempts produced 44 yards. He also caught three passes for 37 yards.
Wilson therefore recorded 81 total yards from scrimmage.
His contribution helped Green Bay maintain a balanced offensive structure. When a defense must account for multiple running backs, it becomes more difficult to concentrate its attention on one player.
Additional Packers Rushing Production
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Josh Jacobs | 22 | 86 | 3.9 | 2 | 19 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 8 | 44 | 5.5 | 0 | 13 |
| Jordan Love | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 0 | 25 |
| Matthew Golden | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| Savion Williams | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team Total | 35 | 164 | 4.7 | 2 | 25 |
Green Bay’s ability to distribute rushing attempts helped keep the offense unpredictable.
Love’s 28 rushing yards were particularly valuable because they gave the Packers another source of mobility outside the running back position.
The Packers did not depend exclusively on one rushing option. Instead, they used Jacobs as the primary runner, Wilson as a complementary option, and Love as a mobile quarterback.
Dallas Cowboys Rushing Statistics
Dallas also established a productive rushing attack, although its overall production was lower than Green Bay’s.
The Cowboys finished with 26 rushing attempts for 117 yards, averaging 4.5 yards per carry.
Javonte Williams led the backfield with 85 rushing yards and one touchdown.
Javonte Williams Leads Dallas
| Statistic | Javonte Williams |
| Carries | 20 |
| Rushing Yards | 85 |
| Average | 4.3 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest Run | 13 yards |
| Receptions | 3 |
| Receiving Yards | 15 |
Williams carried the ball 20 times and finished with 85 yards.
His average of 4.3 yards per carry provided Dallas with a dependable rushing option.
He also recorded three receptions for 15 yards.
His combined total of 100 yards from scrimmage showed that he contributed in both phases of the offense.
Williams’ one rushing touchdown helped Dallas maintain pressure on the Packers’ defense.
Additional Cowboys Rushing Production
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Javonte Williams | 20 | 85 | 4.3 | 1 | 13 |
| Ryan Flournoy | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
| Miles Sanders | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 5 |
| Hunter Luepke | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dak Prescott | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Team Total | 26 | 117 | 4.5 | 2 | 13 |
Ryan Flournoy averaged 12 yards on his single rushing attempt.
Although this was a small sample, his contribution demonstrated that Dallas had additional players capable of producing positive yardage when given opportunities.
Prescott’s rushing touchdown was also significant. It gave Dallas a scoring option that did not require a passing completion.
Packers vs Cowboys Rushing Comparison
| Category | Packers | Cowboys |
| Rushing Attempts | 35 | 26 |
| Rushing Yards | 164 | 117 |
| Yards Per Carry | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Longest Run | 25 | 13 |
Green Bay held a clear advantage in total rushing yardage.
The Packers gained 47 more rushing yards and recorded nine additional attempts.
However, both teams scored two rushing touchdowns.
This comparison shows that Green Bay had greater overall rushing volume, while Dallas remained competitive in terms of rushing efficiency and scoring production.
Green Bay Packers Receiving Statistics
Green Bay’s receiving production was distributed across several players.
Although Romeo Doubs led the team in receiving touchdowns, Jacobs produced the highest receiving yardage among Packers players.
Matthew Golden and Tucker Kraft also made useful contributions.
Romeo Doubs’ Three-Touchdown Performance
Romeo Doubs was one of the most important receiving players in the game.
| Statistic | Romeo Doubs |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Targets | 8 |
| Receiving Yards | 58 |
| Average | 9.7 |
| Touchdowns | 3 |
| Longest Reception | 18 yards |
Doubs caught six of his eight targets for 58 yards.
His most important contribution was his three touchdown receptions.
Touchdowns are often more valuable than raw receiving yardage because they directly convert offensive possessions into points.
Doubs’ ability to finish scoring opportunities made him one of Love’s most effective targets.
He did not need to produce the highest yardage total to become a major factor in the final score.
His three touchdowns represented all of Green Bay’s passing touchdowns.
Josh Jacobs as a Receiving Threat
Jacobs also produced one of the best receiving performances among Green Bay players.
He caught four passes for 71 yards.
His 17.8 yards per reception were particularly impressive for a running back.
This production gave Love another option when Dallas attempted to defend the outside receivers or pressure the quarterback.
Jacobs’ receiving numbers also increased his overall offensive contribution to 157 yards from scrimmage.
Matthew Golden’s Contribution
Matthew Golden caught five passes for 58 yards.
| Statistic | Matthew Golden |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Targets | 6 |
| Receiving Yards | 58 |
| Average | 11.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Reception | 46 yards |
Golden’s longest reception covered 46 yards, making him an important explosive-play option.
His five catches helped Green Bay stretch the defense and create additional opportunities for other offensive players.
Even without a touchdown, his contribution was meaningful.
A long reception can change field position, create favorable scoring situations, and force defensive adjustments.
Tucker Kraft and Emanuel Wilson
Tucker Kraft recorded five receptions for 56 yards on five targets.
His 100% catch rate in the supplied statistics showed that he converted every listed target into a reception.
Kraft averaged 11.2 yards per catch.
Emanuel Wilson added three receptions for 37 yards, averaging 12.3 yards per reception.
Together, their contributions helped Green Bay distribute the passing workload across multiple positions.
Complete Packers Receiving Table
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Josh Jacobs | 4 | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 0 | 28 |
| Romeo Doubs | 6 | 8 | 58 | 9.7 | 3 | 18 |
| Matthew Golden | 5 | 6 | 58 | 11.6 | 0 | 46 |
| Tucker Kraft | 5 | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 0 | 16 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 3 | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 0 | 25 |
| Savion Williams | 3 | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 0 | 16 |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 2 | 4 | 19 | 9.5 | 0 | 15 |
| Malik Heath | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| Luke Musgrave | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| Chris Brooks | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team Total | 31 | 36 | 337 | 10.9 | 3 | 46 |
The receiving distribution highlights the depth of Green Bay’s passing attack.
Doubs supplied the touchdown production, Jacobs provided significant yardage from the backfield, and Golden offered the longest reception.
Kraft and Wilson also provided reliable intermediate options.
This balance made it difficult for Dallas to focus its coverage on one receiver.
Dallas Cowboys Receiving Statistics
Dallas produced an equally interesting receiving performance.
George Pickens was the leading receiver, recording 134 yards and two touchdowns.
Jake Ferguson also contributed a touchdown, while Jalen Tolbert generated useful yardage.
George Pickens Delivers an Explosive Performance
George Pickens was Dallas’ leading receiving player.
| Statistic | George Pickens |
| Receptions | 8 |
| Targets | 11 |
| Receiving Yards | 134 |
| Average | 16.8 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Longest Reception | 28 yards |
Pickens caught eight of his 11 targets for 134 yards.
His average of 16.8 yards per reception demonstrated his ability to generate substantial gains.
He also scored twice, making him one of the most influential offensive players in the matchup.
Pickens’ production was especially important because Dallas needed consistent explosive plays to keep pace with Green Bay.
His 134 receiving yards represented a substantial portion of Prescott’s passing production.
He was the clear leader in Dallas’ receiving department.
Jalen Tolbert Adds Valuable Yardage
Jalen Tolbert finished with four receptions for 61 yards.
He averaged 15.3 yards per reception, with a longest catch of 34 yards.
Although he did not score a touchdown, Tolbert provided another downfield option for Prescott.
His contribution helped prevent Green Bay from concentrating its defensive coverage entirely on Pickens.
Jake Ferguson’s Touchdown Contribution
Jake Ferguson recorded seven receptions for 40 yards and one touchdown.
His seven catches ranked second on the Cowboys in receptions.
Ferguson averaged 5.7 yards per reception.
His role was different from Pickens’ explosive receiving approach. Ferguson supplied a shorter passing option that could help Dallas maintain possession and move the chains.
His touchdown also demonstrated his importance in scoring situations.
Additional Dallas Receiving Contributors
KaVontae Turpin caught three passes for 30 yards.
Miles Sanders recorded two receptions for 17 yards, while Javonte Williams added three catches for 15 yards.
Ryan Flournoy caught two passes for 14 yards.
Luke Schoonmaker contributed two receptions for eight yards.
These additional options helped Prescott distribute the football across different positions.
Complete Cowboys Receiving Table
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| George Pickens | 8 | 11 | 134 | 16.8 | 2 | 28 |
| Jalen Tolbert | 4 | 6 | 61 | 15.3 | 0 | 34 |
| Jake Ferguson | 7 | 7 | 40 | 5.7 | 1 | 11 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 3 | 4 | 30 | 10.0 | 0 | 15 |
| Miles Sanders | 2 | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 9 |
| Javonte Williams | 3 | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 0 | 9 |
| Ryan Flournoy | 2 | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 11 |
| Luke Schoonmaker | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 5 |
| Hunter Luepke | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 31 | 38 | 319 | 10.3 | 3 | 34 |
Dallas finished with 31 receptions for 319 receiving yards.
Pickens was the biggest difference-maker in the receiving department.
His two touchdowns and 134 yards gave Dallas a major offensive weapon, while Tolbert and Ferguson provided additional production.
Defensive Statistics: Packers vs Cowboys
Although the offensive performances dominated attention, the defensive numbers help explain why neither team managed to win.
Both defenses recorded one sack.
Green Bay produced more passes defended, while Dallas finished with more total tackles and tackles for loss.
Neither team recorded an interception.
Green Bay Packers Defensive Performance
| Defensive Category | Packers |
| Total Tackles | 75 |
| Solo Tackles | 40 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 |
| Passes Defended | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 |
Green Bay recorded 75 total tackles and 40 solo tackles.
The defense also registered four passes defended and four quarterback hits.
However, its inability to consistently disrupt Prescott’s passing game allowed Dallas to produce 319 passing yards and three touchdown passes.
The Packers recorded only one sack.
That limited pressure was an important factor in the Cowboys’ offensive success.
Notable defensive players listed in the supplied statistics include:
- Quay Walker
- Evan Williams
- Edgerrin Cooper
- Xavier McKinney
- Nate Hobbs
- Keisean Nixon
- Rashan Gary
- Micah Parsons
These players represented important parts of Green Bay’s defensive group.
Dallas Cowboys Defensive Performance
| Defensive Category | Cowboys |
| Total Tackles | 83 |
| Solo Tackles | 52 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
| Quarterback Hits | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 |
Dallas recorded 83 total tackles, including 52 solo tackles.
The Cowboys also produced five tackles for loss.
Their four quarterback hits matched Green Bay’s total, while both teams recorded one sack.
Dallas had only one pass defended and did not record an interception.
The lack of takeaways was particularly important. Love finished without an interception, and the Cowboys did not create a turnover through the passing game.
Notable Dallas defensive players included:
- Jack Sanborn
- Kenneth Murray Jr.
- Reddy Steward
- Donovan Wilson
- Osa Odighizuwa
- DaRon Bland
- Trevon Diggs
- Jadeveon Clowney
Defensive Comparison
| Statistic | Packers | Cowboys |
| Total Tackles | 75 | 83 |
| Solo Tackles | 40 | 52 |
| Sacks | 1 | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 4 | 1 |
| QB Hits | 4 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
Dallas recorded more tackles and tackles for loss.
Green Bay finished with more passes defended.
However, the most important shared statistic was the absence of interceptions.
Neither defense managed to produce a turnover through an interception, and both quarterbacks were able to maintain possession throughout their passing performances.
The single sack recorded by each team also indicates that neither defense consistently controlled the pocket.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams played an important supporting role in this high-scoring contest.
Both teams received contributions from their kickers, punters, and return units.
Dallas had the advantage in kick-return yardage, while Green Bay recorded two successful field goals.
Green Bay Packers Kicking
| Statistic | Brandon McManus |
| Field Goals Made | 2 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 2 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% |
| Longest Field Goal | 53 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 4 |
| Extra Points Attempted | 5 |
| Total Points | 10 |
Brandon McManus converted both field-goal attempts.
His longest successful kick covered 53 yards.
He also converted four of five extra-point attempts.
His 10 total points made him an important contributor to Green Bay’s offensive total.
Dallas Cowboys Kicking
| Statistic | Brandon Aubrey |
| Field Goals Made | 1 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 1 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% |
| Longest Field Goal | 22 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 5 |
| Extra Points Attempted | 5 |
| Total Points | 8 |
Brandon Aubrey converted his only field-goal attempt and made all five extra points.
He finished with eight points.
The difference between the kickers’ totals was partly influenced by the number of field-goal opportunities and extra-point attempts recorded in the supplied statistics.
Kick Return Statistics
| Team | Returner | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Packers | Bo Melton | 2 | 60 | 30.0 | 30 |
| Packers | Savion Williams | 1 | 24 | 24.0 | 24 |
| Cowboys | KaVontae Turpin | 6 | 175 | 29.2 | 45 |
Green Bay recorded 84 total kick-return yards on three attempts.
Dallas generated 175 yards on six returns.
KaVontae Turpin was particularly productive, averaging 29.2 yards per return.
His longest return covered 45 yards.
That production helped Dallas create favorable starting field positions.
Punt Return Statistics
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Matthew Golden | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 9 |
| Romeo Doubs | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 |
| Packers Total | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 9 |
Dallas recorded no punt returns in the supplied statistics.
Punting Comparison
| Statistic | Daniel Whelan | Bryan Anger |
| Team | Packers | Cowboys |
| Punts | 2 | 4 |
| Total Yards | 83 | 190 |
| Average | 41.5 | 47.5 |
| Touchbacks | 0 | 0 |
| Inside the 20 | 2 | 1 |
| Longest Punt | 43 | 51 |
Bryan Anger averaged 47.5 yards per punt, compared with Daniel Whelan’s 41.5.
However, Whelan placed both of his punts inside the 20-yard line.
Anger recorded one punt inside the 20.
These numbers illustrate the difference between distance and placement. A longer punt can improve field position, but directional accuracy and landing position also matter.
How the Game Developed: A Quarter-by-Quarter Analysis
The final score provides a useful summary, but the scoring progression reveals how the matchup changed over time.
First Quarter: Green Bay Takes the Early Advantage
Green Bay opened the game with seven points.
Dallas failed to score during the first quarter.
The Packers’ early advantage provided a positive start and demonstrated their ability to establish offensive momentum.
The Cowboys, however, were not out of the game.
Their response in the following quarter changed the direction of the contest.
Second Quarter: Dallas Produces a Major Response
Dallas scored 16 points in the second quarter.
Green Bay managed six.
This was the Cowboys’ strongest scoring period of regulation.
The 16-point performance allowed Dallas to move ahead after starting the game without a first-quarter score.
The second quarter also highlighted the importance of offensive balance.
Dallas used Prescott’s passing production and its scoring options to put pressure on the Packers.
Third Quarter: Both Teams Maintain Their Production
The third quarter finished with both teams scoring seven points.
Neither offense completely controlled the period.
Green Bay remained within reach, while Dallas continued to protect its advantage.
The balanced scoring indicated that the game was becoming a sustained offensive contest rather than a matchup controlled by one side.
Fourth Quarter: Green Bay’s 17-Point Surge
The fourth quarter was one of the most important stages of the matchup.
Green Bay scored 17 points, while Dallas added 14.
The Packers’ scoring surge allowed them to overcome the earlier deficit and force overtime.
This period demonstrated why late-game performance is important when evaluating NFL statistics.
A team can have a difficult second quarter but still remain competitive if it produces points during the closing stages.
Green Bay’s offense delivered when the game was approaching its conclusion.
Overtime: Neither Team Finds the Winning Score
Overtime produced three points for each team.
Both sides managed to add to their totals, but neither secured the decisive score.
The result was a 40-40 tie.
For Green Bay, the outcome represented an opportunity to remain unbeaten in the matchup’s final result despite not securing a win.
For Dallas, it meant that a productive home performance ended without the victory the team wanted.
Why the Packers Finished With More Rushing Yards
One of the clearest statistical differences was Green Bay’s advantage on the ground.
The Packers recorded 164 rushing yards, while Dallas finished with 117.
That created a 47-yard advantage for Green Bay.
There were several reasons this difference matters.
First, rushing production can help an offense maintain balance. When a team can run the football effectively, the defense must account for both rushing and passing possibilities.
Second, running backs can help control possession and create manageable situations for the quarterback.
Third, quarterback mobility can create additional problems for a defense.
Love’s 28 rushing yards added another dimension to Green Bay’s ground game.
However, the Cowboys were not ineffective as runners. Williams recorded 85 yards, and the team averaged 4.5 yards per carry.
The difference was primarily the number of rushing attempts and the additional production from Green Bay’s secondary rushing options.
Why George Pickens Was Dallas’ Most Important Receiver
George Pickens recorded 134 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
His performance was the biggest individual receiving contribution for Dallas.
Pickens averaged 16.8 yards per catch, which was significantly higher than the Cowboys’ overall receiving average of 10.3.
This difference shows his importance as an explosive-play option.
When a receiver consistently generates large gains, defensive coordinators must adjust their coverage plans.
That can create opportunities for other players.
Jalen Tolbert benefited from the broader receiving distribution, recording 61 yards.
Jake Ferguson also provided a reliable target, catching seven passes and scoring once.
Pickens’ performance was not simply about collecting yards. His two touchdowns made him a direct contributor to Dallas’ scoring output.
Why Romeo Doubs’ Three Touchdowns Mattered
Romeo Doubs recorded 58 receiving yards and three touchdowns.
Although his yardage total was lower than Pickens’, his scoring production was extremely valuable.
A receiver’s impact cannot always be measured by total yardage.
Touchdown receptions represent successful completion of offensive drives, and Doubs converted three of his opportunities into scores.
His performance also showed the importance of having multiple offensive weapons.
Dallas had to account for Jacobs, Golden, Kraft, Wilson, and other receiving options.
Doubs’ ability to finish drives gave Green Bay another reliable scoring threat.
Five Major Statistical Takeaways
The matchup produced several important lessons for anyone analyzing NFL box scores.
1. Both Quarterbacks Were Highly Productive
Love and Prescott each completed 31 passes.
Both threw three touchdowns and avoided interceptions.
Their similar production explains why neither offense struggled to generate points.
2. Green Bay Had the Stronger Ground Game
The Packers recorded 164 rushing yards.
Dallas produced 117.
Green Bay’s 47-yard advantage gave its offense another source of production beyond passing.
3. George Pickens Led All Receivers in Yardage
Pickens recorded 134 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
His performance was one of the biggest individual highlights of the game.
4. Romeo Doubs Led Green Bay in Receiving Touchdowns
Doubs caught three touchdown passes.
His scoring production helped Green Bay remain competitive throughout the matchup.
5. Defensive Takeaways Were Missing
Neither team recorded an interception.
Both defenses managed only one sack.
The lack of turnovers and limited quarterback pressure allowed the offenses to continue producing points.
What the Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The numbers provide a broader picture of how Green Bay and Dallas approached the matchup.
Green Bay Packers: Offensive Strengths and Challenges
Green Bay demonstrated several offensive strengths.
Its quarterback completed more than 70% of his passes, its leading running back contributed in both rushing and receiving, and multiple players produced useful receiving yardage.
The team’s 164 rushing yards also showed that the offense did not depend entirely on passing production.
However, the defensive statistics reveal areas that require attention.
The Packers recorded only one sack and allowed Prescott to throw three touchdowns.
They also allowed Pickens to generate 134 receiving yards.
From a statistical perspective, Green Bay’s offensive balance was a major positive, but its defensive performance did not consistently restrict Dallas.
Dallas Cowboys: Offensive Strengths and Challenges
Dallas produced an efficient passing performance.
Prescott completed 77.5% of his attempts, threw three touchdowns, and recorded a passer rating of 124.9.
Pickens was highly productive, and Williams provided a dependable rushing option.
Turpin also generated 175 kick-return yards.
However, the Cowboys allowed Green Bay to produce 164 rushing yards.
They also struggled to create takeaways.
The defensive unit recorded only one sack and one pass defended.
Those numbers help explain why Green Bay was able to remain competitive and score 40 points.
How to Read NFL Match Player Statistics Correctly
Understanding individual statistics is useful, but the most accurate analysis comes from examining several categories together.
Here are some important measurements to consider when evaluating a football matchup.
Passing Efficiency
Passing yards show how much production a quarterback generates through the air.
However, they should be considered alongside:
- Completion percentage.
- Yards per attempt.
- Touchdown passes.
- Interceptions.
- Sacks.
- Passer rating.
In this matchup, Love produced more passing yards, but Prescott recorded the higher completion percentage and passer rating.
Rushing Efficiency
Rushing attempts and total yards provide a basic overview of a team’s ground game.
Yards per carry help explain how productive those attempts were.
Jacobs averaged 3.9 yards per carry, while Williams averaged 4.3.
However, the Packers generated more total rushing yards because they recorded more attempts and received additional production from Wilson and Love.
Receiving Production
Receiving statistics should include more than total yards.
Targets help explain how frequently a player was involved in the passing game.
Receptions indicate successful catches, while yards per reception measure average production on completed passes.
Touchdowns show how frequently a player finished scoring opportunities.
Pickens led Dallas in yardage, while Doubs led Green Bay in receiving touchdowns.
Defensive Impact
A useful defensive evaluation includes:
- Total and solo tackles.
- Sacks.
- Tackles for loss.
- Passes defended.
- Quarterback hits.
- Interceptions.
- Defensive touchdowns.
These numbers help explain how well a defense disrupted the opponent’s offensive plans.
For this game, the most important defensive observation is that neither team generated an interception.
Official Box Score and Statistical Verification
For readers who want to check individual player performances, the original ESPN game record is the primary reference for the supplied figures.
The official box score can be accessed through the ESPN Packers vs Cowboys game statistics.
When comparing the numbers, it is important to distinguish between individual player statistics and team totals.
The supplied data contains a discrepancy in Green Bay’s passing production:
- Jordan Love’s individual line lists 337 passing yards.
- The Packers’ team passing line lists 325 yards.
- The Packers’ receiving total lists 337 yards.
These figures do not agree.
For that reason, this article preserves the supplied player statistics while identifying the difference rather than silently changing the numbers.
Readers should verify the official record before using the disputed team passing total in further calculations.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Packers vs Cowboys game on September 28, 2025?
The Green Bay Packers and Dallas Cowboys finished in a 40-40 tie after overtime. Both teams scored three points during the overtime period.
2. How many passing yards did Jordan Love record against Dallas?
Jordan Love’s individual passing line lists 337 yards, three touchdown passes, and zero interceptions. The supplied Packers team passing total differs, listing 325 yards.
3. How many passing yards did Dak Prescott record against Green Bay?
Dak Prescott recorded 319 passing yards, three touchdown passes, and zero interceptions. He completed 31 of 40 attempts and finished with a passer rating of 124.9.
4. Who was the leading receiver in the Packers vs Cowboys matchup?
George Pickens was the leading receiver by yardage. He recorded eight receptions for 134 yards and two touchdowns for Dallas.
5. How many touchdowns did Romeo Doubs score?
Romeo Doubs recorded three receiving touchdowns for Green Bay. He finished with six receptions for 58 yards on eight targets.
6. Which team had more rushing yards?
Green Bay had more rushing yards. The Packers recorded 164 yards on 35 carries, while Dallas finished with 117 yards on 26 carries.
Conclusion
The September 28, 2025, meeting between the Green Bay Packers and Dallas Cowboys was an outstanding example of offensive production and competitive football. The 40-40 overtime tie reflected the ability of both teams to generate points, respond to difficult situations, and maintain offensive pressure throughout the game.
Jordan Love and Dak Prescott each completed 31 passes and threw three touchdowns without an interception. Love produced more passing yards according to his individual player line, while Prescott recorded a higher completion percentage and passer rating.
Josh Jacobs was a major contributor for Green Bay, finishing with 86 rushing yards, two rushing touchdowns, and 71 receiving yards. Romeo Doubs added three receiving touchdowns, while Matthew Golden and Tucker Kraft provided additional receiving production.
For Dallas, George Pickens delivered the most impressive receiving performance with 134 yards and two touchdowns. Dak Prescott remained efficient throughout the contest, and Javonte Williams contributed 85 rushing yards and one touchdown.
Green Bay finished with a 47-yard advantage in rushing production, while Dallas generated more kick-return yardage and had more total defensive tackles. Neither defense recorded an interception, and both managed only one sack.
Ultimately, the statistics show that the two teams were closely matched offensively. Green Bay had an advantage on the ground, Dallas received outstanding production from Pickens, and both quarterbacks played important roles in reaching the 40-point mark.
The green bay packers vs dallas cowboys match player stats provide a detailed picture of a memorable contest in which individual excellence, balanced offensive production, and late-game scoring combined to produce an unusual NFL result.
