Los Angeles Chargers vs New York Giants Match Player Stats
The los angeles chargers vs new york giants match player stats from the September 28, 2025 meeting at MetLife Stadium tell a much more detailed story than the final 21-18 score. The New York Giants defeated the Los Angeles Chargers in a game where both teams produced strong rushing numbers, but the Giants created the decisive advantage through turnovers, time of possession, red-zone execution, and defensive pressure. The Chargers finished with 338 total yards compared with 250 for New York, yet Los Angeles could not convert its yardage advantage into enough points.
For readers studying the box score, fantasy football implications, team performance, or individual player production, this game is particularly interesting because several players produced numbers that look very different once they are placed in context. Omarion Hampton rushed for 128 yards and a touchdown on only 12 carries, Quentin Johnston caught eight passes for 98 yards and a touchdown, and Justin Herbert added 24 rushing yards. On the other side, Jaxson Dart combined passing and rushing contributions while Cam Skattebo handled a heavy rushing workload.
The Giants ultimately won because their defense produced two interceptions, their offense controlled the clock, and their rushing attack generated 161 yards on 42 attempts. The Chargers gained 152 rushing yards on only 13 attempts, showing how explosive their running production was, but their passing game included two costly interceptions.
Game Overview
The matchup took place on Sunday, September 28, 2025, at MetLife Stadium. The Giants entered the contest at 1-3 after the game, while the Chargers moved to 3-1. The final score was:
New York Giants 21, Los Angeles Chargers 18
The official gamebook records 17 first downs for Los Angeles and 20 for New York. The Chargers gained 338 total yards, while the Giants finished with 250. Los Angeles averaged 6.0 yards per offensive play compared with 3.6 for New York.
That contrast is one of the most important aspects of the game.
The Chargers were more efficient in terms of total yardage and explosive gains. The Giants, however, ran 69 offensive plays compared with 56 for Los Angeles and held the ball for 35:28 compared with 24:32. That additional possession time helped New York overcome its lower yards-per-play figure.
Final Score
| Team | Score |
| New York Giants | 21 |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 18 |
Team Production
| Category | Chargers | Giants |
| Total yards | 338 | 250 |
| Rushing yards | 152 | 161 |
| Net passing yards | 186 | 89 |
| Offensive plays | 56 | 69 |
| First downs | 17 | 20 |
| Third down | 4/12 | 7/15 |
| Time of possession | 24:32 | 35:28 |
| Turnovers | 2 INT | 0 INT |
| Sacks allowed | 2 | 6 |
| Penalties | 14-107 | 8-43 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Field goals | 1/1 | 2/2 |
The statistical picture shows why simply looking at total yards can be misleading. Los Angeles moved the ball efficiently, but New York was better at maintaining possession and avoiding offensive turnovers.
Los Angeles Chargers vs New York Giants Match Player Stats
The los angeles chargers vs new york giants match player stats are especially useful when separating individual production from team efficiency.
Justin Herbert completed 23 of 41 passes for 203 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. He was also sacked twice for 17 yards. His official passer rating was 57.3, with a QBR of 39.1.
Those numbers do not tell the whole story because Herbert also rushed once for 24 yards. That single carry produced an average of 24.0 yards per attempt and represented one of the Chargers’ most explosive rushing plays.
Jaxson Dart completed 13 of 20 passes for 111 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. He was sacked five times for 25 yards. His passer rating was 96.0, while his QBR was listed at 47.4.
Dart also rushed 10 times for 54 yards and a touchdown. His combined rushing and passing contribution gave the Giants another dimension that was important in a low-scoring contest.
Russell Wilson appeared briefly and completed his only pass for eight yards. He was also sacked once for five yards.
Justin Herbert’s Passing Performance
Herbert’s final passing line was:
- 23 completions
- 41 attempts
- 203 passing yards
- 5.0 yards per attempt
- 1 touchdown
- 2 interceptions
- 2 sacks
- 17 sack yards lost
- 57.3 passer rating
- 39.1 QBR
The most important issue was not simply the completion percentage. Herbert completed 56.1% of his attempts, but the two interceptions gave the Giants valuable possessions.
Los Angeles also struggled to turn its offensive opportunities into touchdowns. The Chargers had one red-zone possession and did not score a touchdown from it, according to the official team statistics.
That becomes particularly significant when comparing the Chargers’ 338 total yards with their 18 points.
Jaxson Dart’s Efficient Debut-Level Contribution
Dart’s 13-of-20 passing performance produced 111 yards and a touchdown without an interception. His 96.0 passer rating was considerably higher than Herbert’s 57.3 rating in this specific game.
However, the Giants did not rely heavily on Dart’s passing volume.
Instead, his rushing production was important.
Dart carried the ball 10 times for 54 yards, averaging 5.4 yards per carry, and scored one rushing touchdown. His rushing contribution helped the Giants sustain drives and gave their offense an option beyond conventional passing.
The five sacks he absorbed also show where the Chargers were able to create pressure.
Omarion Hampton’s Breakout Rushing Performance
One of the clearest individual statistical highlights was Omarion Hampton’s rushing performance.
Hampton carried 12 times for:
- 128 yards
- 10.7 yards per carry
- 1 touchdown
- 54-yard long run
A 10.7-yard rushing average is remarkable for a player receiving 12 carries. His 54-yard run was also the longest rushing play recorded by either team.
The Chargers finished with 152 rushing yards despite only 13 rushing attempts. Hampton accounted for 128 of those yards, meaning he produced the overwhelming majority of Los Angeles’ rushing output.
The math illustrates how unusual the performance was.
Hampton generated 128 of the Chargers’ 152 rushing yards. That means he accounted for approximately 84% of the team’s rushing yardage.
Justin Herbert’s 24-yard run accounted for most of the remainder.
Why Hampton’s Numbers Matter
A running back can accumulate yards through volume, but Hampton did it through efficiency.
Twelve carries for 128 yards means the Chargers did not need a large number of rushing attempts to create significant yardage. His 54-yard gain also changed the field-position equation immediately.
However, the Chargers’ limited rushing volume is worth noticing.
Los Angeles attempted only 13 rushing plays compared with 42 by New York. That difference meant the Giants had many more opportunities to control possession through the ground game.
The Chargers had explosive rushing production.
The Giants had sustained rushing volume.
That distinction is central to understanding the game.
Cam Skattebo’s Workload
Cam Skattebo led the Giants in rushing attempts.
His line:
- 25 carries
- 79 yards
- 3.2 yards per carry
- 16-yard long
- 0 rushing touchdowns
The 3.2-yard average was not spectacular, but his workload was extremely important.
Skattebo carried the ball 25 times, nearly twice as many times as the Chargers’ entire rushing total of 13 attempts.
This is an example of why yards per carry should not always be evaluated in isolation. A running back receiving 25 carries can contribute to offensive structure even when individual runs are modest.
Skattebo also caught two passes for 11 yards.
His total involvement therefore extended beyond rushing.
Jaxson Dart’s Rushing Contribution
Dart was the Giants’ second-leading rusher with 54 yards.
His 10 carries produced a 5.4-yard average and included a 15-yard long run and a touchdown.
When combined with Skattebo’s 79 yards and Devin Singletary’s 28 yards, the Giants produced 161 rushing yards.
That rushing total exceeded the Chargers’ 152 yards despite the Chargers having the much higher yards-per-carry figure.
The difference came from volume.
Chargers Receiving Statistics
Quentin Johnston was the standout receiver for Los Angeles.
His performance:
- 8 receptions
- 98 yards
- 12.3 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
- 36-yard long
- 13 targets
Johnston led the Chargers in receptions, receiving yards, targets, and touchdowns.
His 36-yard reception was the longest Chargers receiving play listed in the game data.
The volume is also important. Johnston received 13 of Los Angeles’ 38 team targets. That means more than one-third of the Chargers’ passing targets went his way.
Keenan Allen
Keenan Allen finished with five receptions for 37 yards on seven targets.
His average was 7.4 yards per reception, and his longest catch was 10 yards.
Allen therefore provided a reliable short-to-intermediate option but did not produce the same explosive yardage as Johnston.
Omarion Hampton as a Receiver
Hampton also contributed through the passing game.
He caught five passes for 37 yards on five targets, averaging 7.4 yards per reception. His longest reception covered 19 yards.
Combining his rushing and receiving output gives Hampton:
- 128 rushing yards
- 1 rushing touchdown
- 37 receiving yards
- 165 total yards from scrimmage
That makes his individual production one of the most notable statistical stories from the game.
Other Chargers Receivers
Oronde Gadsden caught two passes for 16 yards.
Ladd McConkey caught one pass for 11 yards on six targets.
Tyler Conklin caught one pass for three yards.
The distribution shows that Johnston received the strongest combination of targets, receptions, yardage, and scoring production.
Giants Receiving Statistics
The Giants’ passing game produced 119 gross passing yards, with 89 net passing yards after sacks.
Darius Slayton led the team in receiving yards.
His line:
- 3 receptions
- 44 yards
- 14.7 yards per reception
- 18-yard long
- 4 targets
Malik Nabers finished with two receptions for 20 yards on three targets.
Theo Johnson caught three passes for 17 yards and scored the Giants’ receiving touchdown.
Wan’Dale Robinson recorded three receptions for 14 yards.
Daniel Bellinger caught one pass for 13 yards.
Cam Skattebo added two receptions for 11 yards.
The Giants therefore used a broad distribution of receivers even though the overall passing output remained limited.
Defensive Statistics and Turnovers
The defensive side of the los angeles chargers vs new york giants match player stats provides perhaps the clearest explanation for the final result.
The Chargers recorded:
- 90 total tackles
- 47 solo tackles
- 6 sacks
- 8 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 9 quarterback hits
- 0 interceptions
The Giants recorded:
- 52 total tackles
- 35 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 7 passes defended
- 12 quarterback hits
- 0 defensive touchdowns
- 2 interceptions
The Giants produced fewer sacks but generated two interceptions.
That tradeoff mattered.
Dru Phillips’ Interception
Dru Phillips intercepted Herbert and returned the ball 56 yards.
That was the longer of the Giants’ two interception returns.
A turnover of that magnitude can completely change field position without requiring the offense to gain a single yard.
Dexter Lawrence II’s Interception
Dexter Lawrence II also intercepted Herbert.
His return covered 37 yards.
Together, the Giants’ defense produced 93 interception-return yards.
The Chargers had no interceptions.
That created a two-turnover advantage for New York.
Turnover Battle
The turnover comparison was straightforward:
| Category | Chargers | Giants |
| Interceptions thrown | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions made | 0 | 2 |
| Fumbles | 0 | 2 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 0 |
| Total turnovers lost | 2 | 0 |
The Giants did fumble twice, but neither fumble was lost.
Russell Wilson recorded one fumble that was recovered by himself. Jaxson Dart also fumbled, while Andrew Thomas recorded a recovery.
The result was a clean turnover differential for New York.
Third Down and Possession
Another important area was third-down efficiency.
The Chargers converted 4 of 12 third downs, a rate of 33.3%.
The Giants converted 7 of 15, or 46.7%.
That difference helped New York extend drives.
The Giants also possessed the ball for 35:28.
Los Angeles had possession for 24:32.
The Giants therefore controlled the clock for nearly 11 additional minutes.
This was particularly important because New York ran 69 offensive plays compared with only 56 for Los Angeles.
More plays created more opportunities to sustain drives, even though the Giants averaged fewer yards per play.
Red-Zone Performance
Red-zone efficiency was another deciding factor.
The Chargers went 0-for-1 in the red zone.
The Giants went 2-for-5.
This is an important statistical distinction.
Los Angeles generated 338 yards but failed to score a red-zone touchdown on its only listed opportunity. The Giants had five red-zone opportunities and converted two into touchdowns.
The Giants also made both of their field-goal attempts.
That meant New York consistently converted scoring opportunities into points.
Special Teams Breakdown
Special teams played a supporting role in the final margin.
Chargers Kicking
Cameron Dicker:
- 1 field goal made on 1 attempt
- Long: 43 yards
- 1 extra point
- 4 total points
Giants Kicking
Jude McAtamney:
- 2 field goals made on 2 attempts
- Long: 31 yards
- 1 extra point
- 7 total points
McAtamney’s two field goals provided six points before the extra point was included in the total.
Punting
JK Scott punted five times for 244 yards, averaging 48.8 yards per punt.
Jamie Gillan also punted five times for 244 yards, also averaging 48.8 yards.
The gross punting numbers were identical.
However, Los Angeles finished with three punts inside the 20, while New York also recorded three.
Return Game
The Giants had an advantage in kickoff return yardage.
New York returned four kickoffs for 107 yards, averaging 26.8 yards per return.
The Chargers returned three kickoffs for 73 yards, averaging 24.3 yards.
For punt returns, Tarheeb Still returned four punts for 25 yards for Los Angeles.
Gunner Olszewski returned two punts for 14 yards for New York.
The most notable difference was therefore the kickoff return total, where New York generated 34 more yards.
Penalties
Penalty yardage was another factor that should not be ignored.
The Chargers committed 14 penalties for 107 yards.
The Giants committed eight penalties for 43 yards.
That gave Los Angeles 64 more penalty yards.
Despite gaining 88 more total yards than New York, the Chargers repeatedly gave away yardage through penalties.
From a game-analysis perspective, this is one reason raw offensive yardage should not be treated as a complete measure of performance.
Where the Chargers Had the Advantage
The Chargers clearly won several statistical categories.
Total Yardage
Los Angeles gained 338 yards compared with 250 for New York.
That was an 88-yard advantage.
Rushing Efficiency
The Chargers averaged 11.7 yards per rushing attempt.
The Giants averaged 3.8.
This difference was enormous.
Hampton’s 128-yard performance was the main driver.
Passing Yardage
Los Angeles generated 186 net passing yards compared with 89 for New York.
Herbert’s 203 gross passing yards also exceeded the Giants’ 119 gross passing yards.
Explosive Plays
The Chargers produced several major gains, including Hampton’s 54-yard run and Johnston’s 36-yard touchdown reception.
These plays explain why the Chargers’ total yardage was substantially higher.
Where the Giants Had the Advantage
New York controlled several areas that are closely connected with winning football games.
Turnovers
The Giants intercepted Herbert twice.
The Chargers intercepted no Giants passes.
Possession
New York controlled the ball for 35:28.
Offensive Volume
The Giants ran 69 offensive plays.
The Chargers ran 56.
Third Down
New York converted 46.7% of third downs.
Los Angeles converted 33.3%.
Red Zone
The Giants scored touchdowns on two of five red-zone trips.
The Chargers failed to score a red-zone touchdown on their listed opportunity.
Penalty Discipline
New York committed six fewer penalties and lost 64 fewer penalty yards.
These categories collectively helped explain why the team with fewer total yards still won.
What the Box Score Teaches
A useful way to understand this game is to divide production into three categories: efficiency, volume, and possession value.
The Chargers dominated efficiency in several areas.
Hampton averaged 10.7 yards per carry.
The Chargers averaged 11.7 yards per rushing attempt as a team.
Los Angeles gained 6.0 yards per offensive play.
The Giants, by contrast, averaged 3.6 yards per offensive play.
But New York won the volume battle.
The Giants ran 69 plays.
They possessed the ball for 35:28.
They attempted 42 rushing plays.
And they converted more third downs.
The Giants also won the possession-value battle by creating two interceptions without throwing one.
This combination produced a narrow three-point victory despite the substantial yardage disadvantage.
Player Performance Takeaways
Several individual performances deserve special attention.
Omarion Hampton
Hampton was one of the game’s most productive players statistically.
His 128 rushing yards and touchdown came on only 12 carries. Adding 37 receiving yards gives him 165 yards from scrimmage.
His 54-yard run demonstrated elite big-play potential.
Quentin Johnston
Johnston led the Chargers’ receiving group with 98 yards and a touchdown.
His 13 targets also made him the focal point of the Chargers passing attack.
Justin Herbert
Herbert produced 203 passing yards and a touchdown but also threw two interceptions.
His 24 rushing yards provided additional value, but the turnovers significantly affected the game.
Jaxson Dart
Dart completed 65% of his passes, threw one touchdown without an interception, and added 54 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown.
His five sacks show that the Chargers defense was able to pressure him effectively.
Cam Skattebo
Skattebo’s 25 rushing attempts represented a major workload.
He gained 79 yards and helped New York maintain a run-heavy offensive approach.
Giants Defense
The Giants defense recorded two interceptions and 12 quarterback hits.
Although the Chargers recorded more sacks, New York’s ability to create turnovers proved highly consequential.
Fantasy Football Perspective
For fantasy football analysis, the box score provides several useful lessons.
Hampton’s 165 yards from scrimmage and two total touchdowns created strong individual value. His 12 rushing attempts show that explosive efficiency can compensate for a lower workload.
Johnston’s eight receptions, 98 yards, and touchdown also represent strong receiving production.
Herbert’s fantasy output is more complicated because his passing yardage was respectable, but the two interceptions reduced his value in formats that penalize turnovers.
Dart’s rushing production adds an important fantasy dimension. Quarterbacks who contribute on the ground can accumulate useful fantasy points even when passing volume is limited.
Skattebo’s 25 rushing attempts indicate substantial opportunity, although his 3.2-yard average limited the efficiency of that workload.
Fantasy managers should therefore distinguish between volume and efficiency rather than relying solely on the final score.
How to Read This Game Beyond the Final Score
A common mistake when reviewing an NFL box score is to assume that the team with more yards played the better statistical game in every category.
This matchup demonstrates why that approach is incomplete.
Los Angeles generated:
- 338 total yards
- 152 rushing yards
- 186 net passing yards
- 6.0 yards per play
Yet the Chargers lost.
New York generated:
- 250 total yards
- 161 rushing yards
- 89 net passing yards
- 3.6 yards per play
Yet the Giants won.
The difference came from situational football.
New York created two interceptions.
The Giants converted 7 of 15 third downs.
They held the ball for more than 35 minutes.
They scored two touchdowns on five red-zone trips.
They committed fewer penalties.
That combination allowed them to survive the Chargers’ explosive offensive production.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Chargers and Giants?
The New York Giants defeated the Los Angeles Chargers 21-18 on September 28, 2025, at MetLife Stadium.
Who led the Chargers in rushing?
Omarion Hampton led Los Angeles with 128 rushing yards and one touchdown on 12 carries.
Who led the Chargers in receiving?
Quentin Johnston led the Chargers with eight receptions for 98 yards and one touchdown on 13 targets.
How did Justin Herbert perform?
Justin Herbert completed 23 of 41 passes for 203 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. He also rushed for 24 yards.
How did Jaxson Dart perform?
Jaxson Dart completed 13 of 20 passes for 111 yards and one touchdown without an interception. He also rushed for 54 yards and a touchdown.
Why did the Giants win despite having fewer yards?
New York created two interceptions, controlled possession for 35:28, converted 46.7% of its third downs, and scored two touchdowns in five red-zone trips.
Conclusion
The los angeles chargers vs new york giants match player stats show a game defined by contrast. Los Angeles produced more total yardage, more passing yardage, and dramatically better rushing efficiency. Omarion Hampton delivered 128 rushing yards and a touchdown, while Quentin Johnston provided 98 receiving yards and a touchdown.
New York countered with volume and situational execution. The Giants ran 69 offensive plays, rushed 42 times for 161 yards, held possession for 35:28, and converted two Chargers interceptions into valuable field-position opportunities. Jaxson Dart contributed both through the air and on the ground, while Cam Skattebo handled 25 rushing attempts.
The most important lesson from the box score is that yardage alone does not determine the outcome of an NFL game. Turnovers, third-down conversions, red-zone efficiency, possession time, penalties, and explosive plays all interact to determine how production becomes points.
For this matchup, the Chargers generated more yards, but the Giants generated the combination of possession control and turnover advantage that ultimately produced the 21-18 result.
