Kansas City Chiefs vs Los Angeles Chargers Match Player Stats
The kansas city chiefs vs los angeles chargers match player stats from the 2025 NFL season opener tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Los Angeles defeated Kansas City 27-21 in São Paulo, with Justin Herbert throwing for 318 yards and three touchdowns while Patrick Mahomes produced 258 passing yards, one passing touchdown, and another score on the ground. The official NFL game data confirms the six-point result and the quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern.
The game was decided by several connected factors rather than one isolated statistic. Herbert created more explosive passing production, the Chargers converted their opportunities through the air, and Los Angeles maintained enough control late in the game to prevent Kansas City from completing the comeback.
Kansas City still generated useful offensive numbers. The Chiefs averaged 5.8 yards per rushing attempt, Mahomes added 57 rushing yards, and Marquise “Hollywood” Brown caught 10 passes for 99 yards. However, the Chargers produced 318 passing yards compared with Kansas City’s 258, and Herbert’s three touchdown passes gave Los Angeles the scoring efficiency it needed.
For readers researching player production, this game provides a useful example of why box-score analysis should go beyond passing yards. Completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdown efficiency, rushing contributions, target distribution, sacks, and scoring by quarter all help explain how a 27-21 game actually developed.
Kansas City Chiefs vs Los Angeles Chargers Match Player Stats at a Glance
The game took place during Week 1 of the 2025 NFL regular season in São Paulo, Brazil. The NFL’s official schedule lists the international matchup as Chiefs 21, Chargers 27, with Kansas City starting 0-1 and Los Angeles starting 1-0.
| Category | Kansas City Chiefs | Los Angeles Chargers |
| Final Score | 21 | 27 |
| Passing Yards | 258 | 318 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Rushing Attempts | 17 | 25 |
| Rushing Yards | 98 | 90 |
| Rushing Average | 5.8 | 3.6 |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Receptions | 24 | 25 |
| Receiving Yards | 258 | 318 |
| Receiving TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Team Sacks | 3 | 2 |
| Team Tackles | 60 | 60 |
| Fumbles | 1 | 1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 0 |
One of the most interesting aspects of the game is that Kansas City actually averaged more yards per rushing attempt than Los Angeles. The Chiefs gained 98 yards on 17 carries, while the Chargers gained 90 yards on 25 attempts. That difference did not translate into a Kansas City victory because Los Angeles created a larger advantage through its passing game.
Patrick Mahomes Passing Performance
Patrick Mahomes completed 24 of 39 passes for 258 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. His 6.6 yards per attempt and 89.5 passer rating show a productive but not dominant passing performance. The official NFL statistics also credit him with two sacks for nine yards.
Mahomes’ completion rate was:
24 completions ÷ 39 attempts = 61.5%
That is a respectable completion rate, but the more important difference was efficiency and scoring production. Herbert completed a higher percentage of his throws, averaged considerably more yards per attempt, and threw three touchdowns.
Mahomes also contributed heavily as a runner.
He carried the ball six times for 57 yards, averaging 9.5 yards per attempt, with a 15-yard long and one rushing touchdown. That made him Kansas City’s leading rusher.
His rushing production was particularly important because the Chiefs’ other primary runners did not produce the same explosive impact.
Justin Herbert Passing Performance
Justin Herbert was the statistical standout in the Chargers’ passing game.
He completed 25 of 34 attempts for 318 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions. He averaged 9.4 yards per attempt and finished with a 131.7 passer rating based on the supplied game data.
His completion rate was:
25 completions ÷ 34 attempts = 73.5%
That was nearly 12 percentage points higher than Mahomes’ completion rate.
The difference becomes even clearer when looking at yards per attempt:
- Patrick Mahomes: 6.6 yards per attempt
- Justin Herbert: 9.4 yards per attempt
Herbert therefore generated substantially more yardage each time he attempted a pass. The NFL’s postgame coverage highlighted his 318-yard, three-touchdown performance and his late 19-yard scramble on third-and-14 that helped secure the victory.
That final rushing play also illustrates why quarterback statistics should not be separated completely from game context. Herbert’s passing numbers were the foundation of the Chargers’ offense, but his legs helped close the game when Kansas City still had an opportunity.
Passing Efficiency Was the Central Statistical Difference
The two quarterbacks produced similar completion totals, but their overall efficiency was different.
Mahomes:
- 39 attempts
- 24 completions
- 258 yards
- 6.6 yards per attempt
- 1 touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 89.5 passer rating
Herbert:
- 34 attempts
- 25 completions
- 318 yards
- 9.4 yards per attempt
- 3 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 131.7 passer rating
The Chargers therefore completed one more pass while attempting five fewer throws.
More importantly, Los Angeles gained 60 more passing yards and three times as many passing touchdowns.
This is a useful distinction for anyone studying kansas city chiefs vs los angeles chargers match player stats. A simple comparison of completions would suggest the quarterbacks were relatively close. A deeper examination shows that Herbert generated considerably more value from his attempts.
Kansas City Rushing Statistics
Kansas City recorded 98 rushing yards on 17 carries, an average of 5.8 yards per attempt.
The leading Kansas City rushers were:
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | Long | TD |
| Patrick Mahomes | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 15 | 1 |
| Isiah Pacheco | 5 | 25 | 5.0 | 10 | 0 |
| Kareem Hunt | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 6 | 0 |
| Xavier Worthy | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Mahomes was not simply the quarterback who happened to scramble a few times. He was Kansas City’s most productive individual runner in this game.
His 57 rushing yards represented more than half of the Chiefs’ total rushing yardage.
Pacheco added 25 yards on five attempts, while Hunt produced 16 yards on five carries.
The distribution is important because Kansas City achieved a strong team rushing average without receiving a large volume of carries. Seventeen rushing attempts is considerably lower than the Chargers’ 25 attempts.
The Chiefs’ rushing game was therefore efficient in a small sample, but the offense remained heavily dependent on Mahomes’ passing ability.
Los Angeles Chargers Rushing Statistics
Los Angeles carried the ball 25 times for 90 yards, averaging 3.6 yards per attempt.
Omarion Hampton led the Chargers in rushing:
- 15 carries
- 48 yards
- 3.2 yards per carry
- 11-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
The Chargers did not dominate on the ground statistically. In fact, Kansas City produced 98 rushing yards compared with Los Angeles’ 90.
That is an important point because the final result was not created by a superior rushing total.
Instead, Los Angeles balanced its offense through volume on the ground while receiving high-value production from Herbert’s passing attack.
This is one of the clearest lessons from the kansas city chiefs vs los angeles chargers match player stats. Team rushing yards and rushing efficiency do not always determine which offense controls the scoreboard.
Marquise Brown Led Kansas City in Receiving
Marquise Brown was Kansas City’s leading receiver with 10 catches for 99 yards on 16 targets.
His receiving line:
- 16 targets
- 10 receptions
- 99 yards
- 9.9 yards per reception
- 49-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
Brown’s 10 receptions accounted for a large portion of Mahomes’ completed passes.
His 16 targets were also significant because Kansas City lost wide receiver Xavier Worthy during the game after an early collision. NFL reporting confirmed that Worthy exited with a shoulder injury and was ruled out during the second quarter.
That development matters when evaluating the receiving numbers.
Brown’s high target total was not simply a random statistical result. Kansas City’s receiving options were affected during the game, increasing the importance of the available targets for Brown, JuJu Smith-Schuster, Travis Kelce, and Tyquan Thornton.
Other Kansas City Receiving Leaders
Behind Brown, JuJu Smith-Schuster recorded five receptions for 55 yards on five targets.
Travis Kelce finished with two receptions for 47 yards and one touchdown. His average of 23.5 yards per reception was the highest among Kansas City players with multiple receptions in the supplied statistics.
Tyquan Thornton added two receptions for 41 yards.
The distribution looked like this:
| Receiver | Targets | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Marquise Brown | 16 | 10 | 99 | 9.9 | 0 |
| JuJu Smith-Schuster | 5 | 5 | 55 | 11.0 | 0 |
| Travis Kelce | 4 | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 1 |
| Tyquan Thornton | 4 | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 0 |
| Kareem Hunt | 3 | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Isiah Pacheco | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Noah Gray | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Xavier Worthy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
The numbers show a notable contrast between volume and efficiency.
Brown supplied the largest workload, while Kelce and Thornton generated more yards per catch on fewer receptions.
That distinction can be useful when analyzing fantasy football, player usage, or future matchup expectations. High reception volume does not automatically mean the highest yards-per-catch production.
Quentin Johnston Emerged as Los Angeles’ Leading Receiver
Quentin Johnston led the Chargers in receiving with five receptions for 79 yards and two touchdowns.
His statistical line was:
- 7 targets
- 5 receptions
- 79 yards
- 15.8 yards per reception
- 33-yard long
- 2 touchdowns
The two touchdowns were particularly important because Herbert threw three touchdown passes in total.
Johnston therefore accounted for two-thirds of Herbert’s passing touchdowns.
His 15.8 yards per reception also demonstrates the type of explosive receiving efficiency Los Angeles generated.
Compared with Brown’s 99 yards, Johnston had fewer total yards, but he produced considerably more scoring impact.
The Chargers’ Receiving Production Was More Efficient
Los Angeles completed 25 passes for 318 yards, matching its passing total to its receiving total.
Kansas City completed 24 passes for 258 yards.
The difference was not simply the number of completions. Los Angeles produced more yards with nearly every major passing efficiency measure.
The team-level comparison was:
| Passing Metric | Chiefs | Chargers |
| Completions | 24 | 25 |
| Attempts | 39 | 34 |
| Completion Rate | 61.5% | 73.5% |
| Passing Yards | 258 | 318 |
| Yards per Attempt | 6.6 | 9.4 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
The Chargers’ advantage was therefore built around efficient passing rather than simply throwing the ball more often.
That is a major reason the final score ended at 27-21.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring pattern was:
| Quarter | Chiefs | Chargers |
| Q1 | 0 | 7 |
| Q2 | 6 | 6 |
| Q3 | 6 | 7 |
| Q4 | 9 | 7 |
| Final | 21 | 27 |
The Chargers established the initial advantage by scoring seven points in the opening quarter while Kansas City was held scoreless.
Kansas City improved its scoring output in the second half, but Los Angeles continued to answer.
The fourth quarter was especially important. The Chiefs scored nine points, their highest output of any quarter, but the Chargers added seven more.
That prevented Kansas City’s late push from becoming a successful comeback.
The final margin was six points, but the Chargers never surrendered the lead in the scoring pattern shown by the official game record.
Sacks and Defensive Production
The defensive numbers were relatively close.
Both teams recorded 60 total tackles.
Kansas City recorded:
- 60 total tackles
- 42 solo tackles
- 3 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
Los Angeles recorded:
- 60 total tackles
- 36 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 3 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 8 quarterback hits
The difference in quarterback hits is worth noting.
Los Angeles generated eight quarterback hits despite recording only two sacks. Kansas City produced four quarterback hits and three sacks.
That suggests the defensive pressure was not identical in form.
Kansas City converted a higher share of its recorded quarterback pressure into sacks, while Los Angeles generated more overall quarterback hits.
Neither team intercepted a pass, and each team recorded one fumble without losing it.
Turnovers Did Not Decide the Game
Turnovers are often one of the easiest ways to explain an NFL result, but they were not the main separator here.
Both teams had:
- 1 fumble
- 0 fumbles lost
- 0 interceptions
That means neither offense handed the opponent a traditional turnover advantage.
Instead, the game was shaped more by offensive efficiency and touchdown production.
This is another reason the kansas city chiefs vs los angeles chargers match player stats need to be examined beyond the turnover column.
The Chargers did not win because Kansas City repeatedly gave away possessions. They won while both teams avoided losing a fumble and neither quarterback threw an interception.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams also contributed to the statistical profile.
Harrison Butker converted all three of his field-goal attempts for Kansas City, including a long of 59 yards. He finished with nine points, although he missed his only extra-point attempt.
Cameron Dicker converted both of his field-goal attempts and all three extra points for Los Angeles, also scoring nine points.
The kicking comparison was:
| Kicker | Field Goals | FG % | Long | Extra Points | Points |
| Harrison Butker | 3/3 | 100% | 59 | 0/1 | 9 |
| Cameron Dicker | 2/2 | 100% | 39 | 3/3 | 9 |
Kansas City also recorded five kick returns for 147 yards, averaging 29.4 yards per return.
Los Angeles had three kick returns for 67 yards, averaging 22.3 yards.
Kansas City therefore had the stronger kick-return production by the supplied numbers, but that advantage did not overcome Los Angeles’ offensive scoring edge.
Punting Comparison
Kansas City punter Matt Araiza recorded three punts for 116 yards, averaging 38.7 yards with a 40-yard long and one punt inside the 20.
Los Angeles punter JK Scott recorded two punts for 106 yards, averaging 53.0 yards with a 56-yard long.
The raw punting average favored Scott, while Kansas City’s one punt inside the 20 reflects a different type of field-position contribution.
Punting statistics are often overlooked in player-stat searches because they do not appear beside the headline quarterback numbers. However, they can help explain field position and possession management in closely contested games.
What the Numbers Say About Kansas City’s Offense
Kansas City showed several strengths despite the loss.
First, the Chiefs averaged 5.8 yards per rushing attempt.
Second, Mahomes produced 57 rushing yards and one rushing touchdown.
Third, Brown provided a substantial receiving workload with 10 catches and 99 yards.
Fourth, Kansas City did not throw an interception and did not lose its only fumble.
The problem was that the offense did not convert its production into enough touchdowns.
Mahomes threw for 258 yards, but only one of those passing attempts resulted in a touchdown.
The Chiefs also struggled to maintain the same passing efficiency that Herbert produced.
A 61.5% completion rate and 6.6 yards per attempt can produce winning football, but against a quarterback generating 9.4 yards per attempt and three passing touchdowns, the margin for error becomes much smaller.
What the Numbers Say About Los Angeles
Los Angeles’ statistical profile was more concentrated around passing efficiency.
Herbert completed 73.5% of his passes and averaged 9.4 yards per attempt.
The Chargers also produced three passing touchdowns without throwing an interception.
Johnston was a key part of that scoring output, catching two touchdown passes.
At the same time, Los Angeles did not need an overwhelming rushing performance.
The Chargers carried the ball 25 times for 90 yards, which works out to 3.6 yards per attempt.
That tells us something important about the game plan. Los Angeles could maintain rushing volume while relying on Herbert to create the bigger gains through the passing game.
Why Patrick Mahomes’ Rushing Numbers Matter
One of the most interesting individual statistics is Mahomes’ 57 rushing yards.
For a quarterback, 57 yards on six carries is substantial. His 9.5 yards per carry was also significantly higher than the team rushing average of 5.8.
He scored Kansas City’s rushing touchdown and supplied an explosive element that was not available from the other primary runners at the same level.
That production also shows why quarterback rushing statistics should be included when reviewing a complete player performance.
Looking only at Mahomes’ 258 passing yards would miss 57 additional rushing yards and one rushing touchdown.
Why Herbert’s Scrambling Ability Was Important Late
Herbert’s passing performance receives most of the attention, but his late rushing contribution was also important.
With Los Angeles protecting a six-point lead and Kansas City still capable of forcing a final possession, Herbert converted a third-and-14 situation with a 19-yard scramble. NFL coverage identified that play as the game-sealing moment.
That play demonstrates the practical value of quarterback mobility.
The Chargers did not need Herbert to run frequently throughout the game. They needed him to make the right play at a critical moment.
His ability to turn a difficult third-down situation into a first down allowed Los Angeles to continue controlling the clock and move closer to the end of the game.
The Impact of Xavier Worthy’s Early Exit
Xavier Worthy’s injury is another important piece of context when interpreting Kansas City’s receiving numbers.
NFL reporting stated that Worthy exited in the second quarter after an inadvertent collision with Travis Kelce. He had been involved in the offense immediately before the injury.
His absence changed the distribution of opportunities.
Brown ultimately received 16 targets, while Smith-Schuster received five and Kelce received four.
It would be misleading to interpret those target totals as though Kansas City’s original offensive plan remained completely unchanged throughout the game.
The injury created a different receiving environment for the remainder of the contest.
Comparing the Most Important Individual Numbers
A compact player comparison makes the major differences easier to understand.
| Player | Key Production |
| Patrick Mahomes | 24/39, 258 pass yards, 1 pass TD, 0 INT, 57 rush yards, 1 rush TD |
| Justin Herbert | 25/34, 318 pass yards, 3 pass TDs, 0 INT |
| Marquise Brown | 10 receptions, 99 yards, 16 targets |
| Travis Kelce | 2 receptions, 47 yards, 1 TD |
| JuJu Smith-Schuster | 5 receptions, 55 yards |
| Quentin Johnston | 5 receptions, 79 yards, 2 TDs |
| Omarion Hampton | 15 carries, 48 yards |
| Harrison Butker | 3/3 field goals, 9 points |
| Cameron Dicker | 2/2 field goals, 3/3 extra points, 9 points |
These numbers show that several players contributed meaningfully, but the biggest statistical contrast remained the two quarterbacks.
A Deeper Look at Offensive Efficiency
The raw totals can sometimes hide how an offense generated its production.
Kansas City had:
258 passing yards + 98 rushing yards = 356 yards of listed offensive production
Los Angeles had:
318 passing yards + 90 rushing yards = 408 yards
That represents a 52-yard advantage for the Chargers using the supplied passing and rushing totals.
The difference was almost entirely created through the passing game.
Kansas City’s rushing advantage was only eight yards, while Los Angeles held a 60-yard advantage in passing.
That makes the matchup a useful case study in offensive balance.
The Chiefs were more efficient on the ground, but Los Angeles was significantly more productive through the air.
What the Score Says That the Box Score Does Not
The final score was 27-21, but the statistical story is not simply “Chargers had more yards.”
Los Angeles scored 27 points because its passing production was much more effective at producing touchdowns.
Kansas City moved the ball reasonably well but needed more scoring efficiency.
The Chiefs also had to deal with Worthy’s early departure, which affected their receiving depth.
Los Angeles, meanwhile, received a high-efficiency performance from Herbert and two touchdown receptions from Johnston.
The Chargers also protected their advantage late.
That combination explains the result more effectively than any single statistic.
How to Read These Stats for Future Matchups
When evaluating future meetings between the Chiefs and Chargers, several categories from this game provide useful reference points.
Quarterback efficiency
Passing yards alone are not enough.
Compare:
- Completion percentage
- Yards per attempt
- Touchdowns
- Interceptions
- Passer rating
- Sacks
- Scrambling production
These numbers reveal how efficiently each quarterback turned opportunities into offense.
Receiving workload
Target totals can show where an offense is concentrating its passing game.
Brown’s 16 targets were a major part of Kansas City’s offensive distribution.
Johnston’s seven targets produced 79 yards and two touchdowns, showing how target volume and scoring efficiency can differ.
Rushing efficiency
Kansas City’s 5.8 yards per carry compared favorably with Los Angeles’ 3.6.
However, the Chargers attempted eight more rushes.
This means both efficiency and volume should be examined together.
Red-zone and touchdown production
The largest offensive difference was touchdown production.
Herbert threw three touchdown passes.
Mahomes threw one.
Mahomes also added a rushing touchdown, but the Chargers still finished with the greater total.
What Fans Should Not Overinterpret
One Week 1 game can provide useful evidence, but it should not be treated as a complete evaluation of an entire season.
Player roles can change.
Injuries can alter target distribution.
Coaching decisions can change.
Opposing defenses can produce very different results.
For example, Brown’s 16 targets were partly influenced by Worthy’s early exit. That does not automatically mean he would receive exactly 16 targets in every future matchup.
Similarly, Johnston’s two touchdowns demonstrate what happened in this particular game, but they should not by themselves be treated as a prediction of his production in every future contest.
Good statistical analysis separates what happened from what might happen later.
Official Source for the Game Data
For readers who want to verify the scoring and official statistics, the NFL’s official game center provides the matchup record, score, quarter-by-quarter results, and game information. NFL Game Center: Chiefs at Chargers, Week 1
The official NFL statistics should remain the primary reference when checking player totals or correcting numbers from secondary databases.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Chiefs and Chargers?
The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Kansas City Chiefs 27-21 in the 2025 Week 1 matchup. The NFL records the game as an international contest in São Paulo, Brazil.
How many passing yards did Patrick Mahomes have?
Patrick Mahomes completed 24 of 39 passes for 258 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. He also rushed for 57 yards and one touchdown.
How many passing yards did Justin Herbert have?
Justin Herbert completed 25 of 34 passes for 318 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions. His passer rating was 131.7 based on the supplied game statistics.
Who was Kansas City’s leading receiver?
Marquise Brown led Kansas City with 10 receptions for 99 yards on 16 targets.
Who led the Chargers in receiving?
Quentin Johnston led Los Angeles with five receptions for 79 yards and two touchdowns.
Did either team throw an interception?
No. Both Patrick Mahomes and Justin Herbert finished the game without an interception. Each team recorded one fumble, but neither fumble was lost.
Conclusion
The kansas city chiefs vs los angeles chargers match player stats show a game where Los Angeles created its biggest advantage through passing efficiency and touchdown production.
Patrick Mahomes finished with 258 passing yards, one passing touchdown, no interceptions, 57 rushing yards, and one rushing touchdown. Marquise Brown led Kansas City in receiving with 99 yards, while Travis Kelce added a touchdown on two catches.
Justin Herbert delivered 318 passing yards and three touchdowns without an interception. Quentin Johnston was the Chargers’ leading touchdown receiver with two scores, while Omarion Hampton supplied 48 rushing yards on 15 carries.
Kansas City actually averaged more yards per rushing attempt, and both teams finished with 60 tackles. Turnovers were also even because neither side lost a fumble or threw an interception.
The clearest statistical separator was therefore the passing game. Los Angeles completed 25 of 34 passes for 318 yards and three touchdowns, while Kansas City completed 24 of 39 for 258 yards and one touchdown. That difference in passing efficiency and scoring production provided the foundation for the Chargers’ 27-21 victory.
For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful approach is to consider the full statistical picture rather than focusing only on the final score or one headline player. Quarterback efficiency, receiving volume, rushing efficiency, defensive pressure, special teams, scoring distribution, and game context all contributed to the final result.
