The cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats from November 20, 2025, show how Houston secured a 114-104 road victory at Rocket Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. Alperen Sengun led the Rockets with 28 points, while De’Andre Hunter scored 25 points for the Cavaliers. Houston controlled the opening half, survived Cleveland’s third-quarter response, and scored 40 points in the fourth quarter to protect its lead. The game also highlighted Houston’s advantage in rebounding, interior scoring opportunities, and defensive pressure. Cleveland made 12 three-pointers but struggled at the free-throw line, converting only 20 of 32 attempts. These numbers explain the final result more clearly than the score alone.

Cleveland Cavaliers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup featured two competitive teams with winning records at the time. Houston entered the game with a 10-3 record, while Cleveland stood at 10-6. Playing away from home, the Rockets delivered a balanced performance that combined efficient scoring, offensive rebounding, and timely defense.

Houston Rockets

Away team

114

Record: 10-3

FINAL

10-point margin

Cleveland Cavaliers

Home team

104

Record: 10-6

Date

November 20, 2025

Venue

Rocket Arena

Location

Cleveland, Ohio

Attendance

19,432

The Rockets won three of the four quarters. Cleveland’s best period came in the third, when it outscored Houston 30-17. However, Houston’s 16-point advantage in the opening quarter and its strong fourth-quarter finish proved decisive.

The supplied ESPN box score is the basis for the statistics and player figures discussed below.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown

The scoring pattern explains how Houston built its lead and responded when Cleveland threatened to make the game closer.

Quarter	Houston Rockets	Cleveland Cavaliers	Quarter Winner
First quarter	33	19	Houston
Second quarter	24	21	Houston
Third quarter	17	30	Cleveland
Fourth quarter	40	34	Houston
Final score	114	104	Houston

First Quarter: Houston Establishes Control

Houston opened with 33 points, while Cleveland managed only 19. That 14-point difference gave the Rockets an early advantage and forced the Cavaliers to spend much of the game trying to catch up.

A strong opening quarter can shape an entire NBA game. It gives the leading team more freedom to manage possessions and puts pressure on the opponent to improve its shot selection.

Second Quarter: Rockets Maintain Their Lead

Houston added another 24 points in the second quarter, compared with Cleveland’s 21. The Rockets entered halftime with a 57-40 lead.

Cleveland did not allow the gap to grow dramatically in this period, but it also failed to recover enough ground. Houston’s ability to maintain its advantage meant the Cavaliers needed a significant second-half response.

Third Quarter: Cleveland Finds Its Rhythm

The Cavaliers produced their strongest stretch after halftime, scoring 30 points against Houston’s 17. Cleveland reduced the deficit from 17 points at halftime to just four points entering the final quarter.

This was the game’s most important shift in momentum. Cleveland showed it could create more effective scoring possessions and put Houston under pressure. However, the third-quarter comeback did not erase the Rockets’ earlier advantage.

Fourth Quarter: Houston Closes the Game

Houston scored 40 points in the fourth quarter, its highest-scoring period of the night. Cleveland also performed well offensively with 34 points, but the Rockets still won the quarter by six.

The final period demonstrated Houston’s ability to answer pressure with scoring rather than simply trying to defend its lead. The Rockets finished with a 10-point victory.

Complete Team Statistics Comparison

The team totals reveal why Houston won despite Cleveland making more three-pointers. The Rockets collected 12 more rebounds, converted free throws at a much higher rate, and recorded five more steals.

Team statistic	Houston Rockets	Cleveland Cavaliers
Points	114	104
Field goals	41/90	36/81
Field goal percentage	46%	44%
Three-pointers	9/24	12/39
Three-point percentage	38%	31%
Free throws	23/27	20/32
Free-throw percentage	85%	63%
Total rebounds	51	39
Offensive rebounds	16	10
Defensive rebounds	35	29
Assists	23	20
Turnovers	13	12
Steals	9	4
Blocks	4	5
Personal fouls	23	18

Percentages are reported as supplied in the game data. Minor differences can occur when displayed percentages are rounded.

Field Goal Efficiency

Houston made 41 of its 90 field-goal attempts, while Cleveland converted 36 of 81. The Rockets therefore made five more shots from the field.

Houston’s 46% shooting rate was slightly better than Cleveland’s 44%. That difference alone does not explain the entire result, but it helped Houston turn its offensive possessions into points.

Cleveland actually attempted nine fewer field goals. This makes shot selection and possession outcomes especially important when evaluating the game.

Three-Point Shooting

Cleveland made 12 three-pointers compared with Houston’s nine. That gave the Cavaliers a three-point advantage in made shots from beyond the arc.

However, Cleveland attempted 39 three-pointers and converted only 31%. Houston attempted 24 and made 38%.

The distinction is important because the number of successful three-pointers does not tell the whole story. Cleveland took 15 more attempts from long range, yet the Rockets’ higher accuracy helped offset the Cavaliers’ additional makes.

Cleveland’s three-point shooting was not entirely ineffective. The team still scored 36 points from beyond the arc. The problem was that its long-range production did not compensate for the other differences in the game.

Free-Throw Accuracy: A Major Difference

Houston converted 23 of 27 free throws, an 85% success rate. Cleveland made 20 of 32, or 63%.

The Cavaliers attempted five more free throws than Houston but converted only three fewer. Their missed attempts represented a substantial lost scoring opportunity.

Houston’s free-throw advantage was approximately 13 percentage points. The Rockets also scored three more points at the line, despite attempting fewer shots.

This is one of the clearest statistical differences in the matchup. Cleveland’s missed free throws mattered because the team was already trying to overcome a first-half deficit.

Rebounding: Houston Controls More Possessions

Houston collected 51 rebounds, compared with Cleveland’s 39. The Rockets won the overall rebounding battle by 12.

The offensive rebounding figures were particularly revealing:

• Houston: 16 offensive rebounds.
• Cleveland: 10 offensive rebounds.
• Houston’s advantage: six offensive rebounds.

Offensive rebounds can extend possessions after missed shots. They may create second-chance points, force additional defensive rotations, and prevent an opponent from securing the ball cleanly.

Houston also recorded 35 defensive rebounds, six more than Cleveland’s 29. The Rockets therefore had an advantage on both ends of the glass.

Cleveland’s 39 total rebounds were not necessarily poor in isolation. The concern was the difference between the teams and the additional opportunities Houston could generate from its misses.

Assists and Ball Movement

Houston recorded 23 assists, while Cleveland finished with 20.

The three-assist difference suggests a modest advantage in assisted scoring, although assists alone cannot show the full quality of a team’s offense. Some successful possessions involve individual creation, while others depend on screens, cuts, and quick passing.

Alperen Sengun recorded seven assists for Houston, leading the game among the players identified in the supplied statistics. Amen Thompson added six.

For Cleveland, Craig Porter Jr. led with five assists. These figures indicate that Houston had two major contributors to its recorded playmaking, while Porter was the leading facilitator identified for the Cavaliers.

Turnovers and Defensive Pressure

Cleveland committed 12 turnovers, one fewer than Houston’s 13. The Cavaliers therefore had a small advantage in protecting possession.

However, the Rockets recorded nine steals, compared with Cleveland’s four. Amen Thompson led Houston with five steals by himself, giving him a major role in the team’s defensive disruption.

Steals do not account for every defensive stop, and the supplied figures do not establish that all steals directly produced fast-break points. Nevertheless, the difference shows that Houston created more opportunities to take the ball away.

Cleveland also recorded five blocks, one more than Houston’s four. Dean Wade, Lonzo Ball, and Craig Porter Jr. each recorded two blocks for the Cavaliers, according to the supplied data.

These defensive numbers show why a single category cannot explain the result. Cleveland had more blocks and fewer turnovers, but Houston’s rebounding, steals, and scoring efficiency gave it the stronger overall performance.

Houston Rockets Player Stats

The Rockets’ win featured contributions from multiple players. Sengun led the scoring and playmaking figures provided, while Kevin Durant, Jabari Smith Jr., Amen Thompson, and Reed Sheppard also reached double figures.

Houston’s Leading Scorers

Player	Points	Statistical contribution
Alperen Sengun	28	Team scoring leader
Kevin Durant	20	Second-highest listed scorer
Jabari Smith Jr.	14	Additional scoring support
Amen Thompson	12	Scoring and defensive pressure
Reed Sheppard	12	Double-digit scoring contribution

The supplied data does not include complete individual box-score lines for every player. Unprovided rebounds, assists, shooting splits, minutes, and plus-minus figures are not estimated.

Alperen Sengun: Houston’s Leading Performer

Sengun finished with 28 points, 11 rebounds, and seven assists in the supplied player statistics. His performance combined scoring, rebounding, and playmaking rather than relying on one category.

His 28 points made him the leading scorer for either team. His 11 rebounds also tied him with Steven Adams for Houston’s team lead in that category.

The seven assists were equally relevant. Sengun’s ability to contribute as a scorer and facilitator gave Houston another way to create offense. A player who can finish possessions and help teammates score can influence a game even when the defense concentrates on limiting his individual shots.

Sengun’s statistical profile was especially valuable in a game where Houston won the rebounding battle by 12. His contribution to the team’s interior presence complemented the work of the other Rockets.

Kevin Durant: An Important Scoring Option

Durant scored 20 points, making him Houston’s second-highest scorer among the players listed.

His contribution gave the Rockets another established scoring option alongside Sengun. When more than one player can produce points consistently, the opposing defense faces a more complicated challenge.

Durant’s 20 points also meant Houston received meaningful support beyond its leading scorer. That balance helped the Rockets finish with 114 points despite Cleveland’s strong third quarter.

The supplied data does not provide Durant’s individual shooting percentages, rebounds, or assists for this game. Therefore, his performance is best evaluated through his confirmed scoring total rather than unsupported claims about his efficiency.

Jabari Smith Jr.: Supporting the Offensive Balance

Smith recorded 14 points. Although his total was below those of Sengun and Durant, it added another meaningful contribution to Houston’s scoring.

Teams that distribute scoring across several players can remain productive when the opposition focuses defensive attention on one primary option. Smith’s 14 points formed part of a group effort that also included double-digit contributions from Thompson and Sheppard.

The Rockets did not depend entirely on one player to produce their final total. That distribution was important in a game where Cleveland mounted a serious comeback after halftime.

Amen Thompson: Scoring and Defensive Impact

Thompson recorded 12 points, six assists, and five steals in the supplied data.

His five steals were particularly notable because they represented more than half of Houston’s nine steals. That defensive activity helped distinguish his statistical contribution from a conventional scoring-only performance.

Thompson also ranked second among Houston’s listed assist leaders, behind Sengun’s seven. His combination of assists and steals shows how a player can contribute through ball movement and defense alongside scoring.

The available numbers do not establish exactly how many points followed his steals. Still, his five-steal performance was one of the most distinctive individual statistics in the game.

Reed Sheppard: Additional Scoring Support

Sheppard finished with 12 points. His contribution helped Houston place five players at 12 points or higher in the supplied scoring summary.

Sheppard also recorded one block, according to the provided data. This adds a defensive element to his statistical profile, although the available information does not establish his complete defensive performance.

His double-digit scoring mattered within the broader team effort. Houston had enough scoring support to respond when Cleveland cut the deficit in the third quarter.

Steven Adams: Rebounding Strength

Adams collected 11 rebounds, tying Sengun for the Rockets’ highest individual rebound total.

His contribution was especially relevant because Houston finished with 51 total rebounds and 16 offensive rebounds. Adams’ rebounding helped provide a strong presence around the basket, although the available figures do not specify how many of his rebounds were offensive or defensive.

He also recorded one block in the supplied statistics. The combination of 11 rebounds and a block shows a measurable defensive and interior contribution beyond scoring.

Houston’s Other Listed Players

Houston’s listed starters were Kevin Durant, Jabari Smith Jr., Steven Adams, Alperen Sengun, and Amen Thompson.

The supplied bench list included Jae’Sean Tate, Clint Capela, Aaron Holiday, Josh Okogie, and Reed Sheppard, alongside Jeff Green and JD Davison. The source marked Green and Davison as did not play by coach’s decision.

The data provided here does not include complete individual statistics for every bench player. Their minutes, shooting performance, and exact influence on specific scoring runs should not be inferred from the final team score.

Cleveland Cavaliers Player Stats

Cleveland received its largest listed scoring contribution from De’Andre Hunter. Donovan Mitchell and Evan Mobley also reached double figures, while Nae’Qwan Tomlin added 10 points.

Cleveland’s Leading Scorers

Player	Points	Statistical contribution
De’Andre Hunter	25	Cleveland’s leading scorer
Donovan Mitchell	21	Second-highest listed scorer
Evan Mobley	18	Additional scoring support
Nae’Qwan Tomlin	10	Reached double figures

These four players accounted for 74 of Cleveland’s 104 points. The remaining 30 points came from other Cavaliers, based on the supplied scoring totals.

De’Andre Hunter: Cleveland’s Top Scorer

Hunter scored 25 points, finishing three points behind Houston’s Sengun for the highest individual scoring total in the game.

His scoring was a major part of Cleveland’s offensive production. He led the Cavaliers despite the team’s defeat and helped provide the scoring needed for its third-quarter comeback.

However, Hunter’s total could not erase Houston’s advantage in rebounding and free-throw accuracy. Basketball outcomes depend on more than the highest scorer’s points, particularly when the opposing team creates additional possessions.

The supplied statistics do not include Hunter’s field-goal attempts, three-point makes, free throws, or minutes played. It would therefore be inaccurate to assign him a specific shooting percentage or claim that his points came primarily from a particular area of the court.

Donovan Mitchell: A Strong Scoring Contribution

Mitchell finished with 21 points and two steals.

His scoring placed him second among Cleveland’s listed players. His two steals also made him the team’s leading player in that category within the supplied summary.

Mitchell’s contribution was important because Cleveland needed consistent offense to recover from its 17-point halftime deficit. The Cavaliers eventually outscored Houston by 13 points in the third quarter, but their early disadvantage remained difficult to overcome.

The provided data does not include Mitchell’s complete shooting line or assist total. His performance should therefore be described using the confirmed points and steals rather than assumptions about his efficiency or playmaking.

Evan Mobley: An Additional Offensive Contributor

Mobley scored 18 points, giving Cleveland another substantial scoring contribution behind Hunter and Mitchell.

His total helped the Cavaliers reach 104 points overall. The team was capable of producing offense, especially during the third quarter, when it scored 30 points.

However, Cleveland’s overall field-goal percentage was 44%, and its free-throw percentage was 63%. The available team totals show that scoring opportunities were not converted as efficiently as Houston’s.

Mobley’s individual shooting figures were not included in the supplied data. No conclusion about his personal efficiency can be made from his point total alone.

Nae’Qwan Tomlin: Double-Digit Scoring

Tomlin recorded 10 points, rounding out the four Cleveland players identified as double-digit scorers in the supplied summary.

His contribution supported the team’s overall scoring effort. Cleveland needed contributions from more than Mitchell and Hunter to challenge Houston, and Tomlin’s total added to that effort.

The available information does not establish his full shooting line, rebound total, assists, or playing time. His role can be assessed accurately only within the limits of the confirmed figures.

Cleveland’s Rebounding Leaders

Three Cavaliers tied for the team’s highest individual rebound total:

Player	Rebounds
Jarrett Allen	7
Dean Wade	7
Craig Porter Jr.	7

Each player collected seven rebounds. Together, these performances show that Cleveland had several players contributing on the glass.

However, Houston’s team total was still much higher. The Rockets finished with 51 rebounds, compared with Cleveland’s 39. The Cavaliers’ shared individual lead did not translate into an overall rebounding advantage.

Craig Porter Jr.: Cleveland’s Assist Leader

Porter recorded five assists and seven rebounds, according to the supplied figures.

His five assists led Cleveland’s listed players in that category. Combined with his rebounding total, this showed contributions in two different areas of the game.

Cleveland needed effective ball movement during its third-quarter run. Porter’s assist total was part of the team’s playmaking effort, although the supplied figures do not identify which specific baskets came from his passes.

Cleveland’s Defensive Contributors

Dean Wade, Lonzo Ball, and Craig Porter Jr. each recorded two blocks. Together, these players accounted for six blocks in the supplied individual summary, which exceeds the team total of five.

That discrepancy is important. The supplied figures contain an internal inconsistency between the listed player block leaders and Cleveland’s total team blocks. The team total should not be silently changed, and the individual figures should be checked against the original box score before publication as definitive statistics.

The Cavaliers recorded five blocks in the team summary, one more than Houston’s four. Even with that defensive contribution, Houston’s rebounding and steals advantages remained significant.

Cleveland’s listed bench also included Thomas Bryant, Lonzo Ball, Craig Porter Jr., Dean Wade, Tyrese Proctor, Larry Nance Jr., and Luke Travers. The supplied source marked Nance and Travers as did not play by coach’s decision.

Key Factors Behind Houston’s 114-104 Victory

The final score reflected several differences in execution. Houston did not dominate every category, but its advantages in rebounding, free throws, and steals helped it maintain control.

1. Houston Created More Second-Chance Opportunities

Houston’s 16 offensive rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 10 were a major statistical difference. Each offensive rebound gave the Rockets another chance to score after a missed shot.

These extra possessions can be particularly valuable in close games or when an opponent is trying to reduce a deficit. They also place pressure on defenders, who must secure rebounds before they can start their own offense.

Houston’s 51 total rebounds reinforced this advantage. Cleveland’s 39 rebounds meant the Cavaliers were less successful at controlling the glass over the entire game.

2. Free-Throw Shooting Favored the Rockets

Houston made 85% of its free throws, while Cleveland converted 63%.

The Cavaliers’ 20 successful attempts were fewer than Houston’s 23, even though Cleveland attempted five additional free throws. This was a meaningful difference in a game decided by 10 points.

Free throws are often among the easiest scoring opportunities to measure because the shooter attempts an uncontested shot from the line. However, the ability to convert those attempts still varies by player and team.

In this matchup, Houston took better advantage of its opportunities.

3. Cleveland’s Three-Point Volume Was Not Enough

Cleveland made 12 three-pointers, three more than Houston. Yet the Cavaliers lost by 10 points.

The explanation lies partly in efficiency. Cleveland attempted 39 three-pointers and made 31%, while Houston converted 38% of its 24 attempts.

The Cavaliers’ approach generated some valuable scoring, but the extra three-point makes did not compensate for Houston’s other advantages.

A useful lesson from this game is that three-point volume should be evaluated alongside accuracy, rebounding, free throws, and total field-goal production. No single statistic tells the full story.

4. Amen Thompson Disrupted Cleveland’s Possessions

Thompson recorded five steals, while Houston finished with nine as a team. Cleveland recorded four steals.

Steals can disrupt offensive rhythm, force players to restart possessions, and create opportunities for transition scoring. They are especially useful indicators when combined with the overall game context.

The supplied figures do not establish how many of Houston’s points came directly from turnovers. Still, the Rockets’ five-steal advantage over Cleveland shows that they were more successful at taking the ball away.

5. Houston Responded at the Right Time

Cleveland won the third quarter 30-17 and reduced Houston’s halftime lead from 17 points to four.

A comeback of that size can change the pressure surrounding a game. The leading team must find a way to score again, while the trailing team needs to sustain its improved performance.

Houston answered by scoring 40 points in the fourth quarter. Cleveland managed 34, which was a strong offensive total but not enough to complete the comeback.

The final quarter therefore provides important context for the result. Houston’s victory was not simply the product of its early lead; the Rockets also produced their highest-scoring period when Cleveland was within striking distance.

Tactical Analysis: What the Numbers Reveal

The cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats offer a useful example of how multiple small advantages can combine into a decisive result.

Houston’s Offensive Approach

Houston finished with 114 points on 41 made field goals, nine made three-pointers, and 23 made free throws.

The team also recorded 23 assists, suggesting that passing contributed to its offense. Sengun’s seven assists and Thompson’s six provided two identifiable sources of playmaking.

The Rockets’ 51 rebounds were equally important. More rebounds can create more opportunities to attack, especially when offensive rebounds allow a team to retain possession after a missed shot.

Although the supplied data does not include a complete possession-by-possession breakdown, the team totals support a clear conclusion: Houston combined scoring efficiency with strong rebounding and defensive activity.

Cleveland’s Offensive Approach

Cleveland scored 104 points and made 12 three-pointers. Its 36 made field goals and 20 made free throws also demonstrate that the team produced offense across multiple scoring methods.

The challenge was consistency. Cleveland shot 44% from the field and 31% from three-point range. Its 63% free-throw percentage left additional points unclaimed.

The Cavaliers’ third-quarter performance showed that they could increase their offensive output. However, they could not sustain a large enough advantage across the full game to overcome the opening deficit.

Why the Rebounding Gap Matters

A 12-rebound difference should not automatically be interpreted as 12 additional possessions. Team rebounds, missed shots, and possession-ending events complicate that relationship.

Nevertheless, the six-rebound advantage on the offensive glass is a meaningful indicator of Houston’s ability to recover missed shots. Those extra chances can change the flow of a game even when the opposing team shoots a respectable percentage.

For Cleveland, improving defensive rebounding would have been one potential way to limit Houston’s additional opportunities.

What the Final Score Does Not Tell Us

A final score cannot explain every tactical decision. The supplied figures do not include player minutes, complete individual shooting splits, lineup combinations, or a full play-by-play analysis.

Those details would be needed to determine which lineups performed best, when individual players scored, and how specific substitutions affected the result.

For readers who want to verify the official figures, the ESPN box score for the Rockets-Cavaliers game is the most relevant reference for checking individual and team statistics.

Season-Series Context

The supplied game information records Houston’s November 20 victory as the first meeting between the teams during the 2025-26 season. It also lists a second meeting on December 28, 2025, when Houston won 117-100 at home.

According to those supplied results, Houston won both listed meetings:

Meeting	Venue	Result
November 20, 2025	Rocket Arena, Cleveland	Houston 114, Cleveland 104
December 28, 2025	Houston	Houston 117, Cleveland 100

The second result is included as season-series context, not as part of the November 20 box score.

Across the two listed games, Houston scored 231 points and Cleveland scored 204, a combined margin of 27 points in Houston’s favor. This calculation describes only those two meetings and should not be treated as a summary of the teams’ entire season.

The first matchup is especially useful for examining how Houston combined efficient shooting, rebounding, and defensive disruption. The second result suggests that Houston also won the later meeting, although a separate box score would be necessary to compare individual performances across both games.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Cleveland Cavaliers vs Houston Rockets game on November 20, 2025?

The Houston Rockets defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 114-104 at Rocket Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. Houston built an early lead and scored 40 points in the fourth quarter to secure the victory.

2. Who was the leading scorer in the game?

Alperen Sengun led all listed scorers with 28 points for Houston. De’Andre Hunter was Cleveland’s leading scorer with 25 points, followed by Donovan Mitchell with 21.

3. How many rebounds did Houston and Cleveland record?

Houston recorded 51 total rebounds, while Cleveland finished with 39. The Rockets also collected 16 offensive rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 10.

4. Which team shot better from three-point range?

Houston shot 38% from three-point range, making nine of 24 attempts. Cleveland made 12 of 39 attempts at a 31% success rate. Cleveland made more three-pointers, but Houston shot more accurately.

5. Which player recorded the most assists?

Alperen Sengun led the Houston Rockets with seven assists. Amen Thompson added six assists, while Craig Porter Jr. led Cleveland with five.

6. What was the most important statistical difference in the game?

Houston’s 12-rebound advantage, higher free-throw percentage, and five additional steals were important differences. Cleveland won the third quarter but could not overcome its first-half deficit.

Conclusion

The November 20, 2025, matchup between the Houston Rockets and Cleveland Cavaliers demonstrated how efficient scoring, rebounding, and defensive pressure can determine an NBA result. Houston won 114-104 after building a strong first-half lead and responding effectively to Cleveland’s third-quarter comeback.

Alperen Sengun led the Rockets with 28 points, 11 rebounds, and seven assists. De’Andre Hunter paced Cleveland with 25 points, while Donovan Mitchell added 21. Houston’s 51 rebounds, 85% free-throw shooting, and nine steals helped offset Cleveland’s advantage in made three-pointers.

The quarter-by-quarter breakdown also highlights the importance of finishing games. Cleveland outscored Houston 30-17 in the third quarter, but Houston answered with 40 points in the fourth. The Rockets’ ability to recover their offensive rhythm proved decisive.

Overall, the cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats show why basketball analysis requires more than looking at the final score or leading scorer. Shooting accuracy, second-chance opportunities, free-throw conversion, and defensive activity all contributed to Houston’s victory.

Meta Description

cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats: Explore key scorers, team totals, quarter scores, and Houston’s 114-104 win.

SEO Suggestions

• SEO title: Cavaliers vs Rockets Match Player Stats
• Suggested URL slug: cleveland-cavaliers-vs-houston-rockets-match-player-stats
• Suggested category: Sports / NBA Match Player Stats
• Schema markup: Use Article schema and FAQPage schema where appropriate. Ensure the structured data accurately reflects the visible article and follows current Google guidelines.

Cleveland Cavaliers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats: Full Box Score and Analysis

The cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats from November 20, 2025, show how Houston secured a 114-104 road victory at Rocket Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. Alperen Sengun led the Rockets with 28 points, while De’Andre Hunter scored 25 points for the Cavaliers. Houston controlled the opening half, survived Cleveland’s third-quarter response, and scored 40 points in the fourth quarter to protect its lead. The game also highlighted Houston’s advantage in rebounding, interior scoring opportunities, and defensive pressure. Cleveland made 12 three-pointers but struggled at the free-throw line, converting only 20 of 32 attempts. These numbers explain the final result more clearly than the score alone.

Cleveland Cavaliers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup featured two competitive teams with winning records at the time. Houston entered the game with a 10-3 record, while Cleveland stood at 10-6. Playing away from home, the Rockets delivered a balanced performance that combined efficient scoring, offensive rebounding, and timely defense.

Houston Rockets

Away team

114

Record: 10-3

FINAL

10-point margin

Cleveland Cavaliers

Home team

104

Record: 10-6

Date

November 20, 2025

Venue

Rocket Arena

Location

Cleveland, Ohio

Attendance

19,432

The Rockets won three of the four quarters. Cleveland’s best period came in the third, when it outscored Houston 30-17. However, Houston’s 16-point advantage in the opening quarter and its strong fourth-quarter finish proved decisive.

The supplied ESPN box score is the basis for the statistics and player figures discussed below.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown

The scoring pattern explains how Houston built its lead and responded when Cleveland threatened to make the game closer.

Quarter	Houston Rockets	Cleveland Cavaliers	Quarter Winner
First quarter	33	19	Houston
Second quarter	24	21	Houston
Third quarter	17	30	Cleveland
Fourth quarter	40	34	Houston
Final score	114	104	Houston

First Quarter: Houston Establishes Control

Houston opened with 33 points, while Cleveland managed only 19. That 14-point difference gave the Rockets an early advantage and forced the Cavaliers to spend much of the game trying to catch up.

A strong opening quarter can shape an entire NBA game. It gives the leading team more freedom to manage possessions and puts pressure on the opponent to improve its shot selection.

Second Quarter: Rockets Maintain Their Lead

Houston added another 24 points in the second quarter, compared with Cleveland’s 21. The Rockets entered halftime with a 57-40 lead.

Cleveland did not allow the gap to grow dramatically in this period, but it also failed to recover enough ground. Houston’s ability to maintain its advantage meant the Cavaliers needed a significant second-half response.

Third Quarter: Cleveland Finds Its Rhythm

The Cavaliers produced their strongest stretch after halftime, scoring 30 points against Houston’s 17. Cleveland reduced the deficit from 17 points at halftime to just four points entering the final quarter.

This was the game’s most important shift in momentum. Cleveland showed it could create more effective scoring possessions and put Houston under pressure. However, the third-quarter comeback did not erase the Rockets’ earlier advantage.

Fourth Quarter: Houston Closes the Game

Houston scored 40 points in the fourth quarter, its highest-scoring period of the night. Cleveland also performed well offensively with 34 points, but the Rockets still won the quarter by six.

The final period demonstrated Houston’s ability to answer pressure with scoring rather than simply trying to defend its lead. The Rockets finished with a 10-point victory.

Complete Team Statistics Comparison

The team totals reveal why Houston won despite Cleveland making more three-pointers. The Rockets collected 12 more rebounds, converted free throws at a much higher rate, and recorded five more steals.

Team statistic	Houston Rockets	Cleveland Cavaliers
Points	114	104
Field goals	41/90	36/81
Field goal percentage	46%	44%
Three-pointers	9/24	12/39
Three-point percentage	38%	31%
Free throws	23/27	20/32
Free-throw percentage	85%	63%
Total rebounds	51	39
Offensive rebounds	16	10
Defensive rebounds	35	29
Assists	23	20
Turnovers	13	12
Steals	9	4
Blocks	4	5
Personal fouls	23	18

Percentages are reported as supplied in the game data. Minor differences can occur when displayed percentages are rounded.

Field Goal Efficiency

Houston made 41 of its 90 field-goal attempts, while Cleveland converted 36 of 81. The Rockets therefore made five more shots from the field.

Houston’s 46% shooting rate was slightly better than Cleveland’s 44%. That difference alone does not explain the entire result, but it helped Houston turn its offensive possessions into points.

Cleveland actually attempted nine fewer field goals. This makes shot selection and possession outcomes especially important when evaluating the game.

Three-Point Shooting

Cleveland made 12 three-pointers compared with Houston’s nine. That gave the Cavaliers a three-point advantage in made shots from beyond the arc.

However, Cleveland attempted 39 three-pointers and converted only 31%. Houston attempted 24 and made 38%.

The distinction is important because the number of successful three-pointers does not tell the whole story. Cleveland took 15 more attempts from long range, yet the Rockets’ higher accuracy helped offset the Cavaliers’ additional makes.

Cleveland’s three-point shooting was not entirely ineffective. The team still scored 36 points from beyond the arc. The problem was that its long-range production did not compensate for the other differences in the game.

Free-Throw Accuracy: A Major Difference

Houston converted 23 of 27 free throws, an 85% success rate. Cleveland made 20 of 32, or 63%.

The Cavaliers attempted five more free throws than Houston but converted only three fewer. Their missed attempts represented a substantial lost scoring opportunity.

Houston’s free-throw advantage was approximately 13 percentage points. The Rockets also scored three more points at the line, despite attempting fewer shots.

This is one of the clearest statistical differences in the matchup. Cleveland’s missed free throws mattered because the team was already trying to overcome a first-half deficit.

Rebounding: Houston Controls More Possessions

Houston collected 51 rebounds, compared with Cleveland’s 39. The Rockets won the overall rebounding battle by 12.

The offensive rebounding figures were particularly revealing:

• Houston: 16 offensive rebounds.
• Cleveland: 10 offensive rebounds.
• Houston’s advantage: six offensive rebounds.

Offensive rebounds can extend possessions after missed shots. They may create second-chance points, force additional defensive rotations, and prevent an opponent from securing the ball cleanly.

Houston also recorded 35 defensive rebounds, six more than Cleveland’s 29. The Rockets therefore had an advantage on both ends of the glass.

Cleveland’s 39 total rebounds were not necessarily poor in isolation. The concern was the difference between the teams and the additional opportunities Houston could generate from its misses.

Assists and Ball Movement

Houston recorded 23 assists, while Cleveland finished with 20.

The three-assist difference suggests a modest advantage in assisted scoring, although assists alone cannot show the full quality of a team’s offense. Some successful possessions involve individual creation, while others depend on screens, cuts, and quick passing.

Alperen Sengun recorded seven assists for Houston, leading the game among the players identified in the supplied statistics. Amen Thompson added six.

For Cleveland, Craig Porter Jr. led with five assists. These figures indicate that Houston had two major contributors to its recorded playmaking, while Porter was the leading facilitator identified for the Cavaliers.

Turnovers and Defensive Pressure

Cleveland committed 12 turnovers, one fewer than Houston’s 13. The Cavaliers therefore had a small advantage in protecting possession.

However, the Rockets recorded nine steals, compared with Cleveland’s four. Amen Thompson led Houston with five steals by himself, giving him a major role in the team’s defensive disruption.

Steals do not account for every defensive stop, and the supplied figures do not establish that all steals directly produced fast-break points. Nevertheless, the difference shows that Houston created more opportunities to take the ball away.

Cleveland also recorded five blocks, one more than Houston’s four. Dean Wade, Lonzo Ball, and Craig Porter Jr. each recorded two blocks for the Cavaliers, according to the supplied data.

These defensive numbers show why a single category cannot explain the result. Cleveland had more blocks and fewer turnovers, but Houston’s rebounding, steals, and scoring efficiency gave it the stronger overall performance.

Houston Rockets Player Stats

The Rockets’ win featured contributions from multiple players. Sengun led the scoring and playmaking figures provided, while Kevin Durant, Jabari Smith Jr., Amen Thompson, and Reed Sheppard also reached double figures.

Houston’s Leading Scorers

Player	Points	Statistical contribution
Alperen Sengun	28	Team scoring leader
Kevin Durant	20	Second-highest listed scorer
Jabari Smith Jr.	14	Additional scoring support
Amen Thompson	12	Scoring and defensive pressure
Reed Sheppard	12	Double-digit scoring contribution

The supplied data does not include complete individual box-score lines for every player. Unprovided rebounds, assists, shooting splits, minutes, and plus-minus figures are not estimated.

Alperen Sengun: Houston’s Leading Performer

Sengun finished with 28 points, 11 rebounds, and seven assists in the supplied player statistics. His performance combined scoring, rebounding, and playmaking rather than relying on one category.

His 28 points made him the leading scorer for either team. His 11 rebounds also tied him with Steven Adams for Houston’s team lead in that category.

The seven assists were equally relevant. Sengun’s ability to contribute as a scorer and facilitator gave Houston another way to create offense. A player who can finish possessions and help teammates score can influence a game even when the defense concentrates on limiting his individual shots.

Sengun’s statistical profile was especially valuable in a game where Houston won the rebounding battle by 12. His contribution to the team’s interior presence complemented the work of the other Rockets.

Kevin Durant: An Important Scoring Option

Durant scored 20 points, making him Houston’s second-highest scorer among the players listed.

His contribution gave the Rockets another established scoring option alongside Sengun. When more than one player can produce points consistently, the opposing defense faces a more complicated challenge.

Durant’s 20 points also meant Houston received meaningful support beyond its leading scorer. That balance helped the Rockets finish with 114 points despite Cleveland’s strong third quarter.

The supplied data does not provide Durant’s individual shooting percentages, rebounds, or assists for this game. Therefore, his performance is best evaluated through his confirmed scoring total rather than unsupported claims about his efficiency.

Jabari Smith Jr.: Supporting the Offensive Balance

Smith recorded 14 points. Although his total was below those of Sengun and Durant, it added another meaningful contribution to Houston’s scoring.

Teams that distribute scoring across several players can remain productive when the opposition focuses defensive attention on one primary option. Smith’s 14 points formed part of a group effort that also included double-digit contributions from Thompson and Sheppard.

The Rockets did not depend entirely on one player to produce their final total. That distribution was important in a game where Cleveland mounted a serious comeback after halftime.

Amen Thompson: Scoring and Defensive Impact

Thompson recorded 12 points, six assists, and five steals in the supplied data.

His five steals were particularly notable because they represented more than half of Houston’s nine steals. That defensive activity helped distinguish his statistical contribution from a conventional scoring-only performance.

Thompson also ranked second among Houston’s listed assist leaders, behind Sengun’s seven. His combination of assists and steals shows how a player can contribute through ball movement and defense alongside scoring.

The available numbers do not establish exactly how many points followed his steals. Still, his five-steal performance was one of the most distinctive individual statistics in the game.

Reed Sheppard: Additional Scoring Support

Sheppard finished with 12 points. His contribution helped Houston place five players at 12 points or higher in the supplied scoring summary.

Sheppard also recorded one block, according to the provided data. This adds a defensive element to his statistical profile, although the available information does not establish his complete defensive performance.

His double-digit scoring mattered within the broader team effort. Houston had enough scoring support to respond when Cleveland cut the deficit in the third quarter.

Steven Adams: Rebounding Strength

Adams collected 11 rebounds, tying Sengun for the Rockets’ highest individual rebound total.

His contribution was especially relevant because Houston finished with 51 total rebounds and 16 offensive rebounds. Adams’ rebounding helped provide a strong presence around the basket, although the available figures do not specify how many of his rebounds were offensive or defensive.

He also recorded one block in the supplied statistics. The combination of 11 rebounds and a block shows a measurable defensive and interior contribution beyond scoring.

Houston’s Other Listed Players

Houston’s listed starters were Kevin Durant, Jabari Smith Jr., Steven Adams, Alperen Sengun, and Amen Thompson.

The supplied bench list included Jae’Sean Tate, Clint Capela, Aaron Holiday, Josh Okogie, and Reed Sheppard, alongside Jeff Green and JD Davison. The source marked Green and Davison as did not play by coach’s decision.

The data provided here does not include complete individual statistics for every bench player. Their minutes, shooting performance, and exact influence on specific scoring runs should not be inferred from the final team score.

Cleveland Cavaliers Player Stats

Cleveland received its largest listed scoring contribution from De’Andre Hunter. Donovan Mitchell and Evan Mobley also reached double figures, while Nae’Qwan Tomlin added 10 points.

Cleveland’s Leading Scorers

Player	Points	Statistical contribution
De’Andre Hunter	25	Cleveland’s leading scorer
Donovan Mitchell	21	Second-highest listed scorer
Evan Mobley	18	Additional scoring support
Nae’Qwan Tomlin	10	Reached double figures

These four players accounted for 74 of Cleveland’s 104 points. The remaining 30 points came from other Cavaliers, based on the supplied scoring totals.

De’Andre Hunter: Cleveland’s Top Scorer

Hunter scored 25 points, finishing three points behind Houston’s Sengun for the highest individual scoring total in the game.

His scoring was a major part of Cleveland’s offensive production. He led the Cavaliers despite the team’s defeat and helped provide the scoring needed for its third-quarter comeback.

However, Hunter’s total could not erase Houston’s advantage in rebounding and free-throw accuracy. Basketball outcomes depend on more than the highest scorer’s points, particularly when the opposing team creates additional possessions.

The supplied statistics do not include Hunter’s field-goal attempts, three-point makes, free throws, or minutes played. It would therefore be inaccurate to assign him a specific shooting percentage or claim that his points came primarily from a particular area of the court.

Donovan Mitchell: A Strong Scoring Contribution

Mitchell finished with 21 points and two steals.

His scoring placed him second among Cleveland’s listed players. His two steals also made him the team’s leading player in that category within the supplied summary.

Mitchell’s contribution was important because Cleveland needed consistent offense to recover from its 17-point halftime deficit. The Cavaliers eventually outscored Houston by 13 points in the third quarter, but their early disadvantage remained difficult to overcome.

The provided data does not include Mitchell’s complete shooting line or assist total. His performance should therefore be described using the confirmed points and steals rather than assumptions about his efficiency or playmaking.

Evan Mobley: An Additional Offensive Contributor

Mobley scored 18 points, giving Cleveland another substantial scoring contribution behind Hunter and Mitchell.

His total helped the Cavaliers reach 104 points overall. The team was capable of producing offense, especially during the third quarter, when it scored 30 points.

However, Cleveland’s overall field-goal percentage was 44%, and its free-throw percentage was 63%. The available team totals show that scoring opportunities were not converted as efficiently as Houston’s.

Mobley’s individual shooting figures were not included in the supplied data. No conclusion about his personal efficiency can be made from his point total alone.

Nae’Qwan Tomlin: Double-Digit Scoring

Tomlin recorded 10 points, rounding out the four Cleveland players identified as double-digit scorers in the supplied summary.

His contribution supported the team’s overall scoring effort. Cleveland needed contributions from more than Mitchell and Hunter to challenge Houston, and Tomlin’s total added to that effort.

The available information does not establish his full shooting line, rebound total, assists, or playing time. His role can be assessed accurately only within the limits of the confirmed figures.

Cleveland’s Rebounding Leaders

Three Cavaliers tied for the team’s highest individual rebound total:

Player	Rebounds
Jarrett Allen	7
Dean Wade	7
Craig Porter Jr.	7

Each player collected seven rebounds. Together, these performances show that Cleveland had several players contributing on the glass.

However, Houston’s team total was still much higher. The Rockets finished with 51 rebounds, compared with Cleveland’s 39. The Cavaliers’ shared individual lead did not translate into an overall rebounding advantage.

Craig Porter Jr.: Cleveland’s Assist Leader

Porter recorded five assists and seven rebounds, according to the supplied figures.

His five assists led Cleveland’s listed players in that category. Combined with his rebounding total, this showed contributions in two different areas of the game.

Cleveland needed effective ball movement during its third-quarter run. Porter’s assist total was part of the team’s playmaking effort, although the supplied figures do not identify which specific baskets came from his passes.

Cleveland’s Defensive Contributors

Dean Wade, Lonzo Ball, and Craig Porter Jr. each recorded two blocks. Together, these players accounted for six blocks in the supplied individual summary, which exceeds the team total of five.

That discrepancy is important. The supplied figures contain an internal inconsistency between the listed player block leaders and Cleveland’s total team blocks. The team total should not be silently changed, and the individual figures should be checked against the original box score before publication as definitive statistics.

The Cavaliers recorded five blocks in the team summary, one more than Houston’s four. Even with that defensive contribution, Houston’s rebounding and steals advantages remained significant.

Cleveland’s listed bench also included Thomas Bryant, Lonzo Ball, Craig Porter Jr., Dean Wade, Tyrese Proctor, Larry Nance Jr., and Luke Travers. The supplied source marked Nance and Travers as did not play by coach’s decision.

Key Factors Behind Houston’s 114-104 Victory

The final score reflected several differences in execution. Houston did not dominate every category, but its advantages in rebounding, free throws, and steals helped it maintain control.

1. Houston Created More Second-Chance Opportunities

Houston’s 16 offensive rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 10 were a major statistical difference. Each offensive rebound gave the Rockets another chance to score after a missed shot.

These extra possessions can be particularly valuable in close games or when an opponent is trying to reduce a deficit. They also place pressure on defenders, who must secure rebounds before they can start their own offense.

Houston’s 51 total rebounds reinforced this advantage. Cleveland’s 39 rebounds meant the Cavaliers were less successful at controlling the glass over the entire game.

2. Free-Throw Shooting Favored the Rockets

Houston made 85% of its free throws, while Cleveland converted 63%.

The Cavaliers’ 20 successful attempts were fewer than Houston’s 23, even though Cleveland attempted five additional free throws. This was a meaningful difference in a game decided by 10 points.

Free throws are often among the easiest scoring opportunities to measure because the shooter attempts an uncontested shot from the line. However, the ability to convert those attempts still varies by player and team.

In this matchup, Houston took better advantage of its opportunities.

3. Cleveland’s Three-Point Volume Was Not Enough

Cleveland made 12 three-pointers, three more than Houston. Yet the Cavaliers lost by 10 points.

The explanation lies partly in efficiency. Cleveland attempted 39 three-pointers and made 31%, while Houston converted 38% of its 24 attempts.

The Cavaliers’ approach generated some valuable scoring, but the extra three-point makes did not compensate for Houston’s other advantages.

A useful lesson from this game is that three-point volume should be evaluated alongside accuracy, rebounding, free throws, and total field-goal production. No single statistic tells the full story.

4. Amen Thompson Disrupted Cleveland’s Possessions

Thompson recorded five steals, while Houston finished with nine as a team. Cleveland recorded four steals.

Steals can disrupt offensive rhythm, force players to restart possessions, and create opportunities for transition scoring. They are especially useful indicators when combined with the overall game context.

The supplied figures do not establish how many of Houston’s points came directly from turnovers. Still, the Rockets’ five-steal advantage over Cleveland shows that they were more successful at taking the ball away.

5. Houston Responded at the Right Time

Cleveland won the third quarter 30-17 and reduced Houston’s halftime lead from 17 points to four.

A comeback of that size can change the pressure surrounding a game. The leading team must find a way to score again, while the trailing team needs to sustain its improved performance.

Houston answered by scoring 40 points in the fourth quarter. Cleveland managed 34, which was a strong offensive total but not enough to complete the comeback.

The final quarter therefore provides important context for the result. Houston’s victory was not simply the product of its early lead; the Rockets also produced their highest-scoring period when Cleveland was within striking distance.

Tactical Analysis: What the Numbers Reveal

The cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats offer a useful example of how multiple small advantages can combine into a decisive result.

Houston’s Offensive Approach

Houston finished with 114 points on 41 made field goals, nine made three-pointers, and 23 made free throws.

The team also recorded 23 assists, suggesting that passing contributed to its offense. Sengun’s seven assists and Thompson’s six provided two identifiable sources of playmaking.

The Rockets’ 51 rebounds were equally important. More rebounds can create more opportunities to attack, especially when offensive rebounds allow a team to retain possession after a missed shot.

Although the supplied data does not include a complete possession-by-possession breakdown, the team totals support a clear conclusion: Houston combined scoring efficiency with strong rebounding and defensive activity.

Cleveland’s Offensive Approach

Cleveland scored 104 points and made 12 three-pointers. Its 36 made field goals and 20 made free throws also demonstrate that the team produced offense across multiple scoring methods.

The challenge was consistency. Cleveland shot 44% from the field and 31% from three-point range. Its 63% free-throw percentage left additional points unclaimed.

The Cavaliers’ third-quarter performance showed that they could increase their offensive output. However, they could not sustain a large enough advantage across the full game to overcome the opening deficit.

Why the Rebounding Gap Matters

A 12-rebound difference should not automatically be interpreted as 12 additional possessions. Team rebounds, missed shots, and possession-ending events complicate that relationship.

Nevertheless, the six-rebound advantage on the offensive glass is a meaningful indicator of Houston’s ability to recover missed shots. Those extra chances can change the flow of a game even when the opposing team shoots a respectable percentage.

For Cleveland, improving defensive rebounding would have been one potential way to limit Houston’s additional opportunities.

What the Final Score Does Not Tell Us

A final score cannot explain every tactical decision. The supplied figures do not include player minutes, complete individual shooting splits, lineup combinations, or a full play-by-play analysis.

Those details would be needed to determine which lineups performed best, when individual players scored, and how specific substitutions affected the result.

For readers who want to verify the official figures, the ESPN box score for the Rockets-Cavaliers game is the most relevant reference for checking individual and team statistics.

Season-Series Context

The supplied game information records Houston’s November 20 victory as the first meeting between the teams during the 2025-26 season. It also lists a second meeting on December 28, 2025, when Houston won 117-100 at home.

According to those supplied results, Houston won both listed meetings:

Meeting	Venue	Result
November 20, 2025	Rocket Arena, Cleveland	Houston 114, Cleveland 104
December 28, 2025	Houston	Houston 117, Cleveland 100

The second result is included as season-series context, not as part of the November 20 box score.

Across the two listed games, Houston scored 231 points and Cleveland scored 204, a combined margin of 27 points in Houston’s favor. This calculation describes only those two meetings and should not be treated as a summary of the teams’ entire season.

The first matchup is especially useful for examining how Houston combined efficient shooting, rebounding, and defensive disruption. The second result suggests that Houston also won the later meeting, although a separate box score would be necessary to compare individual performances across both games.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Cleveland Cavaliers vs Houston Rockets game on November 20, 2025?

The Houston Rockets defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 114-104 at Rocket Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. Houston built an early lead and scored 40 points in the fourth quarter to secure the victory.

2. Who was the leading scorer in the game?

Alperen Sengun led all listed scorers with 28 points for Houston. De’Andre Hunter was Cleveland’s leading scorer with 25 points, followed by Donovan Mitchell with 21.

3. How many rebounds did Houston and Cleveland record?

Houston recorded 51 total rebounds, while Cleveland finished with 39. The Rockets also collected 16 offensive rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 10.

4. Which team shot better from three-point range?

Houston shot 38% from three-point range, making nine of 24 attempts. Cleveland made 12 of 39 attempts at a 31% success rate. Cleveland made more three-pointers, but Houston shot more accurately.

5. Which player recorded the most assists?

Alperen Sengun led the Houston Rockets with seven assists. Amen Thompson added six assists, while Craig Porter Jr. led Cleveland with five.

6. What was the most important statistical difference in the game?

Houston’s 12-rebound advantage, higher free-throw percentage, and five additional steals were important differences. Cleveland won the third quarter but could not overcome its first-half deficit.

Conclusion

The November 20, 2025, matchup between the Houston Rockets and Cleveland Cavaliers demonstrated how efficient scoring, rebounding, and defensive pressure can determine an NBA result. Houston won 114-104 after building a strong first-half lead and responding effectively to Cleveland’s third-quarter comeback.

Alperen Sengun led the Rockets with 28 points, 11 rebounds, and seven assists. De’Andre Hunter paced Cleveland with 25 points, while Donovan Mitchell added 21. Houston’s 51 rebounds, 85% free-throw shooting, and nine steals helped offset Cleveland’s advantage in made three-pointers.

The quarter-by-quarter breakdown also highlights the importance of finishing games. Cleveland outscored Houston 30-17 in the third quarter, but Houston answered with 40 points in the fourth. The Rockets’ ability to recover their offensive rhythm proved decisive.

Overall, the cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats show why basketball analysis requires more than looking at the final score or leading scorer. Shooting accuracy, second-chance opportunities, free-throw conversion, and defensive activity all contributed to Houston’s victory.