Celtics vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats

The celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats from the Spurs’ 100-95 victory over the Boston Celtics provide a detailed look at how a close game was decided. San Antonio overcame a nine-point Boston lead and finished strongly, with De’Aaron Fox and Victor Wembanyama each scoring 21 points. Keldon Johnson added 18 points and 10 rebounds, while Julian Champagnie produced 13 rebounds. For Boston, Derrick White led all Celtics scorers with 29 points, followed by Jaylen Brown with 27 points. The official NBA scorer’s report lists 19,156 attendees at TD Garden.

The final margin was only five points, but the box score shows several important differences. Both teams finished with 38 made field goals and 22 assists. Boston had the better three-point percentage, but San Antonio created more second-chance opportunities and committed fewer turnovers. Those details help explain why the Spurs were able to win despite shooting only 22.7 percent from three-point range.

This article breaks down the complete player statistics, team numbers, scoring pattern, major moments, and the individual performances that shaped the result.

Celtics vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats: Game Overview

San Antonio defeated Boston 100-95 at TD Garden. The Spurs entered the game with a 27-11 record, while Boston was 24-14. The official scorer’s report records the game at TD Garden in Boston with an attendance of 19,156.

Final Score

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
San Antonio Spurs	21	29	23	27	100
Boston Celtics	26	29	20	20	95

Boston started better and led 26-21 after the opening quarter. Both teams then scored 29 points in the second period, leaving the Celtics ahead 55-50 at halftime.

The game changed after halftime.

San Antonio scored 23 points in the third quarter while Boston managed 20. That reduced the Celtics’ advantage to two points entering the final period.

The Spurs then scored 27 points in the fourth quarter. Boston scored only 20.

That eight-point swing over the second half turned a five-point halftime deficit into a five-point road victory.

San Antonio Spurs Player Statistics

San Antonio received meaningful contributions from several players. Fox and Wembanyama led the team in scoring with 21 points each, while Johnson added 18. Champagnie was especially important on the glass with 13 rebounds. The official box score confirms that San Antonio finished with 53 total rebounds and 22 assists.

De’Aaron Fox

De’Aaron Fox finished with 21 points, nine rebounds, and six assists.

He shot 9-for-16 from the field, giving him a 56.3 percent field-goal rate. He made one of six three-point attempts and converted both of his free throws.

His complete line was:

• 21 points
• 9 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 1 steal
• 2 turnovers
• 9-for-16 field goals
• 1-for-6 three-pointers
• 2-for-2 free throws

Fox’s combination of scoring and playmaking was important because Boston had to account for his ability to attack the basket and create shots.

His six assists were also the most on the Spurs.

Victor Wembanyama

Victor Wembanyama scored 21 points and added six rebounds and three blocks.

He shot 8-for-17 from the field and made one of four three-point attempts. He was also perfect from the free-throw line, going 4-for-4.

His line included:

• 21 points
• 6 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 3 blocks
• 8-for-17 field goals
• 1-for-4 three-pointers
• 4-for-4 free throws

Wembanyama’s biggest impact came after halftime. According to the NBA’s game recap, he scored 16 of his 21 points in the second half and hit a late jumper that helped seal the victory.

That second-half production was particularly important because Boston had defended him effectively early in the game.

Keldon Johnson

Keldon Johnson delivered one of San Antonio’s most efficient all-around performances.

He scored 18 points and collected 10 rebounds for a double-double. He shot 6-for-13 from the field and made two three-pointers.

His statistics were:

• 18 points
• 10 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 1 steal
• 2 turnovers
• 6-for-13 field goals
• 2-for-7 three-pointers
• 4-for-5 free throws

Johnson’s 10 rebounds gave San Antonio another strong presence on the glass.

His three-pointer late in the fourth quarter was also part of the Spurs’ decisive closing sequence. The NBA game recap reports that Johnson’s three put San Antonio ahead 93-91 with 2:14 remaining.

Julian Champagnie

Julian Champagnie did not lead San Antonio in scoring, but his rebounding was highly significant.

He finished with 12 points and 13 rebounds.

His 13 rebounds were the most by any player in the game. He also recorded three assists and one block.

His shooting line was 5-for-12 from the field and 2-for-8 from three-point range.

Champagnie’s offensive rebounding also mattered late. After Fox stripped the ball from Jaylen Brown near midcourt, Champagnie scored on a putback to extend San Antonio’s lead to 97-93 with 41 seconds remaining.

That play demonstrates why raw scoring totals do not always tell the full story of a close NBA game.

Stephon Castle

Stephon Castle finished with nine points, five assists, and two steals.

He struggled as a scorer, shooting 3-for-16 from the field and 1-for-7 from three-point range.

However, his five assists were useful in supporting the Spurs’ offensive structure.

His final line was:

• 9 points
• 2 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 2 steals
• 2 turnovers
• 3-for-16 field goals
• 1-for-7 three-pointers
• 2-for-5 free throws

His shooting efficiency was below the team’s overall level, but San Antonio did not need every player to score efficiently to win.

Harrison Barnes and Luke Kornet

Harrison Barnes scored six points, grabbed one rebound, and recorded three assists.

He shot 2-for-8 from the field and 1-for-5 from three-point range.

Luke Kornet was extremely efficient from the field. He made both of his field-goal attempts and finished with five points and seven rebounds.

Kornet also recorded one assist and one block.

His 2-for-2 shooting stands out because the Spurs did not receive particularly strong three-point shooting as a team.

Spurs Bench Production

San Antonio’s bench scoring was led by Keldon Johnson’s 18 points, although he also played a major rotation role.

Dylan Harper added five points, Kelly Olynyk scored three, while Jeremy Sochan and Lindy Waters III finished scoreless.

Olynyk was perfect from the field, making his only field-goal attempt and his only three-point attempt.

The official scorer’s report also shows that Bismack Biyombo, Carter Bryant, and Jordan McLaughlin did not play.

Boston Celtics Player Statistics

Boston had two major scoring performances from Derrick White and Jaylen Brown.

White scored 29 points, while Brown added 27. Together, they accounted for 56 of Boston’s 95 points.

The Celtics also received 11 points from Luka Garza and 10 from Baylor Scheierman.

Derrick White

Derrick White was Boston’s leading scorer with 29 points.

He played 42 minutes and five seconds, the most minutes of any Celtic in the game.

White shot 11-for-26 from the field and 5-for-17 from three-point range. He also made both of his free throws.

His final line included:

• 29 points
• 9 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2 steals
• 1 turnover
• 2 blocks
• 11-for-26 field goals
• 5-for-17 three-pointers
• 2-for-2 free throws

White’s five made three-pointers helped Boston maintain offensive pressure, particularly during the early and middle portions of the contest.

Despite his high scoring total, San Antonio’s late defensive execution prevented Boston from turning his performance into a win.

Jaylen Brown

Jaylen Brown finished with 27 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists.

He shot 11-for-28 from the field and made five three-pointers on 11 attempts.

His line was:

• 27 points
• 8 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 5 turnovers
• 11-for-28 field goals
• 5-for-11 three-pointers

Brown’s seven assists were the most on Boston.

His five turnovers, however, were also the highest total on either team. One of those mistakes became particularly costly late when Fox stripped him near midcourt before Champagnie converted the putback.

The result shows how turnovers can become more damaging in a close game when they occur during the final possessions.

Neemias Queta

Neemias Queta recorded 13 rebounds, tying Champagnie for the game high.

He scored nine points and shot 4-for-6 from the field.

His final statistics included:

• 9 points
• 13 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2 blocks
• 1 turnover
• 4-for-6 field goals

Queta’s rebounding was one of Boston’s strongest individual statistical contributions.

He collected four offensive rebounds and nine defensive rebounds.

However, San Antonio’s team total of 53 rebounds was slightly higher than Boston’s 52.

Luka Garza

Luka Garza scored 11 points in 25 minutes and eight seconds.

He shot 4-for-6 from the field and made three of four three-point attempts.

That 75 percent shooting from beyond the arc was one of Boston’s most efficient individual shooting performances.

Garza also grabbed six rebounds and recorded one block.

His scoring helped the Celtics receive production beyond their two primary scorers.

Baylor Scheierman

Baylor Scheierman scored 10 points while shooting 4-for-5 from the field.

He made two of his three three-point attempts.

He also recorded two rebounds and two steals.

His four made field goals from only five attempts gave Boston efficient scoring during his minutes.

Payton Pritchard

Payton Pritchard scored four points and recorded five rebounds and four assists.

He shot 2-for-9 from the field and missed all three of his three-point attempts.

Although the scoring was limited, his four assists contributed to Boston’s 22 total assists.

Anfernee Simons and Jordan Walsh

Anfernee Simons finished with five points, two rebounds, and three assists.

He shot 2-for-8 from the field and 1-for-4 from three-point range.

Jordan Walsh did not score, finishing 0-for-3 from the field. He grabbed three rebounds.

Hugo Gonzalez also finished scoreless but contributed four rebounds and three assists.

The official box score lists Chris Boucher, Ron Harper Jr., Max Shulga, and Xavier Tillman as did not play.

Team Shooting Comparison

The shooting numbers reveal an interesting contrast.

San Antonio and Boston both made exactly 38 field goals.

However, Boston attempted 93 shots compared with 95 for San Antonio.

Category	Spurs	Celtics
Field Goals	38-95	38-93
Field Goal %	40.0%	40.9%
Three-Pointers	10-44	16-44
Three-Point %	22.7%	36.4%
Free Throws	14-20	3-4
Free-Throw %	70%	75%

Boston had a clear advantage from three-point range.

The Celtics made 16 threes compared with 10 for San Antonio. That gave Boston 18 more points from three-point shooting.

Yet the Spurs still won.

The main reason is that three-point shooting was only one part of the scoring equation.

San Antonio made 14 free throws while Boston attempted only four.

The Spurs also produced more second-chance scoring opportunities.

This is a useful lesson when analyzing celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats. A team can lose the three-point battle and still win if it creates enough value through rebounding, free throws, turnovers, and interior scoring.

Rebounding Battle

San Antonio finished with 53 rebounds.

Boston finished with 52.

At first glance, that one-rebound difference appears insignificant.

The more useful detail is how those rebounds translated into scoring opportunities.

San Antonio collected 12 offensive rebounds.

Boston collected nine.

That three-rebound difference helped the Spurs create additional possessions after missed shots.

The NBA’s official scorer’s report shows San Antonio scored 19 second-chance points compared with only eight for Boston.

That is an 11-point advantage in a game decided by five points.

This is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the final result.

Boston’s three-point shooting advantage was substantial, but San Antonio’s second-chance scoring helped offset it.

Turnovers and Possession Value

San Antonio committed eight turnovers.

Boston committed 10.

The difference was only two possessions, but the timing mattered.

Boston’s late turnover by Brown became particularly important because it happened in a tight fourth-quarter situation.

The NBA game recap describes the final sequence as a series of small but decisive possessions. San Antonio took the lead, Boston tied the game, Wembanyama restored the Spurs’ advantage, and Champagnie’s putback extended it.

The Spurs therefore combined lower turnover volume with strong late-game execution.

Turnover Comparison

Category	Spurs	Celtics
Turnovers	8	10
Steals	5	5
Points Off Turnovers	12	8

San Antonio’s ability to limit mistakes helped keep Boston from gaining easy transition opportunities.

Fourth Quarter Decided the Game

The first three quarters were relatively balanced.

Boston led 26-21 after one quarter.

The second quarter ended even at 29-29.

San Antonio then won the third quarter 23-20.

That left Boston with only a two-point advantage entering the fourth.

The final quarter belonged to San Antonio.

The Spurs scored 27 points while Boston scored 20.

The NBA recap reports that the game was tied at 84 before Baylor Scheierman hit a corner three to put Boston ahead. Derrick White then scored on a driving basket. San Antonio responded with a 9-2 run and took a 93-91 lead after Johnson’s three-pointer.

Brown tied the game again with a layup.

Wembanyama then hit a fadeaway jumper with 1:33 remaining.

Fox stripped Brown near midcourt on the next sequence.

Champagnie followed with a putback.

Wembanyama then hit another jumper to make it 99-95.

Those possessions effectively decided the game.

How San Antonio Won

The Spurs’ victory was built on several connected factors rather than one statistic.

1. Second-Chance Scoring

San Antonio scored 19 second-chance points.

Boston scored eight.

That 11-point advantage was larger than the final five-point margin.

2. Better Turnover Control

The Spurs committed eight turnovers compared with Boston’s 10.

They also scored 12 points off turnovers.

3. Interior Production

San Antonio scored 40 points in the paint.

Boston scored 36.

The Spurs therefore generated more points close to the basket despite Boston’s superior three-point shooting percentage.

4. Stronger Fourth Quarter

San Antonio won the fourth quarter 27-20.

That was the largest single-quarter scoring advantage of the game.

5. Multiple Contributors

Fox and Wembanyama each scored 21.

Johnson added 18.

Champagnie collected 13 rebounds.

That balance meant San Antonio did not depend on one player for its entire offensive output.

How Boston Built Its Lead

Boston’s early advantage came from efficient perimeter scoring and strong performances from White and Brown.

The Celtics made 16 three-pointers at a 36.4 percent rate.

White made five.

Brown made five.

Garza made three.

Scheierman made two.

That distribution kept Boston competitive even when the Spurs were creating extra possessions through offensive rebounding.

Boston also had strong individual performances from White and Brown.

Together, they scored 56 points.

However, the Celtics received only four points from Pritchard and five from Simons.

That reduced the scoring support available beyond the two leading scorers.

Celtics vs Spurs Bench Production

Bench scoring can become especially important when two teams are closely matched.

Boston received:

• Luka Garza: 11 points
• Baylor Scheierman: 10 points
• Anfernee Simons: 5 points
• Jordan Walsh: 0 points

San Antonio received:

• Keldon Johnson: 18 points
• Dylan Harper: 5 points
• Kelly Olynyk: 3 points
• Jeremy Sochan: 0 points
• Lindy Waters III: 0 points

Johnson’s 18 points were particularly valuable.

His scoring gave San Antonio an additional reliable offensive option alongside Fox and Wembanyama.

That balance became increasingly important during the fourth quarter.

Points in the Paint and Transition Scoring

San Antonio finished with 40 points in the paint.

Boston recorded 36.

The Spurs also had an 11-4 advantage in fast-break points.

Those numbers show that San Antonio found ways to score without depending heavily on outside shooting.

The Celtics made six more three-pointers than the Spurs.

Yet San Antonio made up some of that difference through interior and transition scoring.

The official NBA game data also records San Antonio’s largest lead as five points, while Boston’s largest lead was nine.

That means the game remained within a relatively narrow range throughout the contest.

Complete Spurs Player Stats

Player	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG	3PT	TO
De’Aaron Fox	21	9	6	1	0	9-16	1-6	2
Victor Wembanyama	21	6	1	0	3	8-17	1-4	0
Keldon Johnson	18	10	1	1	0	6-13	2-7	2
Julian Champagnie	12	13	3	0	1	5-12	2-8	0
Stephon Castle	9	2	5	2	0	3-16	1-7	2
Harrison Barnes	6	1	3	0	0	2-8	1-5	0
Dylan Harper	5	4	1	0	0	2-7	1-3	2
Luke Kornet	5	7	1	0	0	2-2	0-0	0
Kelly Olynyk	3	1	1	0	0	1-1	1-1	0
Jeremy Sochan	0	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-2	0
Lindy Waters III	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0

San Antonio finished 38-for-95 from the field, 10-for-44 from three-point range, and 14-for-20 at the free-throw line.

Complete Celtics Player Stats

Player	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG	3PT	TO
Derrick White	29	9	3	2	2	11-26	5-17	1
Jaylen Brown	27	8	7	0	0	11-28	5-11	5
Luka Garza	11	6	0	0	1	4-6	3-4	1
Baylor Scheierman	10	2	0	2	0	4-5	2-3	1
Neemias Queta	9	13	2	0	2	4-6	0-0	1
Anfernee Simons	5	2	3	0	0	2-8	1-4	1
Payton Pritchard	4	5	4	1	0	2-9	0-3	0
Hugo Gonzalez	0	4	3	0	0	0-2	0-2	0
Jordan Walsh	0	3	0	0	0	0-3	0-0	0

Boston finished 38-for-93 from the field, 16-for-44 from three-point range, and 3-for-4 from the free-throw line.

What the Match Statistics Tell Us

The most useful way to understand this game is to compare the major statistical categories rather than focus only on the final score.

Boston was better from three.

San Antonio was better at creating second chances.

Boston had two major scorers.

San Antonio had three players reach at least 18 points.

• Both teams recorded 22 assists.
• Both teams had five steals.
• Both teams were separated by only one total rebound.

Yet the Spurs won.

That tells us the deciding factors were not broad statistical dominance. Instead, the difference came from specific possession-level details.

The Spurs scored 19 second-chance points compared with eight for Boston.

• They scored 40 points in the paint compared with Boston’s 36.
• They scored 11 fast-break points compared with four.
• They committed two fewer turnovers.
• They also finished the game better.

These categories explain how San Antonio overcame Boston’s six additional made three-pointers.

Why the Five-Point Margin Matters

A five-point victory can sometimes be misleading if one team dominated most of the game.

That was not the case here.

Boston’s biggest lead was nine points.

San Antonio’s biggest lead was only five.

The game featured four lead changes and five ties.

That makes the final possessions especially important.

When a game stays close, individual plays can carry much more value.

A turnover can become a major swing.

An offensive rebound can create a new scoring opportunity.

A defensive stop can protect a narrow lead.

A late three-pointer can completely change the possession sequence.

That pattern was visible throughout the fourth quarter.

Key Statistical Takeaways

For readers studying the celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats, several numbers deserve special attention.

Fox and Wembanyama Combined for 42 Points

The Spurs’ two leading scorers each finished with 21 points.

Their combined total of 42 points provided a strong foundation.

Fox added six assists, while Wembanyama added three blocks.

Johnson Added a Double-Double

Johnson’s 18 points and 10 rebounds gave San Antonio another major statistical contribution.

His rebounding helped the Spurs compete with Boston’s strong frontcourt presence.

Champagnie Led the Game in Rebounds

Champagnie grabbed 13 rebounds.

That matched Boston’s Queta for the game high.

However, Champagnie’s late offensive rebound directly contributed to San Antonio’s closing advantage.

White and Brown Scored 56

White scored 29.

Brown scored 27.

Together, they produced more than half of Boston’s points.

Their output kept Boston in control for long stretches.

San Antonio Won the Second-Chance Battle

The 19-8 advantage in second-chance points was one of the most meaningful differences.

It gave San Antonio extra scoring opportunities without requiring better perimeter shooting.

A Closer Look at Shooting Efficiency

Boston’s 36.4 percent three-point shooting was considerably better than San Antonio’s 22.7 percent.

That difference normally creates a strong scoring advantage.

But the Celtics attempted only four free throws.

San Antonio attempted 20.

That 16-attempt difference from the free-throw line is another important part of the final result.

San Antonio converted 14 free throws.

Boston made three.

As a result, San Antonio scored 14 points from free throws while Boston scored only three.

The Spurs therefore gained 11 points from the free-throw line.

Combined with their 11-point advantage in second-chance scoring, that helped offset Boston’s three-point edge.

Understanding the Final Possessions

The closing minutes show why detailed player statistics are more useful when combined with game context.

Boston had the lead after Scheierman’s three-pointer.

White then scored.

San Antonio answered with a run.

Johnson’s three gave the Spurs a 93-91 lead.

Brown tied the game.

Wembanyama restored the lead.

Fox then made a defensive play against Brown.

Champagnie converted the resulting opportunity.

Wembanyama followed with another jumper.

San Antonio reached 99 points.

Boston could not produce enough offense to respond.

The final score became 100-95.

The NBA’s official game recap confirms Wembanyama’s late jumper and the Champagnie putback as key events in the closing sequence.

What Fans Should Remember From the Box Score

The game provides a useful example of why a box score should be read as a complete system.

• Looking only at three-point percentage would favor Boston.
• Looking only at total rebounds would show almost no difference.
• Looking only at assists would show a tie.
• Looking at scoring leaders would show strong performances from both teams.

But combining all of those numbers reveals a clearer picture.

San Antonio controlled several possession categories that mattered late.

The Spurs created more second-chance points.

• They scored more in the paint.
• They scored more in transition.
• They attempted far more free throws.
• They committed fewer turnovers.

Most importantly, they performed better in the fourth quarter.

That combination allowed them to win despite Boston’s superior perimeter shooting.

Final Assessment of the Player Statistics

The official numbers show a highly competitive game.

San Antonio finished with 100 points on 40 percent shooting.

Boston scored 95 points on 40.9 percent shooting.

The Celtics made 16 three-pointers.

The Spurs made only 10.

Still, San Antonio created enough additional value through rebounds, free throws, interior scoring, transition opportunities, and turnover control.

Fox and Wembanyama provided 21 points each.

Johnson added 18 and 10 rebounds.

Champagnie produced 13 rebounds and made a crucial late putback.

For Boston, White’s 29 points and Brown’s 27 points were outstanding individual scoring efforts.

Queta’s 13 rebounds also stood out.

However, the Celtics could not maintain their early advantage through the final quarter.

The result was a 100-95 San Antonio victory.

For anyone researching celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats, the most important lesson is that the final score cannot be explained by shooting percentage alone. The full box score shows a game decided by possession quality, rebounding opportunities, free throws, interior scoring, and late-game execution.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Celtics in scoring against the Spurs?

Derrick White led Boston with 29 points. He shot 11-for-26 from the field and made five three-pointers.

Who led the Spurs in scoring?

De’Aaron Fox and Victor Wembanyama both scored 21 points for San Antonio.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Julian Champagnie and Neemias Queta both recorded 13 rebounds, tying for the game high.

What was the final score between the Spurs and Celtics?

San Antonio defeated Boston 100-95.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Boston shot better from three, making 16 of 44 attempts for 36.4 percent. San Antonio made 10 of 44 for 22.7 percent.

Why did the Spurs win despite shooting worse from three?

San Antonio created more second-chance points, scored more in the paint, attempted many more free throws, committed fewer turnovers, and outscored Boston 27-20 in the fourth quarter.

Conclusion

The Spurs’ 100-95 victory over the Celtics was a close contest decided by several small statistical advantages.

De’Aaron Fox and Victor Wembanyama each scored 21 points, while Keldon Johnson contributed 18 points and 10 rebounds. Julian Champagnie added 13 rebounds and made a crucial late putback.

Boston received 29 points from Derrick White and 27 from Jaylen Brown. Neemias Queta also finished with 13 rebounds.

The Celtics had the stronger three-point performance, making 16 shots from beyond the arc compared with San Antonio’s 10. However, the Spurs generated more second-chance points, more points in the paint, more fast-break points, and more free-throw opportunities.

The fourth quarter ultimately separated the teams. San Antonio scored 27 points while Boston scored 20.

The game therefore stands as a strong example of why complete player and team statistics matter. Scoring totals provide the starting point, but rebounds, turnovers, shooting efficiency, free throws, and late-game possessions provide the deeper explanation.