New England Patriots vs Buffalo Bills Match Player Stats
The new england patriots vs buffalo bills match player stats from October 6, 2025, tell the story of a close 23-20 Patriots victory in which both teams produced strong offensive numbers but differed in how they converted those opportunities. New England finished with 344 total yards, while Buffalo recorded 371. Josh Allen threw for 253 yards and two touchdowns, but Drake Maye answered with 273 passing yards and no interceptions. The Patriots also received two rushing touchdowns from Rhamondre Stevenson and three successful field goals from Andy Borregales. Buffalo controlled more of the rushing production, but New England made enough decisive plays to leave with the win.
New England Patriots vs Buffalo Bills Match Player Stats
The final score was New England 23, Buffalo 20. The scoring pattern shows how competitive the game remained throughout all four quarters.
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| New England Patriots | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 23 |
| Buffalo Bills | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 20 |
Neither team separated itself by more than three points at the end of a quarter. Buffalo started slowly, failing to score in the opening period, but responded with 20 points across the final three quarters.
New England followed a different pattern. The Patriots scored in every quarter and finished strongly with 10 fourth-quarter points.
That scoring balance is important when examining the new england patriots vs buffalo bills match player stats. The box score was not simply a case of one offense dominating the other. Instead, several individual performances combined to determine the result.
Game Summary and Team Production
The Patriots entered the game with a 3-2 record, including a 2-0 away record. Buffalo entered at 4-1 with a 3-1 home record.
Despite Buffalo’s stronger overall record at the time, New England produced the winning performance.
The Bills actually gained more total yards.
- Patriots: 344 total yards
- Bills: 371 total yards
- Patriots passing: 273 yards
- Bills passing: 253 yards
- Patriots rushing: 71 yards
- Bills rushing: 118 yards
Buffalo therefore held a 27-yard advantage in total offense.
The more interesting difference came through the balance of the offenses. New England gained 202 more passing yards than rushing yards. Buffalo produced a much more balanced attack, with 118 rushing yards and 253 passing yards.
This demonstrates why total yardage alone cannot explain a football result.
A team can gain more yards and still lose if it fails to turn those yards into enough points. That principle is especially useful when analyzing these new england patriots vs buffalo bills match player stats.
Drake Maye Passing Performance
Drake Maye delivered one of the most important statistical performances for New England.
His passing line was:
| Statistic | Drake Maye |
| Completions | 22 |
| Attempts | 30 |
| Completion Rate | 73.3% |
| Passing Yards | 273 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 4 |
| Passer Rating | 101.1 |
Maye completed 22 of 30 attempts for 273 yards.
His completion percentage was approximately 73.3%, which shows that New England consistently found completions through the passing game. More importantly, he avoided an interception.
That mattered because Buffalo’s defense generated four team sacks. New England’s quarterback therefore faced considerable pressure, yet he did not give Buffalo an interception.
The four sacks are one area where the passing statistics need additional context. Maye’s 273 passing yards look strong on their own, but the pressure allowed by the Patriots’ offense created additional challenges.
Still, his 101.1 passer rating indicates that the passing attack remained productive.
Maye did not throw a touchdown, so his contribution was different from Josh Allen’s. His value came through moving the ball, maintaining efficiency and avoiding the turnover that could have changed a three-point game.
Josh Allen Passing Statistics
Josh Allen produced the higher touchdown total among the two quarterbacks.
His final passing line was:
| Statistic | Josh Allen |
| Completions | 22 |
| Attempts | 31 |
| Completion Rate | 71.0% |
| Passing Yards | 253 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 103.3 |
Allen completed 22 of 31 passes for 253 yards.
His completion rate was approximately 71.0%, slightly below Maye’s 73.3%. However, Allen produced two passing touchdowns, while Maye finished without one.
Allen also posted a slightly higher passer rating of 103.3.
On paper, those numbers describe an effective passing performance. The important issue was the interception.
Buffalo finished with two lost fumbles as well. That means the Bills gave away three turnovers through interceptions and lost fumbles combined.
In a game decided by three points, turnovers deserve particular attention.
Rhamondre Stevenson Drives the Patriots’ Rushing Score
New England’s rushing production was modest compared with Buffalo’s.
The Patriots finished with 71 rushing yards on 22 carries.
That produced an average of approximately 3.2 yards per carry.
Rhamondre Stevenson became especially important near the goal line.
His recorded rushing line was:
| Statistic | Rhamondre Stevenson |
| Carries | 7 |
| Rushing Yards | 14 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 2 |
Stevenson averaged 2.0 yards per carry, but his two touchdowns were more important than his rushing average.
This is a useful example of why box score analysis should separate volume, efficiency and scoring impact.
A running back can have limited yardage while still making a major contribution if his opportunities come in high-value situations.
Stevenson’s two touchdowns accounted for eight of New England’s 23 points when combined with the successful extra points.
TreVeyon Henderson’s Rushing Contribution
TreVeyon Henderson led the Patriots in rushing yardage.
He recorded:
- 6 carries
- 24 rushing yards
- 4.0 yards per carry
His six carries represented a relatively small workload, but he led New England in rushing yardage.
The Patriots’ overall rushing numbers show that the team did not rely on one dominant rushing performance. Instead, the ground game provided enough support while the passing attack carried most of the offensive yardage.
That balance helped New England remain competitive despite Buffalo’s advantage on the ground.
Josh Allen Leads Buffalo’s Rushing Attack
Josh Allen was Buffalo’s leading rusher with 53 yards on nine carries.
His rushing production was:
| Statistic | Josh Allen |
| Carries | 9 |
| Rushing Yards | 53 |
| Average | 5.9 yards per carry |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 |
Allen’s 53 rushing yards represented nearly half of Buffalo’s 118 team rushing yards.
That is significant because it shows how much of Buffalo’s rushing output came directly from its quarterback.
The Bills finished with 29 rushing attempts compared with 22 for New England. They therefore had seven more rushing attempts and gained 47 more rushing yards.
The ground advantage belonged clearly to Buffalo.
However, the Patriots compensated through their passing production and scoring efficiency.
Stefon Diggs Leads the Patriots’ Receiving Group
Stefon Diggs produced the biggest receiving performance for New England.
His line was:
| Statistic | Stefon Diggs |
| Receptions | 10 |
| Targets | 12 |
| Receiving Yards | 146 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 0 |
Diggs caught 10 of 12 targets.
His catch rate on those targets was approximately 83.3%.
He also accounted for more than half of New England’s 273 receiving yards.
His 146 yards represented approximately 53.5% of the Patriots’ receiving total.
That level of involvement made Diggs the central receiving figure in the game.
Although he did not score a touchdown, his ability to consistently gain receiving yardage gave the Patriots a reliable way to sustain their passing attack.
The 12 targets also show that Maye repeatedly looked in his direction.
Dalton Kincaid Leads Buffalo Receivers
Dalton Kincaid was Buffalo’s leading receiver by yardage.
His recorded line was:
| Statistic | Dalton Kincaid |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Receiving Yards | 108 |
Kincaid surpassed 100 receiving yards while Buffalo’s total receiving output reached 253 yards.
His 108 yards represented approximately 42.7% of Buffalo’s receiving total.
That makes his contribution particularly important when evaluating the Bills’ passing production.
Unlike New England, Buffalo distributed its touchdowns among other receivers. Curtis Samuel and Keon Coleman each recorded one receiving touchdown.
Buffalo’s Receiving Touchdowns
The Bills finished with 22 receptions for 253 yards and two receiving touchdowns.
The touchdown scorers were:
- Curtis Samuel: 1 receiving touchdown
- Keon Coleman: 1 receiving touchdown
This meant Buffalo converted its passing production into touchdowns more effectively than New England.
The Patriots had 273 receiving yards but no receiving touchdowns.
That difference is one of the clearest statistical contrasts in the game.
New England generated more passing yards, but Buffalo generated more passing touchdowns.
This is exactly why individual statistics need to be examined alongside scoring results.
Patriots vs Bills Receiving Comparison
The receiving comparison provides another useful view of the game.
| Category | Patriots | Bills |
| Receptions | 22 | 22 |
| Receiving Yards | 273 | 253 |
| Receiving TDs | 0 | 2 |
| Leading Receiver | Stefon Diggs | Dalton Kincaid |
| Leading Receiver Yards | 146 | 108 |
Both teams recorded exactly 22 receptions.
The Patriots gained 20 more receiving yards, but Buffalo scored two receiving touchdowns.
That is a major distinction.
New England’s receiving attack was more productive in raw yardage. Buffalo’s passing game was more productive in touchdown output.
Defensive Player Statistics
Defense also played a major role.
The Patriots recorded 70 total defensive tackles, including 39 solo tackles.
They also produced:
- 1 team sack
- 1 interception
- 2 forced or recorded fumbles according to the supplied team totals
- Marcus Jones with 1 interception
Buffalo recorded 58 total tackles, including 45 solo tackles.
The Bills also produced:
- 4 team sacks
- 0 interceptions
The Patriots therefore had more total tackles, while Buffalo generated more sacks.
These numbers describe different aspects of defensive performance.
Tackles indicate involvement in stopping plays, while sacks represent direct disruption of passing plays. Interceptions can produce an even larger change in possession value.
Marcus Jones’ Interception
Marcus Jones recorded New England’s only interception.
That play matters because Josh Allen otherwise produced a strong statistical passing performance.
Allen finished with 253 passing yards, two touchdowns and a 103.3 passer rating. However, the interception gave New England a takeaway in a game that ended with a three-point margin.
Buffalo also lost two fumbles.
As a result, turnover management became one of the clearest statistical differences between the teams.
New England lost one fumble.
Buffalo lost two fumbles and threw one interception.
That produced a three-turnover disadvantage for Buffalo in the supplied statistics.
Bills Defense Creates Four Sacks
Buffalo’s defense recorded four sacks.
That was four times the Patriots’ team total of one sack.
The number highlights the pressure Maye faced during the game.
Even with that pressure, New England’s quarterback completed 22 of 30 attempts and finished with 273 passing yards.
The combination of four sacks and zero interceptions creates an interesting defensive story.
Buffalo was successful at creating negative plays through quarterback pressure. New England was more successful at avoiding the most damaging passing turnover.
Both facts can be true at the same time.
Turnovers and Their Importance
Turnovers were among the most important parts of this matchup.
| Category | Patriots | Bills |
| Fumbles | 2 | 2 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 2 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Team Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
New England gave the ball away once through a lost fumble.
Buffalo lost two fumbles and threw one interception.
Therefore, the Bills had three recorded turnovers compared with one for the Patriots.
In a 23-20 game, possession security becomes particularly relevant.
It is not accurate to say that turnovers alone explain every part of the result. Football games contain many connected factors.
However, the turnover difference is one of the strongest statistical signals in this box score.
Kicking Performance
Andy Borregales was perfect on field-goal attempts for New England.
His kicking statistics were:
- 3 field goals made on 3 attempts
- Long field goal: 52 yards
- 2 extra points made
- 11 total points
Those 11 points represented nearly half of New England’s 23-point total.
Matt Prater also converted every field-goal attempt for Buffalo.
His line was:
- 2 field goals made on 2 attempts
- Long field goal: 45 yards
- 2 extra points made
- 8 total points
Both kickers were perfect on field goals.
The difference was that New England attempted and made one more field goal.
In a three-point game, that additional successful field goal was directly relevant to the final scoring margin.
Punting and Field Position
New England punter Bryce Baringer recorded:
- 4 punts
- 191 total punt yards
- 47.8-yard average
- 73-yard long punt
Buffalo’s Mitch Wishnowsky recorded:
- 2 punts
- 70 total punt yards
- 35.0-yard average
- 43-yard long punt
The Patriots punted twice as often.
Baringer’s 73-yard long punt was also substantially longer than Wishnowsky’s 43-yard long.
Punting statistics do not directly appear in the final score, but they can affect field position and the number of possessions available to each offense.
Kick Return Statistics
The kick return numbers were relatively close in volume.
| Category | Patriots | Bills |
| Returns | 5 | 5 |
| Return Yards | 112 | 127 |
| Average | 22.4 | 25.4 |
Buffalo gained 15 more kick return yards.
The Bills averaged 25.4 yards per return compared with 22.4 for New England.
That gave Buffalo another small advantage in special teams.
Yet, like total yardage, return production did not determine the winner by itself.
New England Patriots vs Buffalo Bills Match Player Stats: Key Statistical Differences
Several statistics stand out when the complete box score is considered.
1. Buffalo gained more total yards
The Bills finished with 371 yards compared with 344 for New England.
That was a 27-yard advantage.
2. New England passed for more yards
Maye threw for 273 yards.
Allen threw for 253 yards.
The Patriots therefore had a 20-yard passing advantage.
3. Buffalo rushed for more yards
The Bills recorded 118 rushing yards.
New England recorded 71.
That gave Buffalo a 47-yard rushing advantage.
4. Buffalo scored more passing touchdowns
Allen threw two touchdowns.
Maye threw none.
5. New England scored more rushing touchdowns
The Patriots recorded two rushing touchdowns, both by Stevenson.
Buffalo recorded no rushing touchdowns.
6. Buffalo had more turnovers
The Bills lost two fumbles and threw one interception.
New England lost one fumble and threw no interceptions.
7. Buffalo recorded more sacks
The Bills produced four sacks.
New England produced one.
8. New England’s kicker scored 11 points
Borregales made all three field goals and both extra points.
Why Total Yardage Did Not Tell the Whole Story
The final statistics create an interesting contradiction.
Buffalo gained 371 yards.
New England gained 344.
Usually, the team with more offensive yardage has a strong statistical foundation. But the Patriots still won.
The reason is that yardage does not have equal value on every possession.
Touchdowns, field goals, turnovers and failed scoring opportunities can change the outcome without changing total yardage dramatically.
Buffalo’s 118 rushing yards were useful, but the team also committed three recorded turnovers.
New England’s passing game produced 273 yards, and the Patriots converted their scoring opportunities through two rushing touchdowns and three field goals.
The result was a 23-20 victory despite Buffalo holding the total-yardage advantage.
A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency
The Patriots completed 22 of 30 passes.
Buffalo completed 22 of 31.
Both quarterbacks therefore produced almost identical completion totals.
The difference came from what happened after those completions.
Maye averaged 12.4 passing yards per completion based on the supplied passing totals.
Allen averaged approximately 11.5 yards per completion.
Maye also finished without an interception.
Allen produced two touchdowns, but his interception became part of Buffalo’s three-turnover total.
The statistical lesson is simple.
Completion totals alone do not explain quarterback performance. Yardage, touchdowns, turnovers, sacks and the scoring result all provide additional context.
Rushing Efficiency Comparison
New England ran the ball 22 times for 71 yards.
That equals approximately 3.2 yards per carry.
Buffalo ran 29 times for 118 yards.
That equals approximately 4.1 yards per carry.
Buffalo therefore held a clear advantage in rushing efficiency.
Josh Allen’s nine carries for 53 yards were especially important.
His rushing average was approximately 5.9 yards per carry, which was considerably higher than Buffalo’s overall team rushing average.
New England’s most productive individual runner by yardage was Henderson, with 24 yards on six carries.
Stevenson was the scoring specialist, with two rushing touchdowns despite 14 rushing yards.
The Role of Scoring Distribution
The Patriots’ 23 points came through several methods.
Their scoring profile included:
- Two rushing touchdowns
- Three field goals
- Two extra points
Buffalo’s 20 points included:
- Two passing touchdowns
- Two field goals
- Two extra points
This distinction provides one of the clearest explanations of the final score.
New England did not need a passing touchdown to reach 23 points.
Instead, the Patriots combined rushing touchdowns with reliable kicking.
Buffalo produced two passing touchdowns but missed the additional scoring opportunities created by its turnovers and overall possession results.
What the Player Stats Say About the Game
The new england patriots vs buffalo bills match player stats show two offenses that succeeded in different ways.
New England’s passing game was led by Maye and Diggs.
Maye provided 273 passing yards without an interception. Diggs caught 10 passes for 146 yards.
Buffalo’s passing game relied on Allen and Kincaid.
Allen threw for 253 yards and two touchdowns. Kincaid led the Bills with 108 receiving yards.
On the ground, Buffalo had the advantage.
Allen led all Buffalo rushers with 53 yards, and the Bills finished with 118 team rushing yards.
New England’s rushing game was less productive overall, but Stevenson converted two rushing opportunities into touchdowns.
That contrast between yardage and scoring is central to understanding the result.
Important Takeaways for Fantasy and Statistical Analysis
For readers using box scores for fantasy football research, player evaluation or statistical analysis, this game offers several useful lessons.
First, receiving volume matters.
Diggs received 12 targets and caught 10 passes. That combination produced 146 receiving yards even without a touchdown.
Second, quarterback rushing can add significant value.
Allen produced 53 rushing yards on nine carries, giving him an important source of production beyond his passing statistics.
Third, touchdowns can distort the perception of rushing efficiency.
Stevenson averaged only 2.0 yards per carry but scored twice.
Finally, turnovers remain important when evaluating team outcomes.
A player or team can accumulate strong yardage totals while still losing because of possession mistakes.
How to Read This Box Score Correctly
A useful approach is to examine the game in layers.
Start with the final score.
Then compare total yards.
After that, separate passing and rushing.
Next, examine touchdowns.
Finally, check turnovers, sacks and kicking.
Following this process prevents one statistic from dominating the entire analysis.
For this matchup, that approach produces a more complete picture.
- The Bills won the yardage battle.
- The Bills won the rushing battle.
- The Bills recorded more sacks.
- The Patriots won the turnover battle.
- The Patriots passed for more yards.
- The Patriots scored two rushing touchdowns.
- The Patriots also made three field goals.
Those combined differences help explain how New England won despite Buffalo’s 27-yard advantage in total offense.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Patriots and Bills?
The New England Patriots defeated the Buffalo Bills 23-20 on October 6, 2025.
Who led the Patriots in passing?
Drake Maye led New England with 22 completions on 30 attempts for 273 yards. He threw no touchdowns and no interceptions.
Who led the Bills in passing?
Josh Allen completed 22 of 31 passes for 253 yards, two touchdowns and one interception.
Who was the Patriots’ leading receiver?
Stefon Diggs led New England with 10 receptions for 146 yards on 12 targets.
Who led the Bills in rushing?
Josh Allen led Buffalo with nine carries for 53 yards.
Which team had more total yards?
Buffalo had more total yards. The Bills recorded 371 yards, while the Patriots finished with 344.
Conclusion
The new england patriots vs buffalo bills match player stats from October 6, 2025, show a game where the final score cannot be explained by total yardage alone.
Buffalo produced 371 total yards, including 118 rushing yards. Josh Allen delivered 253 passing yards and two touchdowns, while Dalton Kincaid led the team with 108 receiving yards.
New England produced 344 total yards, but Maye passed for 273 yards without throwing an interception. Stefon Diggs added 146 receiving yards on 10 catches, while Rhamondre Stevenson scored two rushing touchdowns.
The Patriots also made three field goals through Andy Borregales, who finished with 11 points.
The biggest statistical difference was turnover management. Buffalo lost two fumbles and threw one interception, while New England lost one fumble and did not throw an interception.
The game therefore provides a useful example of why football analysis should consider the entire box score. Yardage, touchdowns, turnovers, sacks, kicking and individual player production all contribute to the final result.
For anyone studying the new england patriots vs buffalo bills match player stats, the clearest lesson is that the most important numbers are not always the largest ones. A 27-yard advantage in total offense did not prevent Buffalo from losing. New England combined efficient passing, two rushing touchdowns, reliable kicking and better ball security to finish with a 23-20 victory.
