New Orleans Saints vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats
The new orleans saints vs los angeles rams match player stats from August 23, 2026, tell a clear story about a preseason game that quickly moved away from New Orleans. The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Saints 34-0 in NFL Preseason Week 2, combining efficient passing, strong rushing production, defensive pressure, and two interceptions returned for 103 yards and a touchdown. New Orleans, meanwhile, struggled to turn its offensive possessions into points and finished without a touchdown, field goal, or extra point.
For readers looking beyond the final score, the player numbers provide more useful detail. The Saints finished with 188 passing yards and 105 rushing yards, while the Rams produced 254 passing yards and 151 rushing yards. Los Angeles also scored three rushing touchdowns and forced two interceptions. Those figures help explain why the game became one-sided even though both teams were using preseason lineups.
This breakdown examines the major player statistics, team totals, quarterback performances, rushing and receiving production, defensive numbers, turnovers, kicking, and the statistical patterns that shaped the 34-0 result.
New Orleans Saints vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats at a Glance
The game was played on August 23, 2026, during Week 2 of the NFL preseason.
| Category | New Orleans Saints | Los Angeles Rams |
| Final Score | 0 | 34 |
| Passing | 20/35, 188 yards | 27/43, 254 yards |
| Passing Average | 5.6 yards | 5.9 yards |
| Passing TDs | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 2 | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 for 8 yards | 0 |
| Rushing | 26 carries, 105 yards | 30 carries, 151 yards |
| Rushing Average | 4.0 yards | 5.0 yards |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 3 |
| Receptions | 20 | 27 |
| Receiving Yards | 196 | 254 |
| Receiving TDs | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | 2, 1 lost | 0, 0 lost |
| Defensive Interceptions | 0 | 2 |
| Defensive INT Return Yards | 0 | 103 |
| Field Goals | 0/1 | 2/2 |
| Extra Points | 0/0 | 4/4 |
The biggest statistical difference was not simply passing yardage. Los Angeles was more productive across several areas at once. The Rams ran for 46 more yards, averaged one yard more per rushing attempt, avoided interceptions, scored three rushing touchdowns, and generated two defensive interceptions.
How the Game Developed
The Rams scored first with a 3-0 advantage after the opening quarter. The second quarter changed the shape of the contest, as Los Angeles added 17 points while New Orleans remained scoreless.
At halftime, the Rams had established a 20-0 lead.
Los Angeles added another seven points in the third quarter and seven more in the fourth. New Orleans never put a point on the board, resulting in a 34-0 shutout.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring was:
| Quarter | Saints | Rams |
| First | 0 | 3 |
| Second | 0 | 17 |
| Third | 0 | 7 |
| Fourth | 0 | 7 |
| Total | 0 | 34 |
This scoring pattern is important because the Rams did not need one explosive scoring quarter to produce the final margin. Their production continued after halftime, while the Saints remained unable to convert their opportunities into points.
Saints Quarterback Statistics
The Saints used Spencer Rattler and Zach Wilson at quarterback.
Spencer Rattler
Rattler completed 14 of 23 passes for 141 yards. He averaged 6.1 yards per attempt and finished with a 60.2 passer rating.
His passing line was:
- 14 completions
- 23 attempts
- 141 passing yards
- 6.1 yards per attempt
- 0 touchdowns
- 1 interception
- 60.2 passer rating
Rattler also contributed 21 rushing yards on five carries, averaging 4.2 yards per attempt. His longest run was seven yards.
The 141 passing yards represented the majority of New Orleans’ passing production. The Saints’ team total was 188 yards, meaning Rattler accounted for most of the team’s aerial output.
However, the interception became an important part of the overall offensive picture. New Orleans finished with two interceptions as a team, and neither quarterback produced a passing touchdown.
Zach Wilson
Wilson completed 6 of 12 passes for 55 yards. He averaged 4.6 yards per attempt and finished with a 28.1 passer rating.
His passing numbers included:
- 6 completions
- 12 attempts
- 55 yards
- 4.6 yards per attempt
- 0 touchdowns
- 1 interception
- 28.1 passer rating
- 1 sack for 8 yards
Wilson also rushed four times for 19 yards, averaging 4.8 yards per carry. His longest run was seven yards.
The lower passing efficiency meant that the Saints did not get enough production from the quarterback position to keep pace with Los Angeles.
Rams Quarterback Statistics
The Rams used Stetson Bennett IV and Ty Simpson.
Stetson Bennett IV
Bennett completed 19 of 31 passes for 181 yards. He averaged 5.8 yards per attempt and recorded a 77.5 passer rating.
His passing line:
- 19 completions
- 31 attempts
- 181 yards
- 5.8 yards per attempt
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 77.5 passer rating
Bennett also ran twice for nine yards and scored two rushing touchdowns.
That combination makes his performance particularly notable. Although he did not throw a touchdown, he contributed directly to the scoreboard as a runner.
Ty Simpson
Simpson completed 8 of 12 passes for 73 yards. He averaged 6.1 yards per attempt and posted an 83.0 passer rating.
He also carried the ball three times for 10 yards.
Simpson’s passing numbers were limited by the nature of preseason usage, but he avoided an interception and maintained a higher passer rating than either Saints quarterback.
Passing Comparison
The overall passing numbers show a modest yardage advantage for Los Angeles, but the turnover difference is much more significant.
The Saints completed 20 of 35 passes for 188 yards. The Rams completed 27 of 43 for 254 yards.
That produced a difference of:
- 66 passing yards in favor of Los Angeles
- 7 more completions for Los Angeles
- 8 more pass attempts for Los Angeles
- 2 interceptions thrown by New Orleans
- 0 interceptions thrown by Los Angeles
The Rams also allowed no sacks, while the Saints surrendered one sack for eight yards.
The Rams’ team passer rating was 79.0 compared with 49.2 for New Orleans.
These numbers show why the final score cannot be explained by passing yardage alone. The difference was a combination of completion volume, turnover avoidance, quarterback efficiency, and the Rams’ ability to complement the passing game with their rushing attack.
Saints Rushing Statistics
New Orleans ran the football 26 times for 105 yards, averaging 4.0 yards per carry.
The leading Saints rushing performances were:
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Kendre Miller | 6 | 22 | 3.7 | 0 | 6 |
| Spencer Rattler | 5 | 21 | 4.2 | 0 | 7 |
| Ty Chandler | 6 | 21 | 3.5 | 0 | 7 |
| Zach Wilson | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 0 | 7 |
| CJ Donaldson | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 0 | 9 |
| Devin Neal | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 4 |
Kendre Miller led the Saints in rushing attempts and yards with six carries for 22 yards.
Rattler and Wilson also provided some rushing production from the quarterback position. Their combined rushing total was 40 yards on nine attempts.
CJ Donaldson averaged 5.0 yards per carry and recorded the longest Saints rushing play of the game at nine yards.
The important issue for New Orleans was not that the rushing game completely failed. A 4.0-yard average is capable of supporting an offense in many circumstances. The larger problem was that the Saints did not turn their rushing production into touchdowns.
Rams Rushing Statistics
The Rams ran 30 times for 151 yards, averaging 5.0 yards per carry.
Their leading rushing numbers were:
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Jarquez Hunter | 12 | 68 | 5.7 | 1 | 12 |
| Jordan Waters | 10 | 54 | 5.4 | 0 | 9 |
| Ty Simpson | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 0 | 8 |
| Stetson Bennett IV | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 2 | 8 |
| Brennan Presley | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| Dean Connors | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 4 |
Jarquez Hunter was the Rams’ leading rusher with 68 yards on 12 carries. His 5.7-yard average was the highest among the Rams’ players with multiple carries.
Jordan Waters added 54 yards on 10 carries, averaging 5.4 yards.
Together, Hunter and Waters produced 122 rushing yards on 22 attempts. That means the pair accounted for most of the Rams’ rushing yardage.
Bennett’s two rushing touchdowns were also crucial. His passing line did not include a touchdown, but his rushing contribution directly affected the scoreboard.
The Rushing Difference
The Saints averaged 4.0 yards per carry. The Rams averaged 5.0.
That one-yard difference per attempt may look small, but it becomes more meaningful over a full game.
Los Angeles finished with 151 rushing yards compared with 105 for New Orleans. The 46-yard advantage gave the Rams additional offensive production without requiring a passing touchdown.
The Rams also scored three rushing touchdowns.
The Saints scored none.
That is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the shutout. Los Angeles converted its rushing production into points, while New Orleans generated yardage without finding the end zone.
Saints Receiving Statistics
The Saints recorded 20 receptions for 196 receiving yards.
CJ Donaldson led New Orleans with four receptions for 51 yards. His average was 12.8 yards per reception, and he produced the game’s longest Saints reception at 32 yards.
Jalen Moreno-Cropper caught two passes for 34 yards, averaging 17.0 yards per reception. His longest reception was 25 yards.
Moliki Matavao added three receptions for 34 yards.
The remaining Saints receiving production included:
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | Long |
| CJ Donaldson | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 32 |
| Jalen Moreno-Cropper | 2 | 34 | 17.0 | 25 |
| Moliki Matavao | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 14 |
| Bryce Lance | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 12 |
| Treyton Welch | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 9 |
| Ty Chandler | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 |
| Kevin Austin Jr. | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 |
| Ronnie Bell | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 |
| Cody Hardy | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 |
| Zaire Mitchell-Paden | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 |
| Bub Means | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 |
| Brock Rechsteiner | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 |
The receiving statistics show that New Orleans did have players capable of producing chunk plays. Donaldson’s 32-yard reception and Moreno-Cropper’s 25-yard catch demonstrate that the Saints were not completely without explosive plays.
The issue was consistency and finishing possessions.
Rams Receiving Statistics
Los Angeles recorded 27 receptions for 254 receiving yards.
CJ Daniels led the Rams in both receptions and receiving yards, catching eight passes for 68 yards on 13 targets.
His average was 8.5 yards per reception.
Alex Bachman caught four passes for 48 yards, averaging 12.0 yards per reception.
Tyler Scott produced 36 yards on two receptions, averaging an impressive 18.0 yards per catch. His longest reception was 20 yards.
Other Rams receiving totals included:
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | Targets | Long |
| CJ Daniels | 8 | 68 | 8.5 | 13 | 17 |
| Alex Bachman | 4 | 48 | 12.0 | 4 | 17 |
| Tyler Scott | 2 | 36 | 18.0 | 4 | 20 |
| Brennan Presley | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 6 | 14 |
| Tru Edwards | 3 | 27 | 9.0 | 4 | 15 |
| Dan Villari | 1 | 24 | 24.0 | 2 | 24 |
| Max Klare | 4 | 12 | 3.0 | 6 | 4 |
| Jordan Waters | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 2 | 4 |
Dan Villari had the highest yards-per-reception figure among the listed Rams receivers, with 24 yards on one catch.
The Rams’ receiving production was spread across multiple players rather than being concentrated in only one target.
Receiving Efficiency and Target Distribution
One useful way to interpret preseason receiving statistics is to consider targets alongside receptions.
CJ Daniels received 13 targets and caught eight passes. That gave him the largest workload in the Rams passing game.
Brennan Presley had six targets and four receptions.
Max Klare also received six targets, finishing with four receptions for 12 yards.
For New Orleans, Treyton Welch had five targets but finished with two receptions for 11 yards. Bub Means had four targets and one reception for five yards, while CJ Donaldson caught all four of his targets for 51 yards.
That contrast illustrates why raw reception totals can sometimes hide an important part of a player’s performance. Target volume can indicate involvement even when the final receiving yardage is limited.
Defensive Statistics and Turnovers
Turnovers were one of the most important statistical differences in the game.
The Saints threw two interceptions.
The Rams threw none.
Los Angeles also recorded two interceptions, returning them for a combined 103 yards and one touchdown.
Alex Cook produced the biggest defensive play of the game with an interception return of 100 yards for a touchdown.
Al’zillion Hamilton added another interception with a three-yard return.
The defensive turnover summary was:
| Statistic | Saints | Rams |
| Interceptions | 0 | 2 |
| INT Return Yards | 0 | 103 |
| INT Return TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles | 2 | 0 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 0 |
New Orleans also lost one fumble.
That means the Saints committed three total turnovers through two interceptions and one lost fumble, while Los Angeles did not lose a turnover.
In a preseason game, individual roster evaluation matters, but turnovers still directly influence the scoreboard. The Rams converted one interception into a defensive touchdown, turning a possession-ending play into seven points.
Defensive Pressure
The defensive statistics show another important difference.
The Saints recorded:
- 76 total tackles
- 38 solo tackles
- 0 sacks
- 0 tackles for loss
- 3 passes defended
- 0 quarterback hits
The Rams recorded:
- 72 total tackles
- 32 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 1 tackle for loss
- 8 passes defended
- 5 quarterback hits
- 1 defensive touchdown
The Rams produced more quarterback pressure, more passes defended, and the game’s only sack.
The eight passes defended are particularly notable compared with New Orleans’ three. Combined with two interceptions, those figures suggest that Los Angeles created more disruption in the passing game.
Kicking and Special Teams
The kicking statistics also contributed to the final result.
New Orleans attempted one field goal and did not make it. The Saints did not attempt an extra point because they never scored a touchdown.
The Rams converted both of their field-goal attempts and all four extra-point attempts.
| Kicking Category | Saints | Rams |
| Field Goals | 0/1 | 2/2 |
| FG Percentage | 0% | 100% |
| Long Field Goal | 0 yards | 26 yards |
| Extra Points | 0/0 | 4/4 |
| Kicking Points | 0 | 10 |
The Rams’ kickers accounted for 10 points.
Their two successful field goals helped establish the early lead before the offense produced additional touchdowns.
Return Game
The Saints had four kickoff returns for 91 yards, averaging 22.8 yards per return. Their longest kickoff return was 29 yards.
They also had one punt return for 22 yards.
The Rams recorded one kickoff return for 25 yards and two punt returns for 15 total yards.
The return game therefore did not provide the primary reason for the 34-point difference. The more decisive areas were offensive scoring, rushing efficiency, and turnovers.
A Closer Look at the 34-0 Score
A shutout can sometimes make a game appear simpler than it actually was.
The Saints produced 293 combined passing and rushing yards based on the team totals. The Rams produced 405 combined passing and rushing yards.
That creates a 112-yard advantage for Los Angeles.
The bigger difference came in how those yards translated into scoring opportunities.
The Rams had:
- 151 rushing yards
- 3 rushing touchdowns
- 254 passing yards
- 0 interceptions thrown
- 2 defensive interceptions
- 103 interception return yards
- 1 defensive touchdown
- 2 successful field goals
The Saints had:
- 105 rushing yards
- 0 rushing touchdowns
- 188 passing yards
- 2 interceptions thrown
- 1 lost fumble
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 made field goals
This is why the final score was so lopsided. Los Angeles combined offensive production with defensive scoring opportunities, while New Orleans accumulated yardage without finishing drives.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Offensive Execution
The Saints’ numbers provide an interesting distinction between moving the ball and scoring.
New Orleans averaged 5.6 yards per pass attempt and 4.0 yards per rushing attempt. Those figures are not inherently disastrous in isolation.
However, the offense had no touchdowns.
The Saints also threw two interceptions and lost one fumble. That reduced the number of possessions available for sustained scoring drives.
The Rams were not dramatically more explosive through the air. Their 5.9 yards per pass attempt was only slightly higher than New Orleans’ 5.6.
Instead, Los Angeles gained an advantage by combining efficient rushing with ball security and defensive takeaways.
That is a useful lesson when reading player statistics: offensive efficiency cannot be judged by yardage alone. Turnovers, touchdowns, field goals, and possession outcomes matter just as much.
Key Individual Performers
Several players stand out when the statistics are viewed together.
Alex Cook
Cook produced the game’s largest defensive play with a 100-yard interception return touchdown.
That single play generated seven points and was part of Los Angeles’ 103 total interception return yards.
Jarquez Hunter
Hunter led all Rams rushers with 68 yards on 12 carries.
His 5.7-yard average was strong, and his 12-yard run was the longest Rams rushing play listed in the game data.
Stetson Bennett IV
Bennett completed 19 of 31 passes for 181 yards and added two rushing touchdowns.
His 77.5 passer rating was supported by zero interceptions.
CJ Daniels
Daniels led the Rams in receiving with eight catches for 68 yards on 13 targets.
His involvement made him the most frequently targeted Rams receiver in the available statistics.
CJ Donaldson
Donaldson led the Saints in receiving with four catches for 51 yards.
His 32-yard reception was New Orleans’ longest catch of the game.
Spencer Rattler
Rattler led the Saints in passing yardage with 141 yards and also added 21 rushing yards.
His one interception was part of the Saints’ two-turnover passing performance.
What Should Readers Take From Preseason Statistics?
Preseason statistics need to be interpreted differently from regular-season statistics.
Teams use preseason games to evaluate players, combinations, depth, and execution. Playing time can be distributed among several quarterbacks and numerous players competing for roster positions.
That context matters when examining individual totals.
For example, a quarterback who throws for fewer yards may simply have played fewer snaps. A running back with a lower carry total may have been part of a larger rotation. A receiver’s target count can also depend on which quarterback was on the field.
The most useful approach is therefore to examine several categories together rather than treating one box-score number as a complete evaluation.
For this game, the strongest statistical signals are the turnover margin, rushing production, scoring efficiency, and defensive disruption.
Saints vs Rams Statistical Summary
The overall numbers can be summarized in several major areas.
Passing: Los Angeles had 254 yards compared with New Orleans’ 188.
Rushing: Los Angeles had 151 yards compared with New Orleans’ 105.
Total offensive yardage: The Rams held a 405-293 advantage using the supplied passing and rushing totals.
Turnovers: New Orleans committed three turnovers through two interceptions and one lost fumble. Los Angeles committed none.
Rushing touchdowns: Los Angeles scored three. New Orleans scored none.
Defensive touchdowns: Los Angeles scored one on a 100-yard interception return.
Field goals: Los Angeles made both attempts. New Orleans missed its only attempt.
Passing touchdowns: Neither team threw a touchdown pass.
This combination of statistics provides a more complete explanation of the final 34-0 score than any single player statistic.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Saints and Rams?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the New Orleans Saints 34-0 on August 23, 2026, in NFL Preseason Week 2.
Who led the Rams in rushing?
Jarquez Hunter led the Rams with 68 rushing yards on 12 carries. He averaged 5.7 yards per carry and scored one rushing touchdown.
Who led the Saints in passing?
Spencer Rattler led the Saints in passing with 141 yards on 14 completions from 23 attempts. He threw one interception and no touchdowns.
How many turnovers did the Saints have?
The Saints had three turnovers in total: two interceptions and one lost fumble. The Rams did not turn the ball over.
Who had the biggest defensive play?
Alex Cook recorded a 100-yard interception return for a touchdown, the longest defensive scoring play listed in the game statistics.
Did either team throw a touchdown pass?
No. Neither the Saints nor Rams recorded a passing touchdown. Los Angeles scored three rushing touchdowns and one defensive touchdown.
Conclusion
The new orleans saints vs los angeles rams match player stats show that the 34-0 result was built through several connected statistical advantages rather than passing production alone.
Los Angeles finished with 254 passing yards and 151 rushing yards, while New Orleans recorded 188 passing yards and 105 rushing yards. The Rams averaged 5.0 yards per rushing attempt compared with 4.0 for the Saints and scored three rushing touchdowns.
The turnover battle was even more decisive. New Orleans threw two interceptions and lost a fumble, while Los Angeles avoided turnovers and intercepted the Saints twice. Alex Cook turned one of those interceptions into a 100-yard touchdown return.
Stetson Bennett IV supplied 181 passing yards and two rushing touchdowns, while Jarquez Hunter led the Rams’ rushing attack with 68 yards. CJ Daniels led Los Angeles in receiving with eight catches for 68 yards. For New Orleans, Spencer Rattler led the passing game with 141 yards, while CJ Donaldson produced 51 receiving yards.
Taken together, the statistics show a Rams performance that combined ball security, rushing efficiency, defensive disruption, and reliable kicking. The Saints generated 293 combined passing and rushing yards but could not convert that production into points, leaving them scoreless throughout all four quarters.
For anyone researching this preseason matchup, the player-by-player numbers provide a much clearer picture than the final score alone. They show where yardage was produced, how possessions ended, which players created the biggest plays, and why Los Angeles maintained control from the second quarter through the final whistle.
