Oklahoma City Thunder vs Minnesota Timberwolves Match Player Stats
The oklahoma city thunder vs minnesota timberwolves match player stats from Game 2 of the 2025 Western Conference Finals tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Oklahoma City defeated Minnesota 118-103 at Paycom Center, taking a 2-0 series lead behind 38 points from Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, 26 points and 10 rebounds from Jalen Williams, and 22 points from Chet Holmgren. Anthony Edwards led Minnesota with 32 points, while Jaden McDaniels added 22. The official NBA box score lists the game as May 22, 2025 in Oklahoma City, with the league’s recap published May 23. NBA official Game 2 box score and recap
This was not simply a game in which one team shot better. Oklahoma City created a wider margin through ball movement, pressure defense, efficient scoring inside, and far better ball security. The Thunder committed only six turnovers compared with Minnesota’s 14, produced 30 assists against 20, and shot 50% from the field. Minnesota finished at 41.4%.
For anyone researching oklahoma city thunder vs minnesota timberwolves match player stats, the most useful approach is to look beyond points. Shooting efficiency, rebounds, assists, turnovers, free throws, defensive activity, and plus-minus all help explain why individual performances translated differently into the final result.
Oklahoma City Thunder vs Minnesota Timberwolves Match Player Stats
Game 2 was played at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City. The Thunder entered the contest with home-court advantage and protected it with a strong second and third quarter.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring was:
| Quarter | Minnesota Timberwolves | Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Q1 | 25 | 29 |
| Q2 | 25 | 29 |
| Q3 | 21 | 35 |
| Q4 | 32 | 25 |
| Final | 103 | 118 |
The Thunder’s 35-point third quarter was especially important. Oklahoma City entered halftime ahead 58-50 and then expanded the margin to 22 points entering the fourth quarter. Minnesota improved offensively in the final period, but the deficit was too large to erase.
The official game information lists an attendance of 18,203 and identifies Tony Brothers, J.B. DeRosa, Scott Foster, and Pat Fraher as the officials.
How the Thunder Built the 118-103 Win
The simplest explanation is that Oklahoma City consistently generated better offensive possessions while limiting Minnesota’s ability to create efficient offense.
The Thunder made 45 of 90 field-goal attempts. That is exactly 50%. Minnesota made 36 of 87, or 41.4%.
The three-point numbers were not dramatically different. Oklahoma City made 9 of 33 from outside, or 27.3%, while Minnesota made 11 of 39, or 28.2%.
That means three-point shooting alone did not decide the game.
The bigger difference came from overall shot-making, free throws, ball movement, and turnovers.
Oklahoma City scored 19 points from 24 free-throw attempts, while Minnesota scored 20 from 26. The free-throw totals were relatively close.
The decisive advantage was therefore created elsewhere.
Turnovers Were a Major Difference
Minnesota committed 14 turnovers.
Oklahoma City committed only six.
That eight-turnover difference gave the Thunder additional possessions and reduced opportunities for the Timberwolves to build offensive rhythm.
Oklahoma City’s 30 assists also show how effectively the team shared the ball. Minnesota recorded 20 assists.
For a playoff game, that combination is significant. A team does not need to dominate every statistical category when it can repeatedly create clean offensive possessions while protecting the ball.
The Thunder Won the Interior Battle
Oklahoma City produced 58 points in the paint.
Minnesota scored 44.
That 14-point difference mattered because neither team was particularly efficient from three-point range.
The Thunder also had 16 fast-break points compared with nine for Minnesota. Oklahoma City was therefore able to turn defensive pressure and transition opportunities into additional scoring.
The official NBA game summary records those differences along with the 15-point final margin.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s 38-Point Performance
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was the central figure in the Thunder’s offense.
He finished with:
- 38 points
- 3 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 12-for-21 shooting
- 1-for-2 from three-point range
- 13-for-15 from the free-throw line
The 12-for-21 shooting line is particularly important. Gilgeous-Alexander did not need a large volume of three-point attempts to produce his scoring total.
His 13-for-15 free-throw performance was another major component of the offensive output.
He scored 19 points before halftime, helping Oklahoma City establish its eight-point advantage at the break. The NBA’s official recap notes that his performance came immediately after receiving the 2025 MVP trophy.
His eight assists also demonstrate that his contribution was not limited to scoring.
When a primary scorer can produce 38 points while creating opportunities for teammates, the defense has to solve more than one problem.
That was one of the defining features of this game.
Jalen Williams Added 26 Points and 10 Rebounds
Jalen Williams produced one of the most complete statistical performances for Oklahoma City.
His line was:
- 26 points
- 10 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 12-for-20 shooting
- 2-for-6 from three
- 1-for-1 from the free-throw line
- 1 steal
- +17 plus-minus
His 60% field-goal percentage stands out.
Williams was efficient while also contributing on the glass and as a passer. His 10 rebounds gave Oklahoma City another source of possessions and helped the Thunder maintain control of the game.
His +17 plus-minus was also one of the strongest marks among Oklahoma City’s major contributors.
The broader lesson from his performance is that the Thunder did not rely entirely on Gilgeous-Alexander. Williams gave Minnesota another high-level offensive matchup to handle.
Chet Holmgren Provided 22 Points
Chet Holmgren finished with 22 points, four rebounds, and two assists.
He shot 8-for-17 from the field and made 5 of 6 free throws. His three-point shooting was less efficient, as he made one of six attempts from long range.
Even so, Holmgren’s interior scoring helped Oklahoma City maintain its advantage inside.
His size also affected Minnesota’s offensive decisions. He recorded no blocks in the official box score, but the Thunder’s overall defensive structure limited Minnesota to 41.4% shooting.
Holmgren’s value in this game therefore cannot be measured only by blocks.
Lu Dort’s Defensive Contribution
Luguentz Dort scored nine points, grabbed eight rebounds, and recorded four assists.
His offensive numbers were not spectacular, but his role was broader than scoring.
Dort’s defensive responsibilities were important because Minnesota had to generate offense through Anthony Edwards and other primary creators.
The Thunder’s defensive pressure contributed to Minnesota’s inefficient shooting and limited clean offensive possessions.
Dort finished 3-for-9 from the field and 2-for-7 from three-point range. His eight rebounds were useful, particularly for a perimeter defender.
Isaiah Hartenstein’s Efficient Minutes
Isaiah Hartenstein played 26:38 and finished with six points, eight rebounds, and two assists.
He shot 3-for-5 from the field.
His offensive scoring was modest, but his rebounding helped Oklahoma City maintain control of the possession battle.
Hartenstein also contributed a block.
His performance illustrates why playoff box scores should not be interpreted only through scoring totals. A player can have a relatively small scoring role while still contributing meaningfully through rebounding, screening, defense, and second-chance opportunities.
Alex Caruso and Cason Wallace
Alex Caruso scored nine points on 4-for-7 shooting, including 1-for-3 from three-point range.
He also recorded two rebounds, two assists, two steals, and one turnover.
Cason Wallace added eight points, three rebounds, and four assists. He shot 3-for-7 overall and made two of six three-point attempts.
Wallace also played an important role in the third quarter. The official NBA recap highlights his lob to Holmgren for a fast-break dunk during Oklahoma City’s decisive run.
Those plays matter because they show how Oklahoma City’s offense was not dependent on one player creating every possession.
Anthony Edwards Led Minnesota With 32 Points
Anthony Edwards was Minnesota’s leading scorer with 32 points.
His complete line was:
- 32 points
- 9 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 12-for-26 shooting
- 1-for-9 from three
- 7-for-10 from the free-throw line
- 1 block
- 0 turnovers
- -22 plus-minus
The scoring total looks impressive, and it was. Edwards carried a large offensive burden for Minnesota.
But the efficiency provides additional context.
He needed 26 field-goal attempts to reach 32 points and made only one of nine three-point attempts.
His overall field-goal percentage was 46.2%, which is respectable, but his three-point shooting was a major weakness in this particular game.
The zero turnovers were a positive. So were the nine rebounds and six assists.
However, the -22 plus-minus indicates that Minnesota struggled significantly during his minutes compared with Oklahoma City’s overall performance.
The important point is not that Edwards played poorly. His 32 points were a major contribution. Rather, Minnesota needed more efficient production around him to turn that individual scoring into a competitive team result.
Jaden McDaniels Was Extremely Efficient
Jaden McDaniels had one of Minnesota’s strongest offensive games.
He scored 22 points on 8-for-15 shooting.
He also made four of eight three-point attempts and both of his free throws.
That gave him a 53.3% field-goal percentage and a 50% three-point percentage.
McDaniels added two rebounds and three blocks.
His scoring was particularly useful because it reduced some of the pressure on Edwards.
However, he had no assists, and Minnesota still struggled to match Oklahoma City’s overall offensive efficiency.
The official box score confirms McDaniels’ 22-point performance and 53.3% shooting.
Nickeil Alexander-Walker Added 17 Points
One important correction is necessary when examining the supplied player data.
Nickeil Alexander-Walker, not Donte DiVincenzo, scored 17 points for Minnesota in the official NBA box score.
Alexander-Walker finished 5-for-8 from the field, 3-for-4 from three-point range, and 4-for-4 at the free-throw line.
That is an excellent shooting performance.
He scored 17 points in 25:24 and also recorded two assists and two rebounds.
His 75% three-point shooting was one of Minnesota’s most efficient perimeter performances.
DiVincenzo, by contrast, scored eight points on 3-for-8 shooting in the official box score.
This distinction is important for anyone using the article as a statistical reference.
Julius Randle Struggled to Find His Shot
Julius Randle finished with:
- 6 points
- 5 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 2-for-11 shooting
- 0-for-3 from three
- 2-for-2 free throws
- 1 steal
- 4 turnovers
His five assists were useful, but the shooting performance hurt Minnesota’s offense.
A 2-for-11 shooting night meant that Minnesota was asking Edwards and other players to compensate for a major scoring shortfall.
Randle’s four turnovers were also notable because Minnesota already finished with 14 turnovers as a team.
The problem was therefore not simply that Randle missed shots. His inefficient shooting combined with turnovers reduced the number of productive possessions Minnesota could generate.
Rudy Gobert’s 9 Rebounds
Rudy Gobert scored five points and grabbed nine rebounds.
He shot 2-for-5 from the field and recorded one assist and one block.
His nine rebounds helped Minnesota remain competitive on the glass.
However, the Timberwolves did not turn their overall rebounding advantage into enough second-chance scoring.
Minnesota finished with 13 offensive rebounds and 41 total rebounds.
Oklahoma City had nine offensive rebounds and 42 total rebounds.
That is an important statistical detail because it shows the Thunder did not win simply by dominating the boards.
Instead, Oklahoma City’s advantage came from what happened after possessions were secured.
Mike Conley’s Quiet Offensive Night
Mike Conley scored three points on 1-for-6 shooting.
He added three rebounds and three assists.
His 3-point attempt volume was limited, and he made one of four attempts from outside.
For a team trying to keep pace with Oklahoma City’s offensive output, additional efficient guard scoring would have helped.
Conley’s three assists were useful, but his scoring contribution was limited.
Team Comparison
The full team statistics reveal why the 15-point margin developed.
| Category | Timberwolves | Thunder |
| Points | 103 | 118 |
| Field Goals | 36-87 | 45-90 |
| FG Percentage | 41.4% | 50.0% |
| 3-Pointers | 11-39 | 9-33 |
| 3PT Percentage | 28.2% | 27.3% |
| Free Throws | 20-26 | 19-24 |
| FT Percentage | 76.9% | 79.2% |
| Rebounds | 41 | 42 |
| Assists | 20 | 30 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 6 |
| Steals | 2 | 9 |
| Blocks | 7 | 3 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 13 | 9 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 28 | 33 |
One of the most interesting parts of the table is the three-point shooting.
Minnesota actually made more three-pointers than Oklahoma City.
The Timberwolves made 11.
The Thunder made nine.
Yet Oklahoma City won by 15.
That immediately tells us that this was not a simple three-point shooting contest.
The Thunder’s 50% overall field-goal shooting, 30 assists, six turnovers, 58 points in the paint, and 16 fast-break points collectively explain much more of the result.
Why the Third Quarter Changed the Game
The third quarter deserves special attention when studying the oklahoma city thunder vs minnesota timberwolves match player stats.
Minnesota scored only 21 points in the third.
Oklahoma City scored 35.
That created a 14-point quarter advantage.
The Thunder entered the second half with an eight-point lead. By the end of the third quarter, that lead had grown to 22.
The sequence demonstrated the value of sustained defensive pressure.
Oklahoma City forced Minnesota into difficult offensive possessions while continuing to create scoring opportunities through drives, transition play, and ball movement.
Gilgeous-Alexander was a major part of that push, but the run involved multiple players.
Holmgren’s interior finishing, Williams’ scoring and rebounding, and contributions from Wallace and Hartenstein helped Oklahoma City build separation.
What the Shooting Numbers Really Say
A basic reading of the box score might focus on 50% versus 41.4% field-goal shooting.
That is already a major difference, but there is more beneath it.
Minnesota attempted 87 field goals.
Oklahoma City attempted 90.
So the Thunder did not simply shoot more frequently.
They converted a much larger share of their attempts.
The teams were also close at the free-throw line.
The difference was therefore heavily connected to shot quality and overall offensive execution.
Oklahoma City’s 58 points in the paint compared with Minnesota’s 44.
That 14-point interior scoring advantage matches the final margin.
This does not mean every point came directly from paint scoring, but it shows where Oklahoma City consistently found productive opportunities.
Ball Movement Was Another Defining Factor
The Thunder recorded 30 assists.
Minnesota recorded 20.
That 10-assist difference is substantial.
Oklahoma City had several players capable of initiating offense, including Gilgeous-Alexander and Williams.
That made it harder for Minnesota to focus its defensive attention on one creator.
The Thunder also committed only six turnovers.
When a team creates 30 assists while committing six turnovers, its offensive possessions are generally producing a high level of value.
Minnesota’s 14 turnovers created the opposite problem.
Fourteen turnovers mean fewer shot attempts and more chances for the opponent to attack before the defense is fully established.
The Plus-Minus Context
Plus-minus should not be used as a standalone measure of player quality, but it can help explain how the game unfolded.
For Minnesota, Edwards finished at -22 and DiVincenzo at -27.
For Oklahoma City, Jalen Williams finished at +17.
The numbers reflect the team’s overall success during different lineups and stretches.
They do not mean that one player’s entire performance can be summarized by one number.
For example, Edwards scored 32 points, grabbed nine rebounds, and added six assists while committing no turnovers.
His -22 reflects the scoreboard during his minutes rather than simply his individual offensive contribution.
That distinction is important when evaluating playoff player statistics responsibly.
What the Matchup Revealed About Both Teams
The game provided several useful tactical lessons.
Oklahoma City’s Offensive Depth
The Thunder had three players reach at least 22 points:
- Shai Gilgeous-Alexander: 38
- Jalen Williams: 26
- Chet Holmgren: 22
That gave Minnesota three major scoring problems.
The Thunder also had Caruso, Dort, Wallace, and Hartenstein contributing in different ways.
Minnesota’s Dependence on High-Level Shot Creation
Edwards scored 32, but he needed 26 field-goal attempts.
McDaniels supplied 22 efficient points, and Alexander-Walker added 17.
Still, the team did not receive enough efficient scoring from every important rotation piece.
Randle’s six points on 2-for-11 shooting were particularly difficult to overcome.
Minnesota Could Still Create Second Chances
The Timberwolves grabbed 13 offensive rebounds.
That is a strong number.
They also had seven blocks.
Those statistics demonstrate that Minnesota was not completely overwhelmed in every area.
The issue was converting enough of those advantages into sustained offensive efficiency.
Oklahoma City Thunder vs Minnesota Timberwolves Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The most important findings from the oklahoma city thunder vs minnesota timberwolves match player stats are not limited to the leading scorers.
The game can be understood through five major statistical differences:
- Field-goal efficiency: Oklahoma City shot 50%, while Minnesota shot 41.4%.
- Ball security: Oklahoma City committed six turnovers, compared with 14 for Minnesota.
- Assists: The Thunder recorded 30 assists against Minnesota’s 20.
- Interior scoring: Oklahoma City scored 58 points in the paint, compared with 44.
- Third-quarter production: Oklahoma City outscored Minnesota 35-21 in the third quarter.
These factors worked together.
The Thunder did not need to dominate three-point shooting because their overall offensive efficiency and ball movement created enough advantages elsewhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Thunder and Timberwolves in Game 2?
The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves 118-103 in Game 2 of the 2025 Western Conference Finals. Oklahoma City took a 2-0 series lead.
Who scored the most points in the game?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led all scorers with 38 points. He also recorded eight assists and shot 12-for-21 from the field.
How many points did Anthony Edwards score?
Anthony Edwards scored 32 points for Minnesota. He also had nine rebounds and six assists while shooting 12-for-26 from the field.
Who led the Thunder in rebounds?
Jalen Williams led Oklahoma City with 10 rebounds. He also scored 26 points and recorded five assists.
How many turnovers did each team have?
Minnesota committed 14 turnovers, while Oklahoma City committed only six.
What was the Thunder’s field-goal percentage?
Oklahoma City shot 50% from the field, making 45 of 90 attempts. Minnesota made 36 of 87 attempts for 41.4%.
Conclusion
The oklahoma city thunder vs minnesota timberwolves match player stats from Game 2 show why a final score should always be examined alongside the underlying numbers.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s 38 points were the headline performance, but Oklahoma City’s victory was a collective result. Jalen Williams added 26 points and 10 rebounds, Chet Holmgren scored 22, and the Thunder received useful contributions across the rotation.
Minnesota had strong individual performances as well. Anthony Edwards produced 32 points, nine rebounds, and six assists. Jaden McDaniels scored 22 points on efficient shooting, while Nickeil Alexander-Walker contributed 17 points on 5-for-8 shooting.
The largest differences came from team execution. Oklahoma City shot 50% overall, recorded 30 assists, committed only six turnovers, scored 58 points in the paint, and produced a decisive 35-point third quarter.
Minnesota’s 13 offensive rebounds and 11 made three-pointers show that the Timberwolves had areas of success. However, the combination of 14 turnovers, 41.4% shooting, and a 21-point third quarter created too large a gap to overcome.
The official box score is therefore more informative when viewed as a complete statistical picture rather than as a list of scoring totals.
