The Detroit Pistons vs Washington Wizards match player stats reveal how Washington secured a 114-108 overtime victory over Detroit in an NBA preseason matchup played at Capital One Arena. The game featured contrasting offensive approaches, strong individual performances, a major difference in free-throw production, and a defensive effort from Washington that helped the team overcome Detroit’s advantage in assists and steals.

According to the supplied ESPN box-score data, Washington finished with 114 points while Detroit recorded 108. The Wizards shot 46% from the field, compared with the Pistons’ 37%, and earned 51 free-throw attempts. Detroit, meanwhile, collected 50 rebounds and recorded 30 assists, showing that the team created scoring opportunities but struggled to convert enough of its shots.

Several performances stand out from the individual statistics. Ebuka Okorie led Detroit’s listed scorers with 14 points and six assists, while Daniss Jenkins and Duncan Robinson each contributed 12 points. For Washington, Will Riley and Tre Johnson scored 15 points apiece, and AJ Dybantsa and Kyshawn George each added 14. Anthony Davis contributed 11 rebounds, while Trae Young recorded eight assists despite scoring only two points.

The result offers a useful look at individual production, shooting efficiency, defensive activity, and late-game execution. However, the supplied information contains a date discrepancy: the ESPN page title lists October 10, 2026, while its game information section lists October 11, 2026. This article preserves that distinction rather than treating the two dates as identical.

Detroit Pistons vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup took place at Capital One Arena in Washington, DC, with an attendance of 10,791 listed in the supplied game information. The contest ended in overtime, with the Wizards outscoring the Pistons 16-10 in the extra period.

Watch LIVE Wizards Games

Washington Wizards

Home team

114

Final

OT

File:Logo of the Detroit Pistons.svg – Wikimedia Commons

Detroit Pistons

Away team

108

Venue: Capital One Arena, Washington, DC

Attendance: 10,791 | Competition: NBA preseason

Source: ESPN official box score

Final score by quarter

Period	Detroit Pistons	Washington Wizards
First quarter	20	40
Second quarter	30	16
Third quarter	28	24
Fourth quarter	20	18
Overtime	10	16
Final score	108	114

Washington’s 40-point opening quarter created an early advantage, but Detroit responded with a 30-point second quarter. The Pistons also outscored Washington 28-24 in the third period and 20-18 in the fourth.

The overtime figures explain the final separation. Detroit scored 10 points in the extra period, while Washington produced 16. The six-point difference in overtime matched the final margin of victory.

Because this was a preseason contest, the result should be interpreted as a snapshot of player performances and team execution rather than a definitive measure of regular-season strength.

Team Statistics Comparison

The overall numbers show that Detroit generated more assists, rebounds, offensive rebounds, and steals. Washington’s advantage came from shooting accuracy, free-throw opportunities, and rim protection.

Team statistic	Detroit Pistons	Washington Wizards
Points	108	114
Field goals	39/106	33/71
Field-goal percentage	37%	46%
Three-pointers	12/48	10/32
Three-point percentage	25%	31%
Free throws	18/25	38/51
Free-throw percentage	72%	75%
Total rebounds	50	49
Offensive rebounds	23	9
Defensive rebounds	27	40
Assists	30	25
Turnovers	20	27
Steals	16	10
Blocks	2	10
Personal fouls	36	23

1. Washington made its shots count

The Wizards converted 33 of 71 field-goal attempts, while Detroit made 39 of 106. Detroit attempted 35 more field goals but made only six additional baskets.

This is one of the clearest explanations for the result. Washington converted a larger share of its opportunities, allowing the team to remain competitive without matching Detroit’s total shot volume.

Detroit’s 37% shooting percentage was a significant weakness. The Pistons managed 12 three-pointers from 48 attempts, meaning they missed 36 shots from beyond the arc alone. Their overall shooting figures suggest that increasing shot quality would have been more valuable than simply creating additional attempts.

Washington’s 46% field-goal percentage was considerably stronger. The Wizards also made 10 three-pointers on 32 attempts, giving them a 31% success rate from long range.

2. Free throws created a major scoring gap

Washington attempted 51 free throws and made 38. Detroit attempted 25 and converted 18.

That produced a difference of 20 made free throws, worth 20 points. Washington’s 75% accuracy was only slightly better than Detroit’s 72%, so the main difference was the number of attempts rather than dramatically different conversion rates.

This distinction matters when analyzing basketball box scores. A team can have a respectable free-throw percentage but still lose the overall scoring battle if it reaches the line far less often.

The supplied figures do not establish exactly why Washington attempted so many more free throws. Drawing fouls, defensive positioning, and the specific sequence of possessions can all affect free-throw volume. A play-by-play review would be needed to assign the difference to particular actions or players.

3. Detroit controlled the offensive glass

The Pistons collected 23 offensive rebounds, compared with nine for the Wizards. Detroit therefore secured 14 more offensive rebounds.

That advantage created opportunities to recover missed shots and extend possessions. However, the Pistons’ 37% overall field-goal percentage shows that extra opportunities did not translate into efficient scoring.

Washington collected 40 defensive rebounds, which helped the team limit the damage from Detroit’s offensive-rebounding advantage. The Wizards also recorded 10 blocks, compared with Detroit’s two.

Together, these figures point to a useful contrast: Detroit recovered more of its misses, while Washington produced more defensive stops through shot-blocking and defensive rebounding.

4. Turnovers and steals tell a different story

Detroit recorded 16 steals and committed 20 turnovers. Washington recorded 10 steals but committed 27 turnovers.

The Pistons had a seven-turnover advantage, and their six additional steals indicate greater activity in disrupting Washington’s possession flow.

However, the Wizards still won. This illustrates why a single category rarely explains a basketball result. Washington’s better shooting, substantial free-throw advantage, and eight-block lead offset Detroit’s superior ball pressure.

The figures also show that neither team was particularly clean with possession. Washington’s 27 turnovers were especially costly, although the available team totals alone cannot establish how many directly led to Detroit points.

Detroit Pistons Player Stats

Detroit’s listed performances included efficient scoring from Daniss Jenkins, a productive rebounding contribution from Tolu Smith, and outside shooting from Duncan Robinson and Kevin Huerter. The figures below reproduce the supplied player statistics.

Detroit Pistons starting lineup

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK
Duncan Robinson	19	12	2	4	0	0
John Collins	17	2	2	0	0	0
Paul Reed	21	11	9	3	2	0
Ausar Thompson	15	2	1	2	3	1
Daniss Jenkins	18	12	0	4	0	0

Detroit Pistons bench players

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK
Tolu Smith	16	6	13	2	1	0
Ronald Holland II	13	8	3	0	0	0
Javonte Green	14	7	6	1	2	0
Kevin Huerter	18	11	2	3	1	0
Isaiah Joe	17	5	2	1	0	1
Chaz Lanier	17	9	0	0	0	0
Ebuka Okorie	27	14	1	6	1	0

The supplied player list also names Taurean Prince, Brice Williams, John Ukomadu, Isaac Jones, Elijah Harkless, Jalen Duren, Ugonna Onyenso, and Cade Cunningham among Detroit’s bench players. Individual statistical lines for these players were not clearly included in the supplied data, so their figures cannot be reliably reported here.

Ebuka Okorie: Detroit’s leading listed scorer

Ebuka Okorie finished with 14 points, six assists, one rebound, and one steal in 27 minutes. He made six of 15 field-goal attempts and two of two free throws.

His six assists were the highest among Detroit’s listed players. That combination of scoring and playmaking made his contribution particularly relevant in a game where Detroit recorded 30 team assists.

Okorie’s three-point shooting was less successful: he missed all four attempts from beyond the arc. His overall field-goal percentage was 40%, and his three turnovers show that his involvement in the offense also came with some possession risk.

Even with those limitations, 14 points and six assists represented a productive statistical line. The most useful takeaway is that his impact was not limited to scoring.

Daniss Jenkins: Efficient scoring in limited minutes

Jenkins scored 12 points in 18 minutes, making four of six field goals and three of five three-point attempts. He also recorded four assists and only one turnover.

His 66.7% field-goal accuracy and 60% three-point accuracy were among the more efficient shooting figures in Detroit’s listed rotation. The three made three-pointers were particularly important because the Pistons collectively struggled from long range.

Jenkins’ line illustrates how a player can make a meaningful scoring contribution without taking a large number of shots. His four assists also indicate that he contributed to teammates’ scoring opportunities.

The sample is small, however. A single preseason performance does not establish how consistently a player will shoot at that level across a full season.

Duncan Robinson: Outside shooting and playmaking

Robinson recorded 12 points, two rebounds, and four assists in 19 minutes. He made four of nine field goals, including two of six from three-point range.

His 44.4% overall shooting was better than Detroit’s team figure of 37%. However, his 33.3% three-point accuracy was close to the Wizards’ team rate and below what his team needed to overcome its overall shooting problems.

Robinson’s four assists also added value beyond perimeter scoring. His performance shows why a shooting specialist’s contribution should be assessed through both shot conversion and involvement in the offense.

Paul Reed: Rebounding and defensive activity

Reed recorded 11 points, nine rebounds, three assists, and two steals in 21 minutes. He made four of eight field goals and three of four free throws.

His nine rebounds placed him among Detroit’s most productive players on the glass. He also contributed defensively with two steals, matching the highest total among the Pistons’ listed individual lines.

Reed’s performance fits into the broader team picture. Detroit secured 50 rebounds and 23 offensive boards, and his work on the glass contributed to that effort. Still, the team’s poor shooting meant its rebounding advantage was not enough to produce a win.

Tolu Smith: A standout rebounding contribution

Smith recorded 13 rebounds in 16 minutes, along with six points and two assists. He made two of five field goals and both of his free throws.

His 13 rebounds were the highest total among the Detroit players with supplied individual statistics. The pace of his rebounding production was especially notable given his limited minutes.

That number should be interpreted carefully because preseason rotations and playing time can differ substantially from regular-season patterns. Even so, the line highlights his ability to contribute on possessions that do not end in a shot attempt or an assist.

Kevin Huerter: A useful perimeter contribution

Huerter scored 11 points in 18 minutes, making three of seven field goals and three of six three-point attempts. He also recorded two rebounds, three assists, and one steal.

His 50% accuracy from three-point range was well above Detroit’s team average of 25%. Huerter therefore provided one of the more effective perimeter-scoring performances among the Pistons’ listed players.

His three assists also supported Detroit’s ball movement. However, one player’s efficient shooting could not fully offset the team’s broader struggles from the field.

Ausar Thompson: Defensive activity despite shooting struggles

Thompson finished with two points, one rebound, two assists, three steals, and one block in 15 minutes. He made one of seven field-goal attempts.

His offensive production was limited, but the three steals were notable. They reflected a contribution in defensive disruption even as his shooting struggled.

This is an important distinction when evaluating individual box scores. Scoring totals alone do not capture steals, blocks, rebounding, or playmaking. Thompson’s overall line was uneven, but his defensive statistics should not be ignored.

Additional Detroit contributions

• Ronald Holland II: Eight points and three rebounds in 13 minutes. He made three of seven field goals.
• Javonte Green: Seven points and six rebounds in 14 minutes, with two steals. His listed plus/minus was +17.
• Chaz Lanier: Nine points, including three three-pointers, in 17 minutes.
• Isaiah Joe: Five points, two rebounds, and one block. He struggled from the field, making two of 11 attempts.

These performances reveal a mixed offensive picture. Several players supplied useful scoring bursts, but some of Detroit’s perimeter options struggled to convert their attempts.

Washington Wizards Player Stats

Washington’s box score featured balanced scoring from its younger players and useful contributions from its experienced players. Will Riley and Tre Johnson led the listed scorers with 15 points apiece, while Kyshawn George and AJ Dybantsa added 14 each.

Washington Wizards starting lineup

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK
Anthony Davis	22	10	11	4	1	2
AJ Dybantsa	23	14	7	2	1	0
Kyshawn George	23	14	3	0	1	3
Alex Sarr	20	8	1	0	0	1
Trae Young	23	2	2	8	0	0

Washington Wizards bench players

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK
Justin Champagnie	17	12	3	1	3	0
Chris Livingston	11	4	1	0	0	0
Felix Okpara	17	8	5	1	2	2
Deandre Ayton	15	4	6	1	0	0
Reece Beekman	11	0	0	2	0	0
Bub Carrington	18	5	0	1	0	1
Bilal Coulibaly	20	3	4	1	1	0
Will Riley	24	15	4	3	1	1
Tre Johnson	19	15	2	1	0	0

The supplied roster also lists Khris Middleton, Anthony Gill, Tristan Vukcevic, Skal Labissiere, Trevor Keels, Tre Mann, and Jamir Watkins among Washington’s bench players. Their individual statistical lines were not clearly provided, so their numbers are not included in the table.

Will Riley: One of Washington’s leading scorers

Riley finished with 15 points, four rebounds, three assists, one steal, and one block in 24 minutes. He made three of seven field goals and one of three three-point attempts, while converting all eight of his free throws.

His perfect free-throw shooting was particularly valuable. Riley scored eight of his 15 points at the line, demonstrating how free throws can make up a large part of a player’s total even when the player does not make many field goals.

Riley’s contribution also extended beyond scoring. Four rebounds, three assists, a steal, and a block show activity in several areas of the game.

His listed plus/minus was +4, meaning Washington outscored Detroit by four points during his time on the court. Plus/minus is a team-based measure and does not prove that a player individually caused that scoring difference.

Tre Johnson: Perimeter scoring that supported Washington

Johnson scored 15 points in 19 minutes, making five of nine field goals and four of six three-point attempts. He also converted his only free-throw attempt.

His four made three-pointers were the highest total among Washington’s supplied individual player lines. At 66.7% from three-point range, he delivered an efficient perimeter-scoring performance.

The distinction between Johnson’s contribution and Detroit’s overall three-point shooting is important. Johnson made four of six attempts, while the Pistons converted 12 of 48. Although individual and team figures should not be treated as a complete explanation of the result, his accuracy helped Washington get more value from its perimeter opportunities.

Johnson also recorded two rebounds and one assist without a turnover in his listed line. His 15 points in 19 minutes made him one of the most productive scorers in the supplied Washington statistics.

AJ Dybantsa: Scoring and rebounding balance

Dybantsa recorded 14 points, seven rebounds, two assists, and one steal in 23 minutes. He made four of 10 field goals and six of 10 free throws.

His seven rebounds were a useful contribution from a scoring player, helping Washington maintain a balanced approach. However, his free-throw accuracy was 60%, leaving four attempts unconverted.

Dybantsa’s performance was therefore productive without being flawless. His scoring and rebounding helped Washington, but his shooting percentages also show why points and efficiency should be evaluated together.

Kyshawn George: Defensive impact and free-throw accuracy

George finished with 14 points, three rebounds, one steal, and three blocks in 23 minutes. He made three of four field goals and all eight of his free throws.

His 75% field-goal accuracy and perfect free-throw shooting made his scoring efficient. The three blocks were equally noteworthy, representing the highest individual block total among the supplied player lines.

George’s performance connects directly to Washington’s team defensive numbers. The Wizards recorded 10 blocks overall, compared with Detroit’s two. George’s three blocks formed a meaningful part of that total.

He also finished with three turnovers, a reminder that an effective performance can still include areas for improvement.

Anthony Davis: Rebounding and interior defense

Davis recorded 10 points, 11 rebounds, four assists, one steal, and two blocks in 22 minutes. He made three of eight field goals and four of six free throws.

His 11 rebounds were the highest total among Washington’s listed players. He also contributed two blocks, giving the Wizards a combination of rebounding and rim protection.

Davis attempted only one three-pointer and did not make it. His strongest statistical contributions came closer to the basket and through general playmaking.

The combination of 11 rebounds, four assists, and two blocks shows a broader contribution than scoring alone. Nevertheless, he also committed five turnovers, so his line contained both positive production and possession-related weaknesses.

Trae Young: Playmaking despite limited scoring

Young recorded two points, two rebounds, and eight assists in 23 minutes. He made one of four field goals and missed both three-point attempts.

His eight assists were the highest total among Washington’s listed players. That output helped support a team that finished with 25 assists.

Young’s performance illustrates why scoring totals can be misleading when used in isolation. A primary playmaker can contribute through passing and the creation of scoring opportunities even when his own shot is not falling.

However, he also committed five turnovers. His assist production was valuable, but the turnovers reduced the efficiency of his possession management.

Justin Champagnie and Felix Okpara: Bench energy

Champagnie recorded 12 points, three rebounds, one assist, and three steals in 17 minutes. He made four of eight field goals and two of six three-point attempts.

Okpara scored eight points, collected five rebounds, recorded two assists, and blocked two shots in 17 minutes. He made all three of his field-goal attempts, including his only three-point attempt.

Their contributions demonstrate two different forms of bench production. Champagnie supplied scoring and defensive pressure, while Okpara provided efficient finishing, rebounding, and rim protection.

Both were useful in a game where Washington received meaningful production from several players rather than relying on one scorer.

Alex Sarr, Deandre Ayton, and other contributors

Sarr recorded eight points, one rebound, and one block in 20 minutes. He made three of five field goals and one of three three-point attempts.

Ayton contributed four points and six rebounds in 15 minutes, although he did not make a field goal in his one listed attempt. He converted four of six free throws.

Other bench contributions included five points from Bub Carrington, four from Chris Livingston, and three from Bilal Coulibaly. Reece Beekman did not score but recorded two assists.

These individual lines should be understood in the context of a preseason rotation. Playing time, role experimentation, and limited minutes can affect both raw totals and shooting percentages.

The Statistical Factors That Decided the Game

The final result becomes easier to understand when individual performances are connected to the team’s overall numbers.

Shooting efficiency outweighed Detroit’s shot volume

Detroit attempted 106 field goals, compared with Washington’s 71. Despite the additional attempts, Detroit scored only six more field goals.

Using the supplied makes and attempts, Detroit’s effective field-goal percentage was approximately 42.5%, while Washington’s was approximately 53.5%.

Effective field-goal percentage accounts for the additional value of a three-point basket. The calculation is:

\[ eFG\%=\frac{FGM+0.5(3PM)}{FGA}\times100 \]

This measure is useful because a three-pointer is worth more than a two-point field goal. It gives a clearer picture of shooting efficiency than ordinary field-goal percentage alone.

The calculation suggests Washington extracted substantially more scoring value from its field-goal attempts. Detroit’s extra attempts did not compensate for its lower accuracy.

Washington’s free-throw advantage was decisive

The Wizards made 38 free throws, while the Pistons made 18. That is a difference of 20 made shots from the line.

This gap was larger than the six-point final margin. It does not mean free throws alone explain every aspect of the game, but it highlights how much Washington benefited from reaching the line.

Detroit’s 36 personal fouls compared with Washington’s 23 also reflect a substantial difference in the team foul totals. The supplied data does not identify which fouls led to specific free throws, so a precise possession-by-possession explanation would require the play-by-play record.

Detroit’s rebounding advantage did not translate into a win

Detroit won the total-rebound battle 50-49 and had a 23-9 advantage in offensive rebounds.

Normally, extra possessions from offensive rebounds can be a significant advantage. But those possessions are most valuable when they produce efficient shots, free throws, or additional opportunities that lead to points.

Detroit’s 37% field-goal shooting and 25% three-point shooting suggest the team struggled to convert enough of its chances. Washington’s 10 blocks also helped disrupt Detroit’s attempts near the basket.

The lesson is not that rebounding was unimportant. Rather, rebounding and shooting must work together for a team to maximize its offensive production.

Washington protected the rim more effectively

The Wizards blocked 10 shots, five times Detroit’s two blocks. George, Davis, and Okpara combined for seven of Washington’s blocks in the supplied individual lines.

Shot-blocking can change the outcome of a possession even when it does not directly create a turnover. A blocked shot may prevent a basket, alter an opponent’s next attempt, or force a team to reset its offense.

However, blocks do not measure all defensive activity. Positioning, contested shots, defensive rebounds, and forced passes can also matter. Washington’s advantage in blocks is a strong statistical signal, but not a complete measure of defensive quality.

Turnovers kept Detroit competitive

Detroit committed 20 turnovers, while Washington committed 27. This seven-turnover advantage gave the Pistons a relative strength in possession management.

The Pistons also recorded 16 steals, six more than Washington. These numbers suggest Detroit was effective at disrupting the Wizards’ possessions, even though it did not convert that defensive activity into a victory.

A full evaluation would compare points scored off turnovers, transition opportunities, and the timing of those turnovers. The team totals provided here do not supply those details, so claims about exact points gained or lost from turnovers would be speculative.

What the Overtime Finish Tells Us

Washington’s 16-10 overtime advantage settled a game in which Detroit had recovered from a poor opening period.

The Wizards scored 40 points in the first quarter, establishing a strong early lead. Detroit responded by winning the second quarter 30-16, then outscored Washington in the third and fourth periods as well.

The progression shows that the final result was not simply the consequence of Washington dominating every phase. Detroit repeatedly narrowed the scoring gap, but the supplied period totals show that Washington produced six more points when the game reached overtime.

The late-game outcome also reinforces the importance of converting possessions. Detroit’s overall shooting percentage was lower, and the team had a much smaller free-throw total. Those differences remained relevant even after the Pistons competed through the middle and later stages of regulation.

Without a verified play-by-play account, it would be inappropriate to attribute the overtime result to one specific player, coaching decision, or tactical adjustment. The strongest supported conclusion is that Washington scored more effectively overall and outscored Detroit in the extra period.

How to Read These Player Statistics Correctly

A useful box-score analysis should go beyond ranking players by points.

Here are five practical ways to interpret this matchup.

1. Compare points with shooting attempts. A player who scores 12 points on six shots has a different scoring profile from one who needs 15 shots to reach the same total.
2. Check rebounds by type. Offensive rebounds can extend possessions, while defensive rebounds help end opponents’ attacks.
3. Include assists and turnovers. High assist totals can indicate playmaking value, but turnovers show where possession control may be weak.
4. Evaluate defensive contributions. Steals and blocks provide useful evidence, but they should be considered alongside rebounds, fouls, and the broader defensive context.
5. Treat plus/minus carefully. A player’s plus/minus measures the team’s scoring margin while that player is on the floor. It is not a direct measurement of individual skill or proof of personal responsibility for the result.

The same approach applies when comparing preseason and regular-season performances. Preseason games can offer useful clues about shooting, rebounding, and player roles, but the limited sample and changing rotations make strong long-term conclusions unreliable.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Detroit Pistons vs Washington Wizards game?

The Washington Wizards defeated the Detroit Pistons 114-108 after overtime, according to the supplied ESPN box-score data. Washington won the extra period 16-10.

2. Who were the leading scorers in the game?

Will Riley and Tre Johnson led Washington’s listed players with 15 points each. Ebuka Okorie led Detroit’s listed players with 14 points, while Daniss Jenkins and Duncan Robinson each scored 12.

3. Which team had better shooting statistics?

Washington shot 46% from the field and 31% from three-point range. Detroit shot 37% overall and 25% from beyond the arc. Washington also made 38 free throws, compared with Detroit’s 18.

4. Who recorded the most rebounds?

Tolu Smith led Detroit’s listed players with 13 rebounds. Anthony Davis led Washington’s listed players with 11 rebounds. Detroit narrowly won the team rebounding battle, collecting 50 rebounds to Washington’s 49.

5. How did Trae Young perform?

Young recorded two points, eight assists, and two rebounds in 23 minutes. He made one of four field-goal attempts and committed five turnovers. His eight assists were the highest total among Washington’s listed players.

6. When was the game played?

The supplied ESPN page title identifies October 10, 2026, while the game information section lists October 11, 2026. The discrepancy should be retained when citing the game, rather than presenting either date as independently confirmed.

Conclusion

The Detroit Pistons vs Washington Wizards matchup ended with Washington earning a 114-108 overtime victory, supported by more accurate shooting, a significant free-throw advantage, and stronger rim protection. The Wizards shot 46% from the field, made 38 free throws, and recorded 10 blocks. Those advantages helped offset Detroit’s superiority in total rebounds, offensive rebounds, assists, and steals.

Individual performances added depth to the result. Will Riley and Tre Johnson each scored 15 points for Washington, while Kyshawn George contributed 14 points and three blocks. Anthony Davis recorded 11 rebounds, and Trae Young supplied eight assists. For Detroit, Ebuka Okorie scored 14 points and distributed six assists, Daniss Jenkins delivered 12 points on efficient shooting, and Tolu Smith collected 13 rebounds.

The broader statistical lesson is that volume does not always produce efficiency. Detroit attempted more field goals and collected more offensive rebounds, but Washington converted a higher percentage of its shots and created far more free-throw opportunities. The Wizards also won the overtime period by six points, matching the final margin.

Because the game was a preseason contest, its numbers are best used to understand this particular performance rather than to predict an entire season. The supplied date discrepancy should also be acknowledged in any subsequent reporting. Taken together, the box score provides a clear account of how Washington prevailed and which individual contributions shaped the result.