Indianapolis Colts vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats
The indianapolis colts vs los angeles rams match player stats from September 28, 2025, show how the Los Angeles Rams turned strong passing production into a 27-20 win over the Indianapolis Colts. Matthew Stafford delivered 375 passing yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception, while Puka Nacua produced 170 receiving yards on 13 catches.
The Colts also moved the ball effectively through the air. Daniel Jones completed 24 of 33 passes for 262 yards and one touchdown. However, two interceptions became important setbacks against a Rams offense that consistently created explosive plays.
Indianapolis finished with 347 total offensive yards, including 262 passing yards and 85 rushing yards. Los Angeles produced 477 total yards, with 375 passing yards and 102 rushing yards. The 130-yard difference in total offense helps explain why the Rams were able to control the game despite the Colts staying competitive on the scoreboard.
This detailed breakdown examines the individual performances, team statistics, passing numbers, rushing production, receiving efficiency, defensive activity, turnovers, special teams, and quarter-by-quarter scoring from the matchup.
indianapolis colts vs los angeles rams match player stats
The final score was Los Angeles Rams 27, Indianapolis Colts 20 on September 28, 2025.
The Rams entered the game with a 3-1 record and were 2-0 at home. The Colts were also 3-1 overall and entered the matchup with a 1-1 road record.
| Team | Final Score | Passing Yards | Rushing Yards | Total Offensive Yards |
| Los Angeles Rams | 27 | 375 | 102 | 477 |
| Indianapolis Colts | 20 | 262 | 85 | 347 |
The biggest statistical difference was passing production. Los Angeles generated 113 more passing yards than Indianapolis.
The Rams also gained 17 more rushing yards, giving them a 130-yard advantage in total offense.
That difference did not come from an overwhelming rushing performance. Instead, it was primarily driven by Stafford’s efficiency and the Rams’ ability to produce explosive receiving plays.
Matthew Stafford leads the Rams passing attack
Matthew Stafford was the central figure in the Rams’ offensive performance.
He completed 29 of 41 passes for 375 yards, averaging 9.1 yards per attempt. He threw three touchdowns and no interceptions.
His final statistical line included:
- 29 completions
- 41 attempts
- 375 passing yards
- 9.1 yards per attempt
- 3 passing touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 3 sacks for 15 yards
- 71.7 QBR
- 123.5 passer rating
The most important part of Stafford’s performance was the combination of volume and efficiency.
He attempted 41 passes, but the Rams still averaged more than nine yards per attempt. That indicates that the offense was not simply relying on short completions to accumulate yardage.
Los Angeles repeatedly created opportunities for significant gains.
Stafford also avoided the costly turnover that can change the direction of a close NFL game. The Colts recorded three sacks, but they did not intercept him.
That balance allowed the Rams to keep attacking through the passing game.
Daniel Jones produces 262 passing yards for Indianapolis
Daniel Jones completed 24 of 33 passes for 262 yards.
He averaged 7.9 yards per attempt and threw one touchdown. However, he also threw two interceptions.
His passing statistics were:
- 24 completions
- 33 attempts
- 262 passing yards
- 7.9 yards per attempt
- 1 touchdown
- 2 interceptions
- 2 sacks for 14 yards
- 50.5 QBR
- 80.6 passer rating
Jones completed approximately 73 percent of his passes, which shows that the Colts were able to maintain a solid completion rate.
The problem was that completion percentage alone does not tell the entire story.
The two interceptions gave Los Angeles additional opportunities and helped create a major difference in turnover impact.
Indianapolis also had one lost fumble, giving the Colts three total turnovers from interceptions and lost fumbles.
The Rams had one lost fumble and two interceptions, giving them a more favorable turnover margin.
Puka Nacua dominates the receiving statistics
Puka Nacua was the standout receiver in the matchup.
He caught 13 passes for 170 yards and one touchdown on 15 targets.
His average was 13.1 yards per reception, with a long gain of 31 yards.
That workload is especially notable because Nacua accounted for a substantial portion of Stafford’s passing production.
His receiving line:
| Player | Rec. | Yards | Avg. | TD | Long | Targets |
| Puka Nacua | 13 | 170 | 13.1 | 1 | 31 | 15 |
Nacua’s 15 targets represented a major share of the Rams’ passing opportunities.
He was not dependent on one isolated explosive reception. Instead, he consistently contributed throughout the passing game.
That makes his 170-yard performance particularly significant.
Tutu Atwell creates an explosive 88-yard touchdown
Tutu Atwell had one of the most efficient individual performances of the game.
He caught just one pass, but that reception went for 88 yards and a touchdown.
His statistics were:
- 1 reception
- 88 yards
- 88.0 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
- 88-yard long
- 2 targets
This is an excellent example of why receiving volume and receiving impact are not always the same thing.
Nacua generated 13 catches and 170 yards through consistent involvement. Atwell generated 88 yards from a single reception.
The 88-yard touchdown was also the longest offensive play listed in the game data.
Davante Adams adds another touchdown
Davante Adams caught 4 passes for 56 yards and one touchdown.
He received six targets and averaged 14.0 yards per reception.
His contribution gave Stafford another reliable touchdown-producing option.
The Rams therefore had three different players with receiving touchdowns:
- Puka Nacua: 1 touchdown
- Tutu Atwell: 1 touchdown
- Davante Adams: 1 touchdown
That distribution made it difficult for Indianapolis to focus exclusively on one receiver.
Indianapolis receiving production
The Colts had several productive individual performances despite the loss.
Adonai Mitchell led Indianapolis in receiving yards with 96 yards on three receptions.
His longest catch went for 75 yards.
That meant Mitchell averaged 32.0 yards per reception, which was the highest receiving average among Colts players with multiple catches.
His numbers were:
- 3 receptions
- 96 yards
- 32.0 yards per reception
- 0 touchdowns
- 75-yard long
- 4 targets
Tyler Warren also had an important all-around performance.
He caught 5 passes for 70 yards on six targets and added a rushing touchdown.
Michael Pittman Jr. caught five passes for 41 yards and scored Indianapolis’ receiving touchdown.
The Colts’ main receiving numbers were:
| Player | Rec. | Yards | Avg. | TD | Long | Targets |
| Adonai Mitchell | 3 | 96 | 32.0 | 0 | 75 | 4 |
| Tyler Warren | 5 | 70 | 14.0 | 0 | 24 | 6 |
| Michael Pittman Jr. | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 1 | 17 | 10 |
| Josh Downs | 4 | 24 | 6.0 | 0 | 8 | 5 |
| Jonathan Taylor | 5 | 20 | 4.0 | 0 | 10 | 5 |
| Ashton Dulin | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 | 1 |
| Tyler Goodson | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Indianapolis completed 24 passes for 262 yards and one touchdown as a team.
The numbers show that the Colts had explosive receiving potential. Mitchell’s 75-yard long was especially important because it accounted for a large portion of his total production.
Jonathan Taylor provides Indianapolis with a steady rushing presence
Jonathan Taylor led the Colts’ rushing attack.
He carried the ball 17 times for 76 yards, averaging 4.5 yards per carry.
His longest rush was 12 yards.
Taylor did not score a rushing touchdown, but he accounted for most of Indianapolis’ rushing workload.
His rushing statistics were:
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg. | TD | Long |
| Jonathan Taylor | 17 | 76 | 4.5 | 0 | 12 |
| Ashton Dulin | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| Tyler Warren | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 1 | 2 |
| Daniel Jones | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | -1 |
The Colts finished with 21 carries for 85 yards, averaging 4.0 yards per carry.
Taylor’s 76 yards represented nearly 90 percent of the team’s rushing production.
That level of workload demonstrates how central he was to the Colts’ ground game.
Kyren Williams leads the Rams rushing attack
Kyren Williams was the Rams’ leading rusher.
He carried the ball 13 times for 77 yards, averaging 5.9 yards per carry.
His longest run was 11 yards.
Williams also caught three passes for 17 yards, giving him a total of 94 yards from scrimmage.
His rushing performance was slightly more efficient than Taylor’s based on yards per carry, although Taylor had more rushing attempts.
The Rams’ rushing totals were:
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg. | TD | Long |
| Kyren Williams | 13 | 77 | 5.9 | 0 | 11 |
| Blake Corum | 9 | 21 | 2.3 | 0 | 10 |
| Matthew Stafford | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 6 |
Los Angeles finished with 26 rushing attempts for 102 yards.
The Rams averaged 3.9 yards per carry as a team.
Comparing the two running games
The rushing statistics were relatively close.
The Colts recorded:
- 21 carries
- 85 yards
- 4.0 yards per carry
- 1 rushing touchdown
- 12-yard long
The Rams recorded:
- 26 carries
- 102 yards
- 3.9 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
- 11-yard long
Los Angeles had more rushing attempts and more rushing yards, but Indianapolis had the slightly higher average.
This is an important distinction when examining the indianapolis colts vs los angeles rams match player stats.
The Rams did not win because they dramatically outperformed Indianapolis on a per-carry basis.
Their major advantage came through the passing game.
Tyler Warren contributes as both runner and receiver
Tyler Warren provided an interesting two-way contribution for Indianapolis.
He rushed twice for three yards and scored one touchdown.
He also caught five passes for 70 yards.
His combined offensive contribution was therefore 73 yards plus the rushing touchdown.
The rushing touchdown was particularly important because Indianapolis finished with only one rushing score.
Warren’s ability to contribute in different areas gave the Colts another method of moving the ball.
His six receiving targets were also among the highest totals on the team.
Team passing comparison
The passing difference was one of the defining statistics of the game.
| Category | Colts | Rams |
| Completions | 24 | 29 |
| Attempts | 33 | 41 |
| Passing Yards | 262 | 375 |
| Yards per Attempt | 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 0 |
| Sacks | 2 | 3 |
| Sack Yards | 14 | 15 |
| QBR | 50.5 | 71.7 |
| Passer Rating | 80.6 | 123.5 |
Stafford had eight more completions and eight more passing attempts than Jones.
More importantly, he produced 113 additional passing yards and two additional passing touchdowns.
The Rams also avoided interceptions.
That combination created a substantial statistical advantage.
Defensive statistics
The Colts recorded more total tackles, finishing with 83 tackles compared with 64 for the Rams.
Indianapolis also registered three sacks, while Los Angeles had two.
The Colts’ defensive totals included:
- 83 tackles
- 38 solo tackles
- 3 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 9 quarterback hits
The Rams recorded:
- 64 tackles
- 34 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 7 quarterback hits
The tackle difference does not necessarily mean Indianapolis controlled the game defensively.
A team can record many tackles because its defense spends more time responding to completed plays.
The more decisive statistic in this matchup was the interception total.
Kam Curl records two interceptions
Kam Curl had a major impact for Los Angeles by intercepting Daniel Jones twice.
The Rams did not record any other interceptions in the provided data.
Curl finished with:
- 2 interceptions
- 0 return yards
- 0 interception touchdowns
Those two turnovers were among the clearest individual defensive contributions in the game.
They also directly contrasted with Stafford’s zero-interception performance.
Turnovers shape the matchup
Turnovers were an important part of the statistical story.
Indianapolis recorded two team fumbles, with one lost.
Los Angeles recorded one fumble and lost it.
The Colts also threw two interceptions.
The Rams threw none.
That means Indianapolis gave the Rams three turnover opportunities that resulted in lost possessions through two interceptions and one lost fumble.
Los Angeles lost one fumble.
The difference was therefore significant.
When a team combines strong offensive yardage with a positive turnover situation, it can create a considerable advantage without dominating every individual statistical category.
Special teams performance
Special teams also contributed several useful numbers.
Spencer Shrader handled Indianapolis’ kicking duties and made both field-goal attempts.
He also converted both extra-point attempts.
His statistics:
- 2 field goals made on 2 attempts
- 100 percent field-goal accuracy
- 52-yard long
- 2 extra points
- 8 total points
Joshua Karty made both of his field-goal attempts for Los Angeles.
He also converted all three extra-point attempts.
His statistics:
- 2 field goals made on 2 attempts
- 100 percent field-goal accuracy
- 42-yard long
- 3 extra points
- 9 total points
Both kickers were perfect on field goals.
The longest successful field goal came from Shrader at 52 yards.
Kick return statistics
Anthony Gould handled Indianapolis’ kick-return duties.
He returned four kicks for 91 yards, averaging 22.8 yards per return.
His longest return was 38 yards.
The Rams used Xavier Smith and Jordan Whittington on kick returns.
Smith had three returns for 73 yards.
Whittington had two returns for 49 yards.
Together, the Rams recorded:
- 5 returns
- 122 yards
- 24.4 yards per return
- 27-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
The Rams therefore produced more total kick-return yardage than Indianapolis.
Punt return statistics
Anthony Gould also handled Indianapolis’ punt returns.
He returned two punts for 31 yards, averaging 15.5 yards per return.
His longest punt return was 16 yards.
For Los Angeles, Xavier Smith recorded one punt return for zero yards.
That gave Indianapolis the larger individual contribution in the punt-return category.
Punting comparison
Both punters were used four times.
Rigoberto Sanchez punted four times for 209 yards, averaging 52.3 yards per punt.
He had two punts inside the 20-yard line.
Ethan Evans punted four times for 211 yards, averaging 52.8 yards.
He placed three punts inside the 20.
The numbers were very similar, although Evans had one additional punt inside the 20.
Quarter-by-quarter scoring
The game remained competitive across the first three quarters before Los Angeles created separation in the fourth.
| Quarter | Colts | Rams |
| First | 3 | 3 |
| Second | 7 | 10 |
| Third | 0 | 0 |
| Fourth | 10 | 14 |
| Final | 20 | 27 |
Both teams scored three points in the opening quarter.
Los Angeles then added 10 points in the second quarter while Indianapolis scored seven.
Neither team scored in the third quarter.
The fourth quarter became the decisive scoring period.
The Colts scored 10 points, but the Rams scored 14 to secure the seven-point victory.
Why the final score was close despite the yardage gap
A 130-yard difference in total offense might suggest a wider final margin, but the game finished 27-20.
Several factors help explain the narrow score.
First, Indianapolis produced 262 passing yards and had explosive plays through Adonai Mitchell.
Second, the Colts scored 10 points in the fourth quarter, keeping pressure on Los Angeles.
Third, Indianapolis made both of its field-goal attempts.
The Rams, meanwhile, converted their offensive production into three passing touchdowns.
That difference in touchdown production helped Los Angeles maintain the lead.
The most important statistical contrasts
The matchup can be understood through several key comparisons.
Passing production
Los Angeles had 375 passing yards compared with 262 for Indianapolis.
That was a 113-yard advantage.
Passing touchdowns
Stafford threw three touchdowns.
Jones threw one.
This created a two-touchdown advantage for Los Angeles through the air.
Interceptions
Jones threw two interceptions.
Stafford threw none.
This was one of the clearest statistical differences between the quarterbacks.
Rushing yards
The Rams had 102 rushing yards.
The Colts had 85.
Los Angeles held a 17-yard advantage on the ground.
Total offense
The Rams produced 477 total yards.
The Colts produced 347.
Los Angeles therefore generated 130 more offensive yards.
Receiving production
Nacua led all players with 170 receiving yards.
Atwell added 88 yards from one catch.
Mitchell led Indianapolis with 96 yards.
These explosive receiving performances were central to the game.
What the player statistics reveal
The numbers tell a more detailed story than the final score alone.
Los Angeles was much more productive through the air. Stafford’s 375 yards represented the foundation of the Rams’ offensive output.
The Rams also spread their touchdown production across three receivers.
Nacua produced volume.
Atwell produced a single explosive touchdown.
Adams supplied another touchdown and 56 yards.
For Indianapolis, Mitchell produced explosive yardage, while Warren and Pittman provided steady contributions.
The Colts’ offense was not ineffective. It simply did not turn its passing opportunities into touchdowns as consistently as Los Angeles.
The turnover difference was another major factor.
Two interceptions thrown by Jones gave Los Angeles additional possession advantages, while Stafford protected the football through the passing game.
A closer look at offensive efficiency
Yards per attempt provide useful context.
Stafford averaged 9.1 yards per pass attempt.
Jones averaged 7.9.
The 1.2-yard difference may appear small, but across dozens of attempts it becomes meaningful.
Stafford’s 41 attempts at 9.1 yards per attempt helped produce 375 passing yards.
Jones’ 33 attempts at 7.9 yards per attempt produced 262 yards.
The Rams therefore combined more passing volume with higher per-attempt production.
That combination is one of the strongest statistical explanations for the result.
How the receiving workload was distributed
The Rams completed 29 passes to nine different players.
Nacua received 15 targets, the highest total on the team.
Adams received six targets.
Higbee received five.
Kyren Williams received four.
This distribution allowed Stafford to use multiple areas of the field.
The Colts completed 24 passes to seven different players.
Pittman led Indianapolis with 10 targets.
Warren received six targets.
Downs and Taylor each received five.
Mitchell received four targets but turned those opportunities into 96 yards.
The contrast is useful because it shows two different offensive patterns.
The Rams generated both volume and explosive production across multiple players.
Indianapolis relied heavily on a smaller group of primary contributors.
Individual stat leaders
The leading statistical performers from the matchup included:
Passing yards: Matthew Stafford, 375
Passing touchdowns: Matthew Stafford, 3
Rushing yards: Kyren Williams, 77
Receiving yards: Puka Nacua, 170
Receiving touchdowns: Puka Nacua, Tutu Atwell and Davante Adams, 1 each
Longest reception: Tutu Atwell, 88 yards
Colts rushing yards: Jonathan Taylor, 76
Colts receiving yards: Adonai Mitchell, 96
Colts passing yards: Daniel Jones, 262
Interceptions: Kam Curl, 2
Colts field goals: Spencer Shrader, 2 of 2
Rams field goals: Joshua Karty, 2 of 2
Full offensive comparison
| Category | Indianapolis Colts | Los Angeles Rams |
| Passing | 262 yards | 375 yards |
| Rushing | 85 yards | 102 yards |
| Total offense | 347 yards | 477 yards |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Total listed TDs | 2 | 3 |
| Interceptions thrown | 2 | 0 |
| Sacks allowed | 2 | 3 |
| Fumbles | 2 | 1 |
| Fumbles lost | 1 | 1 |
The Rams’ 130-yard total offense advantage was the largest team-level difference.
The Colts did, however, record a rushing touchdown and remained within one score entering the final stages.
Full defensive comparison
| Category | Colts | Rams |
| Total tackles | 83 | 64 |
| Solo tackles | 38 | 34 |
| Sacks | 3 | 2 |
| Tackles for loss | 4 | 4 |
| Passes defended | 4 | 5 |
| QB hits | 9 | 7 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 2 |
The Colts produced more tackles and one more sack.
The Rams produced two interceptions.
This is another example of why defensive statistics should be viewed together rather than through one category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Colts vs Rams game on September 28, 2025?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Indianapolis Colts 27-20 on September 28, 2025.
How many passing yards did Matthew Stafford have?
Matthew Stafford completed 29 of 41 passes for 375 yards, three touchdowns, and zero interceptions.
How many passing yards did Daniel Jones have?
Daniel Jones completed 24 of 33 passes for 262 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions.
Who led the Rams in receiving?
Puka Nacua led the Rams with 13 receptions for 170 yards and one touchdown.
Who led the Colts in rushing?
Jonathan Taylor led Indianapolis with 17 carries for 76 yards.
Who had the most interceptions in the game?
Los Angeles Rams defensive back Kam Curl recorded two interceptions.
Conclusion
The indianapolis colts vs los angeles rams match player stats provide a clear statistical picture of a 27-20 Rams victory.
Los Angeles gained 477 total yards compared with 347 for Indianapolis. The largest difference came through the passing game, where Stafford produced 375 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions.
Puka Nacua was the Rams’ leading receiver with 170 yards and a touchdown. Tutu Atwell added an 88-yard touchdown reception, while Davante Adams also scored through the air.
Indianapolis received strong contributions from Adonai Mitchell, who posted 96 receiving yards, and Jonathan Taylor, who rushed for 76 yards. Tyler Warren added a rushing touchdown and 70 receiving yards.
The defensive numbers also deserve attention. The Colts recorded more tackles and three sacks, but the Rams generated two interceptions through Kam Curl. Those turnovers were particularly important because Stafford avoided throwing an interception.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring shows why the game stayed competitive. Indianapolis scored 10 points in the fourth quarter, but Los Angeles answered with 14 to preserve the seven-point victory.
Overall, the statistical profile shows a Rams offense that generated more passing volume, more explosive receiving production, and more total yardage, while the Colts remained competitive through rushing production, defensive pressure, and late scoring.
