Atlanta Falcons vs Colts Match Player Stats
The atlanta falcons vs colts match player stats from the August 22, 2026 NFL preseason meeting show a clear contrast between Atlanta’s offensive efficiency and Indianapolis’ struggles moving the ball. The Falcons defeated the Colts 34-6 at Lucas Oil Stadium, producing 297 passing yards, 164 rushing yards, and four total touchdowns. Indianapolis managed only 79 passing yards and 85 rushing yards, with its offense failing to score after the opening quarter.
This preseason matchup was more than a simple final-score story. The box score reveals how Atlanta created explosive plays, protected its quarterbacks, established the run, and converted opportunities into points. Indianapolis, meanwhile, struggled to sustain drives and finished without an offensive touchdown.
The official NFL game center records Atlanta’s 34-6 victory and the quarter-by-quarter scoring breakdown. NFL official game center: Falcons at Colts
Atlanta Falcons vs Colts Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game was played on August 22, 2026, as part of the NFL preseason. Atlanta entered the contest 0-1 after its opening preseason game, while Indianapolis had a 0-1-1 record.
Atlanta quickly established control.
The Falcons scored 10 points in the first quarter and added another 14 in the second. They led 24-6 at halftime. Atlanta then added seven points in the third quarter and three in the fourth.
Indianapolis scored all six of its points in the opening quarter. The Colts were held scoreless during the final three quarters.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Atlanta Falcons | 10 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 34 |
| Indianapolis Colts | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
The 28-point winning margin reflected a major difference in offensive production.
Atlanta produced 461 combined yards from passing and rushing. Indianapolis finished with 164 total yards using the supplied team totals.
That 297-yard passing performance gave Atlanta a strong foundation, while the 164 rushing yards added balance. The Colts recorded only 79 passing yards and 85 rushing yards.
Atlanta’s Passing Production
Atlanta’s passing numbers were one of the clearest advantages in the game.
The Falcons completed 22 of 28 passes for 297 yards. They averaged 10.6 yards per pass attempt and recorded one touchdown without throwing an interception.
The team finished with a 122.9 passer rating.
Two quarterbacks handled the passing workload.
Jack Strand
Jack Strand completed 12 of 17 passes for 212 yards.
His statistical line included:
| Statistic | Jack Strand |
| Completions | 12 |
| Attempts | 17 |
| Completion Rate | 70.6% |
| Passing Yards | 212 |
| Yards per Attempt | 12.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 132.5 |
Strand generated the majority of Atlanta’s passing yardage.
His 212 yards represented more than 70% of the Falcons’ total passing production. He also produced the team’s only passing touchdown.
The combination of a 70.6% completion rate and 12.5 yards per attempt is especially notable. It indicates that his completions were not simply short, low-risk throws.
Cooper Rush
Cooper Rush completed 10 of 11 passes for 86 yards.
| Statistic | Cooper Rush |
| Completions | 10 |
| Attempts | 11 |
| Completion Rate | 90.9% |
| Passing Yards | 86 |
| Yards per Attempt | 7.8 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 99.2 |
Rush was extremely accurate during his opportunities.
His 10 completions on 11 attempts produced a 90.9% completion rate. He also avoided interceptions and was not charged with a sack.
The important distinction is sample size. Rush attempted only 11 passes, while Strand attempted 17. Therefore, the numbers should be viewed within the context of their respective workloads rather than treated as identical samples.
Atlanta’s Rushing Attack
The Falcons also created substantial production on the ground.
Atlanta recorded 40 rushing attempts for 164 yards. The team averaged 4.1 yards per carry and scored three rushing touchdowns.
The longest Atlanta run covered 49 yards.
That explosive play came from Tyler Goodson.
Tyler Goodson Leads Atlanta’s Ground Game
Tyler Goodson carried the ball six times for 59 yards.
His rushing line was:
| Statistic | Tyler Goodson |
| Carries | 6 |
| Rushing Yards | 59 |
| Average | 9.8 yards |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest Run | 49 yards |
Goodson’s 49-yard touchdown was the longest rushing play in the game.
His six carries averaged 9.8 yards, which was significantly above Atlanta’s overall 4.1-yard rushing average.
NFL.com also highlighted Goodson’s touchdown run when reviewing the game, noting the effectiveness of Atlanta’s blocking on the play.
Nathan Carter
Nathan Carter received the largest rushing workload for Atlanta.
He carried 17 times for 42 yards and scored one touchdown.
| Statistic | Nathan Carter |
| Carries | 17 |
| Rushing Yards | 42 |
| Average | 2.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest Run | 8 yards |
Carter’s workload is important because his 17 carries accounted for a substantial portion of Atlanta’s rushing attempts.
Although his average was only 2.5 yards per carry, his role helped keep the Falcons’ running game active throughout the contest.
Cash Jones
Cash Jones recorded seven carries for 41 yards.
He averaged 5.9 yards per carry, with an 11-yard run as his longest rushing attempt.
Jones also contributed heavily as a receiver, making his overall offensive involvement particularly interesting.
Jack Strand
Strand added nine carries for 22 yards and one rushing touchdown.
His longest run was 16 yards.
That gave the Falcons another rushing threat from the quarterback position and contributed to Atlanta’s three rushing touchdowns.
Atlanta’s Receiving Numbers
The Falcons completed 22 passes to produce 298 receiving yards according to the supplied receiving totals.
Atlanta averaged 13.5 yards per reception and recorded one receiving touchdown.
The team targeted its receivers 27 times.
Cash Jones Leads Atlanta Receivers
Cash Jones led Atlanta with four receptions for 62 yards and one touchdown.
| Statistic | Cash Jones |
| Receptions | 4 |
| Targets | 4 |
| Receiving Yards | 62 |
| Average | 15.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest Reception | 22 yards |
Jones’ 62 receiving yards were the most by any Atlanta player.
He also scored the Falcons’ receiving touchdown, giving him a meaningful impact in both the running and passing game.
His four targets resulted in four catches, making his receiving workload particularly efficient.
Other Atlanta Receiving Contributors
Vinny Anthony II recorded four receptions for 43 yards on four targets.
Chris Blair added two receptions for 37 yards. His average was 18.5 yards per catch.
Antwane Wells Jr. had one reception for 36 yards. That single catch produced a 36-yard average.
Beaux Collins also made one catch, gaining 35 yards.
Other Atlanta receiving contributions included:
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Yards | Long |
| Vinny Anthony II | 4 | 4 | 43 | 17 |
| Chris Blair | 2 | 2 | 37 | 19 |
| Antwane Wells Jr. | 1 | 2 | 36 | 36 |
| Beaux Collins | 1 | 1 | 35 | 35 |
| Nick Muse | 3 | 3 | 26 | 11 |
| Joshua Simon | 1 | 1 | 21 | 21 |
| Zachariah Branch | 2 | 3 | 15 | 15 |
| Jack Velling | 2 | 2 | 11 | 7 |
| Dylan Drummond | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Tyler Goodson | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
The receiving distribution shows that Atlanta did not rely on just one player to generate its passing yardage.
Several players created explosive gains, while others contributed shorter completions to maintain offensive rhythm.
Indianapolis Colts Passing Performance
Indianapolis had a very different passing profile.
The Colts completed 10 of 23 passes for only 79 yards.
They averaged 3.7 yards per attempt and did not throw a touchdown or interception.
The team recorded a 53.9 passer rating.
Two quarterbacks handled the workload.
Riley Leonard
Riley Leonard started the game and completed seven of 14 passes for 62 yards.
| Statistic | Riley Leonard |
| Completions | 7 |
| Attempts | 14 |
| Completion Rate | 50.0% |
| Passing Yards | 62 |
| Yards per Attempt | 4.4 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 62.2 |
Leonard’s 62 passing yards represented the majority of Indianapolis’ passing production.
His longest completed pass went for 39 yards, which means much of his total production came from a limited number of productive plays.
NFL.com’s game analysis reported that Leonard played the first half before Anthony Richardson took over after halftime.
Anthony Richardson
Anthony Richardson completed three of nine attempts for 24 yards.
He recorded no touchdowns and no interceptions.
However, he was sacked twice for seven total sack yards.
| Statistic | Anthony Richardson |
| Completions | 3 |
| Attempts | 9 |
| Completion Rate | 33.3% |
| Passing Yards | 24 |
| Yards per Attempt | 2.7 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Sack Yards | 7 |
| Passer Rating | 42.4 |
Richardson also contributed 15 rushing yards on three carries.
His passing production was limited, and the two sacks further reduced Indianapolis’ ability to sustain offensive possessions.
The official NFL player log confirms his 3-of-9 passing line for 24 yards and 42.4 rating in this preseason game.
Indianapolis Rushing Production
The Colts finished with 20 rushing attempts for 85 yards.
They averaged 4.3 yards per carry but did not score a rushing touchdown.
Their longest rushing play covered only 10 yards.
Anderson Castle
Anderson Castle led Indianapolis in rushing.
He carried eight times for 41 yards.
| Statistic | Anderson Castle |
| Carries | 8 |
| Rushing Yards | 41 |
| Average | 5.1 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 10 |
Castle’s 5.1 yards per carry was the highest among Indianapolis players with multiple carries.
Seth McGowan
Seth McGowan had eight carries for 27 yards.
He averaged 3.4 yards per carry and recorded a seven-yard longest run.
McGowan also caught one pass for five yards, giving him involvement in both phases of the Colts offense.
Anthony Richardson
Richardson rushed three times for 15 yards.
His 5.0-yard average showed that his mobility added some value outside the passing game.
Still, Indianapolis did not turn those rushing opportunities into touchdowns.
Indianapolis Receiving Statistics
The Colts finished with 10 receptions for 86 receiving yards according to the supplied receiving data.
They averaged 8.6 yards per reception and recorded no receiving touchdowns.
Indianapolis receivers were targeted 23 times.
Coleman Owen
Coleman Owen recorded the longest reception of the game for Indianapolis.
He caught one pass for 39 yards.
| Statistic | Coleman Owen |
| Receptions | 1 |
| Targets | 5 |
| Receiving Yards | 39 |
| Average | 39.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Reception | 39 |
The difference between his target volume and reception total is important.
Owen was targeted five times but made one catch. That single reception accounted for nearly half of Indianapolis’ total receiving yardage.
Deion Burks
Deion Burks led the Colts in receptions.
He caught four passes for 19 yards on five targets.
His average was 4.8 yards per reception.
That production shows a significant contrast with Owen’s explosive 39-yard catch. Burks was involved more frequently, but his receptions generally produced shorter gains.
Other Indianapolis receiving numbers included:
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Yards | Long |
| Deion Burks | 4 | 5 | 19 | 13 |
| D.J. Montgomery | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Pharaoh Brown | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
| Eli Pancol | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Seth McGowan | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Laquon Treadwell | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
One notable detail is the unusual line for Laquon Treadwell. He recorded three receptions for zero yards despite being listed with one target in the supplied data. Because the supplied statistics contain this apparent inconsistency, the figures should be preserved as reported rather than attempting to infer a different value.
Atlanta Defense vs Indianapolis Offense
Atlanta’s defense produced several plays that helped maintain control.
The Falcons recorded:
- 55 total tackles
- 28 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 3 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 5 quarterback hits
- 0 defensive touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
Josh Woods led Atlanta with five tackles, including three solo tackles.
DeMarcco Hellams recorded three tackles, two solo tackles, one sack, and two quarterback hits.
Daveren Rayner added three tackles, including three solo tackles and one tackle for loss.
These numbers show that Atlanta generated pressure without relying on interceptions.
The defense also benefited from Indianapolis’ inability to consistently create explosive offensive plays.
Indianapolis Defense vs Atlanta Offense
The Colts actually recorded more total tackles.
Indianapolis finished with:
- 76 tackles
- 54 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 4 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 1 quarterback hit
- 0 defensive touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
Jaylon Carlies led Indianapolis with six tackles and five solo tackles.
Austin Ajiake also recorded six tackles, including four solo tackles, one tackle for loss, and one pass defended.
Tim Smith contributed five tackles and four solo tackles.
The high tackle total is partly connected to Atlanta’s 40 rushing attempts and 22 completed passes. More defensive plays can produce more tackle opportunities, even when the offense is winning the overall statistical battle.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers did not dominate this matchup.
Atlanta recorded no fumbles and no interceptions.
Indianapolis recorded one team fumble, with Riley Leonard credited with the fumble. The Colts recovered it themselves, so it did not become a turnover.
Neither team intercepted a pass.
That means Atlanta’s 28-point victory was not built on a large turnover advantage.
Instead, the difference came primarily from sustained offensive production, explosive plays, touchdowns, and field-position control.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams also contributed to the overall statistical picture.
Atlanta Kicking
Nick Folk was perfect on his field-goal attempts.
He converted two of two field goals and all four extra-point attempts.
His longest field goal was 51 yards.
He finished with 10 points.
Indianapolis Kicking
Spencer Shrader converted two of two field goals.
His longest successful field goal was 53 yards, and he scored six points.
Blake Grupe attempted one field goal but did not convert.
Indianapolis therefore finished two of three on field-goal attempts.
Atlanta Punting
Jake Bailey punted twice for 112 yards.
His average was 56.0 yards per punt, with a longest punt of 58 yards.
One punt finished inside the 20-yard line.
Indianapolis Punting
Rigoberto Sanchez had a much heavier workload.
He punted seven times for 381 yards.
His average was 54.4 yards, with a longest punt of 66 yards.
One punt resulted in a touchback.
The seven punts are another indication of Indianapolis’ offensive struggles. The Colts repeatedly failed to sustain drives and had to rely on their punting unit.
Return Game Breakdown
Atlanta recorded three kickoff returns for 88 yards.
The Falcons averaged 29.3 yards per return.
Tyler Goodson had one 37-yard kickoff return.
Vinny Anthony II returned one kickoff for 28 yards.
Cash Jones returned one for 23 yards.
Atlanta also recorded six punt returns for 60 yards.
Dylan Drummond handled four punt returns for 49 yards, averaging 12.3 yards per return.
Indianapolis recorded seven kickoff returns for 172 yards.
Deion Burks accounted for five of those returns and gained 120 yards.
Coleman Owen added two returns for 52 yards.
Owen also returned the Colts’ only punt for 17 yards.
The return statistics show that Indianapolis generated useful kickoff return yardage, but that field-position advantage did not translate into offensive scoring.
Key Statistical Differences
The most useful way to understand this game is to compare the major statistical categories directly.
| Category | Atlanta | Indianapolis |
| Final Score | 34 | 6 |
| Passing | 297 yards | 79 yards |
| Rushing | 164 yards | 85 yards |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing TDs | 3 | 0 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 461 | 164 |
| Passing Attempts | 28 | 23 |
| Completions | 22 | 10 |
| Rushing Attempts | 40 | 20 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks | 2 defensive | 1 defensive |
| Team Fumbles | 0 | 1 |
| Field Goals | 2/2 | 2/3 |
The offensive yardage difference is the central story.
Atlanta produced 461 yards compared with Indianapolis’ 164.
That represents a difference of 297 yards.
The Falcons also scored four touchdowns while the Colts did not score an offensive touchdown.
What the Player Stats Reveal
The atlanta falcons vs colts match player stats reveal several important patterns beyond the final score.
Atlanta Created Explosive Plays
Goodson’s 49-yard touchdown run immediately stands out.
Atlanta also had several large receiving gains, including catches of 36 and 35 yards.
Those plays significantly increased the Falcons’ yards per play and helped them turn drives into points.
Atlanta Had Better Quarterback Efficiency
Strand completed 12 of 17 passes for 212 yards and a touchdown.
Rush completed 10 of 11 passes for 86 yards without a touchdown or interception.
Together, the quarterbacks completed 22 of 28 passes.
Indianapolis completed only 10 of 23 attempts.
That completion difference alone shows how much more efficiently Atlanta moved the ball through the air.
Atlanta Balanced Passing and Rushing
The Falcons recorded 164 rushing yards and 297 passing yards.
They also scored three rushing touchdowns and one passing touchdown.
This balance made the offense difficult to stop throughout the game.
Indianapolis Struggled to Sustain Drives
The Colts finished with only 79 passing yards.
Their 20 rushing attempts produced 85 yards, but the offense could not convert that production into touchdowns.
The seven punts by Sanchez provide another indication of how frequently Indianapolis possessions ended without points.
Why Preseason Context Matters
It is important not to treat a preseason box score exactly like a regular-season matchup.
Preseason games are often used to evaluate depth players, young players, position battles, and players competing for roster spots.
Quarterbacks may receive limited playing time.
Coaches can also use simplified game plans or specific situational packages.
Therefore, the statistics provide valuable information, but they do not automatically represent how either team’s regular-season offense will operate.
This is especially relevant when examining quarterback numbers.
Strand and Rush shared Atlanta’s passing work, while Leonard and Richardson divided Indianapolis’ opportunities.
The distribution of snaps and responsibilities matters when interpreting the raw numbers.
Player Stats That Deserve Extra Attention
Several statistical lines deserve a closer look when reviewing the game.
Jack Strand’s 212 Passing Yards
Strand produced 212 yards on 17 attempts.
That is 12.5 yards per attempt, which indicates considerable downfield production.
His one touchdown and zero interceptions also produced a clean passing profile.
Tyler Goodson’s 49-Yard Touchdown
Goodson’s six carries produced 59 yards.
One 49-yard run accounted for most of that total.
That makes his average of 9.8 yards per carry impressive, but it should also be interpreted alongside the small number of attempts.
Cash Jones’ Dual Impact
Jones contributed 41 rushing yards and 62 receiving yards.
He also scored the receiving touchdown.
Combining those figures gives him 103 yards from scrimmage.
His involvement across multiple phases made him one of Atlanta’s most statistically productive offensive players.
Coleman Owen’s 39-Yard Reception
Owen caught only one pass, but that catch covered 39 yards.
It was Indianapolis’ longest reception.
His five targets compared with one reception also show why reception totals alone do not fully explain a player’s involvement.
Atlanta Falcons vs Colts Match Player Stats: Final Statistical Takeaway
The atlanta falcons vs colts match player stats show a preseason game decided primarily by offensive efficiency.
Atlanta passed for 297 yards, rushed for 164 yards, and scored four touchdowns.
Indianapolis managed only 79 passing yards and 85 rushing yards, with no offensive touchdowns.
The Falcons also avoided turnovers and converted their scoring opportunities effectively.
Jack Strand led Atlanta’s passing production with 212 yards and one touchdown. Tyler Goodson provided the game’s biggest rushing play with a 49-yard touchdown. Cash Jones added 103 combined rushing and receiving yards based on the supplied statistics.
For Indianapolis, Riley Leonard passed for 62 yards, while Anthony Richardson added 15 rushing yards. Anderson Castle led the Colts with 41 rushing yards, and Coleman Owen produced the team’s longest reception with a 39-yard catch.
The most important statistical difference was total offensive production. Atlanta generated 461 yards, while Indianapolis produced 164.
The game therefore provides a detailed example of how explosive plays, efficient quarterbacking, rushing touchdowns, and sustained offensive production can create a large preseason scoring gap.
Because this was a preseason contest, the numbers should be read primarily as individual performance data and roster-evaluation evidence rather than as a direct forecast of regular-season roles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Falcons and Colts?
Atlanta defeated Indianapolis 34-6 on August 22, 2026, during the NFL preseason.
Who was Atlanta’s leading passer?
Jack Strand led Atlanta with 212 passing yards on 12 completions in 17 attempts. He threw one touchdown and no interceptions.
Who led Atlanta in rushing?
Tyler Goodson led Atlanta with 59 rushing yards on six carries. He scored one touchdown and recorded a 49-yard run.
Who led Atlanta in receiving?
Cash Jones led the Falcons with four receptions for 62 yards and one touchdown.
How many passing yards did the Colts have?
Indianapolis finished with 79 team passing yards. Riley Leonard had 62 yards, while Anthony Richardson had 24 yards.
Did either team throw an interception?
No. Neither Atlanta nor Indianapolis recorded an interception in the game.
Conclusion
The August 22, 2026 preseason matchup produced a clear statistical separation between the Falcons and Colts.
Atlanta’s 34-6 victory was supported by 297 passing yards, 164 rushing yards, four touchdowns, and no turnovers.
Jack Strand supplied the largest passing contribution, Tyler Goodson delivered the longest rushing play, and Cash Jones made an impact as both a runner and receiver.
Indianapolis had some individual highlights, including Coleman Owen’s 39-yard reception and Anderson Castle’s 41 rushing yards. However, the Colts could not turn those contributions into sustained scoring drives.
The quarterback numbers also explain much of the offensive difference. Atlanta completed 22 of 28 passes, while Indianapolis completed only 10 of 23.
The final box score therefore tells a consistent story across passing, rushing, touchdowns, and overall yardage. Atlanta’s offense generated more consistent production and more explosive plays, while Indianapolis spent much of the game unable to maintain offensive momentum.
