Denver Nuggets vs Knicks Match Player Stats
The Denver Nuggets vs Knicks match player stats from February 4, 2026, tell the story of one of the most dramatic games of the NBA season. The New York Knicks defeated the Denver Nuggets 134-127 in double overtime at Madison Square Garden, extending their winning streak to eight games.
This was not simply a game decided by one hot scorer. The numbers reveal a much more interesting contest involving shot selection, three-point efficiency, rebounding, turnovers, late-game execution and the ability of key players to survive an unusually long game.
For anyone researching the Denver Nuggets vs Knicks match player stats, the most important takeaway is that both teams produced elite individual performances, but New York was more efficient from the field and from three-point range. Denver created enough offense to win, yet the Knicks repeatedly found ways to answer in the most important possessions.
The game also provides a useful example of why a traditional box score should be read as a complete story rather than as a simple list of points.
Denver Nuggets vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game took place on February 4, 2026, at Madison Square Garden in New York.
The final score was:
New York Knicks 134, Denver Nuggets 127
The game required two overtime periods after neither team could settle the contest in regulation or the first extra period. The game featured 20 lead changes and 19 ties, illustrating just how competitive the matchup remained throughout the night.
Final Team Comparison
| Statistic | Denver Nuggets | New York Knicks |
| Points | 127 | 134 |
| Field Goals | 46/105 | 50/100 |
| Field Goal % | 43.8% | 50.0% |
| Three-Pointers | 13/50 | 18/50 |
| Three-Point % | 26.0% | 36.0% |
| Free Throws | 22/27 | 16/19 |
| Free Throw % | 81.5% | 84.2% |
| Rebounds | 51 | 45 |
| Assists | 29 | 28 |
| Steals | 8 | 4 |
| Blocks | 3 | 2 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 11 |
One of the clearest statistical differences was shooting efficiency.
Denver attempted 105 field goals and made 46. New York attempted 100 and made 50. That five-shot difference in made baskets was important because the Knicks converted half of their attempts while Denver finished below 44 percent.
The three-point gap was even more meaningful. Both teams attempted exactly 50 threes, but New York made 18 while Denver made only 13.
That created a 15-point advantage from three-point makes alone.
Jalen Brunson Leads the Knicks With 42 Points
Jalen Brunson was the most important scorer in the game.
His final line was:
42 points, 14-of-27 field goals, 5-of-12 three-pointers, 9-of-11 free throws, 8 rebounds, 9 assists, 2 steals and 5 turnovers.
The raw scoring total immediately stands out, but the timing of Brunson’s scoring is even more important.
He did not merely accumulate points during a long double-overtime game. He became increasingly important when the margin for error disappeared.
Brunson scored 10 points in the second overtime as the Knicks pulled away.
That is the difference between a high-scoring performance and a genuinely decisive performance.
Brunson’s Shooting Profile
Brunson took 27 field-goal attempts, making 14.
That is a 51.9 percent field-goal rate.
He also converted five of 12 three-point attempts, giving him 41.7 percent accuracy from beyond the arc.
His free-throw performance was equally valuable. He made nine of 11 attempts.
In a seven-point game that required two overtimes, those extra points mattered.
His nine assists also demonstrate that Denver could not simply focus on stopping his scoring. When defensive attention increased, Brunson remained capable of creating opportunities for teammates.
The five turnovers are the main negative statistic in his line, but the overall production outweighed that weakness.
Jamal Murray Keeps Denver Competitive
Jamal Murray produced Denver’s second major individual performance.
His final statistics were:
39 points, 15-of-33 shooting, 3-of-14 from three, 6-of-7 free throws, 5 rebounds, 6 assists and 1 steal.
Murray played 48 minutes and carried a major scoring burden.
His 15 made field goals were the most on the Denver roster, and his 33 attempts reflected how heavily the Nuggets relied on him offensively.
The interesting part of his performance is the contrast between his overall scoring and his three-point shooting.
He scored 39 points despite making only three of 14 three-point attempts.
That means most of his offensive value came from two-point scoring and free throws rather than efficient perimeter shooting.
Murray also provided six assists, which helped Denver maintain offensive balance rather than turning every possession into an isolation attempt.
His four turnovers were costly, especially in a game decided by seven points after 58 minutes of basketball.
Still, without Murray’s scoring output, Denver would likely have been unable to stay level with New York for so long.
Nikola Jokić Produces a Triple-Double
Nikola Jokić finished with:
30 points, 10 rebounds, 10 assists, 10-of-27 field goals, 1-of-13 three-pointers and 9-of-12 free throws.
His triple-double was one of the most significant statistical achievements of the game.
It was also notable because Jokić was returning from a knee injury, and this was his first triple-double since returning.
Jokić’s 10 assists demonstrate how much Denver’s offense depended on his passing.
However, his shooting numbers show why the Nuggets had difficulty turning their offensive production into a victory.
He made only one of 13 three-point attempts.
That is a major outlier for a player capable of stretching defenses from the perimeter.
Jokić’s Passing Still Changed the Game
It would be a mistake to judge Jokić’s performance only by his three-point percentage.
His 10 assists meant that his offensive influence extended beyond scoring.
Jokić’s ability to rebound and immediately initiate offense also allowed Denver to attack before New York could establish its full half-court defense.
He finished with 14 rebounds according to the supplied game data, giving him control over the glass as well as playmaking responsibilities.
His performance is a good example of why player evaluation requires context.
A 30-point triple-double is elite production.
At the same time, 1-of-13 shooting from three shows an area where Denver’s offense was inefficient.
Both facts can be true.
Karl-Anthony Towns Delivers an Efficient Performance
Karl-Anthony Towns gave New York an important interior and perimeter scoring combination.
His line:
24 points, 9-of-13 shooting, 2-of-6 from three, 4-of-4 free throws and 12 rebounds.
Towns shot 69.2 percent from the field.
That was one of the most efficient high-volume scoring performances in the game.
He also made two three-pointers, meaning Denver could not simply ignore him outside the paint.
His 12 rebounds were equally important.
New York actually finished with fewer total rebounds than Denver, 45 to 51, but Towns individually gave the Knicks a strong presence on the glass.
The game also included a difficult moment for Towns.
He suffered a head-to-head collision in the first quarter that left him with a cut above his right eye. He returned after treatment and continued playing before eventually fouling out in the first overtime.
That context matters when examining his statistics.
His 24 points and 12 rebounds were not produced under normal game conditions.
OG Anunoby Provides Two-Way Value
OG Anunoby recorded:
20 points, 7-of-17 shooting, 4-of-9 from three, 2-of-2 free throws, 8 rebounds and 4 assists.
His 20 points were valuable, but his four made three-pointers were particularly important.
New York needed reliable perimeter shooting because Denver’s offense was capable of generating points through Jokić and Murray.
Anunoby’s shooting forced Denver to respect another scoring threat.
His eight rebounds and four assists also show that his contribution went beyond scoring.
In a double-overtime game, players who can contribute in several areas become increasingly valuable because the game becomes less predictable and possessions become more taxing.
Mikal Bridges Has a Quiet Offensive Night
Mikal Bridges scored 13 points on:
2-of-8 shooting, 1-of-6 from three, 4 rebounds, 4 assists, 1 steal and 1 block.
His scoring efficiency was not strong, but the box score does not capture every aspect of his role.
Bridges contributed four assists and produced defensive statistics as well.
He also committed five personal fouls, which became increasingly relevant as the game entered overtime.
His offensive struggles were partly offset by the fact that New York had several other players capable of creating points.
That is an important characteristic of the Knicks’ performance.
They did not require every starter to shoot efficiently for the offense to remain dangerous.
Tim Hardaway Jr. Gives Denver a Major Bench Boost
Tim Hardaway Jr. was one of Denver’s most efficient offensive players.
He scored:
19 points on 6-of-8 shooting, 4-of-6 from three and 3-of-3 at the free-throw line.
That is a remarkable shooting night.
Hardaway made 75 percent of his field-goal attempts and 66.7 percent of his three-point attempts.
He also added six rebounds and two assists.
His performance is especially interesting because Denver lost despite receiving highly efficient scoring from its bench.
The problem was that Denver did not get enough overall shooting efficiency from its highest-volume scorers.
Hardaway’s efficiency therefore helped keep the Nuggets competitive but could not completely compensate for the struggles elsewhere.
Denver’s Supporting Cast
Denver received several useful contributions outside its three leading scorers.
Christian Braun
Braun finished with:
6 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists.
His scoring was limited, but six assists from a non-primary scoring role helped Denver move the ball.
He also played an important role late in the first overtime.
Braun was fouled with 0.3 seconds remaining after a reviewed loose-ball foul involving Mikal Bridges. Braun made both free throws to tie the game at 119 and force another overtime.
That sequence was one of the most important moments of the entire contest.
Bruce Brown
Brown scored 10 points while shooting 4-of-9 from the field and 2-of-4 from three.
He also collected five rebounds and recorded three steals.
His defensive activity was useful in a game where Denver needed extra possessions.
Julian Strawther
Strawther was highly efficient, scoring 11 points on 4-of-5 shooting.
He also made two of three three-point attempts and added three rebounds and one assist.
Like Hardaway, Strawther provided efficient perimeter scoring that helped Denver maintain offensive pressure.
Peyton Watson
Watson finished with 10 points, five rebounds, two assists, one steal and one block.
His shooting was inefficient at 4-of-13, however, and he made only one of six three-point attempts.
Watson left the game after appearing to injure his right leg.
That development mattered because Denver’s rotation became more constrained as the game moved deeper into overtime.
New York’s Bench Makes an Important Contribution
The Knicks also received useful production from their second unit.
Landry Shamet
Shamet scored 16 points on 6-of-15 shooting.
He made four of 10 three-point attempts.
Those four three-pointers helped New York maintain its perimeter advantage.
Jordan Clarkson
Clarkson scored 11 points on 5-of-7 shooting.
His efficiency gave New York another reliable scoring option.
Mitchell Robinson
Robinson was extremely efficient.
He made all five of his field-goal attempts and finished with:
10 points, 8 rebounds, 1 steal and 1 block.
He did not attempt a three-pointer or free throw.
His impact came from finishing around the basket and contributing on the glass.
The Three-Point Difference Was a Major Factor
One of the clearest lessons from the Denver Nuggets vs Knicks match player stats is the importance of three-point efficiency.
Both teams attempted 50 three-pointers.
That makes the comparison particularly clean.
Denver:
13-of-50, 26.0%
New York:
18-of-50, 36.0%
The Knicks therefore made five more three-pointers despite taking the same number of attempts.
Each additional made three is worth three points, so the difference represented 15 points of scoring.
The final margin was only seven points.
That does not mean the three-point difference alone explains the entire game, but it clearly shaped the result.
Denver actually made more free throws than New York:
Denver: 22-of-27
New York: 16-of-19
Denver therefore gained six points at the free-throw line.
But New York’s perimeter advantage was substantially larger.
This is a useful reminder that shooting volume and shooting efficiency need to be evaluated together.
Field-Goal Efficiency Favored New York
The Knicks made 50 of 100 field-goal attempts.
Denver made 46 of 105.
That created a 6.2 percentage-point difference in field-goal percentage:
New York: 50.0%
Denver: 43.8%
Denver took five more shots but made four fewer.
That combination is difficult to overcome unless a team creates a major advantage elsewhere.
The Nuggets did generate more rebounds and more steals, but New York’s shooting efficiency remained a decisive advantage.
Rebounding Favored Denver
Denver finished with 51 rebounds compared with 45 for New York.
That six-rebound advantage is significant.
Jokić led the Nuggets with 14 rebounds, while Christian Braun and several other Denver players contributed to the overall advantage.
For New York, Towns led the way with 12 rebounds and Robinson added eight.
Despite winning the game, the Knicks did not dominate the glass.
This is an important part of the statistical story because it demonstrates that New York’s victory was not based on controlling every traditional category.
Instead, the Knicks won despite losing the rebounding battle.
Turnovers Also Favored the Knicks
Denver committed 14 turnovers.
New York committed 11.
That three-turnover difference may appear small, but late in a tightly contested game, every extra possession matters.
Denver produced more points off turnovers in the broader game comparison, but New York still finished with the lower overall turnover total.
The Knicks therefore avoided giving Denver as many opportunities to turn defensive pressure into additional possessions.
The Overtime Periods Changed the Meaning of the Box Score
This game cannot be evaluated like a normal 48-minute contest.
The teams played 58 minutes.
That extra 10 minutes affected scoring totals, playing time and fatigue.
Jokić played 45 minutes.
Murray played 48.
Brunson and other major Knicks players also carried heavy workloads.
That makes the individual scoring totals impressive, but it also means raw totals should be interpreted carefully.
A 42-point performance over 58 minutes is different from 42 points in regulation.
The same applies to assists, rebounds and other counting statistics.
Still, the overtime production matters because it happened under the highest-pressure circumstances.
Why the Knicks Won
The Knicks’ victory can be explained through several connected factors.
1. Better Shooting Efficiency
New York made 50 percent of its field goals.
Denver made 43.8 percent.
That was a substantial difference.
2. Superior Three-Point Shooting
The Knicks made 18 threes compared with Denver’s 13.
With equal attempts, New York clearly won the efficiency battle from deep.
3. Brunson’s Late-Game Scoring
Brunson became the defining offensive player in the second overtime.
His ability to generate points when possessions became more valuable was critical.
4. Multiple Reliable Scorers
Towns scored 24.
Anunoby scored 20.
Shamet scored 16.
Clarkson scored 11.
Robinson scored 10.
That gave New York several ways to produce offense.
5. Lower Turnover Total
New York committed 11 turnovers compared with Denver’s 14.
That helped the Knicks protect possessions in a game where every possession had increasing importance.
Why Denver Lost Despite Elite Individual Performances
Denver’s loss is more difficult to explain through individual scoring.
The Nuggets received:
39 points from Murray
30 points from Jokić
19 points from Hardaway Jr.
Those three players alone combined for 88 points.
Yet Denver still lost.
The biggest issue was efficiency.
Murray attempted 33 field goals and made 15.
Jokić attempted 27 and made 10.
Denver’s two biggest offensive stars combined for 25 made shots on 60 attempts.
Their combined three-point shooting was also poor.
Murray made three of 14 from deep.
Jokić made one of 13.
That is four made threes on 27 attempts.
Meanwhile, New York’s perimeter players collectively generated much better three-point efficiency.
A Closer Look at Shot Selection
The game demonstrates why three-point attempts alone do not tell the full story.
Denver and New York both attempted 50 three-pointers.
If someone looked only at volume, the teams appeared identical.
But the results were very different.
Denver converted 26 percent.
New York converted 36 percent.
The difference came from execution rather than willingness to shoot.
This distinction is especially important when analyzing modern NBA games.
A team can generate plenty of three-point attempts but still struggle if those attempts come from inefficient shooters or difficult situations.
Denver’s 13-of-50 shooting from deep is a clear example.
What the Match Says About Jokić and Brunson
The matchup also offered an interesting contrast between two very different offensive engines.
Jokić influenced the game through scoring, rebounding and passing.
Brunson placed more emphasis on perimeter creation and scoring pressure.
Jokić:
30 points, 14 rebounds, 10 assists
Brunson:
42 points, 8 rebounds, 9 assists
Both players approached triple-double territory.
Yet Brunson’s 42 points became the defining offensive number because his scoring arrived at the most decisive moments.
This does not mean Brunson had the more complete statistical performance in every category.
It means his scoring was particularly influential in the final stages.
Important Bench and Rotation Lessons
The game also highlights the value of depth.
Denver received strong shooting from Hardaway Jr. and Strawther.
New York received valuable contributions from Shamet, Clarkson and Robinson.
However, double overtime placed unusual demands on the rotation.
Players who normally play limited minutes were suddenly important.
Foul trouble also became more significant.
Towns eventually fouled out in the first overtime, removing one of New York’s best performers during a critical stretch.
Denver also had injury-related complications involving Watson and Spencer Jones.
These developments show why a complete box-score analysis should include more than points and shooting percentages.
Availability, fouls, injuries and playing time can change the competitive balance late in a game.
Denver Nuggets vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Most Important Numbers
For readers who want the fastest statistical summary, these are the numbers that deserve the most attention.
Jalen Brunson: 42 points, 8 rebounds, 9 assists
Jamal Murray: 39 points, 5 rebounds, 6 assists
Nikola Jokić: 30 points, 14 rebounds, 10 assists
Karl-Anthony Towns: 24 points, 12 rebounds
OG Anunoby: 20 points, 8 rebounds
Tim Hardaway Jr.: 19 points, 6 rebounds
Landry Shamet: 16 points
Mikal Bridges: 13 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists
Julian Strawther: 11 points
Jordan Clarkson: 11 points
Peyton Watson: 10 points
Bruce Brown: 10 points
Mitchell Robinson: 10 points, 8 rebounds
The broader team numbers are equally important:
Knicks field goal percentage: 50.0%
Nuggets field goal percentage: 43.8%
Knicks three-point percentage: 36.0%
Nuggets three-point percentage: 26.0%
Nuggets rebounds: 51
Knicks rebounds: 45
Nuggets turnovers: 14
Knicks turnovers: 11
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
A common mistake when reviewing NBA box scores is to rank players entirely by points.
That would make Brunson the obvious winner, followed by Murray and Jokić.
But the deeper picture is more useful.
A strong analysis should consider:
- Scoring volume
- Shooting efficiency
- Three-point accuracy
- Free-throw production
- Rebounding
- Playmaking
- Turnovers
- Defensive contributions
- Playing time
- Late-game impact
Using that framework produces a more balanced evaluation.
Brunson was the game’s leading scorer and most influential late-game scorer.
Jokić produced the most complete statistical line for Denver.
Murray delivered tremendous scoring volume.
Towns provided highly efficient scoring and rebounding.
Anunoby gave New York valuable two-way production.
Hardaway Jr. was one of Denver’s most efficient shooters.
That is a much richer interpretation than simply looking at the final score.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most in the Nuggets vs Knicks game?
Jalen Brunson scored the most, finishing with 42 points for New York. Jamal Murray led Denver with 39 points.
What was the final score between Denver and New York?
The Knicks defeated the Nuggets 134-127 in double overtime at Madison Square Garden.
Did Nikola Jokić record a triple-double?
Yes. Jokić finished with 30 points, 14 rebounds and 10 assists, giving him a triple-double.
How many points did Jamal Murray score?
Jamal Murray scored 39 points on 15-of-33 shooting. He also recorded five rebounds and six assists.
How many points did Karl-Anthony Towns score?
Karl-Anthony Towns scored 24 points and grabbed 12 rebounds while shooting 9-of-13 from the field.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
The Knicks shot better from three. New York made 18 of 50 attempts for 36.0 percent, while Denver made 13 of 50 for 26.0 percent.
Conclusion
The Denver Nuggets vs Knicks match player stats reveal a game that was far more competitive than the seven-point final margin suggests.
New York won 134-127 after two overtime periods, but Denver consistently challenged the Knicks throughout the night. The 20 lead changes and 19 ties underline how little separated the teams for most of the contest.
Jalen Brunson ultimately became the defining figure for New York with 42 points, nine assists and eight rebounds. His 10 points in the second overtime were particularly important.
Jamal Murray answered with 39 points and kept Denver’s offense alive deep into the night. Nikola Jokić added a 30-point triple-double, demonstrating his all-around influence even though his three-point shooting was unusually inefficient.
For New York, Karl-Anthony Towns contributed 24 points and 12 rebounds, while OG Anunoby added 20 points. Landry Shamet, Jordan Clarkson and Mitchell Robinson also supplied meaningful production.
The most revealing team statistic was three-point efficiency. Both teams attempted 50 threes, but New York made 18 while Denver made 13. The Knicks also shot 50 percent overall compared with Denver’s 43.8 percent.
Denver won the rebounding battle and received excellent scoring from several players, but New York’s superior shooting efficiency, lower turnover total and late-game execution ultimately proved decisive.
That combination makes this matchup a particularly useful example of how NBA games are won. Individual stars can produce extraordinary numbers, but efficiency, supporting contributions and execution under pressure still determine the result.
