New York Giants vs New Orleans Saints Match Player Stats
The New York Giants vs New Orleans Saints Match Player Stats from October 5, 2025, tell a much more detailed story than the 26-14 final score alone. New Orleans defeated New York by 12 points, but the box score shows that the game was shaped by several specific factors: turnovers, passing efficiency, explosive receiving plays, defensive takeaways, and the Saints’ ability to convert scoring opportunities. The Giants moved the ball effectively at times and finished with 136 rushing yards, but three lost fumbles and two interceptions from quarterback Jaxson Dart created a major disadvantage.
The Saints entered the game at 1-4 overall and improved their position with a 26-14 home victory, while the Giants fell to 1-4 overall and 0-3 on the road. New Orleans built its advantage by scoring 13 points in the second quarter and another 7 in the fourth. New York scored all 14 of its points in the first half and was held scoreless after halftime.
This detailed breakdown examines the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, kicking, return, and turnover numbers to explain how the game developed and which individual performances mattered most.
New York Giants vs New Orleans Saints Match Player Stats at a Glance
| Category | New York Giants | New Orleans Saints |
| Final Score | 14 | 26 |
| Record | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Passing Yards | 202 | 244 |
| Rushing Yards | 136 | 88 |
| Total Offensive Production | 338 yards | 332 yards |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 1 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 2 | 0 |
| Team Fumbles Lost | 3 | 0 |
| Total Receiving Yards | 202 | 244 |
| Leading Receiver | Daniel Bellinger, 52 yards | Rashid Shaheed, 114 yards |
| Leading Rusher | Cam Skattebo, 59 yards | Kendre Miller, 41 yards |
| Leading Tackler | Bobby Okereke, 10 | Pete Werner, 11 |
| Defensive INTs | 0 | 2 |
| Field Goals | 0/0 | 4/6 |
| Extra Points | 2/2 | 2/2 |
One of the most interesting points in the New York Giants vs New Orleans Saints Match Player Stats is that the Giants actually produced more rushing yardage than New Orleans by a significant margin. New York gained 136 yards on 29 carries, while New Orleans managed 88 yards on 30 attempts.
Yet the Saints won comfortably.
That difference highlights why individual box-score categories need to be examined together rather than viewed in isolation.
Final Score and Game Flow
The Saints won 26-14, but the scoring pattern changed considerably throughout the afternoon.
First Quarter
New York scored 7 points in the opening quarter, while New Orleans managed 3.
The Giants therefore started with a 7-3 lead and appeared to have early control of the scoreboard.
Second Quarter
The Saints responded strongly in the second period.
New Orleans scored 13 points, while New York added another 7.
At halftime, the Saints led 16-14.
This was an important turning point because the Giants had scored twice in the first half but could not maintain that offensive production after the break.
Third Quarter
New Orleans added another 3 points in the third quarter.
The Giants failed to score.
The Saints therefore entered the fourth quarter with a 19-14 advantage.
Fourth Quarter
New Orleans closed the game with another touchdown, scoring 7 points in the final period.
The Giants again failed to score.
The final result was 26-14.
The second-half scoring pattern is especially important. New York had 14 points by halftime but produced zero points in the final two quarters. New Orleans, meanwhile, continued adding points and ultimately created the 12-point winning margin.
Jaxson Dart’s Passing Performance
Jaxson Dart completed 26 of 40 passes for 202 yards, averaging 5.1 yards per attempt.
He threw two touchdowns and two interceptions.
His reported passer rating was 73.1, while his QBR was 55.2.
The completion volume was respectable. Dart completed 65% of his attempts, which shows that New York was able to generate a reasonable number of completions.
The bigger problem was what happened with those possessions.
Two interceptions were credited to Dart, and the Giants also lost three fumbles as a team. Against a team that did not turn the ball over, that created a substantial possession disadvantage.
Dart also contributed significantly on the ground.
He carried the ball seven times for 55 yards, averaging 7.9 yards per attempt. His longest run was 20 yards.
That means Dart was not simply a passer during this game. His rushing production was one of the Giants’ most effective sources of yardage.
Dart’s Key Numbers
- Completions: 26
- Attempts: 40
- Completion rate: 65%
- Passing yards: 202
- Average: 5.1 yards per attempt
- Passing touchdowns: 2
- Interceptions: 2
- QBR: 55.2
- Passer rating: 73.1
- Rushing attempts: 7
- Rushing yards: 55
- Longest rush: 20 yards
From a statistical perspective, Dart’s performance was mixed. The 26 completions and two touchdown passes provided positive production, but the two interceptions and relatively modest 5.1-yard passing average limited the efficiency of the passing game.
Spencer Rattler Controls the Passing Efficiency
Spencer Rattler delivered a more efficient performance for New Orleans.
He completed 21 of 31 passes for 225 yards, averaging 7.5 yards per attempt. He threw one touchdown and did not throw an interception.
His reported QBR was 60.1, with a passer rating of 99.5.
The difference between the quarterbacks becomes clearer when efficiency and turnovers are considered together.
Rattler averaged 7.5 yards per attempt compared with Dart’s 5.1. He also avoided interceptions.
Rattler’s passing line was:
- 21 completions
- 31 attempts
- 225 yards
- 7.5 yards per attempt
- 1 touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 60.1 QBR
- 99.5 passer rating
- 0 sacks recorded
Taysom Hill also completed his only pass attempt for 19 yards.
That gave New Orleans 244 team passing yards.
The Saints’ passing game therefore generated more yardage while also avoiding the interceptions that hurt New York.
Rushing Breakdown
The rushing statistics provide one of the clearest examples of why yardage totals alone do not determine the winner.
The Giants ran for 136 yards on 29 carries, averaging 4.7 yards per carry.
The Saints ran for 88 yards on 30 carries, averaging 2.9 yards per carry.
New York therefore had a 48-yard advantage in rushing production.
Cam Skattebo Leads the Giants
Cam Skattebo was New York’s leading traditional rusher.
He carried 15 times for 59 yards, averaging 3.9 yards per carry. His longest run was 9 yards.
His rushing line:
- 15 carries
- 59 yards
- 3.9 average
- 0 touchdowns
- 9-yard long
Skattebo also played an important role as a receiver.
He caught six passes for 45 yards on seven targets, averaging 7.5 yards per reception.
His involvement in both phases made him one of the Giants’ more active offensive players.
Jaxson Dart Adds 55 Rushing Yards
Dart’s 55 rushing yards were a major component of New York’s overall ground production.
He carried seven times for 55 yards, averaging 7.9 yards per carry, with a 20-yard long.
That 20-yard run was the longest rushing play listed for the Giants.
Devin Singletary’s Contribution
Devin Singletary recorded six carries for 20 yards.
He averaged 3.3 yards per carry and had a 7-yard long.
His numbers were modest compared with Skattebo and Dart, but he still contributed to a Giants rushing attack that collectively averaged 4.7 yards per attempt.
Saints Rushing Production
Kendre Miller led New Orleans with 41 rushing yards.
He carried 10 times for 41 yards, averaging 4.1 yards per carry, with a longest run of 11 yards.
Alvin Kamara carried eight times for 27 yards, averaging 3.4 yards per carry. His longest run was 11 yards.
Rattler also contributed 21 rushing yards on six carries, averaging 3.5 yards per attempt.
The Saints did not dominate on the ground statistically. Instead, their rushing attack served as one component of an offense that was more effective through the air and protected the football.
Receiving Stats: Giants
Daniel Bellinger led the Giants in receiving yardage.
He caught four passes for 52 yards on four targets, averaging 13.0 yards per reception. His longest reception was 18 yards.
His efficiency stands out because he produced 52 yards without requiring a large number of targets.
Cam Skattebo
Skattebo caught six passes for 45 yards on seven targets.
His average was 7.5 yards per reception, with a 15-yard long.
His combined rushing and receiving production made him one of the Giants’ most involved offensive players.
Theo Johnson
Theo Johnson produced two touchdowns through the air.
He caught six passes for 33 yards on seven targets, averaging 5.5 yards per reception. His longest reception was 15 yards.
Although his yardage total was lower than Bellinger’s, the two receiving touchdowns gave Johnson an important scoring role.
Darius Slayton
Slayton recorded:
- 3 receptions
- 31 yards
- 6 targets
- 10.3 yards per reception
- 16-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
Wan’Dale Robinson
Robinson caught five passes for 30 yards on seven targets.
He averaged 6.0 yards per reception, with a longest reception of 12 yards.
Giants Team Receiving
As a team, New York recorded:
- 26 receptions
- 202 yards
- 7.8 yards per reception
- 2 touchdowns
- 39 targets
- 18-yard longest reception
The receiving numbers show that New York spread opportunities across several players. The problem was not simply a lack of completed passes. The more significant issue was the inability to maintain scoring production after halftime and the turnover problems that affected possessions.
Saints Receiving Stats
The Saints had the game’s most explosive receiving performance.
Rashid Shaheed caught four passes for 114 yards on five targets.
His average was an outstanding 28.5 yards per reception, and his longest catch covered 87 yards.
He also scored one touchdown.
That single 87-yard reception dramatically changed the statistical profile of the Saints’ passing attack.
Rashid Shaheed’s Explosive Impact
Shaheed’s four receptions accounted for nearly half of New Orleans’ receiving yardage.
That is a critical detail when evaluating the Saints’ offensive performance.
The Saints did not need a huge number of completions to produce 244 passing yards. One explosive play provided a substantial portion of the total.
His final line was:
- 4 receptions
- 114 yards
- 28.5 average
- 1 touchdown
- 87-yard long
- 5 targets
This was arguably the most explosive individual offensive performance in the game.
Chris Olave
Chris Olave led New Orleans in receptions.
He caught seven passes for 59 yards on 11 targets.
His average was 8.4 yards per reception, with a longest reception of 17 yards.
Olave’s 11 targets were the highest individual target total listed for either team.
That indicates how consistently New Orleans involved him in the passing game.
Alvin Kamara
Kamara caught four passes for 28 yards on six targets.
He averaged 7.0 yards per reception, with a 12-yard long.
His receiving role added another dimension to an offense that already featured Shaheed and Olave.
Juwan Johnson
Johnson caught two passes for 17 yards on four targets.
His average was 8.5 yards per reception, with a 19-yard long.
Saints Team Receiving
New Orleans finished with:
- 22 receptions
- 244 yards
- 11.6 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
- 31 targets
- 87-yard longest reception
The most striking comparison is efficiency.
New York completed more passes and had more receptions, but New Orleans averaged 11.6 yards per reception compared with 7.8 for the Giants.
That difference shows how the Saints generated more explosive gains despite making fewer receptions.
Defensive Player Stats
Defense played a major role in the outcome.
The Giants recorded 66 total tackles, including 43 solo tackles. They had seven tackles for loss, three passes defended, and one quarterback hit.
The Saints recorded 72 tackles, 45 solo tackles, two tackles for loss, seven passes defended, five quarterback hits, one sack, and one defensive touchdown.
Bobby Okereke Leads New York
Bobby Okereke recorded 10 tackles, including five solo tackles.
He was the Giants’ leading tackler.
Darius Muasau finished with nine tackles, six solo tackles, and one tackle for loss.
Paulson Adebo recorded six tackles, all six of them solo, along with one tackle for loss.
Pete Werner Leads New Orleans
Pete Werner led all listed defenders with 11 tackles.
He recorded five solo tackles and one quarterback hit.
Demario Davis added 10 tackles, including seven solo tackles and one pass defense.
Alontae Taylor recorded eight tackles, four of them solo.
The Saints also generated five quarterback hits compared with one from New York.
That pressure difference is noteworthy when considering the passing performances.
Kool-Aid McKinstry’s Two Interceptions
One of the biggest individual defensive performances came from Kool-Aid McKinstry.
He intercepted Jaxson Dart twice.
Neither interception produced return yardage or a defensive touchdown, but the takeaways still mattered because they ended Giants possessions and gave New Orleans additional opportunities.
The Saints finished with two interceptions while the Giants had none.
This is particularly important when combined with the Giants’ three lost fumbles.
Turnovers Were a Defining Factor
The turnover statistics are arguably the clearest explanation for the final result.
New York recorded three fumbles and lost all three.
The Saints recorded zero fumbles and lost zero.
New York also threw two interceptions.
New Orleans threw none.
That creates a total of five listed Giants turnovers against zero listed Saints turnovers.
The significance of that statistic cannot be overstated.
The Giants produced 338 yards of combined passing and rushing production based on the supplied team figures, while New Orleans produced 332. In other words, the overall yardage totals were surprisingly close.
Yet the Saints won 26-14.
The major difference was possession security.
New Orleans protected the football.
New York did not.
This is an excellent example of why analysts should avoid judging a game exclusively through total yards.
Kicking Performance
Blake Grupe was an important part of the Saints’ scoring.
He converted four of six field-goal attempts and made both extra-point attempts.
He scored 14 points.
His longest successful field goal was 53 yards.
New York’s Jude McAtamney did not attempt a field goal but converted both extra-point attempts for two points.
The kicking totals were therefore:
Giants
- Field goals: 0/0
- Extra points: 2/2
- Total kicking points: 2
Saints
- Field goals: 4/6
- Extra points: 2/2
- Total kicking points: 14
- Long field goal: 53 yards
Grupe’s 14 points represented more than half of New Orleans’ 26 points.
That made the kicking game an important contributor to the final margin.
Special Teams and Return Stats
The Giants recorded five kick returns for 160 yards.
Their average was 32.0 yards per return, with a longest return of 46 yards.
Gunner Olszewski had three returns for 85 yards, averaging 28.3 yards per return, with a 34-yard long.
Deonte Banks had two returns for 75 yards, averaging 37.5 yards per return, with a 46-yard long.
The Saints had two kick returns for 27 yards.
Kendre Miller returned one kickoff for 18 yards, while Velus Jones Jr. had one for 9 yards.
Neither team recorded a punt return.
The Giants therefore had a clear statistical advantage in kickoff return yardage, but that advantage did not translate into a victory.
Punting Comparison
Jamie Gillan punted twice for New York for a total of 75 yards.
His average was 37.5 yards, with two punts inside the 20-yard line.
Kai Kroeger punted twice for New Orleans for 83 yards.
His average was 41.5 yards, with a longest punt of 51 yards.
Neither team recorded a touchback on the listed punts.
Why the Giants Lost Despite Running for More Yards
This is one of the most useful lessons from the New York Giants vs New Orleans Saints Match Player Stats.
New York had:
- 136 rushing yards
- 202 passing yards
- 338 combined yards from those two categories
- 4.7 yards per rushing attempt
- 2 passing touchdowns
New Orleans had:
- 88 rushing yards
- 244 passing yards
- 332 combined yards from those two categories
- 2.9 yards per rushing attempt
- 1 passing touchdown
The Giants actually had six more combined yards based on the supplied passing and rushing totals.
So why did they lose by 12?
1. Turnovers
The Giants lost three fumbles and threw two interceptions.
The Saints had no turnovers listed.
That is the biggest statistical difference.
2. Explosive Passing
New Orleans averaged 11.6 yards per reception.
The Giants averaged 7.8.
Shaheed’s 87-yard reception was the most dramatic example.
3. Second-Half Scoring
New York scored 14 points in the first half and zero afterward.
New Orleans scored 13 points in the second quarter, 3 in the third, and 7 in the fourth.
The Saints continued to score while the Giants’ offense stalled.
4. Defensive Takeaways
McKinstry’s two interceptions directly contributed to the Saints’ turnover advantage.
5. Field-Goal Production
Grupe made four field goals and scored 14 points.
New York did not attempt a field goal according to the supplied data.
What the Box Score Says About the Giants’ Offense
The Giants’ offense was not completely ineffective.
The 136 rushing yards were a strong number, and Dart added 55 rushing yards himself.
The passing game also produced two touchdowns.
The receiving workload was distributed among several players, with Bellinger, Skattebo, Johnson, Slayton, and Robinson all making meaningful contributions.
However, the offense had difficulty turning yardage into sustained scoring.
The fact that New York went scoreless in both the third and fourth quarters is particularly important.
The two interceptions and three lost fumbles further reduced the team’s ability to capitalize on its offensive production.
What the Box Score Says About the Saints’ Offense
The Saints’ offense was more efficient in the passing game.
Rattler averaged 7.5 yards per attempt and finished without an interception.
Shaheed provided a major explosive element with 114 receiving yards and an 87-yard touchdown reception.
Olave was consistently involved with 11 targets and seven receptions.
The rushing attack was not particularly efficient at 2.9 yards per carry, but it did not need to dominate because the passing game generated larger gains.
The Saints also supplemented their offensive touchdowns with four successful field goals.
Most Important Individual Performers
Rashid Shaheed
Shaheed’s 114 receiving yards and 87-yard touchdown made him one of the biggest difference-makers.
Kool-Aid McKinstry
Two interceptions gave the Saints critical defensive takeaways.
Blake Grupe
Four field goals and two extra points produced 14 points.
Spencer Rattler
Rattler’s 225 passing yards, one touchdown, and zero interceptions represented an efficient quarterback performance.
Chris Olave
Seven receptions on 11 targets gave Olave a consistent role in the passing attack.
Pete Werner
Werner led the game in the listed tackle totals with 11.
Jaxson Dart
Dart combined 202 passing yards with 55 rushing yards and two passing touchdowns, but his two interceptions were costly.
Cam Skattebo
Skattebo contributed both as a runner and receiver, producing 59 rushing yards and 45 receiving yards.
Key Statistical Lessons From the Game
The New York Giants vs New Orleans Saints Match Player Stats provide several useful lessons for evaluating NFL games.
Total Yardage Is Not Enough
The Giants actually produced slightly more combined passing and rushing yardage from the supplied team totals.
That did not matter because New Orleans was much better at protecting possessions.
Explosive Plays Can Outweigh Volume
The Saints had fewer receptions but averaged 11.6 yards per reception.
Shaheed’s 87-yard touchdown was particularly influential.
Turnovers Can Reverse the Statistical Picture
Five listed Giants turnovers compared with zero for New Orleans created a huge difference in possession quality.
Kicking Can Supply a Large Portion of a Winning Score
Grupe’s 14 points represented a major part of the Saints’ 26-point total.
Second-Half Performance Matters
New York scored 14 points before halftime but none afterward.
New Orleans continued scoring in every quarter after the first.
That second-half contrast was central to the outcome.
New York Giants vs New Orleans Saints Match Player Stats: Biggest Takeaways
When the numbers are considered together, the game was not simply a case of one team gaining dramatically more yardage.
The Giants had a productive rushing attack and moved the ball through several receivers. Dart added significant rushing yardage, while Skattebo contributed in both the running and receiving games. Theo Johnson also provided two touchdown receptions.
The Saints, however, were more efficient in several critical areas.
Rattler avoided interceptions. Shaheed produced an enormous explosive play. Olave consistently received targets. McKinstry intercepted Dart twice. The Saints protected their own possessions and converted four field goals.
That combination allowed New Orleans to win despite having fewer rushing yards and slightly fewer combined passing and rushing yards in the supplied figures.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Giants and Saints?
The New Orleans Saints defeated the New York Giants 26-14 on October 5, 2025.
Who was the leading passer?
Spencer Rattler led the Saints with 225 passing yards on 21 completions from 31 attempts. Jaxson Dart threw for 202 yards for New York.
Who was the leading receiver?
Rashid Shaheed led the game with 114 receiving yards. He caught four passes, including an 87-yard touchdown.
Who led the Giants in rushing?
Cam Skattebo led the Giants’ listed traditional rushing production with 59 yards on 15 carries. Jaxson Dart added 55 rushing yards.
How many turnovers did the Giants have?
The Giants lost three fumbles and threw two interceptions, giving them five listed turnovers. The Saints had zero listed turnovers.
Who had the most tackles?
Pete Werner led the listed defenders with 11 tackles for New Orleans. Bobby Okereke led the Giants with 10 tackles.
Conclusion
The New York Giants vs New Orleans Saints Match Player Stats show why a complete game analysis requires more than looking at the final score or total yardage.
New York generated 136 rushing yards and 202 passing yards, while New Orleans produced 88 rushing yards and 244 passing yards. The Giants also received two touchdown passes from Jaxson Dart and strong contributions from players such as Cam Skattebo, Daniel Bellinger, and Theo Johnson.
However, New Orleans controlled the most decisive statistical areas. Spencer Rattler avoided interceptions, Rashid Shaheed delivered an 87-yard touchdown reception, Kool-Aid McKinstry intercepted Dart twice, and Blake Grupe contributed 14 points with his kicking.
The turnover margin was particularly important. New York lost three fumbles and threw two interceptions, while New Orleans did not turn the ball over in the supplied statistics.
The scoring pattern tells the same story. The Giants scored 14 points in the first half but failed to score after halftime. The Saints continued adding points and finished with a 26-14 victory.
Ultimately, the box score presents a useful lesson in NFL efficiency: a team can run the ball better and finish with comparable overall yardage yet still lose decisively when turnovers, explosive plays, quarterback efficiency, and scoring opportunities go against it.
