Carolina Panthers vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats
The Carolina Panthers vs Arizona Cardinals match player stats tell a much more interesting story than the final score alone. Carolina defeated Arizona 33-30 in the 2026 Pro Football Hall of Fame Game, but the box score reveals several different narratives developing at the same time. Carson Beck looked composed and efficient in his NFL debut, Haynes King produced a strong response for Carolina, Arizona’s passing attack created more explosive yardage, and several depth players made meaningful cases for roster consideration.
The game was played at Tom Benson Hall of Fame Stadium in Canton, Ohio. Official NFL records list the Hall of Fame Game as August 6, 2026 in the United States, which corresponds to August 7 in Pakistan. Carolina scored 17 points in the second quarter and 16 in the fourth, while Arizona answered with 17 points in the second and 10 in the fourth. The Panthers ultimately won on Haynes King’s five-yard rushing touchdown as time expired.
For readers studying player performance rather than simply looking for a final score, this matchup provides several useful lessons. Preseason statistics must be read differently from regular-season statistics because playing time, personnel combinations, play calling, and roster competition all influence the numbers.
This article breaks down the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, kicking, return and turnover statistics, then explains what those numbers actually suggest about the players involved.
Carolina Panthers vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats
The headline result was straightforward:
| Category | Carolina Panthers | Arizona Cardinals |
| Final score | 33 | 30 |
| Passing | 237 yards | 282 yards |
| Rushing | 141 yards | 141 yards |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Total sacks allowed | 1 | 2 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Receiving yards | 242 | 294 |
| Total tackles | 83 | 65 |
| Field goals | 2/2 | 3/3 |
| Extra points | 3/3 | 3/3 |
One of the first things that stands out is that Arizona actually generated more passing and receiving yardage. The Cardinals finished with 282 passing yards compared with Carolina’s 237, while their receivers accumulated 294 yards compared with Carolina’s 242.
Yet Carolina won.
That is an important reminder that yardage totals do not automatically determine the outcome of a football game. Carolina’s offense converted its opportunities into four touchdowns, including two on the ground. Arizona had two passing touchdowns and one rushing touchdown, with its remaining points coming from field goals.
The Panthers also protected the football better in the most important category. Neither team threw an interception, but Carolina’s only recorded fumble lost came from Anthony Tyus III. Arizona had fumbles by Bam Knight and Xavier Weaver, but neither was lost.
The official NFL game center confirms the 33-30 final score and the quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern.
Game Context and Why the Numbers Matter
The Hall of Fame Game is unusual because it serves several purposes simultaneously.
It is a preseason contest, but it also provides the first nationally visible opportunity for many players competing for roster spots. Established starters often receive limited or no playing time, while rookies, backups and players fighting for depth-chart positions receive extended opportunities.
That context is essential when evaluating the statistics from this game.
A quarterback completing 15 of 19 passes for 188 yards against a mixture of backup defenders is not producing the same evidence as a quarterback posting the same numbers against a regular-season starting defense.
At the same time, preseason performances should not be dismissed.
Players still have to execute.
They still have to process defensive looks, deliver accurate passes, protect the football, create separation, tackle effectively and make decisions under pressure.
That is why the individual performances in this game matter most when viewed as evidence of specific traits rather than as direct predictions of regular-season production.
Carson Beck’s accuracy and pocket control were particularly notable. NFL.com’s analysis described him as comfortable in his first NFL appearance and highlighted his ability to handle different types of throws.
Haynes King offered a different kind of impact for Carolina. His passing was productive, but his mobility became a major part of the fourth-quarter story.
Carolina Passing Performance
Carolina used Kenny Pickett and Haynes King at quarterback.
Haynes King
Haynes King delivered the strongest statistical performance among Carolina quarterbacks:
- 21 completions
- 34 attempts
- 180 passing yards
- 5.3 yards per attempt
- 2 passing touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 0 sacks recorded against him
- 95.2 passer rating
- 39 rushing yards
- 1 rushing touchdown
The most important part of King’s performance was not simply his 180 passing yards.
It was his ability to add value with his legs.
King averaged 13.0 yards per rushing attempt on his three recorded carries, although one long run heavily influenced that average. His 26-yard run demonstrated the type of explosive mobility that can change a drive even when the passing game is not producing consistently.
His final five-yard touchdown run provided the game’s decisive moment.
NFL.com’s postgame analysis specifically highlighted King’s mobility and described him as appearing more comfortable than Pickett during the contest.
That does not automatically mean King should be considered a future starter. It does mean his skill set created a noticeable contrast.
Kenny Pickett
Pickett finished with:
- 8 completions
- 11 attempts
- 62 passing yards
- 5.6 yards per attempt
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 1 sack
- 86.2 passer rating
Pickett’s sample was considerably smaller than King’s, so directly comparing their raw statistics requires caution.
The important observation is that Pickett did not have a disastrous performance. He completed 72.7 percent of his passes and avoided turnovers.
However, King generated more explosive plays and became more influential as the game progressed.
That distinction matters in a preseason competition because coaches are not simply looking for completion percentage. They are evaluating decision-making, command of the offense, pocket movement, athletic ability and how a player responds when the game becomes uncomfortable.
Carolina Quarterback Team Totals
As a team, Carolina quarterbacks combined for:
- 29 completions
- 45 attempts
- 237 passing yards
- 5.4 yards per attempt
- 2 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 1 sack
- 93.0 passer rating
The zero-interception figure is particularly useful because turnovers can distort preseason evaluations.
Carolina’s quarterbacks gave the offense opportunities to remain aggressive without putting the defense in repeated short-field situations.
Arizona Passing Performance
Arizona’s passing numbers were one of the most impressive statistical areas of the game.
Carson Beck
Carson Beck completed:
- 15 of 19 passes
- 188 yards
- 9.9 yards per attempt
- 1 touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 1 sack
- 125.4 passer rating
Those numbers are excellent for a debut.
His 78.9 percent completion rate combined with nearly 10 yards per attempt is particularly notable because it shows that his efficiency was not simply built on short checkdowns.
NFL.com’s coverage pointed to his ability to make short, intermediate and deep throws while operating calmly within the offense.
Beck’s touchdown pass to Simi Fehoko was also an important part of the performance. The throw demonstrated touch and accuracy rather than simply relying on a receiver to win after the catch.
The bigger takeaway is that Beck looked comfortable.
For a rookie quarterback, that is often one of the most useful early indicators to watch.
Kedon Slovis
Slovis added:
- 9 completions
- 10 attempts
- 106 yards
- 10.6 yards per attempt
- 1 touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 1 sack
- 144.2 passer rating
His statistical efficiency was even higher than Beck’s, although his sample was smaller.
Slovis completed 90 percent of his passes and averaged more than 10 yards per attempt. Those are excellent numbers, but they should not be interpreted without considering the number of attempts.
A ten-pass sample can reveal accuracy and efficiency, but it cannot provide the same amount of evidence as 19 attempts.
Arizona Quarterback Team Totals
Arizona quarterbacks combined for:
- 24 completions
- 29 attempts
- 282 yards
- 10.1 yards per attempt
- 2 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 2 sacks
- 131.9 passer rating
That 10.1-yard average per attempt was the most striking team passing statistic of the night.
Arizona was able to generate bigger gains through the air than Carolina.
That becomes even more interesting when the receiving statistics are considered.
Carolina Rushing Attack
Carolina finished with 141 rushing yards on 22 attempts.
That produced an impressive 6.4 yards per carry.
The Panthers also scored two rushing touchdowns.
Miles Davis
Miles Davis led Carolina’s rushing group in yards:
- 4 carries
- 53 yards
- 13.3 yards per carry
- 36-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
The 36-yard run was Carolina’s longest rushing play of the game.
Davis did not receive a large workload, but his efficiency was obvious. Four carries are not enough to establish a long-term conclusion, yet 53 yards from those opportunities demonstrate explosive ability.
Haynes King
King added:
- 3 carries
- 39 yards
- 13.0 yards per carry
- 26-yard long
- 1 touchdown
His rushing touchdown became the deciding play.
That makes King’s performance particularly valuable because he affected the game in multiple ways.
Anthony Tyus III
Tyus recorded:
- 8 carries
- 19 yards
- 2.4 yards per carry
- 7-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
He also recorded Carolina’s only lost fumble.
This is an example of why box scores need context.
Tyus received the largest number of rushing attempts among Carolina backs, but his efficiency was substantially lower than Davis and King.
AJ Dillon
Dillon finished with:
- 3 carries
- 18 yards
- 6.0 yards per carry
- 13-yard long
- 1 touchdown
He also caught a pass for 18 yards.
Dillon’s limited workload still produced several positive moments, including his rushing touchdown.
Trevor Etienne
Etienne had:
- 4 carries
- 12 yards
- 3.0 yards per carry
- 7-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
His workload was limited, making it difficult to draw major conclusions from the numbers alone.
Arizona Rushing Attack
Arizona also finished with 141 rushing yards, exactly matching Carolina’s total.
The difference was efficiency.
Arizona needed 34 carries to reach 141 yards, producing 4.2 yards per carry.
Bam Knight
Knight recorded:
- 12 carries
- 58 yards
- 5.0 yards per carry
- 13-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
His workload was the largest among Arizona running backs.
The 5.0-yard average suggests a solid performance, particularly considering the amount of work he received.
NFL.com’s analysis also identified Knight as one of Arizona’s more interesting depth players following the game.
Corey Kiner
Kiner had:
- 14 carries
- 57 yards
- 4.1 yards per carry
- 13-yard long
- 1 touchdown
He also added two receptions for nine yards.
Kiner therefore contributed in both phases.
Evan Hull
Hull recorded:
- 6 carries
- 23 yards
- 3.8 yards per carry
- 9-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
Carson Beck
Beck added:
- 2 carries
- 3 yards
- 1.5 yards per carry
- 4-yard long
The contrast between the two teams is revealing.
Both produced exactly 141 rushing yards, but Carolina did it on 12 fewer attempts.
That means Carolina generated considerably more rushing efficiency.
Carolina Receiving Statistics
Carolina’s receivers combined for:
- 29 receptions
- 242 yards
- 8.3 yards per reception
- 2 touchdowns
- 44 targets
- 21-yard long
Jimmy Horn Jr.
Horn led Carolina in receiving yardage:
- 4 receptions
- 44 yards
- 11.0 yards per reception
- 17-yard long
- 7 targets
He was also a prominent target for King.
Horn’s seven targets were tied to his role in the passing offense rather than merely his final yardage total.
John Metchie III
Metchie recorded:
- 3 receptions
- 38 yards
- 12.7 yards per reception
- 19-yard long
- 6 targets
He was particularly important during Carolina’s offensive rhythm in the first half.
His 38 yards came on only three receptions, giving him a strong 12.7-yard average.
Ja’Seem Reed
Reed posted:
- 2 receptions
- 30 yards
- 15.0 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
- 15-yard long
- 3 targets
His touchdown was one of the clearest positive moments among Carolina’s young receiving options.
Casey Washington
Washington finished with:
- 3 receptions
- 24 yards
- 8.0 yards per reception
- 10-yard long
- 5 targets
Caden Prieskorn
Prieskorn had only one reception, but it went for 21 yards.
That gave him the highest yards-per-reception figure among the listed Carolina players at 21.0.
The important point is that a small sample can still reveal the ability to create a chunk play.
Arizona Receiving Statistics
Arizona’s receiving group produced more yardage than Carolina’s.
The Cardinals finished with:
- 24 receptions
- 294 yards
- 12.3 yards per reception
- 2 touchdowns
- 28 targets
- 49-yard long
That 12.3-yard average was a major reason Arizona’s passing offense looked explosive.
Jalen Brooks
Brooks was the biggest statistical standout.
He recorded:
- 3 receptions
- 99 yards
- 33.0 yards per reception
- 49-yard long
- 4 targets
His 99 yards accounted for roughly one-third of Arizona’s entire receiving total.
The 49-yard reception was also the longest catch of the game.
Three receptions for 99 yards is a classic example of why total receiving yardage should be paired with efficiency.
Brooks was not heavily targeted, but when the ball came his way, he created major gains.
Reggie Virgil
Virgil recorded:
- 5 receptions
- 66 yards
- 13.2 yards per reception
- 17-yard long
- 6 targets
He led Arizona in receptions and ranked second in receiving yardage.
That combination makes him one of the more complete statistical performers among Arizona’s receivers.
Harrison Wallace III
Wallace added:
- 2 receptions
- 34 yards
- 17.0 yards per reception
- 27-yard long
- 2 targets
He also returned two kicks for 49 yards.
Xavier Weaver
Weaver posted:
- 3 receptions
- 31 yards
- 10.3 yards per reception
- 19-yard long
- 5 targets
He also returned a punt for seven yards and a kickoff for 25 yards.
Carolina Panthers vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats: Defensive Breakdown
The defensive numbers offer another interesting contrast.
Carolina recorded:
- 83 total tackles
- 38 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 3 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 2 quarterback hits
- 0 defensive touchdowns
Arizona recorded:
- 65 total tackles
- 37 solo tackles
- 5 tackles for loss
- 1 sack
- 4 passes defended
- 2 quarterback hits
- 0 defensive touchdowns
Carolina’s defense recorded more total tackles and twice as many sacks.
Arizona, however, produced more tackles for loss and passes defended.
Carolina’s Leading Tackler
Zakee Wheatley led Carolina with eight total tackles.
He recorded:
- 8 total tackles
- 2 solo tackles
His eight tackles show that he was consistently involved in defensive action.
Carolina Sacks
Nick Hampton recorded one sack.
Demani Richardson recorded one sack.
Those two sacks helped Carolina pressure Arizona’s quarterbacks without relying on turnovers.
Arizona’s Leading Tackler
Austin Keys led the Cardinals with:
- 11 total tackles
- 7 solo tackles
- 1 tackle for loss
- 2 passes defended
Eleven tackles was the highest individual tackle total listed for either team.
That level of involvement made Keys one of Arizona’s most active defenders.
Arizona Sack
Andrew Billings recorded Arizona’s lone sack.
The Cardinals also generated two quarterback hits.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers did not dominate this game.
Neither team recorded an interception.
That is significant because both passing groups attempted multiple throws without putting the ball directly into the opposing secondary’s hands.
Carolina had one lost fumble from Anthony Tyus III.
Arizona had fumbles credited to Bam Knight and Xavier Weaver, but neither was lost.
Arizona also recovered one fumble through Isaiah Oliver.
This created an unusual statistical situation.
Carolina won despite losing a fumble, while Arizona avoided losing either of its recorded fumbles.
That reinforces how closely contested the game was.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams quietly played an important role.
Carolina Kicking
Ryan Fitzgerald was perfect:
- 2 field goals made
- 2 field goals attempted
- 100 percent
- 37-yard long
- 3 extra points
- 9 total points
Arizona Kicking
Chad Ryland also went perfect:
- 3 field goals made
- 3 attempts
- 100 percent
- 43-yard long
- 3 extra points
- 12 total points
Arizona therefore received three more kicking points than Carolina.
That makes Carolina’s four touchdowns particularly important because the Panthers needed fewer field goals to reach 33 points.
Carolina Kick Returns
Carolina returned four kickoffs for:
- 114 yards
- 28.5-yard average
- 36-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
John Metchie III returned one for 36 yards.
Anthony Tyus III returned one for 27 yards.
Ja’Seem Reed returned one for 26 yards.
Jimmy Horn Jr. returned one for 25 yards.
Arizona Kick Returns
Arizona had:
- 3 returns
- 74 yards
- 24.7-yard average
- 29-yard long
- 0 touchdowns
Harrison Wallace III handled two returns for 49 yards.
Xavier Weaver added a 25-yard return.
Punting
Carolina’s Sam Martin punted twice for 117 yards, averaging 58.5 yards per punt.
His longest punt traveled 61 yards, and one finished inside the 20-yard line.
Arizona’s Blake Gillikin punted once for 55 yards, with the ball also finishing inside the 20.
What the Numbers Say About Carson Beck
The most obvious individual storyline from Arizona was Carson Beck.
- His 15-of-19 passing line was efficient.
- His 188 yards were substantial.
- His 125.4 passer rating was excellent.
Most importantly, he did not look overwhelmed by the speed of the professional game.
That does not guarantee future success.
Preseason defenses are not always representative of regular-season opponents, and one game is an extremely small sample.
Still, there are specific things worth watching.
Beck demonstrated:
- Accuracy on intermediate throws.
- Willingness to attack downfield.
- Pocket composure.
- Ball security.
- Ability to execute within the offensive structure.
- Touch on scoring opportunities.
NFL.com’s analysis described his first NFL appearance as highly encouraging and noted his ability to make different types of throws from the pocket.
For evaluators, those traits are more meaningful than simply saying he had a high passer rating.
What the Numbers Say About Haynes King
King created the most consequential performance for Carolina.
His passing line was solid rather than spectacular.
His rushing production made the difference.
He finished with 180 passing yards, two passing touchdowns, 39 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown.
That means he accounted for three total touchdowns.
His mobility also helped him extend plays.
This matters because quarterbacks who can create outside the structure of the offense give coaches another way to attack defensive pressure.
NFL.com’s postgame assessment specifically highlighted King’s mobility and suggested that his skill set could make the quarterback competition more interesting.
Again, that is not the same as predicting that King will immediately become a starter.
The more reasonable conclusion is that he created a compelling preseason case for additional opportunities.
The Biggest Statistical Difference Between the Teams
The most interesting statistical contrast is efficiency.
Arizona passed for 282 yards to Carolina’s 237.
Both teams rushed for 141 yards.
Arizona therefore produced 423 combined passing and rushing yards, while Carolina produced 378.
Yet Carolina won.
Why?
Touchdown distribution and late-game execution were major factors.
Carolina scored four touchdowns.
Arizona scored three.
The Panthers also converted their decisive late possession into a touchdown.
That is a useful lesson for anyone studying football statistics.
A team can lose the yardage battle and still win comfortably enough if it produces more points per scoring opportunity.
Why Arizona’s Receiving Numbers Stand Out
Arizona’s receiving group deserves special attention.
The Cardinals averaged 12.3 yards per reception as a team.
Carolina averaged 8.3.
That is a four-yard difference every time a completed pass reached a receiver on average.
Jalen Brooks was the clearest example.
His 33.0 yards per reception were extraordinary.
Three receptions produced 99 yards.
Reggie Virgil also delivered a strong combination of volume and efficiency with five catches for 66 yards.
This suggests that Arizona’s passing attack was capable of creating explosive plays even though the team ultimately lost.
Why Carolina’s Rushing Numbers Stand Out
Carolina’s 6.4 yards per carry was considerably stronger than Arizona’s 4.2.
The Panthers reached 141 rushing yards on 22 attempts.
Arizona required 34 attempts for the same yardage.
That difference matters.
Carolina needed fewer rushing attempts to generate the same amount of production.
Miles Davis’ 53 yards on four attempts were particularly explosive, while King added 39 yards on three attempts.
AJ Dillon also averaged 6.0 yards per carry.
This was not a dominant rushing performance from one heavily used running back.
It was a collection of efficient contributions.
What This Game Means for Roster Battles
Preseason games are often most useful for evaluating players fighting for roles.
The game offered several examples.
For Carolina, the quarterback situation gained an interesting dimension because King provided a different style from Pickett.
The receiving competition also became more difficult to evaluate because several players produced useful moments without completely separating themselves.
Jimmy Horn Jr. led the Panthers in receiving yardage.
Metchie produced efficient receiving numbers.
Ja’Seem Reed scored a touchdown.
That means the competition cannot be evaluated solely by total yardage.
Coaches will also consider blocking, special teams value, route discipline, drops, separation, assignment reliability and consistency during practice.
For Arizona, Beck’s performance naturally drew attention.
Knight also made a case as a useful depth running back, while Brooks and Virgil demonstrated explosive receiving ability.
Carolina Panthers vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
Several conclusions stand out from the complete statistical picture.
1. Carolina won through touchdowns and late execution
Arizona generated more total yardage, but Carolina produced one more touchdown.
The final possession ultimately decided the game.
2. Carson Beck had the strongest pure passing efficiency
His 15-of-19 performance for 188 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions produced a 125.4 passer rating.
3. Haynes King had the biggest overall impact
King combined 180 passing yards, two passing touchdowns, 39 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown.
4. Arizona created more explosive receiving production
The Cardinals averaged 12.3 yards per reception, led by Jalen Brooks’ 33.0-yard average.
5. Carolina was more efficient on the ground
Both teams rushed for 141 yards, but Carolina did it on 22 attempts compared with Arizona’s 34.
6. Neither secondary recorded an interception
Both teams protected the passing game relatively well.
7. Special teams were reliable
Both kickers were perfect on field goals and extra points.
8. Depth players created meaningful evaluation points
The Hall of Fame Game was not simply about the final score. It provided evidence for ongoing roster decisions.
How to Read Preseason Player Statistics Correctly
It is tempting to look at a stat line and immediately rank players.
That can be misleading.
A better approach is to divide preseason statistics into three categories.
Production
This includes yards, touchdowns, tackles, sacks, completions and other measurable outcomes.
Production tells you what happened.
Efficiency
This includes yards per attempt, completion percentage, yards per carry, yards per reception and similar measurements.
Efficiency helps explain how effectively a player produced.
Context
Context includes:
- Number of snaps
- Quality of teammates
- Quality of opponents
- Offensive scheme
- Field position
- Game situation
- Role within the roster
- Whether the player was facing starters or backups
The context explains why the numbers happened.
For example, Beck’s 125.4 passer rating is impressive.
But the deeper question is whether his accuracy, pocket movement and decision-making remain consistent when he faces more complicated defensive pressure.
Likewise, King’s 13.0 yards per rushing attempt is exciting, but three carries are not enough to establish a reliable rushing baseline.
This approach produces a more responsible interpretation of football statistics.
Official Game Information
The official NFL game center records the Hall of Fame Game at Tom Benson Hall of Fame Stadium in Canton, Ohio, with Carolina winning 33-30. The official scoring breakdown shows Carolina scoring 17 points in the second quarter and 16 in the fourth, while Arizona scored 17 in the second, three in the third and 10 in the fourth.
For readers who want to verify the complete box score, play-by-play information and official game details, the NFL game center is the most appropriate primary reference.
FAQs About Carolina Panthers vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats
Who won the Panthers vs Cardinals Hall of Fame Game?
The Carolina Panthers defeated the Arizona Cardinals 33-30 in the 2026 Hall of Fame Game. The Panthers scored the winning touchdown on the final play of the game.
How did Haynes King perform for the Panthers?
Haynes King completed 21 of 34 passes for 180 yards and two touchdowns without an interception. He also rushed for 39 yards and one touchdown.
How did Carson Beck perform in his NFL debut?
Carson Beck completed 15 of 19 passes for 188 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions. He finished with a 125.4 passer rating.
Who was the leading receiver for Carolina?
Jimmy Horn Jr. led Carolina in receiving yardage with four catches for 44 yards. John Metchie III had three catches for 38 yards, while Ja’Seem Reed caught two passes for 30 yards and a touchdown.
Who led Arizona in receiving?
Jalen Brooks led Arizona with 99 receiving yards on three catches. He averaged 33.0 yards per reception and recorded the game’s longest reception of 49 yards.
Did either team throw an interception?
No. Neither Carolina nor Arizona recorded an interception during the game.
Conclusion
The Carolina Panthers vs Arizona Cardinals match player stats provide a much deeper picture than the 33-30 final score.
Arizona’s passing offense was more productive in terms of yardage, with 282 passing yards and 294 receiving yards. Carson Beck delivered an especially efficient debut, completing 15 of 19 passes for 188 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions.
Carolina answered with a more efficient rushing attack and stronger touchdown production. The Panthers gained 141 rushing yards on only 22 attempts and scored two rushing touchdowns. Haynes King became the central figure in the late stages of the game, combining his passing production with 39 rushing yards and the game-winning five-yard touchdown run.
The receiving statistics also reveal two different offensive identities. Arizona generated explosive passing plays, highlighted by Jalen Brooks’ 99 receiving yards and 49-yard catch. Carolina spread its receiving production among several players, with Jimmy Horn Jr., John Metchie III and Ja’Seem Reed all contributing.
Defensively, Carolina recorded two sacks compared with Arizona’s one, while Arizona produced five tackles for loss. Neither team intercepted a pass.
The most useful conclusion is not that one preseason performance determines a player’s future. It does not. The value of this game lies in identifying traits worth monitoring as the preseason continues.
For Arizona, Carson Beck’s accuracy, composure and downfield passing created one of the most encouraging stories of the night. For Carolina, Haynes King’s mobility and late-game production gave the coaching staff another reason to evaluate his role closely.
That is ultimately why detailed player statistics matter. They turn a final score into a more complete explanation of how the game unfolded and which individual performances deserve further attention.
