Philadelphia Eagles vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats tell the story of a defensive battle that finished with Philadelphia winning 10-7 at Lambeau Field on November 10, 2025. The Eagles improved to 7-2, while Green Bay moved to 5-3-1. Although neither offense produced a large statistical total, Philadelphia made the most important plays when the game was on the line.
The final score was unusually low for two teams with strong offensive talent. Philadelphia produced 294 total yards, compared with 261 for Green Bay. The Eagles also controlled possession for 32:05 and converted 7 of 16 third downs. Green Bay had more first downs, 18 to 13, but could not turn that advantage into enough points.
Jalen Hurts completed 15 of 26 passes for 183 yards and one touchdown. Jordan Love completed 20 of 36 passes for 176 yards and no touchdowns. The difference was not simply passing volume. Philadelphia protected Hurts from being sacked, while Green Bay allowed three sacks for 19 yards. That helped the Eagles maintain offensive efficiency despite a modest rushing performance.
Philadelphia Eagles vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats
The most important individual numbers from the game are below.
| Category | Philadelphia Eagles | Green Bay Packers |
| Final Score | 10 | 7 |
| Total Yards | 294 | 261 |
| Passing Yards | 183 | 157 net |
| Rushing Yards | 111 | 104 |
| Passing Attempts | 26 | 36 |
| Completions | 15 | 20 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks Allowed | 0 | 3 |
| Third Down | 7/16 | 5/13 |
| Turnovers Lost | 1 | 2 |
| Time of Possession | 32:05 | 27:55 |
The statistics show why the game was so close. Green Bay actually recorded more first downs and ran six more offensive plays. Philadelphia, however, gained more total yards and committed fewer turnovers. The Eagles also generated eight quarterback hits and three sacks while keeping Hurts clean.
That combination is important because close NFL games are often decided by efficiency rather than raw volume.
Jalen Hurts Passing Performance
Jalen Hurts completed 15 of 26 attempts for 183 yards. He averaged 7.0 yards per attempt and threw one touchdown without an interception. His official passer rating was 92.3, while his QBR was 33.6.
The passing line was not spectacular, but it was effective enough for the Eagles to win.
Hurts also avoided a sack, which was particularly important against a Green Bay defense that needed negative plays to create longer third downs. The Eagles offensive line gave him enough time to make throws without allowing Green Bay to record a sack.
His most productive passing connection was with DeVonta Smith.
Smith caught four passes for 69 yards and one touchdown. His 36-yard reception was also the longest Eagles reception of the game. He averaged 17.3 yards per catch, making him Philadelphia’s most explosive receiver.
Dallas Goedert added four catches for 43 yards. Saquon Barkley caught three passes for 41 yards, including a 41-yard reception that provided an important chunk of Philadelphia’s receiving production.
According to the official individual statistics, Philadelphia completed 15 passes for 183 yards and one touchdown.
Jordan Love Passing Performance
Jordan Love completed more passes than Hurts, finishing 20 of 36 for 176 gross passing yards.
However, the efficiency gap was significant.
Love finished without a touchdown or interception. He was also sacked three times for 19 yards, reducing his net passing output to 157 yards. His passer rating was 68.8, with a QBR of 42.5.
The numbers show an interesting contrast.
Love completed 55.6 percent of his passes, while Hurts completed 57.7 percent. Green Bay therefore had a small advantage in completion volume but did not generate enough explosive production.
Christian Watson led the Packers in receiving yards with 45 yards on two catches. His average of 22.5 yards per reception showed his big-play ability.
Dontayvion Wicks led Green Bay in receptions with four. He finished with 38 yards on eight targets.
Josh Jacobs was also heavily involved as a receiver. He caught five passes for 33 yards and added 74 rushing yards.
The problem for Green Bay was that its passing game could not produce a touchdown.
Saquon Barkley Rushing Stats
Saquon Barkley carried the ball 22 times for 60 yards.
His 2.7 yards-per-carry average was modest, and he did not score a rushing touchdown. His longest run was 15 yards.
At first glance, this looks like a disappointing rushing performance. However, the value of Barkley’s workload goes beyond his average.
Philadelphia continued to use him throughout the game. That forced Green Bay to respect the running game and helped the Eagles maintain balance.
Barkley also contributed as a receiver.
He caught three passes for 41 yards, including a 41-yard reception. That gave him 101 combined rushing and receiving yards.
This is one of the most useful insights when studying the philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats. Barkley did not dominate on the ground, but his overall contribution was still significant.
Philadelphia finished with 34 rushing attempts for 111 yards. Jalen Hurts added 27 yards on five carries, while Will Shipley recorded 17 yards on four attempts.
Josh Jacobs Leads Green Bay’s Rushing Attack
Josh Jacobs was Green Bay’s leading rusher.
He carried 21 times for 74 yards and scored the Packers’ only touchdown. His longest run was 11 yards, and he averaged 3.5 yards per attempt.
Jacobs also caught five passes for 33 yards.
That gave him 107 total yards from scrimmage, making him one of Green Bay’s most productive offensive players.
Jordan Love added 28 rushing yards on five attempts. His 5.6-yard average was higher than Jacobs’ average, although his carries were much fewer.
Green Bay finished with 27 rushing attempts for 104 yards and one touchdown.
The Packers therefore had a slightly better rushing average than Philadelphia, 3.9 yards per attempt compared with 3.3. Yet the Eagles’ offense produced more total yards.
That difference shows why average yards per carry cannot be viewed in isolation.
DeVonta Smith Was Philadelphia’s Top Receiver
DeVonta Smith produced one of the most important individual performances of the game.
He finished with:
- 4 receptions
- 69 receiving yards
- 17.3 yards per reception
- 36-yard longest reception
- 1 touchdown
- 7 targets
Smith accounted for the Eagles’ only receiving touchdown.
His 69 yards represented more than one-third of Philadelphia’s total passing production. He also created the biggest explosive play among Philadelphia’s primary receivers.
Dallas Goedert was next with four receptions for 43 yards.
Barkley finished third in receiving yardage with 41 yards, despite receiving only three targets.
A.J. Brown had two receptions for 13 yards on three targets. His relatively small production was notable because he is normally one of Philadelphia’s biggest offensive weapons.
The distribution shows how Philadelphia found ways to win without relying on one receiver for the entire game.
Green Bay Receiving Statistics
Green Bay completed 20 passes to eight different receivers.
Christian Watson produced 45 yards on two receptions. His 22.5-yard average was easily the highest among the Packers’ main receivers.
Wicks caught four passes for 38 yards and received eight targets, giving him the largest target total on the team.
Jacobs recorded five receptions for 33 yards.
Bo Melton added two catches for 28 yards, while Luke Musgrave caught three passes for 23 yards.
Romeo Doubs finished with one reception for five yards.
The Packers therefore had a relatively broad passing distribution. The issue was not a lack of receivers getting involved. The bigger problem was the inability to convert that activity into touchdowns.
Green Bay finished with 176 gross passing yards and zero passing touchdowns.
Eagles Defense Changed the Game
The strongest unit on the field was Philadelphia’s defense.
The Eagles recorded three sacks, eight quarterback hits, five tackles for loss and five passes defended.
Zack Baun led Philadelphia with eight tackles.
Nakobe Dean recorded seven tackles and one sack. Reed Blankenship also recorded seven tackles.
Jaelan Phillips had six tackles and one tackle for loss.
Jalyx Hunt recorded five tackles, one sack and two tackles for loss.
Those numbers explain why Green Bay struggled to finish drives.
The Eagles did not record an interception, but interceptions were not necessary. Philadelphia created enough pressure and forced enough mistakes to limit Green Bay’s scoring opportunities.
The Packers finished with three team fumbles and lost two of them. Philadelphia had one fumble and lost it.
Turnover margin therefore became one of the game’s most important statistical differences.
Green Bay Defense Kept the Game Close
Green Bay’s defense also performed well.
The Packers recorded 66 tackles, including 35 solo tackles. They produced six tackles for loss but did not record a sack or quarterback hit.
Xavier McKinney and Evan Williams led the team with seven tackles each.
Quay Walker and Isaiah McDuffie each recorded six tackles. Edgerrin Cooper also finished with six tackles.
The lack of sacks was important.
Green Bay’s defense limited Philadelphia’s rushing efficiency, holding the Eagles to 3.3 yards per carry. However, it could not consistently pressure Hurts.
That gave Philadelphia a crucial advantage in passing situations.
Turnovers Became a Deciding Factor
Turnovers were one of the clearest differences in the game.
Philadelphia had one fumble and lost it.
Green Bay had three fumbles and lost two.
Jordan Love was credited with two fumbles and lost one. Josh Jacobs also lost a fumble.
The Eagles recovered two Green Bay fumbles.
There were no interceptions in the game.
The turnover margin therefore favored Philadelphia by two possessions.
That is particularly important in a 10-7 game.
The Eagles did not need to produce 400 yards or dominate every statistical category. They simply needed to avoid giving Green Bay extra opportunities while taking advantage of Green Bay’s mistakes.
The official team statistics confirm Philadelphia lost one turnover while Green Bay lost two.
Third Down Efficiency Favored Philadelphia
Third-down performance was another major factor.
Philadelphia converted 7 of 16 third downs.
That equals 43.8 percent.
Green Bay converted 5 of 13, or 38.5 percent.
The difference may look small, but in a defensive game every successful third-down conversion extends a drive.
Philadelphia also controlled the clock for 32 minutes and five seconds.
Green Bay had possession for 27 minutes and 55 seconds.
The Eagles therefore held the ball for more than four additional minutes.
That helped keep Green Bay’s offense away from the field and allowed Philadelphia to control the game’s rhythm.
Red Zone Execution
Red-zone performance provides another useful explanation for the final score.
Philadelphia went 0 for 1 in the red zone.
Green Bay went 1 for 1.
That might seem to favor Green Bay, but the Packers reached the red zone only once and converted that opportunity into their touchdown.
Philadelphia did not score a touchdown from its red-zone opportunity.
Instead, the Eagles relied on a combination of a touchdown pass and a field goal to reach 10 points.
Jake Elliott converted his only field-goal attempt from 39 yards and made his extra-point attempt.
Brandon McManus made his extra point but missed his only field-goal attempt.
That missed field goal mattered in a game decided by three points.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams were relatively even in several areas.
Philadelphia returned two kickoffs for 51 yards. Xavier Gipson had one return for 27 yards, while Will Shipley returned one for 24.
Green Bay returned three kickoffs for 77 yards. Savion Williams had two returns for 57 yards, while Bo Melton added 20 yards.
Philadelphia also recorded 31 punt-return yards through Xavier Gipson.
Green Bay had 22 punt-return yards through Romeo Doubs.
Punting was almost identical.
Braden Mann averaged 47.6 yards across five punts for Philadelphia.
Daniel Whelan averaged 47.8 yards across five punts for Green Bay.
The small difference in punting therefore did not determine the outcome.
Total Offensive Comparison
The overall offensive statistics reveal a surprisingly balanced game.
Philadelphia generated 294 total yards.
Green Bay generated 261.
The Eagles ran 60 offensive plays, while the Packers ran 66.
Philadelphia averaged 4.9 yards per offensive play.
Green Bay averaged 4.0.
This is an important statistic.
Although Green Bay ran more plays, Philadelphia gained more yards.
That means the Eagles were more efficient on a per-play basis.
Philadelphia also produced 111 rushing yards and 183 net passing yards.
Green Bay recorded 104 rushing yards and 157 net passing yards.
The Eagles therefore had advantages in both major yardage categories.
What the Player Stats Reveal
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats reveal a game that was decided by several small advantages rather than one overwhelming performance.
Philadelphia did not have a 300-yard passer.
The Eagles did not have a 100-yard rusher.
They did not dominate the red zone.
Instead, they won through efficiency, defensive pressure, turnover control and timely explosive plays.
DeVonta Smith provided the key receiving touchdown.
Saquon Barkley contributed 101 combined rushing and receiving yards.
Hurts avoided sacks and threw one touchdown.
The defense created three sacks and recovered two Green Bay fumbles.
Those contributions combined to produce the win.
Why Jordan Love’s Numbers Were Not Enough
Love’s 20 completions were actually seven more than Hurts’ 15.
However, completions alone do not determine offensive success.
Love attempted 36 passes and produced 176 gross yards. His average was only 4.9 yards per attempt.
Hurts attempted 26 passes and produced 183 yards, averaging 7.0 yards per attempt.
That is a significant efficiency difference.
Philadelphia gained 7.0 yards every time Hurts attempted a pass.
Green Bay gained 4.9.
The Packers also allowed three sacks.
Those sacks reduced their net passing production and placed additional pressure on the offense.
The result was a passing attack that moved the ball at times but struggled to create scoring opportunities.
Why Jalen Hurts Did Enough
Hurts’ performance should be evaluated in the context of the game.
A quarterback does not need to throw for 300 yards when his defense is holding the opponent to seven points.
Hurts completed 15 of 26 passes for 183 yards and one touchdown.
- He did not throw an interception.
- He was not sacked.
- He also rushed five times for 27 yards.
His performance was efficient enough to support a defensive game plan.
Philadelphia did not need Hurts to carry the offense. It needed him to protect the football and capitalize when opportunities appeared.
He did exactly that.
The Biggest Statistical Difference
The biggest difference was not one individual player’s yardage.
It was the combination of efficiency and turnovers.
Philadelphia:
- 294 total yards
- 7.0 passing yards per attempt
- 111 rushing yards
- 3 sacks
- 8 quarterback hits
- 1 turnover lost
- 43.8% third-down conversion
Green Bay:
- 261 total yards
- 4.9 passing yards per attempt
- 104 rushing yards
- 0 sacks
- 0 quarterback hits
- 2 turnovers lost
- 38.5% third-down conversion
That profile explains the final score better than simply looking at passing or rushing totals.
A Closer Look at the 10-7 Result
The final score can sometimes hide the quality of a football game.
This was not a case where both offenses simply failed to move the ball.
Philadelphia produced 294 yards.
Green Bay produced 261.
The Eagles gained more yards despite running fewer plays.
The Packers earned 18 first downs compared with Philadelphia’s 13, showing that they could sustain drives at times.
However, Philadelphia produced better efficiency and avoided the same level of mistakes.
The game was therefore a strong example of how field position, turnovers, pressure and efficiency can outweigh raw first-down totals.
Historical Context of the Game
The victory moved Philadelphia to 7-2 and Green Bay to 5-3-1.
NFL’s official schedule confirms that Philadelphia entered Week 10 with a 6-2 record after its bye and left the game at 7-2. Green Bay entered the contest at 5-2-1 and moved to 5-3-1 after the loss.
The victory also became one of Philadelphia’s lowest-scoring wins of the season.
The NFL noted that the Eagles’ 10 points were their fewest in a victory since Week 15 of the 2007 season.
That fact puts the game into better perspective.
Philadelphia was not trying to win a shootout.
The team won through defense and situational football.
Player-by-Player Summary
Philadelphia Eagles
Jalen Hurts: 15 completions on 26 attempts, 183 yards, one touchdown, no interceptions, 92.3 passer rating. He also rushed five times for 27 yards.
Saquon Barkley: 22 carries for 60 yards, plus three receptions for 41 yards. He finished with 101 combined yards.
DeVonta Smith: Four receptions for 69 yards and one touchdown.
Dallas Goedert: Four receptions for 43 yards.
A.J. Brown: Two receptions for 13 yards.
Will Shipley: Four rushing attempts for 17 yards and two receptions for 17 yards.
Zack Baun: Eight tackles.
Nakobe Dean: Seven tackles and one sack.
Reed Blankenship: Seven tackles.
Jaelan Phillips: Six tackles and one tackle for loss.
Jalyx Hunt: Five tackles, one sack and two tackles for loss.
Green Bay Packers
Jordan Love: 20 completions on 36 attempts, 176 gross yards, no touchdowns, no interceptions, three sacks and a 68.8 passer rating.
Josh Jacobs: 21 carries for 74 yards and one touchdown, plus five receptions for 33 yards.
Christian Watson: Two receptions for 45 yards.
Dontayvion Wicks: Four receptions for 38 yards.
Bo Melton: Two receptions for 28 yards.
Luke Musgrave: Three receptions for 23 yards.
Xavier McKinney: Seven tackles.
Evan Williams: Seven tackles.
Quay Walker: Six tackles.
Isaiah McDuffie: Six tackles.
Edgerrin Cooper: Six tackles.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Eagles vs Packers game in 2025?
The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Green Bay Packers 10-7 on November 10, 2025, at Lambeau Field.
How many passing yards did Jalen Hurts have?
Jalen Hurts completed 15 of 26 passes for 183 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions. His passer rating was 92.3.
How many passing yards did Jordan Love have?
Jordan Love completed 20 of 36 passes for 176 gross yards. He threw no touchdowns or interceptions and was sacked three times for 19 yards.
Who was the leading Eagles receiver?
DeVonta Smith led Philadelphia with four receptions for 69 yards and one touchdown. His longest catch was 36 yards.
Who was the leading Packers rusher?
Josh Jacobs led Green Bay with 21 carries for 74 yards and one rushing touchdown. He also caught five passes for 33 yards.
How many turnovers did each team have?
Philadelphia lost one fumble, while Green Bay lost two fumbles. Neither team threw an interception.
Conclusion
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats show that Philadelphia won because it executed better in the areas that mattered most.
The Eagles finished with 294 total yards compared with Green Bay’s 261. They averaged 7.0 yards per pass attempt compared with 4.9 for the Packers. Philadelphia also converted more third downs, allowed no sacks and forced Green Bay into two lost fumbles.
Jalen Hurts delivered a controlled performance with 183 passing yards and one touchdown. DeVonta Smith provided the biggest receiving impact with 69 yards and a touchdown. Saquon Barkley contributed 101 combined yards despite averaging only 2.7 yards per rushing attempt.
For Green Bay, Josh Jacobs was productive on the ground and through the air, while Christian Watson provided the team’s best explosive receiving numbers. Jordan Love completed 20 passes but struggled to turn those completions into meaningful scoring production.
Ultimately, the game was decided by efficiency, defensive pressure and turnovers. Philadelphia did not need an explosive offensive performance because its defense consistently prevented Green Bay from building enough momentum.
The 10-7 final score was therefore a direct reflection of the game’s identity. Philadelphia played a controlled, defense-led game, while Green Bay moved the ball at times but failed to convert enough opportunities into points.
For readers checking individual numbers, the official NFL game statistics provide the authoritative box score and game record.
