Philadelphia Eagles vs Chargers Match Player Stats

The philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats from December 9, 2025, tell the story of a game that was far more competitive than the final score alone suggests. The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 22-19 in overtime, but the numbers reveal a contest shaped by turnovers, rushing efficiency, defensive pressure, missed opportunities, and a highly productive performance from several individual players.

Philadelphia entered the matchup with an 8-5 record, including a 4-3 mark away from home. Los Angeles came into the game at 9-4 and had been particularly strong at home with a 6-2 record. Those records help explain why the matchup carried significant weight, but the player statistics provide a much clearer picture of how the game actually unfolded.

The Eagles produced 134 rushing yards on 25 attempts, while the Chargers finished with 169 rushing yards on 38 attempts. Philadelphia’s passing offense produced 240 yards, but Jalen Hurts threw four interceptions. Justin Herbert, meanwhile, passed for only 139 yards and one touchdown while also throwing an interception.

The most striking contrast was therefore not simply passing versus rushing. It was efficiency versus mistakes. Saquon Barkley delivered a powerful performance for Philadelphia, A.J. Brown surpassed 100 receiving yards, and the Eagles generated seven sacks. Yet Los Angeles remained in position to win because it controlled the ground game, limited Philadelphia’s passing efficiency, and received a perfect field goal performance from Cameron Dicker.

Philadelphia Eagles vs Chargers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The Chargers won 22-19 in overtime, making this a game where individual statistics need to be viewed in context.

Category	Philadelphia Eagles	Los Angeles Chargers
Final Score	19	22
Record	8-5	9-4
Home/Away Record	4-3 Away	6-2 Home
Passing Yards	240	139
Rushing Yards	134	169
Total Offensive Yards	374	308
Passing TDs	0	1
Rushing TDs	1	0
Interceptions Thrown	4	1
Team Sacks	7	1
Field Goals	4/5	5/5
Extra Points	1/1	1/1

At first glance, Philadelphia appears to have had the more productive offense. The Eagles gained 374 total yards compared with 308 for Los Angeles. They also recorded significantly more defensive pressure, collecting seven sacks against Herbert.

However, the Chargers converted their opportunities more effectively.

That distinction is crucial.

Philadelphia moved the football through Barkley’s running and Brown’s receiving production, but four interceptions dramatically changed the value of those offensive possessions. Los Angeles generated fewer total yards but protected the football better and received 16 points from Dicker’s kicking performance.

This is why raw yardage should never be used as the only measure of which team played better.

Jalen Hurts Passing Performance

Jalen Hurts finished 21 of 40 passing for 240 yards. He averaged 6.0 yards per attempt and did not throw a touchdown. His final statistical line also included four interceptions, nine sacks for 33 yards lost, a 25.1 QBR and a 31.2 passer rating.

Those numbers make Hurts one of the central figures in understanding the outcome.

The 240 passing yards were respectable in isolation. The problem was the number of possessions that ended without Philadelphia converting its offensive opportunities into points.

Four interceptions are especially damaging in a close game.

The Eagles were not completely shut down through the air. They completed 21 passes and generated 240 passing yards. A.J. Brown alone accounted for 100 receiving yards. But the turnovers prevented the passing production from translating into consistent scoring.

Hurts also absorbed nine sacks. That indicates how much pressure Philadelphia faced despite maintaining enough offensive production to finish with 374 total yards.

The combination of four interceptions and nine sacks is particularly important because both statistics represent lost offensive opportunities. Sacks can push an offense out of scoring range, while interceptions can give the opponent possession immediately.

For an offense operating in a three-point game, those mistakes become decisive.

Saquon Barkley Leads Philadelphia’s Ground Attack

Saquon Barkley was one of Philadelphia’s strongest individual performers.

He carried the ball 20 times for 122 yards, averaging 6.1 yards per carry. His longest run covered 52 yards, and he scored Philadelphia’s only rushing touchdown.

His contribution becomes even more impressive when compared with the team’s overall rushing production.

Philadelphia finished with 25 rushing attempts for 134 yards, meaning Barkley accounted for most of the team’s rushing output. His 122 yards represented approximately 91 percent of the Eagles’ rushing yardage.

That level of production demonstrates how heavily Philadelphia relied on Barkley to create explosive plays.

His 52-yard run was particularly significant because explosive rushing plays can completely change field position. Barkley also averaged more than six yards every time he carried the ball, which suggests that the Eagles had success attacking the Chargers on the ground even though they ultimately lost.

The challenge was consistency across the entire offensive operation.

Barkley provided efficiency. Brown provided receiving production. The Eagles accumulated 374 total yards. Yet turnovers prevented those positive elements from producing enough points.

This is an important lesson when interpreting player statistics. A player can perform at an excellent individual level without his team necessarily winning.

A.J. Brown’s 100-Yard Receiving Game

A.J. Brown led Philadelphia’s receiving group with six receptions for 100 yards.

He averaged 16.7 yards per reception and recorded a long reception of 26 yards. Brown was targeted 13 times, which means he received more than one-third of Philadelphia’s 38 total targets.

That target share demonstrates how important Brown was to the passing strategy.

His 100 yards also accounted for a substantial portion of Hurts’ 240 passing yards. Brown was clearly one of the primary sources of explosive passing production for Philadelphia.

The 16.7-yard average is another important detail.

Brown was not simply collecting short completions. His average indicates that Philadelphia was using him to create meaningful gains down the field. His 26-yard longest reception reinforces that role.

However, the offense struggled to turn those successful plays into a winning scoring total.

This is where the philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats become more useful than a simple box score summary. Brown’s production was strong, Barkley’s production was strong, and the Eagles’ defense generated significant pressure. Still, the final result went against Philadelphia.

The difference was execution at critical moments.

Philadelphia’s Other Key Offensive Players

The Eagles’ offensive group also included Dallas Goedert and DeVonta Smith among the key players identified for the matchup.

While Brown emerged as the leading receiver with 100 yards, Philadelphia’s overall passing numbers show that production was distributed across the offense. The team completed 21 passes from 38 total targets.

The bigger issue was not an absence of offensive talent.

Instead, the major statistical problem was that the Eagles could not protect possessions consistently enough.

Four interceptions represent the clearest indicator. When an offense generates 240 passing yards but throws four interceptions, the yardage total does not fully represent its effectiveness.

This is particularly important in games decided by three points or fewer.

A 20-yard gain and an interception do not carry equal value. One creates opportunity while the other ends a possession and gives the opponent the ball.

That is why turnover statistics are essential when evaluating this matchup.

Justin Herbert’s Passing Numbers

Justin Herbert completed 12 of 26 passes for 139 yards, averaging 5.3 yards per attempt.

He threw one touchdown and one interception. Herbert was also sacked once for a loss of 33 yards. His QBR was 32.5, while his passer rating was 59.6.

On pure passing volume, Herbert’s performance was modest.

He attempted 26 passes compared with Hurts’ 40. He also produced 101 fewer passing yards.

Yet Herbert’s lower passing volume should be considered alongside the Chargers’ rushing performance.

Los Angeles ran the football 38 times for 169 yards. That allowed the Chargers to establish an offensive balance that reduced their dependence on Herbert throwing the ball repeatedly.

Herbert also contributed as a runner.

He carried the ball 10 times for 66 yards, averaging 6.6 yards per carry. His longest run was 15 yards.

Those numbers are particularly relevant because the Chargers’ passing game was not statistically dominant. Herbert’s rushing contribution helped compensate for the limited passing output.

His combined rushing and passing production therefore tells a more complete story than his passing line alone.

Kimani Vidal Provides an Explosive Receiving Play

Kimani Vidal produced one of the most eye-catching individual plays in the Chargers’ receiving statistics.

He recorded one reception for 60 yards on three targets.

That single reception represented a huge chunk of Los Angeles’ passing production. Vidal’s 60-yard catch was also the longest reception listed for the Chargers.

This is a perfect example of why average statistics can sometimes hide the importance of an individual play.

One reception is not a large workload. But a 60-yard reception can dramatically alter field position and scoring opportunity.

Vidal’s production was therefore low in volume but high in impact.

For analysts reviewing the game, his contribution should be considered alongside the Chargers’ strong rushing numbers. Los Angeles did not need Herbert to throw for 300 yards because the offense found other ways to create yardage.

Chargers Receiving Production

The Chargers finished with 12 receptions for 139 yards, averaging 11.6 yards per reception.

The group included players such as Keenan Allen, Ladd McConkey and Omarion Hampton, while Vidal produced the longest individual reception.

Compared with Philadelphia’s 21 receptions for 240 yards, Los Angeles had considerably less passing production.

That makes the final victory more interesting.

The Chargers won despite being outgained overall.

Philadelphia generated 374 total yards compared with 308 for Los Angeles. Yet Los Angeles produced enough scoring opportunities to reach 22 points and eventually win in overtime.

The Chargers’ receiving production therefore needs to be evaluated in terms of efficiency and situational value rather than volume.

The Rushing Battle Favored Los Angeles

The rushing statistics provide one of the clearest explanations for the Chargers’ victory.

Los Angeles recorded 38 rushing attempts for 169 yards.

Philadelphia recorded 25 rushing attempts for 134 yards.

The Chargers averaged 4.4 yards per carry as a team, while Philadelphia averaged 5.4.

That means Philadelphia was more efficient on a per-carry basis, but Los Angeles committed to the run much more heavily.

The 13-attempt difference is significant.

A team can use the running game to control possession, manage the pace and reduce pressure on its quarterback. Los Angeles’ 38 attempts indicate a strong commitment to the ground game.

Herbert’s 66 rushing yards were particularly valuable.

His 10 carries were a major part of the Chargers’ rushing total, showing that the quarterback contributed directly to the ground attack.

The Eagles, meanwhile, received a huge performance from Barkley but had fewer total rushing attempts.

This creates an interesting contrast.

Philadelphia had the more efficient rushing attack, while Los Angeles had the greater rushing volume.

Philadelphia’s Defensive Pressure Was Excellent

Philadelphia’s defense recorded seven sacks and 11 quarterback hits.

The Eagles also accumulated 85 total tackles, including 49 solo tackles and seven tackles for loss.

Those numbers indicate that the defense consistently affected the Chargers’ offensive operation.

Herbert was pressured heavily throughout the game, although he was officially credited with only one sack. The seven Eagles sacks were a major statistical advantage.

Philadelphia also recorded five passes defended.

Adoree’ Jackson registered an interception for the Eagles, returning it one yard.

Despite the defensive success, Philadelphia could not convert that pressure into enough overall control of the game.

This is another important distinction between individual defensive production and team results.

A defense can generate sacks and takeaways while still losing if the offense gives away too many possessions.

That appears to be one of the defining features of this matchup.

Chargers Defense Creates Turnover Opportunities

Los Angeles recorded four interceptions.

Cam Hart returned one interception for 27 yards. Da’Shawn Hand recorded another with a seven-yard return. Donte Jackson added an interception with a six-yard return, while Tony Jefferson recorded another with a three-yard return.

The Chargers therefore matched Philadelphia’s four interceptions thrown by collecting four takeaways through the air.

This is one of the strongest statistical reasons the game remained within Los Angeles’ control.

Philadelphia’s defense generated seven sacks, but the Chargers’ secondary generated four interceptions.

The two teams therefore created different forms of defensive disruption.

Philadelphia attacked the quarterback through pressure.

Los Angeles attacked the passing game through takeaways.

In a close contest, interceptions can be especially valuable because they immediately change possession.

Turnovers Were Central to the Result

Turnovers may be the single most important statistic for understanding the game.

Philadelphia recorded two team fumbles, with one lost. Los Angeles recorded three fumbles, with two lost.

The Eagles also threw four interceptions.

The Chargers threw one interception.

This means Philadelphia’s offense committed substantially more turnover damage through the passing game.

Even though Los Angeles also lost two fumbles, the Chargers ultimately avoided the extreme interception problem that affected Philadelphia.

This is why the final score should not be interpreted simply through total yardage.

Philadelphia gained 66 more total yards than Los Angeles but still lost.

That is a classic example of how turnovers can outweigh yardage advantages.

Field Goal Kicking Made a Major Difference

Kicking was another decisive part of the matchup.

Jake Elliott converted four of five field-goal attempts for Philadelphia. He made his extra-point attempt and finished with 13 points.

Cameron Dicker was perfect for Los Angeles.

He made all five field-goal attempts and his extra point, finishing with 16 points.

Dicker’s five successful field goals were worth more points than Philadelphia’s kicker produced across all of Elliott’s successful kicks and extra point.

The longest successful field goal for each team was 54 yards.

In a 22-19 overtime game, three additional points from perfect kicking efficiency become extremely important.

Dicker’s 5-for-5 performance meant Los Angeles converted every listed field-goal opportunity.

Elliott’s 4-for-5 performance was still strong, but the missed attempt represented a lost scoring opportunity.

Punting and Field Position

Braden Mann punted three times for Philadelphia for 155 yards, averaging 51.7 yards per punt. His longest punt traveled 60 yards, and he recorded one touchback.

JK Scott punted five times for Los Angeles for 256 yards, averaging 51.2 yards per punt. His longest punt traveled 57 yards, and he placed one punt inside the 20-yard line.

The punting statistics were relatively close in average distance.

Mann had the slightly higher average at 51.7 yards, while Scott had greater total punting yardage because he punted more often.

Scott’s one punt inside the 20 was also useful from a field-position perspective.

Special teams did not dominate the statistical profile of the game, but in a close matchup, field position can influence how difficult an offense’s next possession becomes.

Return Game Comparison

Philadelphia recorded six kick returns for 159 yards, averaging 26.5 yards per return. The longest return was 30 yards.

The Chargers recorded seven kick returns for 167 yards, averaging 23.9 yards per return. Their longest kick return covered 28 yards.

Philadelphia therefore had the higher kick-return average despite having fewer total return yards.

The Eagles also recorded three punt returns for 54 yards, averaging 18.0 yards per return.

Los Angeles had one punt return listed for negative 10 yards, with Derius Davis recording minus 10 yards.

This gave Philadelphia a clear statistical advantage in punt-return production.

Again, however, that advantage did not translate directly into victory.

Philadelphia Eagles vs Chargers Match Player Stats: What the Numbers Really Mean

The most useful way to interpret the philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats is to separate volume from impact.

Philadelphia led in several volume categories.

The Eagles had:

• 374 total offensive yards
• 240 passing yards
• 134 rushing yards
• 21 completed passes
• 100 receiving yards from Brown
• 122 rushing yards from Barkley
• Seven sacks on defense
• Five passes defended
• Three punt returns for 54 yards

Los Angeles, however, produced the statistics that were more closely connected to the final result.

The Chargers had:

• 169 rushing yards
• 38 rushing attempts
• One passing touchdown
• Four interceptions generated
• Five successful field goals
• 16 points from Dicker
• Only one interception thrown by Herbert

The contrast shows why box-score analysis requires context.

Philadelphia moved the ball.

Los Angeles protected its scoring opportunities better.

That difference ultimately decided the game.

Why Saquon Barkley’s Performance Was Important

Barkley’s 122 rushing yards were not enough to secure victory, but they were one of the strongest individual performances of the game.

His 6.1-yard average was higher than the Chargers’ team rushing average.

His 52-yard long run was also one of the biggest explosive plays in the matchup.

The problem for Philadelphia was that Barkley’s efficiency was not fully matched by possession security.

An offense can gain six yards per carry and still struggle if it repeatedly gives the football away through interceptions.

This is one reason player evaluation should not be reduced to whether the team won.

Barkley performed well statistically.

Brown performed well statistically.

The Eagles’ defense produced seven sacks.

Yet the combined team result remained negative because other variables carried greater weight.

Why A.J. Brown’s Production Matters

Brown’s six receptions for 100 yards on 13 targets made him the Eagles’ most productive receiver.

His 16.7 yards per catch showed that Philadelphia was generating meaningful gains when connecting with him.

The 13 targets also indicate a strong emphasis on getting the ball to one of the team’s primary offensive weapons.

For future statistical analysis, Brown’s performance is a useful example of why targets matter alongside receptions.

Six catches can look modest without context.

Thirteen targets reveal that the quarterback consistently looked toward him.

That makes the 100-yard performance even more notable.

Why Justin Herbert’s Rushing Numbers Should Not Be Ignored

Herbert’s passing numbers were not impressive compared with the volume normally associated with high-level quarterback performances.

However, his 66 rushing yards on 10 carries changed the interpretation.

He averaged 6.6 yards per carry, which was better than both teams’ rushing averages.

The Chargers effectively received another rushing weapon from their quarterback.

This helped Los Angeles produce 169 rushing yards despite Herbert passing for only 139.

The game therefore illustrates how quarterback value can come from multiple statistical categories.

A quarterback does not need to throw for a large number of yards if the offensive system can generate production through rushing and situational passing.

A Statistical Explanation for the Overtime Finish

The game finished 22-19 in overtime.

That narrow margin makes every major statistical advantage worth examining.

Philadelphia had more total yards.

The Eagles had more passing yards.

They had more efficient rushing.

They had seven sacks compared with one for Los Angeles.

They also had stronger punt-return production.

Yet Philadelphia lost.

The major counterweights were turnovers and scoring efficiency.

Hurts threw four interceptions.

The Chargers threw one.

Dicker made all five field goals.

Elliott made four of five.

Los Angeles also ran the ball 38 times compared with Philadelphia’s 25 attempts.

When those factors are considered together, the final result becomes much easier to understand.

What This Game Says About Offensive Efficiency

One of the biggest lessons from this matchup is that offensive efficiency is more complicated than total yardage.

Philadelphia produced 374 yards, but the Eagles scored only 19 points.

Los Angeles produced 308 yards but scored 22.

That means Los Angeles generated more points per yard.

The difference was not necessarily because the Chargers consistently moved the ball better.

Instead, they avoided the type of turnover damage that Philadelphia experienced and converted field-goal opportunities at a perfect rate.

For analysts, this is an important distinction.

A high-yardage offense can still lose if it struggles with turnovers.

A lower-yardage offense can win if it protects possessions and consistently converts scoring chances.

What the Defensive Statistics Tell Us

The defensive statistics create another interesting contrast.

Philadelphia recorded:

• 85 total tackles
• 49 solo tackles
• Seven sacks
• Seven tackles for loss
• Five passes defended
• 11 quarterback hits
• One interception

Los Angeles recorded:

• 65 total tackles
• 47 solo tackles
• One sack
• Seven tackles for loss
• 10 passes defended
• Six quarterback hits
• Four interceptions

Philadelphia was clearly more aggressive in quarterback pressure.

Los Angeles was more successful at generating interceptions.

Those are different defensive strategies reflected directly in the statistics.

The Eagles’ seven sacks demonstrate the ability to disrupt the quarterback before a pass could develop.

The Chargers’ four interceptions demonstrate the ability to punish passing mistakes.

Both approaches produced impact plays, but Los Angeles’ turnovers had a particularly strong effect on the final result.

Philadelphia Eagles vs Chargers Match Player Stats for Future Analysis

For readers using this box score to compare players, the best approach is to group statistics by role.

Quarterbacks

Jalen Hurts:

• 21 completions on 40 attempts
• 240 yards
• 0 touchdowns
• 4 interceptions
• 9 sacks
• 25.1 QBR
• 31.2 passer rating

Justin Herbert:

• 12 completions on 26 attempts
• 139 yards
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• 1 sack
• 32.5 QBR
• 59.6 passer rating
• 66 rushing yards

Running Backs and Rushing Contributors

Saquon Barkley:

• 20 carries
• 122 yards
• 6.1 yards per carry
• 1 touchdown
• 52-yard long

Justin Herbert:

• 10 carries
• 66 yards
• 6.6 yards per carry
• 15-yard long

Philadelphia as a team:

• 25 carries
• 134 yards
• 5.4 yards per carry
• 1 touchdown

Los Angeles as a team:

• 38 carries
• 169 yards
• 4.4 yards per carry
• 0 touchdowns

Leading Receivers

A.J. Brown:

• 6 receptions
• 100 yards
• 16.7 yards per reception
• 13 targets
• 26-yard long

Kimani Vidal:

• 1 reception
• 60 yards
• 60.0 yards per reception
• 3 targets
• 60-yard long

These figures show two very different types of receiving impact.

Brown delivered sustained production across multiple catches.

Vidal produced one enormous gain.

Both were valuable, but their contributions came in different forms.

The Biggest Statistical Takeaways

Several conclusions stand out from the complete box score.

1. Philadelphia won the yardage battle but lost the turnover battle

The Eagles gained 374 yards compared with 308 for Los Angeles.

That advantage did not translate into a win because Hurts threw four interceptions.

2. Barkley was one of the game’s strongest individual performers

His 122 rushing yards and 52-yard run gave Philadelphia a major source of explosive offense.

3. Brown was Philadelphia’s leading receiver

His 100 receiving yards on six catches made him the team’s most productive pass catcher.

4. The Chargers leaned heavily on the ground game

Los Angeles ran 38 times for 169 yards.

That reduced the burden on Herbert’s passing arm.

5. Herbert contributed significantly as a runner

His 66 rushing yards on 10 carries were a major component of the Chargers’ offense.

6. Philadelphia’s pass rush was highly productive

Seven sacks and 11 quarterback hits demonstrate how aggressively the Eagles attacked the Chargers’ passing game.

7. Los Angeles created four interceptions

Cam Hart, Da’Shawn Hand, Donte Jackson and Tony Jefferson each recorded an interception.

8. Cameron Dicker was perfect on field goals

His five successful field goals accounted for 15 points, while his extra point brought his total to 16.

9. The game was decided by small margins

A three-point final margin means missed opportunities, turnovers and field-goal efficiency carried enormous importance.

How to Read NFL Player Stats More Effectively

A useful way to analyze a close NFL game is to avoid judging the outcome from one category.

Instead, consider five layers.

First, examine total production.

Look at passing yards, rushing yards and total offensive output.

Second, examine efficiency.

Yards per attempt, yards per carry and yards per reception can reveal how efficiently those opportunities were used.

Third, examine turnovers.

Interceptions and lost fumbles can completely change the meaning of offensive yardage.

Fourth, examine scoring conversion.

Field goals, touchdowns and extra points show whether production became points.

Fifth, examine defensive impact.

Sacks, quarterback hits, tackles for loss, interceptions and passes defended help explain why an offense struggled.

Using all five layers provides a much more reliable understanding than simply checking which team had more yards.

Final Assessment of the Match

The Philadelphia Eagles versus Los Angeles Chargers matchup was a strong example of how NFL games can be decided by efficiency rather than raw statistical volume.

Philadelphia produced more total yards and received excellent individual performances from Barkley and Brown. The Eagles’ defense also generated seven sacks, which was a major advantage.

But four interceptions from Hurts created a significant obstacle.

Los Angeles did not dominate through the air. Herbert finished with 139 passing yards and one touchdown. Instead, the Chargers relied on a balanced rushing attack, Herbert’s mobility, explosive plays such as Vidal’s 60-yard reception, and exceptional kicking from Dicker.

The Chargers also produced four interceptions of their own.

That combination helped them survive Philadelphia’s yardage advantage.

The final 22-19 overtime score reflects just how narrow the difference was. Neither team produced a completely dominant statistical profile. Philadelphia had several categories in its favor, while Los Angeles excelled in the categories that most directly affected scoring opportunities and possession value.

For anyone studying philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats, the most important lesson is simple: the box score needs to be read as a complete story.

Barkley’s rushing efficiency, Brown’s receiving production and Philadelphia’s seven sacks were all meaningful. So were Hurts’ four interceptions, Los Angeles’ 38 rushing attempts, Herbert’s 66 rushing yards and Dicker’s perfect 5-for-5 field-goal performance.

The Chargers ultimately won because those factors combined to produce three more points when the game was decided.

FAQs

Who won the Philadelphia Eagles vs Los Angeles Chargers game?

The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 22-19 in overtime on December 9, 2025.

How many yards did Saquon Barkley rush for?

Saquon Barkley rushed for 122 yards on 20 carries. He averaged 6.1 yards per carry and scored one touchdown.

How did Jalen Hurts perform against the Chargers?

Jalen Hurts completed 21 of 40 passes for 240 yards. He threw no touchdowns and four interceptions. He was also sacked nine times.

Who was Philadelphia’s leading receiver?

A.J. Brown led Philadelphia with six receptions for 100 yards. He was targeted 13 times and averaged 16.7 yards per reception.

How many interceptions did the Chargers record?

Los Angeles recorded four interceptions. Cam Hart, Da’Shawn Hand, Donte Jackson and Tony Jefferson each recorded one.

Who scored the most points through kicking?

Los Angeles kicker Cameron Dicker scored 16 points. He made all five of his field-goal attempts and his extra point.

Conclusion

The December 9, 2025 matchup between Philadelphia and Los Angeles was decided by a combination of turnovers, rushing volume, defensive disruption and kicking accuracy.

Philadelphia generated more total offense and had several standout individual performances. Saquon Barkley rushed for 122 yards, A.J. Brown reached 100 receiving yards, and the Eagles recorded seven sacks.

Los Angeles responded with 169 rushing yards, four interceptions, a 60-yard reception from Kimani Vidal and a perfect five-field-goal performance from Cameron Dicker.

The final 22-19 overtime result therefore cannot be explained by yardage alone. Philadelphia moved the football effectively, but its four interceptions created a major disadvantage. The Chargers produced fewer total yards but protected their possessions more effectively and converted their scoring opportunities.

For readers examining the philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats, the clearest takeaway is that individual excellence and team victory are not always the same thing. Barkley and Brown delivered strong performances, while Philadelphia’s defense created substantial pressure. Los Angeles ultimately won because its combination of ball security, rushing volume, defensive takeaways and kicking efficiency produced the extra points needed in a tightly contested game.

The statistics provide a detailed record of what happened, but the deeper story is about value. Yardage matters, explosive plays matter, defensive pressure matters and kicking matters. In a game decided by only three points, however, turnovers and scoring efficiency can outweigh almost everything else.