Minnesota Vikings vs Chargers Match Player Stats
The Minnesota Vikings vs Chargers match player stats from October 24, 2025 tell a clear story about how the Los Angeles Chargers controlled this matchup from the ground up. Los Angeles defeated Minnesota 37-10, combining Justin Herbert’s efficient passing, Kimani Vidal’s powerful rushing performance, and a defense that produced five sacks and eight quarterback hits. Minnesota, meanwhile, struggled to sustain offensive drives, finishing with only 34 rushing yards and 130 team passing yards.
For readers looking beyond the final score, the individual numbers explain much more. The Chargers did not rely on one statistical category alone. They created separation through explosive rushing, efficient passing, red-zone production, and consistent pressure on the quarterback. Minnesota found some production through Justin Jefferson and Jordan Addison, but the Vikings’ overall offensive output was not enough to keep pace.
The game also provides an interesting example of why player statistics should be studied together rather than viewed as isolated numbers. Herbert’s 227 passing yards were important, but his three touchdown passes and 122.8 passer rating made the performance considerably more impactful. Vidal’s 117 rushing yards mattered because they helped the Chargers maintain balance and control the game.
Minnesota Vikings vs Chargers Match Player Stats at a Glance
Here is the most important statistical information from the game.
| Category | Minnesota Vikings | Los Angeles Chargers |
| Final Score | 10 | 37 |
| Team Passing | 130 yards | 227 yards |
| Team Rushing | 34 yards | 207 yards |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks Allowed | 5 | 2 |
| Defensive Sacks | 2 | 5 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Team Receptions | 18 | 18 |
| Receiving Yards | 157 | 227 |
| Field Goals | 1/2 | 3/4 |
| Extra Points | 1/1 | 4/4 |
The biggest difference appears in total offensive balance.
Minnesota produced 164 combined passing and rushing yards based on the supplied team figures. Los Angeles generated 434. That is a difference of 270 yards, which helps explain why the Chargers were able to build such a large advantage.
The Chargers also averaged 4.8 yards per rushing attempt compared with Minnesota’s 3.1 yards per attempt. That gap gave Los Angeles a much stronger foundation for its passing game.
Justin Herbert’s Passing Performance
Justin Herbert was the most productive passer in the matchup.
He completed 18 of 25 passes for 227 yards, averaging 9.1 yards per attempt. He threw three touchdowns and one interception. His reported QBR was 97.7, while his passer rating was 122.8.
Those numbers show an efficient passing performance rather than simply a high-volume one.
Herbert attempted only 25 passes, yet he generated 227 yards. That means the Chargers were able to create substantial offensive production without asking their quarterback to throw the ball 35 or 40 times.
His three touchdown passes were particularly important.
The Chargers received touchdown catches from Ladd McConkey, Oronde Gadsden, and Tre’ Harris. That distribution prevented Minnesota’s defense from focusing exclusively on one receiver.
Herbert also contributed as a runner.
He carried the ball seven times for 62 yards, averaging 8.9 yards per carry. His longest run was 18 yards. That rushing production added another dimension to the Chargers’ offense and made the defense account for Herbert outside the pocket.
Herbert’s Key Numbers
- 18 completions
- 25 attempts
- 227 passing yards
- 9.1 yards per attempt
- 3 passing touchdowns
- 1 interception
- 122.8 passer rating
- 97.7 QBR
- 7 rushing attempts
- 62 rushing yards
- 18-yard longest run
The combination of passing efficiency and rushing production made Herbert’s statistical contribution one of the defining factors in the game.
Carson Wentz and Minnesota’s Passing Game
Carson Wentz completed 15 of 27 passes for 144 yards. He averaged 5.3 yards per attempt and finished with one touchdown and one interception.
His reported passer rating was 67.5, with a QBR of 31.4.
The Vikings also used Max Brosmer, who completed 3 of 4 passes for 13 yards. He did not throw a touchdown or interception and finished with a reported 78.1 passer rating and 72.0 QBR.
Together, Minnesota’s quarterbacks completed 18 of 31 passes for 130 team passing yards according to the supplied team statistics.
The most important issue was not simply completion percentage. Minnesota struggled to generate enough yardage from its passing opportunities.
The Vikings averaged only 5.1 yards per team passing attempt, while the Chargers averaged 9.1 yards per attempt through Herbert.
That difference of four yards per attempt is substantial.
Minnesota also allowed five sacks for 27 yards. Those lost yards further reduced the effectiveness of the passing offense and made it difficult to maintain favorable down-and-distance situations.
Justin Jefferson Leads Minnesota’s Receiving Production
Justin Jefferson was Minnesota’s leading receiver by both receptions and receiving yards.
He caught seven passes for 74 yards on 11 targets. His average was 10.6 yards per reception, and his longest reception covered 17 yards.
Jefferson did not score a touchdown, but he accounted for a large share of Minnesota’s receiving production.
His 74 yards represented nearly half of the Vikings’ listed 157 receiving yards.
That makes his involvement important even without a touchdown. A receiver’s statistical value is not limited to scoring plays. Receptions that move the chains and create manageable down-and-distance situations can also shape an offense.
Jordan Addison’s Touchdown
Jordan Addison caught three passes for 26 yards on four targets.
His most important contribution came in the end zone, where he recorded Minnesota’s only receiving touchdown.
Addison averaged 8.7 yards per reception, with a longest catch of 15 yards.
The Vikings therefore had production from their top two wide receivers, but the offense did not consistently turn those individual contributions into sustained scoring drives.
T.J. Hockenson’s Contribution
T.J. Hockenson caught two passes for 26 yards.
Although he received only three targets, his 13.0 yards per reception was the highest average among Minnesota players with multiple receptions.
His longest reception went for 14 yards.
The limited target volume is notable because Minnesota needed more consistent offensive production to stay competitive against a Chargers offense that was operating efficiently.
Kimani Vidal’s Breakout Rushing Performance
Kimani Vidal was one of the central figures in the Chargers’ offensive success.
He carried the ball 23 times for 117 yards and one touchdown.
His 5.1 yards per carry average demonstrated consistent efficiency, while his longest run covered 21 yards.
Vidal’s workload was also important.
Twenty-three carries gave Los Angeles a reliable rushing option throughout the game. The Chargers did not need to rely exclusively on Herbert’s arm when they could consistently move the ball on the ground.
Vidal also caught one pass for 10 yards, giving him 127 total yards from scrimmage.
That combination of rushing volume and receiving contribution made him an important all-around offensive contributor.
Chargers Running Game
Los Angeles finished with 43 rushing attempts for 207 yards.
The team averaged 4.8 yards per carry and scored one rushing touchdown.
Herbert contributed 62 yards on seven carries, while Jaret Patterson added 30 yards on 11 carries.
Nyheim Hines had two carries for negative two yards.
The Chargers’ rushing attack therefore had contributions from several players, but Vidal clearly led the group in volume and production.
Minnesota’s Rushing Problems
Minnesota’s running game had a very different statistical profile.
The Vikings recorded only 11 rushing attempts for 34 yards, averaging 3.1 yards per carry.
Zavier Scott led the team in rushing yardage with 16 yards on two carries. Aaron Jones Sr. added 15 yards on five carries, while Jordan Mason recorded three yards on four carries.
No Minnesota player rushed for a touchdown.
The low rushing volume stands out.
Minnesota attempted only 11 team rushes, compared with 43 for Los Angeles. That 32-attempt difference shows how dramatically the offensive approaches diverged.
When a team struggles to run effectively and also faces significant quarterback pressure, the offense can become increasingly predictable. The Vikings had to rely heavily on their passing game, yet their passing attack was also dealing with five sacks.
That combination created a difficult environment for Minnesota’s offense.
Chargers Receiving Production
Los Angeles finished with 18 receptions for 227 yards and three receiving touchdowns.
Ladd McConkey led the Chargers with six receptions for 88 yards on 10 targets.
He averaged 14.7 yards per reception and recorded a 27-yard long reception.
McConkey’s combination of volume and efficiency made him a major component of Herbert’s passing attack.
Oronde Gadsden was another important contributor.
He caught five passes for 77 yards on five targets, meaning every listed target resulted in a reception. His 15.4 yards per reception was the highest average among the Chargers’ primary receivers.
His longest catch covered 40 yards, which was also the longest reception listed for either team.
Gadsden also scored a touchdown.
Keenan Allen added four receptions for 44 yards on five targets.
Tre’ Harris caught two passes for eight yards and scored a touchdown, while Kimani Vidal added one reception for 10 yards.
Chargers Receiving Distribution
The Chargers’ receiving statistics show a useful level of distribution:
- Ladd McConkey: 6 receptions, 88 yards, 1 TD
- Oronde Gadsden: 5 receptions, 77 yards, 1 TD
- Keenan Allen: 4 receptions, 44 yards
- Kimani Vidal: 1 reception, 10 yards
- Tre’ Harris: 2 receptions, 8 yards, 1 TD
Three different Chargers receivers scored touchdowns.
That distribution made it difficult for Minnesota to eliminate the passing game’s production by concentrating coverage on one player.
Defensive Statistics Tell Another Part of the Story
Offensive numbers explain much of the final score, but the defensive statistics reveal why Minnesota could not keep the game close.
The Chargers recorded five sacks, seven tackles for loss, eight quarterback hits, and seven passes defended.
Minnesota recorded two sacks, 10 tackles for loss, eight quarterback hits, and two passes defended.
The most obvious difference is pass-rush production.
Los Angeles generated five sacks against Minnesota’s quarterbacks, more than twice Minnesota’s total of two sacks against Herbert.
Five sacks can have a major effect on offensive efficiency because they remove yardage, disrupt timing, and frequently create longer down-and-distance situations.
Minnesota’s Defensive Effort
Minnesota recorded 80 total tackles, including 47 solo tackles.
The Vikings also recorded:
- 2 sacks
- 10 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 8 quarterback hits
- 1 interception
Joshua Metellus recorded Minnesota’s interception.
Despite the defensive workload, Minnesota allowed 37 points and 434 combined passing and rushing yards according to the supplied statistics.
That suggests the defense was frequently involved in plays but struggled to prevent sustained offensive production.
Chargers Defense Creates Pressure
Los Angeles finished with 46 total tackles and 33 solo tackles.
The Chargers also produced:
- 5 sacks
- 7 tackles for loss
- 7 passes defended
- 8 quarterback hits
- 1 interception
RJ Mickens recorded the Chargers’ interception and returned it 15 yards.
The five sacks are particularly important when evaluating the game from Minnesota’s perspective.
Wentz was already operating with modest passing efficiency, and the pressure reduced opportunities for the Vikings to develop longer offensive plays.
The Chargers also avoided turnovers through the fumble category, with no Los Angeles fumbles listed.
Turnovers and Hidden Statistical Factors
Both teams recorded one interception.
Minnesota’s Joshua Metellus intercepted Herbert, while RJ Mickens intercepted Wentz.
The Vikings also recorded one fumble by Wentz, but it was recovered by Minnesota.
Therefore, Minnesota did not lose that fumble.
This is an important distinction because the raw presence of a fumble does not automatically mean the opponent received possession.
The turnover totals alone therefore do not explain the 27-point margin.
The larger difference came from offensive efficiency, rushing production, touchdown generation, and pressure.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams also contributed to the statistical picture.
Will Reichard converted one of two field-goal attempts for Minnesota, with a long of 54 yards. He also converted his only extra-point attempt, finishing with four points.
Cameron Dicker made three of four field-goal attempts for Los Angeles, with a long of 45 yards. He converted all four extra-point attempts and finished with 13 points.
Minnesota’s Ryan Wright punted four times for 184 yards, averaging 46.0 yards per punt. Three of his punts finished inside the 20-yard line.
Los Angeles did not punt in the supplied statistics.
That last figure is particularly striking.
A team completing an entire game without a punt has been consistently productive enough to avoid giving the opponent repeated field-position opportunities through conventional punts. It also fits the broader offensive numbers showing that Los Angeles generated 434 yards and scored 37 points.
Kick and Punt Return Numbers
Myles Price handled Minnesota’s kick returns, recording five returns for 135 yards.
He averaged 27.0 yards per return and had a long return of 33 yards.
For Los Angeles, Derius Davis recorded three kick returns for 75 yards, averaging 25.0 yards per return.
Davis also recorded one punt return for no gain.
These numbers did not decide the game by themselves, but field position can influence the starting point of offensive drives and therefore affect play-calling and scoring opportunities.
What the Player Stats Say About the Game
The Minnesota Vikings vs Chargers match player stats show that the final score was supported by several interconnected advantages rather than one isolated performance.
1. Los Angeles controlled the rushing battle
The Chargers ran for 207 yards compared with Minnesota’s 34.
That is a 173-yard difference.
Vidal’s 117 yards were the foundation of the Chargers’ ground game, while Herbert added another 62 rushing yards.
Minnesota never found a comparable rushing presence.
2. Herbert was more efficient than Minnesota’s quarterbacks
Herbert completed 72 percent of his passes, going 18 for 25.
Wentz completed 55.6 percent of his attempts, going 15 for 27.
Herbert also averaged 9.1 yards per attempt compared with Wentz’s 5.3.
Those differences were reflected in the final passing production.
3. The Chargers protected their quarterback better
Los Angeles allowed two sacks for 15 yards.
Minnesota allowed five sacks for 27 yards.
The difference in protection allowed Herbert more opportunities to operate efficiently.
4. Los Angeles converted passing opportunities into touchdowns
The Chargers produced three passing touchdowns.
Minnesota produced one.
Herbert therefore generated significantly more scoring production from his passing opportunities.
5. Minnesota’s leading receiver still had a strong individual game
Jefferson’s seven catches for 74 yards should not be overlooked.
The Vikings’ offensive struggles were not caused by every individual player performing poorly. Several players produced useful numbers, but the team could not combine those contributions into enough points.
How to Read These Stats Correctly
One of the easiest mistakes when analyzing football statistics is to focus only on the player with the highest yardage total.
A better approach is to consider volume, efficiency, scoring, and context together.
For example, Jefferson led Minnesota in receptions and receiving yards. However, his seven catches for 74 yards did not produce a touchdown.
Vidal had 117 rushing yards, but his importance becomes clearer when his 23 carries and five yards per carry are considered together.
Herbert’s 227 passing yards are meaningful, but the three touchdown passes, 9.1 yards per attempt, and 122.8 passer rating provide additional context.
For readers tracking player performance, these relationships are often more useful than a simple leaderboard.
Official NFL statistics are another useful reference point when cross-checking football terminology and statistical categories. NFL Statistics
Key Statistical Takeaways for Minnesota
Minnesota’s most important statistical lessons from this game include:
- The rushing attack produced only 34 yards.
- The quarterbacks combined for 130 passing yards.
- The offense scored only one touchdown through the air.
- Wentz was sacked five times.
- Justin Jefferson remained the team’s leading receiver.
- Jordan Addison scored Minnesota’s only receiving touchdown.
- The defense recorded two sacks and one interception.
- The Vikings converted one of two field-goal attempts.
The numbers point toward an offense that had isolated successes but lacked sustained production.
Key Statistical Takeaways for Los Angeles
Los Angeles produced a much more balanced statistical profile:
- The Chargers rushed for 207 yards.
- Herbert passed for 227 yards.
- Herbert threw three touchdowns.
- Vidal rushed for 117 yards and one touchdown.
- Three different Chargers receivers caught touchdown passes.
- The defense recorded five sacks.
- RJ Mickens intercepted Wentz.
- Cameron Dicker scored 13 points.
- Los Angeles did not punt in the supplied game statistics.
The combination of these categories explains why the Chargers were able to reach 37 points.
Player-by-Player Statistical Snapshot
Minnesota Vikings
Carson Wentz: 15/27, 144 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 5 sacks, 67.5 passer rating.
Max Brosmer: 3/4, 13 passing yards, 0 TD, 0 INT, 78.1 passer rating.
Justin Jefferson: 7 receptions, 74 yards, 11 targets.
Jordan Addison: 3 receptions, 26 yards, 1 TD.
T.J. Hockenson: 2 receptions, 26 yards.
Aaron Jones Sr.: 5 rushing attempts, 15 yards, plus 2 receptions for 15 yards.
Jordan Mason: 4 rushing attempts for 3 yards, plus 1 reception for 3 yards.
Zavier Scott: 2 rushing attempts for 16 yards, plus 2 receptions for 8 yards.
Joshua Metellus: 1 interception.
Los Angeles Chargers
Justin Herbert: 18/25, 227 passing yards, 3 TDs, 1 INT, 62 rushing yards, 122.8 passer rating.
Kimani Vidal: 23 carries, 117 rushing yards, 1 TD, plus 10 receiving yards.
Ladd McConkey: 6 receptions, 88 yards, 1 TD.
Oronde Gadsden: 5 receptions, 77 yards, 1 TD.
Keenan Allen: 4 receptions, 44 yards.
Jaret Patterson: 11 carries, 30 yards.
Tre’ Harris: 2 receptions, 8 yards, 1 TD.
RJ Mickens: 1 interception and 15 return yards.
Cameron Dicker: 3/4 field goals and 4/4 extra points.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Vikings and Chargers?
The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Minnesota Vikings 37-10 on October 24, 2025.
Who was the leading passer?
Justin Herbert led all passers with 227 yards. He completed 18 of 25 attempts and threw three touchdown passes and one interception.
Who led the game in rushing?
Kimani Vidal led the game with 117 rushing yards on 23 carries. He also scored one rushing touchdown.
How did Justin Jefferson perform?
Justin Jefferson caught seven passes for 74 yards on 11 targets. He did not record a receiving touchdown.
How many sacks did the Chargers record?
The Los Angeles Chargers recorded five sacks against Minnesota’s quarterbacks.
Which team had more rushing yards?
The Chargers had a major advantage on the ground, rushing for 207 yards compared with 34 yards for Minnesota.
Conclusion
The Minnesota Vikings vs Chargers match player stats provide a detailed explanation for the 37-10 final score.
Los Angeles won the statistical battle in the areas that mattered most. The Chargers produced 207 rushing yards, 227 passing yards, four total touchdowns from their offense, and five sacks on defense. Justin Herbert combined efficient passing with valuable rushing production, while Kimani Vidal delivered 117 rushing yards and a touchdown.
The receiving corps also contributed across multiple players. Ladd McConkey led the Chargers with 88 receiving yards, Oronde Gadsden added 77 yards and a touchdown, and Keenan Allen produced 44 yards. Three different Chargers receivers scored touchdowns.
Minnesota had individual contributions from Justin Jefferson, Jordan Addison, T.J. Hockenson, and others, but the overall offensive numbers were much lower. The Vikings finished with only 34 rushing yards and 130 team passing yards while allowing five sacks.
The most revealing statistical contrast was the difference in offensive balance. Los Angeles ran the ball 43 times for 207 yards, while Minnesota had only 11 rushing attempts for 34 yards. That imbalance placed additional pressure on Minnesota’s passing game, which then faced a Chargers defense that generated consistent quarterback pressure.
Taken as a complete statistical profile, the game was defined by Los Angeles’ rushing efficiency, Herbert’s passing production, multi-player receiving contributions, and defensive pressure. Minnesota’s individual performances provide useful context, but the team-level numbers explain why the Chargers finished with a 27-point victory.
