Golden State Warriors vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The golden state warriors vs san antonio spurs match player stats from February 12, 2026, tell a much more detailed story than the 126-113 final score alone. The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Golden State Warriors at Chase Center in San Francisco, overcoming a 38-point first quarter from Golden State and producing four consecutive quarters of 31 or more points. De’Aaron Fox led the Spurs with 27 points, while Victor Wembanyama added 26 points and nine rebounds. For Golden State, Draymond Green, De’Anthony Melton, and Moses Moody each scored 17 points.
The game was particularly interesting because the Warriors started strongly but could not maintain their offensive pace. Golden State scored 38 points in the opening quarter, but its production dropped to 29, 27, and 19 points over the final three periods. San Antonio, meanwhile, scored 31, 32, 31, and 32 points. That consistency ultimately turned a competitive opening into an emphatic Spurs victory.
This matchup also provides useful insight into how individual production, shooting efficiency, playmaking, rebounding, turnovers, and plus-minus numbers can tell different parts of the same game. Looking only at the leading scorers would miss several important reasons why San Antonio controlled the second half.
Golden State Warriors vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game took place on February 12, 2026, at Chase Center, with an attendance of 18,064. San Antonio entered the contest with a 38-16 overall record and a 19-10 road record. Golden State entered at 29-26 overall and 18-10 at home.
San Antonio won 126-113, improving its position in what was a competitive matchup between two teams with very different statistical profiles on the night.
Final Score by Quarter
| Quarter | San Antonio Spurs | Golden State Warriors |
| 1st | 31 | 38 |
| 2nd | 32 | 29 |
| 3rd | 31 | 27 |
| 4th | 32 | 19 |
| Final | 126 | 113 |
The quarter-by-quarter scoring is one of the clearest indicators of the game’s progression.
Golden State had the better opening period, scoring 38 points. San Antonio responded immediately in the second quarter by scoring 32 while limiting Golden State to 29. The third quarter continued the Spurs’ momentum, and the fourth quarter became the decisive period.
San Antonio scored 32 points in the final quarter while Golden State managed only 19. A 13-point fourth-quarter advantage was enough to turn the contest into a comfortable Spurs win.
How San Antonio Won the Game
San Antonio’s victory was not based on one statistical category alone. The Spurs combined efficient shooting, strong free throw production, balanced scoring, excellent playmaking, and low turnover volume.
The Spurs finished 46-for-93 from the field, 10-for-39 from three-point range, and 24-for-28 from the free throw line. Golden State finished 42-for-91 from the field, 16-for-47 from three, and 13-for-17 from the free throw line.
At first glance, Golden State’s three-point numbers appear superior because the Warriors made 16 threes compared with 10 for San Antonio. However, the Spurs created an advantage in other areas, particularly two-point scoring, free throw accuracy, and overall offensive balance.
San Antonio also recorded 35 assists and only nine turnovers. Golden State actually recorded 37 assists, but had 11 turnovers.
The two-point scoring difference was important. San Antonio’s 46 made field goals included a much stronger overall conversion rate than Golden State’s 42 makes, despite Golden State attempting 47 threes.
Team Statistical Comparison
| Category | Spurs | Warriors |
| Field Goals | 46-93 | 42-91 |
| Three-Pointers | 10-39 | 16-47 |
| Free Throws | 24-28 | 13-17 |
| Rebounds | 44 | 40 |
| Assists | 35 | 37 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 11 |
| Steals | 6 | 6 |
| Blocks | 5 | 1 |
The numbers show why the final result was not simply a matter of three-point shooting.
Golden State made six more three-pointers, but San Antonio made 11 more field goals overall. The Spurs also made 11 more free throws. Those differences helped offset the Warriors’ advantage from beyond the arc.
De’Aaron Fox Leads San Antonio With 27 Points
De’Aaron Fox was the leading scorer in the game, finishing with 27 points in 32 minutes.
His shooting line was particularly efficient:
- 27 points
- 11-for-16 from the field
- 3-for-5 from three-point range
- 2-for-2 from the free throw line
- 8 assists
- 3 steals
- 2 turnovers
- 0 rebounds
- Plus-6
Fox’s 11-for-16 shooting translated to a field goal percentage of 68.8 percent. He also made three of his five attempts from three, giving him an effective scoring night without requiring a high volume of shots.
His eight assists were equally important. Fox was not simply acting as a scoring option. He also helped organize the Spurs’ offense and create opportunities for teammates.
The combination of 27 points and eight assists made him one of the most influential offensive players on the floor.
His three steals also contributed to San Antonio’s ability to generate defensive possessions. While the box score does not describe every defensive action, three steals from the starting guard position are a meaningful contribution.
Victor Wembanyama Provides Two-Way Production
Victor Wembanyama finished with 26 points, nine rebounds, four assists, one steal, and two blocks in 33 minutes.
His shooting statistics were:
- 26 points
- 8-for-17 field goals
- 2-for-9 three-pointers
- 8-for-10 free throws
- 9 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 1 steal
- 2 blocks
- 1 turnover
- Plus-7
Wembanyama’s offensive efficiency was respectable despite the difficult three-point shooting. He made eight of his 17 field goal attempts and eight of his 10 free throws.
The free throw numbers are especially relevant because they helped him turn scoring opportunities into reliable points. His nine rebounds also strengthened San Antonio’s work on the glass.
The two blocks provide another important dimension. The Spurs finished the game with five blocks as a team, while Golden State recorded only one. Wembanyama accounted for two of San Antonio’s five blocks.
This is why evaluating his contribution only through his 26 points would be incomplete. His rebounding, rim protection, passing, and ability to draw defensive attention all influenced the matchup.
Keldon Johnson Adds 21 Points From the Bench
Keldon Johnson delivered one of San Antonio’s most valuable supporting performances.
He scored 21 points in 29 minutes while shooting 8-for-13 from the field. He also made two of six three-point attempts and all three of his free throws.
His complete line included:
- 21 points
- 8-for-13 field goals
- 2-for-6 three-pointers
- 3-for-3 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 1 turnover
- 1 steal
- Plus-22
The plus-22 figure is particularly notable. Johnson was not simply productive as an individual scorer. San Antonio also performed very well during his minutes on the court.
His six rebounds gave the Spurs additional support in the frontcourt, while his three-for-three free throw shooting helped maintain scoring efficiency.
Dylan Harper’s Efficient Playmaking
Dylan Harper was another important contributor for San Antonio.
He played 29 minutes and recorded 14 points, five rebounds, eight assists, and no turnovers.
His shooting line was 6-for-10 from the field, 1-for-3 from three, and 1-for-1 from the free throw line.
The eight assists without a turnover stand out. San Antonio’s team total of only nine turnovers was one of the defining statistical characteristics of the game.
Harper’s performance therefore had value beyond his 14 points. He helped move the ball while avoiding wasted possessions.
His plus-17 rating also suggests that San Antonio had strong overall results during his minutes.
Harrison Barnes Makes an Impact Without High Scoring
Harrison Barnes scored eight points in 22 minutes, but his plus-29 was the highest individual plus-minus number listed for either team.
Barnes shot 3-for-7 from the field and 0-for-4 from three. He added four rebounds, three assists, and committed no turnovers.
The plus-29 number is a useful reminder that plus-minus should not be treated as an individual performance score in isolation.
A player can score eight points and still have a major positive impact on the team’s overall performance. Lineups, defensive assignments, ball movement, rebounding, and the performance of teammates all influence plus-minus.
Barnes’ game is therefore an excellent example of why box-score analysis should include more than points and shooting percentage.
Stephon Castle’s Difficult Shooting Night
Stephon Castle finished with 10 points, five rebounds, and four assists in 21 minutes.
He shot 4-for-12 from the field and 0-for-1 from three. He made two of his three free throws.
His plus-minus was minus-17, the lowest among the listed Spurs players.
Castle’s performance shows the difference between individual statistics and overall team outcome. San Antonio won comfortably, but not every individual player produced efficiently.
His four assists and five rebounds still provided value, but the 4-for-12 shooting line indicates that scoring efficiency was not consistent across the Spurs’ lineup.
Julian Champagnie Struggles to Score
Julian Champagnie started for San Antonio and played 20 minutes.
He finished without a point, going 0-for-3 from the field and 0-for-3 from three-point range. He recorded three rebounds, one assist, and one block.
Despite the lack of scoring, his statistical contribution was not entirely empty. He added three rebounds, an assist, and a block.
This is another reason analysts should avoid defining a player’s performance solely through points.
Golden State’s Leading Scorers
Golden State had three players tied for the team scoring lead at 17 points: Draymond Green, De’Anthony Melton, and Moses Moody.
However, their routes to those 17 points were very different.
Draymond Green
Draymond Green played 30 minutes and produced 17 points, 12 rebounds, and eight assists.
His shooting line:
- 6-for-14 field goals
- 2-for-8 three-pointers
- 3-for-4 free throws
- 12 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 2 turnovers
- Minus-5
Green’s 12 rebounds were the highest total among the listed Warriors players.
His eight assists also tied his own team-leading playmaking output with Melton. The combination of 17 points, 12 rebounds, and eight assists gave him one of Golden State’s most complete statistical performances.
However, his plus-minus was minus-5, reflecting the fact that San Antonio still outscored Golden State during his minutes.
De’Anthony Melton
Melton was arguably Golden State’s most efficient scorer.
He scored 17 points while shooting 6-for-7 from the field and 5-for-6 from three-point range.
That means he made 85.7 percent of his field goal attempts and 83.3 percent of his three-point attempts.
He also recorded three rebounds and seven assists in 25 minutes.
His plus-12 was the best plus-minus among the listed Warriors players.
Melton’s performance demonstrates that a strong individual shooting night does not automatically translate into a team victory. His numbers were highly efficient, but Golden State still lost by 13 points.
Moses Moody
Moses Moody played 35 minutes, the highest total among the listed Warriors starters.
He recorded 17 points, four rebounds, and two assists while shooting:
- 6-for-12 from the field
- 3-for-8 from three
- 2-for-2 from the free throw line
Moody’s three-point shooting helped Golden State maintain its long-range advantage.
However, the Warriors needed more sustained offensive production from the entire lineup, particularly during the fourth quarter.
Brandin Podziemski Leads Golden State in Minutes
Brandin Podziemski played 36 minutes, the highest playing time among the listed Warriors players.
He finished with 16 points, five rebounds, two assists, one steal, and one turnover.
His shooting numbers were 5-for-12 from the field and 1-for-4 from three. He was perfect from the free throw line, making all five attempts.
Despite his 16 points and strong free throw shooting, his plus-minus was minus-27.
That number should be interpreted carefully. It does not mean Podziemski personally caused the 27-point differential. Plus-minus reflects the team’s scoring margin while a player is on the floor and is influenced by teammates, opponents, rotations, and lineup combinations.
Still, the number is significant enough to warrant attention when evaluating the game’s flow.
Quinten Post Provides Efficient Bench Scoring
Quinten Post scored 12 points in only 13 minutes.
He shot 4-for-6 from the field and 3-for-5 from three-point range. He also recorded three rebounds and two assists.
His plus-minus was plus-1.
Post’s performance gave Golden State another efficient perimeter scoring option from the bench. His three made three-pointers were particularly useful in a game where the Warriors ultimately made 16 threes.
His production also illustrates a major theme of the game: Golden State had several efficient individual stretches but could not sustain them across all four quarters.
Gary Payton II Adds Playmaking and Defense
Gary Payton II recorded 10 points in 14 minutes.
He shot 4-for-11 from the field and 2-for-7 from three. He added five assists, one steal, and one block.
His plus-minus was minus-12.
Although his shooting efficiency was limited, his five assists in 14 minutes show that he contributed as a secondary creator. The steal and block also added defensive value.
Al Horford’s Numbers
Al Horford played 26 minutes and finished with six points, four rebounds, and one assist.
He shot 3-for-7 from the field and 0-for-4 from three.
His plus-minus was minus-16.
The four missed three-point attempts mattered in a game where Golden State relied heavily on perimeter shooting. Horford’s inability to convert from outside reduced some of the spacing value the Warriors could have received from his position.
Gui Santos Provides Defensive Activity
Gui Santos scored nine points in 30 minutes while contributing five rebounds, six assists, and four steals.
He shot 4-for-11 from the field and 0-for-3 from three.
His four steals were the highest individual total listed for either team.
His offensive shooting was not particularly efficient, but his defensive activity and six assists provided other forms of value.
Pat Spencer’s Contribution
Pat Spencer played 31 minutes and recorded nine points, four rebounds, and four assists.
He shot 4-for-11 from the field and 0-for-2 from three.
His plus-minus was minus-14.
The numbers indicate a difficult offensive night, especially from outside, but he still contributed as a passer and rebounder.
Shooting Efficiency Was a Major Difference
The overall shooting numbers deserve close attention.
San Antonio made 46 of 93 field goal attempts. That is approximately 49.5 percent.
Golden State made 42 of 91, or approximately 46.2 percent.
The difference was not enormous, but San Antonio’s superior overall field goal percentage mattered because the Spurs also attempted 28 free throws and made 24.
Golden State attempted 17 free throws and made 13.
The Warriors had the clear three-point advantage:
- Spurs: 10-for-39, approximately 25.6 percent
- Warriors: 16-for-47, approximately 34.0 percent
Yet Golden State’s long-range advantage was not enough to overcome San Antonio’s stronger overall field goal production and free throw volume.
This is an important lesson when analyzing basketball statistics. Three-point percentage is valuable, but it is only one component of scoring efficiency.
Rebounding Favored San Antonio
San Antonio finished with 44 rebounds compared with 40 for Golden State.
The four-rebound advantage was modest, but it helped the Spurs control additional possessions and limit Golden State’s ability to create second chances.
Wembanyama recorded nine rebounds, Johnson six, Harper five, and several other Spurs players contributed four or three each.
For Golden State, Green led with 12 rebounds. Santos and Podziemski each recorded five, while Moody and several other players contributed four.
The Warriors therefore received strong rebounding production from Green, but San Antonio’s overall team total remained higher.
Assists Showed Both Teams’ Ball Movement
Golden State actually finished with more assists, 37 compared with 35 for San Antonio.
That is an important detail because it shows that the Spurs did not win simply because the Warriors failed to pass the ball.
Both teams demonstrated strong ball movement.
For San Antonio, Fox recorded eight assists and Harper also recorded eight. Wembanyama added four, while Barnes contributed three.
For Golden State, Green had eight assists, Melton had seven, and Santos had six. Payton II added five.
The difference came elsewhere, particularly in shooting efficiency, free throw production, rebounding, turnovers, and fourth-quarter scoring.
Turnovers Helped San Antonio Maintain Control
San Antonio committed nine turnovers.
Golden State committed 11.
The two-turnover difference was not enormous, but in a game decided by 13 points, every possession had value.
The Spurs also received strong individual ball security from several players. Dylan Harper, Harrison Barnes, and Carter Bryant all finished without a turnover in the listed statistics.
Harper’s eight assists with zero turnovers were especially impressive.
The Fourth Quarter Decided the Game
The fourth quarter was the clearest turning point.
San Antonio scored 32 points.
Golden State scored 19.
That 13-point difference exactly matched the final margin.
Golden State had already fallen behind after the Spurs outscored them in both the second and third quarters. The Warriors needed a strong closing period to reverse the momentum.
Instead, San Antonio continued producing at a high level while Golden State’s offense slowed dramatically.
This makes the fourth quarter more important than the opening 38-point performance by the Warriors. The first quarter demonstrated Golden State’s offensive potential. The final quarter demonstrated San Antonio’s ability to sustain pressure.
Why the Warriors’ 16 Three-Pointers Were Not Enough
Golden State’s 16 made three-pointers might initially suggest that the Warriors should have been in position to win.
However, the Spurs made 46 field goals overall compared with 42 for Golden State. San Antonio also made 24 free throws compared with 13 for the Warriors.
The Warriors therefore gained an advantage from outside shooting but lost ground through other scoring channels.
Golden State attempted 47 three-pointers out of 91 total field goal attempts. More than half of its field goal attempts came from beyond the arc.
That strategy can produce large scoring swings, but it also creates vulnerability when perimeter shots stop falling.
The fourth quarter showed that vulnerability. Golden State scored only 19 points in the closing period, while San Antonio continued to score 32.
Plus-Minus Highlights the Game’s Lineup Story
The plus-minus numbers provide another interesting layer.
For San Antonio, Harrison Barnes recorded plus-29, Keldon Johnson plus-22, Dylan Harper plus-17, and Luke Kornet plus-8.
For Golden State, Melton recorded plus-12 and Quinten Post plus-1. Several other Warriors players were negative, including Podziemski at minus-27 and Horford at minus-16.
Again, plus-minus should not be used as a standalone measure of individual quality. But when several players from one team’s successful lineups have strong positive numbers, it can help identify periods when the team controlled the game.
Players Who Were Unavailable
The Warriors listed two players as unavailable.
Kristaps Porzingis was listed with a left Achilles tendon issue, while Will Richard was listed with a right knee contusion.
Neither player appeared in the game.
Their absence is relevant when interpreting Golden State’s rotation and available scoring options, although the box-score data alone cannot establish exactly how their absence changed the game’s outcome.
Matchup History Around the Game
The supplied matchup data shows three games around this February 12 meeting:
- November 13: Warriors 125, Spurs 120
- November 15: Warriors 109, Spurs 108
- February 12: Spurs 126, Warriors 113
At the time of the February 12 game, Golden State had won the first two meetings, while San Antonio won the third.
The result therefore demonstrated that the Spurs had adjusted successfully after losing the first two encounters.
The supplied schedule also lists a fourth meeting on April 2, when the Warriors won 127-113. Because that game occurred after the February 12 contest, it should not be used to change the interpretation of the February matchup itself.
Most Important Player Performances
Several performances stand above the rest when the complete statistics are considered.
De’Aaron Fox
Fox combined 27 points with eight assists and three steals while shooting 11-for-16 from the field. His efficient scoring and playmaking made him San Antonio’s primary offensive driver.
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama recorded 26 points, nine rebounds, four assists, one steal, and two blocks. His contribution covered scoring, rebounding, passing, and rim protection.
Keldon Johnson
Johnson supplied 21 points, six rebounds, and two assists while shooting 8-for-13. His plus-22 also stood out.
Dylan Harper
Harper’s 14 points and eight assists were valuable, particularly because he committed no turnovers.
De’Anthony Melton
Melton was Golden State’s most efficient scorer, making six of seven field goals and five of six three-pointers.
Draymond Green
Green delivered an all-around statistical line with 17 points, 12 rebounds, and eight assists.
Moses Moody
Moody scored 17 points in 35 minutes and contributed three made three-pointers.
Brandin Podziemski
Podziemski played 36 minutes and scored 16 points, making all five free throws.
What the Player Stats Reveal About the Match
The deeper lesson from this matchup is that the final score was created by consistency rather than one overwhelming statistical category.
Golden State had strong individual performances. Melton was extremely efficient. Green nearly produced a triple-double. Moody scored 17 points. Podziemski added 16. The Warriors made 16 three-pointers and recorded 37 assists.
Yet San Antonio had more consistent scoring across all four quarters.
The Spurs also had multiple players who could create offense. Fox scored 27, Wembanyama scored 26, Johnson scored 21, and Harper scored 14.
That balanced production reduced the pressure on any single player.
The Spurs also converted 24 of 28 free throws, compared with 13 of 17 for Golden State. That 11-point difference at the free throw line was large enough to offset much of the Warriors’ three-point advantage.
A Practical Way to Read This Box Score
For readers who want to understand basketball player statistics rather than simply collect numbers, this game provides a useful framework.
Start with the final score, then examine the quarter breakdown.
Next, compare total field goals, three-pointers, and free throws. After that, examine rebounds, assists, and turnovers.
Only then should you move into individual player statistics.
For individual players, consider:
- Points
- Field goal attempts and percentage
- Three-point production
- Free throw efficiency
- Rebounds
- Assists
- Turnovers
- Steals and blocks
- Minutes played
- Plus-minus
This approach prevents one statistic from dominating the analysis.
For example, Golden State’s 16 made three-pointers look impressive. But when combined with 42 total field goals, 13 made free throws, 40 rebounds, and 11 turnovers, the broader picture becomes clearer.
Likewise, Wembanyama’s 26 points are important, but his nine rebounds, four assists, and two blocks show why his contribution was broader than scoring.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Warriors vs Spurs game?
De’Aaron Fox was the game’s leading scorer with 27 points. Victor Wembanyama followed with 26 points for San Antonio.
What was the final score between the Spurs and Warriors?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Golden State Warriors 126-113 on February 12, 2026, at Chase Center.
Who led the Warriors in scoring?
Draymond Green, De’Anthony Melton, and Moses Moody each scored 17 points to lead Golden State.
How many three-pointers did the Warriors make?
Golden State made 16 of 47 three-point attempts. San Antonio made 10 of 39.
How many rebounds did Victor Wembanyama have?
Wembanyama recorded nine rebounds in 33 minutes.
Which player had the highest plus-minus?
Harrison Barnes had the highest listed plus-minus at plus-29. Keldon Johnson was next at plus-22.
Conclusion
The golden state warriors vs san antonio spurs match player stats from February 12, 2026, show why San Antonio’s 126-113 victory cannot be explained by scoring alone.
De’Aaron Fox led the Spurs with 27 points and eight assists, while Victor Wembanyama added 26 points, nine rebounds, four assists, and two blocks. Keldon Johnson supplied 21 points, and Dylan Harper contributed 14 points and eight assists without a turnover.
Golden State had its own strong individual performances. Draymond Green posted 17 points, 12 rebounds, and eight assists. De’Anthony Melton scored 17 points with outstanding shooting efficiency, while Moses Moody also scored 17. Brandin Podziemski added 16 points.
The most important difference was San Antonio’s consistency. The Spurs scored at least 31 points in every quarter, while Golden State’s production fell sharply from 38 points in the first quarter to only 19 in the fourth.
The Warriors’ 16 three-pointers and 37 assists demonstrate that they had productive offensive stretches. However, San Antonio compensated with 46 made field goals, 24 made free throws, 44 rebounds, only nine turnovers, and balanced scoring from several players.
For anyone studying player statistics, this matchup is a useful example of why a complete box-score analysis should combine individual production with team-level efficiency and quarter-by-quarter performance. The most meaningful story is not simply who scored the most points, but how those points, possessions, rebounds, assists, shooting percentages, and defensive plays combined to determine the result.
