Celtics vs Lakers Match Player Stats
The celtics vs lakers match player stats from December 6, 2025, tell a clear story of Boston’s offensive control and efficient three-point shooting. The Celtics defeated the Los Angeles Lakers 126-105 at TD Garden in Boston, with 19,156 fans attending the game. Boston built a 22-point advantage after the first quarter and maintained control for the rest of the night.
The final score alone does not explain why the game developed into a comfortable Celtics victory. The team statistics show a major difference in shooting efficiency, ball movement, three-point production, and overall offensive execution. Boston shot 55% from the field and made 24 of 45 three-point attempts, while Los Angeles shot 43% overall and converted 14 of 35 from beyond the arc.
Jaylen Brown led Boston with 30 points, eight rebounds, and eight assists. Derrick White added 19 points, five rebounds, and six assists, while Jordan Walsh produced an efficient 17-point performance on 6-of-7 shooting. For Los Angeles, Austin Reaves was the standout scorer with 36 points and eight assists, but his individual production could not overcome Boston’s superior team shooting and balanced scoring.
This detailed breakdown examines the player statistics, team numbers, scoring pattern, shooting efficiency, plus/minus figures, and the main factors that separated the Celtics from the Lakers.
Celtics vs Lakers Match Player Stats
The Celtics entered this matchup with a strong offensive performance across the starting lineup and bench. Boston finished with 126 points while shooting 46-of-84 from the field. That 55% field-goal rate was one of the most important statistical differences in the game.
The Lakers scored 105 points on 33-of-77 shooting. Their 43% field-goal percentage was respectable in isolation, but it was significantly lower than Boston’s 55%.
The difference became even clearer from three-point range.
Boston made 24 of 45 three-point attempts, producing a 53% three-point percentage. Los Angeles made 14 of 35, finishing at 40%.
That means Boston made 10 more three-pointers than Los Angeles while attempting only 10 additional shots from behind the arc. This created a major scoring advantage without requiring Boston to dominate the free-throw line.
Final Score
| Team | Final Score |
| Boston Celtics | 126 |
| Los Angeles Lakers | 105 |
Boston won by 21 points.
The Celtics’ advantage was established immediately. Boston scored 39 points in the opening quarter while Los Angeles scored only 17.
That 22-point first-quarter difference became the foundation of the result.
First Quarter Set the Tone
The opening quarter was arguably the most important scoring period of the game.
Boston scored 39 points, while Los Angeles managed 17. The Celtics therefore entered the second quarter with a 22-point lead.
The Lakers improved offensively in the second quarter, scoring 29 points. However, Boston still scored 30, meaning Los Angeles did not make meaningful progress on the deficit before halftime.
The halftime scoring totals were:
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Halftime |
| Celtics | 39 | 30 | 69 |
| Lakers | 17 | 29 | 46 |
Boston led 69-46 at halftime.
The third quarter was the Lakers’ best scoring period. Los Angeles produced 36 points, while Boston scored 28. That gave the Lakers a chance to reduce the margin.
However, the Celtics still carried a 15-point advantage into the final quarter.
Boston then scored 29 points in the fourth quarter compared with 23 from Los Angeles.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring
| Quarter | Celtics | Lakers |
| Q1 | 39 | 17 |
| Q2 | 30 | 29 |
| Q3 | 28 | 36 |
| Q4 | 29 | 23 |
| Total | 126 | 105 |
The scoring pattern shows that the Lakers did have stretches of offensive success. Their 36-point third quarter was particularly strong.
The problem was the size of the early deficit.
Celtics Offensive Efficiency
Boston’s offensive numbers were impressive across almost every major shooting category.
The Celtics shot 46-of-84 from the field, which produced a 55% field-goal percentage. They also converted 24-of-45 three-point attempts.
That combination is difficult for an opponent to overcome.
Boston’s team shooting numbers were:
| Category | Celtics |
| Field Goals | 46-84 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 55% |
| Three-Pointers | 24-45 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 53% |
| Free Throws | 10-12 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 83% |
| Rebounds | 38 |
| Assists | 31 |
| Turnovers | 14 |
| Steals | 9 |
| Blocks | 5 |
One of the most notable figures is the 31 assists.
Boston’s offense was not built around one player taking a huge percentage of the team’s shots. The Celtics generated scoring opportunities throughout the lineup.
The 24 made three-pointers were also crucial. Boston scored 72 points from three-point field goals alone.
That represented more than half of the team’s total score.
Lakers Offensive Production
Los Angeles scored 105 points and shot 33-of-77 from the field.
The Lakers were effective from the free-throw line, making 25 of 29 attempts for an 86% success rate. However, their lower field-goal efficiency and lower three-point output limited their overall scoring.
| Category | Lakers |
| Field Goals | 33-77 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 43% |
| Three-Pointers | 14-35 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 40% |
| Free Throws | 25-29 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 86% |
| Rebounds | 35 |
| Assists | 15 |
| Turnovers | 14 |
| Steals | 8 |
| Blocks | 2 |
The Lakers actually performed well at the free-throw line.
Their 25 made free throws were 15 more than Boston’s 10. However, Boston’s advantage in field goals and three-pointers was much larger than the Lakers’ free-throw advantage.
This is an important lesson when analyzing basketball statistics. A team can win the free-throw battle and still lose comfortably if its opponent creates much more efficient scoring from the field.
Austin Reaves Leads the Lakers
Austin Reaves was the Lakers’ leading scorer with 36 points.
His complete statistical line included:
- 36 points
- 3 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 9-of-18 field goals
- 3-of-8 three-pointers
- 15-of-17 free throws
- Plus/minus of -9
Reaves accounted for more than one-third of Los Angeles’ 105 points.
His 15 made free throws were particularly significant. He converted 15 of 17 attempts from the line, giving the Lakers a major source of efficient scoring.
His eight assists also showed that his contribution was not limited to scoring.
However, the plus/minus figure of -9 indicates that his team was still outscored during his overall time on the floor.
This is one reason individual statistics should always be viewed alongside team statistics.
A player can produce an excellent scoring performance while the opponent still controls the game through broader team efficiency.
Gabe Vincent Provides Secondary Scoring
Gabe Vincent finished with 18 points for Los Angeles.
He shot 5-of-10 from the field and made 4-of-8 three-point attempts.
His line included:
- 18 points
- 1 rebound
- 1 assist
- 5-of-10 field goals
- 4-of-8 three-pointers
- Plus/minus of -20
Vincent’s three-point shooting was efficient, but his plus/minus was the lowest among the Lakers’ listed starters.
The -20 figure reflects the broader team difficulty during his minutes rather than simply measuring his individual shooting performance.
Rui Hachimura’s Two-Way Contribution
Rui Hachimura recorded 13 points and seven rebounds.
He shot 5-of-11 from the field and 3-of-7 from three-point range.
His statistical line was:
- 13 points
- 7 rebounds
- 5-of-11 field goals
- 3-of-7 three-pointers
- Plus/minus of -15
Hachimura provided useful perimeter scoring and rebounding, but Boston’s overall shooting advantage remained too large.
Deandre Ayton Controls the Glass
Deandre Ayton scored six points while collecting 10 rebounds.
He also recorded one steal and one block.
His shooting line was 3-of-9 from the field.
The Lakers had 35 total rebounds, and Ayton’s 10 were an important individual contribution.
However, the Celtics still finished with 38 team rebounds.
The three-rebound overall difference was not enormous, which means rebounding alone does not explain the 21-point result.
Shooting efficiency was much more important.
Other Lakers Player Performances
Jake LaRavia finished with six points, one rebound, and one assist.
Dalton Knecht scored five points and made three of four free throws.
Nick Smith Jr. provided 13 points, two rebounds, and two steals. He shot 5-of-10 from the field and 3-of-6 from three-point range.
Jaxson Hayes recorded three points, four rebounds, and one steal.
Bronny James scored five points, added one assist, and shot 2-of-3 from the field and 1-of-2 from three-point range. He finished with a plus/minus of +2.
Maxi Kleber did not score but collected one rebound and finished at +4.
Drew Timme also did not score, but he recorded two rebounds and three assists while finishing at +2.
Adou Thiero finished with three rebounds, including two offensive rebounds.
These contributions show that the Lakers received production from multiple players, but the distribution was not enough to match Boston’s overall offensive efficiency.
Jaylen Brown Leads Boston
Jaylen Brown was Boston’s leading scorer with 30 points.
He added eight rebounds and eight assists, giving him a broad statistical contribution across scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.
His shooting numbers were:
- 30 points
- 8 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 10-of-22 field goals
- 3-of-7 three-pointers
- 7-of-9 free throws
- Plus/minus of +12
Brown’s eight assists are particularly notable because they show that his offensive impact extended beyond scoring.
He did not need to rely entirely on difficult individual shots. Boston’s offense continued generating opportunities through multiple players.
Derrick White’s Complete Performance
Derrick White finished with 19 points, five rebounds, and six assists.
He shot 7-of-14 from the field and 5-of-10 from three-point range.
He also recorded one block.
His plus/minus was +19.
White’s five made three-pointers were a major part of Boston’s perimeter efficiency.
His combination of shooting and playmaking helped keep the Celtics’ offense balanced.
Jordan Walsh’s Efficient Shooting
Jordan Walsh produced one of the most efficient individual performances in the game.
He scored 17 points while making 6-of-7 field-goal attempts.
He also made 4-of-5 three-point attempts.
Walsh added four rebounds, one assist, and two blocks.
His plus/minus was +28, the highest listed figure among Celtics players.
The shooting efficiency stands out immediately.
Walsh attempted seven shots and made six. From three-point range, he converted four of five.
That type of efficiency can significantly change the pressure placed on an opposing defense.
Payton Pritchard Adds Scoring and Playmaking
Payton Pritchard scored 15 points and added two rebounds and six assists.
He shot 6-of-13 from the field and 3-of-7 from three-point range.
His plus/minus was +15.
The six assists were important because they contributed to Boston’s 31 total assists.
Pritchard’s combination of scoring and passing gave Boston another player capable of creating offensive value.
Neemias Queta Provides Interior Production
Neemias Queta scored 10 points while collecting six rebounds and two assists.
He shot 5-of-8 from the field.
He also recorded two steals and finished with a plus/minus of +8.
Queta’s 10 points came efficiently, as he made five of his eight field-goal attempts.
His rebounding and defensive activity added further value beyond his scoring total.
Celtics Bench Production
Boston’s bench also contributed meaningful production.
Sam Hauser scored 12 points and made four of seven three-point attempts. He also collected three rebounds and two steals.
Josh Minott scored six points, grabbed three rebounds, and recorded three assists. He shot 2-of-3 from the field and 2-of-3 from three-point range while finishing at +21.
Anfernee Simons added eight points, four rebounds, and two assists. He made two of four field goals and two of four three-pointers and finished at +23.
Baylor Scheierman scored three points, grabbed one rebound, recorded two assists and two steals, and made one of two three-point attempts.
Hugo Gonzalez scored four points on 2-of-2 shooting.
Xavier Tillman scored two points on 1-of-1 shooting.
Amari Williams and Luka Garza did not score. Garza recorded one assist and one block.
The Celtics’ bench numbers reinforce the overall theme of the game. Boston received useful production from several players rather than depending exclusively on its leading scorer.
Comparing the Starting Lineups
The starting lineups provide another useful way to understand the result.
Lakers Starters
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | +/- |
| Rui Hachimura | 13 | 7 | 0 | 5-11 | 3-7 | -15 |
| Jake LaRavia | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0 listed | -14 |
| Deandre Ayton | 6 | 10 | 0 | 3-9 | 0 listed | -7 |
| Gabe Vincent | 18 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 4-8 | -20 |
| Austin Reaves | 36 | 3 | 8 | 9-18 | 3-8 | -9 |
The Lakers’ starting lineup produced strong scoring from Reaves and Vincent.
However, the lineup’s combined shooting efficiency could not keep pace with Boston.
Celtics Starters
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | +/- |
| Neemias Queta | 10 | 6 | 2 | 5-8 | 0 listed | +8 |
| Derrick White | 19 | 5 | 6 | 7-14 | 5-10 | +19 |
| Jaylen Brown | 30 | 8 | 8 | 10-22 | 3-7 | +12 |
| Payton Pritchard | 15 | 2 | 6 | 6-13 | 3-7 | +15 |
| Jordan Walsh | 17 | 4 | 1 | 6-7 | 4-5 | +28 |
Boston’s starting lineup had five players scoring at least 10 points.
That balance made it much harder for Los Angeles to concentrate its defensive attention on one or two scorers.
Shooting Was the Biggest Statistical Difference
The clearest difference in the game was shooting.
Boston made 46 field goals.
Los Angeles made 33.
That is a difference of 13 made field goals.
The Celtics also made 24 three-pointers compared with 14 for the Lakers.
That is a 10-three-pointer advantage.
The teams’ shooting comparison makes the difference easy to see:
| Shooting Category | Celtics | Lakers |
| Field Goals Made | 46 | 33 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 84 | 77 |
| FG Percentage | 55% | 43% |
| 3PT Made | 24 | 14 |
| 3PT Attempted | 45 | 35 |
| 3PT Percentage | 53% | 40% |
| FT Made | 10 | 25 |
| FT Attempted | 12 | 29 |
| FT Percentage | 83% | 86% |
The Lakers were actually more productive at the free-throw line.
However, the Celtics created a much larger advantage through field goals and three-pointers.
This is why looking at only one statistical category can produce an incomplete interpretation of a basketball game.
Boston’s Ball Movement Stands Out
The Celtics recorded 31 assists.
The Lakers recorded 15.
That is a difference of 16 assists.
Boston therefore generated considerably more assisted offense according to the team box score.
Jaylen Brown had eight assists, Derrick White had six, and Payton Pritchard had six.
Those three players alone accounted for 20 Celtics assists.
This distribution is important because it demonstrates that Boston’s passing was not concentrated in a single playmaker.
The Celtics had multiple players contributing to offensive creation.
Turnovers Were Even
Both teams recorded 14 turnovers.
That means turnovers did not create a major statistical separation.
| Team | Turnovers |
| Celtics | 14 |
| Lakers | 14 |
Because the turnover totals were identical, the difference in the final score was driven more heavily by what happened after possessions were converted into shots.
Boston simply converted those opportunities at a much higher rate.
Rebounding Was Relatively Close
The Celtics recorded 38 rebounds.
The Lakers recorded 35.
Boston therefore held only a three-rebound advantage.
The Lakers had 10 offensive rebounds, compared with eight for Boston.
Defensively, Boston recorded 30 defensive rebounds while Los Angeles had 25.
The rebounding numbers therefore do not indicate a dominant Celtics advantage on the glass.
Instead, they reinforce the importance of shooting and ball movement in this matchup.
Defensive Statistics
Boston recorded nine steals and five blocks.
Los Angeles recorded eight steals and two blocks.
The defensive comparison was:
| Defensive Category | Celtics | Lakers |
| Steals | 9 | 8 |
| Blocks | 5 | 2 |
| Personal Fouls | 20 | 14 |
Boston produced three more blocks and one more steal.
However, the Celtics also committed six more personal fouls.
The Lakers benefited from 29 free-throw attempts, compared with only 12 for Boston.
That explains why Los Angeles scored 25 free throws despite trailing substantially in field-goal production.
Plus/Minus Breakdown
Plus/minus provides useful context, although it should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual performance.
For Boston, Jordan Walsh recorded the highest listed plus/minus at +28.
Anfernee Simons was +23.
Josh Minott was +21.
Derrick White was +19.
For Los Angeles, Bronny James finished at +2, Drew Timme at +2, and Maxi Kleber at +4 among the players with positive figures.
The difference across the starting groups is especially noticeable.
All five listed Celtics starters finished with positive plus/minus figures.
All five listed Lakers starters finished with negative figures.
That reflects Boston’s control across the stretches in which its starters were on the court.
What the Box Score Says About the Game
The box score points to several clear conclusions.
1. Boston Won the Shooting Battle
The Celtics shot 55% overall compared with 43% for the Lakers.
That 12-percentage-point gap is substantial.
2. Boston Won the Three-Point Battle
Boston made 24 threes.
Los Angeles made 14.
The 10-made-three difference created a major scoring advantage.
3. Boston Moved the Ball Better
The Celtics had 31 assists.
The Lakers had 15.
That 16-assist gap is one of the strongest statistical differences in the box score.
4. Los Angeles Had Strong Free-Throw Production
The Lakers made 25 free throws.
Boston made 10.
The Lakers were also more accurate at the line, shooting 86% compared with Boston’s 83%.
5. The First Quarter Created the Separation
Boston led 39-17 after one quarter.
Even though Los Angeles won the third quarter 36-28, the Lakers could not erase the early deficit.
Why Austin Reaves’ 36 Points Were Not Enough
Austin Reaves’ 36-point performance deserves individual attention.
He scored efficiently enough to become the Lakers’ clear offensive leader. His 15-of-17 free-throw shooting was especially productive.
Yet basketball is a team sport, and Boston’s offensive balance created a different statistical profile.
The Celtics had three players with at least 15 points among their starters, along with 10 points from Queta.
They also received double-digit scoring from Hauser off the bench.
That meant Boston could maintain scoring pressure even when one player was not responsible for the majority of the offense.
Reaves’ eight assists also show that he was contributing as a facilitator.
The problem was not simply his individual scoring output. The larger issue was the difference between the two teams’ total offensive efficiency.
Why Three-Point Shooting Mattered So Much
Three-point shooting can quickly change the scoring equation.
Boston attempted 45 three-pointers and made 24.
Los Angeles attempted 35 and made 14.
Boston therefore attempted 10 more threes and made 10 more.
The Celtics’ 53% accuracy from deep was also significantly higher than the Lakers’ 40%.
Jordan Walsh was particularly effective, making four of five.
Derrick White made five of 10.
Jaylen Brown and Payton Pritchard each made three.
Sam Hauser added four more from the bench.
The production was spread across the roster.
Season Series Context
The provided data records Boston as leading the season series 1-0 following the December 6 game.
The next listed meeting was played on February 23, 2026, with Boston winning 111-89.
That result means the two listed meetings both went in Boston’s favor.
For readers analyzing only the December matchup, however, the most important statistical story remains the same: Boston’s shooting efficiency and offensive distribution separated the teams.
Celtics vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The celtics vs lakers match player stats provide a detailed picture of how Boston produced a 21-point victory.
The most important figures include:
- Boston won 126-105.
- Boston scored 39 points in the first quarter.
- Los Angeles scored 17 points in the first quarter.
- Boston shot 55% from the field.
- Los Angeles shot 43% from the field.
- Boston made 24 three-pointers.
- Los Angeles made 14 three-pointers.
- Boston recorded 31 assists.
- Los Angeles recorded 15 assists.
- Both teams had 14 turnovers.
- Boston had 38 rebounds.
- Los Angeles had 35 rebounds.
- Jaylen Brown scored 30 points for Boston.
- Austin Reaves scored 36 points for Los Angeles.
- Jordan Walsh scored 17 points while shooting 6-of-7 from the field.
- Derrick White scored 19 points and made five three-pointers.
These numbers show why the final score was not simply the result of one high-scoring player.
Boston’s advantage came from several connected factors.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Celtics and Lakers?
The Boston Celtics defeated the Los Angeles Lakers 126-105 on December 6, 2025, at TD Garden in Boston.
Who scored the most points in the game?
Austin Reaves was the game’s leading scorer with 36 points. Jaylen Brown led Boston with 30 points.
How many three-pointers did the Celtics make?
Boston made 24 of 45 three-point attempts, shooting 53% from beyond the arc.
How many assists did each team record?
The Celtics recorded 31 assists, while the Lakers recorded 15 assists.
Who had the best listed plus/minus for Boston?
Jordan Walsh had the highest listed Celtics plus/minus at +28.
What was the biggest statistical difference between the teams?
Shooting efficiency and three-point production were the clearest differences. Boston shot 55% from the field and made 24 threes, while Los Angeles shot 43% and made 14 threes.
Conclusion
The celtics vs lakers match player stats from December 6, 2025, show a game defined by Boston’s offensive efficiency and depth of contribution.
The Celtics finished with 126 points, shot 55% from the field, made 24 three-pointers, and recorded 31 assists. Jaylen Brown led the team with 30 points, while Derrick White, Payton Pritchard, Jordan Walsh, and Neemias Queta all made meaningful contributions.
The Lakers had their own standout performance through Austin Reaves, who scored 36 points and added eight assists. Gabe Vincent also supplied 18 points, while Rui Hachimura and Deandre Ayton contributed in other areas.
The decisive difference was the overall team performance.
Boston’s 39-point first quarter created a large early advantage. The Lakers responded with a strong third quarter, but Boston’s shooting and ball movement prevented a complete comeback.
For anyone reviewing the box score, the most useful lesson is to look beyond the leading scorer. Field-goal percentage, three-point production, assists, quarter-by-quarter scoring, and player efficiency together provide a much clearer explanation of how this 126-105 result developed.
