Washington Wizards vs Knicks Match Player Stats

The washington wizards vs knicks match player stats from the New York Knicks’ 132-101 victory over the Washington Wizards provide a clear picture of how the game was controlled from the opening quarter. New York built a 16-point lead after the first period, extended it through halftime, and eventually won by 31 points at Capital One Arena. Mikal Bridges led the Knicks with 23 points, while Karl-Anthony Towns produced a major all-around contribution with 19 points and 15 rebounds in the official box score. Josh Hart added seven assists before leaving the game with an ankle injury, and Jalen Brunson contributed 21 points.

The Wizards had several useful individual performances despite the result. Will Riley led Washington with 17 points, while Bub Carrington scored 14 and Malaki Branham finished with 14 points and four assists. Alex Sarr collected nine rebounds and also scored 11 points, giving Washington one of its more productive interior performances.

The final margin tells only part of the story. The more important details appear in the shooting efficiency, ball movement, rebounding, turnover battle, and the way New York’s offense created consistent advantages throughout the game.

Washington Wizards vs Knicks Match Player Stats

The washington wizards vs knicks match player stats show a substantial statistical advantage for New York across several major categories.

Category	New York Knicks	Washington Wizards
Final Score	132	101
Field Goals	47-90	35-86
Field Goal %	52%	41%
Three-Pointers	17-37	11-31
Three-Point %	46%	35%
Free Throws	21-27	20-32
Free Throw %	78%	63%
Rebounds	50	42
Assists	34	19
Turnovers	9	13
Steals	6	6
Blocks	5	3
Points in the Paint	54	40
Fast-Break Points	18	12
Largest Lead	41	0

ESPN’s official matchup statistics show that New York led in field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, rebounds, assists, points in the paint, fast-break scoring, and turnover efficiency. The Knicks also held Washington to 41% shooting while making 52% of their own attempts.

That combination explains why the game became a comfortable Knicks victory rather than a close contest.

Game Overview

The Knicks entered the game with a 32-18 record, including a 12-12 road mark. Washington entered at 13-36 and was 9-17 at home. New York ultimately improved its winning streak to seven games with the 132-101 result.

The game was played at Capital One Arena in Washington, DC, with an announced attendance of 17,822.

New York’s offensive production was remarkably consistent. The Knicks scored 38 points in the first quarter, 34 in the second, 30 in the third, and another 30 in the fourth.

Washington’s quarter-by-quarter scoring was 22, 23, 26, and 30.

Quarter	Knicks	Wizards
First	38	22
Second	34	23
Third	30	26
Fourth	30	30
Total	132	101

The fourth quarter was the only period in which Washington matched New York’s scoring output. By then, however, the Knicks had already established a substantial advantage.

The 38-22 opening quarter was particularly important because it forced Washington to spend the remainder of the game trying to recover from an early deficit.

Knicks Player Stats Breakdown

Mikal Bridges

Mikal Bridges was New York’s leading scorer with 23 points.

He shot 8-for-10 from the field, made 3 of 4 three-point attempts, and went 4-for-5 from the free-throw line. He also recorded four rebounds, five assists, one turnover, and two blocks. His plus/minus was +23.

The efficiency is particularly notable.

Bridges did not need a high volume of shots to become the game’s leading scorer. His 8-for-10 field-goal performance produced an extremely efficient scoring night, while his three made three-pointers added another layer to New York’s spacing.

His five assists also demonstrate that his contribution was not limited to scoring.

Karl-Anthony Towns

Karl-Anthony Towns delivered one of the most important statistical performances for New York.

The official box score lists Towns with:

• 19 points
• 15 rebounds
• 7-for-16 shooting
• 1-for-4 from three-point range
• 4-for-6 from the free-throw line
• 3 assists
• 2 steals
• +30 plus/minus

His 15 rebounds were the highest total on either team.

The rebounding advantage mattered because New York finished with 50 total rebounds compared with Washington’s 42.

Towns’ 15-rebound performance also helped New York control possessions and limit second-chance opportunities. Washington did collect 10 offensive rebounds compared with New York’s nine, but the Knicks’ overall rebounding advantage remained eight boards.

Jalen Brunson

Jalen Brunson scored 21 points in 31 minutes.

He shot 7-for-16 from the field and 6-for-7 from the free-throw line. He also recorded one rebound, four assists, and two steals without committing a turnover. His plus/minus was +32.

The zero turnovers are especially useful when examining New York’s offensive control.

Brunson was able to produce 21 points and four assists while avoiding a turnover, allowing the Knicks to maintain efficient possessions against a Washington defense that needed to create extra opportunities.

OG Anunoby

OG Anunoby scored 19 points on 6-for-11 shooting.

He made three of his six three-point attempts and four of five free throws. He also recorded four rebounds, two assists, one steal, and one block.

His +13 plus/minus indicates that New York remained comfortably ahead during his minutes.

Anunoby’s shooting efficiency was another important part of the Knicks’ perimeter attack. Washington could not focus exclusively on Brunson, Towns, or Bridges because New York had several players capable of converting open opportunities.

Josh Hart

Josh Hart had one of the more unusual stat lines of the game.

He scored only four points, but he recorded:

• 7 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 1-for-3 shooting
• 1-for-2 free throws
• 0 turnovers
• +34 plus/minus

His seven assists tied the game-high, while his seven rebounds showed how much he contributed outside the scoring column.

Hart’s role demonstrates why a player-by-player analysis should not focus only on points.

The Knicks already had several high-level scoring options. Hart could therefore influence the game through rebounding, passing, and possession management.

ESPN’s recap also reported that Hart left the game in the third quarter with a sprained left ankle and did not return.

Knicks Bench Production

New York also received useful contributions from its reserves.

Guerschon Yabusele scored 12 points and grabbed nine rebounds. Jordan Clarkson scored 12 points, while Landry Shamet added 14 points after shooting 5-for-8 from the field and 4-for-6 from three-point range.

Ariel Hukporti contributed five points and two blocks.

This depth was important because New York did not depend entirely on its starting five to generate offense.

The Knicks finished with 34 assists, meaning a large portion of their scoring came through shared offensive creation rather than isolated individual possessions.

Washington Wizards Player Stats Breakdown

Will Riley

Will Riley led Washington with 17 points.

He played 25 minutes and shot 5-for-11 from the field, including 2-for-5 from three-point range. He also made 5 of 6 free throws and finished with six rebounds and one assist.

Riley’s scoring output was the highest on the Wizards, but the overall offensive efficiency of Washington remained below New York’s level.

His 17 points represented a useful individual contribution in a game where Washington struggled to maintain consistent scoring.

Bub Carrington

Bub Carrington scored 14 points on 4-for-10 shooting.

He made three of seven three-point attempts and three of six free throws. Carrington added two rebounds and one assist.

His perimeter shooting helped Washington maintain some spacing, but New York’s defensive and offensive efficiency prevented the Wizards from turning those individual contributions into a competitive overall performance.

Malaki Branham

Malaki Branham also scored 14 points.

He shot 4-for-8 from the field and made his only three-point attempt. He was perfect on five free-throw attempts and recorded four assists, four rebounds, and one steal.

Branham’s four assists were tied for the highest total among Washington players.

His ability to contribute both scoring and passing gave Washington another source of offensive production, although the Wizards finished with only 19 team assists.

Alex Sarr

Alex Sarr recorded 11 points and nine rebounds.

He shot 4-for-11 from the field and made one of three three-point attempts. He also had three assists and one steal.

Sarr’s nine rebounds were the best total among Washington’s starters and second only to Towns’ 15 rebounds in the game.

His interior presence was one of the more useful aspects of Washington’s performance, but New York’s overall rebounding advantage and 54-40 edge in points in the paint showed that the Knicks still controlled the interior scoring battle.

Khris Middleton

Khris Middleton finished with 12 points.

He shot 5-for-11 from the field and made two of four three-point attempts. He added two rebounds and two assists.

Middleton provided efficient enough shooting to remain a scoring option, but Washington needed more collective offensive production to match New York’s 132 points.

Kyshawn George and Bilal Coulibaly

Kyshawn George scored eight points, grabbed two rebounds, and recorded three assists.

Bilal Coulibaly finished with three points, two rebounds, two assists, and one steal.

Their individual numbers highlight one of Washington’s biggest challenges in this matchup: several players contributed in limited roles, but the team did not have enough high-efficiency scoring to keep pace with New York.

Why the Knicks Won by 31 Points

The 31-point final margin can be traced to several measurable advantages rather than a single statistic.

1. Shooting Efficiency

The Knicks shot 52% from the field, while Washington shot 41%.

That 11-percentage-point difference is enormous over 90 and 86 field-goal attempts.

New York made 47 field goals. Washington made 35.

That means the Knicks converted 12 more field goals despite attempting only four additional shots.

This is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the final score.

2. Three-Point Shooting

New York made 17 of 37 three-point attempts for 46%.

Washington made 11 of 31 for 35%.

The Knicks therefore made six more three-pointers while also shooting at a significantly higher percentage.

Those additional three-point makes alone represented 18 extra points compared with Washington’s total from beyond the arc.

3. Ball Movement

The assist numbers were dramatically different.

New York recorded 34 assists, while Washington recorded 19.

That 15-assist difference is one of the defining characteristics of the game.

The Knicks were not simply making difficult individual shots. Their offense generated a high volume of assisted scoring opportunities.

Hart’s seven assists, Bridges’ five, Brunson’s four, and Anunoby’s two combined with strong contributions from the bench.

4. Turnover Control

New York committed only nine turnovers.

Washington committed 13.

The four-turnover difference may appear modest, but it became more significant because Washington scored 16 points off turnovers while New York scored only eight points off Washington’s turnovers.

That means Washington generated eight more points from turnovers than New York did.

Still, the Wizards could not compensate for the Knicks’ superior shooting and ball movement.

5. Interior Scoring

New York scored 54 points in the paint, compared with 40 for Washington.

That 14-point advantage indicates that the Knicks were not dependent solely on outside shooting.

The combination of Towns’ interior presence, Brunson’s driving ability, Bridges’ finishing, and contributions from other players gave New York multiple ways to score.

6. Rebounding

New York won the overall rebounding battle 50-42.

Towns’ 15 rebounds were central to that advantage.

Washington did have a slight edge in offensive rebounds, 10-9, but New York dominated defensive rebounding with 41 defensive boards compared with Washington’s 32.

That helped the Knicks end defensive possessions and start their own transition opportunities.

A Closer Look at the Quarter-by-Quarter Battle

First Quarter: Knicks Establish Control

New York opened with 38 points while Washington scored 22.

The 16-point first-quarter advantage immediately changed the nature of the contest.

Instead of playing from an even starting point, Washington spent the rest of the game attempting to reduce a significant deficit.

Second Quarter: New York Extends the Lead

The Knicks scored another 34 points in the second quarter.

Washington managed 23.

At halftime, New York had scored 72 points compared with Washington’s 45.

That 27-point halftime difference was the foundation of the eventual 31-point victory.

Third Quarter: Washington Shows Resistance

Washington improved offensively in the third quarter, scoring 26 points.

The Knicks still produced 30.

The Wizards therefore reduced the quarter deficit slightly but could not generate the sustained run needed to change the game.

This was also the period in which Hart left the game with his ankle injury.

Fourth Quarter: Statistical Balance Arrives Too Late

Both teams scored 30 points in the fourth quarter.

That even scoring shows that Washington was capable of matching New York when the game had already been largely decided.

The problem was the damage created during the first three quarters.

A 31-point final margin does not mean Washington was outscored by 31 in every stage of the game. The decisive separation occurred much earlier.

What the Shooting Numbers Tell Us

One of the strongest lessons from this matchup is that field-goal percentage can matter more than raw attempts.

New York attempted 90 shots.

Washington attempted 86.

That is only a four-shot difference.

Yet the Knicks made 47 attempts compared with 35 for Washington.

The result was a 12-field-goal advantage.

New York’s 52% shooting also meant that the Knicks generated considerably more value from approximately the same number of possessions.

The three-point numbers strengthened the difference.

New York’s 17 made threes represented 46% shooting from distance, while Washington’s 11 made threes represented 35%.

The Knicks therefore combined volume and efficiency from the perimeter.

Free Throw Comparison

The free-throw numbers also favored New York in efficiency.

The Knicks went 21-for-27, or 78%.

Washington went 20-for-32, or 63%.

Interestingly, the total number of made free throws was nearly identical.

The difference came from Washington needing 32 attempts to make 20 free throws, while New York needed only 27 attempts to make 21.

This means free throws were not the main reason for the 31-point margin.

The bigger factors were field-goal shooting, three-point shooting, assists, rebounding, and points in the paint.

The Importance of Team Assists

The 34-19 assist difference deserves special attention.

Basketball is often reduced to scoring totals, but assists can reveal how an offense creates those points.

New York’s 34 assists indicate widespread involvement.

Brunson created opportunities.

Hart created opportunities.

Bridges created opportunities.

Other Knicks players also contributed to the passing sequence.

Washington, by contrast, finished with 19 assists.

That difference suggests New York generated a much more connected offensive performance.

For readers studying player statistics, this is a useful reminder that a player’s value cannot always be understood from points alone.

Hart is a perfect example.

He scored four points but recorded seven rebounds and seven assists.

His overall statistical influence was considerably larger than his scoring total suggests.

Plus/Minus Context

The plus/minus figures also provide useful context.

Among the Knicks starters, Brunson finished at +32, Towns at +30, Hart at +34, Bridges at +23, and Anunoby at +13.

Several bench players also posted positive figures.

For Washington, every starter finished with a negative plus/minus.

The team-level gap was consistent with the final score.

However, plus/minus should be interpreted as a game-context statistic rather than a standalone measure of individual ability. It reflects the team’s scoring margin while a player is on the court and can be affected by lineups, game state, and teammate performance.

What the Game Reveals About the Knicks

The most significant takeaway for New York is offensive balance.

The Knicks had five starters who could contribute in different ways.

Bridges led the team in scoring.

Towns controlled the glass.

Brunson produced 21 points and four assists without a turnover.

Hart contributed seven rebounds and seven assists before leaving the game.

Anunoby provided efficient perimeter shooting and defensive activity.

The bench then added several scoring contributions.

That balance makes it difficult for an opponent to eliminate every offensive option at once.

New York also demonstrated strong efficiency.

Shooting 52% from the field and 46% from three-point range in the same game creates an extremely difficult matchup for a defense.

What the Game Reveals About the Wizards

For Washington, the numbers point toward several areas that determined the result.

The first is shooting efficiency.

A 41% overall field-goal percentage and 35% three-point percentage made it difficult to keep pace with New York’s offense.

The second is passing.

Nineteen assists compared with New York’s 34 indicate a substantial difference in offensive creation.

The third is turnover management.

Washington committed 13 turnovers compared with nine by New York.

Although the Wizards scored more points off turnovers, they still gave New York too many opportunities to dictate the game.

There were also positive individual signs.

Riley led the team in scoring.

Sarr nearly recorded a double-double.

Branham contributed four assists.

Carrington made three three-pointers.

Those individual performances provide useful context beyond the final score.

Most Important Statistical Takeaways

For readers searching for the key numbers without reviewing the entire box score, these are the central figures:

• New York won 132-101.
• Mikal Bridges led all Knicks scorers with 23 points.
• Jalen Brunson scored 21 points.
• Karl-Anthony Towns recorded 19 points and 15 rebounds.
• Josh Hart had seven assists and seven rebounds.
• Will Riley led Washington with 17 points.
• Bub Carrington and Malaki Branham each scored 14.
• Alex Sarr recorded 11 points and nine rebounds.
• New York shot 52% from the field.
• Washington shot 41%.
• New York made 17 three-pointers.
• Washington made 11.
• New York recorded 34 assists.
• Washington recorded 19.
• New York had 50 rebounds.
• Washington had 42.
• The Knicks committed nine turnovers.
• The Wizards committed 13.
• New York’s largest lead was 41 points.

How to Read These Player Statistics Correctly

A useful box-score analysis should avoid treating one number as the entire story.

For example, Bridges’ 23 points make him the Knicks’ leading scorer, but Towns’ 15 rebounds were equally important to the team’s control of possessions.

Similarly, Hart’s four points might appear insignificant at first glance. His seven assists and seven rebounds provide a much clearer picture of his contribution.

On Washington’s side, Riley’s 17 points made him the team’s leading scorer, but his production did not overcome the team’s 41% shooting.

This is why player statistics are most useful when viewed together.

Points explain scoring.

Rebounds explain possession control.

Assists reveal offensive creation.

Turnovers reveal possession efficiency.

Shooting percentages show how efficiently opportunities were converted.

Plus/minus provides additional context about scoring margin during a player’s minutes.

Looking at all of these categories creates a more accurate picture of the game.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Knicks in scoring against the Wizards?

Mikal Bridges led New York with 23 points. He shot 8-for-10 from the field and made three of four three-point attempts.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Karl-Anthony Towns had the most rebounds with 15. Washington’s Alex Sarr led the Wizards with nine rebounds.

Who led the Wizards in scoring?

Will Riley led Washington with 17 points. He shot 5-for-11 from the field and made two three-pointers.

What was the final score between the Knicks and Wizards?

The New York Knicks defeated the Washington Wizards 132-101. New York led 38-22 after the first quarter and never surrendered the lead.

Which team shot better?

The Knicks shot 52% from the field compared with 41% for Washington. New York also shot 46% from three-point range, compared with 35% for the Wizards.

How many assists did each team record?

New York finished with 34 assists, while Washington recorded 19. The 15-assist difference was one of the clearest statistical advantages for the Knicks.

Conclusion

The washington wizards vs knicks match player stats tell a story of efficiency, balance, and early control.

New York’s 132-101 victory was built on a combination of strong shooting and effective team offense. The Knicks shot 52% from the field, made 17 three-pointers, collected 50 rebounds, and recorded 34 assists.

Mikal Bridges supplied the scoring lead with 23 points, while Karl-Anthony Towns controlled the boards with 15 rebounds. Jalen Brunson added 21 points, and Josh Hart contributed seven assists and seven rebounds before leaving the game with an ankle injury.

Washington had several individual contributors, with Will Riley leading the team with 17 points and Alex Sarr producing 11 points and nine rebounds. However, the Wizards shot 41% from the field and finished with 19 assists, making it difficult to match New York’s offensive efficiency.

The quarter-by-quarter numbers explain the final margin particularly well. New York scored 38 points in the opening quarter and led by 27 points at halftime. Washington played a more even fourth quarter, but by that stage the Knicks had already created an advantage that proved decisive.

The broader lesson from the box score is that individual scoring totals should be viewed alongside shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, turnovers, and overall team production. Those combined numbers provide a much clearer understanding of how this Knicks victory developed.