Golden State Warriors vs Pacers Match Player Stats

The golden state warriors vs pacers match player stats from November 10, 2025, tell the story of a dominant Golden State performance at Chase Center. The Warriors defeated the Indiana Pacers 114-83, securing a convincing 31-point victory in front of 18,064 fans in San Francisco. Jimmy Butler III led Golden State with 21 points, nine rebounds, and seven assists, while Andrew Nembhard delivered 14 points and nine assists for Indiana. The game remained relatively competitive during the first three quarters, but Golden State produced an outstanding 39-point fourth quarter to turn a manageable lead into a decisive win.

This matchup was particularly interesting because the two teams entered the contest with very different early-season records. Golden State had established a strong home record, while Indiana was struggling to find consistency, especially away from home. The final result reflected those differences, but the numbers also revealed specific basketball factors that made the Warriors more effective.

Beyond the final score, the game featured important performances from the Warriors’ supporting players, a significant turnover gap, and an Indiana offense that struggled to convert its scoring opportunities. The statistics provide a clearer understanding of how Golden State controlled the contest and why the Pacers could not recover during the final period.

Match Overview: Golden State Warriors vs Indiana Pacers

The November 10 meeting took place at Chase Center in San Francisco, California. Golden State entered the game looking to strengthen its position at home, while Indiana needed a better performance to improve its early-season record.

The Warriors controlled the scoreboard throughout the contest. Although Indiana remained within reach during the opening three quarters, Golden State gradually increased its advantage before delivering its strongest offensive performance in the fourth.

Complete Match Information

Match Detail	Information
Match	Golden State Warriors vs Indiana Pacers
Date	November 10, 2025
Competition	NBA Regular Season
Venue	Chase Center
Location	San Francisco, California
Attendance	18,064
Final Score	Warriors 114-83 Pacers
Winner	Golden State Warriors
Warriors Record	6-5
Warriors Home Record	5-0
Pacers Record	1-9
Pacers Away Record	0-5
Game Status	Final
ESPN Game ID	401810051
Season Series	Tied 1-1
Broadcasters	FanDuel Sports Network Indiana, NBC Sports Bay Area

Golden State’s 114 points came from a balanced offensive performance. Jimmy Butler was the leading scorer, but several teammates also contributed double-digit scoring performances.

Indiana had some individual contributions worth recognizing. Andrew Nembhard recorded 14 points and nine assists, while Jay Huff collected 11 rebounds and Isaiah Jackson scored 12 points. However, those performances were not enough to overcome the team’s shooting difficulties and turnover problems.

Golden State Warriors vs Pacers Match Player Stats: Complete Player Box Score

Individual statistics help explain how each team performed beyond the final result. Points show scoring production, rebounds indicate work on the glass, and assists provide insight into offensive creation.

The following tables include the available player statistics from the November 10 matchup.

Golden State Warriors Player Statistics

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	Plus/Minus
Jimmy Butler III	21	9	7	10-15	+19
Draymond Green	3	2	3	1-3	+14
Jonathan Kuminga	5	8	2	1-9	+2
Quinten Post	14	8	2	4-10	+17
Brandin Podziemski	14	6	1	4-11	+22
Trayce Jackson-Davis	4	0	0	2-2	+8
Gui Santos	3	2	0	1-3	+4
Al Horford	12	4	1	4-6	+9
Buddy Hield	8	4	2	3-7	+4
Gary Payton II	0	1	0	0-0	+4
Moses Moody	13	3	1	4-11	+22
Pat Spencer	2	0	2	0-3	+11
Will Richard	15	3	1	4-8	+19

Golden State received contributions from multiple areas of its rotation. Butler was the most productive overall player, but the supporting cast made the victory particularly convincing.

Five Warriors scored at least 12 points:

• Jimmy Butler III: 21 points
• Will Richard: 15 points
• Quinten Post: 14 points
• Brandin Podziemski: 14 points
• Moses Moody: 13 points
• Al Horford: 12 points

This distribution made the Warriors difficult to defend. Indiana could not concentrate its defensive attention on one scorer because several players were capable of contributing offensively.

Indiana Pacers Player Statistics

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	Plus/Minus
Isaiah Jackson	12	6	1	6-9	-13
Jarace Walker	12	2	0	4-14	-11
Jay Huff	12	11	2	5-11	-21
Andrew Nembhard	14	2	9	5-16	-10
Ben Sheppard	3	4	0	1-10	-17
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl	9	12	1	3-11	-22
Cody Martin	2	6	2	1-5	-25
Tony Bradley	6	6	1	2-6	+0
Monte Morris	8	2	4	3-5	-14
RayJ Dennis	5	1	0	2-4	-11
Taelon Peter	0	1	1	0-3	-11

Indiana’s offensive production was more limited than Golden State’s. Nembhard led the team in scoring and assists, while Jackson, Walker, and Huff each recorded 12 points.

The Pacers also had two players with double-digit rebounds:

• Jeremiah Robinson-Earl: 12 rebounds
• Jay Huff: 11 rebounds

However, their individual rebounding contributions did not translate into enough efficient scoring possessions.

Important Player Availability Information

Two notable Indiana players were unavailable according to the supplied game report:

Player	Status
Pascal Siakam	DNP, Rest
Aaron Nesmith	DNP, Right forearm injury

Their absence is relevant when evaluating Indiana’s offensive options and overall rotation. However, it would be inaccurate to attribute the entire defeat to these absences. The available players still had opportunities to compete, and the team’s shooting efficiency and ball security were major problems.

Jimmy Butler III Leads Golden State With an All-Around Performance

21 points | 9 rebounds | 7 assists | 10-of-15 field goals

Jimmy Butler III delivered the most complete individual performance of the evening. His 21 points led all players, but his contribution extended well beyond scoring.

Butler connected on 10 of his 15 field-goal attempts, demonstrating excellent shooting efficiency. He also collected nine rebounds and distributed seven assists.

His performance was important because Golden State did not need to rely on one-dimensional scoring. Butler contributed as a scorer, rebounder, and facilitator.

Butler’s Scoring Efficiency

Butler’s 10-of-15 shooting performance represented approximately 66.7% shooting from the field.

That is an important distinction when comparing his contribution with Indiana’s leading scorers.

Andrew Nembhard scored 14 points on 5-of-16 shooting, while Butler produced 21 points with fewer attempts.

Butler’s efficiency helped Golden State maintain offensive pressure without wasting as many possessions.

Rebounding and Playmaking

Nine rebounds placed Butler close to a double-double. His seven assists also demonstrated his ability to create opportunities for teammates.

A player who can score efficiently while contributing in these other areas gives an offense additional flexibility.

Butler’s contribution can be understood through three important areas:

1. Scoring: He led both teams with 21 points.
2. Rebounding: His nine rebounds helped Golden State compete on the glass.
3. Playmaking: His seven assists supported the Warriors’ balanced offensive production.

His plus/minus of +19 also showed that Golden State outscored Indiana by 19 points during his time on the court.

This does not mean Butler personally caused every scoring advantage, but it provides additional context for his positive impact during the game.

Andrew Nembhard Provides Indiana’s Strongest Playmaking Performance

14 points | 2 rebounds | 9 assists | 5-of-16 field goals

Andrew Nembhard was Indiana’s leading scorer and primary assist provider.

His nine assists were the highest individual total recorded by either team. That statistic deserves attention because it shows that Indiana still had some effective offensive creation despite losing by 31 points.

However, his shooting efficiency was less impressive.

Nembhard converted five of his 16 field-goal attempts, approximately 31.3%. He also made two of his nine three-point attempts.

His performance presented an interesting contrast. He was able to create opportunities for teammates, but his own scoring efficiency was limited.

Why His Nine Assists Matter

Assists are useful for understanding how players contribute to offensive possessions.

Nembhard’s nine assists suggest that he remained involved in creating scoring opportunities even when Indiana struggled to convert shots.

His playmaking was one of the few positive aspects of the Pacers’ offensive performance.

However, the team recorded 20 turnovers. That number indicates that Indiana struggled to maintain possession consistently.

For a team that depends on ball movement and coordinated offensive execution, losing possessions through turnovers can quickly reduce scoring opportunities.

Nembhard’s individual playmaking was productive, but the collective offense needed better execution.

Golden State’s Supporting Players Made the Difference

A major reason for the Warriors’ success was the contribution from players beyond their leading scorer.

In a 31-point victory, the supporting cast often reveals how effectively a team executed its overall game plan.

Golden State had several players who reached double figures, giving the offense multiple scoring options.

Will Richard Delivers 15 Points

Will Richard scored 15 points on 4-of-8 field-goal shooting and made seven of eight free throws.

His free-throw production was particularly important.

Richard converted 87.5% of his attempts from the free-throw line, helping Golden State add points without relying entirely on field goals.

His plus/minus was +19, indicating that the Warriors maintained a substantial advantage during his court time.

Quinten Post Adds 14 Points

Quinten Post finished with 14 points, eight rebounds, and two assists.

He converted four of his 10 field-goal attempts and made two of seven three-point attempts.

His eight rebounds were also valuable because they provided additional support around the basket.

Post’s combination of scoring and rebounding helped Golden State maintain balance across different positions.

Brandin Podziemski Contributes Across the Board

Brandin Podziemski recorded:

• 14 points
• Six rebounds
• One assist
• Four field goals made on 11 attempts
• +22 plus/minus

His plus/minus of +22 was among the strongest figures on the Warriors’ roster.

Podziemski’s scoring and rebounding helped the Warriors maintain offensive pressure throughout the contest.

Moses Moody Provides Additional Scoring

Moses Moody scored 13 points, including three successful three-pointers on nine attempts.

He finished with a +22 plus/minus, matching Podziemski for the highest reported figure among Golden State players.

His outside shooting was an important part of the Warriors’ offensive balance, even though the team did not shoot particularly well from beyond the arc overall.

Al Horford’s Efficient Shooting

Al Horford scored 12 points on four-of-six shooting from the field.

More importantly, he made all four of his three-point attempts.

That represented a 66.7% field-goal percentage and 100% three-point shooting.

Horford’s outside production gave Golden State another offensive option and demonstrated how different players contributed to the final result.

Indiana’s Rebounding Effort Was Not Enough

Indiana actually collected more total rebounds than Golden State.

The Pacers finished with 53 rebounds, compared with 50 for the Warriors.

At first glance, this might seem surprising considering the 31-point difference in the final score.

However, rebounding alone does not determine which team wins a basketball game.

Indiana recorded 14 offensive rebounds, three more than Golden State’s 11. This indicates that the Pacers created additional opportunities after missed shots.

The problem was converting those opportunities into points.

Jeremiah Robinson-Earl’s 12 Rebounds

Jeremiah Robinson-Earl led all players with 12 rebounds.

He also scored nine points and added one assist.

His rebounding contribution was valuable, particularly because Indiana needed additional possessions to compensate for its poor shooting.

However, he made only three of his 11 field-goal attempts.

The difference between collecting rebounds and converting second-chance opportunities is important. Indiana managed the first task reasonably well but struggled with the second.

Jay Huff Records a Double-Double

Jay Huff finished with 12 points and 11 rebounds.

His performance was one of the most productive individual efforts for Indiana.

He made five of 11 field-goal attempts and converted two of six three-point attempts.

Huff demonstrated his ability to contribute around the basket while also offering some outside shooting.

However, his -21 plus/minus reflected the difficulty Indiana experienced during his court time.

Isaiah Jackson’s Efficient Scoring

Isaiah Jackson scored 12 points on nine field-goal attempts, making six.

His 66.7% field-goal percentage was among Indiana’s more efficient individual performances.

Jackson’s scoring efficiency was a positive aspect of his performance, although his overall contribution could not overcome the team’s offensive limitations.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Analysis

The final result did not happen immediately. Golden State gradually increased its lead before producing a decisive fourth-quarter performance.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring breakdown shows how the contest developed.

Complete Quarter Scores

Quarter	Indiana Pacers	Golden State Warriors
First Quarter	21	23
Second Quarter	20	25
Third Quarter	24	27
Fourth Quarter	18	39
Final Score	83	114

Golden State won every quarter.

The Warriors outscored Indiana by two points in the first quarter, five in the second, three in the third, and 21 in the fourth.

The fourth quarter was the biggest difference between the teams.

First Quarter: Golden State Takes an Early Lead

The opening period ended with Golden State leading 23-21.

Indiana remained competitive and stayed within two points.

The Pacers were not completely overwhelmed during the opening minutes, but Golden State managed to finish the quarter with a narrow advantage.

The two-point difference suggested that Indiana still had an opportunity to remain competitive if it could improve its offensive execution.

Second Quarter: Warriors Extend Their Advantage

Golden State scored 25 points in the second quarter, while Indiana managed 20.

The Warriors added five points to their advantage.

At halftime, Golden State had scored 48 points, compared with Indiana’s 41.

The seven-point margin was meaningful but not decisive.

Indiana remained close enough to potentially change the direction of the game with a stronger third-quarter performance.

Third Quarter: Golden State Maintains Control

The Warriors won the third quarter 27-24.

They entered the final period with a 10-point advantage.

Golden State had scored 75 points through three quarters, while Indiana had accumulated 65.

Although Indiana continued to score, it could not reduce the deficit.

The Warriors maintained their offensive consistency and entered the fourth quarter in a strong position.

Fourth Quarter: The Game Changes Completely

The final period was the most decisive part of the matchup.

Golden State scored 39 points, while Indiana managed only 18.

That created a 21-point difference in a single quarter.

The Warriors turned a 10-point lead into a 31-point victory.

This final stretch demonstrates why quarter-by-quarter analysis is important. Looking only at the final score would hide the fact that the game was relatively competitive during the first three periods.

Golden State’s ability to finish strongly was the defining feature of the contest.

Complete Team Statistics Comparison

Team statistics provide a broader understanding of the contest because they show how both teams performed collectively.

Golden State did not dominate every statistical category. Indiana actually finished with more rebounds and offensive rebounds. However, the Warriors were significantly more effective in several important areas, especially turnovers and overall field-goal efficiency.

Golden State Warriors vs Indiana Pacers Team Stats

Statistical Category	Warriors	Pacers
Total Points	114	83
Field Goals Made	38	32
Field Goals Attempted	88	94
Field-Goal Percentage	43%	34%
Three-Pointers Made	12	11
Three-Pointers Attempted	44	39
Three-Point Percentage	27%	28%
Free Throws Made	26	8
Free Throws Attempted	37	11
Free-Throw Percentage	70%	73%
Total Rebounds	50	53
Assists	22	21
Turnovers	10	20
Steals	11	7
Blocks	6	6
Offensive Rebounds	11	14
Defensive Rebounds	39	39
Personal Fouls	16	25

These numbers reveal several important differences.

Golden State had a clear advantage in field-goal percentage, free-throw production, steals, and turnovers.

Indiana’s advantages were limited mainly to total rebounds and offensive rebounds.

The statistics suggest that the Warriors were more efficient with their possessions, while Indiana struggled to turn its opportunities into points.

Shooting Efficiency: Why Golden State Scored More

One of the most important differences in this game was field-goal efficiency.

Golden State made 38 of 88 field-goal attempts, while Indiana converted 32 of 94 attempts.

This created a noticeable difference in shooting percentages.

Shooting Metric	Warriors	Pacers
Field-Goal Percentage	43%	34%
Three-Point Percentage	27%	28%
Free-Throw Percentage	70%	73%

Field-Goal Accuracy

The Warriors converted approximately 43.2% of their field-goal attempts.

Indiana converted approximately 34.0%.

That difference of roughly nine percentage points is significant.

Golden State made six more field goals despite attempting six fewer shots.

This is an important indicator of offensive efficiency.

Indiana had more attempts but struggled to convert them into successful baskets.

Three-Point Shooting

Three-point shooting was not a major advantage for Golden State in terms of percentage.

The Warriors made 12 of 44 attempts, producing approximately 27.3%.

Indiana made 11 of 39 attempts, producing approximately 28.2%.

The Pacers actually had a slightly higher three-point percentage.

However, the difference was very small, and Golden State made one additional three-pointer.

This suggests that the Warriors’ victory was not primarily built on superior three-point accuracy.

Instead, their advantage came from their overall field-goal production, free throws, and better possession management.

Free-Throw Production

The free-throw numbers show another important difference.

Golden State attempted 37 free throws and made 26.

Indiana attempted only 11 and made eight.

That gave the Warriors an 18-point advantage in successful free throws.

Golden State’s free-throw percentage was approximately 70.3%, while Indiana’s was approximately 72.7%.

Indiana was slightly more accurate from the line, but Golden State had far more opportunities.

This distinction is important because percentage and total production measure different things.

A team can have a higher free-throw percentage while scoring fewer points from the line.

That is exactly what happened in this matchup.

Turnovers: The Biggest Statistical Difference

Major Warriors advantage

Turnovers were one of the clearest explanations for the final result.

Golden State committed 10 turnovers, while Indiana committed 20.

Turnover Statistics	Warriors	Pacers
Total Turnovers	10	20
Difference		10 more

The Pacers committed twice as many turnovers as Golden State.

This difference is particularly important because every turnover represents a possession that ends without a shot attempt or a successful scoring opportunity.

Why Turnovers Matter

Basketball teams need to protect possession to maintain offensive rhythm.

When a team repeatedly loses the ball, it creates several problems:

• It reduces the number of available scoring opportunities.
• It prevents offensive possessions from reaching their intended conclusions.
• It can allow opponents to attack before the defense is organized.
• It puts additional pressure on players to score efficiently during fewer remaining possessions.

Golden State also recorded 11 steals, compared with Indiana’s seven.

This suggests that the Warriors were more successful at disrupting Indiana’s offensive execution.

However, the box score does not identify which turnovers directly resulted in transition points. Therefore, it would be inaccurate to assign a specific number of fast-break points to those mistakes without additional play-by-play data.

The reliable conclusion is that Golden State protected the ball significantly better.

Defensive Performance: Warriors Control the Game

Defense was another important part of the Warriors’ victory.

Indiana scored only 83 points, making it difficult to remain competitive throughout the contest.

Golden State recorded 11 steals and six blocks.

The Pacers also registered six blocks, but their defensive activity did not prevent the Warriors from reaching 114 points.

Golden State’s Defensive Contributions

The Warriors’ defensive performance was supported by multiple players.

Jimmy Butler finished with two steals.

Gary Payton II also recorded one steal despite not scoring.

Golden State’s team total of 11 steals indicates that the defensive effort extended beyond one player.

The Warriors also committed only 16 personal fouls, compared with Indiana’s 25.

Foul management matters because excessive fouls can give opponents additional opportunities at the free-throw line.

Indiana’s 25 personal fouls contributed to a game in which Golden State attempted 37 free throws.

Indiana’s Defensive Challenges

Indiana struggled to contain Golden State’s offensive production.

The Warriors had six players score at least 12 points.

That distribution created problems for the Pacers because different players contributed at different stages.

Defending a team with several scoring options requires consistent communication and effective defensive rotations.

The final result suggests that Indiana could not maintain that level of defensive organization, particularly during the fourth quarter.

Still, the available box score does not establish exactly which defensive assignments failed or how many points came from individual matchup errors. Those conclusions would require video or play-by-play analysis.

Plus/Minus Analysis: Which Players Had the Biggest Impact?

Plus/minus is a useful supporting statistic for understanding how a team performed while a particular player was on the court.

A positive number means the player’s team outscored its opponent during that player’s court time.

A negative number means the opponent scored more points during that period.

It is important to understand that plus/minus is not a direct measure of individual skill. It can be influenced by teammates, opponents, rotations, and the overall flow of the game.

Warriors’ Best Plus/Minus Performers

Player	Plus/Minus
Brandin Podziemski	+22
Moses Moody	+22
Jimmy Butler III	+19
Will Richard	+19
Quinten Post	+17
Draymond Green	+14
Pat Spencer	+11
Al Horford	+9

Podziemski and Moody recorded the highest reported plus/minus figures for Golden State at +22.

Butler and Richard followed with +19 each.

These figures show that Golden State maintained a strong scoring advantage across different player combinations.

The fact that several players finished with substantial positive numbers is consistent with the team’s balanced performance.

Pacers’ Plus/Minus Performers

Player	Plus/Minus
Tony Bradley	+0
Isaiah Jackson	-13
Jarace Walker	-11
Jay Huff	-21
Andrew Nembhard	-10
Ben Sheppard	-17
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl	-22
Cody Martin	-25
Monte Morris	-14
RayJ Dennis	-11
Taelon Peter	-11

Tony Bradley finished with a neutral plus/minus of zero.

Cody Martin recorded the lowest reported figure at -25, while Jeremiah Robinson-Earl finished at -22.

These numbers reflect the difficulty Indiana experienced during the game.

However, they should not be interpreted as proof that a particular player was responsible for the defeat. Plus/minus is a team-context statistic, not an isolated evaluation of an individual’s performance.

What the Match Statistics Reveal About Both Teams

The numbers provide several useful lessons about the strengths and weaknesses displayed by both teams.

Rather than focusing exclusively on the final score, it is useful to examine how Golden State created its advantage and where Indiana struggled.

1. Golden State Had Better Offensive Balance

The Warriors received double-digit scoring contributions from six players.

This was important because Butler did not have to carry the entire offensive workload.

Richard, Post, Podziemski, Moody, and Horford all reached double figures.

This type of distribution makes offensive preparation more complicated for an opposing defense.

Indiana had fewer consistent scoring options.

2. The Warriors Protected Possession Better

The 10-turnover difference was one of the clearest advantages in the game.

Golden State committed only 10 turnovers.

Indiana committed 20.

A team that protects the ball more effectively generally has more opportunities to complete offensive possessions.

The Warriors benefited from maintaining control, while Indiana repeatedly lost opportunities to create points.

3. Indiana Rebounded Better but Scored Less Efficiently

Indiana’s 53 rebounds were higher than Golden State’s 50.

The Pacers also collected 14 offensive rebounds.

Despite that advantage, they lost by 31 points.

This demonstrates why rebounding cannot be evaluated in isolation.

Rebounds create opportunities, but teams must convert those opportunities into successful offensive possessions.

Indiana struggled to do that consistently.

4. Free Throws Created a Significant Scoring Gap

Golden State made 26 free throws, while Indiana made eight.

The 18-point difference from the free-throw line was substantial.

It helped Golden State build its scoring advantage without depending entirely on outside shooting.

5. Golden State Finished Much Stronger

The Warriors entered the fourth quarter with a 10-point lead.

They then outscored Indiana by 21 points in the final period.

That performance turned a competitive game into a convincing victory.

The final quarter was arguably the most important part of the entire matchup.

Previous Meeting: Pacers Defeated Warriors 114-109

The November 10 victory was particularly interesting because it followed an earlier meeting between the teams.

According to the supplied matchup information, Indiana defeated Golden State 114-109 on November 2, 2025.

The November 10 result therefore represented a five-point reversal in the season series’ first meeting, followed by a 31-point Warriors victory in the second game.

Comparing the Two Results

Matchup	Winner	Final Score
November 2, 2025	Indiana Pacers	Pacers 114-109 Warriors
November 10, 2025	Golden State Warriors	Warriors 114-83 Pacers

The two games produced different outcomes.

Indiana scored 114 points in the November 2 meeting, while Golden State scored 114 points in the November 10 rematch.

The identical scoring total for the winning teams should not create confusion.

Golden State won the November 10 game by 31 points, while Indiana had won the earlier meeting by five points.

The supplied game information identifies the season series as tied 1-1 after the November 10 result.

What Changed in the Rematch?

The available statistics establish that Golden State performed much better in the second meeting.

However, without the complete box score for November 2, it would not be responsible to claim that a particular tactical adjustment or player change directly caused the reversal.

The November 10 numbers provide a more reliable explanation of the second game’s outcome:

• Golden State committed 10 turnovers.
• Indiana committed 20 turnovers.
• Golden State shot 43% from the field.
• Indiana shot 34% from the field.
• Golden State made 26 free throws.
• Indiana made eight free throws.
• The Warriors outscored the Pacers by 21 points in the fourth quarter.

These measurable differences help explain why the second meeting ended so differently.

How to Read Basketball Player Statistics Correctly

Understanding a box score is not simply about identifying the player with the most points.

Different statistical categories reveal different parts of a player’s contribution.

For readers following NBA games, understanding these categories makes player comparisons more meaningful.

Points (PTS)

Points represent the total number of points a player scores.

They can come from:

• Two-point field goals
• Three-point field goals
• Free throws

Butler’s 21 points made him the leading scorer in this matchup.

Rebounds (REB)

Rebounds measure how many times a player collects the ball after a missed shot.

There are two main categories:

• Offensive rebounds: Collected by the shooting player’s team.
• Defensive rebounds: Collected by the defending team.

Robinson-Earl led all players with 12 rebounds.

Assists (AST)

An assist is credited when a player makes a pass that directly leads to a teammate’s successful field goal, subject to the official scoring rules.

Nembhard recorded nine assists, the highest total in the game.

Field Goals (FG)

Field-goal statistics show successful shots compared with total attempts.

For example, Butler’s 10-of-15 performance means he made 10 shots from 15 attempts.

His field-goal percentage was approximately 66.7%.

Three-Point Field Goals (3PT)

Three-point statistics measure successful shots taken from beyond the three-point line.

Horford’s four successful three-pointers on six attempts represented one of Golden State’s most efficient outside shooting performances.

Steals (STL)

A steal occurs when a defensive player legally takes possession of the ball from the opposing team.

Golden State recorded 11 team steals.

Blocks (BLK)

A block occurs when a defensive player deflects or stops an opponent’s shot attempt.

Both teams recorded six blocks.

Plus/Minus (+/-)

Plus/minus represents the difference between the team’s points scored and points allowed while a player is on the court.

For example, Butler’s +19 means Golden State outscored Indiana by 19 points during his playing time.

It does not mean Butler personally scored 19 points more than his direct opponent.

Statistical Limitations and Important Context

A detailed box score is valuable, but it does not tell the complete story of a basketball game.

There are several factors readers should consider before making conclusions about individual players or team performance.

First, shooting percentages do not explain shot difficulty. A player who misses a difficult shot is not necessarily making a poor decision. Shot location, defensive pressure, and the offensive situation also matter.

Second, plus/minus depends on team combinations. A player may have a strong plus/minus because of the lineup around him. It should be considered alongside points, rebounds, assists, and shooting efficiency.

Third, rebounds do not automatically indicate offensive success. Indiana collected more rebounds than Golden State, but the Warriors still won comfortably.

Fourth, player availability affects team evaluation. Siakam and Nesmith did not participate, which reduced Indiana’s available options. However, their absence alone cannot explain the entire result.

Fifth, the supplied box score does not provide every advanced statistic. It does not include individual minutes, true shooting percentage, usage rate, defensive rating, or detailed shot-location information. These figures should not be invented or estimated as official statistics.

For the recorded results, the ESPN NBA box score provides the relevant game reference.

These limitations are important for anyone using the match data for player comparisons, basketball research, or statistical reporting.

Impact of the Victory on the Early-Season Team Records

The November 10 result had different implications for the two franchises.

Golden State improved to 6-5 overall and maintained an undefeated 5-0 home record. Indiana fell to 1-9 overall and remained winless in five away games.

Golden State Warriors: Maintaining Home-Court Strength

The Warriors’ 5-0 home record was an important part of their early-season performance.

Winning at home provides several benefits, including familiarity with the arena, regular playing conditions, and the opportunity to build consistency in front of home supporters.

The 114-83 victory also demonstrated that Golden State could receive contributions from multiple players rather than relying exclusively on its leading scorer.

Several aspects of the performance were encouraging:

• Butler delivered an efficient scoring performance.
• The supporting players contributed significant points.
• Golden State limited its turnovers to 10.
• The defense held Indiana to 83 points.
• The Warriors won all four quarters.

These results made the performance particularly convincing.

However, one game should not be treated as proof of long-term consistency. Golden State still had an overall record of 6-5 after this contest, leaving plenty of work ahead in the regular season.

Indiana Pacers: Searching for Consistency

Indiana’s 1-9 record showed that the team was experiencing a difficult opening stretch.

The 0-5 away record was another concern.

The November 10 game highlighted several areas that needed improvement:

1. Shooting efficiency: The Pacers converted only 34% of their field-goal attempts.
2. Ball security: Twenty turnovers created unnecessary problems.
3. Defensive consistency: Golden State scored 114 points.
4. Fourth-quarter execution: Indiana was outscored 39-18.
5. Scoring distribution: Only four Pacers reached double figures.

The team still had positive individual performances, particularly from Nembhard, Huff, and Jackson.

However, individual production needed to translate into better collective execution.

The most important lesson for Indiana was the need to protect possessions and improve its shooting efficiency.

Key Statistical Takeaways From the Game

For readers who want the most important information without reviewing every section, the following points summarize the matchup.

Category	Leading Team or Player	Result
Game Winner	Golden State Warriors	114-83
Highest Scorer	Jimmy Butler III	21 points
Pacers’ Highest Scorer	Andrew Nembhard	14 points
Most Rebounds	Jeremiah Robinson-Earl	12 rebounds
Warriors’ Top Rebounder	Jimmy Butler III	9 rebounds
Most Assists	Andrew Nembhard	9 assists
Warriors’ Top Assist Provider	Jimmy Butler III	7 assists
Highest Warriors Plus/Minus	Podziemski and Moody	+22
Most Team Rebounds	Indiana Pacers	53
Most Team Assists	Golden State Warriors	22
Fewest Turnovers	Golden State Warriors	10
Most Team Steals	Golden State Warriors	11
Biggest Quarter Advantage	Golden State Warriors	39-18 in Q4
Winning Margin	Golden State Warriors	31 points

These figures identify the most important individual and team contributions.

Butler was the most complete performer, Nembhard was Indiana’s leading playmaker, and Robinson-Earl dominated the individual rebounding category.

At the team level, Golden State’s shooting efficiency, turnover control, and fourth-quarter scoring were the biggest differences.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Golden State Warriors vs Indiana Pacers game on November 10, 2025?

The Golden State Warriors defeated the Indiana Pacers 114-83 on November 10, 2025, at Chase Center in San Francisco. Golden State won by 31 points.

2. Who was the highest scorer in the Warriors vs Pacers matchup?

Jimmy Butler III was the highest scorer with 21 points. He also recorded nine rebounds, seven assists, and 10 successful field goals on 15 attempts.

3. How many points did Andrew Nembhard score against the Warriors?

Andrew Nembhard scored 14 points for Indiana. He also recorded nine assists and two rebounds, making him the Pacers’ leading scorer and assist provider.

4. Which player recorded the most rebounds in the game?

Jeremiah Robinson-Earl led all players with 12 rebounds for Indiana. Jay Huff followed with 11 rebounds, while Jimmy Butler III led Golden State with nine.

5. What was the final score of each quarter?

The Warriors scored 23, 25, 27, and 39 points across the four quarters. Indiana scored 21, 20, 24, and 18 points. Golden State won every quarter.

6. How many turnovers did the Warriors and Pacers commit?

Golden State committed 10 turnovers, while Indiana committed 20. The Warriors therefore had 10 fewer turnovers, giving them a significant advantage in possession management.

Conclusion

The November 10, 2025, meeting between Golden State and Indiana was a convincing 114-83 victory for the Warriors. Jimmy Butler III led the scoring with 21 points while contributing nine rebounds and seven assists. Will Richard, Quinten Post, Brandin Podziemski, Moses Moody, and Al Horford also provided important offensive support.

Indiana had some positive individual performances. Andrew Nembhard recorded 14 points and nine assists, Jeremiah Robinson-Earl collected 12 rebounds, and Jay Huff finished with a double-double of 12 points and 11 rebounds.

However, the team statistics revealed why the Pacers struggled. They shot just 34% from the field and committed 20 turnovers. Golden State, meanwhile, converted 43% of its field-goal attempts, committed only 10 turnovers, and made 26 free throws.

The fourth quarter ultimately decided the contest. After leading by 10 points through three periods, Golden State scored 39 points in the final quarter while holding Indiana to just 18.

The golden state warriors vs pacers match player stats demonstrate that this victory was about more than Butler’s scoring performance. Balanced contributions, better possession management, and consistent execution helped Golden State secure its fifth consecutive home win of the season at that point.