Golden State Warriors vs Portland Trail Blazers Match Player Stats
The golden state warriors vs portland trail blazers match player stats from December 15, 2025, tell the story of a high-scoring game that Portland won 136-131 at Moda Center. Stephen Curry delivered one of his biggest individual scoring performances of the season with 48 points, but the Warriors could not overcome Portland’s balanced offensive attack, late-game execution, and superior rebounding.
The game was played in front of 19,064 fans and became the third meeting between the teams during the 2025 season. Portland completed a 3-0 season sweep, adding another win to earlier victories on October 25 and November 22.
What makes this matchup particularly interesting is that Golden State shot 51% from the field and 51% from three-point range, yet still lost. The Warriors made 24 three-pointers, received 48 points from Curry, and had several strong supporting performances. Portland responded by shooting the same 51% from the field, converting 20 threes, winning the rebounding battle 43-36, and making 26 of 29 free throws.
This breakdown examines the complete player production, team statistics, scoring patterns, and the individual performances that ultimately decided the game.
Golden State Warriors vs Portland Trail Blazers Match Player Stats
The final score was Portland Trail Blazers 136, Golden State Warriors 131.
The five-point margin does not fully explain how competitive the game was. Both teams produced offensive numbers that would normally be enough to win on many nights. Golden State scored at least 31 points in every quarter, while Portland reached 34 or more in three of the four periods.
The decisive difference came in the fourth quarter.
Portland scored 40 points in the final period compared with 32 from Golden State. That eight-point fourth-quarter advantage erased the Warriors’ earlier offensive production and gave the Trail Blazers enough separation to close out the game.
Final Team Comparison
| Category | Golden State Warriors | Portland Trail Blazers |
| Final Score | 131 | 136 |
| Field Goals | 44-87 | 45-89 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 51% | 51% |
| Three-Pointers | 24-47 | 20-39 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 51% | 51% |
| Free Throws | 19-23 | 26-29 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 83% | 90% |
| Rebounds | 36 | 43 |
| Assists | 34 | 30 |
| Turnovers | 18 | 17 |
| Steals | 14 | 11 |
| Blocks | 5 | 4 |
One of the clearest lessons from the box score is that three-point volume alone did not determine the result.
Golden State made four more three-pointers than Portland, but the Trail Blazers compensated with seven additional rebounds and seven more made free throws. Portland also converted its free throws at a 90% rate.
That combination gave Portland a strong scoring base even without matching Golden State’s three-point total.
Stephen Curry’s 48-Point Performance
Stephen Curry was easily the headline performer for Golden State.
He finished with:
- 35 minutes
- 48 points
- 16-of-26 field goals
- 12-of-19 three-pointers
- 4-of-4 free throws
- 3 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 3 steals
- 1 block
Curry’s 12 made three-pointers were particularly important because they represented half of Golden State’s 24 successful three-point attempts.
His 16-of-26 shooting also produced an excellent overall field-goal percentage of approximately 61.5%. From three-point range, he shot approximately 63.2%.
That means Curry was not simply accumulating points through volume. He was highly efficient while carrying an enormous portion of the Warriors’ scoring responsibility.
His 48 points represented roughly 36.6% of Golden State’s total scoring.
That statistic puts his workload into context. The Warriors scored 131 points, and Curry accounted for nearly 37% of them by himself.
Why Curry’s Performance Was Not Enough
A 48-point outing would normally put Golden State in an excellent position.
The problem was that Portland had multiple players producing at a high level.
Jerami Grant and Shaedon Sharpe each scored 35 points. Deni Avdija added 26 points. Together, those three Portland players accounted for 96 points.
That gave Portland a more distributed scoring attack.
Golden State had Curry at 48, followed by Jimmy Butler III at 16, Draymond Green at 14, and three players at 12 or fewer. Portland’s top three scorers combined for twice as many points as the next two Portland scorers combined.
This is one of the most important insights in the golden state warriors vs portland trail blazers match player stats. Curry was spectacular, but Portland was able to answer his individual dominance with collective scoring.
Jerami Grant’s 35 Points
Jerami Grant produced one of Portland’s two 35-point performances.
His statistical line was:
- 34 minutes
- 35 points
- 12-of-22 field goals
- 7-of-13 three-pointers
- 4-of-4 free throws
- 3 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 4 turnovers
- 1 block
Grant shot approximately 54.5% from the field and 53.8% from three-point range.
His seven made three-pointers were critical because Golden State could not simply focus on limiting Portland’s interior scoring.
Grant also provided efficient high-volume offense without needing a huge free-throw total. He made all four of his attempts from the line.
His 35 points accounted for approximately 25.7% of Portland’s 136 points.
Grant’s Offensive Efficiency
Grant’s line is impressive because he combined volume and accuracy.
He attempted 22 field goals and made 12. That is enough offensive involvement to influence the game substantially without turning every possession into a difficult shot.
His seven three-pointers also forced the Warriors to respect his perimeter shooting.
When a player is hitting more than half of his three-point attempts while simultaneously generating 35 points, defensive adjustments become difficult. Helping too aggressively can create open perimeter opportunities, while staying attached can leave driving lanes available.
Shaedon Sharpe Matches Grant With 35 Points
Shaedon Sharpe was equally important for Portland.
His final numbers were:
- 33 minutes
- 35 points
- 12-of-18 field goals
- 5-of-7 three-pointers
- 6-of-6 free throws
- 3 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 4 steals
Sharpe’s 12-of-18 shooting translated to 66.7% from the field.
He was also outstanding from beyond the arc, making five of seven attempts for approximately 71.4%.
His perfect 6-of-6 free-throw shooting added another six points without a missed opportunity.
Sharpe’s efficiency was arguably one of the most damaging elements of Portland’s offensive performance.
While Curry carried Golden State with spectacular scoring, Sharpe combined scoring efficiency with playmaking and defensive activity.
His four steals were tied for the most among Portland players listed in the supplied data and helped contribute to the Trail Blazers’ ability to generate extra possessions.
Deni Avdija’s All-Around Contribution
Deni Avdija finished with 26 points, making him Portland’s third major offensive contributor.
His numbers were:
- 33 minutes
- 26 points
- 6-of-16 field goals
- 2-of-4 three-pointers
- 12-of-13 free throws
- 7 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 4 turnovers
- 1 steal
Avdija’s most important contribution may have been his ability to create offense beyond scoring.
His eight assists were the highest total among the featured Portland players.
He also grabbed seven rebounds and went 12-of-13 at the free-throw line.
That means Avdija contributed in several areas that directly supported Portland’s winning formula.
His 26 points were not as efficient from the field as Grant or Sharpe, but his free-throw production significantly improved his scoring output.
The 12 made free throws also demonstrate how Portland repeatedly found ways to generate points without relying exclusively on jump shooting.
Jimmy Butler III’s 16 Points
Jimmy Butler III recorded 16 points in 35 minutes.
His full line was:
- 35 minutes
- 16 points
- 3-of-11 field goals
- 0-of-0 three-pointers
- 10-of-11 free throws
- 7 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 3 steals
Butler’s scoring efficiency from the field was below that of Golden State’s other major contributors. He made only three of his 11 attempts.
However, his free-throw performance kept his scoring respectable.
Butler made 10 of 11 from the line, accounting for more than half of his 16 points.
He also contributed seven rebounds, four assists, and three steals.
This is an important reminder that player value cannot always be judged by field-goal percentage alone. Butler’s box score shows significant contributions outside of shooting.
Draymond Green’s Complete Box Score
Draymond Green finished with 14 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists.
His statistical line included:
- 30 minutes
- 14 points
- 5-of-8 field goals
- 2-of-4 three-pointers
- 2-of-2 free throws
- 8 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 8 turnovers
- 3 steals
- 1 block
Green shot 62.5% from the field and 50% from three-point range.
His eight rebounds and seven assists were valuable, especially considering the Warriors were out-rebounded by seven overall.
However, the eight turnovers were also a major part of his game.
Golden State finished with 18 team turnovers, and Green’s eight represented nearly 44.4% of that total.
That does not mean every turnover directly became a Portland score, but it does highlight an area where Golden State lost possession efficiency.
Brandin Podziemski’s Efficient Supporting Performance
Brandin Podziemski contributed 12 points while shooting efficiently from the field and from three.
His line:
- 33 minutes
- 12 points
- 4-of-7 field goals
- 3-of-3 three-pointers
- 1-of-2 free throws
- 7 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 1 turnover
- 1 steal
Podziemski’s perfect 3-of-3 shooting from deep stands out.
More importantly, he paired that shooting with seven rebounds and six assists.
He also committed only one turnover.
From an efficiency perspective, this was one of Golden State’s cleaner supporting performances.
The issue was not that Podziemski played poorly. Instead, the Warriors needed more of this type of production from multiple players at the same time to match Portland’s three-player scoring surge.
Moses Moody’s 12 Points
Moses Moody finished with:
- 23 minutes
- 12 points
- 5-of-9 field goals
- 2-of-6 three-pointers
- 2 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 1 steal
- 1 block
Moody made five of his nine field-goal attempts, giving him a 55.6% field-goal percentage.
He also contributed on defense with a steal and a block.
His two made three-pointers added useful spacing to the Warriors’ offense, although his six attempts from deep were less efficient than those of Curry and Podziemski.
Quinten Post Adds 11 Points
Quinten Post played 19 minutes and scored 11 points.
He recorded:
- 11 points
- 4-of-9 field goals
- 3-of-6 three-pointers
- 1 rebound
- 4 assists
- 1 steal
Post’s three made three-pointers were an efficient contribution from a relatively limited number of attempts.
His four assists also added another layer to his performance.
The challenge for Golden State was that several of these positive supporting contributions did not collectively offset Portland’s top-end scoring.
Portland’s Supporting Cast
Portland’s starting group was not the only source of production.
Robert Williams III provided a particularly strong bench contribution with 11 points and 11 rebounds.
His double-double gave Portland additional size and second-chance potential.
Caleb Love added eight points and four assists, while Sidy Cissoko contributed six points and three rebounds.
These contributions were smaller than those of Grant, Sharpe, and Avdija, but they helped keep Portland’s offensive attack from becoming completely dependent on three players.
Golden State’s bench leaders included Buddy Hield with 10 points, Trayce Jackson-Davis with five points, four rebounds, and three assists, and Gui Santos with one point, two rebounds, and two assists.
The Rebounding Battle Favored Portland
One of the clearest statistical advantages in the game was rebounding.
Portland collected 43 rebounds compared with 36 for Golden State.
That seven-rebound advantage matters in a game decided by only five points.
Extra rebounds can lead to second-chance opportunities, reduce opponent possessions, and create additional opportunities for transition offense.
Robert Williams III’s 11 rebounds were especially important from the Portland bench.
Deni Avdija added seven, while Donovan Clingan grabbed 10.
Golden State had eight rebounds from Draymond Green and seven each from Jimmy Butler III and Brandin Podziemski.
Even with several strong individual rebounding performances, the Warriors still lost the overall battle.
Three-Point Shooting Was Almost Even in Percentage
At first glance, Golden State appears to have had a major advantage from three-point range.
The Warriors made 24 of 47 attempts.
Portland made 20 of 39.
Golden State therefore made four more three-pointers.
However, both teams shot exactly 51% from three according to the supplied team data.
The difference was volume.
Golden State attempted eight more threes and converted four more.
That advantage should normally be meaningful, but Portland’s superior free-throw production and rebounding helped neutralize it.
This is an important lesson when analyzing the golden state warriors vs portland trail blazers match player stats. A team can dominate one statistical category and still lose because basketball games are determined by the interaction of multiple possession-level factors.
Free Throws Helped Portland Win the Margin
Portland’s free-throw numbers were one of the biggest differences in the game.
The Trail Blazers made 26 of 29 attempts.
Golden State made 19 of 23.
That created a seven-point advantage in made free throws.
The final margin was five points.
In other words, Portland’s free-throw advantage alone was larger than the final difference between the teams.
Several Portland players were responsible for this efficiency.
Avdija made 12 of 13.
Sharpe made all six of his attempts.
Grant made all four.
Golden State also had strong free-throw shooting from Curry and Butler, but Portland generated more successful trips overall.
Turnovers Created a Different Story
Golden State finished with 18 turnovers.
Portland had 17.
That is only a one-turnover difference, but the distribution is noteworthy.
Draymond Green accounted for eight Warriors turnovers.
Avdija had four for Portland, while Grant had four.
Both teams therefore had key players who carried substantial creation responsibilities and also risked losing possessions.
Golden State’s 34 assists show that the offense generated significant ball movement.
Portland had 30 assists, which was six fewer.
Yet the Trail Blazers still won.
This suggests that Portland’s scoring efficiency and individual shot-making compensated for Golden State’s modest advantage in assist production.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The scoring progression provides another useful way to understand the result.
| Quarter | Warriors | Trail Blazers |
| First | 31 | 34 |
| Second | 31 | 27 |
| Third | 37 | 35 |
| Fourth | 32 | 40 |
| Final | 131 | 136 |
Portland started with a three-point advantage after the first quarter.
Golden State responded strongly in the second quarter, outscoring Portland 31-27.
The Warriors then produced their highest quarter of the game in the third, scoring 37 points.
At that point, the game remained firmly within reach.
The fourth quarter changed the outcome.
Portland exploded for 40 points while Golden State scored 32.
That eight-point difference was enough to turn an extremely close contest into a five-point Trail Blazers victory.
What Decided the Fourth Quarter?
The available box score does not provide every possession or play-by-play detail, so it would be inaccurate to claim that one specific tactical adjustment caused the fourth-quarter result.
However, the statistical evidence clearly shows the overall pattern.
Portland continued to generate efficient offense while maintaining its advantages in rebounding and free-throw production.
The Trail Blazers also had three major scoring options already operating at a high level.
Grant finished with 35.
Sharpe finished with 35.
Avdija finished with 26.
That made Portland difficult to contain late in the game.
Golden State had Curry’s extraordinary scoring output, but the Warriors did not receive an equivalent fourth-quarter scoring balance from the rest of the roster.
Team Efficiency and Shot-Making
Both teams finished with 51% field-goal shooting.
Golden State made 44 of 87 shots.
Portland made 45 of 89.
Those numbers are remarkably similar.
Portland made one additional field goal on two additional attempts.
The field-goal comparison therefore does not explain the result.
Three-point shooting also favored Golden State in volume but not percentage.
The biggest statistical separation came through:
- Rebounding
- Free-throw makes
- Slightly fewer turnovers
- Portland’s balanced top-end scoring
- Fourth-quarter scoring
This is why simply looking at field-goal percentage or total three-pointers can produce an incomplete conclusion.
The Importance of Shot Distribution
Golden State’s offense was heavily influenced by Curry.
His 48 points were extraordinary, but the Warriors needed more consistent scoring distribution around him.
Butler scored 16.
Green scored 14.
Podziemski and Moody each scored 12.
Post scored 11.
Hield added 10.
This means Golden State did receive several double-digit scoring contributions.
The problem was that Portland’s top three players combined for 96 points.
The Trail Blazers were able to produce elite scoring at the top of their lineup while still receiving meaningful bench production.
That balance made Curry’s historic-level shooting performance insufficient.
Golden State’s Defensive Activity
The Warriors recorded 14 steals and five blocks.
Those numbers demonstrate significant defensive activity.
Portland recorded 11 steals and four blocks.
Golden State therefore had a clear edge in steals and a small advantage in blocks.
Yet Portland still scored 136 points.
This is another example of why defensive counting statistics need context.
Steals can create extra possessions, but if the opponent is highly efficient with its half-court opportunities and converts free throws consistently, defensive activity alone may not be enough.
Donovan Clingan’s Defensive Impact
Donovan Clingan did not score much, finishing with only three points.
However, his defensive contribution was substantial.
He recorded:
- 22 minutes
- 3 points
- 1-of-3 field goals
- 1-of-2 free throws
- 10 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 1 turnover
- 1 steal
- 3 blocks
His three blocks were the highest listed total for Portland.
The 10 rebounds also helped explain Portland’s overall rebounding advantage.
This is an excellent example of why player evaluation should extend beyond points.
A player can have a modest scoring line while still influencing possession outcomes through rebounding, rim protection, passing, and defensive positioning.
Robert Williams III’s Bench Double-Double
Robert Williams III recorded 11 points and 11 rebounds from the bench.
That double-double was important because it gave Portland additional production without requiring another massive scoring night from the starting lineup.
His rebounding also strengthened Portland’s overall control of the glass.
In a five-point game, an 11-rebound bench performance can have a major effect even if it does not dominate the scoring column.
Season Series: Portland Swept All Three Meetings
The 2025 season series finished 3-0 in Portland’s favor.
The three results were:
- October 25, 2025: Portland 139, Golden State 119
- November 22, 2025: Portland 127, Golden State 123
- December 15, 2025: Portland 136, Golden State 131
The first meeting produced the largest Portland victory, with a 20-point margin.
The second meeting was much closer, with Portland winning by four.
The third game ended with a five-point Portland victory.
Across the season series, Portland repeatedly found ways to produce enough offense to beat Golden State.
The progression is especially interesting because the games became closer after the first matchup, but the overall result remained unchanged.
What the Season Series Says About the Matchup
A three-game sweep does not automatically prove that one roster is fundamentally better in every area.
It does show that Portland consistently found winning solutions against Golden State during this particular series.
The December game illustrates one of those solutions particularly well.
Portland did not need to outshoot Golden State from three-point range.
It did not need more assists.
It did not need more steals.
Instead, the Trail Blazers combined strong shooting, superior rebounding, excellent free-throw conversion, and three high-level scoring performances.
That was enough to overcome Curry’s 48 points.
Warriors Record After the Game
Following the December 15 result, Golden State’s overall record was 13-14.
The Warriors were 6-10 on the road.
Portland moved to 10-16 overall and 4-6 at home.
These records provide useful context but should not be used to diminish the quality of the individual performances.
The game itself was extremely competitive offensively.
- Both teams scored more than 130 points.
- Both shot 51% from the field.
- Both made at least 20 three-pointers.
The difference came down to several smaller advantages accumulating in Portland’s favor.
What the Box Score Teaches About Player Stats
Player statistics become most useful when they are interpreted together rather than viewed individually.
For example, Curry’s 48 points immediately stand out.
But once the rest of the box score is considered, a clearer story emerges.
Curry was incredibly efficient.
Grant and Sharpe were also highly efficient.
Avdija contributed scoring, rebounding, and eight assists.
Clingan controlled the defensive glass and protected the rim.
Williams III gave Portland a double-double from the bench.
Green contributed across several categories but also had eight turnovers.
Podziemski provided efficient shooting and playmaking.
The game therefore demonstrates why box-score analysis should combine scoring, efficiency, possession control, and team context.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The most important conclusions from the game are straightforward.
Curry Was Exceptional
Curry scored 48 points while shooting 16-of-26 overall and 12-of-19 from three.
That was an elite individual offensive performance.
Portland Had More Scoring Balance
Grant and Sharpe each scored 35, while Avdija added 26.
Three players therefore combined for 96 points.
Portland Won the Glass
The Trail Blazers collected 43 rebounds compared with 36 for Golden State.
Free Throws Favored Portland
Portland made 26 free throws compared with 19 for Golden State.
The Fourth Quarter Decided It
Portland scored 40 points in the fourth quarter while Golden State scored 32.
Golden State Shot Well
The Warriors made 24 of 47 three-pointers and shot 51% overall.
That makes the five-point loss even more revealing because the defeat was not caused by poor shooting.
Supporting Production Was Critical
Several Warriors reached double figures, but Portland’s three leading scorers created a stronger top-end scoring advantage.
How to Read These Stats Without Overreacting
One common mistake in sports analysis is to identify the highest scorer and immediately declare that player the best performer.
This game demonstrates why that approach is incomplete.
Curry clearly had the biggest scoring night.
But Sharpe’s 35 points came with 12-of-18 shooting, five made threes, six free throws, four assists, and four steals.
Grant also scored 35 while shooting 12-of-22 and 7-of-13 from three.
Avdija added 26 points, seven rebounds, and eight assists.
Meanwhile, Clingan contributed 10 rebounds and three blocks despite scoring only three points.
Each player influenced the game differently.
The best statistical analysis therefore asks not only “Who scored the most?” but also “How did those points affect the game, and what else did the player contribute?”
Official Statistics and Reliable Box-Score Research
For readers who want to compare this game with other NBA matchups, the league’s official statistics database is a useful reference point. You can use the official NBA statistics platform to cross-check box scores, player totals, shooting splits, and team statistics.
When researching a game for fantasy analysis, historical comparison, or an article, it is good practice to compare the final box score with an authoritative source rather than relying on a social-media graphic or an unsourced statistic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Warriors vs Trail Blazers game?
Stephen Curry led all players with 48 points for Golden State. Portland had two 35-point scorers, Jerami Grant and Shaedon Sharpe.
What was the final score of Warriors vs Trail Blazers on December 15, 2025?
The Portland Trail Blazers defeated the Golden State Warriors 136-131 at Moda Center in Portland.
How many three-pointers did Stephen Curry make?
Curry made 12 three-pointers on 19 attempts.
Who were Portland’s leading scorers?
Jerami Grant and Shaedon Sharpe each scored 35 points. Deni Avdija followed with 26.
Which team won the rebounding battle?
Portland won the rebounding battle 43-36, giving the Trail Blazers a seven-rebound advantage.
What was the 2025 season series between Golden State and Portland?
Portland won all three meetings during the 2025 season, finishing the series with a 3-0 record against Golden State.
Conclusion
The December 15, 2025 matchup between Golden State and Portland was a strong example of how a team can win despite facing an extraordinary individual scoring performance.
Stephen Curry’s 48 points, including 12 three-pointers, were the defining individual statistic for Golden State. The Warriors also shot 51% from the field and made 24 three-pointers.
Portland, however, produced the broader statistical advantage.
Jerami Grant and Shaedon Sharpe each scored 35 points. Deni Avdija added 26 points with seven rebounds and eight assists. Robert Williams III delivered a double-double off the bench, while Donovan Clingan supplied 10 rebounds and three blocks.
The Trail Blazers also controlled the rebounding battle 43-36, made seven more free throws, committed one fewer turnover, and outscored Golden State 40-32 in the fourth quarter.
Those smaller advantages ultimately outweighed Curry’s enormous scoring night.
The final result was Portland 136, Golden State 131, and the Trail Blazers completed a 3-0 season sweep. The box score shows that the game was not decided by one simple statistic. It was decided by Portland’s combination of efficient scoring, rebounding, free-throw execution, defensive contributions, and late-game production.
For anyone studying golden state warriors vs portland trail blazers match player stats, this matchup is a useful reminder that individual brilliance and team success are related but not identical. Curry produced the game’s most spectacular offensive performance, but Portland had enough high-level contributors across the lineup to control the decisive moments.
