Dallas Mavericks vs Celtics Match Player Stats

The dallas mavericks vs celtics match player stats from February 4, 2026, tell a much deeper story than the final 110-100 score suggests. Boston Celtics defeated the Dallas Mavericks at American Airlines Center in Dallas, with Jaylen Brown leading Boston with 33 points while Cooper Flagg produced an outstanding 36-point performance for Dallas. The game also featured strong rebounding from both teams, contrasting shooting profiles, and a fourth-quarter push that allowed Dallas to reduce the deficit without completely overturning Boston’s advantage.

For readers researching this matchup, the most useful way to understand the box score is to look beyond points. Field-goal efficiency, three-point shooting, rebounding, assists, turnovers, free throws, minutes, and plus/minus numbers all help explain how the game developed. This article breaks down those details using the supplied official game data and focuses on what the individual numbers reveal about the contest.

Dallas Mavericks vs Celtics Match Player Stats

The game took place on February 4, 2026, at American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas, in front of 19,132 spectators. Boston entered the game with a 32-18 record and a 16-10 road record, while Dallas entered at 19-31 with a 14-15 home record.

Boston won 110-100.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring shows that the Celtics established control early:

Quarter	Boston Celtics	Dallas Mavericks
1st	32	29
2nd	20	15
3rd	34	23
4th	24	33
Final	110	100

The second quarter was especially important. Boston added 20 points while Dallas managed only 15, giving the Celtics a seven-point halftime advantage after Boston had already won the opening period 32-29.

The third quarter created the biggest separation. Boston scored 34 points compared with Dallas’ 23, turning a relatively competitive first half into a much more difficult situation for the Mavericks.

Dallas responded in the fourth quarter by outscoring Boston 33-24. That late surge demonstrated that the Mavericks could generate offense under pressure, but the deficit created earlier in the game was too large to eliminate.

Game Overview and Team Statistics

The overall team numbers provide an important explanation for the final result.

Team Statistic	Boston Celtics	Dallas Mavericks
Field Goals	47-96	37-89
Field-Goal Percentage	49%	42%
Three-Pointers	13-39	9-32
Three-Point Percentage	33%	28%
Free Throws	3-5	17-22
Free-Throw Percentage	60%	77%
Rebounds	47	49
Assists	27	21
Turnovers	9	9
Steals	7	4
Blocks	4	4

One of the clearest statistical differences was shooting efficiency.

Boston made 47 of 96 field-goal attempts, producing a listed field-goal percentage of 49%. Dallas made 37 of 89 attempts, resulting in a listed 42% field-goal percentage.

That seven-percentage-point gap is significant over a full NBA game.

Boston also held an advantage from three-point range. The Celtics converted 13 of 39 attempts, while Dallas made 9 of 32. Neither team shot exceptionally well from beyond the arc, but Boston’s additional makes helped create separation.

Interestingly, Dallas had the stronger free-throw numbers. The Mavericks went 17-for-22 from the line, compared with Boston’s 3-for-5. That gave Dallas 14 more made free throws, yet the Mavericks still lost by 10 points.

This illustrates why looking at one category in isolation can be misleading. Dallas benefited heavily from free throws, but Boston’s superior field-goal production and overall offensive efficiency outweighed that advantage.

Boston Celtics Player Performance

Boston’s offense was led by Jaylen Brown, who delivered the team’s most productive individual performance.

Jaylen Brown

Jaylen Brown finished with:

• 33 points
• 15-of-29 field goals
• 2-of-5 three-pointers
• 1-of-2 free throws
• 11 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 3 turnovers
• 1 steal
• 1 offensive rebound
• 10 defensive rebounds
• 4 personal fouls
• 37 minutes

Brown was the Celtics’ leading scorer and leading rebounder.

His 15 made field goals were particularly important because Boston relied more heavily on successful shots from the field than Dallas did. Brown attempted 29 field goals, making him one of the central engines of Boston’s offensive production.

The 11 rebounds also show that his contribution extended beyond scoring. Ten of those rebounds came on the defensive glass, while one came offensively.

His three assists indicate that he was not simply finishing possessions himself. He also contributed to Boston’s ball movement.

Payton Pritchard

Payton Pritchard provided another major offensive contribution.

His line included:

• 26 points
• 12-of-20 field goals
• 2-of-8 three-pointers
• 4 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 2 turnovers
• 4 defensive rebounds
• 35 minutes

Pritchard’s 12 made field goals on 20 attempts made him one of Boston’s most efficient scorers in the game.

His seven assists were also important. While Derrick White led Boston with eight assists, Pritchard was close behind and combined his playmaking with 26 points.

The combination of scoring and passing made Pritchard’s performance particularly valuable. He did not need to rely exclusively on three-point shooting to create offense because he converted 12 field goals overall.

Derrick White

Derrick White played 38 minutes, the most among the listed Boston players.

His statistics were:

• 11 points
• 4-of-13 field goals
• 1-of-8 three-pointers
• 2-of-2 free throws
• 2 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 3 turnovers
• 2 offensive rebounds

White’s scoring efficiency was not his primary contribution in this game.

His eight assists were the highest total on Boston, and his 38 minutes indicate how heavily the Celtics relied on him.

His three-point shooting was difficult, however. White attempted eight three-pointers and made only one. That meant much of his value came through distribution and other aspects of his overall game rather than perimeter scoring.

Sam Hauser

Sam Hauser finished with 11 points in 26 minutes.

He shot 4-of-8 from the field and 3-of-7 from three-point range. He also recorded five rebounds, one steal, and one block.

His three-point shooting was especially useful because he converted three of Boston’s 13 made threes.

Hauser also recorded a +6 plus/minus figure, showing that Boston outscored Dallas during his minutes on the floor.

Neemias Queta

Neemias Queta produced a productive interior performance.

He finished with:

• 8 points
• 4-of-6 field goals
• 8 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 turnover
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• 8 defensive rebounds
• 4 personal fouls
• +10 plus/minus

Queta’s 8 rebounds came entirely on the defensive side according to the supplied statistics.

His 4-of-6 shooting also helped Boston maintain strong overall field-goal efficiency.

Baylor Scheierman

Baylor Scheierman scored only three points, but his box score contained several useful contributions.

He recorded:

• 3 points
• 1-of-5 field goals
• 1-of-3 three-pointers
• 7 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• 1 offensive rebound
• 6 defensive rebounds
• +16 plus/minus

The +16 was the highest listed plus/minus figure among Boston players.

That does not mean the statistic alone explains his complete impact, but it provides useful context. His seven rebounds, three assists, steal, and block show that his contribution was broader than his three points suggest.

Boston Bench Production

The Celtics also received meaningful scoring from their reserves.

Luka Garza scored 16 points in only 20 minutes. He shot 6-of-8 from the field and an excellent 4-of-4 from three-point range.

That was one of the most efficient individual shooting performances in the game.

Garza also collected four rebounds, one assist, two steals, one block, and four offensive rebounds.

His four made three-pointers were especially notable because Boston made 13 threes as a team.

Other Boston reserve contributions included:

• Jordan Walsh: 0 points in 11 minutes
• Hugo Gonzalez: 2 points and 6 rebounds in 17 minutes
• Luka Garza: 16 points and 4-of-4 three-point shooting
• Payton Pritchard: 26 points and 7 assists

The Celtics therefore did not depend on only one scorer. Brown led the team, but Pritchard and Garza provided substantial additional scoring.

Dallas Mavericks Player Performance

Dallas had one of the game’s most impressive individual scoring performances despite losing.

Cooper Flagg finished with 36 points and was the Mavericks’ clear offensive leader.

Cooper Flagg

Flagg’s statistics were:

• 36 points
• 12-of-24 field goals
• 2-of-4 three-pointers
• 10-of-11 free throws
• 9 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 1 turnover
• 2 blocks
• 1 offensive rebound
• 8 defensive rebounds
• 1 personal foul
• -2 plus/minus
• 37 minutes

Flagg led Dallas in points and assists and was second on the team in the supplied statistics for total rebounds, behind Daniel Gafford.

His 36 points came from a balanced offensive profile.

He made 12 field goals, two three-pointers, and 10 free throws.

The free-throw shooting was especially strong. Flagg converted 10 of 11 attempts, giving Dallas an important source of efficient scoring.

His six assists also demonstrate that he contributed as a creator rather than functioning only as a scorer.

The nine rebounds gave him an almost complete statistical line, while his two blocks added defensive value.

Despite the strong individual production, Dallas still finished 10 points behind Boston.

That contrast is one of the most interesting aspects of the game.

Daniel Gafford

Daniel Gafford was Dallas’ leading rebounder.

He recorded:

• 10 points
• 4-of-5 field goals
• 2-of-4 free throws
• 12 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 2 turnovers
• 1 steal
• 2 blocks
• 4 offensive rebounds
• 8 defensive rebounds
• 1 personal foul
• -11 plus/minus
• 25 minutes

Gafford’s 12 rebounds were the highest total for either team.

His four offensive rebounds were particularly valuable because they created additional possessions for Dallas.

He also shot 4-of-5 from the field, showing strong efficiency around the basket.

Caleb Martin

Caleb Martin scored 13 points in 29 minutes.

His line included:

• 13 points
• 5-of-10 field goals
• 1-of-2 three-pointers
• 2-of-4 free throws
• 5 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 5 defensive rebounds
• 2 personal fouls
• -5 plus/minus

Martin was one of Dallas’ more efficient scorers among the starters, making half of his field-goal attempts.

His five rebounds and three assists also added value beyond scoring.

Naji Marshall

Naji Marshall played 31 minutes and contributed:

• 9 points
• 4-of-15 field goals
• 1-of-5 three-pointers
• 8 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 turnover
• 2 offensive rebounds
• 6 defensive rebounds
• -13 plus/minus

Marshall’s eight rebounds were important, but his shooting efficiency was a challenge.

He made only four of 15 field-goal attempts and one of five three-point attempts.

The -13 plus/minus was also one of the lower figures among Dallas players.

Max Christie

Max Christie finished with:

• 10 points
• 4-of-13 field goals
• 2-of-9 three-pointers
• 2 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 steal
• 2 defensive rebounds
• -1 plus/minus
• 30 minutes

Christie’s three-point shooting produced two of Dallas’ nine made threes, although he needed nine attempts to get there.

His three assists provided additional playmaking support.

Dallas Bench Performance

Dallas received several contributions from its reserves, although none matched Flagg’s scoring output.

Klay Thompson scored four points in 20 minutes, shooting 1-of-5 from the field and 1-of-4 from three-point range.

Jaden Hardy scored seven points in 18 minutes while shooting 2-of-4 from the field, 1-of-3 from three-point range, and 2-of-2 from the free-throw line.

Dwight Powell scored four points in 11 minutes and added two rebounds and one steal.

Moussa Cisse also scored four points, collecting five rebounds in 15 minutes.

Ryan Nembhard recorded three points and three assists.

Miles Kelly did not score, going 0-of-2 from the field and 0-of-2 from three-point range, but he contributed three rebounds and one assist.

Brandon Williams did not play because of a right lower-leg contusion.

Shooting Efficiency Explains Much of the Difference

One of the clearest lessons from this matchup is the importance of looking at efficiency rather than simply counting attempts.

Boston attempted 96 field goals and made 47.

Dallas attempted 89 and made 37.

That difference of seven made field goals translated into 14 additional points from made field goals before considering other scoring categories.

Boston also made four more three-pointers.

Dallas made more free throws, but the Celtics’ advantage in made field goals and three-pointers helped compensate for Dallas’ free-throw edge.

This is why the final score cannot be fully understood by simply looking at the leading scorer.

Cooper Flagg scored 36 points, three more than Jaylen Brown. Yet Boston won by 10.

The broader team numbers explain why.

Rebounding Battle

Dallas actually won the total rebounding battle.

The Mavericks recorded 49 rebounds compared with Boston’s 47.

Daniel Gafford led all players with 12 rebounds, while Brown led Boston with 11.

Dallas also received strong rebounding contributions from Naji Marshall, who had eight, and Cooper Flagg, who had nine.

Boston received eight from Queta and seven from Scheierman.

This means Boston did not win because it dominated the glass.

Instead, the Celtics found an advantage through shooting and ball movement.

Ball Movement and Turnovers

Boston recorded 27 assists compared with Dallas’ 21.

That six-assist advantage is meaningful because it suggests Boston created more scoring opportunities through passing.

Derrick White led the Celtics with eight assists, while Payton Pritchard added seven.

For Dallas, Flagg led with six assists, followed by Caleb Martin and Naji Marshall with three each.

Both teams committed only nine turnovers.

That is another important detail.

Boston did not win because Dallas repeatedly gave the ball away. Both teams protected possession at the same basic level according to the supplied box score.

The difference came more from what each team did with its possessions.

Fourth-Quarter Comeback Attempt

The fourth quarter deserves special attention.

Dallas scored 33 points in the final period, while Boston scored 24.

That nine-point advantage reduced Boston’s margin, but the Celtics entered the final period with enough separation to protect the lead.

The fourth-quarter performance shows why game flow matters when analyzing player statistics.

A player can post excellent late-game numbers without having enough time to completely erase an earlier deficit.

For Dallas, the final period demonstrated offensive resilience.

For Boston, the key factor was the cushion created before the fourth quarter.

Plus/Minus Context

Plus/minus statistics can be useful, but they should not be treated as a standalone player rating.

Among Boston players, Baylor Scheierman recorded the highest listed plus/minus at +16.

Neemias Queta was +10, while Sam Hauser was +6.

On Dallas, Dwight Powell and Moussa Cisse were both +3, while Jaden Hardy recorded +4.

At the same time, several players with strong individual scoring numbers had negative plus/minus figures.

Cooper Flagg scored 36 points but finished at -2.

Jaylen Brown scored 33 points and finished at -1.

This illustrates why individual box-score production and team performance should be examined together.

The Most Important Statistical Takeaways

Several themes stand out from the complete box score.

1. Boston’s field-goal efficiency mattered

Boston shot 49% from the field compared with Dallas at 42%.

That was one of the biggest statistical differences in the game.

2. Dallas won the free-throw battle

The Mavericks made 17 free throws compared with Boston’s three.

Dallas therefore gained a significant scoring advantage at the line.

3. Cooper Flagg was Dallas’ offensive centerpiece

Flagg scored 36 points, collected nine rebounds, and recorded six assists.

His offensive production was one of the defining features of the matchup.

4. Jaylen Brown combined scoring and rebounding

Brown’s 33 points and 11 rebounds gave Boston production in two major statistical categories.

5. Boston moved the ball more effectively

The Celtics recorded 27 assists, six more than Dallas.

6. Turnovers were even

Both teams finished with nine turnovers.

This means turnover differential did not determine the result.

7. Dallas won the total rebounding battle

The Mavericks finished with 49 rebounds to Boston’s 47.

Again, this demonstrates that the Celtics’ victory came despite Dallas holding advantages in certain categories.

What the Player Stats Reveal About the Match

The deeper value of this box score is that it prevents an overly simple interpretation of the result.

A casual reading might focus on the 110-100 score and stop there.

A player-stat analysis reveals a more detailed picture.

Dallas had the game’s highest individual scorer in Cooper Flagg. The Mavericks also had the leading rebounder in Daniel Gafford and made substantially more free throws.

Yet Boston produced a higher field-goal percentage, made more three-pointers, recorded more assists, and ultimately scored 10 more points.

The Celtics’ offense was also distributed across multiple players.

Brown scored 33.

Pritchard scored 26.

Garza scored 16.

White and Hauser each scored 11.

That gave Boston several scoring sources rather than forcing one player to carry the entire offensive burden.

Dallas was more concentrated around Flagg’s production.

Flagg scored 36, while Martin was next with 13.

That difference in scoring distribution is an important part of understanding the matchup.

Starter Comparison

The starting groups also provide useful context.

Boston starters

• Sam Hauser
• Neemias Queta
• Derrick White
• Jaylen Brown
• Baylor Scheierman

Dallas starters

• Caleb Martin
• Daniel Gafford
• Naji Marshall
• Cooper Flagg
• Max Christie

Boston’s starters collectively provided a mixture of scoring, passing, rebounding, and defensive contributions.

Dallas’ starting group produced its highest individual scoring output through Flagg, while Gafford controlled the boards.

The contrast between the two groups becomes clearer when looking at their efficiency.

Brown shot 15-of-29.

Pritchard, although listed among Boston’s bench players, shot 12-of-20.

Gafford shot 4-of-5.

Martin shot 5-of-10.

Flagg shot 12-of-24.

At the same time, several Dallas players struggled from the field, including Marshall at 4-of-15 and Christie at 4-of-13.

Those lower-efficiency possessions contributed to the overall shooting gap.

Why Free Throws Did Not Decide the Game

Dallas made 17 free throws, while Boston made only three.

That is a substantial difference.

Normally, a 14-made-free-throw advantage can have a major influence on the final score.

However, Dallas’ advantage at the line was offset by Boston’s superior production from field goals.

Boston made 10 more field goals than Dallas, creating a 20-point difference in made two-point and three-point field goals before accounting for the value of three-pointers separately.

Boston also made four more three-pointers.

This is a strong example of why statistical analysis should consider several categories together.

A Closer Look at the Three-Point Numbers

Three-point shooting was another meaningful difference.

Boston:

• 13 made
• 39 attempts
• 33%

Dallas:

• 9 made
• 32 attempts
• 28%

Boston therefore made four more three-pointers.

Luka Garza was perfect from three-point range, going 4-for-4.

Sam Hauser also made three threes.

Jaylen Brown added two.

Dallas’ Cooper Flagg made two three-pointers, while Max Christie and Caleb Martin each made two and Naji Marshall made one.

The Mavericks therefore received some perimeter production, but Boston produced more successful attempts overall.

How to Read These Stats Without Overlooking Context

Player statistics are most useful when placed in context.

Points tell you who scored.

Field-goal attempts show who carried offensive responsibility.

Shooting percentages provide information about efficiency.

Assists indicate playmaking.

Rebounds reveal work on the glass.

Steals and blocks highlight certain defensive events.

Plus/minus gives information about team scoring margin during a player’s minutes.

None of these categories tells the complete story by itself.

For example, Brown’s 33 points are impressive, but his 11 rebounds add another dimension.

Flagg’s 36 points stand out, but his nine rebounds and six assists make the performance more complete.

White’s 11 points may look modest compared with Brown or Flagg, but his eight assists were the highest total for Boston.

Scheierman’s three points appear limited, but he collected seven rebounds, three assists, one steal, and one block while posting a +16 plus/minus.

That is why a complete box-score analysis should not focus exclusively on scoring.

Dallas Mavericks vs Celtics Match Player Stats: Quick Reference

For readers looking for the most important numbers quickly, the following summary captures the major individual performances.

Player	Team	PTS	REB	AST	FG
Cooper Flagg	Dallas	36	9	6	12-24
Jaylen Brown	Boston	33	11	3	15-29
Payton Pritchard	Boston	26	4	7	12-20
Luka Garza	Boston	16	4	1	6-8
Caleb Martin	Dallas	13	5	3	5-10
Derrick White	Boston	11	2	8	4-13
Sam Hauser	Boston	11	5	0 listed	4-8
Max Christie	Dallas	10	2	3	4-13
Daniel Gafford	Dallas	10	12	1	4-5
Naji Marshall	Dallas	9	8	3	4-15

This table makes one point especially clear: the game featured excellent individual performances on both sides, but Boston received more balanced production from its major contributors.

Matchup Record and Next Meeting

The supplied matchup data lists Boston as leading the season series 1-0 after the February 4 game.

The previous meeting was:

Boston Celtics 110, Dallas Mavericks 100 on February 4, 2026.

The next listed meeting was:

Dallas Mavericks 100, Boston Celtics 120 on March 7, 2026.

For historical or statistical research, it is useful to keep each meeting separate rather than combining numbers from different games. Individual performances can change significantly from one matchup to another because of minutes, shooting variance, lineup changes, injuries, and game situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the highest scorer in the Dallas Mavericks vs Celtics game?

Cooper Flagg was the highest scorer for either team, finishing with 36 points for Dallas. Jaylen Brown led Boston with 33 points.

What was the final score between Boston and Dallas?

Boston Celtics defeated Dallas Mavericks 110-100 on February 4, 2026, at American Airlines Center.

Who led the Mavericks in rebounds?

Daniel Gafford led Dallas with 12 rebounds. He also recorded four offensive rebounds and eight defensive rebounds.

Who led the Celtics in assists?

Derrick White led Boston with eight assists. Payton Pritchard was second with seven assists.

Which team shot better from the field?

Boston shot 49% from the field, while Dallas shot 42% according to the supplied game statistics.

Did Dallas have any statistical advantages?

Yes. Dallas finished with 49 rebounds compared with Boston’s 47 and made 17 free throws compared with Boston’s three. The Mavericks also had the game’s leading scorer in Cooper Flagg.

Conclusion

The dallas mavericks vs celtics match player stats from February 4, 2026, provide a detailed example of how an NBA game can be decided by several factors rather than one headline statistic.

Boston finished with 110 points and Dallas finished with 100. Jaylen Brown led the Celtics with 33 points and 11 rebounds, while Cooper Flagg produced 36 points, nine rebounds, and six assists for Dallas.

The Celtics’ statistical advantages came primarily through field-goal efficiency, three-point production, and assists. Boston shot 49% from the field compared with Dallas at 42%, made 13 three-pointers compared with nine, and recorded 27 assists compared with 21.

Dallas had clear advantages as well. The Mavericks won the rebounding battle 49-47 and made 17 free throws compared with Boston’s three. Gafford led all players with 12 rebounds, while Flagg carried a major portion of Dallas’ offensive workload.

The fourth quarter also showed Dallas’ ability to respond. The Mavericks scored 33 points in the final period compared with Boston’s 24, but the Celtics had already established enough separation during the first three quarters to secure the 110-100 victory.

Ultimately, the complete box score is more informative than the final score alone. It shows Boston’s balanced scoring, Dallas’ reliance on Flagg’s production, the importance of shooting efficiency, and the different ways individual players contributed to the contest.