Washington Wizards vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats

The washington wizards vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from October 23, 2025, tell the story of a high-scoring game controlled by Milwaukee from the opening quarter. The Bucks defeated the Wizards 133-120 at Fiserv Forum, using a 40-point first quarter to establish an early advantage. Giannis Antetokounmpo led all players with 37 points and added 14 rebounds and 5 assists.

The game also featured strong individual performances from both teams. Milwaukee received efficient scoring from several players, while Washington had major contributions from Khris Middleton and Kyshawn George. The Wizards also won the overall rebounding battle, but Milwaukee produced more assists, fewer turnovers, and better free-throw shooting.

This breakdown examines the complete player statistics, team numbers, quarter-by-quarter scoring, shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, and the key statistical reasons behind Milwaukee’s 133-120 victory.

Game Overview

The matchup took place on October 23, 2025, at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The announced attendance was 17,341.

Milwaukee finished the game with a 133-120 victory, giving the Bucks a 1-0 record in the supplied game data. Washington dropped to 0-1.

Category	Washington Wizards	Milwaukee Bucks
Final Score	120	133
Q1	23	40
Q2	30	32
Q3	37	29
Q4	30	32
Field Goals	46-98	50-98
Field Goal %	47%	51%
Three-Pointers	17-42	18-44
Three-Point %	40%	41%
Free Throws	11-19	15-19
Free Throw %	58%	79%
Rebounds	56	46
Assists	23	31
Turnovers	13	8
Steals	5	8
Blocks	4	6
Offensive Rebounds	13	6
Defensive Rebounds	43	40
Fouls	19	22
Bench Points	46	47

The most important feature of the box score is that Milwaukee won despite being outrebounded by Washington.

That matters because it shows the result was not simply based on second-chance opportunities. Milwaukee created advantages through shooting, passing, ball security, and efficient free-throw conversion.

The NBA’s official statistical glossary defines field goal percentage as made field goals divided by field goal attempts, while assists are credited for passes that directly lead to made baskets. NBA Stats Glossary

Washington Wizards vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats

The washington wizards vs milwaukee bucks match player stats show a game where Milwaukee’s top-end production was led by Giannis Antetokounmpo, while Washington relied on a broader scoring group.

Giannis was the standout performer with 37 points, 14 rebounds, and 5 assists. He shot 16-of-26 from the field, making him one of the most efficient high-volume scorers in the game.

For Washington, Khris Middleton scored 23 points, while Kyshawn George contributed 21 points and 9 rebounds. Alex Sarr added 10 points and 11 rebounds to record a double-double.

Giannis Antetokounmpo Leads Milwaukee

Giannis Antetokounmpo produced the most complete individual performance in the game.

His final line was:

• 37 points
• 14 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 16-of-26 field goals
• 1-of-3 from three-point range
• 4-of-7 free throws

His 16 made field goals were the most by any player in the supplied statistics.

The 37-point total also represented more than a quarter of Milwaukee’s 133 points. He combined scoring volume with rebounding and playmaking, giving Milwaukee production across several areas of the box score.

His shooting efficiency was especially important. Giannis attempted 26 field goals and made 16, producing a field goal percentage of approximately 61.5%.

That efficiency allowed Milwaukee to generate consistent offense without depending entirely on outside shooting.

Khris Middleton Provides Washington’s Scoring

Khris Middleton was Washington’s leading scorer with 23 points.

His statistics included:

• 23 points
• 6 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 9-of-14 field goals
• 3-of-5 three-pointers
• 2-of-3 free throws

Middleton shot approximately 64.3% from the field based on the supplied 9-of-14 line.

His three-point shooting was also effective. He made 3 of 5 attempts from beyond the arc, giving Washington an important perimeter scoring source.

Middleton’s 23 points represented the highest individual scoring total for Washington in the game.

Kyshawn George Has an All-Around Game

Kyshawn George finished with 21 points, 9 rebounds, and 4 assists.

His shooting line was:

• 21 points
• 9 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 7-of-15 field goals
• 3-of-6 three-pointers
• 4-of-8 free throws

George’s contribution was significant because he affected the game beyond scoring.

His 9 rebounds were only two short of a double-double, while his 4 assists were the most on Washington according to the supplied player data.

His three-point shooting also helped Washington maintain offensive pressure after Milwaukee built its early lead.

Alex Sarr Controls the Glass

Alex Sarr recorded 10 points and 11 rebounds.

He shot 5-of-10 from the field and added 3 assists.

The 11 rebounds made him Washington’s leading rebounder. His performance was particularly relevant because Washington finished with 56 total rebounds, 10 more than Milwaukee.

Sarr’s rebounding contribution helped Washington create extra possessions, especially through the team’s 13 offensive rebounds.

Kyle Kuzma Adds Efficient Scoring

Kyle Kuzma scored 12 points on 5-of-10 shooting.

He also contributed:

• 4 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2-of-2 free throws

His perfect free-throw shooting was useful, although Washington as a team converted only 11 of 19 attempts.

Bub Carrington Provides Perimeter Shooting

Bub Carrington scored 11 points.

He shot 4-of-9 from the field and 3-of-4 from three-point range. He also collected 5 rebounds and recorded 2 assists.

His three-point percentage was 75% based on the supplied shooting line, making him one of Washington’s most accurate perimeter shooters in the game.

CJ McCollum Contributes Across the Box Score

CJ McCollum finished with:

• 9 points
• 6 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 4-of-14 field goals

His scoring efficiency was lower than several other Washington players, but his 6 rebounds and 3 assists added value in other areas.

Washington’s Bench Production

The Wizards received 46 points from their bench.

That figure was almost identical to Milwaukee’s 47 bench points.

This is an important detail because it shows that bench scoring was not the major separator. Both teams received substantial production from their reserves.

The difference came more from the starting groups and the way Milwaukee managed possessions.

Milwaukee Bucks Player Statistics

Milwaukee’s individual statistics show a balanced supporting cast around Giannis.

Gary Trent Jr. scored 17 points, while Myles Turner finished with 11 points, 8 rebounds, 5 assists, and 3 blocks.

AJ Green and Taurean Prince each scored 11 points, while Kevin Porter Jr. added 10.

Gary Trent Jr. Provides Three-Point Production

Gary Trent Jr. scored 17 points on 6-of-12 shooting.

His three-point line was especially important:

• 5-of-11 from three
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists

He converted 45.5% of his three-point attempts based on the supplied numbers.

That perimeter efficiency complemented Giannis’ interior scoring and forced Washington to defend multiple areas of the floor.

Myles Turner Impacts Both Ends

Myles Turner recorded 11 points, 8 rebounds, 5 assists, and 3 blocks.

His shooting line was:

• 4-of-12 field goals
• 2-of-8 three-pointers
• 1-of-2 free throws

His scoring efficiency was modest, but his defensive contribution stood out.

Three blocks gave Milwaukee a major rim-protection presence. His 5 assists also matched Giannis’ assist total.

Turner’s line demonstrates why a player’s value cannot always be judged through points alone.

Kevin Porter Jr. Shoots Efficiently

Kevin Porter Jr. scored 10 points on 3-of-5 shooting.

He made 2 of 3 three-point attempts and converted both of his free throws.

That combination gave him an efficient scoring night despite a relatively small scoring total.

AJ Green and Taurean Prince Stretch the Floor

AJ Green scored 11 points on 4-of-6 shooting and made 3-of-5 three-pointers.

Taurean Prince also scored 11 points, going 4-of-5 from the field and 3-of-4 from three.

Both players therefore supplied efficient perimeter scoring.

Their shooting helped Milwaukee finish 18-of-44 from three-point range, slightly better than Washington’s 17-of-42.

Cole Anthony Adds Playmaking

Cole Anthony scored 9 points and recorded 5 assists.

He shot 4-of-5 from the field and 1-of-2 from three.

His 5 assists tied Giannis for Milwaukee’s team-high.

That shared playmaking responsibility was one reason Milwaukee finished with 31 assists, eight more than Washington.

Ryan Rollins Has a Mixed Shooting Night

Ryan Rollins finished with 9 points, 4 rebounds, and 3 assists.

He shot 2-of-9 from the field and 1-of-6 from three, but he made all 4 of his free throws.

His shooting percentage was therefore below several of Milwaukee’s other contributors, but his free-throw conversion helped his final scoring total.

Bobby Portis Adds Rebounding

Bobby Portis recorded 2 points and 6 rebounds.

Although his scoring output was limited, his rebounding contribution helped Milwaukee maintain a physical presence inside.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The game was largely shaped by Milwaukee’s first-quarter explosion.

First Quarter: Bucks 40, Wizards 23

Milwaukee opened the game with 40 points.

Washington scored 23.

The 17-point first-quarter difference immediately created a difficult situation for the Wizards.

Washington eventually recovered in later periods, but the opening deficit remained significant throughout the game.

Second Quarter: Bucks 32, Wizards 30

Washington improved offensively in the second quarter, scoring 30 points.

Milwaukee still won the period 32-30.

The Bucks therefore entered halftime with a substantial advantage created mainly by the first quarter.

Third Quarter: Wizards 37, Bucks 29

The third quarter was Washington’s strongest scoring period.

The Wizards scored 37 points while holding Milwaukee to 29.

That eight-point swing reduced the deficit and gave Washington momentum heading into the final quarter.

This was the clearest example of Washington’s ability to respond after the slow start.

Fourth Quarter: Bucks 32, Wizards 30

Milwaukee regained control in the final quarter.

The Bucks scored 32 points compared with Washington’s 30.

The Wizards needed another major scoring run to complete the comeback, but Milwaukee’s offense remained productive enough to protect the lead.

Shooting Efficiency Comparison

Shooting was one of the clearest statistical differences between the teams.

Washington made 46 of 98 field-goal attempts, producing a listed 47% field-goal rate.

Milwaukee made 50 of 98 attempts, producing a listed 51% rate.

Because both teams attempted exactly 98 field goals, the comparison is straightforward.

Milwaukee made four more shots from the field.

That four-field-goal advantage translated into eight additional points before accounting for three-pointers and free throws.

Three-Point Shooting

Washington went 17-of-42 from three.

Milwaukee went 18-of-44.

The difference was only one made three-pointer.

Washington’s three-point percentage was listed at 40%, while Milwaukee’s was 41%.

Therefore, three-point shooting alone does not explain the 13-point final margin.

The bigger difference was Milwaukee’s overall field-goal efficiency and free-throw conversion.

Free-Throw Shooting

Washington made 11 of 19 free throws.

Milwaukee made 15 of 19.

That meant Milwaukee scored four more points at the free-throw line despite both teams attempting the same number of shots.

Washington’s 58% free-throw rate was substantially below Milwaukee’s 79%.

In a 13-point game, those extra free throws were meaningful.

Rebounding Battle

Washington won the rebounding battle 56-46.

That was a 10-rebound advantage for the Wizards.

Washington also collected 13 offensive rebounds compared with Milwaukee’s 6.

This means the Wizards created seven more offensive-rebound opportunities in the supplied box score.

Yet Milwaukee still won comfortably.

That is one of the most interesting statistical lessons from the matchup.

Rebounding can create additional possessions, but those possessions must be converted efficiently. Milwaukee offset Washington’s rebounding advantage through superior shooting, passing, free throws, and ball security.

Alex Sarr Leads Washington’s Rebounding

Sarr’s 11 rebounds were the most for Washington.

He helped Washington maintain its overall advantage on the glass.

Middleton added 6 rebounds, while McCollum had 6 and George had 9.

Giannis Controls Milwaukee’s Glass

Giannis recorded 14 rebounds.

That was the highest individual total in the game.

His rebounding was particularly valuable because Milwaukee did not win the overall team rebounding battle.

His individual work helped limit the impact of Washington’s offensive-rebounding advantage.

Passing and Ball Movement

The passing numbers strongly favored Milwaukee.

The Bucks recorded 31 assists.

Washington recorded 23.

That eight-assist advantage indicates a greater share of Milwaukee’s offense came through successful teammate creation.

Giannis and Cole Anthony each had 5 assists.

Turner’s 5 assists also gave Milwaukee another strong playmaking contributor.

Washington’s leading assist total was George’s 4.

Kuzma and McCollum each added 3.

Why the Assist Gap Matters

A team can score efficiently through individual shot-making, but a higher assist total can indicate more coordinated offensive production.

Milwaukee’s 31 assists came alongside 50 made field goals.

That means a large portion of the Bucks’ successful shooting involved teammate creation.

The combination of Giannis’ interior pressure and Milwaukee’s perimeter shooting created a difficult defensive problem for Washington.

Turnovers and Possession Control

Milwaukee committed only 8 turnovers.

Washington committed 13.

The five-turnover difference is important because turnovers can remove scoring opportunities while giving the opponent transition chances.

Milwaukee’s 31 assists and 8 turnovers produced a strong team assist-to-turnover relationship.

Washington’s 23 assists against 13 turnovers were less efficient by comparison.

This was another area where Milwaukee gained value without needing more rebounds.

Defensive Statistics

Milwaukee recorded:

• 8 steals
• 6 blocks
• 22 fouls

Washington recorded:

• 5 steals
• 4 blocks
• 19 fouls

The Bucks therefore produced three more steals and two more blocks.

The additional defensive events helped Milwaukee disrupt Washington’s offense.

Myles Turner Leads in Blocks

Turner recorded 3 blocks, the most from either team according to the supplied individual statistics.

His defensive presence added another layer to Milwaukee’s interior defense.

Milwaukee Creates More Defensive Events

The combination of 8 steals and 6 blocks gave Milwaukee 14 recorded steals and blocks.

Washington had 9.

That five-event difference reflects Milwaukee’s stronger defensive activity in the box score.

Team Statistical Advantages That Decided the Game

The washington wizards vs milwaukee bucks match player stats reveal several categories that explain the final result.

1. Milwaukee Started Faster

The 40-23 opening quarter created a 17-point advantage.

That early lead provided a cushion that Washington could not fully erase.

2. Milwaukee Shot Better Overall

The Bucks made 50 of 98 field goals.

The Wizards made 46 of 98.

Milwaukee therefore had four additional field goals on the same number of attempts.

3. Milwaukee Made More Free Throws

The Bucks made 15 of 19.

Washington made 11 of 19.

The four-point free-throw advantage added directly to the final margin.

4. Milwaukee Protected the Ball Better

The Bucks committed 8 turnovers.

Washington committed 13.

Five additional possessions were therefore lost by Washington through turnovers.

5. Milwaukee Shared the Ball More

The Bucks recorded 31 assists.

Washington had 23.

That eight-assist advantage was one of the clearest differences in offensive organization.

6. Washington Won the Rebounding Battle

This was a major positive for the Wizards.

They grabbed 56 rebounds compared with Milwaukee’s 46.

However, that advantage did not overcome Milwaukee’s efficiency in other areas.

What the Player Stats Tell Us

Raw scoring totals are useful, but the complete box score provides a deeper picture.

Giannis’ 37-point performance was the headline statistic, but his 14 rebounds and 5 assists made his contribution much broader.

Middleton’s 23 points were supported by efficient shooting.

George combined 21 points with 9 rebounds and 4 assists.

Sarr’s 11 rebounds helped Washington dominate the glass.

For Milwaukee, Turner contributed defense and passing despite scoring only 11 points.

Trent Jr., Green, and Prince provided perimeter shooting that complemented Giannis.

This balance prevented Washington from focusing exclusively on one scoring source.

Comparing the Leading Players

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG
Giannis Antetokounmpo	37	14	5	16-26
Khris Middleton	23	6	3	9-14
Kyshawn George	21	9	4	7-15
Gary Trent Jr.	17	4	2	6-12
Myles Turner	11	8	5	4-12
Alex Sarr	10	11	3	5-10
Kyle Kuzma	12	4	3	5-10
Cole Anthony	9	2	5	4-5

This comparison shows that Giannis led the game in scoring and rebounding while tying for Milwaukee’s assist lead.

George was Washington’s most complete perimeter contributor based on the supplied combination of scoring, rebounding, and assists.

Middleton was Washington’s most efficient high-volume scorer among the leading scorers listed.

A Closer Look at the 133-120 Final Score

The final score can look like a straightforward offensive shootout.

The quarter totals show something more specific.

Milwaukee won the first quarter by 17 points.

Washington won the third quarter by 8.

The remaining two quarters were close, with Milwaukee winning the second by 2 and the fourth by 2.

That means the game was effectively decided by Milwaukee’s first-quarter advantage.

Washington actually outscored Milwaukee 37-29 in the third quarter.

However, a strong third quarter could not fully compensate for the opening deficit.

This is an important lesson when evaluating box scores. A team’s overall performance can look competitive across three quarters while an extreme result in one period determines the final outcome.

Washington’s Biggest Statistical Strengths

Washington had several strong numbers despite the loss.

Rebounding

The Wizards collected 56 rebounds.

That was 10 more than Milwaukee.

Offensive Rebounding

Washington grabbed 13 offensive rebounds.

That was more than twice Milwaukee’s 6.

Three-Point Volume

Washington attempted 42 three-pointers.

That was only two fewer than Milwaukee’s 44.

Bench Scoring

Washington’s bench produced 46 points.

Milwaukee’s bench produced 47.

Therefore, Washington’s reserves were competitive in scoring.

Third-Quarter Offense

Washington scored 37 points in the third quarter.

That was its highest-scoring period of the game.

Milwaukee’s Biggest Statistical Strengths

Milwaukee’s advantages were concentrated in several high-value categories.

Overall Field-Goal Percentage

The Bucks shot 51% compared with Washington’s 47%.

Free-Throw Percentage

Milwaukee converted 79% of its free throws.

Washington converted 58%.

Assists

Milwaukee recorded 31 assists against Washington’s 23.

Turnovers

Milwaukee committed only 8 turnovers.

Washington committed 13.

Steals and Blocks

Milwaukee finished with 8 steals and 6 blocks.

Washington recorded 5 steals and 4 blocks.

These categories combined to give Milwaukee a more efficient overall statistical profile.

What to Look for When Reading Similar Match Stats

When reviewing a game like this, it is easy to focus only on the leading scorer.

A better approach is to examine several categories together.

First, compare field-goal attempts and makes.

Next, examine three-point shooting.

Then look at free throws, turnovers, assists, and offensive rebounds.

Finally, compare the quarter scores.

This approach helps identify whether a game was decided by shooting, possession control, rebounding, free throws, or a combination of factors.

For example, Washington won the rebounding battle but lost the game.

That immediately shows why no single box-score category should be considered in isolation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Wizards in scoring against the Bucks?

Khris Middleton led Washington with 23 points. He shot 9-of-14 from the field and made 3-of-5 three-point attempts.

Who was Milwaukee’s leading scorer?

Giannis Antetokounmpo led all scorers with 37 points. He also recorded 14 rebounds and 5 assists.

What was the final score between Washington and Milwaukee?

The Milwaukee Bucks defeated the Washington Wizards 133-120 on October 23, 2025, at Fiserv Forum.

Which team had more rebounds?

Washington had more rebounds. The Wizards finished with 56 rebounds, while Milwaukee recorded 46.

Which team had more assists?

Milwaukee had more assists. The Bucks recorded 31 assists compared with Washington’s 23.

How many three-pointers did each team make?

Washington made 17 three-pointers on 42 attempts. Milwaukee made 18 on 44 attempts.

Conclusion

The washington wizards vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from October 23, 2025, show how Milwaukee turned a dominant opening quarter into a 133-120 victory.

Giannis Antetokounmpo was the game’s leading performer with 37 points, 14 rebounds, and 5 assists. Khris Middleton led Washington with 23 points, while Kyshawn George added 21 points and 9 rebounds.

Washington controlled the rebounding battle and finished with 10 more total rebounds than Milwaukee. The Wizards also collected seven more offensive rebounds.

Milwaukee’s advantage came through other parts of the box score. The Bucks shot 51% from the field, made 15 of 19 free throws, recorded 31 assists, committed only 8 turnovers, and produced 14 combined steals and blocks.

The quarter breakdown provides the clearest explanation. Milwaukee scored 40 points in the opening period and built a 17-point advantage. Washington responded with a 37-point third quarter, but the Bucks remained productive in the fourth and closed out the game.

The statistics therefore show a matchup where rebounding favored Washington, while shooting efficiency, playmaking, ball security, and early scoring favored Milwaukee.