Lakers vs Orlando magic match player stats

The lakers vs orlando magic match player statsa from February 25, 2026, tell the story of one of the closest games of the season for both teams. The Orlando Magic defeated the Los Angeles Lakers 110-109 at crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, winning by a single point after four highly competitive quarters. Orlando entered the game with a 31-26 record and a 13-16 mark on the road, while the Lakers were 34-23 overall and 16-12 at home. The result gave Orlando a 1-0 lead in the season series.

The final score alone does not explain why Orlando won. The Magic combined strong interior production, efficient scoring from key players, 47 rebounds, and only 10 turnovers. Los Angeles shot a slightly better overall field-goal percentage, but the Lakers struggled more significantly from three-point range and gave the ball away 12 times. Those small differences mattered in a one-point game.

For anyone researching the lakers vs orlando magic match player statsa, the most important takeaway is that several individual performances were excellent without producing a comfortable victory. Paolo Banchero led Orlando with 25 points and 10 rebounds, while Desmond Bane added 22 points and six assists. Wendell Carter Jr. was highly efficient, scoring 20 points on 9-of-13 shooting and collecting 11 rebounds.

For Los Angeles, Luka Doncic produced a remarkable 22-point, 15-assist, nine-rebound performance, while LeBron James and Deandre Ayton each scored 21 points. Yet the Lakers still came up one point short.

Game Overview and Final Score

The game was played on February 25, 2026, at crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, California, in front of 18,997 fans.

Team	Final Score	Record After Game	Home/Away
Orlando Magic	110	31-26	13-16 Away
Los Angeles Lakers	109	34-23	16-12 Home

Orlando controlled the scoring pattern in a way that kept the Lakers from creating separation.

The Lakers opened the game strongly, scoring 33 points in the first quarter compared with 25 from Orlando. That eight-point advantage gave Los Angeles an early lead and created the impression that the home team could control the contest.

Orlando responded in the second quarter, however, scoring 28 points while limiting Los Angeles to 23. The Magic continued that momentum in the third quarter, winning the period 26-24.

The decisive fourth quarter belonged to Orlando from a scoring perspective. The Magic produced 31 points, while Los Angeles scored 29. That two-point difference was enough to erase the Lakers’ advantage and secure a 110-109 victory.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Quarter	Orlando Magic	Los Angeles Lakers
1st	25	33
2nd	28	23
3rd	26	24
4th	31	29
Final	110	109

The quarter distribution highlights one of the most useful lessons from this game: the final result was not determined by one dramatic scoring burst. Orlando gradually recovered from its first-quarter deficit and finished strongly enough to win.

Lakers vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats: Orlando Leaders

The lakers vs orlando magic match player statsa show a balanced Orlando attack. The Magic did not rely on one player to carry the entire offensive load. Instead, four players reached at least 20 or 22 points, while other contributors helped through defense, rebounding, passing, and floor spacing.

Paolo Banchero

Paolo Banchero was one of Orlando’s most important players throughout the game.

He played 38 minutes and finished with:

• 25 points
• 10 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 12-of-22 shooting
• 2-of-6 from three-point range
• 10-of-11 from the free-throw line
• 4 turnovers
• Plus/minus of +6

The most impressive part of Banchero’s performance was his combination of scoring efficiency and all-around production.

He converted 12 of his 22 field-goal attempts, which translates to approximately 54.5 percent shooting. He was also highly effective at the free-throw line, making 10 of 11 attempts.

His 10 rebounds gave Orlando a strong presence on the glass, while six assists showed that his influence extended beyond scoring.

The four turnovers are one area that could be improved, but his overall contribution remained significant. His +6 plus/minus was also the best among Orlando’s primary high-scoring players listed in the supplied data.

Desmond Bane

Desmond Bane delivered another major offensive performance.

His line included:

• 22 points
• 36 minutes
• 9-of-19 field goals
• 2-of-8 three-pointers
• 6 assists
• 1 rebound
• Plus/minus of +5

Bane shot 47.4 percent from the field. His three-point shooting was less efficient, with two makes on eight attempts, but his ability to score inside the three-point line helped maintain Orlando’s offensive balance.

The six assists were equally important. They indicate that Bane was not simply looking for his own shot. His playmaking helped Orlando generate opportunities for teammates.

Wendell Carter Jr.

Wendell Carter Jr. was arguably Orlando’s most efficient scorer.

He recorded:

• 20 points
• 36 minutes
• 9-of-13 field goals
• 11 rebounds
• 2 assists
• Plus/minus of 0

His 9-of-13 shooting represented a 69.2 percent field-goal percentage.

That efficiency was particularly valuable against a Lakers lineup featuring significant size. Carter Jr. also collected 11 rebounds, giving him a double-double and helping Orlando win the overall rebounding battle.

His zero plus/minus indicates that Orlando’s scoring margin was essentially even during his time on the floor, but his individual efficiency still stands out when examining the box score.

Tristan da Silva

Tristan da Silva provided valuable perimeter shooting and secondary production.

He finished with:

• 13 points
• 32 minutes
• 5-of-9 field goals
• 3-of-5 three-pointers
• 6 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2 steals
• Plus/minus of -6

His three-point shooting was especially effective. He made 60 percent of his attempts from beyond the arc.

Da Silva also contributed six rebounds, three assists, and two steals. Although his plus/minus was negative, the overall statistical profile demonstrates that he affected several areas of the game.

Anthony Black

Anthony Black recorded eight points, four assists, three steals, and two blocks in 30 minutes.

His shooting was less efficient, with four makes on 13 attempts, but his defensive statistics were notable.

Three steals and two blocks show how his impact went beyond scoring. In a one-point game, defensive possessions can be just as important as made baskets.

Orlando’s Supporting Players

Several other Magic players made smaller but meaningful contributions.

Moritz Wagner scored four points and collected three rebounds in 11 minutes.

Jonathan Isaac played 15 minutes and contributed three points, four rebounds, three assists, and two blocks. His defensive activity was particularly useful.

Jevon Carter did not score but grabbed four rebounds and recorded one steal in 16 minutes. His plus/minus was +4.

Jett Howard scored four points and grabbed four rebounds in 21 minutes.

Jase Richardson played five minutes and finished with a plus/minus of +1.

The distribution shows that Orlando received contributions beyond its primary scorers.

Lakers Player Performance Breakdown

Los Angeles had several excellent individual performances, but the team could not convert those efforts into a victory.

The Lakers finished with 109 points, shot 48 percent from the field, and made 20 of 28 free throws. They also blocked eight shots, two more than Orlando.

However, their three-point shooting was only 31 percent, and their 12 turnovers gave Orlando additional opportunities.

Luka Doncic

Luka Doncic produced the most distinctive statistical line for the Lakers.

He finished with:

• 22 points
• 38 minutes
• 8-of-24 field goals
• 2-of-10 three-pointers
• 4-of-9 free throws
• 9 rebounds
• 15 assists
• 2 turnovers
• 1 block
• Plus/minus of +1

The 15 assists are the headline statistic.

Doncic was directly involved in creating a large number of scoring opportunities, even though his own shooting efficiency was not ideal. He made 33.3 percent of his field-goal attempts and 20 percent of his three-point attempts.

That contrast is important. A player can have an inefficient shooting night while still being extremely valuable as a creator.

His nine rebounds also put him just one rebound short of a triple-double.

The two turnovers were relatively controlled considering the enormous amount of offensive responsibility he carried.

LeBron James

LeBron James scored 21 points in 32 minutes.

His complete line was:

• 21 points
• 8-of-13 field goals
• 2-of-6 three-pointers
• 3-of-4 free throws
• 6 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 5 turnovers
• 2 blocks
• Plus/minus of -1

James shot 61.5 percent from the field, making him one of the Lakers’ most efficient scorers.

His two blocks also demonstrate his defensive contribution.

The five turnovers, however, were costly in a game decided by one point. Turnovers do not automatically translate into points for the opponent, but they remove offensive possessions and can create transition opportunities.

Deandre Ayton

Deandre Ayton produced an efficient double-double.

He recorded:

• 21 points
• 32 minutes
• 8-of-11 field goals
• 5-of-5 free throws
• 13 rebounds
• 2 turnovers
• Plus/minus of -2

Ayton converted 72.7 percent of his field-goal attempts.

His 13 rebounds were the highest individual total in the game.

This was a strong interior performance. Ayton was efficient around the basket and gave Los Angeles a reliable scoring and rebounding presence.

Despite that, his team finished with fewer total rebounds than Orlando.

Austin Reaves

Austin Reaves scored 18 points in 35 minutes.

His statistics included:

• 18 points
• 6-of-16 field goals
• 2-of-5 three-pointers
• 4-of-4 free throws
• 2 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 steal
• 2 blocks
• Plus/minus of -4

His perfect four-for-four free-throw shooting helped the Lakers maintain efficiency at the line.

He also contributed two blocks, adding unexpected defensive value from the perimeter.

Rui Hachimura

Rui Hachimura finished with 10 points in 26 minutes.

He shot 4-of-7 from the field and 2-of-5 from three-point range. He also recorded two steals and one block.

His 57.1 percent field-goal shooting made him an efficient secondary scorer.

Marcus Smart

Marcus Smart played 23 minutes and recorded three points, one rebound, one assist, one steal, and one block.

His plus/minus of +8 was the highest among the Lakers players listed in the supplied statistics.

That number is worth noting because it demonstrates why plus/minus should not be ignored simply because a player scored fewer points. Smart’s strongest contribution came through his overall presence while on the court.

Other Lakers Contributors

Luke Kennard scored nine points in 15 minutes while making 3-of-4 field goals and all three of his free throws.

Rui Hachimura added 10 points, while Jarred Vanderbilt scored two points and contributed one steal and one block.

Jake LaRavia scored three points and grabbed two rebounds.

Maxi Kleber played 11 minutes and recorded three rebounds without scoring.

These contributions were not enough to overcome Orlando’s overall statistical balance.

Team Shooting Comparison

One of the more interesting parts of the box score is that the Lakers actually shot better overall from the field.

Category	Orlando Magic	Los Angeles Lakers
Field Goals	43-94	40-83
FG Percentage	46%	48%
Three-Pointers	7-29	9-29
3PT Percentage	24%	31%
Free Throws	17-23	20-28
FT Percentage	74%	71%

At first glance, Los Angeles appears to have had the shooting advantage.

The Lakers made 48 percent of their field goals compared with Orlando’s 46 percent. They also made more three-pointers and shot a higher percentage from beyond the arc.

Yet shooting efficiency alone did not determine the game.

Orlando attempted 94 field goals compared with 83 for Los Angeles. That 11-attempt difference is substantial.

A team can shoot slightly worse but still score more if it generates significantly more attempts.

That is exactly the kind of context that makes raw percentages less useful when viewed in isolation.

Rebounding Was a Major Difference

Orlando finished with 47 rebounds, while Los Angeles had 39.

That is an eight-rebound advantage for the Magic.

The difference becomes more meaningful when considering the individual performances.

Wendell Carter Jr. grabbed 11 rebounds.

Paolo Banchero added 10.

Deandre Ayton led all players with 13 rebounds for Los Angeles, while Luka Doncic contributed nine.

So the Lakers had excellent individual rebounding from Ayton, but Orlando received stronger collective production across its lineup.

An eight-rebound advantage can create additional possessions, particularly when offensive rebounds are involved. The supplied team data does not break the total into offensive and defensive rebounds, so it would be inappropriate to claim a specific offensive-rebound advantage without additional evidence.

Turnovers and Possession Value

Orlando committed 10 turnovers.

Los Angeles committed 12.

That two-turnover difference may appear small, but the game ended with only a one-point margin.

This is a useful reminder that efficiency statistics need to be evaluated according to game context.

The Lakers also had five turnovers from LeBron James and two from Luka Doncic. Their leading creators therefore accounted for seven of the team’s 12 turnovers.

Doncic’s two turnovers are relatively modest given his 15 assists and 38 minutes. James’ five turnovers were more significant because they came alongside a heavy offensive role.

Orlando’s primary players also made mistakes. Banchero had four turnovers, but the Magic still protected the ball better as a team.

Passing and Playmaking Comparison

Orlando finished with 26 assists.

Los Angeles had 24.

The difference was only two assists, but the individual distribution was notable.

Doncic produced 15 assists by himself, meaning he accounted for the majority of Los Angeles’ recorded assists.

Orlando’s six assists from Banchero and six from Bane provided a more distributed playmaking structure.

That distinction matters.

Los Angeles relied heavily on one primary creator, while Orlando received significant passing contributions from multiple players.

This does not automatically make one approach better. It simply shows two different offensive structures within the same game.

Defensive Statistics

The Lakers recorded eight blocks compared with five for Orlando.

Defensive Category	Orlando Magic	Los Angeles Lakers
Steals	7	6
Blocks	5	8
Rebounds	47	39

The Lakers clearly had the edge in shot blocking.

Ayton, James, Reaves, Smart, Hachimura, and other players contributed to Los Angeles’ defensive activity.

Orlando, however, created more steals and won the rebounding battle.

This is another example of why one defensive statistic cannot describe the entire performance.

The Lakers protected the rim effectively, but Orlando generated more possessions through rebounding and finished with fewer turnovers.

Why Orlando Won by One Point

The most useful way to understand this matchup is to look at the combination of factors rather than searching for a single reason.

1. Orlando Recovered From a Slow Start

Los Angeles won the first quarter 33-25.

Instead of allowing the game to get away, Orlando responded immediately with a 28-point second quarter.

That recovery prevented the Lakers from building a larger advantage.

2. The Magic Won the Rebounding Battle

Orlando had 47 rebounds to Los Angeles’ 39.

That eight-rebound advantage helped offset the Lakers’ slightly better shooting percentage.

3. Orlando Generated More Field-Goal Attempts

The Magic attempted 94 field goals.

The Lakers attempted 83.

That 11-attempt difference is one of the most important statistical clues in the entire box score.

4. Los Angeles Had More Turnovers

The Lakers committed 12 turnovers compared with 10 for Orlando.

In a one-point game, every lost possession becomes more important.

5. Orlando Finished Strongly

The Magic scored 31 points in the fourth quarter.

Los Angeles scored 29.

After entering the final period behind, Orlando did enough offensively to close the game.

The Most Important Individual Matchups

Paolo Banchero vs. Lakers Interior Defense

Banchero’s 25 points, 10 rebounds, and six assists made him a central figure.

His ability to score efficiently while also facilitating helped Orlando avoid becoming too dependent on perimeter shooting.

Luka Doncic vs. Orlando’s Defensive Scheme

Doncic’s 15 assists were exceptional.

However, his 8-of-24 shooting and 2-of-10 three-point shooting show that Orlando succeeded in making his scoring less efficient.

The interesting tactical result was that Doncic still generated significant offensive value through passing.

Deandre Ayton vs. Wendell Carter Jr.

Both centers were highly productive.

Ayton scored 21 points and collected 13 rebounds.

Carter Jr. scored 20 points and collected 11 rebounds.

Ayton was slightly more productive statistically, but Carter Jr. was more efficient from the field, shooting 9-of-13 compared with Ayton’s 8-of-11.

Their performances were remarkably similar in overall influence.

LeBron James vs. Orlando’s Perimeter Defense

James scored 21 points on 8-of-13 shooting, which was an efficient performance.

However, his five turnovers stand out.

Orlando did not completely stop James from scoring. Instead, the Magic’s overall defensive pressure contributed to limiting the Lakers’ possession efficiency.

Plus/Minus: What the Numbers Suggest

Plus/minus can be useful, but it should never be treated as a complete evaluation of an individual player.

For Orlando, Banchero finished at +6, Bane at +5, and Anthony Black at +2.

For Los Angeles, Marcus Smart posted the highest listed plus/minus at +8, despite scoring only three points.

That is an excellent example of why plus/minus should be considered alongside points, shooting, rebounds, assists, turnovers, and defensive statistics.

Smart’s +8 does not mean he was necessarily the Lakers’ best player. It means Los Angeles outscored Orlando by eight points during his time on the floor.

Similarly, a negative plus/minus does not automatically indicate poor individual play.

What the Game Says About Efficient Basketball

This matchup provides a useful case study in how basketball games are won.

Los Angeles shot 48 percent from the field.

Orlando shot 46 percent.

The Lakers made nine three-pointers compared with seven for Orlando.

They also made 20 free throws compared with Orlando’s 17.

Yet Orlando won.

Why?

Because basketball is a possession-based sport.

Rebounding, turnovers, shot volume, and scoring efficiency interact with each other.

Orlando had more field-goal attempts, more rebounds, fewer turnovers, and a stronger fourth quarter.

Those advantages were enough to overcome Los Angeles’ superior overall shooting percentage.

A Closer Look at the Lakers’ Offensive Structure

The Lakers’ statistics show a team with several high-level scoring options.

James scored 21.

Ayton scored 21.

Doncic scored 22.

Reaves scored 18.

Hachimura scored 10.

Kennard added nine.

That is a strong scoring distribution.

The concern was not a lack of offensive talent. Instead, the issue was how efficiently the team converted its possessions.

Doncic carried significant creation responsibilities, producing 15 assists. That allowed teammates to generate quality opportunities, but his own shooting efficiency reduced some of the benefit.

James was efficient as a scorer but committed five turnovers.

Ayton was highly efficient and dominated the glass.

The Lakers therefore had strong individual performances in several areas without producing enough collective efficiency to win.

A Closer Look at Orlando’s Offensive Structure

Orlando’s attack was more balanced.

Banchero scored 25.

Bane scored 22.

Carter Jr. scored 20.

Da Silva scored 13.

Black added eight.

Other players supplied additional defensive and rebounding contributions.

Three Orlando players scored at least 20 points.

That distribution made the Magic difficult to contain because the Lakers could not focus exclusively on one scorer.

Orlando also received excellent efficiency from Carter Jr. and strong free-throw production from Banchero.

What Fans Should Take From the Box Score

A box score is more useful when it answers questions rather than simply listing numbers.

For this matchup, the key questions are:

Who scored the most?

Paolo Banchero led Orlando with 25 points. Luka Doncic led the Lakers with 22 points.

Who was the most efficient high-volume scorer?

Wendell Carter Jr. stood out with 20 points on 9-of-13 shooting.

Who controlled the boards?

Deandre Ayton led all players with 13 rebounds, but Orlando won the team rebounding battle 47-39.

Who was the primary playmaker?

Luka Doncic clearly led the game with 15 assists.

Which team protected the ball better?

Orlando, with 10 turnovers compared with 12 for Los Angeles.

Which team defended the rim better statistically?

Los Angeles recorded eight blocks compared with Orlando’s five.

Players Who Had the Biggest Statistical Impact

When evaluating the game as a whole, several players deserve special attention.

Paolo Banchero

Banchero’s combination of 25 points, 10 rebounds, and six assists gave Orlando production across multiple categories.

Luka Doncic

His 15 assists were arguably the most unusual individual statistic in the game. Even with inefficient shooting, he remained a major offensive creator.

Deandre Ayton

Ayton’s 21 points and 13 rebounds represented one of the Lakers’ strongest individual performances.

Wendell Carter Jr.

Carter Jr.’s 20 points on 13 field-goal attempts made him one of the most efficient scorers in the matchup.

Desmond Bane

Bane supplied 22 points and six assists, giving Orlando both scoring and playmaking.

LeBron James

James scored 21 points on 8-of-13 shooting while also recording six rebounds, four assists, and two blocks.

Important Statistical Lessons From the Matchup

There are several broader lessons hidden inside the numbers.

First, field-goal percentage does not determine the winner by itself.

Second, shot volume matters. Orlando attempted 11 more field goals.

Third, rebounding can influence possession totals. The Magic had eight more rebounds.

Fourth, turnovers become especially important in close games. The Lakers gave away two more possessions than Orlando.

Fifth, individual efficiency and team efficiency are different concepts. Several Lakers players shot extremely well, but the team still lost.

Sixth, playmaking can compensate for inefficient scoring to a degree. Doncic’s 15 assists kept his offensive impact high despite his 8-of-24 shooting.

Full Orlando Magic Player Stat Summary

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	+/-
Paolo Banchero	38	25	12-22	2-6	10	6	0	0	+6
Tristan da Silva	32	13	5-9	3-5	6	3	2	0	-6
Wendell Carter Jr.	36	20	9-13	Not listed	11	2	0	0	0
Desmond Bane	36	22	9-19	2-8	1	6	0	0	+5
Anthony Black	30	8	4-13	Not listed	0	4	3	2	+2
Moritz Wagner	11	4	2-6	Not listed	3	0	0	0	-5
Jonathan Isaac	15	3	1-3	Not listed	4	3	0	2	-2
Jevon Carter	16	0	Not listed	Not listed	4	0	1	0	+4
Jett Howard	21	4	1-5	Not listed	4	0	0	0	0
Jase Richardson	5	0	Not listed	Not listed	0	0	0	0	+1

Full Los Angeles Lakers Player Stat Summary

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	+/-
LeBron James	32	21	8-13	2-6	6	4	0	2	-1
Deandre Ayton	32	21	8-11	Not listed	13	0	0	0	-2
Marcus Smart	23	3	1-2	Not listed	1	1	1	1	+8
Luka Doncic	38	22	8-24	2-10	9	15	0	1	+1
Austin Reaves	35	18	6-16	2-5	2	3	1	2	-4
Maxi Kleber	11	0	Not listed	Not listed	3	0	0	0	+1
Rui Hachimura	26	10	4-7	2-5	0	0	2	1	-3
Jarred Vanderbilt	12	2	1-2	Not listed	2	0	1	1	-6
Jake LaRavia	16	3	1-4	1-3	2	0	0	0	0
Luke Kennard	15	9	3-4	Not listed	1	1	0	0	+1

Players Listed as DNP

The supplied box-score information lists the following players as did not play:

• Jase Richardson
• Noah Penda
• Goga Bitadze
• Drew Timme
• Dalton Knecht
• Kobe Bufkin

These players should not be included when calculating the active rotation’s statistical production because they did not record playing time in this matchup.

What the 110-109 Result Means Statistically

A one-point final score usually deserves more careful analysis than a typical win or loss.

Orlando did not dominate Los Angeles.

The Lakers did not have a poor overall shooting night.

Neither team produced a massive turnover disparity.

Instead, the game was decided by a collection of small advantages.

Orlando’s eight-rebound edge, 11 additional field-goal attempts, two fewer turnovers, and 31-point fourth quarter collectively created enough separation to win.

Los Angeles had the better overall field-goal percentage, more three-pointers, more free throws, and more blocks.

That statistical contrast makes this game particularly valuable for readers who want to understand player statistics rather than simply memorize the final score.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Magic in scoring against the Lakers?

Paolo Banchero led Orlando with 25 points. He also recorded 10 rebounds and six assists.

Who led the Lakers in scoring?

Luka Doncic led Los Angeles with 22 points. He also recorded nine rebounds and a game-high 15 assists.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Deandre Ayton had the most individual rebounds with 13. Orlando won the team rebounding battle 47-39.

What was the final score between Orlando and the Lakers?

The Orlando Magic defeated the Los Angeles Lakers 110-109 on February 25, 2026.

Which team shot better from the field?

The Lakers shot 48 percent from the field, while Orlando shot 46 percent.

Why did Orlando win despite shooting a lower percentage?

Orlando attempted 94 field goals compared with 83 for Los Angeles, won the rebounding battle 47-39, committed two fewer turnovers, and scored 31 fourth-quarter points.

Conclusion

The lakers vs orlando magic match statsa from February 25, 2026, provide a strong example of how a basketball game can be decided by several small statistical advantages rather than one overwhelming performance.

Orlando’s 110-109 victory was built around balance. Paolo Banchero delivered 25 points, 10 rebounds, and six assists. Desmond Bane added 22 points and six assists, while Wendell Carter Jr. scored 20 points on highly efficient shooting and grabbed 11 rebounds.

The Lakers also received outstanding individual production. Luka Doncic finished with 22 points, nine rebounds, and 15 assists. LeBron James scored 21 points on 8-of-13 shooting, while Deandre Ayton produced 21 points and 13 rebounds.

The difference came from the collective numbers. Orlando had eight more rebounds, two fewer turnovers, and 11 more field-goal attempts. Those possession-related advantages helped offset Los Angeles’ better field-goal percentage and stronger shot-blocking numbers.

The final score therefore reflects a genuinely competitive contest. Orlando’s ability to recover from an eight-point first-quarter deficit, maintain offensive balance, and produce 31 points in the fourth quarter ultimately allowed the Magic to escape Los Angeles with a one-point victory.