Washington Commanders vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats
The washington commanders vs miami dolphins match player stats from the August 14, 2026 NFL preseason matchup provide a useful look at how both teams performed across passing, rushing, receiving, turnovers, defense, special teams, and individual production. Washington defeated Miami 20-7 at home, opening its preseason record at 1-0 while Miami fell to 0-1. Although preseason statistics need to be viewed in the context of roster rotation and playing time, this box score still reveals several meaningful patterns, particularly Washington’s stronger rushing output and its advantage in creating turnovers.
The game was not decided by one statistical category alone. Washington produced 174 rushing yards on 41 attempts, scored two rushing touchdowns, and intercepted Miami quarterbacks three times. Miami, meanwhile, managed only 109 passing yards from 8 completions on 24 attempts and committed three interceptions. De’Von Achane supplied Miami’s most notable offensive individual contribution with 39 rushing yards and a touchdown, while Washington’s Kaytron Allen carried the ball 23 times for 85 yards and a score.
Because this was a preseason game, the numbers should not be treated in the same way as a full regular season evaluation. Coaches use preseason games to evaluate depth players, younger athletes, roster competition, and specific situations. Even so, the statistical details are valuable for anyone researching the matchup or trying to understand how the 20-7 score developed.
Washington Commanders vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The basic scoreboard tells the story clearly. Washington scored 20 points while Miami scored seven.
| Category | Miami Dolphins | Washington Commanders |
| Final Score | 7 | 20 |
| Passing | 8/24, 109 yards | 15/27, 160 yards |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 3 | 1 |
| Rushing Attempts | 28 | 41 |
| Rushing Yards | 117 | 174 |
| Rushing Average | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Sacks | 1 | 3 |
| Team Tackles | 77 | 52 |
Washington had the stronger overall offensive production in the supplied statistics. Its 174 rushing yards were 57 more than Miami’s 117, while its passing total of 160 yards was 51 yards higher.
The biggest difference, however, came through turnovers.
Miami threw three interceptions, while Washington threw one. That gave Washington a plus-two advantage in interceptions and helped create additional opportunities for the home team.
Neither offense produced a passing touchdown. Instead, all three touchdowns recorded in the game came on the ground. Washington scored twice through its rushing attack, while Miami scored once.
Washington’s Rushing Attack Provided the Foundation
One of the clearest statistical themes was Washington’s ability to run the football consistently.
The Commanders recorded:
- 41 rushing attempts
- 174 rushing yards
- 4.2 yards per carry
- 2 rushing touchdowns
- 22-yard longest run
The volume is particularly notable. Washington attempted 13 more rushes than Miami. That does not automatically mean its running game was dramatically more efficient, because both teams averaged 4.2 yards per carry. Instead, Washington’s advantage came from maintaining a much heavier rushing workload.
Kaytron Allen Led Washington’s Ground Game
Kaytron Allen was Washington’s leading rusher. He carried the ball 23 times for 85 yards, averaging 3.7 yards per attempt and scoring one touchdown.
His numbers show an interesting distinction between volume and efficiency.
Allen received more than half of Washington’s 41 rushing attempts. His 23 carries represented a substantial workload, but his 3.7-yard average was below the team’s overall 4.2-yard rushing average.
That suggests Washington’s total rushing production came from multiple contributors rather than Allen alone.
His 16-yard longest run also indicates that his production was not built around one enormous breakaway play. Instead, the majority of his value came through repeated carries.
For preseason evaluation, that type of workload can be particularly useful because coaches get a larger sample of how a running back handles different down-and-distance situations.
De’Von Achane Produced Miami’s Rushing Highlight
Miami’s most productive individual rusher was De’Von Achane.
He finished with:
- 7 carries
- 39 rushing yards
- 5.6 yards per carry
- 1 rushing touchdown
- 14-yard longest run
Achane’s 5.6-yard average was higher than Allen’s 3.7-yard average and higher than the overall 4.2-yard average for both teams.
However, Achane had only seven carries. That means the two players were used very differently.
Allen’s contribution was based heavily on volume, while Achane generated more yards per attempt on a smaller number of opportunities. That distinction matters when interpreting preseason numbers because playing time and offensive roles can vary substantially from one player to another.
Passing Production Was Limited on Both Sides
The passing statistics were relatively modest.
Miami completed 8 of 24 attempts for 109 yards, with no passing touchdowns and three interceptions. Washington completed 15 of 27 attempts for 160 yards, with no passing touchdowns and one interception.
| Passing Category | Miami | Washington |
| Completions | 8 | 15 |
| Attempts | 24 | 27 |
| Passing Yards | 109 | 160 |
| Average | 4.5 | 7.0 |
| TDs | 0 | 0 |
| INTs | 3 | 1 |
| Sacks | 1 | 3 |
| Passer Rating | 9.2 | 62.1 |
Washington completed seven more passes than Miami and gained 51 additional passing yards.
The efficiency difference is also visible in yards per attempt. Washington averaged 7.0 yards per passing attempt compared with Miami’s 4.5.
The largest separation was turnovers. Miami’s three interceptions significantly reduced the value of its passing production.
Miami’s Passing Game Faced Turnover Problems
Miami’s eight completions produced 109 yards, but three interceptions made the overall passing performance difficult to sustain.
A quarterback can compensate for an occasional incompletion with explosive gains or touchdowns. Turnovers create a different problem because they end possessions and potentially give the opponent additional opportunities.
The supplied statistics list Miami with one sack and three interceptions. Washington recorded three sacks and one interception.
This combination suggests that Miami’s passing offense struggled not only to sustain successful throws but also to protect possessions.
The reported Miami passer rating was 9.2, compared with 62.1 for Washington.
Washington Was More Efficient Through the Air
Washington’s 15 completions on 27 attempts produced 160 yards.
Its 7.0 yards per attempt were 2.5 yards higher than Miami’s 4.5. Washington also threw only one interception.
At the same time, Washington did not throw a touchdown pass. Its 20-point total therefore relied substantially on rushing touchdowns and other scoring opportunities rather than aerial touchdowns.
That is an important detail for readers who look only at the final score. Washington’s victory was not driven by a prolific passing performance. The statistical foundation was a combination of better passing efficiency, a larger rushing workload, and a major turnover advantage.
Receiving Numbers and Individual Targets
The supplied receiving statistics show Miami with eight receptions for 109 yards and Washington with 15 receptions for 189 yards.
| Receiving Category | Miami | Washington |
| Receptions | 8 | 15 |
| Receiving Yards | 109 | 189 |
| Average | 13.6 | 12.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Long | 28 | 28 |
| Targets | 24 | 27 |
Washington recorded seven more receptions and 80 more receiving yards according to the supplied team statistics.
Neither team recorded a receiving touchdown.
There is one important data-quality point worth mentioning. The supplied Washington team statistics list 189 receiving yards while the passing line lists 160 passing yards. Normally, team receiving yards and team passing yards should reconcile closely in a standard box score, subject to the way a source handles sacks or other statistical classifications. Because the supplied figures do not fully reconcile, the individual receiving numbers should be interpreted as reported rather than recalculated into a different figure.
The same principle applies throughout this article: the analysis uses the supplied game data without inventing missing player statistics.
Jacoby Jones Led Washington Receivers
Jacoby Jones was Washington’s leading receiver according to the supplied individual statistics.
He recorded:
- 2 receptions
- 33 yards
- 16.5 yards per reception
- 28-yard longest reception
- 0 touchdowns
His two catches accounted for 33 receiving yards.
The 28-yard reception was particularly significant because it represented most of his yardage on just one play. His 16.5-yard average also exceeded Washington’s reported team receiving average of 12.6 yards.
Caleb Douglas Led Miami’s Listed Receivers
Caleb Douglas was listed as Miami’s leading receiver with one reception for 28 yards.
His single catch was also the longest reception recorded by a Miami player in the supplied individual statistics.
Douglas therefore generated meaningful yardage despite limited reception volume. His 28-yard catch represented more than a quarter of Miami’s 109 passing yards.
Again, preseason context is important. A small number of receptions does not provide enough evidence to draw broad conclusions about a player’s long-term role.
Turnovers Changed the Statistical Balance
Turnovers were arguably the most important defensive statistic in the game.
Miami recorded one interception, while Washington recorded three.
The individual interception statistics supplied are:
Miami
Marco Wilson recorded one interception and returned it five yards.
Washington
Washington recorded three interceptions:
- Ale Kaho: 1 interception, 22 return yards
- Quan Martin: 1 interception
- Malik Spencer: 1 interception
The three Washington interceptions were a major difference between the teams.
Washington’s defense did not need to produce an overwhelming number of sacks to disrupt Miami. Instead, it created possession-changing plays through the secondary.
The 22-yard interception return by Kaho was particularly notable because it provided additional field position after the turnover.
For a game that finished 20-7, three interceptions against Miami’s passing attack are a major part of the statistical explanation.
Defensive Statistics Tell a Different Story
The team tackle totals were:
- Miami: 77 total tackles, including 41 solo
- Washington: 52 total tackles, including 32 solo
At first glance, Miami’s higher tackle total might appear surprising because Washington won comfortably.
But tackle totals do not directly measure defensive quality.
A defense can record many tackles because the opponent runs numerous plays, completes passes underneath, or reaches the second level before being stopped. Tackles must therefore be interpreted alongside possession, turnovers, yards, and scoring.
Miami also recorded three sacks compared with Washington’s one. Miami had five quarterback hits, while Washington had four.
So although Washington won the game and created three interceptions, Miami’s defense still produced several disruption statistics.
Miami Recorded More Tackles and Sacks
Miami’s 77 tackles exceeded Washington’s 52 by 25.
Miami also recorded:
- 3 sacks
- 2 tackles for loss
- 7 passes defended
- 5 quarterback hits
Washington recorded:
- 1 sack
- 2 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
This creates an important distinction between defensive volume and defensive outcome.
Miami generated more tackles, sacks, quarterback hits, and passes defended in several categories, yet Washington generated the more consequential turnover total.
That is why looking at one defensive statistic in isolation can produce a misleading picture of the game.
Special Teams Played a Supporting Role
Special teams did not produce the game’s most dramatic numbers, but the statistics help complete the picture.
Kick Returns
Miami recorded three kick returns for 44 yards, averaging 14.7 yards per return.
Washington had two kick returns for 57 yards, averaging 28.5 yards per return.
Washington therefore had 13 fewer total kick return yards but averaged nearly twice as many yards per return.
Its longest kick return was 30 yards, compared with 25 for Miami.
Punt Returns
Both teams averaged 6.0 yards per punt return.
Miami had:
- 3 punt returns
- 18 yards
- 6.0 average
- 20-yard long
Washington had:
- 2 punt returns
- 12 yards
- 6.0 average
- 12-yard long
The overall return efficiency was therefore identical by average, despite different numbers of attempts.
Punting
Bradley Pinion handled Miami’s punting duties, recording six punts for 269 yards. His average was 44.8 yards, with two punts inside the 20 and a 53-yard long.
Washington’s Matt Haack also punted six times, totaling 268 yards and averaging 44.7 yards. He recorded one touchback, two punts inside the 20, and a 52-yard long.
The punting battle was remarkably close in average and total yardage.
| Punting Category | Bradley Pinion | Matt Haack |
| Punts | 6 | 6 |
| Yards | 269 | 268 |
| Average | 44.8 | 44.7 |
| Inside 20 | 2 | 2 |
| Long | 53 | 52 |
The one-yard difference in total punting yardage illustrates just how closely matched the two punters were statistically.
Kicking and Scoring Breakdown
Miami’s scoring included one extra point by Riley Patterson.
Patterson went 1-for-1 on extra points for one point.
Washington’s kicking statistics show Jake Moody and Drew Stevens combining for two field goals and two extra points. The supplied figures list 8 kicking points for Washington.
Because Washington finished with 20 points and scored two rushing touchdowns, the rushing touchdowns accounted for 12 points before considering the remaining scoring details.
The important point is that Washington’s scoring profile was diversified. It did not depend on passing touchdowns.
What the Numbers Say About Offensive Balance
One of the clearest observations from the game is that Washington’s offense was more balanced between the run and pass.
The Commanders generated 160 passing yards and 174 rushing yards according to the supplied statistics.
Miami recorded 109 passing yards and 117 rushing yards.
That means both teams actually had relatively similar proportions of passing and rushing production, but Washington generated more yardage in both categories.
The difference was not simply that Washington ran the ball better on a per-carry basis. Both teams averaged 4.2 yards per rushing attempt.
Instead, Washington had:
- More rushing attempts
- More rushing yards
- More rushing touchdowns
- More completed passes
- More passing yards
- Fewer interceptions
That combination explains why the final score favored Washington.
Why Miami’s 117 Rushing Yards Did Not Translate Into More Points
Miami averaged 4.2 yards per rushing attempt, matching Washington.
That is a respectable team rushing average in isolation, but the Dolphins produced only one rushing touchdown.
The biggest individual contribution came from Achane, who averaged 5.6 yards on seven carries and scored once.
The rest of the rushing production did not result in another touchdown in the supplied statistics.
This highlights an important football principle: moving the ball and finishing drives are separate challenges.
A team can produce reasonable yardage but still struggle to turn those yards into points if possessions end through turnovers, stalled drives, penalties, missed opportunities, or failures in scoring territory.
The supplied data gives a particularly strong example because Miami produced 117 rushing yards and 109 passing yards, yet finished with only seven points.
Why Washington’s Three Interceptions Matter
The three Washington interceptions deserve special attention because they directly affected possession efficiency.
Miami attempted 24 passes and completed only eight. Three of the 16 incompletions were interceptions.
That means turnovers represented a substantial portion of Miami’s unsuccessful passing attempts.
Washington’s defensive backs and defenders converted three passing mistakes into takeaways. Kaho, Martin, and Spencer each recorded one interception.
Washington itself threw one interception, meaning the overall interception margin was plus two.
In a low-scoring preseason game, a plus-two turnover differential can have an outsized effect because there may be fewer offensive possessions and fewer opportunities to recover from mistakes.
Comparing the Key Individual Performers
The individual statistics highlight several players who contributed in different ways.
| Player | Team | Key Contribution |
| Kaytron Allen | Washington | 23 carries, 85 yards, 1 TD |
| De’Von Achane | Miami | 7 carries, 39 yards, 1 TD |
| Jacoby Jones | Washington | 2 receptions, 33 yards |
| Caleb Douglas | Miami | 1 reception, 28 yards |
| Ale Kaho | Washington | 1 INT, 22 return yards |
| Quan Martin | Washington | 1 INT |
| Malik Spencer | Washington | 1 INT |
| Marco Wilson | Miami | 1 INT, 5 return yards |
Allen stands out for rushing volume.
Achane stands out for rushing efficiency among the listed leading rushers.
Jones produced Washington’s largest listed receiving total, while Douglas provided Miami’s largest listed receiving gain.
On defense, Washington’s three separate interception contributors were central to the turnover story.
Understanding the Preseason Context
The word “preseason” is important when analyzing this game.
Regular season statistics are generally used to evaluate established performance over meaningful competitive stakes. Preseason statistics serve a different purpose.
Coaches may use preseason games to assess:
- Young players competing for roster spots
- Backup quarterbacks
- Running back depth
- Receiver rotations
- Defensive personnel
- Special teams roles
- Scheme execution
- Tackling
- Situational football
As a result, a player’s preseason statistics should not automatically be projected across an entire regular season.
For example, Allen’s 23 carries are a meaningful fact from this game, but the number alone does not establish what his workload would be in a regular season contest.
Likewise, Achane’s 5.6 yards per carry are useful when describing his performance on August 14, but seven carries are too small a sample to establish a season-long rushing efficiency rate.
This distinction is especially important for readers searching player statistics because raw numbers can appear more predictive than they actually are.
A Practical Way to Analyze NFL Player Statistics
When reviewing a matchup like this, it is useful to move beyond the final score.
A practical statistical review can follow six steps.
1. Start With Total Production
Look at passing yards, rushing yards, and total scoring.
Washington had the advantage in both listed offensive yardage categories.
2. Check Efficiency
Passing yards per attempt and rushing yards per attempt provide more context than raw totals.
Both teams averaged 4.2 yards per rushing attempt, while Washington averaged 7.0 passing yards per attempt compared with Miami’s 4.5.
3. Examine Turnovers
Turnovers can change the direction of a game quickly.
Washington had three interceptions while Miami had one.
4. Look at Individual Volume
Allen’s 23 carries and Achane’s seven carries tell different stories than their yardage totals alone.
Volume helps explain how players were used.
5. Separate Defensive Volume From Impact
Miami had 77 tackles and three sacks. Washington had 52 tackles and one sack.
Yet Washington created three interceptions.
That shows why defensive evaluation should include multiple categories.
6. Consider Game Context
Finally, determine whether the game was preseason or regular season.
The August 14, 2026 matchup was an NFL preseason game, so player usage and statistical interpretation should be treated accordingly.
Washington Commanders vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The statistical picture can be summarized through several important observations.
Washington won the rushing volume battle. The Commanders ran 41 times for 174 yards, compared with Miami’s 28 attempts for 117 yards.
Both teams averaged 4.2 yards per rushing attempt. Washington’s advantage therefore came largely from greater rushing volume and two rushing touchdowns.
Washington was more efficient passing the football. The Commanders completed 15 of 27 passes for 160 yards, while Miami completed 8 of 24 for 109 yards.
Turnovers heavily favored Washington. The Commanders intercepted Miami three times and threw one interception themselves.
Miami’s defense produced strong volume numbers. The Dolphins recorded 77 tackles, three sacks, seven passes defended, and five quarterback hits in the supplied statistics.
Washington’s individual rushing leader was Kaytron Allen. He carried 23 times for 85 yards and one touchdown.
Miami’s leading listed rusher was De’Von Achane. He produced 39 yards and one touchdown on seven attempts.
Jacoby Jones led Washington’s listed receiving production. He recorded two catches for 33 yards.
Caleb Douglas led Miami’s listed receiving production. He had one catch for 28 yards.
Special teams were closely matched in several areas. Both teams averaged 6.0 yards per punt return, while their punters averaged 44.8 and 44.7 yards respectively.
How to Read These Numbers Without Overreacting
The most useful lesson from preseason statistics is to identify what happened without assigning more meaning to the numbers than they can support.
Washington’s 20-7 win is an established result.
Its 174 rushing yards, 160 passing yards, and three interceptions are also measurable elements of the supplied box score.
What those numbers mean for the regular season is a separate question.
A preseason game can reveal execution problems, successful individual performances, depth contributions, and areas that coaches may want to improve. It cannot, by itself, establish a team’s future record or guarantee that a particular player will maintain the same production.
This is why context should remain part of any serious statistical analysis.
For readers researching the matchup, the most useful approach is to combine the scoreboard with efficiency, volume, turnovers, and individual contributions rather than relying on a single headline statistic.
Data Notes for Readers
The figures in this article are based on the game data supplied for the August 14, 2026 preseason matchup.
One discrepancy is worth making transparent. The supplied team receiving line lists Washington with 189 receiving yards, while the supplied Washington passing line lists 160 passing yards. Those figures do not directly reconcile under a conventional box-score presentation.
Rather than creating or guessing missing player-level statistics, this article preserves the supplied figures and identifies the discrepancy.
This is important for trustworthy sports content. When source data contains a number that does not clearly reconcile with another number, the responsible approach is to flag the issue rather than silently alter it.
That approach also helps readers distinguish reported statistics from analytical interpretation.
FAQs
What was the final score between Washington and Miami?
Washington defeated Miami 20-7 in the August 14, 2026 NFL preseason game.
Who was Washington’s leading rusher?
Kaytron Allen led Washington with 23 carries for 85 yards and one rushing touchdown.
Who was Miami’s leading rusher?
De’Von Achane led Miami with seven carries for 39 yards and one touchdown.
How many interceptions did Washington record?
Washington recorded three interceptions. Ale Kaho, Quan Martin, and Malik Spencer each recorded one.
How did the teams compare in passing?
Washington completed 15 of 27 passes for 160 yards, while Miami completed 8 of 24 for 109 yards. Washington threw one interception, while Miami threw three.
Was this a regular season game?
No. The matchup was an NFL preseason game played on August 14, 2026.
Conclusion
The washington commanders vs miami dolphins match player stats show a game shaped by several connected factors rather than one isolated performance. Washington finished with the higher passing and rushing totals, ran the ball 41 times, scored two rushing touchdowns, and created three interceptions.
Miami’s numbers were more uneven. The Dolphins produced 117 rushing yards and 109 passing yards, with Achane providing a strong 5.6-yard rushing average and one touchdown. Their defense also recorded 77 tackles, three sacks, and five quarterback hits in the supplied data.
The decisive statistical difference was possession security. Miami threw three interceptions, while Washington threw one. In a game that produced only 27 combined points, those extra possessions were especially significant.
The matchup also demonstrates why preseason analysis requires context. Allen’s 23-carry workload, Achane’s efficiency, the receiving totals, defensive tackle counts, and interception numbers all describe what happened on August 14, but they should be understood as game-specific evidence rather than automatic predictions of regular season performance.
Overall, the box score provides a detailed snapshot of Washington’s 20-7 preseason victory, with rushing volume, passing efficiency, and turnover creation standing out as the central statistical themes.
