Los Angeles Rams vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats from the 2026 NFC Divisional Playoff tell a much more interesting story than the final 20-17 score suggests. Los Angeles survived a dramatic overtime battle at Soldier Field, overcoming a late Chicago touchdown and a difficult offensive performance to advance to the NFC Championship Game. The Rams won despite Matthew Stafford throwing no touchdowns and completing only 20 of 42 passes, while the Bears received two touchdown passes from Caleb Williams but could not overcome three interceptions. (ESPN.com)
The game was played on January 18, 2026, with the Rams entering at 12-5 and Chicago at 11-6. Los Angeles ultimately prevailed 20-17 in overtime after Harrison Mevis converted a 42-yard field goal with 3:19 remaining in the extra period. (ESPN.com)
For readers searching for the los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats, the most useful way to understand this game is not simply to list passing, rushing, and receiving numbers. The important story is how individual performances shaped the game’s momentum, why Chicago appeared to have control at certain points, and how Los Angeles managed to win despite several statistical disadvantages.
Los Angeles Rams vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats at a Glance
| Category | Los Angeles Rams | Chicago Bears |
| Final Score | 20 | 17 |
| Result | Win | Loss |
| Overtime | Yes | Yes |
| Regular Season Record | 12-5 | 11-6 |
| Passing | Matthew Stafford: 20/42, 258 yards | Caleb Williams: 23/42, 257 yards |
| Passing TDs | 0 | 2 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 3 |
| Rushing Leader | Kyren Williams: 21 carries, 87 yards | D’Andre Swift: 19 carries, 76 yards |
| Team Rushing | 31 carries, 111 yards | 39 carries, 160 yards |
| Receiving Leader | Colby Parkinson: 3 catches, 56 yards | Colston Loveland: 4 catches, 56 yards |
| Team Receptions | 20 | 23 |
| Team Receiving Yards | 258 | 257 |
| Sacks Allowed | 4 | 0 |
| Team Interceptions | 3 | 0 |
| Field Goals | Harrison Mevis: 2/2 | Cairo Santos: 1/1 |
| Overtime Result | 42-yard winning FG | Interception ended possession |
The numbers immediately reveal something unusual. Chicago produced more rushing yards, allowed no sacks, and received two passing touchdowns from Williams. Yet Los Angeles won because turnovers and situational execution outweighed several of Chicago’s statistical advantages.
How the Game Was Decided
The Rams opened the game with a 14-play, 85-yard touchdown drive capped by a four-yard Kyren Williams rushing touchdown. Chicago answered in the second quarter when Williams connected with DJ Moore for a three-yard touchdown.
Cairo Santos then gave Chicago its first lead with a 48-yard field goal. Los Angeles responded with a 32-yard Harrison Mevis field goal just before halftime, leaving the score tied at 10-10.
The third quarter produced no points.
That defensive and field-position battle continued into the fourth quarter. Williams scored his second rushing touchdown on a five-yard run to put Los Angeles ahead 17-10. Chicago appeared to be running out of time, but Caleb Williams produced one of the game’s defining moments.
With 18 seconds remaining and Chicago facing fourth-and-4, Williams found Cole Kmet for a 14-yard touchdown. The successful extra point tied the game at 17-17 and forced overtime. (ESPN.com)
Overtime changed everything.
Los Angeles initially punted after a short possession. Chicago then moved into Rams territory, converting multiple important plays and eventually reaching the Los Angeles 22-yard line. But Williams attempted a deep pass intended for DJ Moore that was intercepted by Kam Curl at the Rams’ 22.
That turnover gave Los Angeles another opportunity.
The Rams used 10 plays to move 54 yards before Mevis kicked the 42-yard field goal that ended the game. (ESPN.com)
Matthew Stafford’s Passing Performance
Matthew Stafford’s final passing line was:
20 completions on 42 attempts, 258 yards, 0 touchdowns, 0 interceptions, 4 sacks for 29 yards, 31.5 QBR and a 67.4 passer rating. (ESPN.com)
At first glance, that is not the statistical profile normally associated with a winning playoff quarterback.
Stafford completed only 47.6% of his passes and averaged 6.1 yards per attempt. He did not throw a touchdown and was sacked four times.
However, there is an important distinction between quarterback statistics and quarterback responsibility.
Stafford avoided the major mistake that Chicago could not avoid. He did not throw an interception.
In a game decided by three points in overtime, that mattered enormously.
The Rams quarterback also continued to operate under difficult circumstances. Chicago’s defense generated four sacks and six tackles for loss, while Los Angeles’ offense struggled to establish consistent rhythm for large portions of the game.
ESPN reported that Los Angeles had only 174 total yards by the end of the third quarter, its lowest third-quarter yardage total of the season. (ESPN.com)
That makes Stafford’s performance more interesting than the raw completion percentage suggests. He did not dominate the game, but he helped prevent the game from being lost through a catastrophic turnover.
Stafford’s Biggest Contribution
The defining feature of Stafford’s performance was restraint.
There were opportunities for explosive plays, but Chicago’s defensive pressure made sustained passing difficult. Stafford absorbed four sacks and still finished with 258 passing yards.
He also finished without an interception.
For this particular game, that was enough because the Rams’ defense repeatedly gave the offense additional opportunities.
Caleb Williams’ Passing Performance
Caleb Williams finished with:
- 23 completions
- 42 attempts
- 257 passing yards
- 2 passing touchdowns
- 3 interceptions
- 6.1 yards per attempt
- 70.4 QBR
- 59.3 passer rating
- 0 sacks
Statistically, Williams was one of the game’s most complicated players.
His 257 passing yards were almost identical to Stafford’s 258. He completed three more passes than Stafford and produced two touchdowns.
He also did not take a single sack.
Yet his three interceptions became the most damaging statistic in the game.
The first interception came early in the opening quarter when Cobie Durant intercepted Williams’ pass intended for Colston Loveland. Durant returned the interception 14 yards, and although the Rams did not turn that possession into an immediate touchdown, it stopped a promising Chicago drive. (ESPN.com)
The second interception came later in the game.
The third was the decisive mistake.
The Overtime Interception
Chicago had possession in overtime and moved 36 yards on a 10-play drive. The Bears converted several important plays and eventually reached the Rams’ side of the field.
At 6:47 of overtime, Williams attempted a deep pass intended for DJ Moore.
Kam Curl intercepted it at the Los Angeles 22-yard line.
That play completely changed the game.
Instead of Chicago attempting to win or at least extend the possession, Los Angeles received the ball with a chance to end the game. The Rams did exactly that, eventually reaching field-goal range for Mevis. (ESPN.com)
This is one of the clearest examples of why quarterback evaluation cannot rely exclusively on passing yards and touchdowns.
Williams produced more touchdowns than Stafford, avoided sacks, and nearly led an incredible fourth-quarter comeback. But the three interceptions ultimately outweighed those positives.
Kyren Williams’ Impact on the Rams
Kyren Williams was the Rams’ most important offensive player.
His rushing statistics:
- 21 carries
- 87 yards
- 4.1 yards per carry
- 2 touchdowns
- 10-yard longest run
Both Rams touchdowns during regulation came from Williams.
His first touchdown came on a four-yard run during the opening drive.
His second came on a five-yard run in the fourth quarter that gave Los Angeles a 17-10 advantage.
The Rams finished with only 111 rushing yards as a team, but Williams accounted for 87 of them. That means he produced roughly 78% of the Rams’ rushing yardage.
That workload is significant in a playoff game.
Why Kyren Williams Mattered
Los Angeles struggled to create consistent offensive rhythm through the air. That increased the importance of its rushing attack.
Williams gave the Rams something they could rely on.
He did not produce a spectacular average, but 21 carries kept the offense functional and helped Los Angeles control portions of the game.
His two touchdowns were even more important.
When a quarterback does not throw a touchdown, rushing touchdowns often become the difference between winning and losing. That was exactly what happened here.
D’Andre Swift’s Strong Rushing Performance
D’Andre Swift was the Bears’ leading rusher.
His final numbers were:
- 19 carries
- 76 yards
- 4.0 yards per carry
- 0 touchdowns
- 13-yard longest run
Chicago actually had the better team rushing performance.
The Bears finished with 160 rushing yards on 39 attempts, averaging 4.1 yards per carry.
That is substantially more rushing production than the Rams generated.
Chicago’s ability to run the ball helped keep its offense balanced. It also contributed to the Bears’ ability to maintain possession and move the football without relying entirely on Williams.
But there was one missing element.
Chicago could not convert its rushing production into a rushing touchdown.
That difference became important because the Rams found the end zone twice through Kyren Williams.
Rams Receiving Stats
The Rams finished with:
- 20 receptions
- 258 receiving yards
- 12.9 yards per reception
- 0 receiving touchdowns
- 40 targets
- 35-yard longest reception
Colby Parkinson led the Rams in receiving yardage:
- 3 receptions
- 56 yards
- 18.7 yards per reception
- 35-yard longest reception
- 7 targets
Parkinson’s numbers are particularly interesting because he did not need a large number of catches to lead the team.
His 56 yards represented nearly 22% of Stafford’s passing total.
The Rams’ receiving production was spread across multiple players rather than being dominated by one receiver.
That distribution helped Los Angeles survive a night when its passing game never became consistently explosive.
Bears Receiving Stats
Chicago recorded:
- 23 receptions
- 257 receiving yards
- 11.2 yards per reception
- 2 receiving touchdowns
- 42 targets
- 34-yard longest reception
Colston Loveland led the Bears in receiving yardage:
- 4 receptions
- 56 yards
- 14.0 yards per reception
- 23-yard longest reception
- 10 targets
Loveland’s involvement was especially notable because Williams targeted him frequently.
However, the Bears’ most memorable receiving contribution came from Cole Kmet.
Kmet caught the 14-yard touchdown pass that tied the game with only 18 seconds remaining in regulation. That catch transformed what appeared to be a Rams victory into an overtime thriller. (ESPN.com)
DJ Moore also scored a touchdown in the second quarter on a three-yard reception from Williams.
Therefore, both of Chicago’s passing touchdowns came from different receivers.
Comparing the Quarterbacks
A direct comparison makes the game easier to understand.
| Statistic | Matthew Stafford | Caleb Williams |
| Completions | 20 | 23 |
| Attempts | 42 | 42 |
| Completion Rate | 47.6% | 54.8% |
| Passing Yards | 258 | 257 |
| Yards per Attempt | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Passing TDs | 0 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 3 |
| Sacks | 4 | 0 |
| QBR | 31.5 | 70.4 |
| Passer Rating | 67.4 | 59.3 |
This table demonstrates why quarterback statistics need context.
Williams had the higher QBR and more passing touchdowns.
Stafford had zero interceptions.
Williams was not sacked.
Stafford was sacked four times.
Yet Stafford’s team won.
The most decisive difference was turnover management.
Turnovers Were the Hidden Story
The final score was 20-17, but the turnover margin tells another story.
Los Angeles recorded three interceptions.
Chicago recorded none.
The Rams had two fumbles but lost neither. Chicago had one fumble and also lost none.
That means Chicago’s biggest problem was not ball security through fumbles. It was quarterback interceptions.
Two of the three interceptions came from Cobie Durant and Kam Curl, with Durant recording two interceptions and Curl adding the overtime interception.
Cobie Durant’s Two Interceptions
Durant made one of the earliest major defensive plays of the night.
He intercepted Williams in the first quarter and returned the ball 14 yards.
Later, Durant added another interception, giving the Rams two picks from the same defender.
His performance prevented Chicago from turning its offensive yardage into a more commanding lead.
Kam Curl’s Game-Ending Interception
Curl’s interception in overtime was the most valuable defensive play of the night.
The Bears were already inside Rams territory.
A few more successful plays could have put Chicago in position to attempt a game-winning field goal.
Instead, Curl ended the possession.
The Rams then converted the turnover into the winning field goal.
That is the clearest connection between an individual defensive statistic and the final score.
Defensive Player Stats Tell a Different Story
The Bears actually recorded more sacks.
Chicago had:
- 74 total tackles
- 42 solo tackles
- 4 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 7 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
Los Angeles recorded:
- 89 total tackles
- 42 solo tackles
- 0 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 9 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
So the Bears’ defense was more successful at bringing down Stafford.
The Rams’ defense, however, was much more successful at creating turnovers.
That contrast is one of the most important lessons from this game.
Pressure vs. Turnovers
A defense can dominate a quarterback through sacks and pressure.
Another defense can dominate through interceptions and disruption.
Chicago chose the first path.
Los Angeles found the second.
The Rams did not sack Williams, but they intercepted him three times.
That was enough to compensate for Chicago’s stronger rushing output and four sacks.
Special Teams Made the Difference
Special teams are easy to overlook when discussing player statistics, but this game was decided by kicking.
Harrison Mevis finished:
- 2 field goals made on 2 attempts
- Long: 42 yards
- 2 extra points
- 8 total points
His final kick was the most important.
With 3:19 left in overtime, Mevis converted from 42 yards to win the game.
Cairo Santos was also perfect on field goals, making his only attempt from 48 yards. He added two extra points for five total points.
The kicking comparison was therefore:
| Kicker | FG | Long | XP | Points |
| Harrison Mevis | 2/2 | 42 | 2/2 | 8 |
| Cairo Santos | 1/1 | 48 | 2/2 | 5 |
The difference was not accuracy.
Both kickers performed perfectly.
The difference was opportunity.
Mevis received the final opportunity because the Rams’ defense created the overtime interception.
Punting and Field Position
Ethan Evans punted eight times for Los Angeles.
His numbers:
- 8 punts
- 380 yards
- 47.5-yard average
- 61-yard long
- 3 inside the 20
- 1 touchback
Chicago’s Tory Taylor recorded:
- 3 punts
- 141 yards
- 47.0-yard average
- 51-yard long
- 1 inside the 20
- 0 touchbacks
The Rams’ eight punts demonstrate how difficult their offense found it to sustain drives.
At the same time, Evans’ average and long punt helped Los Angeles manage field position during a defensive struggle.
Chicago’s three punts show that the Bears moved the ball more consistently during regulation.
That makes the final result even more striking.
Los Angeles was not winning because its offense consistently moved the ball.
It was winning because its defense and special teams repeatedly kept the game within reach.
The Fourth Quarter Changed the Entire Game
The fourth quarter deserves special attention.
Los Angeles began the quarter with a 10-10 tie.
The Rams eventually produced a 14-play, 91-yard touchdown drive that lasted 6:02.
Kyren Williams finished the drive with a five-yard touchdown.
Suddenly Los Angeles led 17-10.
For much of the remaining period, that looked like enough.
But Chicago did not collapse.
The Bears mounted a seven-play, 50-yard drive that ended with Kmet’s 14-yard touchdown reception.
The timing was almost unbelievable.
The touchdown came with only 18 seconds remaining.
That late score sent the game into overtime and produced one of the most dramatic sequences of the postseason. (ESPN.com)
Overtime Player Performance
Overtime was short but decisive.
Los Angeles began with the ball and eventually punted after three plays.
Chicago then held the ball for a long possession.
The Bears ran 10 plays and gained 36 yards.
Williams completed several passes during the drive, while Swift and the Chicago rushing attack continued to move the ball.
The Bears eventually reached the Rams’ 22-yard line.
Then came the decisive mistake.
Williams threw the interception to Curl.
Los Angeles took over and drove 54 yards on 10 plays.
Mevis converted the 42-yard field goal.
The Rams won 20-17. (NFL)
The official overtime statistics show Los Angeles gained 61 net yards while Chicago gained 36. Chicago had the ball longer during the overtime period, but the Rams ultimately produced the only points. (NFL)
Why the Rams Won Despite Losing Several Statistical Battles
This is where the los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats become especially valuable.
A box score can tell you what happened.
A deeper analysis explains why.
1. Los Angeles Won the Turnover Battle
The Rams intercepted Williams three times.
Chicago did not intercept Stafford.
That was the biggest statistical advantage Los Angeles possessed.
2. Kyren Williams Scored Twice
Williams did not rush for 100 yards, but he scored both Rams touchdowns during regulation.
His ability to finish drives was crucial.
3. Stafford Avoided the Fatal Mistake
Stafford’s passing numbers were underwhelming.
But zero interceptions mattered.
The Rams did not give Chicago an extra possession through a quarterback turnover.
4. The Rams Defense Created the Decisive Play
The defense did not record a sack.
Instead, it created three interceptions.
Curl’s overtime interception directly led to the winning field goal.
5. Los Angeles Won the Situational Battle
Chicago had more rushing yards and more sacks.
Los Angeles had better results in the moments that mattered most.
That distinction is often what separates playoff winners from teams with impressive box-score statistics.
Why Chicago Lost Despite 160 Rushing Yards
Chicago’s 160 rushing yards were impressive.
The Bears averaged 4.1 yards per carry compared with 3.6 for Los Angeles.
Swift averaged 4.0 yards per carry and gave Chicago a reliable rushing presence.
Yet rushing efficiency alone does not determine a playoff game.
Chicago failed to score a rushing touchdown.
The Bears also threw three interceptions.
Those turnovers effectively erased some of the value created by the rushing attack.
This is an important analytical point: moving the football and converting possessions into points are different skills.
Chicago often moved the ball well.
Los Angeles was better at turning defensive opportunities into game-winning possessions.
The Most Important Individual Performances
Kyren Williams
Williams was the Rams’ offensive MVP.
His 87 rushing yards were not overwhelming, but his two touchdowns directly accounted for 12 of Los Angeles’ 20 points.
Cobie Durant
Durant intercepted Williams twice.
Those turnovers stopped Chicago drives and prevented the Bears from gaining control of the game.
Kam Curl
Curl’s overtime interception was arguably the most important individual play of the game.
Without it, Chicago would have remained in position to win.
Harrison Mevis
Mevis scored eight points and delivered the game-winning 42-yard field goal.
His final kick ended the game.
Caleb Williams
Williams deserves credit for keeping Chicago alive.
He threw two touchdown passes and produced the late fourth-down touchdown that forced overtime.
But his three interceptions ultimately overshadowed his positive plays.
Cole Kmet
Kmet’s fourth-quarter touchdown reception was one of the game’s most memorable moments.
His 14-yard touchdown with 18 seconds remaining forced overtime and nearly completed another Chicago comeback.
D’Andre Swift
Swift led Chicago in rushing with 76 yards.
His 19 carries helped the Bears maintain offensive balance.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Teams
The numbers reveal contrasting team identities.
Los Angeles was more opportunistic.
Chicago was more productive in several traditional offensive categories.
The Bears ran for 160 yards compared with 111 for the Rams.
Chicago allowed no sacks while Los Angeles allowed four.
The Bears had 23 receptions compared with 20 for Los Angeles.
Yet the Rams won because they produced three interceptions and committed none through the passing game.
This is why playoff analysis requires more than simply asking which team had more yards.
A team can win the yardage battle and still lose.
A team can lose the sack battle and still win.
A quarterback can throw two touchdowns and still be responsible for the game’s most damaging statistical mistake.
A Better Way to Read NFL Box Scores
The los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats provide a useful example of how to analyze an NFL game properly.
Instead of looking only at the biggest numbers, examine five areas.
First: Turnover Differential
Turnovers often create the largest swings in expected scoring opportunities.
Here, Los Angeles had three interceptions while Chicago had none.
Second: Red-Zone Results
Touchdowns matter more than raw yardage.
Kyren Williams scored twice for the Rams, while Chicago’s touchdowns came through the passing game.
Third: Explosive Plays
Look beyond total yards.
A few long completions or runs can change field position and force defensive adjustments.
Fourth: Third-Down Execution
Sustaining drives determines how often an offense gives its defense rest and creates scoring chances.
Fifth: Situational Football
The final minutes of regulation and overtime often carry more significance than early-game production.
This game demonstrated that perfectly.
Rams vs Bears Player Stats Summary
| Player | Team | Key Production |
| Matthew Stafford | Rams | 20/42, 258 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT |
| Kyren Williams | Rams | 21 carries, 87 yards, 2 TD |
| Colby Parkinson | Rams | 3 receptions, 56 yards |
| Cobie Durant | Rams | 2 interceptions, 14 return yards |
| Kam Curl | Rams | 1 interception, including overtime |
| Harrison Mevis | Rams | 2/2 FG, 2/2 XP, 8 points |
| Caleb Williams | Bears | 23/42, 257 yards, 2 TD, 3 INT |
| D’Andre Swift | Bears | 19 carries, 76 yards |
| Colston Loveland | Bears | 4 receptions, 56 yards |
| Cole Kmet | Bears | 14-yard game-tying TD reception |
| DJ Moore | Bears | 3-yard TD reception |
| Cairo Santos | Bears | 1/1 FG, 2/2 XP |
What Fantasy Football Players Can Learn From This Game
Although this was a playoff game rather than a fantasy-focused contest, the numbers offer several useful lessons.
Quarterback fantasy production can be misleading when game context changes.
Williams threw two touchdowns and gained 257 passing yards, but three interceptions severely damaged his overall value in formats that penalize turnovers.
Stafford had 258 yards but no touchdowns and therefore offered limited fantasy upside.
Kyren Williams was the clearest fantasy winner among the Rams’ offensive players because his two rushing touchdowns compensated for his moderate yardage total.
Cole Kmet also benefited from a late touchdown reception that completely changed the game.
The larger lesson is that touchdown opportunities can be more valuable than raw yardage when evaluating individual offensive performance.
What Coaches Can Learn From the Game
The game also illustrates an important coaching principle: defensive disruption does not always require sacks.
Chicago’s four sacks were impressive.
But Los Angeles’ three interceptions were more valuable.
A defense that cannot consistently reach the quarterback can still influence the game by disguising coverage, forcing difficult decisions, and creating turnover opportunities.
The Rams also demonstrated the importance of staying composed after losing a late lead.
After Kmet’s touchdown tied the game, Los Angeles did not allow the momentum shift to dictate overtime.
The Rams defense forced a turnover, and the offense then completed the job with a field goal.
That sequence showed strong situational resilience.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Rams vs Bears playoff game?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Chicago Bears 20-17 in overtime in the NFC Divisional Round on January 18, 2026. (ESPN.com)
How many passing yards did Matthew Stafford have?
Matthew Stafford completed 20 of 42 passes for 258 yards. He threw no touchdowns and no interceptions. (ESPN.com)
How many touchdowns did Caleb Williams throw?
Caleb Williams threw two touchdown passes, but he also threw three interceptions. (ESPN.com)
Who was the Rams’ leading rusher?
Kyren Williams led Los Angeles with 21 carries for 87 yards and two rushing touchdowns.
Who led the Bears in rushing?
D’Andre Swift led Chicago with 19 carries for 76 yards.
Who scored the game-winning points?
Harrison Mevis kicked a 42-yard field goal with 3:19 remaining in overtime to give the Rams a 20-17 victory. (ESPN.com)
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats show why playoff football cannot be judged by yardage alone.
Chicago ran for 160 yards, allowed no sacks, and received two touchdown passes from Caleb Williams. The Bears also produced 257 passing yards and nearly completed another dramatic comeback.
Los Angeles, however, made the critical plays.
Kyren Williams scored twice. Matthew Stafford protected the football. Cobie Durant intercepted Williams twice. Kam Curl produced the decisive overtime interception. Harrison Mevis then converted the 42-yard field goal that ended the game.
The Rams did not dominate statistically.
They won because their most important players delivered at the most important moments.
That is ultimately what makes this matchup such an interesting case study in playoff football. The box score shows a close game between two competitive teams, but the deeper player-level analysis shows that turnovers, touchdown efficiency, defensive opportunism, and late-game execution determined the outcome.
