Washington Wizards vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats
The Washington Wizards vs Charlotte Hornets match player stats from the December 2025 meeting tell a clear story about how Charlotte turned a competitive first half into a convincing 126-109 victory. The Hornets finished with better shooting, far more assists, stronger three-point production, fewer turnovers, and a balanced scoring attack that Washington could not contain after halftime.
Played at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, the game featured several notable individual performances. LaMelo Ball led all Charlotte scorers with 23 points, while Brandon Miller added 20 and Kon Knueppel scored 19. Moussa Diabate was especially important on the glass, collecting 18 rebounds. Miles Bridges and Ball each recorded nine assists, giving Charlotte a major advantage in ball movement.
For Washington, Khris Middleton led the team with 16 points. Marvin Bagley III scored 15, while CJ McCollum and Bilal Coulibaly each finished with 14. Alex Sarr grabbed 11 rebounds and Kyshawn George recorded six assists.
The final score was Charlotte 126, Washington 109, but the score alone does not explain why the game moved so strongly in the Hornets’ favor. The deeper numbers show that Charlotte won the possession battle, generated more efficient offense, and became increasingly effective as the game progressed.
Washington Wizards vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats at a Glance
| Category | Washington Wizards | Charlotte Hornets |
| Final Score | 109 | 126 |
| Field Goals | 40-97 | 42-93 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 41.2% | 45.2% |
| Three-Pointers | 10-35 | 20-50 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 28.6% | 40.0% |
| Free Throws | 19-23 | 22-27 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 82.6% | 81.5% |
| Rebounds | 49 | 51 |
| Assists | 22 | 35 |
| Turnovers | 6 | 4 |
| Steals | 3 | 3 |
| Blocks | 7 | 6 |
Charlotte’s advantage was not based on one statistical category. The Hornets were better in several areas at the same time. They made twice as many three-pointers, produced 13 more assists, grabbed two more rebounds, and committed two fewer turnovers.
That combination created a significant offensive advantage.
Game Result and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
Charlotte won 126-109 after Washington opened the game with a strong first quarter.
The Wizards scored 31 points in the opening period while Charlotte managed 24. Washington therefore entered the second quarter with a seven-point advantage.
The momentum changed quickly.
First Quarter: Washington Starts Fast
Washington’s 31-point opening quarter showed that the Wizards were capable of creating offense against Charlotte’s defense. The Wizards eventually finished the game with 109 points, so their early scoring was not the problem by itself.
Charlotte, however, remained within striking distance.
The Hornets scored 24 points in the opening quarter and avoided allowing the Wizards to build an overwhelming lead.
Second Quarter: Charlotte Takes Control
The second quarter became the turning point.
Charlotte scored 38 points while Washington scored 34. That reduced Washington’s advantage and put the Hornets in a much stronger position heading into halftime.
At the half, Washington still had the edge, but Charlotte had clearly improved its offensive rhythm.
This was important because Charlotte did not need a dramatic defensive shutdown to change the game. Instead, the Hornets increased their scoring efficiency and ball movement.
Third Quarter: The Lead Changes Hands
The third quarter was where Charlotte began to take firm control.
The Hornets scored 30 points compared with Washington’s 25. That five-point advantage flipped the overall momentum and gave Charlotte a lead that could be carried into the final period.
Charlotte’s combination of perimeter shooting and passing became increasingly difficult for Washington to handle.
Fourth Quarter: Charlotte Pulls Away
The fourth quarter produced the clearest separation.
Charlotte scored 34 points while Washington managed only 19.
A 15-point fourth-quarter advantage turned what had been a competitive game into a 17-point Hornets victory.
The final-quarter performance also explains why looking only at the halftime score would be misleading. Charlotte became much more effective as the game progressed, while Washington’s offensive output declined sharply.
Charlotte Hornets Player Stats
Charlotte’s offensive success came from a group effort, although LaMelo Ball and Brandon Miller were the leading scorers.
LaMelo Ball
LaMelo Ball led Charlotte with 23 points.
He shot 7-for-12 from the field, including 4-for-9 from three-point range. He also made 5 of his 6 free-throw attempts.
Ball added nine assists, two rebounds, one steal, and one block.
His nine assists were tied for the team lead with Miles Bridges.
The combination of scoring and playmaking was particularly valuable because Charlotte did not depend entirely on individual isolation scoring. Ball helped create opportunities for teammates while still providing efficient scoring of his own.
His 58.3% field-goal shooting was one of the strongest efficiency marks among Charlotte’s major offensive contributors.
Brandon Miller
Brandon Miller finished with 20 points.
He made 8 of 17 field-goal attempts and converted four of his 10 three-point attempts.
Miller also contributed four rebounds, four assists, and two blocks.
His four made three-pointers were an important part of Charlotte’s perimeter attack. Washington made 10 threes as a team, while Miller alone accounted for four of Charlotte’s 20.
Miller’s 20 points also gave Charlotte a second high-level scoring option alongside Ball.
Kon Knueppel
Kon Knueppel scored 19 points and shot 7-for-15 from the field.
His most important contribution came from long range. Knueppel made five of nine three-point attempts, giving him a 55.6% three-point shooting rate.
That efficiency helped stretch Washington’s defense.
When a team can create quality three-point opportunities while also having players capable of attacking the paint, opposing defenders face difficult choices. Charlotte benefited from that balance throughout the game.
Moussa Diabate
Moussa Diabate produced one of the most impressive statistical performances of the game even though he was not Charlotte’s leading scorer.
He finished with 18 rebounds and 12 points.
Diabate was perfect from the field, going 6-for-6.
His rebounding total was the highest of any player in the game.
He collected eight offensive rebounds and 10 defensive rebounds, giving Charlotte a major presence around the basket.
The offensive rebounds were especially valuable because they created additional possessions. Even when Charlotte missed a shot, Diabate’s activity gave the Hornets opportunities to recover the ball and extend possessions.
His 18-rebound performance is one of the clearest reasons Charlotte finished with 51 total rebounds.
Miles Bridges
Miles Bridges scored 10 points but made a major contribution as a passer and rebounder.
He recorded nine assists and nine rebounds, falling just one rebound short of a triple-double.
Bridges shot 4-for-13 from the field and struggled from three-point range, making only one of six attempts. However, his playmaking helped offset the shooting inefficiency.
His nine assists were tied with Ball for the team lead.
This is a good example of why evaluating a player’s performance only through points can produce an incomplete picture.
Tidjane Salaun
Tidjane Salaun added 11 points, six rebounds, one assist, one steal, and one block.
He shot 4-for-11 from the field and made one three-pointer.
His contributions helped Charlotte maintain scoring depth beyond its primary players.
Sion James and Collin Sexton
Sion James finished with 13 points and was perfect from the free-throw line, making all eight attempts.
Collin Sexton added 12 points and shot 6-for-6 from the free-throw line.
Those contributions were useful because Charlotte had multiple players capable of adding points without forcing the offense through only Ball or Miller.
Washington Wizards Player Stats
Washington received several useful individual performances, but the team’s overall efficiency did not match Charlotte’s production.
Khris Middleton
Khris Middleton was Washington’s leading scorer with 16 points.
He made five of 10 field-goal attempts and converted all five of his free throws.
Middleton also recorded one rebound and one assist.
His 50% field-goal shooting was efficient, but Washington needed more scoring from several other high-volume players to keep pace with Charlotte.
Marvin Bagley III
Marvin Bagley III scored 15 points.
He was one of Washington’s most efficient offensive players, shooting 5-for-7 from the field.
He also made five of six free throws.
Bagley added three rebounds and one assist.
His 71.4% field-goal percentage was excellent, but his limited shot volume meant that Washington did not receive enough overall offensive production from that efficiency.
CJ McCollum
CJ McCollum finished with 14 points, six rebounds, and four assists.
He made five of 17 field-goal attempts and one of five three-point attempts.
His 29.4% shooting from the field was one of the more difficult aspects of Washington’s offensive performance.
McCollum was involved heavily in the offense, but Charlotte’s defensive pressure and the difficulty of his shot attempts prevented that volume from translating into efficient scoring.
Bilal Coulibaly
Bilal Coulibaly also scored 14 points.
He shot 5-for-13 from the field and made three of nine three-point attempts.
Coulibaly contributed five rebounds, one assist, and one block.
His three made threes helped Washington stay competitive from outside, but Charlotte’s 20 made three-pointers created a major statistical gap.
Alex Sarr
Alex Sarr was Washington’s leading rebounder with 11 rebounds.
He also recorded four blocks, one assist, and one steal.
Sarr scored seven points while shooting 2-for-6 from the field.
His defensive activity was notable. Four blocks represented the highest individual block total in the game.
However, Charlotte’s ability to generate offense from several positions limited the impact of those defensive plays.
Kyshawn George
Kyshawn George led Washington in assists with six.
He played 31:21 and contributed two points, two rebounds, and six assists.
His passing was useful, but his shooting was a major challenge. George made only one of nine field-goal attempts.
That meant Charlotte could place additional defensive attention on other Washington scorers without facing a consistently efficient scoring threat from George.
Why Charlotte Won the Game
The biggest lesson from the Washington Wizards vs Charlotte Hornets match player stats is that Charlotte won through offensive efficiency and ball movement rather than relying on one superstar performance.
Several numbers stand out.
Charlotte Made Twice as Many Three-Pointers
Charlotte made 20 three-pointers on 50 attempts.
Washington made only 10 on 35 attempts.
That produced a 30-point advantage in made three-point baskets alone.
Even though Charlotte attempted 15 more threes, its 40% accuracy was also significantly better than Washington’s 28.6%.
This was arguably the most important shooting difference in the game.
Charlotte Shared the Ball Better
Charlotte recorded 35 assists.
Washington recorded 22.
The 13-assist difference demonstrates a major contrast in offensive organization.
Charlotte generated more baskets through passing, while Washington had fewer assisted scoring opportunities.
Ball and Bridges each finished with nine assists, meaning they collectively accounted for 18 of Charlotte’s 35 assists.
That playmaking distribution made Charlotte’s offense harder to predict.
Turnovers Were Low for Both Teams
Washington committed six turnovers.
Charlotte committed only four.
Neither team gave the ball away frequently, but Charlotte still gained an advantage.
With just four turnovers, the Hornets protected their possessions extremely well.
The combination of 35 assists and four turnovers is particularly impressive because it suggests that Charlotte maintained high-quality ball movement without sacrificing possession security.
Rebounding Was Close
Charlotte won the rebounding battle 51-49.
This was not a dominant difference.
Washington actually received a strong rebounding contribution from Alex Sarr, while Justin Champagnie collected nine rebounds and Marvin Bagley III added three.
Charlotte’s biggest advantage came from Diabate.
His 18 rebounds helped the Hornets secure both defensive possessions and additional opportunities after missed shots.
Shooting Efficiency Tells the Story
The overall field-goal numbers show Charlotte with a 45.2% shooting percentage compared with Washington’s 41.2%.
That four-percentage-point difference matters, but the three-point numbers make the gap even clearer.
Charlotte:
- 42-for-93 overall
- 20-for-50 from three
- 45.2% from the field
- 40% from three
Washington:
- 40-for-97 overall
- 10-for-35 from three
- 41.2% from the field
- 28.6% from three
Washington actually attempted four more total field goals.
The problem was conversion.
Charlotte scored more points despite taking fewer overall field-goal attempts because the Hornets converted a higher percentage of their shots and produced a much stronger three-point return.
This is an important distinction when evaluating basketball statistics. Shot volume alone does not guarantee offensive success.
Free-Throw Shooting Was Not the Difference
Both teams were effective from the free-throw line.
Washington made 19 of 23 attempts for 82.6%.
Charlotte made 22 of 27 for 81.5%.
The percentages were almost identical.
Charlotte did make three more free throws, but the free-throw line was not responsible for the 17-point final margin.
The major differences came from three-point shooting, assists, overall field-goal efficiency, and the fourth-quarter scoring gap.
The Fourth Quarter Decided the Result
The final period deserves special attention.
Charlotte scored 34 points.
Washington scored 19.
That 15-point difference was larger than the final margin’s difference from the halftime position.
It demonstrated that Charlotte did not merely survive a close game. The Hornets finished with a decisive offensive surge.
Washington’s scoring fell from 34 points in the second quarter to 25 in the third and then 19 in the fourth.
Charlotte went in the opposite direction.
The Hornets scored 24 in the first, 38 in the second, 30 in the third, and 34 in the fourth.
That sustained scoring pressure eventually overwhelmed Washington.
What the Advanced Box Score Tells Us
A traditional box score can provide the basic facts, but the distribution of the numbers offers deeper insight.
Charlotte scored 126 points while committing only four turnovers.
Washington scored 109 while committing six turnovers.
Charlotte also recorded 35 assists on 42 made field goals.
That means a very large share of Charlotte’s made baskets came through assisted offense.
Washington recorded 22 assists on 40 made field goals.
The difference suggests that Charlotte created a more connected offensive attack.
Another useful comparison is three-point production.
Charlotte’s 20 made threes accounted for 60 points.
Washington’s 10 made threes accounted for 30 points.
That 30-point difference was partially offset by Washington’s two additional made two-point baskets, but not enough to overcome Charlotte’s perimeter advantage.
Key Individual Matchups
LaMelo Ball vs Washington’s Perimeter Defense
Ball’s 23 points and nine assists made him one of the most influential players on the floor.
Washington needed to control his scoring while also preventing him from creating open shots for teammates.
That proved difficult.
Ball shot 58.3% from the field and 44.4% from three.
His nine assists also demonstrate that simply limiting his scoring would not have been enough. Charlotte had other offensive weapons ready to capitalize on defensive attention.
Brandon Miller vs Washington’s Wing Defense
Miller’s 20 points came on efficient shooting.
He made eight of 17 shots and four of 10 threes.
His ability to contribute both inside and from the perimeter gave Charlotte another scoring option.
When combined with Ball’s performance, Miller’s 20 points helped create the 43-point scoring combination that drove Charlotte’s offense.
Moussa Diabate vs Washington’s Frontcourt
Diabate’s 18 rebounds were a major factor.
His six-for-six shooting also meant that Washington could not ignore him offensively.
His eight offensive rebounds were particularly damaging because second-chance opportunities can change the flow of a game even when initial shooting is missed.
Washington’s Positive Takeaways
Despite the loss, Washington had several positive statistical developments.
First, the Wizards committed only six turnovers.
Second, they shot 82.6% from the free-throw line.
Third, they collected 49 rebounds.
Fourth, several players shot efficiently in limited roles.
Bagley shot 71.4% from the field, Middleton shot 50%, and Justin Champagnie also shot 71.4%.
The challenge was turning those individual efficient stretches into a consistently productive team offense.
Washington also received seven blocks, led by Sarr’s four.
The defensive activity around the rim was therefore encouraging even though the overall result was not.
Charlotte’s Most Important Team Strengths
Charlotte’s biggest strengths were balance and efficiency.
The Hornets had:
- Two players with 20 or more points
- Three players with at least 19 points
- Two players with nine assists
- One player with 18 rebounds
- 20 made three-pointers
- 35 assists
- Only four turnovers
That distribution made it difficult for Washington to focus on one particular player.
If defenders concentrated on Ball, Miller and Knueppel could make perimeter shots.
If Washington focused on the perimeter, Diabate could attack the glass.
If Charlotte’s primary scorers faced additional pressure, Bridges could facilitate the offense.
That balance is one of the clearest reasons Charlotte controlled the second half.
Team Records and Season Context
The game also had significance within the teams’ respective seasons.
Washington entered with a 5-23 record, including a 3-13 mark on the road.
Charlotte entered at 10-20, with a 7-8 home record.
The result moved Charlotte to 10-20 and left Washington at 5-23 according to the official game information.
The season series also stood at 2-0 in Charlotte’s favor at this point.
For readers tracking team development, these details provide context around the individual numbers. A single game can reveal tactical strengths, but the surrounding record helps explain the broader competitive environment.
Attendance and Game Information
The matchup was played at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Attendance was 18,679.
The officiating crew consisted of J.B. DeRosa, Phenizee Ransom, and Matt Myers.
The official NBA box score records the game as Washington’s 109-126 loss to Charlotte. Official NBA box score
One date detail is worth clarifying for readers comparing databases. The official NBA game record identifies the contest as Tuesday, December 23, 2025, while the game information displays December 24 in its date and time presentation. For statistical reference, the official box score is the best source for the completed game data.
Full Washington Wizards Statistical Leaders
Washington’s main statistical leaders from the game were:
- Points: Khris Middleton, 16
- Rebounds: Alex Sarr, 11
- Assists: Kyshawn George, 6
- Blocks: Alex Sarr, 4
- Three-pointers: Bilal Coulibaly, 3
- Field-goal percentage among players with multiple attempts: Marvin Bagley III and Justin Champagnie, 71.4%
Several players contributed double-digit scoring, including Middleton, Bagley, McCollum, Coulibaly, and Champagnie.
The issue was not a complete lack of individual production. Instead, Charlotte’s collective efficiency was stronger.
Full Charlotte Statistical Leaders
Charlotte’s leading statistical contributors were:
- Points: LaMelo Ball, 23
- Rebounds: Moussa Diabate, 18
- Assists: LaMelo Ball and Miles Bridges, 9 each
- Three-pointers: Kon Knueppel, 5
- Blocks: Brandon Miller, 2
- Steals: LaMelo Ball, Tidjane Salaun, and Sion James, 1 each
The statistical profile shows a team that received meaningful contributions in nearly every major category.
What Fans and Analysts Should Take From the Numbers
The most useful way to interpret this game is not simply to say that Charlotte scored 126 points.
The deeper conclusion is that Charlotte created a sustainable offensive structure.
The Hornets combined:
- High-volume three-point shooting
- Efficient three-point conversion
- Strong passing
- Low turnovers
- Offensive rebounding
- Multiple scoring options
Washington had several good individual performances, but its offense lacked the same consistency.
The Wizards also had difficulty matching Charlotte’s perimeter efficiency.
When a team gives up 20 made three-pointers while making only 10 itself, it becomes extremely difficult to win without a major advantage elsewhere.
Washington did not have that counterbalance.
Why Player Stats Matter Beyond the Final Score
Player statistics are most useful when they explain how the game was won.
A player scoring 20 points can have a very different impact depending on how many shots were required.
A player with 10 points can also be highly valuable if those points come with strong rebounding, defense, and efficient passing.
That is why Diabate’s 18 rebounds, Bridges’ nine assists, and Ball’s nine assists are just as important to understanding Charlotte’s win as Ball’s 23 points.
Similarly, Sarr’s 11 rebounds and four blocks deserve attention even though he scored only seven points.
The full box score gives a more complete picture than the scoring column alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points for the Hornets?
LaMelo Ball led Charlotte with 23 points. He also recorded nine assists and shot 58.3% from the field.
Who led the Wizards in scoring?
Khris Middleton was Washington’s leading scorer with 16 points. He shot 5-for-10 from the field and made all five of his free throws.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Moussa Diabate led all players with 18 rebounds. He also scored 12 points while shooting 6-for-6 from the field.
How many three-pointers did Charlotte make?
Charlotte made 20 of 50 three-point attempts, shooting 40% from beyond the arc.
How many assists did the Hornets record?
Charlotte finished with 35 assists, compared with 22 for Washington. LaMelo Ball and Miles Bridges each recorded nine assists.
What was the final score?
The Charlotte Hornets defeated the Washington Wizards 126-109.
Conclusion
The Washington Wizards vs Charlotte Hornets match player stats reveal a game that became increasingly one-sided as the second half progressed. Washington competed well early, but Charlotte’s combination of perimeter shooting, passing, rebounding, and efficient scoring eventually created separation.
LaMelo Ball led the Hornets with 23 points and nine assists, while Brandon Miller supplied 20 points and Kon Knueppel added 19. Moussa Diabate’s 18 rebounds gave Charlotte a major interior advantage, and Miles Bridges contributed nine assists and nine rebounds.
Washington received 16 points from Khris Middleton, 15 from Marvin Bagley III, and 14 each from CJ McCollum and Bilal Coulibaly. Alex Sarr provided 11 rebounds and four blocks, while Kyshawn George led the Wizards with six assists.
The decisive numbers were Charlotte’s 20 made three-pointers, 35 assists, 51 rebounds, and only four turnovers. Washington’s 10 made threes, 22 assists, and 41.2% field-goal shooting were not enough to match that overall efficiency.
The 34-19 fourth quarter ultimately settled the contest. Charlotte’s ability to maintain offensive pressure late in the game transformed a competitive matchup into a 17-point victory.
