New York Jets vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats

New York Jets vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats

The New York Jets vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats from November 23, 2025, tell the story of a 23-10 Baltimore victory built on defensive pressure, effective red-zone execution, and Derrick Henry’s two rushing touchdowns. Although the Jets produced 222 passing yards through Tyrod Taylor and found some success through Breece Hall, they struggled to turn their offensive production into points. Baltimore, meanwhile, used a balanced rushing attack and a disruptive defensive performance to control the second half at M&T Bank Stadium.

The final score was Baltimore Ravens 23, New York Jets 10. The game featured several important individual performances, including Henry’s 64 rushing yards and two touchdowns, Hall’s combined rushing and receiving contributions, and Roquan Smith’s team-leading 11 tackles. The Ravens also recorded three sacks and an interception, creating problems for the Jets throughout the contest.

This breakdown examines the complete player statistics, passing performances, rushing production, receiving contributions, defensive numbers, special teams, scoring progression, and tactical factors that determined the result. It also explains what the numbers reveal beyond the final scoreboard.

Table of Contents

Match Overview: New York Jets vs Baltimore Ravens

The November 23 matchup brought together two teams with different objectives and contrasting performances. Baltimore entered the game looking to improve its position with a 5-5 record context reflected in a final postgame record of 6-5, while New York was attempting to find consistency during a difficult season.

The Ravens eventually secured a 13-point victory, improving their home record to 3-3. The Jets dropped to 2-9 overall and 1-4 away from home.

Game Information

Match Detail Information
Match New York Jets vs Baltimore Ravens
Competition National Football League
Date November 23, 2025
Venue M&T Bank Stadium
Away Team New York Jets
Home Team Baltimore Ravens
Final Score Ravens 23, Jets 10
Match Status Final
Jets Record After Match 2-9
Ravens Record After Match 6-5
Jets Away Record 1-4
Ravens Home Record 3-3
Game ID 401772782
Statistical Source ESPN

The final result reflected Baltimore’s ability to make important plays when opportunities appeared. The Jets had some productive offensive sequences, but Baltimore’s defense limited their scoring opportunities and prevented them from building momentum.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score

Quarter New York Jets Baltimore Ravens
First Quarter 0 0
Second Quarter 7 3
Third Quarter 0 14
Fourth Quarter 3 6
Final 10 23

The opening quarter ended without either team scoring. New York then moved ahead with seven points in the second quarter, but Baltimore answered with a field goal to make the score 7-3 at halftime.

The third quarter became the decisive period. Baltimore scored 14 unanswered points, moving from a four-point deficit to a 17-7 advantage. The Ravens added another six points in the final quarter, while New York managed only a field goal.

This scoring progression highlights how Baltimore changed the game’s direction after halftime.

New York Jets vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats: Complete Passing Breakdown

Quarterback performance was an important part of the matchup because both teams relied on their passing games to create opportunities for their receivers.

Tyrod Taylor started at quarterback for New York, while Lamar Jackson directed Baltimore’s offense. Neither quarterback produced a passing touchdown, but their overall contributions differed in terms of passing volume, rushing involvement, and offensive results.

Tyrod Taylor Passing Statistics

Tyrod Taylor completed 17 of 28 passing attempts for 222 yards and one touchdown. He averaged 7.9 yards per attempt and recorded one interception.

Passing Statistic Tyrod Taylor
Completions 17
Attempts 28
Completion Percentage 60.7%
Passing Yards 222
Yards Per Attempt 7.9
Passing Touchdowns 1
Interceptions 1
Times Sacked 3
Sack Yards Lost 18
Total QBR 66.1
Passer Rating 82.7

Taylor’s passing performance contained several positive elements. His 222 passing yards demonstrated that New York could move the ball through the air, while his 7.9 yards per attempt indicated that the offense was not limited entirely to short completions.

His touchdown pass also helped the Jets establish their only touchdown of the game.

However, the interception and three sacks reduced the effectiveness of his overall performance. Against a defense that generated seven quarterback hits, maintaining possession and avoiding negative plays became especially important.

The Ravens made Taylor work for his opportunities. Their defensive front created pressure, while the secondary helped prevent New York from converting its passing production into multiple touchdowns.

Lamar Jackson Passing Statistics

Lamar Jackson completed 13 of 23 attempts for 153 passing yards. He averaged 6.7 yards per attempt and did not throw a passing touchdown or interception.

Passing Statistic Lamar Jackson
Completions 13
Attempts 23
Completion Percentage 56.5%
Passing Yards 153
Yards Per Attempt 6.7
Passing Touchdowns 0
Interceptions 0
Times Sacked 1
Sack Yards Lost 10
Total QBR 34.7
Passer Rating 76.9

Jackson’s passing numbers were not particularly impressive when considered independently. His completion percentage was below Taylor’s, and he finished with fewer passing yards.

However, quarterback evaluation requires more than comparing passing totals.

Baltimore established a productive rushing attack that allowed Jackson to operate within a broader offensive structure. The Ravens scored twice on the ground, reducing the need to depend on passing touchdowns.

Jackson also avoided interceptions, which helped Baltimore maintain possession and protect its lead.

His rushing contributions provided another dimension to the offense, even though his individual rushing production was modest in this particular matchup.

Quarterback Comparison

Category Tyrod Taylor Lamar Jackson
Completions 17 13
Attempts 28 23
Completion Rate 60.7% 56.5%
Passing Yards 222 153
Yards Per Attempt 7.9 6.7
Touchdowns 1 0
Interceptions 1 0
Sacks 3 1
Passer Rating 82.7 76.9

Taylor led the two quarterbacks in passing yards, completions, completion percentage, and passer rating. Jackson recorded fewer passing yards but avoided an interception and benefited from Baltimore’s two rushing touchdowns.

The important distinction is that individual passing statistics do not necessarily determine the winning quarterback performance. Baltimore scored 23 points through a combination of rushing touchdowns and field goals, while New York managed only 10 points.

A statistical clarification: The supplied player passing figures list Taylor with 222 passing yards and Jackson with 153. The team passing summaries list 204 and 143 yards, respectively. These figures reflect the distinction between gross player passing production and net passing yardage after sack losses. They should not be treated as contradictory passing totals.

Rushing Statistics: Derrick Henry Leads Baltimore’s Ground Attack

Baltimore’s rushing production was one of the defining elements of the game.

The Ravens recorded 98 rushing yards on 34 attempts and scored two rushing touchdowns. New York finished with 78 rushing yards on 26 attempts and failed to score a rushing touchdown.

Although the difference in total rushing yardage was relatively small, Baltimore’s ability to finish drives made the ground game particularly important.

Derrick Henry’s Rushing Performance

Derrick Henry led the Ravens with 21 carries for 64 yards and two touchdowns.

Statistic Derrick Henry
Carries 21
Rushing Yards 64
Yards Per Carry 3.0
Rushing Touchdowns 2
Longest Run 17 yards

Henry did not produce an exceptionally high rushing average, but his touchdowns were extremely valuable.

His two scoring runs accounted for 12 of Baltimore’s 23 points before the extra points. Those touchdowns helped Baltimore establish control during the third quarter and maintain its advantage in the final period.

This performance demonstrates why rushing efficiency cannot always be evaluated through yards per carry alone.

A running back who gains relatively modest yardage but consistently converts important opportunities can have a substantial impact on the scoreboard.

Henry’s workload also showed Baltimore’s commitment to running the football. His 21 carries represented a significant portion of the team’s 34 rushing attempts.

Lamar Jackson’s Rushing Contribution

Jackson added seven carries for 11 rushing yards.

Statistic Lamar Jackson
Carries 7
Rushing Yards 11
Yards Per Carry 1.6
Rushing Touchdowns 0
Longest Run Not specified

His rushing production was limited compared with some of his more explosive performances, but the threat of a mobile quarterback remained part of Baltimore’s offensive structure.

Jackson’s movement can force defenders to account for additional possibilities, even when his final rushing numbers are modest.

Other Ravens Rushing Performances

Player Carries Yards Average Touchdowns
Derrick Henry 21 64 3.0 2
Lamar Jackson 7 11 1.6 0
Zay Flowers 2 11 5.5 0
Keaton Mitchell 2 10 5.0 0
Mark Andrews 2 2 1.0 0
Team Total 34 98 2.9 2

Zay Flowers and Keaton Mitchell contributed additional rushing yardage through limited opportunities.

Flowers gained 11 yards on two attempts, while Mitchell recorded 10 yards on two carries.

These contributions helped Baltimore distribute its rushing workload rather than depending exclusively on Henry.

New York Jets Rushing Statistics

Breece Hall led the Jets in rushing attempts and yardage, recording 16 carries for 44 yards.

Player Carries Rushing Yards Average Touchdowns
Breece Hall 16 44 2.8 0
Tyrod Taylor 5 19 3.8 0
Arian Smith 1 8 8.0 0
Isaiah Davis 4 7 1.8 0
Team Total 26 78 3.0 0

Hall received the largest rushing workload but struggled to produce consistent yardage.

His 2.8 yards per carry limited New York’s ability to maintain favorable down-and-distance situations.

Taylor added 19 yards on five attempts, giving the Jets another rushing option. Arian Smith recorded eight yards on his single attempt, while Isaiah Davis finished with seven yards on four carries.

Rushing Comparison

Team Statistic Jets Ravens
Rushing Attempts 26 34
Rushing Yards 78 98
Yards Per Carry 3.0 2.9
Rushing Touchdowns 0 2

An interesting detail is that the Jets actually averaged slightly more yards per carry than Baltimore.

However, Baltimore recorded eight additional rushing attempts and two touchdowns.

This shows the difference between average efficiency and scoring effectiveness. The Ravens did not need a significantly higher rushing average to gain an advantage. Their ability to finish possessions with touchdowns was more important.

Receiving Statistics: Breece Hall and Zay Flowers Lead Their Teams

The receiving statistics provide another important perspective on the contest.

New York generated 222 receiving yards, with Breece Hall and John Metchie III making significant contributions. Baltimore recorded 153 receiving yards, led by Zay Flowers.

The Jets had more receiving yardage, but Baltimore’s offensive balance and defensive performance helped compensate for the difference.

Breece Hall’s Receiving Performance

Breece Hall was one of New York’s most productive offensive players.

He recorded four receptions for 75 yards on four targets, averaging 18.8 yards per reception.

Statistic Breece Hall
Receptions 4
Targets 4
Receiving Yards 75
Average 18.8
Receiving Touchdowns 0
Longest Reception 40 yards

Hall’s 40-yard reception was particularly important because it demonstrated his ability to create explosive plays through the passing game.

His receiving contribution also complemented his 44 rushing yards.

Combining his rushing and receiving production, Hall finished with 119 yards from scrimmage.

That figure made him one of the most productive offensive players in the matchup, despite New York’s defeat.

However, individual production did not translate into enough scoring opportunities. The Jets needed more successful plays from their supporting offensive players to turn those yards into additional points.

John Metchie III Provides New York’s Touchdown

John Metchie III was another important contributor to the Jets’ passing offense.

He recorded six receptions for 65 yards and one touchdown on seven targets.

Statistic John Metchie III
Receptions 6
Targets 7
Receiving Yards 65
Average 10.8
Touchdowns 1
Longest Reception 19 yards

Metchie’s six receptions gave Taylor a dependable receiving option.

His touchdown was particularly significant because it accounted for New York’s only offensive touchdown of the game.

His performance also demonstrated the value of consistent short and intermediate receptions. While Hall generated more yardage per catch, Metchie provided more completed receptions and finished the team’s scoring play.

Other Jets Receiving Contributions

Player Receptions Targets Receiving Yards Average Touchdowns
Breece Hall 4 4 75 18.8 0
John Metchie III 6 7 65 10.8 1
Adonai Mitchell 2 7 42 21.0 0
Mason Taylor 3 5 21 7.0 0
Andrew Beck 1 1 10 10.0 0
Allen Lazard 1 3 9 9.0 0
Team Total 17 27 222 13.1 1

Adonai Mitchell averaged an impressive 21 yards per reception, gaining 42 yards on two catches.

His performance provided another example of New York’s ability to create explosive receiving plays.

Mason Taylor added three receptions for 21 yards, while Andrew Beck and Allen Lazard contributed one reception each.

Despite having multiple players involved in the passing attack, the Jets did not find the end zone often enough to challenge Baltimore’s lead.

Zay Flowers Leads the Ravens

Zay Flowers was Baltimore’s leading receiver, recording five receptions for 58 yards on six targets.

Statistic Zay Flowers
Receptions 5
Targets 6
Receiving Yards 58
Average 11.6
Receiving Touchdowns 0
Longest Reception 20 yards

Flowers provided Jackson with a consistent receiving option.

His five catches accounted for a substantial portion of Baltimore’s 153 receiving yards.

He also contributed 11 rushing yards on two attempts, demonstrating his involvement in multiple offensive roles.

Although Flowers did not score a receiving touchdown, his contributions helped Baltimore maintain offensive flexibility.

Other Ravens Receiving Performances

Player Receptions Targets Receiving Yards Average Touchdowns
Zay Flowers 5 6 58 11.6 0
Devontez Walker 1 1 30 30.0 0
Derrick Henry 2 2 24 12.0 0
DeAndre Hopkins 2 3 13 6.5 0
Isaiah Likely 1 3 10 10.0 0
Mark Andrews 1 3 9 9.0 0
Keaton Mitchell 1 1 9 9.0 0
Tylan Wallace 0 0 0 0.0 0
Team Total 13 20 153 11.8 0

Devontez Walker produced one of the most efficient individual receiving performances for Baltimore.

He caught his only target for 30 yards, giving him an average of 30 yards per reception.

Derrick Henry also contributed through the passing game with two receptions for 24 yards.

DeAndre Hopkins, Isaiah Likely, Mark Andrews, and Keaton Mitchell provided additional receiving options.

The distribution of these receptions demonstrates that Baltimore did not rely entirely on one receiver to move the football.

Receiving Comparison

Category Jets Ravens
Receptions 17 13
Targets 27 20
Receiving Yards 222 153
Yards Per Reception 13.1 11.8
Receiving Touchdowns 1 0
Longest Reception 40 yards 30 yards

New York finished with 69 more receiving yards than Baltimore.

The Jets also recorded four more receptions.

However, the receiving comparison must be considered alongside the scoring results. New York’s advantage in passing production did not overcome Baltimore’s two rushing touchdowns and defensive pressure.

This is an important lesson when analyzing football statistics: more receiving yards do not automatically produce more points.

Defensive Player Stats: Baltimore’s Defense Controls the Game

Baltimore’s defensive performance was one of the strongest reasons behind the victory.

The Ravens recorded three sacks, four tackles for loss, two passes defended, and seven quarterback hits.

They also intercepted Tyrod Taylor once.

New York’s defense recorded one sack and three passes defended but could not prevent Baltimore from scoring two rushing touchdowns.

Baltimore Ravens Defensive Statistics

Defensive Category Team Total
Total Tackles 72
Solo Tackles 35
Sacks 3
Tackles for Loss 4
Passes Defended 2
Quarterback Hits 7
Interceptions 1
Defensive Touchdowns 0

These numbers reveal how Baltimore applied pressure without depending exclusively on interceptions or defensive touchdowns.

Seven quarterback hits indicate that the Ravens repeatedly disrupted New York’s passing rhythm.

Three sacks also created negative yardage situations that made it harder for the Jets to maintain drives.

Roquan Smith Leads Baltimore’s Defense

Roquan Smith led Baltimore with 11 total tackles, including six solo tackles.

Player Total Tackles Solo Tackles
Roquan Smith 11 6
Kyle Hamilton 10 6
Teddye Buchanan 8 5
Mike Green 5 2
Travis Jones 5 2
Marlon Humphrey 4 3
Dre’Mont Jones 4 2

Smith’s 11 tackles placed him at the top of Baltimore’s defensive statistics.

His contribution was important in limiting New York’s ability to sustain offensive possessions.

Kyle Hamilton also delivered a strong performance with 10 tackles, including six solo stops.

Teddye Buchanan recorded eight tackles, giving Baltimore another productive defensive contributor.

The combined tackle production from these players helped the Ravens limit the Jets’ running game and contain their offensive opportunities.

Dre’Mont Jones Makes an Impact in the Pass Rush

Dre’Mont Jones was particularly productive as a pass rusher.

He recorded:

  • Four total tackles.
  • Two solo tackles.
  • 1.5 sacks.
  • One tackle for loss.
  • One pass defended.
  • Two quarterback hits.

His 1.5 sacks accounted for half of Baltimore’s three team sacks.

The ability to create pressure from the defensive front was important because it forced Taylor to operate under difficult conditions.

When a quarterback faces repeated pressure, the offense can lose its timing. Receivers may have less time to complete routes, and running plays can become less effective when the defense controls the line of scrimmage.

Mike Green’s Defensive Contribution

Mike Green recorded five tackles, including two solo tackles.

He also contributed one sack, one tackle for loss, and two quarterback hits.

His performance added to Baltimore’s pass-rushing pressure.

Travis Jones and Marlon Humphrey also contributed through tackles and tackles for loss.

The combined defensive performance created a difficult environment for the Jets’ offensive line and quarterback.

New York Jets Defensive Statistics

Defensive Category Team Total
Total Tackles 70
Solo Tackles 26
Sacks 1
Tackles for Loss 2
Passes Defended 3
Quarterback Hits 1
Interceptions 0
Defensive Touchdowns 0

New York’s defense recorded 70 tackles, slightly fewer than Baltimore’s 72.

However, the larger difference appeared in the pass rush.

The Jets recorded only one sack and one quarterback hit, compared with Baltimore’s three sacks and seven quarterback hits.

This difference helps explain why the Ravens were able to create more disruption in important passing situations.

Jamien Sherwood Leads the Jets

Jamien Sherwood led New York with 13 total tackles and three solo tackles.

Player Total Tackles Solo Tackles Additional Contributions
Jamien Sherwood 13 3 None listed
Harrison Phillips 8 1 1 TFL, 1 PD
Quincy Williams 6 2 None listed
Tony Adams 6 2 1 PD
Jowon Briggs 5 2 1 sack, 1 TFL, 1 QB hit

Sherwood’s 13 tackles represented the highest individual tackle total from either team.

His involvement demonstrated the workload placed on New York’s defensive unit.

Harrison Phillips recorded eight tackles, while Quincy Williams and Tony Adams each contributed six.

Jowon Briggs was responsible for the Jets’ only sack.

His additional quarterback hit and tackle for loss showed that he provided some pressure despite the team’s limited overall pass-rushing production.

T.J. Tampa Records Baltimore’s Interception

T.J. Tampa recorded Baltimore’s only interception.

The interception came without any return yardage or a defensive touchdown, but it still represented an important defensive contribution.

Turnovers can change the direction of an NFL game because they remove an offensive possession and provide the opposing team with an opportunity to regain control.

New York did not record an interception against Jackson.

This created another statistical advantage for Baltimore, which finished the game with one interception compared with none for the Jets.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Turnovers were another important part of the statistical comparison.

The Jets recorded one fumble by Breece Hall, which they lost. Baltimore recorded one fumble by Lamar Jackson, but the Ravens recovered it.

Team Fumbles Fumbles Lost Interceptions Thrown Interceptions Recorded
New York Jets 1 1 1 0
Baltimore Ravens 1 0 0 1

New York finished with two recorded turnovers: one interception thrown by Taylor and one lost fumble by Hall.

Baltimore had one fumble but recovered it, avoiding a lost possession.

This difference matters because Baltimore protected the ball more effectively.

The Ravens’ defense also created the interception that gave their team an additional opportunity to control the game.

Why Turnover Margin Matters

Turnover margin is a useful way to understand the relationship between offensive mistakes and defensive takeaways.

In this matchup:

  • The Jets lost one fumble.
  • The Jets threw one interception.
  • Baltimore recovered its own fumble.
  • Baltimore intercepted one New York pass.

Baltimore therefore finished with a positive turnover margin of two.

That advantage helped the Ravens maintain control, especially when combined with their second-half scoring production.

Special Teams Statistics: Kicking, Punting and Returns

Special teams did not receive as much attention as the offensive and defensive performances, but they still contributed to the final result.

Baltimore’s Tyler Loop converted all three field-goal attempts, while New York’s Nick Folk made his only field-goal attempt.

The Ravens also received a strong punting performance from Jordan Stout.

Kicking Statistics

Statistic Nick Folk Tyler Loop
Field Goals Made 1 3
Field Goals Attempted 1 3
Field Goal Percentage 100% 100%
Longest Field Goal 42 yards 35 yards
Extra Points Made 1 2
Extra Points Attempted 1 2
Total Points 4 11

Tyler Loop scored 11 points for Baltimore through three field goals and two extra points.

His consistency gave the Ravens additional scoring opportunities when drives did not end with touchdowns.

Nick Folk converted a 42-yard field goal and an extra point, finishing with four points.

The difference in total kicking points was seven.

This was another area where Baltimore gained an advantage.

Punting Statistics

Statistic Austin McNamara Jordan Stout
Punts 4 4
Total Punting Yards 152 246
Average 38.0 61.5
Longest Punt 47 yards 74 yards
Touchbacks 1 0
Inside the 20 3 1

Jordan Stout averaged 61.5 yards per punt, compared with Austin McNamara’s 38.0.

Stout’s longest punt traveled 74 yards.

Although Baltimore recorded only one punt inside the 20-yard line, its average distance demonstrated the ability to generate significant field-position changes.

McNamara placed three punts inside the 20, showing that New York also had some success in its coverage and field-position strategy.

The two punters achieved different results, so average distance alone does not describe every aspect of their performances.

Kick Return Statistics

Team Returner Returns Yards Average Longest
Jets Isaiah Williams 4 122 30.5 38
Jets Kene Nwangwu 1 34 34.0 34
Ravens Keaton Mitchell 2 59 29.5 34
Ravens Justice Hill 1 27 27.0 27

New York recorded 156 total kick-return yards on five attempts, averaging 31.2 yards per return.

Baltimore recorded 86 yards on three attempts, averaging 28.7 yards.

Isaiah Williams was particularly productive for the Jets, gaining 122 yards across four returns.

These returns helped New York improve its field position, but the offense could not consistently convert those opportunities into points.

Punt Return Statistics

Isaiah Williams also handled punt-return duties for New York.

He recorded:

  • Three punt returns.
  • 23 total yards.
  • 7.7 yards per return.
  • 13 yards on his longest return.

Baltimore did not record a punt return.

The Jets therefore received additional special-teams involvement from Williams, who contributed in both kick-return and punt-return situations.

Scoring Summary: How Baltimore Built Its 23-10 Victory

The scoring progression shows why the third quarter was so important.

New York entered halftime with a 7-3 advantage, but Baltimore scored 14 points in the third quarter and took control.

The Ravens then added six points in the fourth quarter.

First Quarter: Defensive Opening

Neither team scored during the opening quarter.

Both offenses faced a difficult task establishing consistent production, and the scoreboard remained unchanged.

A scoreless opening period can place additional importance on field position and possession management.

Both teams needed to find ways to create better opportunities as the game progressed.

Second Quarter: Jets Take the Lead

New York scored seven points in the second quarter.

Baltimore responded with a field goal, leaving the Jets ahead 7-3 at halftime.

The four-point difference meant that the game remained competitive.

At this stage, the Jets had managed to turn one offensive possession into a touchdown, while Baltimore had recorded only three points.

Third Quarter: Ravens Take Control

The third quarter changed the direction of the contest.

Baltimore scored 14 points without allowing New York to respond.

Derrick Henry’s rushing contributions were central to the Ravens’ scoring success.

The Ravens’ two rushing touchdowns transformed a close game into a more comfortable lead.

The Jets’ inability to score during this period created additional pressure on their offense.

Fourth Quarter: Baltimore Protects Its Lead

Baltimore added six more points during the final quarter.

New York managed a field goal, but the three points were not enough to close the gap.

The Ravens maintained their advantage and finished with a 23-10 victory.

Final Scoring Comparison

Scoring Category Jets Ravens
Total Touchdowns 1 2
Rushing Touchdowns 0 2
Passing Touchdowns 1 0
Field Goals 1 3
Extra Points 1 2
Total Points 10 23

The scoring breakdown shows that Baltimore’s advantage came primarily from its rushing touchdowns and more productive kicking performance.

New York’s only touchdown came through the passing game.

Baltimore scored both touchdowns through Derrick Henry and added three field goals.

This distribution made the Ravens less dependent on Jackson producing passing touchdowns.

Key Statistical Differences That Decided the Game

The final score provides a simple summary, but several statistical comparisons explain how Baltimore created its advantage.

1. Baltimore Produced More Rushing Touchdowns

The biggest scoring difference came from the running game.

Baltimore recorded two rushing touchdowns, both from Derrick Henry. New York did not score a rushing touchdown.

Although the Jets averaged 3.0 yards per carry compared with Baltimore’s 2.9, the Ravens made their rushing opportunities count when they reached scoring positions.

This distinction is important because football teams are not rewarded simply for accumulating rushing yardage. They must convert offensive opportunities into points.

2. Baltimore Generated More Defensive Pressure

The Ravens recorded:

  • Three sacks.
  • Seven quarterback hits.
  • Four tackles for loss.
  • One interception.

The Jets recorded one sack, one quarterback hit, and two tackles for loss.

The difference in quarterback pressure was particularly noticeable in the team statistics.

Baltimore’s seven quarterback hits compared with New York’s one show that the Ravens were more successful at disrupting the opposing passing game.

3. New York Had More Passing Yards but Fewer Points

The Jets produced 222 passing yards, while Baltimore recorded 153.

New York also had more receptions and a higher average per reception.

However, those advantages did not produce a better scoring result.

The Jets scored only 10 points, while Baltimore scored 23.

This highlights an important distinction between offensive volume and offensive efficiency. Moving the ball is valuable, but converting successful plays into touchdowns and field goals is what determines the final score.

4. Turnovers Favored Baltimore

New York committed two turnovers, while Baltimore lost none of its recorded possessions through turnovers.

The Jets lost Hall’s fumble and threw one interception.

Jackson fumbled once, but Baltimore recovered the ball. T.J. Tampa also recorded an interception for the Ravens.

This created a positive turnover margin for Baltimore and reduced the number of opportunities available to New York.

5. Baltimore Had More Field-Goal Production

Tyler Loop made three field goals, while Nick Folk made one.

Baltimore’s advantage in kicking points helped increase the difference between the teams.

The Ravens were able to add points through their kicking unit even when their passing game did not produce a touchdown.

Team Statistics Comparison

The following table brings together the major team-level numbers from the supplied box-score data.

Statistical Category New York Jets Baltimore Ravens
Final Score 10 23
Passing Yards 204 net 143 net
Player Passing Yards 222 153
Rushing Attempts 26 34
Rushing Yards 78 98
Rushing Average 3.0 2.9
Rushing Touchdowns 0 2
Receptions 17 13
Receiving Yards 222 153
Receiving Touchdowns 1 0
Sacks Recorded 1 3
Tackles for Loss 2 4
Quarterback Hits 1 7
Interceptions Recorded 0 1
Fumbles Lost 1 0
Total Tackles 70 72
Solo Tackles 26 35
Field Goals Made 1 3
Kick Return Yards 156 86
Punt Return Yards 23 0

Note: Player passing yards represent individual gross passing production. Team passing yards in the supplied data are net of sack yardage. Receiving yards are reported separately and should not be added to passing yards as an additional team passing total.

The table reveals a fascinating contrast.

New York had more passing production and kick-return yardage, but Baltimore controlled several other important categories.

The Ravens had more rushing attempts, rushing touchdowns, sacks, quarterback hits, interceptions, and field goals.

These advantages contributed directly to their victory.

Offensive Strategy: Why the Ravens Found More Ways to Score

Baltimore’s offensive performance was not based on one statistical category.

Instead, the team used several methods to build its 23 points.

A Ground-Based Scoring Approach

Derrick Henry’s 21 carries gave Baltimore a dependable rushing option.

His two touchdowns were the most important part of the scoring performance.

The Ravens also used Jackson, Flowers, Mitchell, and Andrews as additional rushing options.

This distribution gave the offense multiple ways to approach running situations.

Even though the team’s average remained below three yards per attempt, Baltimore continued to use the ground game.

The result was two rushing touchdowns and enough offensive production to establish a second-half advantage.

Passing Contributions Without a Passing Touchdown

Jackson finished with 153 passing yards and no passing touchdowns.

That number might appear modest, but it does not fully explain Baltimore’s offensive approach.

The Ravens did not need Jackson to produce a high-volume passing performance because Henry was able to finish scoring opportunities on the ground.

Flowers led the receiving group with 58 yards, while Walker added a 30-yard reception.

Henry also contributed 24 receiving yards.

These plays provided useful offensive support without requiring a passing touchdown.

Better Scoring Distribution

Baltimore scored through three field goals and two rushing touchdowns.

That distribution meant the Ravens could accumulate points even when the passing offense was not particularly productive.

The Jets, on the other hand, relied on one passing touchdown and one field goal.

Their offense did not find another reliable scoring method during the game.

Jets Offensive Analysis: What the Numbers Reveal

New York’s offensive statistics were not entirely negative.

Taylor passed for 222 yards, Hall accumulated 119 yards from scrimmage, and Metchie recorded six receptions.

However, several limitations prevented those contributions from becoming a competitive scoring performance.

The Running Game Lacked Consistency

Hall carried the ball 16 times but gained only 44 yards.

His average of 2.8 yards per attempt made it difficult for New York to consistently establish favorable rushing situations.

Taylor added 19 rushing yards, but the overall team rushing total remained at 78 yards.

The Jets needed more consistent production from their ground attack to reduce the pressure on Taylor.

Passing Yardage Did Not Become Enough Points

The Jets’ 222 passing yards were higher than Baltimore’s 153.

Hall’s 75 receiving yards and Metchie’s 65 yards provided useful production.

Adonai Mitchell also averaged 21 yards per reception.

However, New York finished with just one passing touchdown.

This suggests that the team had some success moving the ball but did not maintain enough offensive consistency to finish additional possessions.

Protection Problems Affected the Passing Game

Baltimore recorded three sacks and seven quarterback hits.

Those numbers indicate that New York’s passing offense experienced repeated pressure.

Taylor’s three sacks resulted in 18 lost yards.

The combination of sacks, an interception, and a lost fumble made it harder for the Jets to sustain drives.

Better pass protection and improved ball security would have been important areas for improvement.

Individual Performances Worth Highlighting

Several players delivered notable statistical performances, even though the final result favored Baltimore.

Derrick Henry: Two Touchdowns

Baltimore’s leading scorer

Henry finished with 64 rushing yards on 21 attempts.

His two rushing touchdowns were the defining individual contribution of the game.

He also caught two passes for 24 yards, bringing his total offensive yardage to 88.

His impact was not limited to gaining rushing yards. He helped Baltimore turn important possessions into points.

Breece Hall: 119 Yards from Scrimmage

Hall recorded 44 rushing yards and 75 receiving yards.

His four receptions averaged 18.8 yards, and his longest catch covered 40 yards.

His combined production of 119 yards from scrimmage made him New York’s leading offensive contributor by this measure.

However, he also lost one fumble, which reduced the value of his overall performance.

Tyrod Taylor: 222 Passing Yards

Taylor completed 17 passes on 28 attempts.

His 222 passing yards and one touchdown showed that New York had some success through the air.

However, the interception and three sacks were important negative factors.

His performance reflected a mixture of productive passing and costly mistakes.

Lamar Jackson: Turnover-Free Passing

Jackson finished with 153 passing yards and no interceptions.

Although he did not throw a touchdown, he helped manage Baltimore’s offense while the running game supplied the touchdowns.

He also contributed 11 rushing yards.

His fumble was recovered by Baltimore, meaning it did not result in a lost possession.

Roquan Smith: 11 Tackles

Smith led the Ravens with 11 tackles and six solo stops.

His contribution helped Baltimore control defensive situations and limit New York’s offensive opportunities.

Jamien Sherwood: 13 Tackles

Sherwood led all players with 13 total tackles.

His performance was one of the most notable defensive achievements for New York.

Despite the defeat, his tackle total demonstrated how heavily involved he was in the Jets’ defensive effort.

What This Match Reveals About NFL Player Statistics

A box score is more than a collection of numbers. When properly analyzed, it helps explain how individual performances influence team results.

This game provides several useful examples.

Passing Yards Should Be Considered Alongside Touchdowns

Taylor finished with more passing yards than Jackson.

However, Baltimore won by 13 points.

This does not mean passing yards are unimportant. It means that passing production should be considered alongside touchdowns, interceptions, sacks, and the team’s rushing performance.

A quarterback can produce substantial yardage without leading an offense to enough points.

Rushing Touchdowns Can Matter More Than Rushing Average

The Jets averaged 3.0 yards per carry, while Baltimore averaged 2.9.

Despite the slightly lower average, Baltimore scored twice on the ground.

That difference shows why rushing statistics need context.

A strong analysis considers:

  • Total rushing attempts.
  • Rushing yardage.
  • Yards per carry.
  • Touchdowns.
  • Longest runs.
  • Contribution to scoring drives.

No single rushing metric explains everything.

Defensive Pressure Can Change Offensive Efficiency

Baltimore’s three sacks and seven quarterback hits were important because they disrupted the Jets’ passing operation.

A defense does not need to record several interceptions to influence a game.

Pressure, tackles for loss, and quarterback hits can all reduce offensive efficiency.

The Ravens demonstrated this through their defensive production.

Turnovers Provide Important Context

Hall’s lost fumble and Taylor’s interception gave Baltimore additional advantages.

Turnovers are especially important because they can end promising offensive possessions without the opposing defense needing to force a punt.

When studying a match, turnover statistics should always be considered alongside yardage and scoring.

How to Read and Interpret the Box Score Correctly

For readers researching individual football performances, understanding the different statistical categories is essential.

The following explanations make the numbers easier to interpret.

Passing Yards vs Net Passing Yards

Passing yards describe the yardage credited to a quarterback’s completed passes.

Net passing yards at team level account for sack yardage lost.

In this matchup, Taylor’s player passing total was 222 yards, while the Jets’ team passing summary listed 204 yards after 18 sack yards.

Jackson recorded 153 passing yards, while Baltimore’s team summary listed 143 after 10 sack yards.

This is why the two types of figures should not be confused.

Completion Percentage

Completion percentage measures how many completed passes a quarterback recorded compared with total attempts.

The formula is:

 

CompletionPercentage=CompletionsAttempts100

Taylor completed 17 of 28 attempts, producing a completion percentage of approximately 60.7%.

Jackson completed 13 of 23 attempts, producing approximately 56.5%.

This statistic provides a useful indication of passing accuracy, although it does not measure every aspect of quarterback performance.

Yards Per Carry

Yards per carry measures the average rushing yardage gained on each attempt.

 

YardsPerCarry=RushingYardsCarries

Henry gained 64 yards on 21 attempts, giving him an average of approximately 3.0 yards per carry.

Hall gained 44 yards on 16 attempts, producing an average of 2.8.

Yards Per Reception

This statistic measures the average number of receiving yards gained per completed catch.

 

YardsPerReception=ReceivingYardsReceptions

Hall averaged 18.8 yards per reception, while Flowers averaged 11.6.

This helps explain why Hall was able to generate significant receiving yardage from only four catches.

Passer Rating and QBR

Passer rating and Total QBR are two different quarterback evaluation systems.

Passer rating uses passing-related statistics, including completions, passing yards, touchdowns, and interceptions.

Total QBR is a separate ESPN metric designed to evaluate quarterback contributions in a broader game context.

The two measures should not be treated as interchangeable.

For this game, Taylor recorded an 82.7 passer rating and 66.1 QBR, while Jackson recorded a 76.9 passer rating and 34.7 QBR.

These numbers provide additional context, but neither should replace a full evaluation of passing, rushing, turnovers, and game situation.

Historical and Statistical Context of the Match

The November 23, 2025, matchup is an example of how different offensive approaches can produce very different results.

New York relied more heavily on its passing game, while Baltimore used its rushing attack to generate touchdowns and its defense to create pressure.

The Ravens’ 23-10 victory also demonstrated the importance of playing complementary football. The offense produced enough points, the defense created turnovers and sacks, and special teams contributed through consistent field-goal kicking.

What Made the Third Quarter So Important?

The score was 7-3 in favor of New York at halftime.

Baltimore then scored 14 points in the third quarter without allowing a response.

That eight-point swing in scoring production was the most important statistical development of the game.

It changed the Ravens from a team trailing by four points into a team leading by 10.

The Jets were unable to respond during the same period, which increased the pressure on their offense in the final quarter.

Why the Ravens Did Not Need a Passing Touchdown

Jackson finished without a passing touchdown, but Baltimore still scored 23 points.

Henry’s two rushing touchdowns provided the foundation for the victory.

Loop’s three field goals supplied another nine points, while two successful extra points completed Baltimore’s scoring total.

This is a useful reminder that a quarterback’s passing touchdown total does not always reflect the overall success of an offense.

Baltimore used its running game and kicking unit to compensate for a relatively quiet passing performance.

Why the Jets’ Offensive Production Was Not Enough

New York produced 222 passing yards and had several players make meaningful contributions.

Hall generated 119 yards from scrimmage, Metchie caught six passes, and Mitchell averaged 21 yards per reception.

However, the Jets struggled with turnovers and offensive consistency.

Their rushing attack did not score, and the defense could not create enough pressure to disrupt Baltimore’s offensive approach.

The result was a statistical performance with some positive individual numbers but an unfavorable team outcome.

Where to Find the Official Match Statistics

Readers who want to examine the original numbers can consult the ESPN official Ravens vs Jets box score.

The box score provides the original game record and statistical categories, including:

  • Quarterback passing statistics.
  • Individual rushing performances.
  • Receiving yards and receptions.
  • Defensive tackles and sacks.
  • Interceptions and fumbles.
  • Kicking and punting statistics.
  • Kick returns and punt returns.
  • Team-level statistical summaries.

Checking the original statistical record is particularly useful when comparing player totals with team totals, because certain categories use different accounting methods.

For example, player passing yards and net team passing yards are not necessarily identical after sack yardage is deducted.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What was the final score of the New York Jets vs Baltimore Ravens game on November 23, 2025?

The Baltimore Ravens defeated the New York Jets 23-10 on November 23, 2025. Baltimore scored 14 points in the third quarter to take control of the game and secured the victory at home.

2. Who was the leading rusher in the Jets vs Ravens game?

Derrick Henry was Baltimore’s leading rusher with 64 yards on 21 carries and two rushing touchdowns. Breece Hall led New York with 44 rushing yards on 16 attempts.

3. How many passing yards did Tyrod Taylor record against the Ravens?

Tyrod Taylor completed 17 of 28 passes for 222 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. He also recorded three sacks for 18 yards lost.

4. How did Lamar Jackson perform against the New York Jets?

Lamar Jackson completed 13 of 23 passes for 153 yards without a passing touchdown or interception. He added 11 rushing yards on seven attempts. His passer rating was 76.9.

5. Who led the Jets and Ravens in receiving yards?

Breece Hall led the Jets with 75 receiving yards on four receptions. Zay Flowers led Baltimore with 58 receiving yards on five receptions.

6. Which defensive players recorded the most tackles in the game?

Jamien Sherwood led all players with 13 tackles for the Jets. Roquan Smith led Baltimore with 11 tackles, while Kyle Hamilton added 10.

Conclusion

The November 23, 2025, matchup between the New York Jets and Baltimore Ravens demonstrated the importance of balanced team performance, defensive pressure, and scoring efficiency. Baltimore secured a 23-10 victory by combining Derrick Henry’s two rushing touchdowns with three successful field goals and an effective defensive performance.

The Jets had the advantage in passing yards and receiving production. Tyrod Taylor threw for 222 yards, while Breece Hall contributed 119 total yards from scrimmage. However, New York struggled to convert its offensive production into points and committed two turnovers.

Baltimore’s defense recorded three sacks, seven quarterback hits, and one interception. Roquan Smith led the Ravens with 11 tackles, while Dre’Mont Jones contributed 1.5 sacks. On the other side, Jamien Sherwood led all defenders with 13 tackles.

The most significant difference appeared in the scoring and defensive statistics. Baltimore scored two rushing touchdowns, made three field goals, protected possession more effectively, and produced consistent pressure against Taylor.

Ultimately, the game showed that passing yardage alone cannot determine a team’s success. Baltimore’s ability to score through multiple methods and create defensive disruption proved decisive in the 23-10 result.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *