Washington Commanders vs Minnesota Vikings Match Player Stats

The washington commanders vs minnesota vikings match player stats from December 7, 2025, tell the story of a 31-0 Minnesota victory in which the Vikings controlled the game through efficient quarterback play, a balanced rushing attack, timely scoring drives, and a defense that forced three Washington turnovers. Minnesota finished with 313 total yards compared with Washington’s 206, held a 25-12 advantage in first downs, and converted 6 of 11 third downs while Washington managed only 3 of 10.

The final score alone does not explain how the game developed. Minnesota scored in every quarter, while Washington failed to put a single point on the board. J.J. McCarthy completed 16 of 23 passes for 163 yards and three touchdowns without an interception, while Washington used both Jayden Daniels and Marcus Mariota at quarterback. Daniels finished 9 of 20 for 78 yards with one interception, and Mariota went 2 of 4 for 30 yards with another interception.

This detailed breakdown examines the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, turnover, and special teams numbers that shaped the contest.

Game Overview

The Week 14 matchup was played at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis on December 7, 2025. Minnesota entered the game 5-8, while Washington was 3-10. The Vikings eventually won 31-0, improving their record to 6-8 according to the subsequent season record, while Washington dropped to 3-11.

The scoring pattern was remarkably consistent:

Quarter	Washington	Minnesota
First	0	7
Second	0	7
Third	0	10
Fourth	0	7
Final	0	31

Minnesota’s five scoring plays included three touchdown passes from McCarthy, one rushing touchdown by Jordan Mason, and a 45-yard field goal by Will Reichard. Josh Oliver caught two touchdown passes, while T.J. Hockenson caught the other.

The game also featured a significant possession advantage. Minnesota held the football for 34:52 compared with Washington’s 25:08. The Vikings ran 61 offensive plays, while Washington ran 49.

That difference matters because the Vikings were not simply winning individual statistical categories. They were repeatedly extending possessions and limiting Washington’s opportunities.

Washington Commanders vs Minnesota Vikings Match Player Stats: Passing

Quarterback production was one of the clearest statistical differences in the game.

J.J. McCarthy

McCarthy delivered the most efficient passing performance of the matchup:

Statistic	J.J. McCarthy
Completions	16
Attempts	23
Completion Rate	69.6%
Passing Yards	163
Average	7.1
Touchdowns	3
Interceptions	0
Sacks	4
Sack Yards Lost	12
Passer Rating	129.2
QBR	76.1

McCarthy’s three touchdown passes accounted for all three Minnesota passing touchdowns. Two went to Josh Oliver, while the other went to Hockenson.

His efficiency was particularly important because Minnesota did not need an extremely high passing volume. McCarthy attempted only 23 passes, yet Minnesota generated 163 gross passing yards and three touchdowns.

The Vikings’ opening possession went 61 yards on seven plays and did not require a third-down conversion. McCarthy completed all four of his throws on that opening drive for 46 yards.

Jayden Daniels

Daniels completed 9 of 20 attempts for 78 yards and one interception.

Statistic	Jayden Daniels
Completions	9
Attempts	20
Completion Rate	45.0%
Passing Yards	78
Average	3.9
Touchdowns	0
Interceptions	1
Sacks	1
Sack Yards Lost	1
Passer Rating	35.0
QBR	13.2

Daniels also contributed 16 rushing yards on four attempts. However, Washington’s offense never found a way to convert those individual contributions into scoring production.

Marcus Mariota

Mariota entered the game and completed 2 of 4 passes for 30 yards. He also threw an interception and was sacked once for eight yards.

His final passing line was:

• 2 completions
• 4 attempts
• 30 yards
• 7.5 yards per attempt
• 0 touchdowns
• 1 interception
• 35.4 passer rating

Mariota also rushed twice for seven yards. His lost fumble added another turnover to Washington’s total.

Team Passing Comparison

Passing Category	Washington	Minnesota
Completions	11	16
Attempts	24	23
Completion Rate	45.8%	69.6%
Gross Passing Yards	108	163
Net Passing Yards	99	151
Passing TDs	0	3
Interceptions	2	0
Sacks	2	4
Yards Lost on Sacks	9	12
Passer Rating	24.3	129.2

The most important distinction is efficiency rather than volume. Both teams attempted a similar number of passes, but Minnesota completed five more throws, produced three touchdowns, and avoided interceptions.

Washington Rushing Performance

Washington actually produced a respectable rushing average, finishing with 107 yards on 23 carries.

Chris Rodriguez Jr.

Rodriguez was Washington’s leading rusher:

• 10 carries
• 52 yards
• 5.2 yards per carry
• 15-yard long
• 0 touchdowns

His 52 yards represented almost half of Washington’s rushing production.

Jacory Croskey-Merritt

Croskey-Merritt added:

• 7 carries
• 32 yards
• 4.6 yards per carry
• 10-yard long
• 0 touchdowns

Jayden Daniels

Daniels contributed four rushing attempts for 16 yards, averaging 4.0 yards per carry.

Marcus Mariota

Mariota added seven yards on two carries.

Together, Washington’s four listed rushers accounted for all 107 team rushing yards.

The interesting part of these numbers is that Washington was not completely ineffective on the ground. A 4.7-yard team rushing average is not inherently poor. The larger issue was that the rushing production did not lead to sustained scoring opportunities.

Minnesota Rushing Performance

Minnesota rushed 34 times for 162 yards, averaging 4.8 yards per attempt.

Aaron Jones Sr.

Jones was the game’s leading rusher:

• 14 carries
• 76 yards
• 5.4 yards per carry
• 18-yard long
• 0 touchdowns

His 76 yards represented the largest individual rushing total of the game.

Jordan Mason

Mason provided the touchdown production on the ground:

• 11 carries
• 52 yards
• 4.7 yards per carry
• 12-yard long
• 1 touchdown

His eight-yard touchdown run extended Minnesota’s lead to 14-0 in the second quarter.

J.J. McCarthy and Zavier Scott

McCarthy rushed six times for 19 yards, including a 16-yard run. Zavier Scott added 15 yards on three carries.

The combined result was a Minnesota rushing attack that consistently supported the passing game instead of forcing McCarthy to carry the entire offense.

Rushing Comparison

Category	Washington	Minnesota
Attempts	23	34
Yards	107	162
Average	4.7	4.8
Touchdowns	0	1
Long	15	18

Minnesota ran the ball 11 more times and gained 55 additional rushing yards.

That workload difference also helped the Vikings control possession. Minnesota finished with nearly ten additional minutes of possession time.

Washington Receiving Statistics

Washington’s receivers combined for 11 receptions and 108 receiving yards.

Terry McLaurin

McLaurin led Washington in receiving yards:

• 3 receptions
• 41 yards
• 13.7 yards per reception
• 28-yard long
• 6 targets
• 0 touchdowns

His 28-yard reception was Washington’s longest completed pass of the game.

Deebo Samuel Sr.

Samuel finished with:

• 4 receptions
• 27 yards
• 6.8 yards per reception
• 15-yard long
• 6 targets

He also returned four kickoffs for 87 yards, giving him a significant role outside the conventional receiving statistics.

Other Washington Receivers

Noah Brown recorded one catch for 19 yards, while Zach Ertz had one reception for 11 yards.

Ben Sinnott caught one pass for eight yards, and Jeremy McNichols had one reception for two yards.

Washington therefore had no receiver reach 50 yards and no receiver scored a touchdown.

Minnesota Receiving Statistics

Minnesota’s receiving group produced 163 yards on 16 receptions.

Jordan Addison

Addison led the Vikings in receiving yards:

• 4 receptions
• 62 yards
• 15.5 yards per reception
• 21-yard long
• 7 targets
• 0 touchdowns

His 62 yards were the highest receiving total by either team.

Josh Oliver

Oliver was the biggest scoring contributor among Minnesota’s receivers.

He caught:

• 2 passes
• 24 yards
• 12.0 yards per reception
• 18-yard long
• 2 touchdowns
• 2 targets

Both of Oliver’s targets became touchdowns.

T.J. Hockenson

Hockenson recorded two catches for 12 yards and one touchdown on three targets.

His two-yard touchdown reception in the fourth quarter completed the scoring.

Jalen Nailor and Justin Jefferson

Nailor caught three passes for 30 yards.

Justin Jefferson had two receptions for 11 yards on four targets. Although his receiving numbers were modest, Minnesota’s offense did not need a large statistical game from Jefferson because production was spread across several players.

Receiving Comparison

Category	Washington	Minnesota
Receptions	11	16
Targets	20	23
Receiving Yards	108	163
Average per Reception	9.8	10.2
Touchdowns	0	3
Long	28	21

This is an important part of understanding the game. Minnesota’s leading receiver, Addison, did not score. Jefferson did not score. Instead, the Vikings used multiple players to create the touchdown production.

That made the passing offense less dependent on one individual matchup.

Washington Commanders Defensive Stats

Washington’s defense recorded 70 tackles, 33 solo tackles, four sacks, three tackles for loss, five passes defended, and six quarterback hits.

The four sacks were significant because Washington generated pressure even though the final score heavily favored Minnesota. The Commanders’ official postgame statistics noted that the team recorded three sacks in the first half, its highest first-half sack total of the season at that point.

However, pressure did not translate into turnovers.

Washington finished with:

• 0 interceptions
• 4 sacks
• 6 quarterback hits
• 3 tackles for loss
• 5 passes defended

The absence of interceptions was particularly notable because Minnesota’s defense created two.

Minnesota Vikings Defensive Stats

Minnesota recorded 60 tackles, 21 solo tackles, two sacks, four tackles for loss, three passes defended, and three quarterback hits.

The Vikings also intercepted Washington twice:

• Andrew Van Ginkel: 1 interception, 40 return yards
• Harrison Smith: 1 interception, 11 return yards

Together, the two interceptions produced 51 return yards.

Minnesota also recovered Washington’s only lost fumble.

That gave the Vikings a major advantage in turnover production.

Turnovers Tell an Important Part of the Story

Washington committed three turnovers:

1. Jayden Daniels threw one interception.
2. Marcus Mariota threw one interception.
3. Mariota lost one fumble.

Minnesota committed zero turnovers.

That produced a turnover differential of plus-three for Minnesota.

The Vikings did not need to create an unusually high sack total to dominate the game. Their two interceptions and recovery of the lost fumble were enough to repeatedly prevent Washington from turning possessions into points.

The official Washington statistics confirm that Daniels and Mariota each threw an interception, while Mariota also lost a fumble.

Third-Down and Fourth-Down Efficiency

Third-down performance shows another major difference.

Situation	Washington	Minnesota
Third Downs	3/10	6/11
Third-Down Rate	30%	54.5%
Fourth Downs	1/3	2/2
Fourth-Down Rate	33.3%	100%

Minnesota converted more than half of its third downs and converted both fourth-down attempts.

Washington converted only three of ten third downs and one of three fourth downs.

This helps explain why the Vikings generated 25 first downs compared with 12 for Washington.

The first-down difference was not merely a result of explosive plays. Minnesota repeatedly kept drives alive.

Time of Possession

Minnesota held possession for 34:52.

Washington had the ball for 25:08.

That difference of 9:44 gave Minnesota more opportunities to establish its offense and forced Washington’s defense to spend more time on the field.

Minnesota ran 61 plays to Washington’s 49, a difference of 12 offensive snaps.

For a game that ended 31-0, these numbers provide useful context. The Vikings did not simply score quickly and then disappear. They sustained drives throughout the afternoon.

How Minnesota Built the 31-0 Lead

The scoring sequence was straightforward.

First Quarter: Josh Oliver Opens the Scoring

McCarthy connected with Oliver for an 18-yard touchdown.

The drive covered 61 yards on seven plays.

Minnesota led 7-0.

Second Quarter: Jordan Mason Extends the Lead

Minnesota followed with a 98-yard touchdown drive that consumed 12:01.

Mason finished the drive with an eight-yard touchdown run.

The Vikings entered halftime with a 14-0 lead.

Third Quarter: Reichard and Oliver Add More Points

Reichard converted a 45-yard field goal to make it 17-0.

Later in the quarter, McCarthy found Oliver again for a six-yard touchdown.

The score moved to 24-0.

Fourth Quarter: Hockenson Finishes the Scoring

McCarthy connected with Hockenson for a two-yard touchdown.

That made the final score 31-0.

What the Player Stats Reveal Beyond the Box Score

A box score can show who gained yards, but the deeper value comes from connecting those numbers.

1. Minnesota Did Not Need High Passing Volume

McCarthy attempted only 23 passes.

That is fewer attempts than many high-volume passing performances, but three touchdown passes and zero interceptions made those opportunities highly productive.

2. The Vikings Balanced Their Offense

Minnesota ran 34 times and passed 23 times.

The rushing attack produced 162 yards, while passing generated 151 net yards.

That balance prevented Washington from focusing entirely on McCarthy.

3. Washington’s Rushing Game Was Not the Main Problem

Washington averaged 4.7 yards per carry.

That is close to Minnesota’s 4.8-yard average.

The larger difference came from passing efficiency, turnovers, third downs, and scoring execution.

4. Minnesota Converted Opportunities

The Vikings went 4-for-4 in the red zone according to the game statistics. Washington went 0-for-2.

That is perhaps one of the cleanest statistical explanations for the final score.

When Minnesota reached scoring territory, it finished drives.

When Washington reached those situations, it did not.

Washington Commanders vs Minnesota Vikings Match Player Stats: Key Leaders

The most useful individual statistical leaders can be summarized as follows:

Category	Player	Statistic
Passing Yards	J.J. McCarthy	163
Passing TDs	J.J. McCarthy	3
Rushing Yards	Aaron Jones Sr.	76
Rushing TDs	Jordan Mason	1
Receiving Yards	Jordan Addison	62
Receiving TDs	Josh Oliver	2
Washington Passing Yards	Jayden Daniels	78
Washington Rushing Yards	Chris Rodriguez Jr.	52
Washington Receiving Yards	Terry McLaurin	41
Minnesota Interceptions	Andrew Van Ginkel, Harrison Smith	1 each

These figures make clear that Minnesota’s production was distributed across multiple players.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams were not the central story, but they contributed to field position and scoring.

Washington

Tress Way punted three times for 140 yards, averaging 46.7 yards per punt. His longest punt traveled 49 yards, and one punt landed inside the 20-yard line.

Deebo Samuel Sr. returned four kickoffs for 87 yards, averaging 21.8 yards per return.

Minnesota

Myles Price returned one kickoff for 35 yards and two punts for eight total yards.

Reichard converted his only field goal attempt, a 45-yarder, and made all four extra-point attempts.

His seven points represented Minnesota’s only kicking points.

What Happened to Washington’s Passing Attack?

The passing statistics point to several connected problems.

Washington completed only 11 of 24 passes.

The team produced 99 net passing yards.

Two interceptions ended possessions.

The quarterbacks combined for no touchdown passes.

Washington also managed only 12 first downs.

The result was an offense that struggled to maintain consistent rhythm.

Daniels’ individual rushing ability added another dimension, but four carries for 16 yards could not compensate for the passing inefficiency.

The injury situation also affected the game. Daniels left after the interception, and Mariota subsequently took over. Contemporary reporting described Daniels as leaving with an arm injury.

What Worked for Minnesota’s Offense?

Minnesota’s offensive success came from several complementary elements.

First, McCarthy protected the football.

Second, the running game produced 162 yards.

Third, multiple receivers contributed.

Fourth, Minnesota converted 6 of 11 third downs.

Fifth, the Vikings finished all four red-zone opportunities with points, including three touchdowns and one field goal.

The result was an offense that did not depend on one statistical category.

McCarthy threw three touchdowns, Mason rushed for one, Jones produced 76 rushing yards, and Addison led the team in receiving yards.

Defensive Difference Between the Teams

One of the more interesting details is that Washington actually recorded more sacks.

Washington had four sacks.

Minnesota had two.

Yet Minnesota’s defense generated the more consequential turnover production.

The Vikings intercepted Daniels and Mariota and recovered Mariota’s fumble.

That is an important lesson when reading defensive statistics. Sack totals measure one form of pressure, but turnovers can have a much more direct effect on possession and scoring opportunities.

A Statistical Breakdown of the Shutout

A 31-0 result requires both offensive production and defensive prevention.

Minnesota achieved both.

The Vikings:

• Scored 31 points
• Produced 313 total yards
• Gained 162 rushing yards
• Produced 151 net passing yards
• Recorded 25 first downs
• Converted 54.5% of third downs
• Went 2-for-2 on fourth down
• Went 4-for-4 in the red zone
• Committed zero turnovers
• Held the ball for 34:52

Washington:

• Scored 0 points
• Produced 206 total yards
• Gained 107 rushing yards
• Produced 99 net passing yards
• Recorded 12 first downs
• Converted 30% of third downs
• Went 1-for-3 on fourth down
• Went 0-for-2 in the red zone
• Committed three turnovers
• Held the ball for 25:08

This statistical combination explains the shutout more effectively than the final score by itself.

Why the Receiving Numbers Are Interesting

The Vikings had 16 receptions from their passing game, but no player exceeded 62 receiving yards.

That suggests a spread-out passing attack.

Addison led the group with 62 yards. Nailor contributed 30. Oliver had 24 and two touchdowns. Hockenson added 12 and a touchdown. Jefferson had 11.

Washington had a similar lack of a 100-yard receiver, but its overall passing production was much lower.

The key difference was what happened after the catches.

Minnesota’s receivers helped convert drives into touchdowns.

Washington’s receivers did not produce a touchdown reception.

Why Josh Oliver’s Two Touchdowns Matter

Oliver’s numbers are a useful example of why receiving yards alone cannot determine offensive impact.

He had only 24 receiving yards.

Addison had 62.

Yet Oliver scored twice.

Both of his targets became touchdowns.

That means his statistical contribution was highly concentrated in the most valuable part of the field.

His first touchdown came on an 18-yard reception in the first quarter.

His second came on a six-yard reception in the third quarter.

Washington’s Most Productive Offensive Players

For Washington, Rodriguez was the leading rusher with 52 yards.

McLaurin was the leading receiver with 41 yards.

Daniels was the leading passer with 78 yards.

No Washington offensive player scored a touchdown.

This creates a simple statistical picture: Washington had individual contributions, but none developed into sustained scoring production.

Minnesota’s Most Productive Offensive Players

Minnesota’s leading contributors were spread across the offense.

McCarthy:

• 163 passing yards
• 3 passing touchdowns
• 0 interceptions

Jones:

• 76 rushing yards

Mason:

• 52 rushing yards
• 1 rushing touchdown

Addison:

• 62 receiving yards

Oliver:

• 2 receiving touchdowns

Hockenson:

• 1 receiving touchdown

That distribution made the Vikings’ offense difficult to reduce to a single player statistic.

Historical Context of the Result

The game also had an unusual historical angle.

Minnesota had been shut out in its previous game, then responded by shutting out Washington 31-0. Minnesota became the first team since the 1992 Denver Broncos to follow a shutout loss by recording a shutout win.

That context makes the result more notable than an ordinary 31-point victory.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Washington Commanders and Minnesota Vikings?

The Minnesota Vikings defeated the Washington Commanders 31-0 on December 7, 2025, at U.S. Bank Stadium. Minnesota scored in all four quarters, while Washington was held scoreless.

Who was the leading passer in the game?

J.J. McCarthy was the leading passer. He completed 16 of 23 attempts for 163 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions. His passer rating was 129.2.

Who led the game in rushing?

Aaron Jones Sr. led all rushers with 76 yards on 14 carries. He averaged 5.4 yards per carry and recorded an 18-yard long run.

Who led Minnesota in receiving?

Jordan Addison led Minnesota with four receptions for 62 yards. Josh Oliver had the most receiving touchdowns with two.

How many turnovers did each team commit?

Washington committed three turnovers, including two interceptions and one lost fumble. Minnesota committed zero turnovers.

How many total yards did each team gain?

Minnesota gained 313 total yards, while Washington gained 206. Minnesota produced 162 rushing yards and 151 net passing yards. Washington produced 107 rushing yards and 99 net passing yards.

Conclusion

The washington commanders vs minnesota vikings match player stats show a game decided by efficiency, possession control, turnovers, and red-zone execution rather than by one overwhelming statistical category.

Minnesota finished with 313 total yards against Washington’s 206 and controlled possession for 34:52. The Vikings converted 6 of 11 third downs, went 2-for-2 on fourth down, and finished all four red-zone trips with points.

McCarthy’s 163 passing yards and three touchdown passes provided the foundation. Jones and Mason combined for 128 rushing yards, while Addison led the receiving group with 62 yards. Oliver added two touchdown receptions, and Hockenson caught another.

Washington’s leading individual performers were Rodriguez with 52 rushing yards, McLaurin with 41 receiving yards, and Daniels with 78 passing yards. But two interceptions, a lost fumble, no offensive touchdowns, and only 12 first downs prevented the Commanders from turning their yardage into points.

The defensive numbers also provide an important lesson. Washington recorded four sacks compared with Minnesota’s two, but the Vikings produced the decisive turnover advantage with two interceptions and a fumble recovery. In this matchup, possession-changing plays mattered more than raw sack totals.

Overall, the statistical record paints a clear picture of how the 31-0 score developed: Minnesota combined balanced offense, clean quarterback play, strong third-down execution, and opportunistic defense, while Washington struggled to sustain drives and protect the football.