Philadelphia Eagles vs Dallas Cowboys Match Player Stats
The philadelphia eagles vs dallas cowboys match player stats from November 24, 2025, tell the story of a dramatic NFC East contest in which the Dallas Cowboys defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 24-21. Philadelphia built an early advantage through Jalen Hurts and his rushing touchdowns, but Dallas responded with a more productive passing attack, led by Dak Prescott and wide receiver George Pickens. The Eagles finished with 21 points after scoring all of them in the first half, while the Cowboys kept producing offense in the second half to complete the comeback.
The final score reveals only part of the story. Prescott threw for 354 yards and two touchdowns, Pickens recorded 146 receiving yards, and Javonte Williams led Dallas on the ground with 87 rushing yards. Philadelphia had its own standout performances, including A.J. Brown’s 110 receiving yards and two rushing touchdowns from Hurts. However, the Eagles struggled to generate consistent rushing production from their running backs and failed to add points after halftime.
This detailed breakdown examines the final score, quarterback performances, rushing and receiving numbers, defensive contributions, turnovers, special teams, and the key statistical differences that shaped the result. All player statistics below are based on the supplied ESPN box-score data for game ID 401772890. Where player-level and team-level totals differ in the source, those discrepancies are identified rather than silently corrected.
Match Overview and Final Score
The Dallas Cowboys hosted the Philadelphia Eagles on November 24, 2025, in an important divisional matchup. Philadelphia entered the game with an 8-3 overall record, while Dallas had a 5-5-1 record. The Eagles had the stronger season record, but the Cowboys delivered the winning performance on the field.
Philadelphia Eagles
21
Away team
Record: 8-3
24-21
Final
Nov. 24, 2025
Dallas Cowboys
24
Home team
Record: 5-5-1
| Quarter | Eagles | Cowboys |
| First quarter | 14 | 0 |
| Second quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Third quarter | 0 | 7 |
| Fourth quarter | 0 | 10 |
| Total | 21 | 24 |
The quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern explains the result. Philadelphia scored 14 points in the opening quarter and added seven in the second. Dallas entered halftime trailing 21-7, but the Cowboys scored 17 unanswered points across the second half to finish three points ahead.
The Eagles’ inability to score after halftime was the defining offensive problem. Dallas, by contrast, improved its position through a combination of passing production, rushing volume, and a more productive fourth quarter.
Philadelphia Eagles vs Dallas Cowboys Match Player Stats: Quarterback Comparison
Quarterback performance was one of the clearest differences between the teams. Jalen Hurts protected the football through the air and scored twice on the ground, but Dak Prescott generated more passing yards, more passing touchdowns, and a higher yards-per-attempt figure.
Jalen Hurts | Philadelphia Eagles
289 passing yards
27 completions on 39 attempts
- Completion rate: 69.2%
- Touchdowns: 1 passing, 2 rushing
- Interceptions: 0
- Yards per attempt: 7.4
- Passer rating: 99.2
- QBR: 50.5
Dak Prescott | Dallas Cowboys
354 passing yards
23 completions on 36 attempts
- Completion rate: 63.9%
- Touchdowns: 2 passing, 1 rushing
- Interceptions: 1
- Yards per attempt: 9.8
- Passer rating: 103.2
- QBR: 60.6
Jalen Hurts: Efficient passing and valuable rushing touchdowns
Hurts completed 27 of 39 attempts for 289 passing yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. His completion rate was approximately 69.2%, a strong figure that shows he completed a high proportion of his throws.
His contribution went beyond passing. Hurts carried the ball seven times for 33 yards and scored twice on the ground. Those touchdowns accounted for a substantial share of Philadelphia’s points.
His performance therefore needs to be assessed in two parts. As a passer, he was accurate and avoided turnovers. As a runner, he supplied the finishing power that helped Philadelphia establish its early lead.
However, Hurts was sacked once for a loss of 13 yards. His listed QBR of 50.5 also indicates that his overall quarterback evaluation was more moderate than his passer rating of 99.2 might suggest. These are different metrics, so they should not be treated as interchangeable.
The most important team-level issue was that Philadelphia did not score in either of the final two quarters. Hurts’ individual numbers were respectable, but the Eagles’ offense could not turn its first-half production into a complete four-quarter performance.
Dak Prescott: The passing yardage advantage
Prescott completed 23 of 36 passes for 354 yards, two passing touchdowns, and one interception. His completion rate was approximately 63.9%, lower than Hurts’ rate, but his average of 9.8 yards per attempt was considerably higher.
That difference matters because yards per attempt measures how much passing yardage an offense gains relative to its attempts. It helps explain why a quarterback with fewer completions can still produce more total passing yards.
Prescott’s 354 yards were 65 more than Hurts’ 289. He also threw one more passing touchdown and finished with a higher passer rating of 103.2.
His interception was a negative, and it should not be ignored. Philadelphia’s Reed Blankenship recorded the pick, giving the Eagles a defensive takeaway. Nevertheless, Prescott’s downfield production and ability to connect with his receivers helped Dallas overcome the early deficit.
Prescott was also listed with five carries for nine rushing yards and one rushing touchdown. His dual contribution gave Dallas another way to finish a scoring drive.
Which quarterback performed better?
The answer depends on the metric being evaluated.
| Category | Jalen Hurts | Dak Prescott |
| Passing yards | 289 | 354 |
| Completions | 27 | 23 |
| Attempts | 39 | 36 |
| Completion percentage | 69.2% | 63.9% |
| Yards per attempt | 7.4 | 9.8 |
| Passing touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Passer rating | 99.2 | 103.2 |
| QBR | 50.5 | 60.6 |
Hurts was more accurate by completion percentage and avoided an interception. Prescott produced more explosive passing output, threw more passing touchdowns, and finished with better listed quarterback ratings.
For this particular game, Prescott’s passing production was especially important because Dallas needed to overcome a 14-point deficit. Hurts’ rushing touchdowns helped Philadelphia build its lead, but Prescott’s larger passing contribution was a major factor in the comeback.
Rushing Stats: Javonte Williams Leads Dallas
The rushing numbers reveal another important difference between the offenses. Dallas recorded 125 team rushing yards on 31 carries, while Philadelphia finished with 63 yards on 18 carries.
That is a difference of 62 rushing yards. Dallas also had 13 more rushing attempts, giving the Cowboys more opportunities to gain yards and maintain possession.
Philadelphia Eagles rushing statistics
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | TDs |
| Jalen Hurts | 7 | 33 | 4.7 | 2 |
| Saquon Barkley | 10 | 22 | 2.2 | 0 |
| Tank Bigsby | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 18 | 63 | 3.5 | 2 |
Dallas Cowboys rushing statistics
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | TDs |
| Javonte Williams | 20 | 87 | 4.4 | 0 |
| Malik Davis | 3 | 24 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Dak Prescott | 5 | 9 | 1.8 | 1 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Jake Ferguson | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 31 | 125 | 4.0 | 1 |
Javonte Williams provides a steady ground game
Williams led Dallas with 87 rushing yards on 20 carries, averaging 4.4 yards per attempt. His longest run was 20 yards.
Although he did not score a rushing touchdown, Williams provided the volume that helped balance Dallas’ passing offense. His 20 carries represented the majority of the Cowboys’ listed rushing attempts.
This steady contribution was important in a game where Dallas had to recover from an early deficit. A productive ground game can help an offense avoid becoming entirely dependent on passing, while also creating more manageable down-and-distance situations.
Malik Davis added 24 yards on three carries, averaging eight yards per attempt. His longest run was 21 yards, giving Dallas another source of rushing production.
Saquon Barkley’s limited rushing output
Barkley carried the ball 10 times for only 22 yards, averaging 2.2 yards per carry. His longest run was seven yards, and he did not record a rushing touchdown.
That was a notable limitation for Philadelphia. Barkley was the Eagles’ leading listed running back by attempts, but the results did not match the volume of his workload.
The low average made it harder for Philadelphia to rely on its ground attack to move the chains consistently. Hurts’ 33 rushing yards and two touchdowns compensated for some of that shortfall, but quarterback rushing and running-back production serve different tactical purposes.
The data also lists Barkley with seven catches for 52 receiving yards. His receiving contribution helped him remain involved even when his carries were less productive.
What the rushing comparison tells us
Dallas had the clear statistical advantage on the ground in total yardage, rushing attempts, and yards per carry. Philadelphia had more rushing touchdowns, with both of those scores coming from Hurts.
The distinction is important: the Eagles were effective at finishing some rushing opportunities, while the Cowboys generated greater overall rushing volume. The latter helped complement Prescott’s passing production.
Receiving Stats: George Pickens and A.J. Brown Lead Their Teams
The receiving comparison shows how Dallas gained its passing advantage. George Pickens led the Cowboys with 146 receiving yards, while A.J. Brown led Philadelphia with 110.
Both receivers delivered substantial contributions, but Pickens produced the larger yardage total and averaged more yards per catch.
Philadelphia Eagles receiving stats
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Yards | Average | TDs |
| A.J. Brown | 8 | 10 | 110 | 13.8 | 1 |
| DeVonta Smith | 6 | 11 | 89 | 14.8 | 0 |
| Saquon Barkley | 7 | 8 | 52 | 7.4 | 0 |
| Dallas Goedert | 2 | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Grant Calcaterra | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Darius Cooper | 2 | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Xavier Gipson | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Jahan Dotson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 27 | 36 | 289 | 10.7 | 1 |
Dallas Cowboys receiving stats
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Yards | Average | TDs |
| George Pickens | 9 | 9 | 146 | 16.2 | 1 |
| CeeDee Lamb | 4 | 11 | 75 | 18.8 | 0 |
| Jake Ferguson | 5 | 6 | 60 | 12.0 | 0 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 1 | 2 | 48 | 48.0 | 0 |
| Javonte Williams | 2 | 3 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Hunter Luepke | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Brevyn Spann-Ford | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 1 |
| Luke Schoonmaker | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Ryan Flournoy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 23 | 35 | 354 | 15.4 | 2 |
Note: The supplied source reports 289 receiving yards for Philadelphia, matching Hurts’ individual passing-yard figure. Its team passing summary separately lists 276 passing yards. Dallas’ receiving total of 354 also differs from its team passing summary of 348 yards. Both source values are preserved in this article.
George Pickens: Dallas’ leading receiver
Pickens finished with nine receptions on nine targets for 146 yards and one touchdown. His average of 16.2 yards per reception shows that his catches generated substantial yardage.
The fact that he caught every listed target makes the performance particularly notable. A receiver who converts all of his targets while averaging more than 16 yards per catch gives his quarterback a reliable option for advancing the ball.
Pickens’ longest reception was 43 yards. That big-play ability helped stretch Philadelphia’s defense and contributed to the Cowboys’ overall passing efficiency.
His one touchdown also gave Dallas a direct scoring contribution in addition to the yards he accumulated between the two teams’ goal lines.
A.J. Brown: Philadelphia’s top receiving threat
Brown recorded eight catches on 10 targets for 110 yards and one touchdown. He averaged 13.8 yards per reception and produced a longest catch of 22 yards.
His output made him Philadelphia’s leading receiver by yardage. Brown was a productive target for Hurts and converted a high proportion of his opportunities into catches.
DeVonta Smith also played an important role, finishing with six receptions for 89 yards. Smith averaged 14.8 yards per catch and had the longest reception among the Eagles’ listed receivers at 41 yards.
Together, Brown and Smith accounted for 199 receiving yards. Their combined production shows that Philadelphia had capable perimeter threats, even though the team could not turn that passing contribution into second-half points.
CeeDee Lamb and Jake Ferguson support Prescott
Lamb recorded four catches for 75 yards, averaging 18.8 yards per reception. His longest reception was 48 yards, the longest listed catch for Dallas.
Ferguson added five catches for 60 yards and a 12.0-yard average. His five receptions gave Prescott another reliable option beyond the leading wide receivers.
KaVontae Turpin’s single reception was also significant. It went for 48 yards, matching Lamb’s longest catch and creating a large gain on limited receiving volume.
Dallas did not depend on a single receiver to produce every meaningful play. Pickens led the yardage, but Lamb, Ferguson, and Turpin also provided valuable gains.
Receiving efficiency and offensive balance
Dallas averaged 15.4 yards per reception compared with Philadelphia’s 10.7. That is a difference of 4.7 yards per catch based on the supplied team receiving totals.
Philadelphia recorded more catches, with 27 compared with Dallas’ 23. Yet the Cowboys gained more total receiving yards and scored more receiving touchdowns.
This contrast highlights why reception totals alone do not tell the full story. A team can complete more short or intermediate passes and still produce fewer yards than an opponent whose completions generate larger gains.
Dallas’ receiving efficiency was a central feature of its comeback.
Defensive Player Stats: Tackles, Sacks, and Interceptions
Defense mattered in this game even though the final score featured more than 40 combined points. Philadelphia recorded an interception, while both teams finished with one sack. The Eagles also recorded more total tackles, but that number alone does not establish which defense performed better.
Philadelphia Eagles defensive leaders
| Player | Total tackles | Solo tackles | Sacks | Passes defended |
| Zack Baun | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Reed Blankenship | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Cooper DeJean | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
Philadelphia’s team defense recorded 70 total tackles, 36 solo tackles, one sack, two tackles for loss, four passes defended, and six quarterback hits. The Eagles also recorded one interception.
Zack Baun led Philadelphia with nine total tackles. His contribution was important in terms of defensive activity, although the supplied statistics do not credit him with a sack or tackle for loss.
Blankenship recorded eight tackles and an interception. His takeaway was a significant defensive play because it interrupted a Dallas passing possession and gave Philadelphia an opportunity to regain control.
Cooper DeJean added seven tackles, including five solo tackles, and one pass defended.
Dallas Cowboys defensive leaders
| Player | Total tackles | Solo tackles | Sacks | QB hits |
| Reddy Steward | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Donovan Wilson | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Osa Odighizuwa | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Dallas finished with 59 total tackles, 35 solo tackles, one sack, two tackles for loss, three passes defended, and six quarterback hits. The supplied statistics list no Cowboys interceptions.
Reddy Steward led Dallas with six tackles. Donovan Wilson recorded five, all of them solo tackles.
Osa Odighizuwa delivered one of the most noticeable individual pass-rushing performances. He recorded a sack, one tackle for loss, and four quarterback hits. Although the total sack count was only one for Dallas, Odighizuwa’s pressure figures show that he repeatedly affected the quarterback’s pocket.
Why the tackle totals need context
Philadelphia’s 70 tackles exceeded Dallas’ 59, but a higher tackle count is not automatically proof of better defense.
Tackles can accumulate when an opponent completes more plays, sustains longer possessions, or runs more offensive snaps. The number is useful, but it must be considered alongside yardage allowed, scoring, turnovers, and pressure.
Dallas surrendered 21 points, all before halftime, but held Philadelphia scoreless after the break. That second-half result is a meaningful defensive outcome, even though the supplied box score does not provide enough information to attribute it to a single player or specific adjustment.
Philadelphia, meanwhile, forced an interception but could not prevent Prescott and the Cowboys from producing 24 points overall.
Pass rush and quarterback pressure
Both teams recorded six quarterback hits, according to the supplied team totals. That suggests the defenses registered similar numbers of direct hits on the quarterback, although the quality and timing of those pressures may have differed.
The Eagles recorded one sack, and Dallas also recorded one. Odighizuwa accounted for the Cowboys’ listed sack.
The pressure statistics are useful because sacks alone do not capture every disruptive defensive play. A quarterback can be forced to hurry a throw, move off his intended spot, or release the ball early without being brought down.
However, the available data does not identify the result of every pressure, so it would be inaccurate to claim that one team’s quarterback pressure was more effective on every possession.
Turnovers and Fumbles: A Critical Part of the Game
Turnovers are especially important in close divisional games because they can change possession without requiring the defense to stop an offense through normal play.
The supplied statistics list two fumbles for each team. Philadelphia lost both of its fumbles, while Dallas lost one.
| Turnover category | Eagles | Cowboys |
| Fumbles | 2 | 2 |
| Fumbles lost | 2 | 1 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions recorded by defense | 1 | 0 |
| Listed offensive turnovers | 2 fumbles lost plus 0 interceptions | 1 fumble lost plus 1 interception |
The last row reflects the supplied player and team data rather than an independently verified official turnover summary. It should not be interpreted as a substitute for a complete play-by-play review.
Philadelphia’s lost fumbles
The source lists one lost fumble for Saquon Barkley and one for Xavier Gipson. Those turnovers were costly in statistical terms because Philadelphia surrendered possession without the opponent needing to force a punt or complete a scoring drive.
The data also lists a fumble recovery for Zack Baun, but the supplied team-level figures do not fully explain the sequence of every fumble and recovery. For that reason, the exact possession-by-possession impact should not be inferred from the totals alone.
Still, the broader point is clear: ball security is an essential part of evaluating an offense. Even a productive passing performance can be undermined when the team gives the ball away.
Dallas also had turnover problems
Prescott threw one interception to Blankenship. KaVontae Turpin was also credited with a lost fumble, while Jake Ferguson had a fumble that was not listed as lost.
The Cowboys therefore were not mistake-free. Their victory came despite an interception and a lost fumble.
This distinction matters when interpreting the final score. Dallas did not win because it completely avoided errors. It won while producing more passing yards, more rushing yards, and a higher total score.
What the turnover numbers reveal
Philadelphia had two listed lost fumbles and no interceptions thrown. Dallas had one listed lost fumble and one interception thrown. Both teams therefore had two turnovers when those categories are added.
The available figures suggest that the turnover totals were even, although the types of turnovers differed. This is another reason not to explain the result with a single statistic.
The Cowboys’ greater offensive yardage and second-half scoring production provide a more complete explanation of the outcome than turnovers alone.
Special Teams Stats: Kicking, Punting, and Returns
Special teams contributed to the overall field-position picture. The supplied box score lists different results for the two kickers, along with useful return and punting figures.
Kicking comparison
| Statistic | Jake Elliott, Eagles | Brandon Aubrey, Cowboys |
| Field goals made | 0 | 1 |
| Field goals attempted | 1 | 2 |
| Field-goal percentage | 0% | 50% |
| Extra points made | 3 | 3 |
| Extra points attempted | 3 | 3 |
| Total kicking points | 3 | 6 |
Aubrey made one of two field-goal attempts, with his longest successful field goal listed at 42 yards. Elliott went 0-for-1 on field goals but made all three extra points.
Aubrey’s six kicking points compared with Elliott’s three. The three-point difference equals the final margin of victory, but it would be misleading to say that kicking alone decided the game. The entire scoring sequence, including touchdowns and extra points, determines the final result.
Punting statistics
| Statistic | Braden Mann, Eagles | Bryan Anger, Cowboys |
| Punts | 5 | 3 |
| Total punt yards | 250 | 168 |
| Average punt distance | 50.0 yards | 56.0 yards |
| Longest punt | 58 yards | 62 yards |
| Punts inside the 20 | 3 | 1 |
| Touchbacks | 0 | 0 |
Mann averaged 50.0 yards per punt and placed three punts inside the 20-yard line. Anger averaged 56.0 yards and recorded a longer punt of 62 yards.
The Eagles punted five times, compared with three punts for Dallas. That difference is consistent with the Cowboys’ greater offensive production, although punt totals alone cannot establish how well each team handled field position.
The Eagles had more punts inside the 20, while the Cowboys had the higher average distance. Both figures offer useful context, but neither should be treated as a complete measure of punting performance.
Kick returns and punt returns
| Category | Player | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Eagles kick returns | Will Shipley | 4 | 106 | 26.5 |
| Cowboys kick returns | KaVontae Turpin | 3 | 85 | 28.3 |
| Eagles punt returns | Xavier Gipson | 2 | 19 | 9.5 |
| Cowboys punt returns | KaVontae Turpin | 2 | 1 | 0.5 |
Shipley returned four kicks for 106 yards, averaging 26.5 yards per return. Turpin recorded 85 yards on three kick returns, averaging 28.3 yards.
On punt returns, Gipson averaged 9.5 yards over two returns. Turpin’s two punt returns produced just one yard in total.
These numbers demonstrate that return performance varies by type of kick. A strong kick-return average does not necessarily translate into similar results on punts, which often involve different hang times, coverage patterns, and return opportunities.
Team Statistical Comparison: Eagles vs Cowboys
The most useful way to evaluate this game is to compare the major team-level categories side by side.
| Statistic | Philadelphia Eagles | Dallas Cowboys |
| Final score | 21 | 24 |
| Passing completions | 27 | 23 |
| Passing attempts | 39 | 36 |
| Player passing yards | 289 | 354 |
| Team passing yards as separately listed | 276 | 348 |
| Rushing attempts | 18 | 31 |
| Rushing yards | 63 | 125 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Receiving yards in supplied player totals | 289 | 354 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Total tackles | 70 | 59 |
| Sacks | 1 | 1 |
| Quarterback hits | 6 | 6 |
| Interceptions recorded | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles lost | 2 | 1 |
| Field goals made | 0 | 1 |
Passing and receiving totals are reproduced as supplied. The player-level passing figures and receiving totals differ from the separately listed team passing-yard figures. Those discrepancies should be checked against the official box score before using the figures for advanced statistical calculations.
Passing offense favored Dallas
Dallas had the larger passing yardage total at both the quarterback and listed receiving levels. Prescott’s 354 passing yards exceeded Hurts’ 289, while the Cowboys’ listed average of 9.8 yards per attempt was above Philadelphia’s 7.4.
That production gave Dallas an important advantage in moving the ball through the air.
Rushing offense favored Dallas
The Cowboys’ 125 rushing yards compared with Philadelphia’s 63. Dallas ran the ball 31 times, while Philadelphia had 18 rushing attempts.
The Eagles did record two rushing touchdowns, both from Hurts. However, Dallas gained more than twice Philadelphia’s rushing yardage.
Philadelphia had more tackles and an interception
The Eagles recorded 70 tackles and one interception. Dallas had 59 tackles and no interceptions recorded in the supplied data.
Those numbers show that Philadelphia made defensive plays, but the Eagles did not turn those contributions into a winning result. Dallas’ scoring output and ability to keep Philadelphia off the scoreboard after halftime were more decisive to the final outcome.
Why the Cowboys Won: Five Key Statistical Takeaways
The final result becomes easier to understand when the individual performances are connected to the game’s broader statistical patterns.
1. Dallas generated more total offensive yardage
Prescott’s 354 passing yards and Williams’ 87 rushing yards illustrate how Dallas produced through multiple parts of its offense. The Cowboys were not dependent on short passing completions alone.
Philadelphia’s passing game was productive, but its 63 rushing yards limited its ground contribution. Dallas’ ability to gain 125 yards on the ground gave the offense another way to move the ball.
2. George Pickens delivered a major receiving performance
Pickens recorded 146 yards and a touchdown on nine catches. His 16.2 yards per reception was higher than Brown’s 13.8-yard average.
His production was particularly valuable because Dallas needed to generate enough offense to recover from a 21-7 halftime deficit.
3. Jalen Hurts supplied Philadelphia’s rushing touchdowns
Hurts accounted for two rushing touchdowns and one passing touchdown. His individual scoring contribution helped Philadelphia establish a 14-point first-quarter lead.
However, the Eagles did not score in the third or fourth quarter. The difference between their strong first-half production and their scoreless second half was central to the result.
4. Dallas maintained a more balanced rushing attack
Williams’ 20 carries helped Dallas record 31 team rushing attempts. Davis also contributed 24 yards on only three carries.
Philadelphia’s ground game was less productive outside Hurts’ rushing contribution. Barkley averaged just 2.2 yards per carry, making it difficult for the Eagles to rely on their leading running back for consistent yardage.
5. The second-half scoring pattern decided the outcome
Philadelphia scored 21 points in the first half but none afterward. Dallas scored seven points in the second quarter, seven in the third, and 10 in the fourth.
That 17-point second-half contribution was enough to overcome the Eagles’ early lead. It is the clearest statistical summary of how the Cowboys won the game.
Game Analysis: What These Player Stats Mean for Future Matchups
A single box score cannot predict the result of a future game, but it can reveal areas that deserve closer attention when these teams meet again.
What Philadelphia can learn from the performance
The Eagles’ passing efficiency and Hurts’ ability to score on the ground were positive signs. Brown and Smith combined for 199 receiving yards, demonstrating that Philadelphia could generate significant production from its leading receivers.
The most obvious areas for review are rushing efficiency, ball security, and second-half scoring.
Philadelphia’s running backs did not produce much yardage on their carries, while the supplied statistics credit the team with two lost fumbles. The offense also failed to score in the final 30 minutes.
Those figures point to three useful questions for film review:
- Could the offensive line create more consistent rushing lanes?
- Could the offense protect the ball more effectively during high-pressure situations?
- Could Philadelphia adjust its approach after halftime to sustain drives and convert scoring opportunities?
These are questions suggested by the statistics, not confirmed explanations for individual plays. A complete answer would require reviewing the game film and play-by-play record.
What Dallas can build on
Dallas demonstrated that its passing game could produce explosive gains. Prescott’s 9.8 yards per attempt, Pickens’ 146 receiving yards, and Lamb’s 48-yard longest catch all show the potential for significant passing plays.
The Cowboys also gained 125 rushing yards. Williams’ workload gave the offense a productive ground component rather than forcing Prescott to carry the entire attack.
Still, Dallas had areas to examine. Prescott threw an interception, and the team lost a fumble. The Cowboys also made only one of two field-goal attempts.
Future improvement would involve maintaining the passing efficiency while reducing avoidable turnovers and improving consistency on scoring attempts.
Why the halftime adjustment matters
The scoring sequence suggests that the two offenses experienced very different second halves. Dallas added 17 points after halftime, while Philadelphia added none.
That is a meaningful observation, but it does not establish exactly why the difference occurred. Potential factors in football include play selection, defensive coverage, pressure, field position, and execution on third downs.
Without complete play-by-play and film analysis, it would be inaccurate to attribute the comeback to one particular tactical adjustment. What can be established from the supplied figures is that Dallas executed well enough after halftime to outscore Philadelphia by 17 points.
How to Read NFL Match Player Stats Correctly
For readers comparing performances across NFL games, several statistical principles make box scores more useful.
Passing yards and passing efficiency are different
Passing yards measure total yardage credited to a quarterback. Yards per attempt divide passing yardage by attempts, giving a rough indication of how much production the offense generated for each throw.
Prescott’s 354 passing yards and 9.8 yards per attempt show both substantial volume and strong production per attempt. Hurts’ 289 yards and 7.4 yards per attempt show a productive passing performance, but one with a lower average gain.
Completion percentage should also be considered. Hurts completed a larger share of his attempts, but Prescott gained more yards per attempt. Neither statistic should be interpreted without the others.
Rushing averages need workload context
A player averaging eight yards per carry may look more efficient than a player averaging four yards per carry. However, the number of attempts matters.
Davis averaged eight yards across three carries, while Williams averaged 4.4 yards across 20 carries. Williams’ larger workload makes his contribution important to evaluating Dallas’ ability to sustain a rushing attack.
A small number of carries can produce a high average because of one or two long runs. A larger workload gives a better view of how consistently a player gained yardage.
Receiving totals should be considered with targets
Targets show how frequently a receiver was selected as a passing option. Receptions show how many of those opportunities resulted in catches.
Pickens’ nine catches on nine targets were highly productive. Brown caught eight of 10 targets, while Smith caught six of 11.
These numbers help explain the roles of different receivers, but they do not reveal every detail of their performance. Route quality, defensive coverage, drops, and the difficulty of individual catches require additional context.
Defensive stats require more than tackle counts
Tackles, sacks, quarterback hits, interceptions, and passes defended measure different parts of defensive performance.
Baun led Philadelphia with nine tackles, while Odighizuwa produced the most notable listed pressure statistics for Dallas. Blankenship’s interception was a separate type of impact because it ended a passing possession.
A strong defensive assessment should consider the timing of these plays and the amount of yardage or scoring they prevented. The box score provides the foundation, but film and play-by-play analysis can explain the full context.
Source Verification and Statistical Accuracy
The supplied data identifies ESPN as the source for the game’s box score. Readers who need to verify individual figures can consult the official ESPN box score.
There are a few details worth keeping in mind when interpreting the supplied statistics.
First, passing-yard totals differ by category. Hurts is listed with 289 passing yards, while Philadelphia’s separate team passing summary reports 276 yards. Prescott is listed with 354 passing yards, while Dallas’ team passing summary reports 348 yards.
Second, the receiving totals match the listed player passing totals. The Eagles’ listed receiving total is 289 yards, and Dallas’ is 354 yards. These values are retained as supplied rather than silently replaced with the separate team passing totals.
Third, the source’s game heading and week designation should be checked before publication. The supplied text identifies November 24, 2025, while also labeling the game Week 7. Those details are reproduced from the source data, but the week designation may require verification against the official NFL schedule.
Fourth, the supplied data is not a substitute for a full play-by-play audit. It supports the final score, player statistics, and quarter-by-quarter scoring comparison presented here. It does not independently establish the cause of every scoring drive or the tactical reason for each team’s second-half performance.
These distinctions matter for an informational sports article. Accurate reporting requires preserving the source’s figures, explaining discrepancies, and avoiding unsupported conclusions.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Philadelphia Eagles vs Dallas Cowboys game?
The Dallas Cowboys defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 24-21 on November 24, 2025. Philadelphia scored 21 points in the first half, while Dallas scored 17 points after halftime to complete the comeback.
2. How many passing yards did Dak Prescott record against the Eagles?
Dak Prescott recorded 354 passing yards, two passing touchdowns, and one interception on 23 completions from 36 attempts. His listed passer rating was 103.2.
3. How did Jalen Hurts perform against the Cowboys?
Hurts completed 27 of 39 passes for 289 yards, one passing touchdown, and no interceptions. He also rushed seven times for 33 yards and two touchdowns.
4. Who was the leading receiver in the game?
George Pickens led all listed receivers with 146 receiving yards and one touchdown on nine receptions. A.J. Brown led Philadelphia with 110 yards and one touchdown on eight catches.
5. Which team had more rushing yards?
Dallas recorded 125 team rushing yards on 31 carries, compared with Philadelphia’s 63 yards on 18 carries. Javonte Williams led Dallas with 87 rushing yards, while Hurts led Philadelphia with 33.
6. Which defensive player recorded an interception?
Philadelphia safety Reed Blankenship recorded one interception. Dallas had no interceptions recorded in the supplied box-score data.
Conclusion
The Philadelphia Eagles vs Dallas Cowboys match player stats reveal a contest decided by offensive production and second-half execution. Dallas won 24-21 after overcoming a 14-point deficit, using Dak Prescott’s 354 passing yards, George Pickens’ 146 receiving yards, and Javonte Williams’ 87 rushing yards to build a more productive overall offense.
Philadelphia also had impressive individual performances. Jalen Hurts threw for 289 yards and scored two rushing touchdowns, while A.J. Brown contributed 110 receiving yards and a touchdown. The Eagles’ early scoring showed their offensive potential, but their failure to score after halftime proved costly.
The most significant statistical differences were Dallas’ 62-yard advantage in team rushing, its higher passing-yard total, and its 17-0 scoring advantage in the second half. Philadelphia recorded more tackles and an interception, but those defensive contributions were not enough to preserve the lead.
Taken together, the figures show why individual statistics need to be examined alongside team performance, turnovers, scoring patterns, and efficiency. The final score captures the result, while the player and team numbers explain how the Cowboys earned the victory.
