Las Vegas Raiders vs Chargers Match Player Stats
Las Vegas Raiders vs Chargers match player stats tell a much deeper story than the final score alone. In the September 16, 2025 meeting, the Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 20-9, but the result was shaped by several individual performances, including Justin Herbert’s efficient passing, Geno Smith’s three interceptions, Maxx Crosby’s two sacks, and the Chargers’ ability to create more explosive plays through the air.
This game is a useful example of why player statistics need to be read together rather than as isolated numbers. A quarterback’s completion percentage, for example, does not fully explain a game until turnovers, sacks, passing efficiency, and scoring production are considered. The same is true for rushing and receiving statistics. A player can have modest yardage but still make an important contribution through field position, first downs, blocking, or defensive pressure.
The numbers supplied for this matchup provide enough detail to examine the game from several angles. Passing, rushing, receiving, defensive production, turnovers, special teams, and efficiency all point toward the same broad conclusion: Los Angeles controlled the most important statistical areas while Las Vegas struggled to turn opportunities into points.
Las Vegas Raiders vs Chargers Match Player Stats at a Glance
The most important numbers from the game are summarized below.
| Category | Los Angeles Chargers | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Final Score | 20 | 9 |
| Passing Yards | 242 | 180 |
| Rushing Yards | 81 | 68 |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 3 |
| Team Receptions | 19 | 24 |
| Team Receiving Yards | 242 | 180 |
| Team Rushing Attempts | 26 | 19 |
| Team Sacks | 3 | 2 |
| Defensive Interceptions | 3 | 0 |
| Record After Game | 2-0 | 1-1 |
The most obvious difference is not actually total yardage. Los Angeles produced 323 combined passing and rushing yards, while Las Vegas produced 248.
The larger difference was how effectively each team converted its production into winning possessions.
The Chargers scored twice through the passing game and protected the football through the air. The Raiders, meanwhile, threw three interceptions and did not record a passing touchdown.
That turnover gap was decisive.
Justin Herbert’s Passing Performance
Justin Herbert completed 19 of 27 passes for 242 yards and two touchdowns.
His completion rate was approximately 70.4%, which is a strong mark for a quarterback who was also pressured enough to take two sacks.
Herbert’s passing line included:
- 19 completions
- 27 attempts
- 242 passing yards
- 9.0 yards per attempt
- 2 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 2 sacks for 6 yards
- 76.4 QBR
- 122.8 passer rating
The 9.0 yards per attempt figure is especially important.
It shows that Herbert was not simply completing short passes to accumulate yardage. His average completion and overall passing efficiency allowed Los Angeles to generate meaningful gains without needing an extremely high volume of attempts.
His 122.8 passer rating also stands out when compared with Geno Smith’s 37.0 rating.
Why Herbert’s Efficiency Mattered
Herbert attempted only 27 passes, yet he produced 242 yards and two touchdowns.
That means the Chargers did not need a high-volume passing attack to move the scoreboard.
The receiving distribution also helped. Quentin Johnston produced 71 yards and a touchdown, while Keenan Allen added 61 yards and another touchdown. Ladd McConkey contributed another 48 yards.
This gave Herbert several productive options rather than forcing the offense to depend on one receiver.
Another important detail is that Herbert contributed 31 rushing yards on nine carries. His rushing numbers were not spectacular, but they added another layer to the Chargers’ offense.
Geno Smith’s Struggles Defined the Raiders’ Offense
Geno Smith finished with 24 completions on 43 attempts for 180 yards.
On the surface, completing 24 passes might look productive. However, the broader numbers reveal the problem.
Smith recorded:
- 24 completions
- 43 attempts
- 180 yards
- 4.2 yards per attempt
- 0 touchdowns
- 3 interceptions
- 3 sacks for 30 yards
- 23.1 QBR
- 37.0 passer rating
The biggest issue was efficiency.
Smith averaged only 4.2 yards per attempt. His 43 attempts produced 180 yards, meaning Las Vegas needed a large amount of passing volume to generate relatively limited yardage.
The three interceptions made the situation even worse.
The Turnover Problem
The Raiders did not throw a single passing touchdown, while Smith gave the Chargers three interceptions.
That created a major possession advantage for Los Angeles.
The Chargers’ defense recorded interceptions from Daiyan Henley, Tony Jefferson, and Donte Jackson. None of those interceptions became defensive touchdowns, but they still ended Raiders possessions and gave Los Angeles additional opportunities to control the game.
This is one of the clearest lessons from the Las Vegas Raiders vs Chargers match player stats: volume does not necessarily equal offensive success.
Smith attempted 16 more passes than Herbert.
Herbert produced 62 more passing yards.
More importantly, Herbert threw two touchdowns without an interception, while Smith threw three interceptions without a touchdown.
Receiving Comparison
The receiving statistics provide another major contrast.
Los Angeles recorded 19 receptions for 242 yards and two touchdowns on 27 targets.
Las Vegas recorded 24 receptions for 180 yards and zero touchdowns on 43 targets.
That difference is extremely revealing.
The Raiders actually completed five more passes than the Chargers. Yet Los Angeles gained 62 more receiving yards.
The reason was efficiency.
Chargers Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Quentin Johnston | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 1 | 7 |
| Keenan Allen | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 1 | 7 |
| Ladd McConkey | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 0 | 5 |
| Tre’ Harris | 2 | 34 | 17.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Najee Harris | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Will Dissly | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Omarion Hampton | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 |
Quentin Johnston was particularly effective.
He caught only three passes, but those receptions produced 71 yards. His 23.7 yards per reception was the best mark among the Chargers’ primary receivers.
His 60-yard longest reception was also the game’s biggest receiving play.
Keenan Allen’s Reliable Production
Keenan Allen caught five passes for 61 yards and a touchdown.
His 12.2 yards per reception was less explosive than Johnston’s number, but his five receptions provided consistent production.
Allen also had seven targets, tying Johnston for the team lead.
This combination of volume and efficiency made Allen one of Herbert’s most dependable options.
Ladd McConkey’s Role
Ladd McConkey also caught five passes, producing 48 yards.
His numbers were not as explosive as Johnston’s, but he helped maintain balance in the passing attack.
The Chargers therefore had three receivers with at least 48 receiving yards.
That distribution makes it harder for a defense to focus entirely on one target.
Raiders Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Jakobi Meyers | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 0 | 12 |
| Brock Bowers | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 0 | 8 |
| Dont’e Thornton Jr. | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dylan Laube | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 2 |
| Zamir White | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 3 |
| Tre Tucker | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 | 8 |
| Michael Mayer | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 2 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 4 |
Jakobi Meyers led Las Vegas with six receptions and 68 yards.
He also received 12 targets, the highest total among Raiders players.
The issue was that those targets did not result in a touchdown, and the overall passing attack averaged only 7.5 yards per completed reception.
Brock Bowers finished with five receptions for 38 yards on eight targets. He was involved regularly, but his production was not enough to compensate for the team’s passing inefficiency.
The Explosive Play Difference
One of the most useful ways to interpret this matchup is by looking at explosive receiving plays.
The Chargers had:
- Quentin Johnston: 60-yard reception
- Keenan Allen: 25-yard reception
- Tre’ Harris: 24-yard reception
- Ladd McConkey: 19-yard reception
The Raiders’ longest completed pass was 25 yards by Jakobi Meyers.
That is a major distinction.
The Chargers demonstrated an ability to create large chunks of yardage through the passing game. Las Vegas moved the ball, but the offense struggled to generate the same level of explosiveness.
This helps explain why the Raiders could complete 24 passes yet finish with only 180 passing yards.
Rushing Statistics
Neither team produced a dominant rushing performance.
Los Angeles ran the ball 26 times for 81 yards, averaging 3.1 yards per carry.
Las Vegas ran 19 times for 68 yards, averaging 3.6 yards per carry.
The Raiders actually had the better rushing average, but Los Angeles generated more total rushing yards because it had seven additional attempts.
Chargers Rushing Leaders
Justin Herbert led the Chargers in rushing with nine carries for 31 yards.
Najee Harris carried eight times for 28 yards.
Omarion Hampton had eight carries for 24 yards.
The Chargers’ longest rushing play was 15 yards.
No Chargers player scored a rushing touchdown.
This was not a ground-game dominated victory. Instead, the Chargers combined moderate rushing production with a much more efficient passing attack.
Raiders Rushing Leaders
Ashton Jeanty led Las Vegas with 11 carries for 43 yards.
Geno Smith added 20 yards on five carries.
Tre Tucker contributed seven yards on one carry.
Zamir White recorded two carries for minus-2 yards.
Jeanty’s 43 rushing yards were the Raiders’ highest individual rushing total.
His 13-yard run was also the team’s longest rushing play.
The Raiders averaged 3.6 yards per carry as a team, which was slightly better than Los Angeles, but the advantage did not translate into enough offensive scoring.
Ashton Jeanty’s All-Purpose Contribution
Ashton Jeanty deserves separate attention because he contributed in both phases of the Raiders’ offense.
He rushed 11 times for 43 yards and caught three passes for one yard.
That gave him 44 yards from scrimmage.
His rushing average was 3.9 yards per carry, making him the Raiders’ most productive runner by total rushing yardage.
However, his receiving production was extremely limited.
Three receptions produced only one receiving yard.
That suggests his biggest contribution came on the ground rather than as a receiving outlet in this matchup.
Defensive Player Stats
The defensive numbers help explain why the final score stayed relatively low.
Los Angeles recorded three sacks and three interceptions.
Las Vegas recorded two sacks but no interceptions.
That turnover advantage was enormous.
Chargers Defensive Leaders
Daiyan Henley led Los Angeles with 10 tackles.
His defensive line included:
- 10 tackles
- 7 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 2 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 1 quarterback hit
- 1 interception
That is an extremely active statistical performance.
Tarheeb Still recorded nine tackles and seven solo tackles, along with two passes defended.
Derwin James Jr. recorded seven tackles and two passes defended.
Tuli Tuipulotu finished with five tackles, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
The Chargers’ defense therefore received contributions from multiple levels rather than depending on one player.
Daiyan Henley’s Complete Defensive Impact
Henley’s performance stands out because he affected the game in several ways.
Ten tackles gave him the highest tackle total among Chargers defenders.
- His sack added direct pressure on the quarterback.
- His two tackles for loss showed effectiveness near the line of scrimmage.
- His two passes defended demonstrated involvement against the passing game.
And his interception gave Los Angeles another turnover.
That combination is more informative than looking at tackles alone.
A defender who records tackles but has no impact on passing plays can have a very different influence from someone who combines tackles with pressure and turnovers.
Henley’s statistical profile demonstrates the latter.
Maxx Crosby Remained a Major Disruptive Force
The Raiders’ defensive standout was Maxx Crosby.
Crosby recorded:
- 4 tackles
- 3 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 3 tackles for loss
- 3 quarterback hits
His four tackles were not the highest total on the Raiders, but his impact on the quarterback was significant.
Crosby accounted for both of Las Vegas’ sacks.
He also produced three quarterback hits and three tackles for loss.
That is a strong indication that the Raiders’ pass rush was capable of creating problems even though the overall defense could not generate enough turnovers.
The contrast between Crosby and the Raiders’ coverage results is important.
Las Vegas could pressure Herbert, but it did not intercept him.
Los Angeles, meanwhile, managed three interceptions of Smith.
Raiders Defensive Leaders
Devin White led the Raiders with eight tackles and six solo tackles.
Germaine Pratt recorded seven tackles and five solo tackles.
Jeremy Chinn had six tackles, all of them solo.
Isaiah Pola-Mao and Elandon Roberts each recorded five tackles.
These numbers show that Las Vegas defenders were involved consistently, but tackle volume did not translate into enough disruption.
The Raiders finished with 63 total tackles and 38 solo tackles.
Los Angeles had 64 total tackles and 41 solo tackles.
The overall tackle totals were nearly identical.
The difference came in the more decisive categories: interceptions, passing touchdowns, and quarterback efficiency.
Turnovers Were the Defining Statistical Story
If someone wanted to reduce the entire game to one statistical category, turnovers would be the strongest choice.
The Chargers intercepted Geno Smith three times.
The Raiders intercepted Justin Herbert zero times.
The Chargers therefore finished with a plus-three interception margin.
Fumbles did not reverse the situation.
Los Angeles recorded two team fumbles, including one lost fumble.
Las Vegas recorded one team fumble and did not lose it.
So the Chargers’ turnover picture was not perfect.
However, the three interceptions created a much more significant advantage than the single lost fumble could offset.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams were relatively stable for both teams.
Cameron Dicker converted both of his field-goal attempts and both extra points for eight points.
Daniel Carlson made all three of his field-goal attempts and finished with nine points.
Carlson’s longest successful field goal was 54 yards.
Dicker’s longest was 38 yards.
This is interesting because Carlson personally scored more points than Dicker even though the Raiders lost.
That demonstrates another important statistical lesson: individual scoring totals do not necessarily reflect team success.
The Raiders’ nine points included three successful field goals.
The Chargers’ 20 points included two touchdowns plus two field goals and two extra points.
The difference was the ability to finish drives with touchdowns.
Return Game Comparison
Las Vegas had four kickoff returns for 91 yards, averaging 22.8 yards per return.
Zamir White handled all four returns.
The Chargers recorded three kickoff returns for 80 yards, averaging 26.7 yards per return.
Hassan Haskins recorded two returns for 51 yards, while Derius Davis added one for 29 yards.
Davis also returned one punt for seven yards.
Tre Tucker returned one punt for 15 yards for Las Vegas.
Neither team returned a kickoff or punt for a touchdown.
The return statistics therefore did not dominate the game, but they helped establish field position.
Punting Comparison
JK Scott punted three times for 158 yards for Los Angeles.
His average was 52.7 yards, with two punts landing inside the 20-yard line.
AJ Cole punted twice for Las Vegas for 114 yards.
His average was 57.0 yards, with one inside the 20.
Cole had the higher average, while Scott had the higher total punt volume.
Again, the raw average does not tell the entire story.
Punting effectiveness depends not only on distance but also on placement and the resulting field position.
Why the Chargers Won
The final score of 20-9 can be explained through several connected statistical advantages.
1. Better Quarterback Efficiency
Herbert produced 242 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions.
Smith produced 180 yards, no touchdowns, and three interceptions.
That was the biggest difference between the offenses.
2. Better Explosive Passing
Los Angeles had a 60-yard reception from Quentin Johnston.
Las Vegas’ longest reception was 25 yards.
Explosive plays helped Los Angeles create scoring opportunities without requiring long sustained drives on every possession.
3. Turnover Advantage
Three Chargers interceptions compared with zero Raiders interceptions created a substantial possession advantage.
4. Better Scoring Efficiency
Los Angeles turned its offensive production into two passing touchdowns.
Las Vegas repeatedly settled for field goals.
Daniel Carlson was perfect on his three attempts, but field goals could not match the scoring value of two touchdowns.
5. Balanced Offensive Distribution
Los Angeles did not rely exclusively on one receiver.
Johnston, Allen, and McConkey all produced meaningful receiving numbers.
That distribution made the passing game more difficult to contain.
Why the Raiders Lost Despite Some Positive Numbers
The Raiders’ statistics were not uniformly poor.
They had:
- More completions
- A higher rushing average
- Four kickoff returns
- Three successful field goals
- Two sacks from Crosby
- Eight tackles from Devin White
- Six receptions from Meyers
The problem was that these positive elements did not connect into sustained scoring success.
The passing attack lacked efficiency.
Turnovers repeatedly ended drives.
The offense did not produce a passing touchdown.
The defense did not intercept Herbert.
That combination made it difficult for Las Vegas to overcome Los Angeles’ more efficient offensive performance.
What the Matchup Shows About Player Evaluation
Player statistics are most useful when viewed in context.
Consider Geno Smith.
A basic box score might highlight 24 completions. But that number becomes less impressive when paired with 43 attempts, 180 yards, three interceptions, zero touchdowns, and a 37.0 passer rating.
Now consider Maxx Crosby.
Four tackles might not look extraordinary in isolation. But two sacks, three tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits show that his impact was considerably larger than the tackle number alone suggests.
The same principle applies to Quentin Johnston.
Three receptions may sound modest, but 71 yards, a 23.7-yard average, and a 60-yard reception show that his limited catches had significant impact.
This is why advanced analysis should always connect volume, efficiency, and impact.
Comparing the Quarterbacks Directly
| Statistic | Justin Herbert | Geno Smith |
| Completions | 19 | 24 |
| Attempts | 27 | 43 |
| Completion Rate | 70.4% | 55.8% |
| Passing Yards | 242 | 180 |
| Yards/Attempt | 9.0 | 4.2 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 3 |
| Sacks | 2 | 3 |
| QBR | 76.4 | 23.1 |
| Passer Rating | 122.8 | 37.0 |
The table makes the difference clear.
Smith completed more passes, but Herbert was considerably more efficient.
Herbert needed 27 attempts to produce 242 yards.
Smith needed 43 attempts to produce 180.
That is the clearest statistical indicator of the offensive gap.
Comparing the Team Offenses
Los Angeles finished with 81 rushing yards and 242 passing yards.
Las Vegas finished with 68 rushing yards and 180 passing yards.
The Chargers therefore produced 75 more yards of combined rushing and passing offense.
Los Angeles also averaged 12.7 yards per reception.
Las Vegas averaged 7.5.
That 5.2-yard difference per reception is substantial.
It indicates that the Chargers were creating more meaningful yardage whenever they completed passes.
What Fans Should Watch in Similar Matchups
When evaluating future Raiders and Chargers games, several statistical categories are particularly useful.
Quarterback Yards Per Attempt
This can reveal whether a passing offense is actually generating meaningful yardage or simply accumulating completions.
Turnover Margin
Interceptions and lost fumbles can change the outcome of a close game quickly.
Explosive Plays
Look for receptions or runs of 20 or more yards. These plays can dramatically change field position and scoring probability.
Red-Zone Results
A team that consistently reaches scoring range but settles for field goals may struggle against an opponent that converts those same opportunities into touchdowns.
Pressure Without Turnovers
Sacks are valuable, but pressure becomes even more powerful when it produces interceptions, fumbles, or stalled drives.
How to Read the Stats Without Overreacting
One game should not be used to define an entire player or team.
For example, Geno Smith’s three interceptions were highly damaging in this matchup, but evaluating a quarterback properly requires looking at a larger sample.
The same applies to Herbert’s 122.8 passer rating.
It was an excellent performance according to the supplied statistics, but one strong game does not automatically establish a season-long trend.
A useful approach is to compare:
- The player’s current game
- His previous games
- His season average
- His opponent-adjusted performance
- Turnover and efficiency trends
- Game situation and score
This prevents a single box score from becoming a misleading narrative.
Key Takeaways From the Player Statistics
The most important conclusions from this matchup are straightforward.
Justin Herbert was the more efficient quarterback. He completed 70.4% of his passes, averaged 9.0 yards per attempt, threw two touchdowns, and avoided interceptions.
Geno Smith struggled with efficiency and turnovers. He completed 24 passes but needed 43 attempts to gain 180 yards and threw three interceptions.
Quentin Johnston provided the biggest explosive receiving play. His 60-yard catch helped give the Chargers a major advantage in big-play production.
Jakobi Meyers was the Raiders’ leading receiver. He caught six passes for 68 yards on 12 targets.
Ashton Jeanty led the Raiders in rushing. He carried 11 times for 43 yards.
Maxx Crosby was the Raiders’ most disruptive defender. His two sacks, three tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits made him a constant factor.
Daiyan Henley produced an all-around defensive performance. He led the Chargers with 10 tackles while also recording a sack, two tackles for loss, two passes defended, and an interception.
The Chargers won the turnover battle decisively. Three interceptions without giving one away through the passing game was a major factor.
Special teams were not enough to overcome offensive differences. Carlson converted all three field goals for Las Vegas, but the Raiders needed touchdowns to keep pace.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Chargers and Raiders?
The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 20-9 on September 16, 2025.
Who was the leading passer in the game?
Justin Herbert was the leading passer. He completed 19 of 27 passes for 242 yards, two touchdowns, and zero interceptions.
How many interceptions did Geno Smith throw?
Geno Smith threw three interceptions. Daiyan Henley, Tony Jefferson, and Donte Jackson recorded interceptions for the Chargers.
Who led the Raiders in rushing?
Ashton Jeanty led Las Vegas with 11 carries for 43 yards and averaged 3.9 yards per carry.
Who was the Raiders’ leading receiver?
Jakobi Meyers led the Raiders with six receptions for 68 yards on 12 targets.
How many sacks did Maxx Crosby record?
Maxx Crosby recorded two sacks, three tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits.
Conclusion
The Las Vegas Raiders vs Chargers match player stats show a game decided less by overall possession volume and more by efficiency, explosive plays, quarterback performance, and turnovers.
Los Angeles produced 242 passing yards and 81 rushing yards while scoring 20 points. Justin Herbert was efficient with 19 completions on 27 attempts, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. Quentin Johnston and Keenan Allen provided touchdown receptions, while the Chargers’ defense created three interceptions.
Las Vegas had some individual positives. Ashton Jeanty led the rushing attack, Jakobi Meyers was productive as a receiver, Daniel Carlson converted all three field-goal attempts, and Maxx Crosby generated two sacks. However, the Raiders could not turn those individual contributions into enough offensive production.
The most important statistical contrast was at quarterback. Herbert produced more passing yards with substantially fewer attempts and no interceptions, while Smith needed 43 attempts to gain 180 yards and threw three interceptions. That efficiency gap, combined with Los Angeles’ superior explosive passing and turnover creation, explains why the Chargers left with the 20-9 victory.
For readers who want to verify official NFL game information and continue tracking league statistics, the NFL official website is an appropriate authoritative source.
