LA Clippers vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats

The la clippers vs utah jazz match player stats from January 2, 2026, tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. The LA Clippers defeated the Utah Jazz 118-101 at Intuit Dome, but the numbers reveal how the game developed, which players controlled the action, where Utah struggled, and why Kawhi Leonard’s outstanding scoring performance ultimately separated the teams.

Leonard finished with 45 points in 39 minutes, shooting 16-of-29 from the field and 6-of-16 from three-point range. James Harden added 20 points and 7 assists, while Nicolas Batum supplied efficient perimeter scoring with four three-pointers. John Collins also made a major impact on the glass, collecting 11 rebounds in only 20 minutes.

Utah had several strong individual performances of its own. Kyle Anderson scored 22 points while shooting 8-of-10 from the field and added 8 rebounds, Isaiah Collier recorded 16 points and 10 assists, and Brice Sensabaugh contributed 20 points. Yet Utah’s overall shooting, turnovers, and inability to consistently match Los Angeles on the glass proved costly.

This breakdown examines the complete player statistics, team numbers, quarter-by-quarter progression, efficiency differences, individual performances, and the tactical lessons that can be taken from the game.

LA Clippers vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup took place on January 2, 2026, at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California. Los Angeles entered the game with a 12-21 record and an 8-8 home record. Utah also entered at 12-21, but its away record stood at 4-10.

The Clippers ultimately won 118-101.

That 17-point margin is significant, but it does not fully describe how the game unfolded. Utah actually had stretches where it matched Los Angeles offensively. The Jazz scored 33 points in the second quarter and 31 in the third, showing that they could create scoring opportunities against the Clippers.

The major problem was consistency.

Los Angeles opened the game with 31 points while holding Utah to just 17. The Clippers then closed the game with 36 points in the fourth quarter while Utah managed only 20.

Final Score by Quarter

Quarter	Utah Jazz	LA Clippers
1st	17	31
2nd	33	22
3rd	31	29
4th	20	36
Final	101	118

The table shows an important feature of the contest. The Clippers did not dominate every quarter. Utah actually outscored Los Angeles 33-22 in the second quarter.

However, Los Angeles won the opening quarter by 14 points and the fourth quarter by 16 points. Those two periods created the decisive separation.

How Kawhi Leonard Controlled the Game

The clearest individual story in the la clippers vs utah jazz match player stats is Kawhi Leonard’s 45-point performance.

Leonard played 39 minutes and finished with:

• 45 points
• 16-of-29 field goals
• 6-of-16 three-pointers
• 7-of-9 free throws
• 7 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 3 turnovers
• 2 steals
• 2 blocks
• Plus-8 plus/minus

The scoring total immediately stands out, but his efficiency and shot volume provide more context.

Leonard attempted 29 field goals, which means Los Angeles consistently trusted him to create and finish possessions. He converted 16 of those attempts, giving him a field goal percentage of roughly 55.2 percent.

He also made six three-pointers.

That combination created a difficult defensive problem for Utah. Leonard was not relying on one type of shot. He could score from the perimeter, attack inside, and reach the free throw line.

Leonard’s Scoring Efficiency

Leonard’s 16 made field goals accounted for 32 points by themselves. His six made three-pointers added another 18 points, while his seven free throws brought his total to 45.

His shooting line was therefore:

16 × 2 = 32 points from two-point field goals

6 × 3 = 18 points from three-point field goals

7 × 1 = 7 free throw points

Total = 57?

That simple breakdown would double-count the three-point makes because the 16 field goals already include the six three-pointers.

The correct calculation is:

10 two-point field goals × 2 = 20

6 three-point field goals × 3 = 18

7 free throws = 7

Total = 45 points

This illustrates why reading a box score carefully matters. A player’s field goal total alone does not explain the value of his shot distribution.

James Harden’s Playmaking Role

James Harden provided a different form of offensive influence.

He finished with 20 points, 7 assists, and only 1 turnover in 29 minutes.

His complete line was:

• 20 points
• 5-of-14 field goals
• 1-of-6 three-pointers
• 9-of-11 free throws
• 3 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 1 turnover
• Plus-5

Harden did not have Leonard’s scoring efficiency from the field, but his playmaking helped organize the offense.

The seven assists are particularly important when viewed alongside his single turnover. That gives Harden a 7-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio in this game.

He also attempted 11 free throws and made nine. Even without a high three-point total, he generated points by putting pressure on the defense and getting to the line.

This is one of the most useful lessons from the box score: scoring and offensive control are not always represented by the same statistic.

Leonard was the primary scoring force.

Harden was an important creator and secondary scorer.

The combination made Los Angeles difficult to defend.

John Collins Made a Major Impact in Limited Minutes

John Collins played only 20 minutes but collected 11 rebounds.

His statistics were:

• 8 points
• 2-of-3 field goals
• 0-of-1 three-pointers
• 4-of-4 free throws
• 11 rebounds
• 2 steals
• 1 block
• Plus-12

The most striking number is his rebounding total relative to his playing time.

Collins averaged 0.55 rebounds per minute during his 20 minutes on the floor. More importantly, he helped Los Angeles control the overall rebounding battle.

The Clippers finished with 47 rebounds compared with 35 for Utah.

That 12-rebound advantage is substantial.

It gave Los Angeles additional possessions and reduced the number of second-chance opportunities available to Utah.

Collins also finished with a plus-12 plus/minus, meaning Los Angeles outscored Utah by 12 points during his minutes.

Plus/minus should never be treated as a complete measure of individual performance, but in this case it complements his 11 rebounds and defensive activity.

Nicolas Batum Provided Efficient Three-Point Shooting

Nicolas Batum was one of the most efficient Clippers shooters in the game.

He recorded:

• 14 points
• 4-of-6 field goals
• 4-of-6 from three
• 2-of-2 free throws
• 2 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 1 steal
• Plus-11

Batum made four three-pointers while attempting only six.

That means he converted 66.7 percent from beyond the arc.

His shooting was especially valuable because Leonard and Harden attracted defensive attention. Efficient supporting players can punish defensive schemes that focus too heavily on primary creators.

Batum’s four three-pointers accounted for 12 points.

That is an excellent return from only six attempts.

Derrick Jones Jr. Added Two-Way Production

Derrick Jones Jr. scored 10 points and contributed across several categories.

His line included:

• 10 points
• 4-of-7 field goals
• 2-of-3 three-pointers
• 6 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 2 turnovers
• 1 block
• Plus-11

His 2-of-3 shooting from three was another example of efficient perimeter production.

Jones also collected six rebounds and blocked a shot, showing that his contribution was not limited to scoring.

His plus-11 rating was tied to a strong all-around performance.

The Clippers Bench and Supporting Cast

Los Angeles received useful contributions beyond its biggest names.

Kobe Sanders scored 10 points on 4-of-7 shooting and made two of his five three-point attempts. He also recorded four rebounds and three assists.

Yanic Konan Niederhauser had six points and 10 rebounds in 27 minutes. His rebounding total was particularly useful for a Clippers team that finished 12 boards ahead of Utah.

Kris Dunn scored only two points, but he contributed two assists, two rebounds, and one steal in 24 minutes.

Kobe Brown and Jordan Miller each played only one minute, so their statistical impact was naturally limited.

Cam Christie also played one minute without recording a statistical contribution.

Brook Lopez had a difficult shooting night. He scored three points on 1-of-12 shooting and went 1-of-12 from three-point range.

That was easily one of the least efficient individual shooting performances in the game.

Despite that, Lopez recorded one steal and one block and finished with a plus-2.

Utah Jazz Offensive Leaders

Utah’s offensive production was distributed among several players.

Kyle Anderson led the Jazz with 22 points according to his full statistical line, while Brice Sensabaugh finished with 20 and Cody Williams scored 18.

Isaiah Collier added 16 points and produced the team’s best playmaking performance with 10 assists.

These numbers show that Utah did have enough individual scoring to remain competitive for portions of the game.

The problem was efficiency and possession control.

Kyle Anderson

Anderson produced perhaps Utah’s most efficient offensive performance.

He recorded:

• 22 points
• 8-of-10 field goals
• 0-of-0 three-pointers
• 6-of-7 free throws
• 8 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 2 turnovers
• 2 steals
• 2 blocks
• Plus-7

He shot 80 percent from the field.

That was excellent.

He also contributed eight rebounds, two steals, and two blocks.

His plus-7 was the best plus/minus among the listed Utah players.

Anderson’s performance demonstrates that Utah had individual players capable of highly efficient production even though the team lost by 17.

Brice Sensabaugh

Sensabaugh scored 20 points in 32 minutes.

His line included:

• 20 points
• 7-of-15 field goals
• 0-of-5 three-pointers
• 6-of-8 free throws
• 3 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 5 turnovers
• 2 steals
• Minus-14

The five turnovers are important.

Sensabaugh’s 20 points were valuable, but losing five possessions through turnovers reduced the overall impact of that scoring.

His inability to make a three-pointer also limited his perimeter efficiency.

He still shot 46.7 percent from the field, but the five missed three-point attempts show that his scoring profile was not as efficient as the raw 20-point total might suggest.

Isaiah Collier

Collier was one of the most important Utah players because of his passing.

He finished with:

• 16 points
• 6-of-9 field goals
• 1-of-3 three-pointers
• 3-of-5 free throws
• 6 rebounds
• 10 assists
• 5 turnovers
• 1 block
• Minus-15

The 10 assists were the highest total for either team.

However, the five turnovers also mattered.

Collier’s performance therefore represents both sides of point guard production. He created opportunities for teammates but also gave Los Angeles extra possessions.

His 10 assists demonstrate his playmaking value, while the five turnovers show where Utah could have improved its possession management.

Cody Williams Provides Another Scoring Option

Cody Williams finished with 18 points.

He shot:

• 6-of-10 from the field
• 2-of-5 from three
• 4-of-5 at the free throw line

He also recorded one block.

Williams’ 60 percent field goal shooting made him one of Utah’s more efficient scorers.

However, he finished with a minus-10 plus/minus.

Again, this shows why individual shooting percentages need context. A player can shoot well and still be part of a lineup that loses its minutes.

Utah’s Supporting Players

Kyle Filipowski had a difficult night.

He finished with four points on 2-of-13 shooting and missed all five of his three-point attempts. He also recorded six rebounds, one assist, one block, and four turnovers.

His minus-18 was the lowest listed plus/minus in the game.

Taylor Hendricks was much more efficient, making both of his field goal attempts and his only three-point attempt. He scored five points in 17 minutes.

Svi Mykhailiuk scored five points on 2-of-9 shooting.

Oscar Tshiebwe contributed six rebounds in 15 minutes but scored only two points.

Walter Clayton Jr. scored nine points, added three assists and two rebounds, and made all four of his free throws.

Kevin Love did not play because of rest.

Jusuf Nurkic did not play because of a sprained left toe.

Ace Bailey was also unavailable because of a strained left hip flexor.

Those absences are part of the game context and should be considered when evaluating Utah’s available rotation.

Team Shooting Comparison

The overall shooting numbers provide one of the clearest explanations for the result.

Statistic	Utah Jazz	LA Clippers
Field Goals	36-78	40-89
Field Goal %	46%	45%
Three-Pointers	6-27	16-51
Three-Point %	22%	31%
Free Throws	23-30	22-26
Free Throw %	77%	85%

At first glance, Utah’s 46 percent field goal percentage was slightly higher than Los Angeles’ 45 percent.

That might seem surprising given the 17-point defeat.

The explanation is three-point volume and efficiency.

Los Angeles made 16 three-pointers.

Utah made six.

That is a difference of 10 made threes.

Those 10 additional made three-pointers represent 30 extra points from beyond the arc.

Utah shot only 22 percent from three, while Los Angeles shot 31 percent.

Therefore, field goal percentage alone significantly understates the Clippers’ shooting advantage.

The Three-Point Battle Changed the Game

The Clippers attempted 51 three-pointers.

Utah attempted 27.

That is a difference of 24 attempts.

Los Angeles made 16 of those attempts, while Utah made six.

This created a 30-point advantage in made three-point scoring.

Even though Los Angeles made fewer total field goals by only four, the distribution of those baskets was dramatically different.

This is why modern basketball analysis often separates traditional field goal percentage from three-point efficiency.

The Clippers were able to generate more high-value perimeter scoring.

Batum, Leonard, Jones Jr., and Sanders all contributed made three-pointers.

Utah struggled to find the same consistency.

Rebounding Was Another Major Difference

The Clippers won the rebounding battle 47-35.

That is a 12-rebound advantage.

John Collins led Los Angeles with 11 rebounds, while Niederhauser collected 10. Derrick Jones Jr. added six.

For Utah, Kyle Anderson and Isaiah Collier each recorded six rebounds. Kyle Filipowski also had six, while Oscar Tshiebwe had six.

The unusual feature is that Utah’s rebounds were distributed fairly well, but Los Angeles still produced the larger team total.

A 12-rebound difference can influence both ends of the floor.

Offensively, it can create second chances.

Defensively, it can end possessions more effectively.

That becomes even more important when a team is struggling to shoot from three-point range.

Turnovers Hurt Utah

Utah committed 18 turnovers.

Los Angeles committed 12.

That created a six-turnover difference.

The individual numbers highlight where some of those turnovers came from.

Sensabaugh committed five.

Collier committed five.

Filipowski committed four.

Together, those three players accounted for 14 turnovers.

That is a significant amount of possession loss.

The Clippers were not perfect either, but their 12 turnovers were considerably more manageable.

Harden’s one turnover in particular stands out because he also recorded seven assists.

Free Throw Shooting

Both teams were reasonably effective at the free throw line.

Utah made 23 of 30 attempts for 77 percent.

Los Angeles made 22 of 26 for 85 percent.

The Clippers therefore made four fewer free throws but shot eight percentage points better.

Harden was 9-of-11.

Leonard was 7-of-9.

John Collins was 4-of-4.

For Utah, Sensabaugh went 6-of-8, Anderson went 6-of-7, and Cody Williams went 4-of-5.

These numbers show that both teams were capable of converting at the line.

The larger difference came from field goal distribution, three-point shooting, rebounding, and turnovers.

Assists and Ball Movement

Both teams finished with 20 assists.

That is an interesting statistic because the final score was not close.

Utah’s 20 assists included 10 from Collier.

Los Angeles’ 20 assists included seven from Harden.

The equal assist total indicates that the Clippers did not simply win because they passed the ball dramatically better.

Instead, the decisive difference was what happened after those offensive actions.

Los Angeles converted more perimeter shots and controlled the boards.

Utah created opportunities but did not finish enough of them efficiently.

Defensive Statistics

Los Angeles recorded:

• 8 steals
• 7 blocks
• 47 rebounds

Utah recorded:

• 7 steals
• 5 blocks
• 35 rebounds

The Clippers therefore had advantages in all three categories.

Leonard contributed two steals and two blocks.

Collins recorded two steals and one block.

Niederhauser added two blocks.

Utah received strong defensive activity from Anderson, who had two steals and two blocks.

These numbers show that the Clippers’ victory was not purely an offensive performance.

They also did a better job finishing defensive possessions.

Why the First Quarter Mattered So Much

The first quarter finished 31-17 in favor of Los Angeles.

That 14-point advantage was the largest early separation of the game.

Utah responded strongly in the second quarter, scoring 33 points while limiting Los Angeles to 22.

At halftime, the game had become much more competitive.

But the Clippers did not allow the second-quarter setback to determine the rest of the game.

They scored 29 in the third and 36 in the fourth.

Utah scored 31 and 20.

The fourth quarter was therefore decisive.

Los Angeles’ 36-point closing period effectively removed any realistic path for Utah to complete the comeback.

The Fourth Quarter Tells the Story

The fourth quarter deserves special attention when reviewing the la clippers vs utah jazz match player stats.

Los Angeles scored 36 points.

Utah scored 20.

That 16-point difference was almost identical to the entire final margin.

The Clippers were therefore able to finish the game much more strongly than Utah.

This is often where individual star power becomes particularly valuable.

Leonard’s ability to create his own shot gave Los Angeles a reliable offensive option when possessions became more important.

Harden provided another creator.

Supporting shooters such as Batum and Jones Jr. also made it harder for Utah to overload the defense.

What the Plus/Minus Numbers Reveal

Plus/minus can be misleading when used alone, but the game provides several interesting examples.

For Los Angeles:

• Niederhauser: +18
• Collins: +12
• Batum: +11
• Jones Jr.: +11
• Sanders: +13
• Leonard: +8
• Harden: +5

For Utah:

• Anderson: +7
• Sensabaugh: -14
• Collier: -15
• Filipowski: -18
• Williams: -10

Niederhauser’s +18 was the highest listed figure in the game.

He scored only six points, which demonstrates that his impact came through more than scoring. His 10 rebounds and two blocks were significant contributors.

Leonard’s +8 also demonstrates an important point. His individual 45-point explosion was the primary offensive headline, but several supporting players had even higher plus/minus numbers.

That is why complete box score analysis should combine scoring, efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, and lineup impact.

Comparing the Most Important Individual Performances

The la clippers vs utah jazz match player stats can be divided into several categories.

Best Scoring Performance

Kawhi Leonard, 45 points

There is no question about the top scoring performance.

Leonard scored more than twice as many points as any Utah player.

Best Playmaking Performance

Isaiah Collier, 10 assists

Collier led all players in assists.

His five turnovers, however, prevented the passing performance from being completely clean.

Best Rebounding Performance

John Collins, 11 rebounds

Collins grabbed 11 rebounds in just 20 minutes.

Niederhauser’s 10 rebounds were nearly as impressive.

Most Efficient Utah Scorer

Kyle Anderson

Anderson made 8 of 10 field goals and finished with 22 points.

Best Three-Point Efficiency

Nicolas Batum

Batum made 4 of 6 from three.

That 66.7 percent rate was a major offensive boost.

Most Productive Two-Way Line

Kyle Anderson

His 22 points, 8 rebounds, 2 steals, and 2 blocks gave Utah production across several categories.

What Utah Could Have Done Differently

The box score suggests several practical areas for improvement.

1. Reduce Turnovers

Utah’s 18 turnovers were too costly.

Collier and Sensabaugh each committed five, while Filipowski added four.

Reducing unnecessary turnovers would have produced more possessions and potentially reduced Los Angeles’ offensive opportunities.

2. Improve Three-Point Shot Selection and Execution

Six made threes from 27 attempts is a major limitation.

Utah shot only 22 percent from beyond the arc.

The team did not necessarily need to attempt the same 51 threes as Los Angeles, but it needed greater efficiency from its perimeter opportunities.

3. Finish Defensive Possessions

The 47-35 rebounding disadvantage indicates that Utah did not consistently finish possessions with defensive rebounds.

Against a team featuring strong rebounders such as Collins and Niederhauser, that can create repeated scoring opportunities.

4. Contain Primary Scoring Options

Leonard scored 45.

That is the central defensive problem.

Holding a star scorer to a more manageable total would have dramatically changed the offensive pressure on the rest of the Clippers’ roster.

What the Clippers Did Well

Los Angeles’ statistical profile shows several strengths.

Perimeter Production

The Clippers made 16 three-pointers.

That was the clearest shooting advantage.

Rebounding

A 47-35 rebounding advantage helped control possession.

Turnover Management

The Clippers committed six fewer turnovers.

Star Scoring

Leonard provided 45 points.

Secondary Creation

Harden produced seven assists and 20 points.

Efficient Role Players

Batum, Jones Jr., and Sanders all contributed efficient shooting performances.

This balance made it difficult for Utah to solve one problem without creating another.

How to Read These Statistics Correctly

A common mistake when reviewing a box score is focusing only on the highest scoring player.

For this game, that would mean seeing Leonard’s 45 points and stopping there.

A better approach is to work through five questions:

1. Who scored efficiently?
2. Who controlled possessions?
3. Who created shots for teammates?
4. Which team won the rebounding and turnover battles?
5. Which players influenced the game beyond scoring?

That approach produces a much more complete understanding of the matchup.

For example, Leonard’s 45 points explain a large part of Los Angeles’ offense, but Collins’ 11 rebounds, Harden’s seven assists, Batum’s four made threes, and Niederhauser’s 10 rebounds explain why the Clippers were able to maintain control.

Advanced Takeaways From the Box Score

Several deeper observations emerge from the numbers.

Los Angeles Won Despite Similar Field Goal Percentages

Utah shot 46 percent.

Los Angeles shot 45 percent.

Yet Los Angeles won by 17.

This proves that overall field goal percentage is not enough to explain a basketball game.

Three-point production and possession volume mattered more.

Utah’s Best Shooters Were Not Its Highest Scorers

Anderson shot 80 percent.

Williams shot 60 percent.

Sensabaugh scored 20 but went 0-of-5 from three.

This suggests Utah had efficient individual options but did not consistently combine those performances into team-level efficiency.

Harden’s Turnover Control Was Excellent

Seven assists with one turnover is an outstanding ratio.

That helped offset his 5-of-14 field goal shooting.

Collins Was Highly Productive Per Minute

Eleven rebounds in 20 minutes is a notable contribution.

His scoring was modest, but his rebounding and defensive activity were valuable.

Utah’s Turnover Distribution Was Concerning

Collier, Sensabaugh, and Filipowski combined for 14 turnovers.

That is an area that stands out immediately when examining the box score.

Real-World Value of Player Statistics

Player statistics are useful beyond simply identifying who scored the most points.

• For fans, they help explain why a game was won or lost.
• For analysts, they reveal efficiency and possession patterns.
• For coaches, they can highlight lineup strengths and weaknesses.
• For fantasy basketball players, they provide information about players who contribute across several categories.
• For sports writers, detailed box score analysis can turn a basic game recap into a meaningful explanation of what actually happened.

The most useful statistical analysis does not simply repeat the numbers. It connects them.

In this matchup, the connections are clear.

Leonard’s scoring combined with Los Angeles’ three-point shooting created offensive pressure.

Collins and Niederhauser helped produce a 47-35 rebounding advantage.

Harden created seven assists while committing only one turnover.

Utah had good individual performances from Anderson, Sensabaugh, Williams, and Collier, but 18 team turnovers and 22 percent three-point shooting limited the overall result.

A Reliable Framework for Future Matchup Analysis

When analyzing another NBA matchup, use the following framework.

Step 1: Start With the Score

The final score establishes the outcome but does not explain it.

Step 2: Examine Quarter Trends

Look for large scoring swings.

In this game, the first and fourth quarters were decisive.

Step 3: Compare Shooting

Separate overall field goal percentage from three-point and free throw performance.

Step 4: Check Rebounds

A major rebounding difference can indicate extra possessions and second-chance opportunities.

Step 5: Check Turnovers

Turnovers are lost possessions.

They can be particularly damaging when a team is already struggling to shoot.

Step 6: Identify Individual Efficiency

Look beyond scoring totals.

A 20-point performance on efficient shooting can be more productive than a 25-point performance requiring many attempts.

Step 7: Consider Playmaking

Assists and turnovers together provide more context than assists alone.

Step 8: Consider Defensive Contributions

Steals, blocks, rebounds, and plus/minus can help identify players who influenced the game beyond scoring.

Player Statistics at a Glance

LA Clippers

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	+/-
Kawhi Leonard	39	45	7	3	16-29	6-16	+8
James Harden	29	20	3	7	5-14	1-6	+5
Nicolas Batum	28	14	2	1	4-6	4-6	+11
Derrick Jones Jr.	24	10	6	1	4-7	2-3	+11
Kobe Sanders	24	10	4	3	4-7	2-5	+13
John Collins	20	8	11	0	2-3	0-1	+12
Yanic Konan Niederhauser	27	6	10	1	3-7	0-0	+18
Brook Lopez	20	3	2	1	1-12	1-12	+2
Kris Dunn	24	2	2	2	1-4	0-2	-4

Utah Jazz

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	+/-
Kyle Anderson	32	22	8	1	8-10	0-0	+7
Brice Sensabaugh	32	20	3	3	7-15	0-5	-14
Cody Williams	26	18	0	0	6-10	2-5	-10
Isaiah Collier	37	16	6	10	6-9	1-3	-15
Walter Clayton Jr.	30	9	2	3	2-6	1-3	-9
Taylor Hendricks	17	5	2	0	2-2	1-1	-10
Svi Mykhailiuk	24	5	2	1	2-9	1-5	-13
Kyle Filipowski	28	4	6	1	2-13	0-5	-18
Oscar Tshiebwe	15	2	6	1	1-4	0-0	-3

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the LA Clippers vs Utah Jazz game?

Kawhi Leonard led all scorers with 45 points for the LA Clippers. He shot 16-of-29 from the field, made six three-pointers, and converted seven free throws.

What was the final score between the Clippers and Jazz?

The LA Clippers defeated the Utah Jazz 118-101 on January 2, 2026, at Intuit Dome.

Who led the Utah Jazz in scoring?

Kyle Anderson scored 22 points for Utah, while Brice Sensabaugh scored 20 and Cody Williams added 18.

Who had the most assists in the game?

Isaiah Collier led all players with 10 assists. James Harden led the Clippers with seven assists.

Who led the game in rebounds?

John Collins led all players with 11 rebounds for Los Angeles. Yanic Konan Niederhauser was close behind with 10 rebounds.

Why did the Clippers beat the Jazz?

The Clippers benefited from several statistical advantages, including a 16-6 edge in made three-pointers, a 47-35 rebounding advantage, and 12 turnovers compared with Utah’s 18. Kawhi Leonard’s 45 points also provided a major scoring advantage.

Conclusion

The la clippers vs utah jazz match player stats provide a clear explanation for Los Angeles’ 118-101 victory.

Kawhi Leonard was the headline performer with 45 points, seven rebounds, three assists, two steals, and two blocks. James Harden added 20 points and seven assists while committing only one turnover. John Collins controlled the glass with 11 rebounds, and several Clippers role players delivered efficient perimeter shooting.

Utah had its own strong performances. Kyle Anderson scored 22 points on 8-of-10 shooting, Brice Sensabaugh produced 20 points, Cody Williams added 18, and Isaiah Collier delivered 10 assists. But those individual efforts were not enough to overcome Utah’s 18 turnovers, 22 percent three-point shooting, and 12-rebound deficit.

The biggest statistical difference was the three-point line. Los Angeles made 16 threes compared with Utah’s six. That 30-point difference in made three-point scoring was a major reason the Clippers could overcome Utah’s stretches of strong offensive play.

The quarter-by-quarter numbers also matter. Utah won the second quarter 33-22 and the third quarter 31-29, but Los Angeles created a large early lead and then finished the game with a 36-20 fourth quarter.

Taken together, the statistics show a game in which star scoring, perimeter efficiency, rebounding, and turnover control worked together to produce the final result.