Cleveland guardians vs Seattle mariners match player stats
The cleveland guardians vs seattle mariners match player stats from June 28, 2026 tell the story of a game that changed dramatically in one inning. The Seattle Mariners built a 4-1 lead and appeared to be in control at Progressive Field, but the Cleveland Guardians exploded for five runs in the eighth inning and completed a 6-5 comeback. Cleveland finished with 12 hits, Seattle had 13, and both teams left important scoring opportunities unused throughout the afternoon. MLB’s official game record confirms the 6-5 final score, the five-run eighth inning, and the individual performances that shaped the result.
For readers looking beyond the final score, this matchup is particularly interesting because the traditional numbers do not immediately explain the outcome. Seattle collected more hits than Cleveland, 13 to 12. The Mariners also held a lead for most of the game. Yet Cleveland converted its most important opportunities at the right time, particularly in the eighth inning when Chase DeLauter and Rhys Hoskins delivered consecutive high-leverage run-producing hits.
This breakdown examines the complete batting and pitching picture, explains which individual performances mattered most, looks at the decisive eighth inning, and puts the numbers into proper baseball context.
Game overview
The game was played on June 28, 2026, at Progressive Field in Cleveland, Ohio. The Guardians entered the afternoon with a 44-40 record, while the Mariners were 42-43.
Cleveland ultimately won 6-5 and completed a 2-1 series victory over Seattle.
Final score
| Team | R | H | E |
| Seattle Mariners | 5 | 13 | 1 |
| Cleveland Guardians | 6 | 12 | 2 |
The scoring pattern was unusual for a comeback of this type.
Seattle scored in the second, third, sixth and ninth innings. Cleveland scored once in the fifth and then produced five runs in the eighth.
| Inning | Mariners | Guardians |
| 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 | 2 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
| Final | 5 | 6 |
The most important point is simple: Cleveland did not win by dominating the game from start to finish. It won by turning one late offensive opportunity into a five-run inning.
cleveland guardians vs seattle mariners match player stats at a glance
The overall team numbers show just how close the game was.
Seattle recorded 13 hits in 41 at-bats, while Cleveland had 12 hits in 34 at-bats. The Mariners scored five runs and produced three RBIs. Cleveland scored six runs and produced six RBIs.
Seattle went 2-for-14 with runners in scoring position. Cleveland went 4-for-13.
That difference is significant because it shows that Cleveland converted a higher percentage of its important scoring chances.
The Mariners also left 14 runners on base, compared with 12 for the Guardians.
Neither team hit a home run.
Team batting comparison
| Category | Mariners | Guardians |
| At-bats | 41 | 34 |
| Runs | 5 | 6 |
| Hits | 13 | 12 |
| RBIs | 3 | 6 |
| Home runs | 0 | 0 |
| Walks | 4 | 6 |
| Strikeouts | 9 | 7 |
| RISP | 2-for-14 | 4-for-13 |
| Left on base | 14 | 12 |
| Stolen bases | 2 | 2 |
The contrast between hits and runs is one of the clearest lessons from the game.
Seattle had the higher hit total, but Cleveland’s hits were more damaging when runners were in scoring position. The Guardians also drew two more walks and struck out two fewer times.
That combination helped Cleveland create enough traffic to make the eighth-inning comeback possible.
Seattle Mariners batting performance
The Mariners produced several productive individual performances, even though the team could not protect its lead.
J.P. Crawford, Julio Rodríguez, Josh Naylor, Cole Young and Victor Robles each recorded two hits.
Rodríguez finished 2-for-4 with one run and one RBI. Naylor went 2-for-4 with one run and one RBI. Young also collected two hits and scored once.
Victor Robles went 2-for-5 and scored a run. He also stole three bases, giving Seattle an important source of pressure on the bases.
Crawford was 2-for-6 and reached base multiple times through his hits, although Seattle was unable to turn enough of those opportunities into runs.
J.P. Crawford
Crawford finished with two hits in six at-bats.
His performance is important when looking at the game as a whole because Seattle consistently generated baserunners. The problem was not simply an inability to make contact.
Seattle’s biggest offensive issue was converting opportunities.
The Mariners went only 2-for-14 with runners in scoring position and left 14 runners on base. That means the hit total did not translate efficiently into scoring.
Julio Rodríguez
Rodríguez had one of Seattle’s most complete offensive games.
He went 2-for-4 with one run, one RBI, one walk and two strikeouts. He also stole a base.
His RBI came in the sixth inning, extending Seattle’s advantage to 4-1.
The two hits gave Rodríguez a meaningful role in creating and extending the Mariners’ lead. His individual numbers were productive, but the team needed more successful at-bats behind him to turn that production into a larger margin.
Baseball Savant’s game-level data also records Rodríguez’s two-hit performance on June 28.
Josh Naylor
Naylor went 2-for-4 with one run and one RBI.
His third-inning double was especially important because it helped Seattle move from a 1-0 lead to a 2-0 advantage. Naylor later scored on a defensive error, giving the Mariners a 3-0 lead.
The double was his 11th of the season according to the game record.
Cole Young
Young finished 2-for-5 and scored one run.
However, his afternoon also included Seattle’s only defensive error. His fielding error contributed to Cleveland’s opportunities, although it did not directly determine the final result by itself.
Young’s performance illustrates why baseball evaluation should separate offensive and defensive contributions. His two hits helped Seattle offensively, while the fielding error added another variable to a game that was eventually decided by a very small margin.
Victor Robles
Robles went 2-for-5 and scored one run.
His baserunning was one of Seattle’s strongest features. He stole three bases, while Rodríguez stole another.
Robles was also involved in the final Mariners run. He reached on a throwing error by Cleveland second baseman Travis Bazzana, allowing Cole Young to score and cutting Cleveland’s lead to 6-5 in the ninth inning.
That sequence made the final moments considerably more tense.
Seattle’s pitching performance
Emerson Hancock started for Seattle and delivered a strong performance for most of his outing.
Hancock worked 5.2 innings, allowing five hits and one earned run. He walked three and struck out six. He threw 97 pitches.
His performance was especially notable because Cleveland’s offense did not generate much against him. Hancock exited with Seattle holding a 3-1 lead.
The Mariners’ pitching staff then used Eduard Bazardo, Gabe Speier, Michael Rucker and Josh Simpson.
The bullpen initially maintained Seattle’s advantage. The major problem came in the eighth.
Emerson Hancock’s role
Hancock’s final line:
| Statistic | Hancock |
| Innings | 5.2 |
| Hits | 5 |
| Runs | 1 |
| Earned runs | 1 |
| Walks | 3 |
| Strikeouts | 6 |
| Home runs | 0 |
| Pitches | 97 |
This was the type of starting-pitching performance that normally gives a team a strong opportunity to win.
Hancock limited damage, avoided the long ball and struck out six. The Guardians scored only one run during his appearance.
The later bullpen collapse therefore changed the meaning of an otherwise effective start.
Cleveland Guardians batting performance
Cleveland’s offense looked quiet for the first seven innings.
The Guardians had only one run through seven innings and were facing a four-run deficit entering the bottom of the eighth.
Then the lineup changed the game.
Chase DeLauter finished 2-for-5 with two RBIs and one run. Rhys Hoskins went 2-for-2 with two RBIs and a double. Kahlil Watson also had two hits, while Daniel Schneemann collected two hits and one RBI.
Gabriel Arias and Brayan Rocchio each recorded a hit as well.
The Guardians did not rely on a home run. Instead, they built the comeback through singles, walks, baserunning and timely extra-base hitting.
Chase DeLauter
DeLauter’s performance was one of the defining stories of the game.
He went 2-for-5 with two RBIs and scored once in his return to Cleveland’s lineup after being activated from the injured list.
MLB reported that DeLauter delivered a game-tying two-run single in the eighth inning, scoring Cleveland’s second and third runs of the inning and bringing the Guardians level at 4-4.
That was more than a routine hit.
Cleveland had trailed 4-1. DeLauter came to the plate with the bases loaded and two outs. He lined a two-run single up the middle, immediately transforming the inning.
His baserunning then became important again.
DeLauter scored from first base on Hoskins’ double, helping Cleveland take the lead.
The combination of hitting and aggressive baserunning made his contribution larger than the basic 2-for-5 line suggests.
Rhys Hoskins
Hoskins produced the game’s biggest extra-base hit.
He went 2-for-2 with two RBIs and hit his 13th double of the season.
His eighth-inning double brought home DeLauter and Steven Kwan, pushing Cleveland from a 4-4 tie to a 6-4 lead.
That swing completed the five-run rally.
Hoskins did not need a home run to change the game. A well-timed double with runners on base was enough.
His performance is a strong example of why batting average or total hits alone cannot explain a close baseball game. Hoskins had only two official at-bats, but both resulted in hits, and both were important to Cleveland’s comeback.
Kahlil Watson
Watson went 2-for-3.
His two hits helped Cleveland maintain offensive pressure, and he also stole a base.
Watson was one of several Cleveland hitters who helped create the traffic needed for the eighth-inning rally.
Daniel Schneemann
Schneemann went 2-for-2 with one RBI and a double.
His RBI single in the eighth inning reduced Seattle’s lead from 4-1 to 4-2.
That at-bat mattered because it started the sequence that eventually became a five-run inning.
His double was his 10th of the season.
Travis Bazzana
Bazzana went 0-for-3 but still contributed an RBI through a sacrifice fly.
His fifth-inning sacrifice fly scored Steven Kwan and put Cleveland on the board.
Bazzana also committed a throwing error in the ninth inning that allowed Seattle to score its final run.
This was therefore a mixed game statistically. His sacrifice fly contributed directly to Cleveland’s scoring, while his late defensive error gave Seattle one final opening.
Cleveland’s pitching performance
Gavin Williams started for Cleveland.
He worked five innings and allowed six hits, three runs and two earned runs. He walked three and struck out six.
Williams’ outing was not dominant, but the distinction between runs allowed and earned runs is important. Seattle scored three runs while he was on the mound, but only two were charged as earned.
Gavin Williams’ pitching line
| Statistic | Williams |
| Innings | 5.0 |
| Hits | 6 |
| Runs | 3 |
| Earned runs | 2 |
| Walks | 3 |
| Strikeouts | 6 |
| Home runs | 0 |
| Pitches | 103 |
Williams left with Cleveland trailing, but the Guardians’ bullpen eventually stabilized the game.
Shawn Armstrong allowed one earned run in 0.2 innings while striking out two. Tim Herrin then supplied a scoreless inning.
Matt Festa became the winning pitcher after working 1.1 scoreless innings with one walk.
Cade Smith closed the game with one inning, allowing two hits and one unearned run while striking out one. He earned his 26th save.
The final Cleveland pitching line was nine innings, 13 hits, five runs, three earned runs, four walks and nine strikeouts.
The decisive eighth inning
The eighth inning is the central reason this game deserves deeper analysis.
Cleveland entered the inning trailing 4-1.
At that point, Seattle had controlled the game for several innings. The Mariners had received quality work from Hancock and had added runs through the second, third and sixth innings.
Cleveland then began its comeback.
Daniel Schneemann produced an RBI single to make it 4-2.
The Guardians continued to put pressure on the Mariners’ pitching staff.
With the bases loaded and two outs, DeLauter delivered the key game-tying hit.
His two-run single made it 4-4.
Then Hoskins stepped in and hit a two-run double.
The Guardians suddenly led 6-4.
MLB’s official game story confirms the sequence: Schneemann cut the deficit, DeLauter tied the game with a two-run single, and Hoskins followed with the go-ahead two-run double.
Why the inning mattered so much
The inning was not simply about four or five hits.
It combined several elements:
- Cleveland created baserunners.
- Seattle failed to finish the inning with two outs.
- DeLauter delivered with the bases loaded.
- Hoskins converted the next major opportunity.
- Cleveland used aggressive baserunning to gain an extra scoring opportunity.
- Seattle’s bullpen could not preserve the lead.
This is why the five-run inning should be viewed as a sequence rather than one isolated play.
Mariners bullpen vs. Guardians bullpen
The bullpen comparison helps explain the final result.
Seattle’s relievers allowed five runs across 2.1 innings after Hancock departed.
Michael Rucker was charged with four earned runs in just 0.1 innings. Josh Simpson allowed one earned run in 0.2 innings and was charged with a blown save.
By comparison, Cleveland’s bullpen allowed two runs over four innings, with only one of those runs earned.
Bullpen comparison
| Pitching staff | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K |
| Mariners bullpen | 2.1 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Guardians bullpen | 4.0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
This is one of the clearest statistical differences in the game.
Seattle’s bullpen did not merely surrender the lead. It allowed Cleveland to turn a 4-1 deficit into a 6-4 advantage in one inning.
Cleveland’s relief group, despite giving up hits, prevented another large inning and held Seattle close enough to preserve the comeback.
RISP tells the story
One of the most useful numbers in the game is runners in scoring position.
Seattle:
2-for-14
Cleveland:
4-for-13
Neither team was overwhelmingly efficient, but Cleveland converted twice as many RISP opportunities despite having one fewer opportunity.
That efficiency translated directly into the final score.
Seattle’s 13 hits show that the Mariners were capable of reaching base and making contact. The problem was that many of those hits did not become runs.
Cleveland’s 12 hits produced six runs.
This is a reminder that hit totals should never be read in isolation when analyzing a single baseball game.
Extra-base hits and run creation
Seattle recorded only one double, with Naylor producing his 11th of the season.
Cleveland recorded two doubles.
Hoskins hit his 13th double, while Schneemann hit his 10th.
The Guardians’ two extra-base hits came from players who directly influenced the comeback.
Schneemann’s double added to his overall offensive contribution, while Hoskins’ double supplied the decisive runs.
No home runs were hit by either team.
That makes the game a useful example of run creation without the long ball.
Cleveland generated its winning margin through sequencing. The team did not need a three-run homer or a series of spectacular power swings.
Defensive errors and their impact
Both teams committed defensive errors.
Seattle had one error, charged to Cole Young.
Cleveland had two errors, one by Brayan Rocchio and another by Travis Bazzana.
The errors did not completely determine the result, but they affected the scoring environment.
Seattle’s third run came after Naylor’s double and a defensive error that allowed him to score.
Cleveland’s second error came in the ninth inning.
Bazzana’s throwing error allowed Cole Young to score, reducing Cleveland’s advantage from 6-4 to 6-5.
That play gave Seattle a final opportunity.
Cade Smith then retired J.P. Crawford on a groundout to finish the game.
The late defensive mistake therefore mattered because it created a one-run game with the Mariners at the plate in the ninth.
Baserunning was another hidden factor
The game also featured meaningful baserunning.
Seattle stole three bases through Victor Robles and one through Julio Rodríguez.
Cleveland stole bases through Kahlil Watson and Brayan Rocchio.
The most important baserunning moment, however, came without a stolen base.
DeLauter scored from first on Hoskins’ double during the eighth-inning rally.
MLB reported that DeLauter had to navigate an unusual situation involving the bat near home plate and a collision with catcher Mitch Garver, but he was able to score.
That run helped transform a 4-4 tie into a 5-4 Cleveland lead before Hoskins’ RBI was fully reflected in the scoring sequence.
It shows why baserunning cannot be reduced to stolen-base totals.
Taking an extra base at the right moment can be just as important.
Starting pitching comparison
The two starting pitchers produced relatively similar strikeout totals but different game situations.
Hancock:
- 5.2 innings
- 5 hits
- 1 run
- 1 earned run
- 3 walks
- 6 strikeouts
Williams:
- 5 innings
- 6 hits
- 3 runs
- 2 earned runs
- 3 walks
- 6 strikeouts
Hancock’s line was statistically cleaner.
However, starting-pitcher quality alone did not decide the game.
Hancock left with Seattle ahead, while Williams departed with Cleveland behind.
The decisive difference came later.
What the box score says about the game
The numbers point to several conclusions.
1. Seattle made enough contact to win
Thirteen hits is a strong offensive total in a nine-inning game.
Seattle had five players with at least two hits.
That means the Mariners were not shut down.
2. Cleveland was more efficient
The Guardians scored six runs on 12 hits.
Seattle scored five runs on 13 hits.
The Guardians also drew six walks compared with four for Seattle.
That gave Cleveland more opportunities to create productive plate appearances.
3. The eighth inning outweighed seven innings of control
Seattle led 4-1 after the top of the sixth and remained ahead through seven innings.
One five-run inning changed everything.
This is an important lesson when interpreting live baseball statistics. A team can dominate the scoreboard for most of a game and still lose if it cannot finish.
4. The bullpen changed the game
Hancock’s strong start gave Seattle a favorable position.
The relief staff could not protect it.
Rucker’s four earned runs in 0.1 innings were especially costly.
5. Cleveland’s lineup produced in the highest-pressure moments
DeLauter and Hoskins combined for four RBIs.
Schneemann added another RBI.
Those three hitters were directly involved in five of Cleveland’s six runs.
Player-by-player statistical snapshot
Seattle Mariners
| Player | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K |
| J.P. Crawford | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Julio Rodríguez | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Josh Naylor | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Randy Arozarena | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Cal Raleigh | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Cole Young | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Colt Emerson | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mitch Garver | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Victor Robles | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Seattle’s offensive profile was balanced around several multi-hit players, but the lack of RISP success prevented those hits from producing a larger scoring total.
Cleveland Guardians
| Player | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K |
| Steven Kwan | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Travis Bazzana | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Chase DeLauter | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Kyle Manzardo | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Rhys Hoskins | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Kahlil Watson | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Brayan Rocchio | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Cooper Ingle | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gabriel Arias | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Schneemann | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Austin Hedges | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The Cleveland batting line shows an important feature of the comeback: several hitters contributed even without producing large individual counting-stat totals.
The most important statistical takeaways
For anyone studying this matchup, the following numbers deserve the most attention:
13 to 12 in hits: Seattle had more hits, but that did not lead to victory.
4-for-13 with RISP: Cleveland’s success with runners in scoring position helped turn its opportunities into runs.
2-for-14 with RISP: Seattle repeatedly reached base but failed to finish enough scoring chances.
14 runners left on base: The Mariners had many opportunities but left a large number of potential runs stranded.
Five runs in the eighth: This was the defining scoring burst.
Four combined RBIs from DeLauter and Hoskins: Their production directly drove the comeback.
6 strikeouts from Hancock and Williams: Both starting pitchers recorded the same number of strikeouts despite very different game outcomes.
26th save for Cade Smith: Smith survived the ninth-inning pressure and secured the victory.
Why the final score can be misleading
A basic 6-5 final score suggests a one-run game from start to finish.
It was not.
Seattle had the upper hand for most of the afternoon.
The Mariners led 1-0 after two innings, 3-0 after three, 3-1 after five, and 4-1 after six.
Cleveland’s five-run eighth completely changed the game.
Then Seattle scored once in the ninth and had the tying run at the plate before Smith closed it out.
This is why inning-by-inning context is essential when analyzing player statistics.
A player can record two hits in a loss and still have a strong individual performance. A pitcher can leave with his team ahead and still watch the victory disappear. A defensive error can appear small in the box score but become crucial because of when it occurs.
The context around the numbers matters.
What this game reveals about player evaluation
The matchup also demonstrates why a single box score should be interpreted carefully.
A hitter’s value in one game cannot be reduced to batting average.
Hoskins had only two official at-bats, but both were hits and both were important. His second hit directly gave Cleveland the lead.
DeLauter went 2-for-5, but his biggest contribution came in a bases-loaded, two-out situation.
Robles had two hits and three stolen bases, yet Seattle still lost.
Hancock allowed only one earned run, but Seattle’s bullpen could not preserve his work.
These examples show why player statistics should be read alongside game situation, inning, baserunner status and leverage.
Series context
Cleveland’s 6-5 win gave the Guardians a 2-1 series victory over Seattle.
The game also followed Cleveland’s 4-3 win on June 27 and Seattle’s 3-1 win on June 26.
The June 28 finale therefore decided the series after the teams had split the first two games.
The Guardians’ comeback was particularly notable because it came after they had trailed for most of the afternoon.
MLB’s game coverage also noted that the Mariners had been struggling to score during this period and that the June 28 result ended their three-game stretch in the series with Cleveland.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Mariners vs Guardians game on June 28, 2026?
The Cleveland Guardians defeated the Seattle Mariners 6-5 at Progressive Field in Cleveland.
What was the final score between Seattle and Cleveland?
The Guardians won 6-5. Seattle had 13 hits and one error, while Cleveland had 12 hits and two errors.
Who was the standout offensive player for Cleveland?
Chase DeLauter and Rhys Hoskins were central to the comeback. DeLauter went 2-for-5 with two RBIs, while Hoskins went 2-for-2 with two RBIs and a double.
Who had the most hits for the Mariners?
J.P. Crawford, Julio Rodríguez, Josh Naylor, Cole Young and Victor Robles each recorded two hits.
Who was the winning pitcher?
Matt Festa earned the win for Cleveland after pitching 1.1 scoreless innings.
Who recorded the save?
Cade Smith recorded his 26th save after pitching a scoreless ninth inning apart from an unearned run.
Conclusion
The June 28, 2026 matchup between Cleveland and Seattle was decided less by total hits than by timing, run conversion and bullpen execution.
Seattle finished with 13 hits, one more than Cleveland, and received a strong start from Emerson Hancock. Julio Rodríguez, Josh Naylor, J.P. Crawford, Cole Young and Victor Robles all produced two-hit games. Robles also stole three bases.
Cleveland, however, converted its most important opportunities more effectively. The Guardians went 4-for-13 with runners in scoring position compared with Seattle’s 2-for-14 mark. Cleveland also received two RBIs each from Chase DeLauter and Rhys Hoskins, with Daniel Schneemann adding another RBI.
The decisive moment came in the eighth inning.
Cleveland entered the frame down 4-1 and scored five times. Schneemann started the scoring push, DeLauter tied the game with a two-run single, and Hoskins followed with the go-ahead two-run double. That sequence turned a game Seattle had controlled for most of the afternoon into a 6-4 Cleveland lead.
Seattle responded with a ninth-inning run after a throwing error, but Cade Smith closed the door.
The broader lesson from the cleveland guardians vs seattle mariners match player stats is that box-score totals need context. Seattle’s higher hit count did not produce the win. Cleveland’s ability to convert high-leverage opportunities, combined with a late offensive surge and more effective relief pitching, ultimately determined the result.
The final cleveland guardians vs seattle mariners match player stats therefore provide a useful example of how baseball games can turn on a small number of high-impact plate appearances rather than overall statistical volume.
Meta Description:
