Baltimore ravens vs Minnesota vikings match player stats
The baltimore ravens vs minnesota vikings match player stats from the August 22, 2026 NFL preseason meeting tell a story that the final score alone does not fully explain. Baltimore defeated Minnesota 13-3 at U.S. Bank Stadium, improving to 2-0 in the preseason, while the Vikings moved to 1-1. The Ravens produced 184 passing yards, 58 rushing yards, and five sacks on defense, while Minnesota generated 234 passing yards and 65 rushing yards but finished without a touchdown and committed the game’s only interception. The NFL’s official game center confirms the 13-3 final score and the quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern.
This was a preseason game, so the numbers need to be interpreted differently from a regular-season box score. Quarterback rotations, reserve players, situational packages, and roster evaluation all influence the statistics. Even so, the matchup provides useful information about individual production, efficiency, ball security, pass protection, defensive pressure, and special teams execution.
For readers searching for baltimore ravens vs minnesota vikings match player stats, this breakdown brings the supplied box-score data together in one place. It covers passing, rushing, receiving, defense, turnovers, special teams, efficiency indicators, and the individual performances that shaped the 13-3 result.
Baltimore Ravens vs. Minnesota Vikings Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game was played on August 22, 2026, as part of NFL preseason Week 2. Baltimore entered the contest 1-0 after defeating the Philadelphia Eagles in Week 1, while Minnesota was also 1-0 after beating the New York Giants.
The Ravens finished the game with a 13-3 victory. Baltimore scored in the second, third, and fourth quarters, while Minnesota’s only points came in the second quarter. The official NFL schedule lists Baltimore as 2-0 after the victory and Minnesota as 1-1.
Game summary
| Category | Baltimore Ravens | Minnesota Vikings |
| Final score | 13 | 3 |
| Passing | 21/30, 184 yards | 25/38, 234 yards |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Passing average | 6.4 yards | 7.1 yards |
| Sacks allowed | 1 for 9 yards | 5 for 37 yards |
| Rushing | 22 carries, 58 yards | 18 carries, 65 yards |
| Rushing average | 2.6 yards | 3.6 yards |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 0 |
| Receptions | 21 | 25 |
| Receiving yards | 193 | 271 |
| Receiving TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Long reception | 27 yards | 50 yards |
| Defensive sacks | 5 | Not fully supplied |
| Punt returns | 1 for 29 yards | Not supplied |
| Punts | 3 for 165 yards | 2 for 83 yards |
The contrast is important. Minnesota gained more passing and rushing yards, yet Baltimore scored more points and avoided the turnover that hurt the Vikings.
That is one of the clearest lessons from this matchup: total yardage does not always translate directly into scoring output.
Baltimore Ravens Passing Stats
Baltimore’s quarterbacks combined to complete 21 of 30 passes for 184 yards. The team averaged 6.4 yards per pass attempt according to the supplied box score and finished with one passing touchdown and no interceptions.
The Ravens also surrendered only one sack for nine yards.
Joe Fagnano
Joe Fagnano was Baltimore’s most productive passer in the game.
His line:
- 15 completions
- 20 attempts
- 123 passing yards
- 1 touchdown
- 0 interceptions
Fagnano completed 75% of his passes, which was the highest completion rate among Baltimore’s quarterbacks in the supplied statistics.
The most important part of his performance was not simply the completion percentage. He also protected the football while producing the Ravens’ only passing touchdown.
For a preseason quarterback, that combination matters because coaches are evaluating decision-making as well as raw yardage. A quarterback who consistently reaches his reads, completes manageable throws, and avoids turnovers gives the offense more opportunities to sustain possessions.
Tyler Huntley
Tyler Huntley completed 5 of 8 attempts for 63 yards.
His numbers were:
- 5 completions
- 8 attempts
- 63 yards
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
Huntley averaged 7.9 yards per attempt based on the supplied passing figures.
His sample was much smaller than Fagnano’s, so direct comparisons need to be treated carefully. Still, the 63 yards on eight attempts provided Baltimore with efficient passing production during his time on the field.
Austin Reed
Austin Reed finished 1 of 2 passing for seven yards.
He recorded:
- 1 completion
- 2 attempts
- 7 yards
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
His limited workload means there is little value in drawing broad conclusions from the two attempts alone.
Baltimore’s quarterback picture
Taken together, the Ravens completed 70% of their passes, recorded 184 yards, threw one touchdown, and avoided an interception.
The most useful statistical takeaway is the combination of completion rate and ball security. Baltimore did not need a large passing total to control the scoring column because its offense paired mistake-free quarterback play with a defense that consistently created pressure.
Minnesota Vikings Passing Stats
Minnesota’s quarterbacks combined for 25 completions on 38 attempts, 234 yards, no touchdowns, and one interception.
The Vikings produced more passing yardage than Baltimore, but the extra production did not result in a touchdown.
Max Brosmer
Max Brosmer completed 11 of 17 passes for 98 yards.
His statistics were:
- 11 completions
- 17 attempts
- 98 yards
- 0 touchdowns
- 1 interception
Brosmer’s interception was especially significant because Baltimore did not throw one. In a low-scoring game, a single turnover can have a large impact on possession value.
Carson Wentz
Carson Wentz completed 9 of 11 passes for 92 yards.
His line included:
- 9 completions
- 11 attempts
- 92 yards
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
Wentz completed more than 80% of his attempts in the supplied figures and generated 92 yards from only 11 attempts.
That efficiency contributed to Minnesota’s strong overall passing yardage, although the offense still finished without a passing touchdown.
J.J. McCarthy
J.J. McCarthy completed 5 of 10 passes for 81 yards.
His numbers were:
- 5 completions
- 10 attempts
- 81 yards
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
His 81 passing yards came on 10 attempts, giving him the highest yards-per-attempt figure among Minnesota’s three listed quarterbacks.
The sample was limited, however, and the completion rate was 50%, so the numbers show both explosive potential and inconsistency within the small preseason workload.
Passing Comparison: What the Numbers Really Show
At first glance, Minnesota’s passing attack appears more productive because it accumulated 234 yards compared with Baltimore’s 184.
But the scoring result points toward a more complicated interpretation.
Baltimore:
- 184 passing yards
- 1 passing touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 1 sack allowed
Minnesota:
- 234 passing yards
- 0 passing touchdowns
- 1 interception
- 5 sacks allowed
The Ravens therefore combined fewer passing yards with better touchdown and turnover outcomes.
Minnesota’s five sacks are particularly important. The Vikings allowed 37 yards through those sacks, compared with only nine sack yards allowed by Baltimore.
This difference affected the practical value of the passing production. A quarterback can accumulate passing yardage while an offense still struggles if negative plays repeatedly interrupt drives.
Baltimore Ravens Rushing Stats
Baltimore recorded 22 rushing attempts for 58 yards.
The Ravens averaged 2.6 yards per rushing attempt and had no rushing touchdowns. Their longest run was eight yards.
The leading Baltimore rusher was Jonathan Ward.
Jonathan Ward
Ward carried the ball 10 times for 35 yards.
His rushing line:
- 10 carries
- 35 yards
- 3.5 yards per carry
- 0 touchdowns
- 6-yard long
Ward accounted for nearly half of Baltimore’s rushing attempts.
His workload is noteworthy because preseason games often give reserve running backs an opportunity to demonstrate consistency, vision, and ability to finish runs. His 35 yards made him Baltimore’s leading rusher even though the team as a whole struggled to create significant rushing efficiency.
Baltimore’s rushing performance
The Ravens averaged only 2.6 yards per carry as a team.
That figure shows that Baltimore’s offensive success did not come from a dominant rushing attack. Instead, the team relied more heavily on passing efficiency, defensive pressure, and avoiding major mistakes.
The absence of a rushing touchdown also reinforces the importance of the defense and passing game in producing the final 13 points.
Minnesota Vikings Rushing Stats
Minnesota finished with 18 rushing attempts for 65 yards.
The Vikings averaged 3.6 yards per carry and did not score a rushing touchdown. Their longest run covered 15 yards.
Zavier Scott
Zavier Scott led Minnesota’s rushing attack with:
- 7 carries
- 28 yards
- 4.0 yards per carry
- 0 touchdowns
- 9-yard long
Scott’s 4.0-yard average was better than Minnesota’s overall team average, although his seven carries represented less than half of the team’s rushing attempts.
Minnesota’s rushing picture
The Vikings gained seven more rushing yards than Baltimore despite having four fewer attempts.
That produced a 1.0-yard advantage in yards per carry.
However, Minnesota also failed to turn its rushing production into a touchdown. The offense generated yardage but could not consistently convert that production into points.
Receiving Stats: Baltimore Ravens
Baltimore recorded 21 receptions for 193 yards and one touchdown.
The team averaged 9.2 yards per reception and produced a longest reception of 27 yards.
Josh Cuevas
Josh Cuevas was Baltimore’s leading receiver by yardage.
He finished with:
- 3 receptions
- 46 yards
- 15.3 yards per reception
- 0 touchdowns
- 23-yard long
- 4 targets
His 46 yards represented the highest receiving total among the Ravens’ listed individual receivers.
The 23-yard reception also shows that Baltimore was capable of creating meaningful gains without relying on a large number of catches from one player.
LaJohntay Wester
LaJohntay Wester was responsible for Baltimore’s receiving touchdown.
His line included:
- 5 targets
- 3 receptions
- 24 yards
- 1 touchdown
- 8-yard long
The touchdown came on a relatively short reception, highlighting an important distinction in offensive analysis. A player’s value cannot always be understood from yardage totals alone.
Wester also contributed in the return game, recording one punt return for 29 yards.
That combination gave him involvement in multiple phases of the game.
Minnesota Vikings Receiving Stats
Minnesota’s receivers combined for 25 receptions and 271 yards.
The Vikings averaged 10.8 yards per reception and produced a 50-yard longest reception.
Tai Felton
Tai Felton led Minnesota in receiving yardage.
His statistics:
- 3 receptions
- 66 yards
- 22.0 yards per reception
- 0 touchdowns
- 50-yard long
- 4 targets
The 50-yard reception was the longest offensive play listed in the supplied box score.
Felton’s 66 yards on only three catches demonstrate how a small number of explosive plays can significantly affect a receiver’s statistical line.
Jeshaun Jones
Jeshaun Jones recorded:
- 5 receptions
- 63 yards
- 12.6 yards per reception
- 0 touchdowns
- 36-yard long
- 6 targets
Jones was highly involved in Minnesota’s passing game, leading the Vikings in receptions among the listed players.
However, he also recorded the game’s only lost fumble.
That turnover became an important part of the overall statistical story because Minnesota already struggled to convert yardage into touchdowns.
Receiving Comparison
Minnesota produced 271 receiving yards compared with Baltimore’s 193.
That is a difference of 78 yards in favor of the Vikings.
Minnesota also averaged 10.8 yards per reception, compared with Baltimore’s 9.2.
Yet Baltimore scored the only receiving touchdown.
This is another example of why box-score analysis should look beyond raw yardage.
The Vikings generated more explosive receiving production, including a 50-yard reception from Tai Felton, but they did not convert that yardage into a touchdown.
Baltimore’s receiving group generated fewer yards but contributed to the game’s only passing touchdown.
Defensive Player Stats for Baltimore
Baltimore’s defense recorded:
- 68 total tackles
- 44 solo tackles
- 5 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 9 quarterback hits
- 0 defensive touchdowns
The defensive pressure numbers stand out.
Five sacks and nine quarterback hits created repeated disruption against Minnesota’s quarterbacks.
Keondre Jackson
Keondre Jackson led Baltimore with eight total tackles.
His individual statistics were:
- 8 total tackles
- 6 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 2 tackles for loss
Jackson’s eight tackles were the highest total listed for Baltimore.
His two tackles for loss also show that his contribution was not limited to finishing plays after the ball carrier had already gained significant ground.
Baltimore’s sack production
The Ravens recorded five sacks in total.
The supplied statistics credit:
- Keondre Jackson: 1 sack
- Dominic DeLuca: 1 sack
- K’Von Wallace: 1 sack
- Amani Oruwariye: 1 sack
- Rayshaun Benny: 0.5 sack
- Aeneas Peebles: 0.5 sack
The distribution is significant because the pressure came from multiple defenders rather than one player accounting for the entire total.
That kind of distribution can make it harder for an opposing offense to identify one obvious pressure source.
Minnesota Defensive Statistics
The supplied Minnesota defensive data is partially truncated.
Because of that limitation, it would not be responsible to invent individual tackle, sack, interception, or pass-defense totals for Vikings defenders.
The most reliable conclusion from the supplied information is therefore based on the offensive and overall game statistics rather than an incomplete defensive player table.
This is an important distinction for anyone using preseason box scores for fantasy research, roster evaluation, or statistical content. Missing information should be identified rather than filled with assumptions.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers played a major role in the game.
Baltimore recorded:
- 0 interceptions thrown
- 0 lost fumbles listed for the team
- 1 fumble recovery by Amani Oruwariye
Minnesota recorded:
- 1 interception thrown
- 1 lost fumble by Jeshaun Jones
That gave Minnesota two significant turnover events while Baltimore avoided an interception and did not lose a fumble in the supplied statistics.
In a game that ended 13-3, those possessions matter.
The Ravens did not need to produce overwhelming offensive yardage because they protected the football and allowed their defense to repeatedly create pressure.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams also contributed useful information to the statistical picture.
Baltimore punting
Baltimore punted three times for 165 yards.
That produced:
- 3 punts
- 165 total yards
- 55.0-yard average
- 65-yard long
A 65-yard punt was the longest punt recorded in the supplied data.
Minnesota punting
Minnesota punted twice for 83 yards:
- 2 punts
- 83 total yards
- 41.5-yard average
- 42-yard long
Across both teams, there were five punts for 248 yards, producing a combined average of 49.6 yards per punt.
Punt returns
LaJohntay Wester returned one Baltimore punt for 29 yards.
His return average was 29.0 yards, with a 29-yard long and no touchdown.
That gave Wester another statistical contribution beyond his receiving touchdown.
Minnesota kick returns
Minnesota recorded four kick returns for 79 yards.
The individual figures supplied were:
- Trayvon Rudolph: 2 returns, 42 yards, 21.0 average, 24-yard long
- Demond Claiborne: 1 return, 21 yards
- Dillon Bell: 1 return, 16 yards
The Vikings averaged 19.8 yards per kick return as a team.
The Most Important Statistical Differences
The final score was only 13-3, so the statistical margins were relatively narrow in some categories.
However, several differences stand out.
1. Baltimore protected the football
The Ravens threw no interceptions.
Minnesota threw one interception and lost one fumble.
In a preseason game, where evaluation is often more important than the final record, turnovers still influence possession opportunities and field position.
2. Baltimore generated more defensive pressure
The Ravens recorded five sacks and nine quarterback hits.
Minnesota’s passing game therefore faced repeated disruption.
The Vikings actually gained 50 more passing yards than Baltimore, but the Ravens’ ability to create negative plays helped limit scoring.
3. Minnesota generated more receiving yards
The Vikings had 271 receiving yards compared with 193 for Baltimore.
Their 50-yard reception from Tai Felton was also the longest reception supplied in the box score.
Despite that advantage, Minnesota did not score a passing touchdown.
4. Baltimore converted passing production into points
The Ravens produced 184 passing yards and one touchdown.
That touchdown was enough to give Baltimore a key scoring advantage in a low-scoring game.
5. Neither team ran for a touchdown
Both teams recorded zero rushing touchdowns.
Baltimore averaged 2.6 yards per carry, while Minnesota averaged 3.6.
The running game therefore was not the primary reason for the final scoring difference.
What the Player Stats Say About the Game
A useful way to interpret the game is to separate volume from efficiency.
Minnesota had more offensive yardage in several areas.
The Vikings recorded:
- 234 passing yards
- 65 rushing yards
- 271 receiving yards
- 25 completions
- 25 receptions
Baltimore recorded:
- 184 passing yards
- 58 rushing yards
- 193 receiving yards
- 21 completions
- 21 receptions
On raw yardage, Minnesota’s offense looks productive.
But Baltimore won the categories that directly affected the scoreboard:
- Passing touchdowns: Baltimore 1, Minnesota 0
- Interceptions: Baltimore 0, Minnesota 1
- Sacks allowed: Baltimore 1, Minnesota 5
- Final score: Baltimore 13, Minnesota 3
This is why simply sorting players by yards can provide an incomplete picture.
A receiver with 66 yards can have a bigger statistical total than a receiver with 24 yards and a touchdown, but the touchdown may have greater direct impact on the game’s scoring.
Likewise, 234 passing yards do not necessarily indicate a more successful offensive performance when the team finishes without a touchdown and loses two possessions through turnovers.
Why the Quarterback Numbers Need Context
Preseason quarterback statistics are particularly sensitive to playing time.
A quarterback who throws 20 passes has a much larger sample than one who throws two.
That is why Fagnano’s 15-of-20 performance can be discussed more confidently as a statistical sample than Reed’s 1-of-2 line.
The same principle applies to Minnesota’s quarterbacks.
Brosmer threw 17 passes, Wentz threw 11, and McCarthy threw 10.
Their statistical lines should therefore be considered in relation to workload rather than treated as if all three received identical opportunities.
This is especially important when evaluating young quarterbacks. Completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdown rate, interception rate, sack rate, and total attempts all provide different pieces of information.
No single statistic fully describes the performance.
Why the Receiving Numbers Need Context
The receiving totals also demonstrate the importance of targets.
Josh Cuevas caught three passes on four targets for 46 yards.
Tai Felton caught three passes on four targets for 66 yards.
Their reception totals were identical, but their yardage totals were not.
Felton’s 50-yard reception accounted for a large share of his production.
Jeshaun Jones, meanwhile, had five catches on six targets for 63 yards.
His higher reception volume shows a different type of contribution.
These differences can be useful when studying player roles. A receiver producing through explosive plays may have a different offensive function from one who consistently receives short or intermediate targets.
Why the Defensive Numbers Matter
Baltimore’s five sacks were arguably among the most important team statistics.
The Vikings averaged 7.1 yards per pass attempt based on their supplied team passing figures, which is a respectable number.
But the five sacks changed the overall efficiency picture.
Sacks are recorded separately from passing attempts in traditional box-score statistics, meaning raw passing yardage does not fully capture the cost of losing 37 yards on five sacks.
The Ravens also recorded nine quarterback hits.
That indicates repeated contact and pressure even on plays that did not end in sacks.
For a preseason defense, pressure from multiple players can be a useful indicator of depth because reserve defenders are often competing for roster positions and rotational roles.
A Closer Look at the 13-3 Scoring Pattern
The official NFL game center shows Baltimore scored three points in the second quarter, seven in the third, and three in the fourth. Minnesota scored its only three points in the second quarter.
That scoring pattern reflects a game that remained relatively close early before Baltimore created separation after halftime.
The Ravens did not produce a huge offensive explosion.
Instead, the game developed through small advantages:
- Baltimore avoided interceptions.
- Baltimore created five sacks.
- Baltimore produced a passing touchdown.
- Minnesota lost a fumble.
- Minnesota failed to score a touchdown despite producing 234 passing yards.
Those factors combined to create a 10-point margin.
Baltimore’s Most Notable Individual Contributors
Based on the supplied player statistics, several Ravens players stood out in different areas.
Joe Fagnano
Fagnano led Baltimore’s quarterbacks in completions, attempts, passing yards, and touchdown production.
His 15-of-20 passing line gave him the largest workload among the Ravens’ listed quarterbacks.
Jonathan Ward
Ward led Baltimore in rushing with 35 yards on 10 carries.
His 3.5 yards per carry was also above the team’s 2.6-yard rushing average.
Josh Cuevas
Cuevas led Baltimore in receiving yardage with 46 yards.
He averaged 15.3 yards per reception.
LaJohntay Wester
Wester scored Baltimore’s receiving touchdown and also returned a punt 29 yards.
His contributions came in both offense and special teams.
Keondre Jackson
Jackson led Baltimore with eight total tackles and added a sack and two tackles for loss.
His statistics demonstrate involvement in both conventional tackling and backfield disruption.
Minnesota’s Most Notable Individual Contributors
Max Brosmer
Brosmer led Minnesota in passing attempts and completions among the supplied quarterback lines.
He finished with 98 yards and one interception.
Carson Wentz
Wentz completed nine of 11 attempts for 92 yards without an interception.
His completion percentage was the highest among the three listed Minnesota quarterbacks.
J.J. McCarthy
McCarthy produced 81 passing yards on 10 attempts and did not throw an interception.
His 81 yards were generated from a smaller sample than Brosmer’s workload.
Zavier Scott
Scott led the Vikings in rushing with 28 yards on seven attempts.
He averaged 4.0 yards per carry.
Tai Felton
Felton led Minnesota in receiving yards with 66 and produced the game’s longest reception at 50 yards.
Jeshaun Jones
Jones led Minnesota in receptions among the supplied receiving statistics with five catches.
He also recorded the team’s lost fumble.
What Fantasy Football Readers Should Take From the Box Score
Preseason statistics should not automatically be treated as a direct forecast of regular-season fantasy production.
The player usage in August can be shaped by evaluation, rotation, injury management, and roster competition.
Still, the box score can provide useful context.
For receivers, targets can reveal involvement even when yardage is modest.
For quarterbacks, completion rate and turnover avoidance can show how efficiently a player handled his opportunities.
For running backs, carry volume can help identify which players received substantial workloads.
For defensive players, sacks, quarterback hits, tackles for loss, and pass defenses can show where pressure was generated.
The key is to use the statistics as evidence of what happened in this game rather than automatically projecting the same usage into the regular season.
How to Read This Box Score Correctly
Readers comparing these numbers should focus on five questions.
Who produced the most?
Look at both volume and efficiency.
A player with many attempts may have a large total because of opportunity, while another player may produce more efficiently on fewer chances.
Who created points?
Touchdowns and field goals matter more directly to the final score than yardage totals.
Who protected the ball?
Turnovers can erase otherwise productive offensive possessions.
Who created negative plays?
Sacks and tackles for loss can change drive outcomes without necessarily appearing in conventional offensive yardage totals.
Which numbers came from a large sample?
Preseason box scores often contain very different workloads.
A 20-attempt quarterback sample should not be interpreted in exactly the same way as a two-attempt sample.
Baltimore Ravens vs. Minnesota Vikings Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The baltimore ravens vs minnesota vikings match player stats provide several clear conclusions from the August 22 preseason matchup.
Baltimore won 13-3 despite producing fewer total passing and receiving yards.
The Ravens’ passing unit completed 21 of 30 attempts for 184 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.
Joe Fagnano was Baltimore’s leading passer with 123 yards and a touchdown.
Jonathan Ward led the rushing attack with 35 yards.
Josh Cuevas led the Ravens in receiving yardage with 46 yards.
LaJohntay Wester scored the receiving touchdown and also contributed a 29-yard punt return.
Defensively, Keondre Jackson led the Ravens with eight tackles and recorded one sack. Baltimore’s defense finished with five sacks and nine quarterback hits.
Minnesota’s offense produced more passing yardage, receiving yardage, and rushing yardage than Baltimore, but it did not turn those numbers into touchdowns.
Tai Felton led the Vikings with 66 receiving yards and produced a 50-yard reception.
Jeshaun Jones caught five passes for 63 yards but also lost a fumble.
The biggest statistical difference may have been pass protection. Minnesota allowed five sacks for 37 yards, while Baltimore allowed one sack for nine yards.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score of the Ravens vs. Vikings preseason game?
The Baltimore Ravens defeated the Minnesota Vikings 13-3 on August 22, 2026, at U.S. Bank Stadium.
Who was Baltimore’s leading passer?
Joe Fagnano led Baltimore’s listed quarterbacks with 15 completions on 20 attempts for 123 yards and one touchdown.
Who was Baltimore’s leading rusher?
Jonathan Ward led the Ravens with 10 carries for 35 yards.
Who led the Vikings in receiving?
Tai Felton led Minnesota with three receptions for 66 yards, including a 50-yard reception.
How many sacks did the Ravens record?
Baltimore recorded five sacks. Keondre Jackson, Dominic DeLuca, K’Von Wallace, Amani Oruwariye, Rayshaun Benny, and Aeneas Peebles were credited with the supplied sack totals, with Benny and Peebles each receiving half a sack.
Did either team throw an interception?
Yes. Minnesota threw one interception, while Baltimore’s quarterbacks combined for zero interceptions.
Conclusion
The baltimore ravens vs minnesota vikings match player stats show why a detailed box-score review can reveal much more than the final 13-3 score.
Minnesota produced 234 passing yards compared with Baltimore’s 184 and finished with 271 receiving yards compared with Baltimore’s 193. The Vikings also gained 65 rushing yards, seven more than Baltimore.
Yet Baltimore controlled the most important scoring-related areas. The Ravens threw one touchdown without an interception, generated five sacks, allowed only one sack, and avoided the lost-fumble problem that affected Minnesota.
Joe Fagnano provided Baltimore with the largest quarterback workload and threw the game’s passing touchdown. Jonathan Ward led the rushing attack, Josh Cuevas topped the team in receiving yardage, and LaJohntay Wester contributed both a touchdown reception and a 29-yard punt return.
For Minnesota, Tai Felton’s 66 receiving yards and 50-yard catch were notable, while Jeshaun Jones provided five receptions for 63 yards but also lost a fumble. The Vikings’ quarterbacks collectively produced more passing yardage than Baltimore’s group, but the offense could not convert that production into a touchdown.
The most useful statistical lesson from the matchup is that yardage alone does not determine offensive effectiveness. Turnovers, sacks, touchdowns, field position, and efficiency can have a much larger influence on the final score, particularly in a low-scoring preseason game.
