Lakers vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats

The lakers vs charlotte hornets match player stats from January 28, 2025, tell the story of a competitive game in which the Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Charlotte Hornets 112-107 at Spectrum Center in Charlotte. The Lakers built a strong early advantage, survived a major Hornets response in the second quarter, and relied heavily on Anthony Davis’ dominant interior performance to secure the five-point victory.

Davis finished with 42 points and 23 rebounds, producing one of the most influential individual performances in the game. LeBron James added 22 points, seven rebounds, and eight assists, while Austin Reaves contributed 17 points, five rebounds, six assists, and three steals. For Charlotte, Miles Bridges led the team with 26 points and eight rebounds, while Josh Green provided 15 points on an efficient 4-of-6 shooting performance from three-point range.

The final score does not completely explain how the game developed. Los Angeles started exceptionally well by scoring 39 points in the opening quarter, but Charlotte responded with 32 points in the second and 30 more in the fourth. The Lakers ultimately stayed ahead because of their superior overall shooting efficiency, rebounding advantage, and Davis’ production around the basket.

Lakers vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats

The following table provides the central player statistics from the January 28 meeting.

Player	Points	FG	3PT	FT	Rebounds	Assists	Other
Anthony Davis	42	17-28	0-2	8-10	23	2	4 TO, 2 BLK
LeBron James	22	9-17	1-8	3-5	7	8	5 TO
Austin Reaves	17	5-14	2-8	5-7	5	6	1 TO, 3 STL
Max Christie	10	3-8	3-6	1-1	2	3	2 TO, 1 BLK
Jaxson Hayes	9	4-5	0-0	1-1	0	1	2 STL, 2 BLK
Dorian Finney-Smith	6	3-4	0-1	0-0	5	0	1 TO, 1 STL
Jarred Vanderbilt	4	2-5	0-0	0-0	2	1	2 STL
Dalton Knecht	2	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1 STL
Shake Milton	0	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	1
Miles Bridges	26	10-23	2-11	4-4	8	4	2 TO, 1 STL, 1 BLK
Josh Okogie	19	6-11	3-6	4-5	2	2	2 TO, 4 STL
Josh Green	15	4-6	4-6	3-3	1	1	2 TO, 3 STL
Mark Williams	11	5-13	0-0	1-2	8	5	1 STL, 1 BLK
Vasilije Micic	11	5-11	1-3	0-0	2	4	5 TO
LaMelo Ball	7	2-5	2-3	1-2	0	1	1 STL
DaQuan Jeffries	5	1-2	1-2	2-2	5	2	3 OREB
Isaiah Wong	5	2-3	1-1	0-0	1	1	1 STL
Nick Smith Jr.	4	2-8	0-4	0-0	1	6	1 BLK
Moussa Diabate	4	2-4	0-0	0-0	4	0	2 OREB
Taj Gibson	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0
Seth Curry	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0

Game Overview

The Lakers entered the game with a 26-18 record and were 10-12 on the road. Charlotte entered at 12-31 overall and 8-15 at home. Despite the difference in records, the game itself became a competitive four-quarter contest.

Los Angeles scored 39 points in the first quarter while Charlotte managed only 19. That 20-point difference gave the Lakers immediate control.

Charlotte, however, did not allow the game to become a runaway result.

The Hornets responded by scoring 32 points in the second quarter while limiting Los Angeles to 20. At halftime, the Lakers still held the advantage, but Charlotte had substantially reduced the damage created during the opening period.

The third quarter remained competitive. Los Angeles scored 27 points and Charlotte scored 26. The Lakers therefore carried a 10-point advantage into the final period.

Charlotte then produced another strong offensive quarter, scoring 30 points. Los Angeles answered with 26, but the Lakers had built enough of a cushion earlier in the game to protect the lead.

The final score was 112-107.

That five-point margin reflects a game that changed significantly after the first quarter. The Lakers’ early efficiency was important, but their ability to withstand Charlotte’s sustained comeback attempt was equally important.

Anthony Davis Dominates the Interior

Anthony Davis was the statistical centerpiece of the contest.

He scored 42 points on 17-of-28 shooting, giving him a field-goal percentage of approximately 61%. He also converted eight of his ten free throws and collected 23 rebounds.

The rebounding figure is particularly important.

Davis did not simply score efficiently. He controlled possessions after missed shots and repeatedly gave Los Angeles an advantage on the glass. His 23 rebounds represented nearly half of the Lakers’ 48 total rebounds.

His two blocks also show that his impact extended beyond scoring and rebounding.

One useful way to understand Davis’ performance is to separate scoring volume from scoring efficiency. A player can score 40 points by taking a large number of difficult attempts, but Davis reached 42 points while making 17 of his 28 field-goal attempts.

He attempted only two three-pointers, making neither, but that was not a major issue because his offensive production was concentrated in areas where he was highly effective.

His eight-of-ten free-throw shooting also added valuable points without requiring additional field-goal attempts.

From a team perspective, Davis’ performance gave the Lakers a reliable interior scoring source throughout the game.

LeBron James Provides All-Around Production

LeBron James finished with 22 points, seven rebounds, and eight assists.

His shooting line was 9-of-17 from the field, 1-of-8 from three-point range, and 3-of-5 from the free-throw line.

The three-point numbers were not especially efficient, but James’ overall contribution was broader than his scoring total.

His eight assists were the highest total among the Lakers listed in the supplied statistics. That playmaking helped distribute offensive responsibility rather than requiring every possession to end with a shot from James.

He also collected seven rebounds.

The biggest statistical drawback was his five turnovers. That number was higher than the four turnovers recorded by Davis, even though James had a significant role in organizing the offense.

This illustrates why a player stat line should not be judged only by points.

James contributed scoring, rebounding, and playmaking, while also committing turnovers and struggling from long range. Looking at the complete line provides a more accurate picture of his role.

Austin Reaves Adds Scoring and Playmaking

Austin Reaves recorded 17 points, five rebounds, and six assists.

He shot 5-of-14 from the field and 2-of-8 from three-point range. At the free-throw line, he made five of seven attempts.

His six assists were particularly useful because they gave Los Angeles another creator alongside James.

Reaves also recorded three steals while committing only one turnover.

That combination stands out. His scoring was not as efficient as Davis’ performance, but his ability to contribute in several statistical categories helped the Lakers maintain offensive and defensive activity.

The three steals also represented one-third of the Lakers’ nine total steals when considered alongside the supplied team figures.

Lakers Supporting Cast

The Lakers did not receive their entire production from Davis and James.

Max Christie scored 10 points and made three of six attempts from three-point range. That 50% conversion rate from deep provided useful perimeter scoring.

Jaxson Hayes scored nine points while shooting four of five from the field and making his only free-throw attempt. He also recorded two steals and two blocks.

Dorian Finney-Smith added six points on three-of-four shooting and collected five rebounds.

Jarred Vanderbilt contributed four points and two steals.

Dalton Knecht scored two points and added two rebounds and one steal, while Shake Milton finished without a field goal and recorded two rebounds and one assist.

The supporting numbers demonstrate that Los Angeles had several players contributing in areas beyond scoring.

Charlotte Hornets Offensive Leaders

Miles Bridges led Charlotte with 26 points.

He shot 10-of-23 from the field, made two of 11 three-point attempts, and converted all four of his free throws. He also collected eight rebounds and four assists.

His scoring total was important because Charlotte needed consistent production after falling behind in the opening quarter.

Josh Okogie was another major contributor.

He scored 19 points on 6-of-11 shooting and made three of six attempts from three-point range. He also went four-of-five at the free-throw line and recorded four steals.

Josh Green was particularly efficient.

He scored 15 points while making four of six shots from the field and all four of his three-point attempts. He also converted all three of his free throws.

Green’s 4-of-6 three-point shooting was one of Charlotte’s clearest examples of perimeter efficiency in the game.

Mark Williams and Charlotte’s Interior Contributions

Mark Williams finished with 11 points, eight rebounds, and five assists.

He shot five-of-13 from the field and added one free throw from two attempts.

The five assists are notable for a center because they show that his contribution was not limited to finishing plays around the basket.

However, his eight rebounds were matched by Bridges, while Davis’ 23 rebounds created a significant contrast between the teams’ leading interior rebounders.

Moussa Diabate added four points and four rebounds, including two offensive rebounds.

DaQuan Jeffries also produced five rebounds, with three coming on the offensive glass.

These contributions helped Charlotte finish with 34 total rebounds, although Los Angeles ultimately controlled the overall rebounding battle with 48.

LaMelo Ball’s Limited Statistical Output

LaMelo Ball finished with seven points, making two of five field-goal attempts and two of three from three-point range.

He also converted one of two free throws.

His supplied stat line included no rebounds and one assist, along with one turnover and one steal.

The seven-point total was below the production of several other Charlotte players in this game.

Because Charlotte received 26 points from Bridges, 19 from Okogie, and 15 from Green, the Hornets still had multiple scoring options. However, Ball’s limited overall production meant the team did not receive a large offensive contribution from one of its key perimeter players.

Shooting Efficiency Explains Part of the Result

The team shooting numbers provide an important explanation for the final score.

Los Angeles made 44 of 86 field-goal attempts, producing a 51% field-goal percentage.

Charlotte made 39 of 87 attempts, producing a 45% field-goal percentage.

That six-percentage-point difference was meaningful.

Charlotte actually made substantially more three-pointers. The Hornets converted 14 of 36 attempts from three-point range, or approximately 39%.

The Lakers made only six of 28 attempts from deep, or approximately 21%.

This means Los Angeles did not win because it dominated the three-point line.

Instead, the Lakers made up for their perimeter disadvantage through stronger overall field-goal efficiency, interior scoring, rebounding, and free-throw opportunities.

Los Angeles also shot 75% from the free-throw line, making 18 of 24.

Charlotte was more accurate at the line, shooting 83% by making 15 of 18.

The difference was therefore volume as well as accuracy. Los Angeles had six more free-throw attempts and made three more free throws.

The Rebounding Battle Was Significant

The Lakers collected 48 rebounds compared with Charlotte’s 34.

That is a 14-rebound advantage.

Davis accounted for 23 of Los Angeles’ rebounds by himself.

This is one of the clearest statistical differences in the game.

Rebounding affects more than the box score. Defensive rebounds can end an opponent’s possession, while offensive rebounds can create additional scoring opportunities.

Charlotte’s 34 rebounds were not insignificant, and several players contributed. Bridges and Williams each recorded eight, while Jeffries collected five and Diabate four.

But the Lakers’ overall advantage was substantial.

When a team shoots only 21% from three-point range, controlling the glass becomes even more valuable because it can compensate for missed perimeter shots and reduce second-chance opportunities for the opponent.

Assists and Ball Movement

Charlotte recorded 26 assists compared with Los Angeles’ 22.

This is an interesting part of the box score because the team with more assists did not win the game.

Charlotte’s 26 assists indicate that the Hornets generated a substantial amount of assisted offense.

Mark Williams had five assists, Miles Bridges had four, and Vasilije Micic also recorded four.

Nick Smith Jr. finished with six assists despite scoring only four points.

For Los Angeles, LeBron James led with eight assists and Austin Reaves followed with six.

The Lakers therefore received 14 of their 22 assists from James and Reaves.

This distribution highlights the different ways the teams created offense. Charlotte received playmaking from several players, while the Lakers’ primary creation was more concentrated among their two leading perimeter initiators.

Turnovers Changed the Possession Battle

Los Angeles committed 16 turnovers.

Charlotte committed 14.

The Hornets therefore had a two-turnover advantage in this category.

That is another reason the final result cannot be explained by one statistical category alone.

Los Angeles lost more possessions through turnovers, while Charlotte gained a small advantage in that area. However, the Lakers offset this disadvantage through their 48-34 rebounding advantage and superior overall field-goal percentage.

LeBron James had five turnovers, and Anthony Davis had four.

For Charlotte, Vasilije Micic recorded five turnovers, while several other players had smaller totals.

The turnover numbers show that both teams had areas of offensive vulnerability.

Defensive Activity

Los Angeles recorded nine steals and five blocks.

Charlotte recorded 11 steals and three blocks.

The Hornets therefore generated more steals, while Los Angeles had the stronger total in blocks.

Austin Reaves led the Lakers with three steals. Jaxson Hayes and Jarred Vanderbilt each added two.

For Charlotte, Josh Okogie recorded four steals, while Josh Green added three.

These numbers demonstrate that Charlotte’s defensive pressure was active even though the team allowed 112 points.

The Lakers’ five blocks, including two from Davis and two from Hayes, were another indication of their ability to challenge shots near the basket.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The scoring pattern is one of the most useful ways to understand the contest.

Quarter	Lakers	Hornets	Lakers Margin
Q1	39	19	+20
Q2	20	32	-12
Q3	27	26	+1
Q4	26	30	-4
Total	112	107	+5

The first quarter effectively created the foundation of the Lakers’ victory.

A 39-19 opening period gave Los Angeles a 20-point advantage.

Charlotte then won the second quarter by 12 points, reducing the deficit substantially.

The third quarter was almost even, with Los Angeles holding a one-point advantage.

The Hornets also won the fourth quarter by four points.

This means Charlotte outscored Los Angeles across the final three quarters by a combined margin, yet the Lakers still won because of the scale of their first-quarter advantage.

That is an important lesson when reviewing game statistics. A final score can conceal momentum shifts. Quarter-by-quarter data reveals that this was not a game in which Los Angeles controlled every phase.

Why the First Quarter Mattered So Much

The Lakers’ 39-point first quarter was the largest scoring separation of the game.

Charlotte scored only 19 points during that period.

A 20-point opening-quarter advantage is difficult to erase, even when the trailing team responds effectively.

Charlotte did exactly that.

The Hornets scored 32 in the second quarter and 30 in the fourth, demonstrating that their offense was capable of producing strong stretches.

However, the early deficit meant that later offensive success had to overcome a large accumulated margin.

This is why the Lakers’ first-quarter performance deserves attention even though the Hornets became increasingly competitive as the game progressed.

A Closer Look at the Three-Point Contrast

The three-point numbers create one of the most interesting contrasts in the box score.

Los Angeles made six of 28 attempts.

Charlotte made 14 of 36.

That means Charlotte made eight more three-pointers than Los Angeles.

Despite this significant difference, the Hornets lost by five.

The explanation is found in the rest of the shooting profile.

Los Angeles shot 51% overall.

Charlotte shot 45%.

The Lakers also had 48 rebounds compared with 34 for Charlotte.

Davis’ 42 points and 23 rebounds were particularly influential because his production came primarily from inside the arc.

This game therefore provides a useful example of why three-point totals alone cannot determine the outcome of a basketball game.

Perimeter shooting can create a major advantage, but that advantage can be offset by interior scoring, rebounding, field-goal efficiency, and free-throw volume.

Comparing the Main Player Contributions

A simple points comparison shows Davis leading all scorers with 42, followed by Bridges with 26 and James with 22.

But points alone do not tell the complete story.

Davis combined scoring with 23 rebounds and two blocks.

James combined 22 points with seven rebounds and eight assists.

Reaves contributed 17 points, five rebounds, six assists, and three steals.

Bridges recorded 26 points, eight rebounds, and four assists.

Okogie scored 19 points and added four steals.

Green produced 15 points while shooting 4-of-6 from three-point range.

This broader comparison shows that the game contained several meaningful individual performances on both sides.

What the Box Score Says About Each Team

The Lakers’ statistical profile was built around three major strengths:

1. Overall shooting efficiency: Los Angeles shot 51% from the field.
2. Rebounding: The Lakers held a 48-34 advantage.
3. Interior production: Davis generated 42 points and 23 rebounds.

The Hornets’ strongest statistical areas included:

1. Three-point shooting: Charlotte made 14 of 36 attempts.
2. Assists: The Hornets recorded 26 assists.
3. Steals: Charlotte produced 11 steals.

Neither team dominated every category.

Instead, Los Angeles won the categories that helped compensate for its poor three-point shooting, while Charlotte’s advantages from deep and in assists were not enough to overcome the Lakers’ overall efficiency and rebounding edge.

What Readers Should Look for in Player Stats

When researching a box score, it is easy to focus only on the highest scorer.

A better approach is to examine several categories together.

Scoring

Points identify the players who supplied the most direct offensive production.

Shooting Efficiency

Field-goal percentage helps explain how much shooting volume was required to produce those points.

Rebounding

Rebounds provide information about possession control and interior activity.

Assists

Assists show which players were creating scoring opportunities for teammates.

Turnovers

Turnovers indicate possessions that ended without a shot or successful offensive sequence.

Defensive Statistics

Steals and blocks provide additional information about defensive events that may not be visible from scoring totals.

Using all of these categories creates a more complete interpretation of player performance.

Important Statistical Takeaways

Several numbers stand above the rest when reviewing the game.

42 points: Anthony Davis’ scoring total.

23 rebounds: Davis’ rebounding total.

20 points: The Lakers’ first-quarter scoring advantage.

14 rebounds: Los Angeles’ overall rebounding advantage.

14 three-pointers: Charlotte’s total made three-pointers.

51%: Los Angeles’ field-goal percentage.

45%: Charlotte’s field-goal percentage.

8 assists: LeBron James’ team-high total.

6 assists: Austin Reaves’ total and Nick Smith Jr.’s total.

11 steals: Charlotte’s team total.

5 blocks: Los Angeles’ team total.

These figures help explain why a five-point final margin emerged despite Charlotte having clear advantages in some statistical categories.

How the Game Developed From Start to Finish

The game can be divided into three broad phases.

The opening phase belonged clearly to Los Angeles. The Lakers scored 39 points and limited Charlotte to 19.

The second phase was Charlotte’s response. The Hornets scored 32 points in the second quarter and made the game considerably closer.

The final phase became a possession-by-possession contest. The third quarter was nearly even, while Charlotte won the fourth quarter 30-26.

The Lakers therefore did not need to win every remaining quarter after their explosive opening. Their objective became protecting the lead while Charlotte attempted to erase it.

That distinction is important when evaluating the final result.

Previous and Next Matchup Context

The supplied game information lists the January 28 meeting as the previous matchup, with the Lakers winning 112-107.

The next listed matchup is February 20, where the supplied data records Charlotte defeating Los Angeles 100-97.

That later result provides useful context when studying the matchup as a series rather than looking at one game in isolation.

The January meeting showed the Lakers winning through strong overall shooting efficiency, rebounding, and Davis’ dominant production.

The later listed result demonstrates that outcomes can change between meetings and that one box score should not automatically be treated as a permanent description of either team.

Final Statistical Perspective

The January 28, 2025 meeting between Los Angeles and Charlotte was a strong example of how different statistical strengths can collide in one game.

The Lakers shot better overall, controlled the boards, and received a massive performance from Anthony Davis. Davis’ 42 points and 23 rebounds were the most obvious individual numbers in the contest.

LeBron James provided 22 points and eight assists, while Austin Reaves added 17 points and six assists. The supporting cast also contributed defensive plays and efficient shooting in important areas.

Charlotte, meanwhile, showed clear offensive resilience after the first quarter. Miles Bridges led the Hornets with 26 points, Josh Okogie added 19, and Josh Green scored 15 while shooting four-of-six from three-point range. Charlotte also made 14 three-pointers and finished with more assists and steals than Los Angeles.

Yet the early 39-19 quarter and the Lakers’ 48-34 rebounding advantage proved significant.

The most useful conclusion from the lakers vs charlotte hornets match player stats is that the five-point final margin came from a combination of factors rather than a single statistic. Los Angeles’ overall shooting efficiency and dominance on the glass helped overcome its 21% three-point shooting, while Charlotte’s strong perimeter shooting and defensive activity kept the game competitive after a difficult opening period.

For anyone studying the lakers vs charlotte hornets match player stats, the key is to look beyond the leading scorer. The complete box score reveals how scoring efficiency, rebounding, assists, turnovers, three-point shooting, and defensive plays interacted to shape the result.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Lakers vs Hornets game on January 28, 2025?

Anthony Davis led all players with 42 points for the Los Angeles Lakers. He shot 17-of-28 from the field and also collected 23 rebounds.

How many points did LeBron James score against Charlotte?

LeBron James scored 22 points. He also recorded seven rebounds and eight assists.

Who was Charlotte’s leading scorer?

Miles Bridges led Charlotte with 26 points. He also recorded eight rebounds and four assists.

What was the final score?

The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Charlotte Hornets 112-107 at Spectrum Center in Charlotte.

Which team had more rebounds?

The Lakers had 48 rebounds, while the Hornets had 34. Los Angeles therefore held a 14-rebound advantage.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Charlotte shot better from three-point range. The Hornets made 14 of 36 attempts, or approximately 39%, while the Lakers made six of 28, or approximately 21%.

Conclusion

The January 28, 2025 matchup was defined by contrasting strengths. Los Angeles established control with a 39-point opening quarter, shot 51% from the field, and dominated the rebounding battle 48-34. Anthony Davis was the central statistical figure with 42 points and 23 rebounds, while LeBron James and Austin Reaves supplied important playmaking and secondary scoring.

Charlotte responded strongly after the opening period. The Hornets scored 32 points in the second quarter and 30 in the fourth, while their 14 made three-pointers demonstrated significant perimeter efficiency. Miles Bridges led the team in scoring, while Josh Okogie and Josh Green provided valuable contributions.

The complete box score therefore presents a more detailed picture than the final 112-107 score alone. The Lakers’ interior efficiency, rebounding advantage, and explosive start balanced Charlotte’s superior three-point shooting, assists, and steals. These statistical contrasts explain how Los Angeles maintained enough separation to finish with the five-point victory.