San Antonio Spurs vs Knicks Match Player Stats
The san antonio spurs vs knicks match player stats from NBA Finals Game 2 tell the story of one of the closest games of the series. The New York Knicks defeated the San Antonio Spurs 105-104 on June 6, 2026, at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio. The one-point result came down to execution across four very different quarters, with the Knicks overcoming a strong opening from the Spurs and holding on after San Antonio produced a major fourth-quarter response.
Karl-Anthony Towns led New York with 21 points and 13 rebounds, while Mikal Bridges and Jalen Brunson each added 20 points. For San Antonio, Victor Wembanyama produced the game’s highest individual scoring total with 29 points and also collected nine rebounds and four blocks. De’Aaron Fox contributed 20 points and five assists, while Devin Vassell finished with 14 points, nine rebounds, and five assists.
The final score alone does not explain why New York won. The deeper numbers show that San Antonio actually shot a better percentage from the field, 47 percent compared with New York’s 42 percent. The Knicks, however, produced more assists, fewer turnovers, more steals, more rebounds, and a stronger overall three-point percentage. Those small advantages became important in a game decided by a single point.
San Antonio Spurs vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup was Game 2 of the NBA Finals, played at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas. The Knicks entered the contest with a 53-29 overall record and a 22-19 road record. The Spurs entered with a stronger 62-20 overall mark and an impressive 32-8 home record.
That context made the result especially significant. San Antonio had been dominant at home during the season, yet New York managed to leave San Antonio with a second consecutive Finals victory.
The Knicks won 105-104, giving them a 2-0 series advantage according to the supplied game data.
Game Information
| Category | Details |
| Game | New York Knicks vs. San Antonio Spurs |
| Date | June 6, 2026 |
| Competition | NBA Finals, Game 2 |
| Venue | Frost Bank Center, San Antonio, TX |
| Attendance | 19,014 |
| Final Score | Knicks 105, Spurs 104 |
| Series Standing | Knicks lead 2-0 |
| Broadcast | ABC |
| Game ID | 401859964 |
| Officials | Josh Tiven, Tony Brothers, Mitchell Ervin, Tyler Ford |
The game was listed with a 5:30 AM game time on June 6, 2026, in the supplied data.
How the Game Developed Quarter by Quarter
One of the most useful ways to understand the match is to look at the scoring progression rather than focusing only on the final score.
New York’s quarter totals were 25, 31, 28, and 21.
San Antonio’s quarter totals were 34, 18, 23, and 29.
This produced a dramatic contrast in momentum.
First Quarter: Spurs Take Control
San Antonio opened the game with 34 points, while New York scored 25.
A nine-point advantage after the opening period gave the Spurs early control. The 34-point first quarter also established the scoring pace that would make the final result so competitive.
Victor Wembanyama was one of the major individual forces behind San Antonio’s offensive performance throughout the game, eventually finishing with 29 points.
Second Quarter: Knicks Reverse the Momentum
The second quarter completely changed the direction of the contest.
New York scored 31 points while San Antonio managed only 18. That 13-point quarter advantage erased the Spurs’ nine-point first-quarter lead and gave the Knicks a four-point advantage at halftime.
This swing is one of the most important details in the box score.
Rather than allowing San Antonio’s fast start to dictate the rest of the game, New York responded with its most productive quarter. The Knicks’ ability to generate 31 points while holding the Spurs to 18 created the foundation for the eventual one-point victory.
Third Quarter: Knicks Maintain the Edge
New York added another 28 points in the third quarter, compared with 23 for San Antonio.
That gave the Knicks a five-point advantage in the period and allowed them to enter the fourth quarter with a nine-point lead based on the supplied quarter totals.
The game therefore moved into the final period with San Antonio needing a significant response.
Fourth Quarter: Spurs Nearly Complete the Comeback
San Antonio delivered that response.
The Spurs scored 29 points in the fourth quarter, while the Knicks scored 21. San Antonio therefore won the final period by eight points.
That comeback narrowed what had been a meaningful Knicks advantage and produced the 105-104 final score.
The fourth quarter demonstrates why the individual and team statistics need to be examined together. San Antonio had the stronger field-goal percentage for the full game, but New York had already created enough advantages in the middle portions of the contest to survive the late Spurs surge.
Knicks Player Performance
The New York box score was led by a balanced group of high-impact players rather than a single overwhelming scoring performance.
Karl-Anthony Towns was the Knicks’ leading scorer with 21 points. He also led the team in rebounding with 13 boards.
Mikal Bridges and Jalen Brunson each scored 20 points, while OG Anunoby contributed 17.
That meant four Knicks starters reached at least 17 points.
This balance matters in a Finals environment. When a team has multiple players producing meaningful scoring totals, opponents have fewer opportunities to focus their defensive attention on one primary option.
Karl-Anthony Towns
Towns delivered the most complete statistical performance for New York.
His line included:
- 21 points
- 13 rebounds
- Plus/minus of +11 among Knicks starters
The 13 rebounds were particularly important because New York finished with 44 total rebounds compared with San Antonio’s 42.
Towns’ combination of scoring and rebounding made him one of the most influential players in the game. His +11 mark also indicates that New York performed well during his minutes relative to the overall game flow.
Mikal Bridges
Bridges scored 20 points and was also one of New York’s three leading assist contributors with six assists.
That combination is important because it shows his impact was not limited to scoring. Six assists matched the team-high mark and helped the Knicks finish with 29 total assists.
Jalen Brunson
Brunson also scored 20 points and recorded six assists.
His most distinctive defensive statistic was five steals, the highest total listed for either team in the supplied data.
Five steals are significant in a one-point game because defensive plays that create turnovers can generate valuable transition opportunities without requiring a half-court possession to produce a shot.
Brunson therefore contributed across several areas:
- 20 points
- 6 assists
- 5 steals
His five steals were the highest individual steal total in the game.
OG Anunoby
Anunoby added 17 points.
While he did not lead the Knicks in any of the headline statistical categories, his scoring gave New York another reliable contributor alongside Towns, Bridges, and Brunson.
The fact that four Knicks starters scored at least 17 points is one of the clearest indicators of New York’s balanced offensive production.
Josh Hart
Hart’s scoring total was not identified among the leading scorers in the supplied data, but he tied for the team-high in assists with six.
That puts him alongside Bridges and Brunson as one of the Knicks’ principal playmaking contributors.
The six-assist total is especially notable when combined with New York’s 29 team assists. The Knicks were not dependent on one player to create every scoring opportunity.
Spurs Player Performance
San Antonio’s individual production was anchored by Victor Wembanyama.
Wembanyama scored 29 points, the highest individual total of the game. He also recorded nine rebounds and four blocks.
De’Aaron Fox scored 20 points and added five assists. Devin Vassell scored 14 points while producing nine rebounds and five assists. Stephon Castle also scored 14 points.
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama was the game’s leading scorer with 29 points.
His complete statistical contribution included:
- 29 points
- 9 rebounds
- 4 blocks
The four blocks were the highest individual total in the supplied game data.
Wembanyama’s nine rebounds also tied him with Vassell for the Spurs’ team-high in that category.
The combination of 29 points and four blocks demonstrates his influence on both ends of the court. San Antonio had a major interior defensive presence while also receiving its highest scoring output from the same player.
De’Aaron Fox
Fox scored 20 points and recorded five assists.
His five assists tied Vassell for the Spurs’ team-high.
Fox’s performance therefore combined scoring and creation. In a game where San Antonio recorded 22 total assists, his five assists represented a substantial portion of the team’s playmaking production.
Devin Vassell
Vassell recorded 14 points, nine rebounds, and five assists.
His nine rebounds tied Wembanyama for the Spurs’ team lead, while his five assists tied Fox for the team-high.
That makes Vassell one of the more statistically balanced players in the game. He contributed in scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.
Stephon Castle
Castle finished with 14 points.
His scoring matched Vassell’s total and gave San Antonio another double-digit scoring contributor alongside Wembanyama and Fox.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting numbers create one of the most interesting parts of the matchup.
The Knicks made 37 of 89 field-goal attempts, while the Spurs made 37 of 78.
Both teams therefore made exactly 37 field goals.
The difference was volume.
New York attempted 11 more field goals than San Antonio. That additional shot volume helped compensate for the Knicks’ lower field-goal percentage.
Field Goal Efficiency
| Team | FG Made | FG Attempts | FG Percentage |
| Knicks | 37 | 89 | 42% |
| Spurs | 37 | 78 | 47% |
San Antonio was more efficient from the field.
Yet efficiency did not automatically translate into victory.
This is a useful reminder when reading basketball statistics. Field-goal percentage is important, but it is only one part of the scoring equation. Possession volume, turnovers, offensive rebounds, three-point shooting, and free throws can all change how efficient shooting translates into the final score.
Three-Point Shooting
The Knicks went 15-for-38 from three-point range, while the Spurs went 11-for-29.
New York therefore made four more three-pointers.
| Team | 3PT Made | 3PT Attempts | 3PT Percentage |
| Knicks | 15 | 38 | 39% |
| Spurs | 11 | 29 | 38% |
The percentages were close, with New York holding only a one-percentage-point advantage according to the supplied data.
The more important difference was the number of made threes.
New York’s 15 made three-pointers provided four additional successful three-point shots compared with San Antonio. In a game decided by one point, that difference is highly relevant.
The Knicks also attempted nine more three-pointers than the Spurs.
That suggests a major part of New York’s offensive approach involved creating additional scoring value from beyond the arc.
Free Throw Comparison
Free throws were another area where the teams differed.
The Knicks went 16-for-21 from the free-throw line, while the Spurs went 19-for-27.
| Team | FT Made | FT Attempts | FT Percentage |
| Knicks | 16 | 21 | 76% |
| Spurs | 19 | 27 | 70% |
San Antonio attempted six more free throws and made three more.
However, the Spurs’ lower free-throw percentage reduced the benefit of those additional opportunities.
The Knicks converted 76 percent of their attempts, while San Antonio converted 70 percent.
In a one-point game, free-throw accuracy deserves attention because even a small number of missed attempts can become meaningful when the final margin is so narrow.
Rebounding Battle
The Knicks finished with 44 rebounds.
The Spurs finished with 42.
That gave New York a two-rebound advantage.
| Team | Total Rebounds |
| Knicks | 44 |
| Spurs | 42 |
The difference was not large, but it favored the winning team.
Karl-Anthony Towns led the Knicks with 13 rebounds. Wembanyama and Vassell each collected nine for San Antonio.
Rebounding is particularly important when field-goal efficiency favors the opposing team. San Antonio shot 47 percent compared with New York’s 42 percent, but the Knicks generated more total rebounds and took 11 more field-goal attempts.
That combination suggests that possession volume was an important part of the final statistical picture.
Assists and Ball Movement
New York finished with 29 assists.
San Antonio recorded 22.
That gave the Knicks a seven-assist advantage.
| Team | Assists |
| Knicks | 29 |
| Spurs | 22 |
Three Knicks players shared the team-high with six assists:
- Josh Hart
- Mikal Bridges
- Jalen Brunson
San Antonio’s assist leaders were De’Aaron Fox and Devin Vassell, with five each.
The difference in team assists is one of the strongest statistical indicators favoring New York.
The Knicks were able to distribute playmaking responsibility across several players. Instead of relying exclusively on Brunson, New York received six assists from Hart and six from Bridges as well.
That kind of distribution can make an offense more difficult to disrupt because multiple players can initiate or facilitate scoring opportunities.
Turnovers: A Critical Difference
The Knicks committed 12 turnovers.
The Spurs committed 16.
That gave New York a four-turnover advantage.
| Team | Turnovers |
| Knicks | 12 |
| Spurs | 16 |
In a one-point game, four additional turnovers are highly relevant.
San Antonio actually had the better field-goal percentage and the same number of made field goals as New York. However, the Spurs gave the ball away more often.
The Knicks also recorded 11 steals compared with seven for San Antonio.
That creates another important connection between the statistics.
New York had:
- Fewer turnovers
- More steals
- More assists
- More rebounds
- More made three-pointers
Those advantages helped offset San Antonio’s superior field-goal percentage.
Defensive Statistics
The Knicks recorded 11 steals and six blocks.
The Spurs recorded seven steals and seven blocks.
| Category | Knicks | Spurs |
| Steals | 11 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 7 |
San Antonio had the advantage in blocks, largely supported by Wembanyama’s four-block performance.
New York, however, had the stronger steal total.
The four-steal difference is notable because steals can directly disrupt offensive possessions. The Knicks also committed four fewer turnovers themselves.
That produced a clear contrast in ball security and defensive disruption.
Plus/Minus Leaders
Plus/minus is not a complete measure of individual performance, but it can provide useful context when interpreted alongside the rest of the box score.
Karl-Anthony Towns recorded a +11 mark among Knicks starters, while Jose Alvarado also recorded +11.
For San Antonio, Dylan Harper led the team with a +12.
The important point is that the highest plus/minus number belonged to a Spurs player even though San Antonio lost the game.
That demonstrates why plus/minus should not be treated as a standalone ranking of player quality.
Harper’s +12 was the best listed mark, but the Spurs still fell by one point. Towns’ +11 was attached to one of New York’s most complete performances.
Why the Knicks Won Despite Shooting Worse
At first glance, the Spurs’ 47 percent field-goal shooting compared with New York’s 42 percent might suggest San Antonio should have won.
But basketball games are determined by the combined value of many possession-level outcomes.
New York made the same number of field goals as San Antonio, 37, despite shooting at a lower percentage.
The Knicks achieved that by attempting 89 shots compared with 78 for the Spurs.
New York also made 15 three-pointers compared with San Antonio’s 11.
The Knicks had 29 assists against 22 for San Antonio.
They had 44 rebounds against 42.
They committed 12 turnovers against 16.
They recorded 11 steals against seven.
Those numbers collectively explain why the Knicks could win despite inferior overall field-goal percentage.
This is one of the most useful lessons from the game. A box score should not be read as a collection of isolated numbers. The statistics interact.
More shots can compensate for lower shooting efficiency. More made threes can compensate for a lower two-point conversion rate. Fewer turnovers can preserve possessions. More assists can indicate stronger ball movement. Rebounding can create additional opportunities.
The Knicks benefited from several of these factors at once.
The Importance of the Second Quarter
The second quarter deserves special attention because it represented the game’s largest momentum swing.
San Antonio scored 34 points in the first quarter and appeared to have control.
Then the Spurs scored only 18 in the second.
New York scored 31.
That created a 13-point quarter advantage for the Knicks.
Over the rest of the game, San Antonio fought back. The Spurs won the fourth quarter 29-21 and nearly overturned the deficit.
But the second-quarter turnaround proved decisive.
This is a good example of why quarter-by-quarter analysis can reveal information that the final box score hides. A final score of 105-104 tells us the game was close. The quarter scores explain how it became close.
The Importance of the Fourth Quarter
The fourth quarter tells a different story.
San Antonio scored 29 points.
New York scored 21.
The Spurs therefore outscored the Knicks by eight points in the final period.
Despite that strong closing effort, San Antonio could not erase the accumulated deficit.
The result highlights the value of the Knicks’ earlier offensive production. New York scored 31 in the second quarter and 28 in the third, giving the team enough cushion to withstand San Antonio’s late push.
A Closer Look at the Knicks’ Statistical Profile
The Knicks’ performance can be summarized as a balanced team effort.
Their strongest statistical advantages were:
- More total rebounds, 44 to 42.
- More assists, 29 to 22.
- Fewer turnovers, 12 to 16.
- More steals, 11 to 7.
- More made three-pointers, 15 to 11.
- Better free-throw percentage, 76 percent to 70 percent.
Their primary statistical weakness was field-goal efficiency.
The Knicks made 37 of 89 attempts for 42 percent, while San Antonio made 37 of 78 for 47 percent.
Yet the Knicks found other ways to generate enough offense.
A Closer Look at the Spurs’ Statistical Profile
San Antonio’s numbers show why the game remained competitive until the end.
The Spurs had:
- A 47 percent field-goal percentage
- 37 made field goals
- 11 made three-pointers
- 19 made free throws
- 42 rebounds
- 22 assists
- Seven steals
- Seven blocks
Wembanyama’s 29 points gave the Spurs a dominant individual scoring presence.
Fox added 20 points and five assists, while Vassell provided 14 points, nine rebounds, and five assists.
The problem was not a lack of individual production. Instead, the overall possession and ball-movement numbers favored New York in several important categories.
What the Player Stats Reveal About the Match
The san antonio spurs vs knicks match player stats reveal a matchup in which individual brilliance and team execution produced different advantages.
Wembanyama was the game’s leading scorer and one of its strongest defensive players.
Towns was New York’s leading scorer and rebounder.
Brunson combined 20 points with six assists and five steals.
Bridges combined 20 points with six assists.
Hart contributed six assists.
Vassell produced a balanced 14-point, nine-rebound, five-assist performance.
Fox added 20 points and five assists.
The numbers show that the game was not simply about which superstar scored the most. It was about how the supporting production was distributed across the rotation.
What Fans Should Look for in the Box Score
When evaluating a close NBA game, focusing only on points can lead to an incomplete conclusion.
A stronger approach is to check several categories in sequence.
1. Scoring
Start with points to identify the primary offensive contributors.
In this game, Wembanyama led all scorers with 29, while Towns led New York with 21.
2. Shooting
Next, compare field-goal, three-point, and free-throw efficiency.
San Antonio had the better field-goal percentage, but New York made more three-pointers and shot free throws at a higher percentage.
3. Rebounding
The Knicks held a two-rebound advantage.
That difference helped contribute to their greater shot volume.
4. Playmaking
New York had seven more assists than San Antonio.
That was one of the clearest team-level advantages.
5. Turnovers
The Knicks committed four fewer turnovers.
In a one-point game, possession management becomes especially important.
6. Defensive Events
New York recorded four more steals, while San Antonio recorded one more block.
This gives a more complete view of defensive activity.
What the Result Means for the Series
According to the supplied game information, the Knicks moved to a 2-0 series lead after winning both of the first two Finals games.
The next listed game was Game 3, scheduled as Spurs at Knicks on June 9, 2026.
The supplied data also lists subsequent results:
- Game 3: Spurs 115, Knicks 111
- Game 4: Spurs 106, Knicks 107
- Game 5: Knicks 90, Spurs 94
Those later results show that the series remained highly competitive after Game 2.
However, the focus of this analysis remains the June 6 matchup because that is the game represented by the detailed player and team statistics supplied here.
Complete Key Player Summary
| Player | Team | Key Performance |
| Karl-Anthony Towns | Knicks | 21 points, 13 rebounds |
| Mikal Bridges | Knicks | 20 points, 6 assists |
| Jalen Brunson | Knicks | 20 points, 6 assists, 5 steals |
| OG Anunoby | Knicks | 17 points |
| Josh Hart | Knicks | 6 assists |
| Victor Wembanyama | Spurs | 29 points, 9 rebounds, 4 blocks |
| De’Aaron Fox | Spurs | 20 points, 5 assists |
| Devin Vassell | Spurs | 14 points, 9 rebounds, 5 assists |
| Stephon Castle | Spurs | 14 points |
| Dylan Harper | Spurs | +12 plus/minus |
Team Comparison at a Glance
| Statistic | Knicks | Spurs |
| Points | 105 | 104 |
| FG | 37-89 | 37-78 |
| FG% | 42% | 47% |
| 3PT | 15-38 | 11-29 |
| 3PT% | 39% | 38% |
| FT | 16-21 | 19-27 |
| FT% | 76% | 70% |
| Rebounds | 44 | 42 |
| Assists | 29 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 12 | 16 |
| Steals | 11 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 7 |
Why This Box Score Is Worth Studying
The value of the san antonio spurs vs knicks match player stats goes beyond identifying the leading scorer.
The game provides a useful example of how a team can win without having the better field-goal percentage.
San Antonio shot 47 percent from the field, four percentage points better than New York. Yet both teams made exactly 37 field goals.
New York’s 11 additional attempts, four additional made three-pointers, seven-assist advantage, four-turnover advantage, and four-steal advantage all contributed to the final outcome.
The game also demonstrates the value of balanced scoring.
New York had four players score at least 17 points. San Antonio had Wembanyama at 29, Fox at 20, and Vassell and Castle at 14 each.
Neither team relied exclusively on one statistical category.
A Practical Method for Reading Future Match Player Stats
If you are comparing two teams after a close game, a useful method is to avoid immediately deciding which team “played better” based on the final score.
Instead, work through these questions:
Who scored efficiently?
This identifies the players who converted their opportunities most effectively.
Who controlled the glass?
Rebounding can influence the number of possessions and second-chance opportunities.
Which team protected the ball?
Turnovers can erase otherwise efficient offensive possessions.
Which team created more?
Assists provide useful context for offensive organization and distribution.
Who generated defensive events?
Steals and blocks can reveal different forms of defensive impact.
How did the game change by quarter?
A team can dominate one period and struggle badly in another.
Were the stars supported?
A strong individual performance may not be enough if the supporting cast cannot maintain production.
This method produces a more reliable interpretation than simply looking at the top scorer.
Final Assessment
The Knicks’ 105-104 victory over the Spurs was a classic example of a game where several small statistical advantages outweighed one major efficiency disadvantage.
San Antonio shot better from the field and received a huge 29-point performance from Victor Wembanyama. The Spurs also had strong contributions from De’Aaron Fox and Devin Vassell.
New York answered with balance.
Karl-Anthony Towns led the Knicks with 21 points and 13 rebounds. Mikal Bridges and Jalen Brunson each scored 20. Brunson added five steals, while Bridges and Brunson each contributed six assists. Josh Hart also had six assists.
At the team level, the Knicks recorded more rebounds, assists, and steals while committing fewer turnovers. They also made four more three-pointers and converted their free throws at a better percentage.
The quarter scores explain the timing of those advantages. San Antonio controlled the first quarter, New York dominated the second and third, and the Spurs mounted a strong fourth-quarter comeback.
Ultimately, New York had built just enough of a cushion to survive the final push.
For anyone studying the san antonio spurs vs knicks match player stats, the biggest lesson is that a one-point NBA game cannot be properly explained by scoring alone. The complete box score shows how shooting efficiency, shot volume, ball movement, possession control, rebounding, and defensive activity combined to produce the final result.
The numbers also show why player statistics are most useful when viewed in context. Wembanyama’s 29 points were outstanding, but Towns’ 21 points and 13 rebounds were part of a broader Knicks performance that produced more assists, fewer turnovers, more steals, and more total rebounds.
That balance ultimately separated the teams by one point.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Spurs vs Knicks game?
Victor Wembanyama was the game’s leading scorer with 29 points for San Antonio. Karl-Anthony Towns led the Knicks with 21 points.
Who led the Knicks in rebounds?
Karl-Anthony Towns led the Knicks with 13 rebounds. He was also the team’s top scorer with 21 points.
How many points did Jalen Brunson score?
Jalen Brunson scored 20 points. He also recorded six assists and five steals.
How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?
Victor Wembanyama scored 29 points. He also recorded nine rebounds and four blocks.
Which team shot better from the field?
The San Antonio Spurs shot better from the field, making 37 of 78 attempts for 47 percent. The Knicks made 37 of 89 attempts for 42 percent.
Why did the Knicks win despite shooting a lower field-goal percentage?
New York made more three-pointers, had more assists and rebounds, committed fewer turnovers, recorded more steals, and generated more total field-goal attempts. Those advantages helped the Knicks win 105-104.
Conclusion
The san antonio spurs vs knicks match player stats from June 6, 2026, provide a detailed picture of a tightly contested NBA Finals game.
The Spurs had the game’s highest scorer in Victor Wembanyama and the better overall field-goal percentage. San Antonio also finished with seven blocks and produced a strong fourth-quarter comeback.
The Knicks, however, created advantages in several other areas. They had 44 rebounds to San Antonio’s 42, 29 assists to 22, 11 steals to seven, and 12 turnovers compared with 16. New York also made 15 three-pointers, four more than the Spurs.
Karl-Anthony Towns stood out for New York with 21 points and 13 rebounds. Mikal Bridges and Jalen Brunson each scored 20, while Brunson added five steals. For San Antonio, Wembanyama’s 29 points, nine rebounds, and four blocks represented an outstanding individual performance.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers provide the final piece of the story. San Antonio started strongly, New York controlled the middle portion of the game, and the Spurs finished with a powerful fourth-quarter push. The Knicks ultimately had enough of an advantage from the earlier stages to win by a single point.
The result shows why detailed player statistics are essential when analyzing a close basketball game. The final score identifies the winner, but the complete box score explains how that winner earned the result.
