Las Vegas Raiders vs Texans Match Player Stats
The Las Vegas Raiders vs Texans match player stats reveal how Las Vegas recovered from a difficult opening quarter to secure a 22-20 preseason victory over the Houston Texans on August 21, 2026. The Raiders entered halftime trailing after Houston built a 17-3 first-quarter advantage, but a stronger second-half performance helped them complete an impressive comeback. Both teams showed different strengths throughout the contest, with Houston producing an early scoring surge and Las Vegas finding more consistency on the ground as the game progressed.
The preseason matchup offered an opportunity to evaluate quarterbacks, running backs, receivers, defensive players, and special teams contributors. Aidan O’Connell delivered the most productive passing performance for Las Vegas, while Mike Washington Jr. provided an important rushing contribution. For Houston, Davis Mills led the passing rotation in completions, and Woody Marks produced an efficient performance on limited carries.
The defensive statistics also deserve attention. Wade Woodaz recorded an 80-yard interception return touchdown for Houston, while the Raiders received important contributions from Patrick Johnson, Thomas Booker IV, and Devin Lafayette. These individual performances helped shape a game that remained competitive until the final result.
This breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, quarterback efficiency, rushing production, receiving contributions, defensive statistics, turnovers, kicking, and punting. It also explains what the numbers tell us about the strengths and weaknesses displayed by both teams during this preseason contest.
Las Vegas Raiders vs Texans Match Player Stats: Final Score and Game Summary
The Las Vegas Raiders defeated the Houston Texans 22-20 on August 21, 2026. Although Houston controlled the opening quarter, Las Vegas gradually improved its offensive production and finished the game with a narrow two-point victory.
Here is the overall scoreboard:
| Game Information | Details |
| Matchup | Las Vegas Raiders vs Houston Texans |
| Date | August 21, 2026 |
| Competition | NFL Preseason |
| Final Score | Raiders 22, Texans 20 |
| Winning Team | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Raiders Record | 1-1 |
| Texans Record | 0-2 |
| Raiders Away Record | 1-0 |
| Texans Home Record | 0-2 |
| Game Status | Final |
| ESPN Game ID | 401873286 |
The result demonstrated how quickly a preseason game can change. Houston established an early advantage, but the Raiders remained competitive and eventually overturned the deficit.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | Las Vegas Raiders | Houston Texans |
| First Quarter | 0 | 17 |
| Second Quarter | 3 | 3 |
| Third Quarter | 7 | 0 |
| Fourth Quarter | 12 | 0 |
| Final Score | 22 | 20 |
Houston’s 17-point opening quarter was the defining feature of the early game. The Texans entered the second quarter with a comfortable lead and appeared to have control of the contest.
However, their scoring production slowed considerably after the opening period. Houston managed only three additional points in the second quarter and failed to add to its total during the second half.
Las Vegas followed a different pattern. The Raiders started without scoring but gradually improved. Their seven-point third quarter brought them closer, while their 12-point fourth quarter completed the comeback.
The biggest statistical takeaway is the difference between the teams’ early and late performances. Houston generated its advantage quickly, whereas Las Vegas demonstrated better scoring momentum as the game developed.
How the Raiders Completed the Comeback
The Raiders’ victory was not built around one exceptional passing performance. Instead, their offensive production came from a combination of rushing contributions, short and intermediate passing plays, and defensive opportunities.
Las Vegas recorded:
- 241 passing yards.
- 159 rushing yards.
- 23 completed passes.
- Three rushing touchdowns.
- One interception thrown.
- Three defensive sacks.
The Texans recorded:
- 141 passing yards.
- 78 rushing yards.
- 21 completed passes.
- One rushing touchdown.
- One interception thrown.
- One defensive sack.
The most noticeable difference was the rushing production. Las Vegas gained 159 yards on the ground, compared with Houston’s 78 yards.
That 81-yard difference gave the Raiders an important offensive advantage. Their running game created additional opportunities to move the football without depending entirely on quarterback production.
Houston, meanwhile, produced more of its early success through its opening offensive possessions. The Texans struggled to maintain the same scoring output after the first quarter.
Quarterback Performance: Raiders vs Texans
Quarterback statistics are an important part of understanding this matchup. Both teams used multiple quarterbacks, allowing several players to receive opportunities during the preseason contest.
A preseason quarterback evaluation should consider more than passing yards. Completion percentage, yards per attempt, turnovers, sacks, and decision-making provide a more complete picture.
Las Vegas Raiders Quarterback Stats
| Quarterback | Completions/Attempts | Passing Yards | Average | TDs | INTs | Rating |
| Aidan O’Connell | 15/24 | 166 | 6.9 | 0 | 0 | 83.0 |
| Fernando Mendoza | 8/15 | 86 | 5.7 | 0 | 1 | 42.6 |
| Team Total | 23/39 | 241 | 6.5 | 0 | 1 | 67.5 |
Aidan O’Connell’s Passing Performance
Aidan O’Connell was the most productive passing quarterback for Las Vegas.
He completed 15 of 24 attempts, producing 166 passing yards. His completion percentage was 62.5%, and he averaged 6.9 yards per attempt.
His most important statistical achievement was avoiding interceptions.
O’Connell finished with:
- 15 completions.
- 24 passing attempts.
- 166 passing yards.
- 6.9 yards per attempt.
- Zero passing touchdowns.
- Zero interceptions.
- 83.0 passer rating.
- Zero sacks recorded.
O’Connell’s performance provided a relatively stable passing contribution. Although he did not throw a touchdown, his ability to complete 15 passes without an interception helped Las Vegas maintain offensive opportunities.
His 166 passing yards also represented approximately 69% of the Raiders’ reported team passing-yard total.
One important distinction is that O’Connell’s passing production should not be confused with the team’s overall offensive success. The Raiders’ three rushing touchdowns played a major role in their scoring output.
Fernando Mendoza’s Passing Performance
Fernando Mendoza completed eight of 15 passing attempts for 86 yards.
His completion percentage was approximately 53.3%, and he averaged 5.7 yards per attempt.
His statistical line included:
- Eight completions.
- 15 passing attempts.
- 86 passing yards.
- 5.7 yards per attempt.
- Zero passing touchdowns.
- One interception.
- One sack for 11 yards.
- 42.6 passer rating.
The interception was the most damaging part of Mendoza’s statistical performance.
Turnovers can be especially important in preseason contests because quarterbacks are evaluated on their ability to make good decisions under pressure. A quarterback can complete several passes and still create problems if an unnecessary turnover ends a promising possession.
Mendoza’s 86 passing yards showed that he contributed to the Raiders’ offensive production, but his interception and sack reduced the overall efficiency of his performance.
His numbers also demonstrate why completion percentage alone should not determine quarterback effectiveness.
Houston Texans Quarterback Stats
Houston used three quarterbacks during the contest. Davis Mills recorded the highest passing-yard total among them, while C.J. Stroud also received a limited opportunity.
| Quarterback | Completions/Attempts | Passing Yards | Average | TDs | INTs | Rating |
| Davis Mills | 11/15 | 93 | 6.2 | 0 | 0 | 89.0 |
| Brett Rypien | 6/10 | 44 | 4.4 | 0 | 1 | 30.8 |
| C.J. Stroud | 4/6 | 27 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 76.4 |
| Team Total | 21/31 | 141 | 5.3 | 0 | 1 | 67.1 |
Davis Mills’ Performance
Davis Mills delivered the strongest passing performance for Houston in terms of completion percentage and passer rating.
He completed 11 of 15 attempts for 93 yards.
His completion rate was approximately 73.3%, making him the most accurate quarterback in the game among players with the listed passing statistics.
His numbers included:
- 11 completions.
- 15 attempts.
- 93 passing yards.
- 6.2 yards per attempt.
- Zero passing touchdowns.
- Zero interceptions.
- One sack for seven yards.
- 89.0 passer rating.
Mills demonstrated relatively efficient short-to-intermediate passing production.
His 89.0 rating was also the highest among the four quarterbacks listed in the game statistics.
However, the absence of a passing touchdown means his performance did not directly contribute to the passing-touchdown column. Houston’s scoring production came through other offensive methods and special teams.
Brett Rypien’s Performance
Brett Rypien completed six of 10 attempts for 44 yards.
His passing average was 4.4 yards per attempt, and his passer rating finished at 30.8.
His statistical line included:
- Six completions.
- 10 attempts.
- 44 passing yards.
- 4.4 yards per attempt.
- Zero passing touchdowns.
- One interception.
- Two sacks for 16 yards.
- 30.8 passer rating.
Rypien experienced a difficult statistical outing.
His interception was particularly important because Houston finished with one team interception in the game. He also took two sacks, which reduced the efficiency of the Texans’ passing possessions.
The fumble statistics add another concern. Rypien recorded two fumbles, with one lost. Those mistakes contributed to Houston’s turnover problems.
C.J. Stroud’s Limited Appearance
C.J. Stroud completed four of six attempts for 27 yards.
His completion percentage was approximately 66.7%, and he finished with a 76.4 passer rating.
His passing statistics were:
- Four completions.
- Six attempts.
- 27 passing yards.
- 4.5 yards per attempt.
- Zero passing touchdowns.
- Zero interceptions.
- Zero sacks.
Stroud’s appearance was limited compared with the other quarterbacks.
His six attempts do not provide enough volume to make a broad judgment about his overall performance. However, the numbers show that he completed four passes without throwing an interception.
Quarterback Comparison
The quarterback comparison reveals several differences.
| Statistical Category | Raiders | Texans |
| Team Completions | 23 | 21 |
| Passing Attempts | 39 | 31 |
| Passing Yards | 241 | 141 |
| Passing Average | 6.5 | 5.3 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Team Passer Rating | 67.5 | 67.1 |
Las Vegas attempted eight more passes and gained 100 additional passing yards according to the supplied team totals.
Houston had the advantage in completion percentage, completing 21 of 31 passes, compared with the Raiders’ 23 of 39.
The comparison illustrates an important point: a higher completion percentage does not always mean a team produced more passing yards.
Las Vegas generated more total passing production, while Houston completed a higher percentage of its attempts.
Running Back Stats: Who Controlled the Ground Game?
The rushing comparison was one of the clearest statistical advantages for Las Vegas.
The Raiders finished with 159 rushing yards on 28 carries. Houston recorded 78 yards on 25 attempts.
This difference gave Las Vegas an opportunity to create offensive balance and reduce its dependence on passing plays.
Las Vegas Raiders Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | TDs | Longest Run |
| Mike Washington Jr. | 9 | 56 | 6.2 | 0 | 33 |
| Dylan Laube | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 1 | 13 |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 1 | 19 |
| Roman Hemby | 6 | 27 | 4.5 | 0 | 9 |
| Deven Thompkins | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Aidan O’Connell | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 |
| Team Total | 28 | 159 | 5.7 | 3 | 33 |
Mike Washington Jr.’s Rushing Production
Mike Washington Jr. led the Raiders in rushing yards.
He recorded nine carries for 56 yards, averaging 6.2 yards per attempt.
His longest run covered 33 yards.
Washington’s performance was important because he generated the highest individual rushing total for Las Vegas.
His nine carries also represented the largest workload among the Raiders’ listed running contributors.
The 33-yard run demonstrated his ability to create a significant gain on an individual rushing attempt.
Although he did not record a rushing touchdown, his yardage contribution helped establish the Raiders’ ground-game advantage.
Dylan Laube’s Touchdown Contribution
Dylan Laube finished with six carries for 37 yards.
He averaged 6.2 yards per carry and recorded one rushing touchdown.
His longest run was 13 yards.
Laube’s contribution was particularly valuable because he combined consistent yardage production with a touchdown.
His six attempts produced more than six yards per carry on average, giving Las Vegas another productive option in the running game.
Dare Ogunbowale’s Efficient Performance
Dare Ogunbowale delivered one of the most efficient rushing performances in the matchup.
He recorded:
- Four carries.
- 35 rushing yards.
- 8.8 yards per carry.
- One rushing touchdown.
- 19-yard longest run.
Ogunbowale averaged more rushing yards per attempt than any other Raiders player with multiple carries.
His 35 yards on only four attempts demonstrated how limited opportunities can still produce meaningful offensive value.
His rushing touchdown also contributed directly to Las Vegas’ scoring production.
Roman Hemby’s Contribution
Roman Hemby recorded six rushing attempts for 27 yards.
He averaged 4.5 yards per carry and produced a longest run of nine yards.
His contribution was useful in maintaining the Raiders’ rushing volume.
Hemby also helped on special teams, recording two kick returns for 50 yards.
That gave him another role in the game beyond traditional offensive rushing.
Houston Texans Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | TDs | Longest Run |
| Woody Marks | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 1 | 20 |
| Owen Wright | 8 | 21 | 2.6 | 0 | 9 |
| Noah Whittington | 9 | 11 | 1.2 | 0 | 8 |
| Brett Rypien | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 7 |
| Davis Mills | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Team Total | 25 | 78 | 3.1 | 1 | 20 |
Woody Marks Leads Houston’s Rushing Attack
Woody Marks led the Texans in rushing yards.
He gained 37 yards on four attempts, averaging 9.3 yards per carry.
His longest run was 20 yards, and he scored one rushing touchdown.
Marks was particularly efficient.
Despite receiving only four rushing attempts, he finished with the same rushing-yard total as Dylan Laube and more yards per carry than every other listed player in the game.
His performance showed that Houston had an effective individual rushing option, even though its overall ground game did not produce the same volume as Las Vegas.
Owen Wright’s Performance
Owen Wright recorded eight carries for 21 yards.
He averaged 2.6 yards per attempt, with a longest run of nine yards.
His workload was relatively significant, but the yardage return was limited.
The numbers suggest that Houston struggled to generate consistent rushing gains outside Marks’ more productive attempts.
Noah Whittington’s Rushing Numbers
Noah Whittington received nine rushing attempts and finished with 11 yards.
His average was 1.2 yards per carry.
Although he had the highest rushing attempt total among the listed Texans players, he produced a relatively small amount of yardage.
This was one of the most noticeable differences between individual opportunity and actual production in the matchup.
Ground Game Comparison
| Category | Raiders | Texans |
| Rushing Attempts | 28 | 25 |
| Rushing Yards | 159 | 78 |
| Average Per Carry | 5.7 | 3.1 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 3 | 1 |
| Longest Run | 33 | 20 |
The Raiders averaged 2.6 more yards per carry than Houston.
Their 159 rushing yards were more than twice the Texans’ 78-yard total.
This was a significant advantage because successful rushing plays can help maintain possession, create manageable passing situations, and provide scoring opportunities.
Receiving Stats: Top Pass Catchers From Both Teams
Receiving production provides another useful way to understand how each offense moved the football.
The Raiders recorded 23 receptions for 252 receiving yards, while Houston finished with 21 catches for 164 receiving yards.
Neither team recorded a receiving touchdown in the supplied statistics.
Las Vegas Raiders Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Targets | Longest |
| Brandon Johnson | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 3 | 33 |
| Shedrick Jackson | 2 | 36 | 18.0 | 3 | 20 |
| Jalen Nailor | 1 | 22 | 22.0 | 3 | 22 |
| Phillip Dorsett II | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 3 | Not listed |
| Ian Thomas | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 4 | Not listed |
| Malik Benson | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 3 | Not listed |
| Mike Washington Jr. | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 5 | Not listed |
| Chris Myarick | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 3 | Not listed |
| Dylan Laube | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 2 | Not listed |
| Noah Brown | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 1 | Not listed |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 1 | Not listed |
| Connor Heyward | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 2 | Not listed |
| Deven Thompkins | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 1 | Not listed |
| E.J. Williams Jr. | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 1 | Not listed |
| Roman Hemby | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | Not listed |
| Albert Okwuegbunam Jr. | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | Not listed |
| Dareke Young | 0 | 0 | Not listed | 1 | Not listed |
| Team Total | 23 | 252 | 11.0 | 36 | 33 |
Brandon Johnson Leads Raiders Receivers
Brandon Johnson finished as the Raiders’ leading receiver by yardage.
He caught two passes for 41 yards on three targets.
His average was 20.5 yards per reception, and his longest catch covered 33 yards.
Johnson’s performance demonstrated his ability to create significant gains without requiring a large number of receptions.
His two catches accounted for an important portion of the Raiders’ receiving production.
The 33-yard reception was also the longest recorded catch for Las Vegas in the supplied statistics.
Shedrick Jackson’s Contribution
Shedrick Jackson recorded two receptions for 36 yards.
He averaged 18 yards per catch and produced a longest reception of 20 yards.
His numbers placed him second among Raiders receivers in total receiving yards.
Jackson’s contribution added another productive option to the passing attack.
Jalen Nailor’s Receiving Efficiency
Jalen Nailor caught one pass for 22 yards.
His 22-yard reception was particularly efficient because he produced the yardage on a single catch.
He was targeted three times, finishing with a 22-yard average per reception.
Although his total reception count was limited, his contribution demonstrated the value of explosive passing plays.
Ian Thomas’ Three Receptions
Ian Thomas led the Raiders in receptions with three.
He produced 19 receiving yards on four targets, averaging 6.3 yards per catch.
His contribution came through a higher number of short receptions rather than one particularly long play.
This type of receiving production can be useful for moving the chains and providing quarterbacks with an accessible passing option.
Houston Texans Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Targets | Longest |
| Marlin Klein | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 4 | 17 |
| Daniel Sobkowicz | 2 | 30 | 15.0 | 3 | 22 |
| Foster Moreau | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 3 | Not listed |
| Jared Wayne | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 2 | Not listed |
| Justin Watson | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 3 | Not listed |
| Noah Whittington | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 2 | Not listed |
| Lewis Bond | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 1 | Not listed |
| Jha’Quan Jackson | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 3 | Not listed |
| Josh Kelly | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 2 | Not listed |
| Woody Marks | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 4 | Not listed |
| Owen Wright | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 1 | Not listed |
| Louis Hansen | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 2 | Not listed |
| Xavier Hutchinson | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 2 | Not listed |
| Team Total | 21 | 164 | 7.8 | 30 | 22 |
Marlin Klein’s Receiving Performance
Marlin Klein led Houston in receiving yards.
He caught three passes for 31 yards on four targets.
His average was 10.3 yards per reception, and his longest catch covered 17 yards.
Klein also tied for the highest reception total among the listed Texans receivers.
His contribution was important because Houston needed multiple players to provide receiving production after its early scoring advantage disappeared.
Daniel Sobkowicz Adds Downfield Production
Daniel Sobkowicz finished with two catches for 30 yards.
He averaged 15 yards per reception, and his longest reception was 22 yards.
His 30-yard total placed him second among Houston’s receivers.
Sobkowicz’s contribution showed that the Texans had another option capable of producing meaningful yardage through the passing game.
Foster Moreau’s Contribution
Foster Moreau recorded two receptions for 23 yards.
He averaged 11.5 yards per catch on three targets.
His production gave Houston another useful receiving option, particularly in the intermediate passing area.
Receiving Comparison
| Category | Raiders | Texans |
| Receptions | 23 | 21 |
| Receiving Yards | 252 | 164 |
| Average Per Catch | 11.0 | 7.8 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Targets | 36 | 30 |
| Longest Reception | 33 | 22 |
Las Vegas finished with 88 more receiving yards than Houston.
The Raiders also produced a higher average per reception.
However, neither team recorded a receiving touchdown.
This means the passing game contributed primarily through yardage rather than direct touchdown production.
Defensive Player Stats: Tackles, Sacks and Interceptions
Defense played a major role in the final outcome.
Both teams recorded an interception, but the Texans generated the most memorable defensive scoring play through Wade Woodaz’s interception return.
Las Vegas, meanwhile, recorded three sacks and seven tackles for loss.
Las Vegas Raiders Defensive Stats
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Other Contributions |
| Tristin McCollum | 7 | 6 | Not listed |
| Dalton Johnson | 7 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Devin Lafayette | 5 | 3 | 1 pass defended, 1 interception |
| Patrick Johnson | 4 | 3 | 1 sack, 2 tackles for loss |
| Segun Olubi | 4 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Treydan Stukes | 4 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Thomas Booker IV | 3 | Not listed | 1 sack, 2 tackles for loss, 1 QB hit |
| Buddy Johnson | 3 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Folorunso Fatukasi | 3 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Cameron McGrone | 3 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Tommy Eichenberg | 3 | Not listed | Not listed |
Raiders defensive team totals:
- 72 total tackles.
- 40 solo tackles.
- Three sacks.
- Seven tackles for loss.
- Three passes defended.
- Three quarterback hits.
- One interception.
- Zero defensive touchdowns.
Tristin McCollum’s Tackling Performance
Tristin McCollum recorded seven total tackles and six solo tackles.
His six solo tackles were particularly notable because they represented a substantial portion of his overall defensive contribution.
A solo tackle demonstrates that a defender completed the stop without sharing the tackle credit with another player.
His performance helped Las Vegas maintain defensive involvement throughout the contest.
Dalton Johnson’s Defensive Contribution
Dalton Johnson also recorded seven total tackles.
He matched McCollum for the highest tackle total among the listed Raiders defenders.
Although the supplied statistics do not provide his solo-tackle breakdown, his seven total tackles indicate consistent involvement in defensive plays.
Patrick Johnson Records a Sack
Patrick Johnson finished with four tackles, three solo tackles, and one sack.
He also recorded two tackles for loss.
His sack was an important contribution because pressure on the quarterback can disrupt offensive timing and create difficult passing situations.
The two tackles for loss added further value to his defensive performance.
Thomas Booker IV’s Impact
Thomas Booker IV recorded three tackles and one sack.
He also produced two tackles for loss and one quarterback hit.
His combination of statistics demonstrates the value of defensive-line contributions beyond traditional tackle totals.
A sack directly stops a passing play behind the line of scrimmage, while quarterback hits show that a defender successfully reached or pressured the quarterback during a play.
Booker’s numbers made him one of the more productive defensive contributors for Las Vegas.
Houston Texans Defensive Stats
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Other Contributions |
| Brandon Codrington | 7 | 4 | Not listed |
| Stephen Hall | 6 | 5 | Not listed |
| Bryce Hall | 6 | 4 | 1 pass defended |
| Jaylen Reed | 6 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Aiden Fisher | 6 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Kaevon Merriweather | 4 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Alijah Huzzie | 4 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Jake Hummel | 4 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Marte Mapu | 4 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Wade Woodaz | 2 | Not listed | 1 interception, 80-yard defensive touchdown |
Texans defensive team totals:
- 70 total tackles.
- 38 solo tackles.
- One sack.
- Two tackles for loss.
- Four passes defended.
- Five quarterback hits.
- One interception.
- One defensive touchdown.
Brandon Codrington Leads Houston in Tackles
Brandon Codrington recorded seven total tackles and four solo tackles.
He shared the highest tackle total among the listed Texans defenders.
His contribution was important in a game where Houston needed its defense to remain active after losing its early advantage.
Stephen Hall’s Defensive Performance
Stephen Hall finished with six tackles, including five solo tackles.
His five solo tackles represented a strong individual contribution.
He was one of the more active Houston defenders according to the supplied statistics.
Bryce Hall’s Contribution
Bryce Hall recorded six tackles and four solo tackles.
He also added one pass defended.
Passes defended are important because they demonstrate a defender’s ability to disrupt a completed passing opportunity, whether through positioning, coverage, or contact with the ball.
Wade Woodaz’s 80-Yard Interception Return
Wade Woodaz produced one of the most important individual defensive plays in the supplied statistics.
He recorded:
- Two total tackles.
- One interception.
- 80 interception return yards.
- One defensive touchdown.
An 80-yard interception return touchdown is a major defensive contribution.
Instead of simply stopping the opponent’s passing possession, Woodaz turned the interception into a scoring opportunity.
This type of play can significantly change the momentum of a football game.
His interception return was also the longest recorded interception return in the supplied game statistics.
Defensive Comparison
| Defensive Category | Raiders | Texans |
| Total Tackles | 72 | 70 |
| Solo Tackles | 40 | 38 |
| Sacks | 3 | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 7 | 2 |
| Passes Defended | 3 | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 3 | 5 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
The Raiders held the advantage in sacks and tackles for loss.
Houston recorded more passes defended and quarterback hits.
The teams also finished with one interception apiece.
The biggest individual defensive difference was Woodaz’s interception return touchdown, which gave Houston an important scoring contribution.
Turnovers and Fumbles: How Ball Security Influenced the Game
Turnovers are important in football because they can eliminate offensive possessions and provide opponents with additional scoring opportunities.
The supplied statistics show that both teams recorded an interception.
However, Houston also experienced a fumble loss.
Turnover Statistics
| Category | Raiders | Texans |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 1 |
| Interceptions Recorded | 1 | 1 |
| Team Fumbles | 0 | 2 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 1 | 1 |
Las Vegas avoided a lost fumble in the supplied statistics.
Houston recorded two fumbles and lost one.
Brett Rypien was responsible for two fumbles, with one lost.
Gary Smith III and James Neal III were also listed in the supplied fumble-recovery statistics.
The most important takeaway is that Houston had additional ball-security problems beyond its interception.
The Texans could not afford to lose possessions while attempting to protect their early lead.
Devin Lafayette’s Interception
Devin Lafayette recorded one interception for Las Vegas.
His interception return was listed at zero yards, meaning the defensive takeaway did not produce additional return yardage in the supplied statistics.
Even without a long return, the interception represented an important defensive stop.
Turnover Comparison and Its Meaning
The teams finished with the same number of interceptions, but their fumble totals were different.
Houston’s additional fumble loss created another turnover-related disadvantage.
In a two-point game, possession management is particularly important.
However, without complete play-by-play information, it would not be accurate to claim that one specific turnover directly determined the final result.
Special Teams Performance: Kickers and Punters
Special teams contributed to field position and scoring throughout the matchup.
The kicking statistics show that both teams had reliable field-goal production, although Las Vegas experienced difficulties with extra-point attempts.
Las Vegas Raiders Kicking Stats
| Kicker | Field Goals | Longest FG | Extra Points | Total Points |
| Matt Gay | 1/1 | 52 yards | 0/0 | 4 |
| Kansei Matsuzawa | 0/0 | Not applicable | 1/3 | 1 |
| Team Total | 1/1 | 52 yards | 1/3 | 5 |
Matt Gay successfully converted his only field-goal attempt.
His longest field goal covered 52 yards.
Kansei Matsuzawa recorded one successful extra point from three attempts.
The 1-for-3 extra-point performance was an important statistical weakness for Las Vegas.
Extra-point opportunities are valuable because they allow teams to add points following touchdowns without requiring another offensive possession.
Houston Texans Kicking Stats
| Kicker | Field Goals | Longest FG | Extra Points | Total Points |
| Ka’imi Fairbairn | 2/2 | 57 yards | 2/2 | 8 |
| Team Total | 2/2 | 57 yards | 2/2 | 8 |
Ka’imi Fairbairn delivered a reliable kicking performance.
He converted both field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts.
His longest successful field goal was 57 yards.
Houston’s perfect kicking record provided a positive special-teams contribution.
Kicking Comparison
| Category | Raiders | Texans |
| Field Goals Made | 1 | 2 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 1 | 2 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% | 100% |
| Extra Points Made | 1 | 2 |
| Extra Points Attempted | 3 | 2 |
| Total Kicking Points | 5 | 8 |
Both teams converted every field-goal attempt.
The main difference came from extra-point accuracy and the total number of successful field goals.
Houston finished with eight kicking points, while Las Vegas recorded five.
Raiders Punting Stats
AJ Cole handled the Raiders’ punting duties.
His statistics were:
- Seven punts.
- 360 total punt yards.
- 51.4 yards per punt.
- One touchback.
- Two punts inside the 20-yard line.
- Longest punt of 64 yards.
Cole averaged more than 51 yards per punt.
His 64-yard longest punt was an important field-position contribution.
The two punts inside the 20-yard line also demonstrate his ability to place the opposition in a less favorable starting position.
Texans Punting Stats
Kai Kroeger handled Houston’s punting duties.
His performance included:
- Six punts.
- 293 total punt yards.
- 48.8 yards per punt.
- Zero touchbacks.
- Four punts inside the 20-yard line.
- Longest punt of 54 yards.
Kroeger produced a lower average distance than Cole but recorded more punts inside the 20-yard line.
That distinction is important because punting performance should not be judged by distance alone.
Placement and field position can be just as important as the total number of yards.
Punting Comparison
| Category | AJ Cole | Kai Kroeger |
| Punts | 7 | 6 |
| Total Punt Yards | 360 | 293 |
| Average | 51.4 | 48.8 |
| Touchbacks | 1 | 0 |
| Inside 20 | 2 | 4 |
| Longest Punt | 64 | 54 |
Cole had the advantage in average distance and longest punt.
Kroeger produced more punts inside the 20-yard line.
Both players contributed to their respective teams’ field-position efforts.
Kick Returns and Punt Returns
Return specialists can influence a game by improving starting field position.
The supplied statistics show that both teams generated meaningful kick-return yardage.
Raiders Kick Return Stats
| Player | Returns | Return Yards | Average | Longest |
| Roman Hemby | 2 | 50 | 25.0 | 25 |
| Deven Thompkins | 1 | 23 | 23.0 | 23 |
| Team Total | 3 | 73 | 24.3 | 25 |
Roman Hemby led the Raiders in kick-return yardage with 50 yards on two returns.
He averaged 25 yards per return.
Deven Thompkins added another 23 yards on one return.
Together, the two players produced 73 kick-return yards.
Texans Kick Return Stats
| Player | Returns | Return Yards | Average | Longest |
| Treyvhon Saunders | 3 | 73 | 24.3 | 27 |
| Noah Whittington | 2 | 44 | 22.0 | 23 |
| Team Total | 5 | 117 | 23.4 | 27 |
Treyvhon Saunders led Houston’s kick-return unit.
He recorded three returns for 73 yards, averaging 24.3 yards per return.
Noah Whittington contributed 44 yards on two returns.
Houston finished with 117 kick-return yards, 44 more than Las Vegas.
Punt Return Statistics
The Raiders recorded three punt returns for 15 yards.
Deven Thompkins handled all three listed Raiders punt returns.
He averaged five yards per return, with a longest return of 12 yards.
Houston recorded four punt returns for 35 yards.
The listed Houston return contributors were:
- Brandon Codrington: One return for 19 yards.
- Jha’Quan Jackson: One return for eight yards.
- Alijah Huzzie: One return for eight yards.
- Treyvhon Saunders: One return for zero yards.
Houston finished with the advantage in total punt-return yardage.
Five Major Statistical Takeaways From the Game
The overall numbers reveal several important differences between the two teams.
1. Las Vegas Had the Clear Rushing Advantage
The Raiders recorded 159 rushing yards, while Houston managed only 78.
The difference of 81 yards was one of the biggest statistical advantages in the matchup.
Las Vegas also averaged 5.7 yards per carry compared with Houston’s 3.1.
This demonstrates that the Raiders generated more consistent production from their running game.
2. The Raiders Produced More Passing Yardage
Las Vegas finished with 241 passing yards.
Houston recorded 141.
The Raiders generated 100 additional passing yards, even though Houston had the higher team completion percentage.
This suggests that Las Vegas produced more yardage through its completed passes, while Houston’s passing output was more limited.
3. Houston Had the Most Memorable Defensive Play
Wade Woodaz’s 80-yard interception return touchdown was a major highlight.
His defensive score demonstrated Houston’s ability to create points without relying entirely on its offense.
It was also the longest interception return listed in the supplied statistics.
4. The Raiders Recorded More Defensive Sacks
Las Vegas produced three sacks compared with Houston’s one.
The Raiders also finished with seven tackles for loss, while Houston recorded two.
This gave the Raiders an advantage in disrupting offensive plays behind the line of scrimmage.
5. Houston Was More Efficient on Special Teams Kicking
Houston converted both field goals and both extra points.
Las Vegas converted one field goal and one of three extra-point attempts.
Although the Raiders won the game, Houston had the better overall kicking conversion numbers.
These differences demonstrate why a final score alone cannot explain the complete performance of both teams.
Why the Preseason Context Matters When Evaluating Player Stats
One important detail should not be overlooked: this was a preseason game.
Preseason football is different from regular-season competition because teams use these contests to evaluate players, test combinations, and assess performance in game situations.
That context changes how individual statistics should be interpreted.
Quarterback Evaluations
A quarterback who completes 70% of his passes in a limited preseason appearance may produce an encouraging performance.
However, that number alone does not establish how he would perform over a full regular-season game.
The number of attempts, quality of defensive opposition, playing time, and offensive circumstances all matter.
For example, C.J. Stroud completed four of six passes.
His 66.7% completion rate was respectable, but six attempts are not enough to establish a broad performance trend.
Similarly, O’Connell’s 166 passing yards provided a larger sample of passing production.
Running Back Evaluations
Running backs may receive different workloads during preseason contests.
Some players receive several opportunities, while others may have a limited role.
Woody Marks averaged 9.3 yards per carry on four attempts.
That is an impressive statistical average, but it should be considered alongside his relatively small number of carries.
Mike Washington Jr. recorded 56 yards on nine attempts, providing a larger sample of rushing production.
Both performances are useful, but they demonstrate different aspects of running-back evaluation.
Defensive Player Evaluations
Defensive statistics also require context.
A player with seven tackles may have been consistently involved in defensive plays.
Another player with one sack may have created a significant impact through a single important moment.
Patrick Johnson and Thomas Booker IV both recorded sacks for Las Vegas.
Wade Woodaz produced an interception return touchdown for Houston.
These contributions should be evaluated separately rather than treating tackle totals as the only measure of defensive effectiveness.
Important Statistical Notes and Data Accuracy
The figures in this article are based on the supplied ESPN box-score extraction for the August 21, 2026 matchup.
The original game record is available through the ESPN Raiders vs Texans box score.
A few distinctions are important when interpreting the supplied figures.
First, passing yards and receiving yards are different statistical categories. The Raiders’ supplied passing total is 241 yards, while their receiving total is 252 yards. These figures should be presented as reported rather than incorrectly treating them as interchangeable.
Second, passing touchdowns and rushing touchdowns are separate categories. Neither team recorded a passing touchdown in the supplied quarterback statistics. Las Vegas recorded three rushing touchdowns, while Houston recorded one.
Third, a defensive touchdown is different from an offensive touchdown. Wade Woodaz’s interception return was recorded as a Houston defensive touchdown.
Fourth, individual preseason performances should not automatically be treated as evidence of regular-season starting roles or future production. The supplied box score establishes what happened statistically in this game, not what will happen in subsequent contests.
Fifth, the supplied statistics do not include a complete play-by-play record. Therefore, individual scoring sequences, exact possession changes, and the specific sequence behind every fourth-quarter point should not be inferred from the box score alone.
These distinctions help maintain accuracy and prevent conclusions that go beyond the available evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Las Vegas Raiders vs Houston Texans game on August 21, 2026?
The Las Vegas Raiders defeated the Houston Texans 22-20 in their preseason matchup on August 21, 2026. Houston led 17-0 after the first quarter, but Las Vegas completed a comeback to secure the victory.
2. How many passing yards did Aidan O’Connell record against the Texans?
Aidan O’Connell completed 15 of 24 passing attempts for 166 yards. He averaged 6.9 yards per attempt, threw no touchdowns, and recorded zero interceptions. His passer rating was 83.0.
3. Who was the leading rusher in the Raiders vs Texans game?
Mike Washington Jr. led the Raiders with 56 rushing yards on nine carries. Woody Marks led Houston with 37 rushing yards on four carries and averaged 9.3 yards per attempt.
4. Which player recorded the most receiving yards?
Brandon Johnson led all listed receivers with 41 receiving yards for Las Vegas. He caught two passes on three targets and recorded a longest reception of 33 yards.
5. Who recorded the defensive touchdown in the game?
Houston Texans defender Wade Woodaz recorded a defensive touchdown after returning an interception 80 yards. His interception return was one of the biggest defensive contributions in the supplied game statistics.
6. How many rushing touchdowns did the Raiders score?
The Raiders recorded three rushing touchdowns. Dylan Laube and Dare Ogunbowale each recorded one rushing touchdown, while the supplied statistics also credit Aidan O’Connell with one rushing touchdown.
Conclusion
The Las Vegas Raiders secured a 22-20 preseason victory over the Houston Texans on August 21, 2026, after recovering from a difficult opening quarter. Houston started strongly with 17 first-quarter points, but its offensive production slowed as the game progressed.
The Raiders’ rushing attack was one of the biggest differences between the teams. Las Vegas produced 159 rushing yards compared with Houston’s 78, while also gaining an advantage in passing yardage.
Aidan O’Connell led the Raiders’ passing production with 166 yards and no interceptions. Mike Washington Jr. led their rushing attack with 56 yards, while Brandon Johnson topped the receiving statistics with 41 yards.
For Houston, Davis Mills delivered the highest passer rating among the listed quarterbacks, Woody Marks averaged 9.3 yards per carry, and Marlin Klein led the receiving group with 31 yards. Wade Woodaz also delivered a memorable defensive performance with an 80-yard interception return touchdown.
Defensively, the Raiders recorded three sacks and seven tackles for loss, while Houston finished with one sack and one defensive touchdown. Special teams provided another interesting contrast, as Houston converted all its listed kicking attempts while Las Vegas struggled with extra-point accuracy.
Overall, the statistical comparison shows that the Raiders benefited from stronger rushing production, greater passing yardage, and more consistent offensive output during the later stages of the game. Houston demonstrated early scoring ability and produced important defensive moments, but it could not maintain its first-quarter advantage.
The final result was a narrow Raiders victory, with the individual player statistics offering a detailed picture of how both teams contributed to the contest.
