Baltimore Ravens vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats
The Baltimore Ravens vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats from October 31, 2025, tell a much deeper story than the 28-6 final score alone. Baltimore controlled the game through an efficient passing attack, a productive rushing performance from Derrick Henry, and a defense that repeatedly prevented Miami from turning yardage into touchdowns. Lamar Jackson completed 18 of 23 passes for 204 yards and four touchdowns without throwing an interception, while Henry added 119 rushing yards on 19 carries. Miami quarterback Tua Tagovailoa moved the ball for 261 passing yards, but the Dolphins could not finish drives and ended the game without a touchdown.
Baltimore entered the matchup with a 3-5 record, including a 1-2 mark on the road, while Miami was 2-7 with a 1-3 home record. Despite the difference in passing volume, Baltimore produced the more efficient and decisive offensive performance. The Ravens scored seven points in each of the first two quarters before adding 14 points in the third. Miami scored only six points in the opening half and was shut out after halftime.
For anyone studying individual performances, this game provides an interesting example of why box-score analysis should go beyond simply counting passing yards or receptions. Miami actually finished with more completions and more total passing yards than Baltimore, yet the Ravens won comfortably because their passing plays were far more productive in the scoring areas.
Baltimore Ravens vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game finished with Baltimore ahead 28-6.
The scoring pattern was important. Baltimore scored seven points in the first quarter, seven in the second, and 14 in the third. Miami scored three points in each of the first two quarters and failed to score in either of the final two periods.
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Baltimore Ravens | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 28 |
| Miami Dolphins | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
The halftime score was 14-6, meaning the game was still within reach for Miami at the break. Baltimore then created separation in the third quarter by scoring two touchdowns while holding Miami scoreless.
That second-half contrast is one of the clearest themes in the player statistics.
Baltimore did not need an enormous amount of offensive volume. Instead, the Ravens converted their opportunities into touchdowns. Lamar Jackson’s four touchdown passes accounted for every Baltimore passing touchdown recorded in the supplied statistics.
Miami had 25 completions for 261 yards, compared with Baltimore’s 18 completions for 204 yards. On the surface, that may suggest Miami’s passing offense was more productive. The touchdown numbers show why that conclusion would be misleading.
Baltimore produced four passing touchdowns from 23 attempts. Miami produced zero touchdowns from 40 attempts and also threw one interception.
That is the difference between accumulating yards and turning possessions into points.
Lamar Jackson’s Performance
Lamar Jackson was the most influential offensive player in the matchup.
The Baltimore quarterback completed 18 of 23 attempts for 204 yards. He averaged 8.9 yards per attempt and finished with four touchdown passes and no interceptions.
His listed passer rating was 143.2, while his QBR was 93.1.
| Statistic | Lamar Jackson |
| Completions | 18 |
| Attempts | 23 |
| Completion rate | 78.3% |
| Passing yards | 204 |
| Yards per attempt | 8.9 |
| Touchdowns | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Sack yards lost | 16 |
| QBR | 93.1 |
| Passer rating | 143.2 |
Jackson’s 78.3 percent completion rate was especially notable because Baltimore was not simply using short throws to inflate his completion percentage. The Ravens averaged 8.9 yards per passing attempt.
Four touchdowns on 23 attempts also demonstrates how efficiently Baltimore finished its opportunities.
Another useful point is the absence of interceptions. Jackson avoided the major turnover mistake through the air while still producing four touchdown passes. That combination gave Baltimore an enormous advantage in passing efficiency.
He was also involved in the rushing game, recording five carries for 14 yards. Although those numbers were modest compared with Henry’s production, Jackson’s ability to contribute as a runner added another dimension to Baltimore’s offense.
The supplied statistics show that Jackson was sacked twice for a total loss of 16 yards. Even with those negative plays, Baltimore’s passing attack remained highly efficient.
Derrick Henry Controls the Ground Game
Derrick Henry delivered the game’s most important rushing performance.
Henry carried the ball 19 times for 119 yards, averaging 6.3 yards per carry. His longest run covered 35 yards.
| Statistic | Derrick Henry |
| Carries | 19 |
| Rushing yards | 119 |
| Average | 6.3 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest run | 35 yards |
Henry’s 119 rushing yards represented the majority of Baltimore’s 150 team rushing yards.
Baltimore finished with 31 rushing attempts for 150 yards, an average of 4.8 yards per carry. The team did not need a rushing touchdown because Jackson’s four touchdown passes supplied the scoring production.
Henry’s 35-yard long run was particularly significant because it demonstrates the explosive element that remained available to Baltimore even when the Ravens were not relying entirely on short gains.
The rest of Baltimore’s rushing production came from several players:
- Lamar Jackson: 5 carries, 14 yards
- Keaton Mitchell: 4 carries, 11 yards
- Mark Andrews: 2 carries, 4 yards
- Justice Hill: 1 carry, 2 yards
This distribution shows a clear lead-back structure. Henry handled 19 of Baltimore’s 31 rushing attempts, accounting for more than half of the team’s rushing attempts.
His 119 yards also represented 79.3 percent of Baltimore’s rushing yardage.
That level of production helped Baltimore maintain balance. Miami could not focus exclusively on stopping Jackson’s passing attack because Henry remained capable of producing efficient runs.
Baltimore Receiving Leaders
Zay Flowers led Baltimore in receptions and receiving yards.
Flowers caught five passes for 64 yards on five targets. His average was 12.8 yards per reception, and his longest reception went for 39 yards.
| Baltimore Receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Zay Flowers | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 0 | 5 |
| Isaiah Likely | 3 | 60 | 20.0 | 0 | Not listed |
| Charlie Kolar | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 1 | Not listed |
| Mark Andrews | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 2 | Not listed |
| Rashod Bateman | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 1 | Not listed |
| Justice Hill | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | Not listed |
| Keaton Mitchell | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | Not listed |
| Derrick Henry | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | Not listed |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | Not listed |
Flowers’ role was particularly interesting because he led the team in receiving yards without scoring a touchdown.
Isaiah Likely produced 60 yards on only three receptions, according to the supplied data. That works out to 20 yards per reception, giving him one of Baltimore’s most explosive receiving averages.
The touchdown distribution was highly concentrated among the tight ends and receivers.
Mark Andrews caught two passes for 22 yards and scored two touchdowns. Rashod Bateman added one touchdown on two receptions, while Charlie Kolar scored another touchdown.
That means Baltimore’s four passing touchdowns were distributed between Andrews, Kolar, and Bateman.
The receiving numbers therefore show two different forms of contribution. Flowers provided volume and yardage, while other Baltimore pass catchers were particularly effective when the offense reached scoring situations.
Mark Andrews Makes the Most of His Opportunities
Mark Andrews recorded only two receptions, but both catches were highly valuable.
He finished with 22 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
A player does not need a large reception total to have a major statistical impact when his opportunities come in the red zone. Andrews’ two touchdowns demonstrate exactly that.
His production is also important when evaluating Jackson’s four touchdown passes. Baltimore did not rely on one receiver for all of its scoring production. Instead, Jackson distributed touchdown opportunities across multiple targets.
That made the passing attack difficult to summarize using receiving yardage alone.
Miami Dolphins Passing Performance
Tua Tagovailoa finished with 25 completions on 40 attempts for 261 yards.
He averaged 6.5 yards per attempt and finished with no touchdown passes and one interception.
His listed QBR was 24.1 and his passer rating was 70.9.
| Statistic | Tua Tagovailoa |
| Completions | 25 |
| Attempts | 40 |
| Completion rate | 62.5% |
| Passing yards | 261 |
| Yards per attempt | 6.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Sack yards lost | 16 |
| QBR | 24.1 |
| Passer rating | 70.9 |
The biggest problem for Miami was not a lack of passing volume.
Tagovailoa attempted 17 more passes than Jackson and completed seven more passes. He also threw for 57 more yards.
Yet Baltimore scored four passing touchdowns while Miami scored none.
That contrast illustrates why completion totals and passing yards should always be viewed alongside touchdowns, interceptions, yards per attempt, and overall game outcome.
Miami moved the ball, but the Dolphins struggled to turn those yards into points.
The 70.9 passer rating was considerably lower than Jackson’s 143.2 rating. The QBR gap was also substantial, with Jackson listed at 93.1 compared with Tagovailoa’s 24.1.
Jaylen Waddle Leads Miami’s Receivers
Jaylen Waddle was Miami’s leading receiver by yardage.
He caught six passes for 82 yards on nine targets. His average was 13.7 yards per reception, and his longest reception covered 24 yards.
| Miami Receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Jaylen Waddle | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 0 |
| Greg Dulcich | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 0 |
| Malik Washington | 3 | 48 | 16.0 | 0 |
| De’Von Achane | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 0 |
| Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 |
| Tahj Washington | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
| Cedrick Wilson Jr. | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Ollie Gordon II | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Dee Eskridge | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Tanner Conner | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Waddle’s six catches and 82 yards gave him the strongest receiving production for Miami.
However, he did not score a touchdown.
The same was true for every Miami receiver listed in the supplied statistics. The Dolphins finished with 25 receptions for 261 yards, but zero receiving touchdowns.
That statistic is perhaps the clearest summary of Miami’s offensive difficulty.
The Dolphins had enough passing production to generate a respectable yardage total. What they lacked was the finishing ability that Baltimore displayed.
De’Von Achane’s Rushing Contribution
De’Von Achane led Miami in rushing.
He carried the ball 14 times for 67 yards, averaging 4.8 yards per carry. His longest run was 22 yards.
| Statistic | De’Von Achane |
| Carries | 14 |
| Rushing yards | 67 |
| Average | 4.8 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest run | 22 yards |
Miami finished with 20 rushing attempts for 87 yards, averaging 4.4 yards per carry.
Other Miami rushing contributors included Malik Washington with 13 yards on three carries, Ollie Gordon II with six yards on two carries, and Tagovailoa with one yard on one attempt.
The overall rushing difference was meaningful.
Baltimore produced 150 rushing yards, while Miami produced 87. That gave the Ravens a 63-yard advantage on the ground.
More importantly, Baltimore’s running game helped support its passing efficiency. The Ravens could combine Henry’s workload with Jackson’s passing ability, forcing Miami to defend multiple offensive threats.
Baltimore’s Defensive Performance
Baltimore’s defense recorded 66 total tackles, including 41 solo tackles.
The unit also recorded two sacks, three tackles for loss, four passes defended, and five quarterback hits.
Roquan Smith led Baltimore with 12 tackles, including nine solo tackles.
| Baltimore Defensive Statistic | Total |
| Total tackles | 66 |
| Solo tackles | 41 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for loss | 3 |
| Passes defended | 4 |
| QB hits | 5 |
Malaki Starks recorded Baltimore’s only interception, returning it nine yards.
That turnover mattered because Miami’s offense already had difficulty producing touchdowns. A defensive interception created another obstacle for the Dolphins and helped Baltimore protect its advantage.
Marlon Humphrey and Alohi Gilman each recorded a fumble recovery for Baltimore.
The Ravens finished with two team fumble recoveries and no fumbles lost according to the supplied data.
This turnover profile is another area where Baltimore held the advantage.
Miami’s Defensive Statistics
Miami’s defense recorded 70 total tackles, which was actually four more than Baltimore.
The Dolphins registered 36 solo tackles, two sacks, five tackles for loss, one pass defended, and four quarterback hits.
Dante Trader Jr. led Miami with 13 tackles, including eight solo tackles.
| Miami Defensive Statistic | Total |
| Total tackles | 70 |
| Solo tackles | 36 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for loss | 5 |
| Passes defended | 1 |
| QB hits | 4 |
These numbers provide an important reminder that tackle totals do not automatically indicate defensive success.
Miami recorded more total tackles than Baltimore, but the Ravens scored 28 points and Miami scored only six.
A defense can accumulate tackles simply because opponents are completing plays. The more useful question is whether those defensive plays prevent first downs, create turnovers, stop scoring opportunities, or force inefficient possessions.
In this game, Baltimore’s defense did enough to keep Miami out of the end zone.
Turnovers and Hidden Game-Changers
Turnovers were one of the most important differences.
Baltimore recorded one interception and two fumble recoveries while losing no fumbles.
Miami recorded two fumbles and lost both. The players listed with Miami’s fumbles were Tahj Washington and Malik Washington.
| Turnover Statistic | Baltimore | Miami |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles | 0 | 2 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 2 |
| Fumble recoveries | 2 | Not listed |
| Defensive interceptions | 1 | 0 |
This gave Baltimore a much cleaner turnover profile.
Jackson did not throw an interception, while Tagovailoa threw one. Miami also lost two fumbles.
When a team is already struggling to score touchdowns, giving the opponent additional possessions can be especially damaging.
The turnover story also helps explain why Miami’s 261 passing yards did not translate into a competitive final score.
Special Teams Comparison
Special teams played a supporting role in the final result.
Baltimore’s Tyler Loop converted all four extra-point attempts and finished with four points.
Miami’s Riley Patterson made two of three field-goal attempts, with a long of 49 yards, and scored six points.
| Special Teams Statistic | Baltimore | Miami |
| Extra points | 4/4 | 0/0 |
| Field goals | 0/0 | 2/3 |
| Kicking points | 4 | 6 |
| Long field goal | Not applicable | 49 yards |
Baltimore’s Jordan Stout punted six times for 336 yards, averaging 56.0 yards per punt. He recorded four punts inside the 20 and had a long of 64 yards.
Miami’s Jake Bailey punted three times for 128 yards, averaging 42.7 yards, with one punt inside the 20.
The Ravens also received solid kick-return production. Rasheen Ali returned two kicks for 53 yards, while Keaton Mitchell had one return for 24 yards.
Miami’s Dee Eskridge returned four kicks for 89 yards.
On punt returns, LaJohntay Wester gave Baltimore 17 yards on one return, while Malik Washington recorded 38 yards on two Miami punt returns.
Team Efficiency Tells the Real Story
One of the most useful ways to interpret this matchup is to compare the teams across several statistical categories instead of focusing on one number.
| Category | Baltimore | Miami |
| Final score | 28 | 6 |
| Passing yards | 204 | 261 |
| Passing TDs | 4 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Rushing yards | 150 | 87 |
| Rushing attempts | 31 | 20 |
| Receiving yards | 204 | 261 |
| Receiving TDs | 4 | 0 |
| Team tackles | 66 | 70 |
| Sacks | 2 | 2 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 2 |
The most striking contrast is that Miami gained more passing and receiving yards, yet Baltimore won by 22 points.
Why?
Because Baltimore was dramatically more efficient with its opportunities.
The Ravens converted passing production into touchdowns. Miami did not.
Baltimore also ran for 63 more yards and protected the football better.
This is why a good player-stat analysis should not treat yardage as the final measure of performance.
Why Lamar Jackson’s Efficiency Mattered More Than Volume
Jackson’s 23 passing attempts compared with Tagovailoa’s 40 attempts is one of the most revealing numbers in the matchup.
Jackson needed only 23 attempts to produce 204 yards and four touchdowns.
Tagovailoa needed 40 attempts to produce 261 yards and zero touchdowns.
Jackson therefore generated substantially more scoring production with much less passing volume.
His 8.9 yards per attempt was also higher than Tagovailoa’s 6.5.
The difference between those two figures is not enormous by itself, but combined with the touchdown and interception numbers, it becomes significant.
Jackson’s passing performance was efficient, aggressive, and highly productive in terms of scoring.
Tagovailoa’s performance was higher-volume but less effective in the areas that decide games.
Why Derrick Henry Was So Important
Henry’s 119 rushing yards gave Baltimore a dependable source of offensive production.
The Ravens did not need to throw on every down.
With Henry averaging 6.3 yards per carry, Baltimore could keep Miami’s defense honest and maintain a credible rushing threat.
The 35-yard longest run also shows that Henry was capable of producing explosive plays rather than merely grinding out short gains.
His 19 carries were more than half of Baltimore’s 31 rushing attempts.
That workload helped establish a strong offensive foundation around Jackson.
The Biggest Difference in the Receiving Numbers
The receiving statistics show a similar contrast.
Miami had 37 targets and 25 receptions for 261 yards.
Baltimore had 23 targets and 18 receptions for 204 yards.
Miami therefore had 14 more targets and seven more receptions.
Yet Baltimore scored four receiving touchdowns, while Miami scored none.
This is perhaps the clearest example of why target and reception volume cannot be separated from scoring efficiency.
Miami’s receivers moved the ball.
Baltimore’s receivers moved the ball and finished drives.
Zay Flowers was Baltimore’s leading receiver by both receptions and receiving yards, while Jaylen Waddle was Miami’s leader by receiving yards.
But the most consequential receiving production came from Baltimore’s touchdown scorers.
What the Defensive Numbers Reveal
Both teams recorded two sacks.
That makes sacks alone an ineffective explanation for the final result.
Baltimore recorded five quarterback hits compared with Miami’s four, while Miami had five tackles for loss compared with Baltimore’s three.
Miami also recorded more total tackles.
Yet Baltimore’s defense produced the more meaningful outcome because it kept Miami out of the end zone throughout the entire second half.
The Ravens also forced one interception and benefited from two Miami fumbles being lost.
The combination of pressure, takeaways, and red-zone resistance mattered more than raw tackle totals.
Baltimore Ravens vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
Several conclusions stand out from the numbers.
Lamar Jackson was the most efficient passer
He completed 18 of 23 passes for 204 yards, four touchdowns, and no interceptions.
Derrick Henry dominated Baltimore’s rushing production
His 119 yards represented nearly 80 percent of Baltimore’s total rushing yardage.
Jaylen Waddle led Miami’s receiving attack
He finished with six receptions for 82 yards and nine targets.
Miami moved the ball but struggled to score
The Dolphins produced 261 passing yards and 87 rushing yards but scored only six points.
Baltimore protected the football
The Ravens lost no fumbles and Jackson threw no interceptions.
Miami’s turnovers were costly
The Dolphins lost two fumbles and threw one interception.
Baltimore’s touchdown efficiency decided the game
The Ravens scored four passing touchdowns despite attempting only 23 passes.
How to Read Player Stats From This Game
If you are comparing individual performances, it helps to use a consistent framework.
Start with volume.
Look at attempts, carries, receptions, and targets.
Then examine efficiency.
For quarterbacks, yards per attempt, completion rate, touchdowns, interceptions, sacks, QBR, and passer rating provide useful context.
For running backs, carries, yards per carry, rushing touchdowns, and long runs help explain production.
For receivers, receptions, receiving yards, yards per reception, targets, and touchdowns should be viewed together.
Finally, consider game impact.
A receiver with 80 yards and no touchdowns may have produced more yardage than a receiver with 25 yards and two touchdowns, but their statistical roles were different.
This game demonstrates that distinction particularly well.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the best player in the Ravens vs Dolphins game?
Lamar Jackson was the most statistically influential player. He completed 18 of 23 passes for 204 yards and four touchdowns with no interceptions, producing a 143.2 passer rating.
How many passing touchdowns did Lamar Jackson throw?
Lamar Jackson threw four touchdown passes against Miami. He completed 18 of 23 attempts for 204 yards.
How many rushing yards did Derrick Henry have?
Derrick Henry rushed for 119 yards on 19 carries, averaging 6.3 yards per carry. His longest run was 35 yards.
Who led the Dolphins in receiving?
Jaylen Waddle led Miami with six receptions for 82 yards on nine targets. He averaged 13.7 yards per reception and did not score a touchdown.
Did Tua Tagovailoa throw a touchdown?
No. Tagovailoa completed 25 of 40 passes for 261 yards but threw zero touchdowns and one interception.
What was the final score?
Baltimore defeated Miami 28-6. The Ravens scored 14 points in the first half and another 14 in the third quarter, while Miami scored three points in each of the first two quarters and was shut out in the second half.
Conclusion
The Baltimore Ravens vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats provide a clear example of why football performance cannot be judged by yardage totals alone.
Miami finished with more passing yards, more completions, more receiving yards, and more total tackles. Baltimore still won comfortably because the Ravens were much more effective in the categories that directly influenced the scoreboard.
Lamar Jackson’s four touchdown passes were the centerpiece of Baltimore’s offensive performance. He combined a 78.3 percent completion rate with 8.9 yards per attempt and no interceptions.
Derrick Henry added 119 rushing yards on 19 carries, giving Baltimore a powerful ground-game component.
Zay Flowers led the Ravens in receptions and receiving yards, while Mark Andrews, Charlie Kolar, and Rashod Bateman accounted for the team’s receiving touchdowns.
For Miami, Jaylen Waddle led the receiving group with 82 yards, while De’Von Achane produced 67 rushing yards. Tua Tagovailoa accumulated 261 passing yards but was unable to produce a touchdown and threw one interception.
The defensive statistics also tell an important story. Both teams recorded two sacks, and Miami actually finished with more total tackles. Baltimore, however, created the more valuable outcomes by intercepting Tagovailoa, recovering two fumbles, and preventing Miami from scoring after halftime.
Ultimately, the defining statistical theme was efficiency.
Baltimore turned limited passing volume into four touchdowns, supported that attack with 150 rushing yards, and avoided costly turnovers. Miami generated respectable yardage but could not convert its opportunities into touchdowns.
That distinction is the most useful lesson from the game. A complete player-stat analysis should always connect individual numbers to efficiency, turnovers, scoring production, and the way those elements shaped the final result.
One Comment