Seahawks vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

The seahawks vs washington commanders match player stats from NFL Week 3 tell the story of a game where elite passing production, explosive receiving, defensive pressure, and costly turnovers all collided. The Washington Commanders defeated the Seattle Seahawks 33-31 on September 27, 2026, in a tightly contested game that produced more than 600 combined passing yards and multiple momentum swings.

Seattle quarterback Sam Darnold delivered one of the most productive passing performances of the afternoon, completing 31 of 45 attempts for 379 yards and four touchdowns. Yet Washington came away with the victory because its defense created two interceptions, including a 50-yard pick-six by Kain Medrano. Marcus Mariota was considerably less productive through the air, but he avoided interceptions and helped Washington convert enough scoring opportunities to stay ahead.

For readers looking beyond the final score, the detailed numbers explain why this game was so close. Seattle generated 393 passing yards but only 44 rushing yards. Washington managed 176 passing yards and 82 rushing yards, while its defense created the turnovers that ultimately changed the game.

The following breakdown examines the most important player statistics, offensive production, defensive contributions, special teams numbers, and the statistical lessons from the matchup.

Seahawks vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

The basic scoreboard gives Washington a 33-31 victory, but the box score reveals a much more unusual statistical profile.

Category	Seattle Seahawks	Washington Commanders
Final Score	31	33
Record After Game	2-1	1-2
Passing Yards	393	176
Rushing Yards	44	82
Passing TDs	4	3
Interceptions Thrown	2	0
Team Sacks Allowed	0	2
Receiving Yards	393	183
Defensive Interceptions	0	2
Defensive TDs	0	1
Field Goals	1/1	2/2
Extra Points	4/4	3/4

Seattle produced substantially more passing yardage, while Washington gained a clear advantage in turnovers, rushing production, defensive takeaways, and field-goal output.

That combination explains how Washington won despite being outgained through the air.

The official NFL game center records the Week 3 matchup as a 33-31 Washington victory. NFL Game Center: Seahawks at Commanders

Sam Darnold’s 379-Yard Passing Performance

Sam Darnold was the central figure in Seattle’s offensive production.

He completed 31 of 45 passes for 379 yards, averaging 8.4 yards per attempt. He threw four touchdown passes and two interceptions. His passer rating was 105.7, while his listed QBR was 50.4.

Those numbers create an interesting contrast.

From a conventional passing perspective, Darnold was highly productive. His 379 yards accounted for almost all of Seattle’s 393 passing yards. He also threw four touchdown passes, which gave Seattle more than enough offensive production to remain within one score throughout the game.

However, the two interceptions were costly because Washington turned one of them directly into a touchdown.

Darnold’s statistical line:

• Completions: 31
• Attempts: 45
• Completion rate: 68.9%
• Passing yards: 379
• Yards per attempt: 8.4
• Passing touchdowns: 4
• Interceptions: 2
• Sacks: 0
• Passer rating: 105.7
• Rushing attempts: 1
• Rushing yards: 5

The absence of sacks is another notable part of the performance. Washington did not record a sack against Darnold, despite generating six quarterback hits.

That distinction matters. Seattle’s offensive line generally kept Darnold upright, allowing him enough time to distribute the ball downfield. Washington’s defense instead relied on coverage, pressure, and turnovers to disrupt the passing game.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba Leads Seattle’s Receiving Attack

Jaxon Smith-Njigba was the standout receiver in the matchup.

He finished with 10 receptions for 128 yards and two touchdowns on 14 targets. His average gain was 12.8 yards per reception, with a long reception of 26 yards.

His production was particularly important because Seattle struggled to run the football.

When a team gains only 44 rushing yards, the passing game must carry a larger share of the offensive burden. Smith-Njigba did exactly that.

His final receiving line:

• Receptions: 10
• Targets: 14
• Receiving yards: 128
• Average: 12.8 yards
• Touchdowns: 2
• Long: 26 yards

Smith-Njigba accounted for nearly one-third of Seattle’s receiving yardage.

His two touchdowns also provided important scoring efficiency. Instead of simply collecting short completions, he turned a significant portion of his opportunities into high-value production.

The supplied game data also show that he completed one pass for 14 yards on his only passing attempt. That trick-play contribution adds another unusual detail to an already statistically unusual game.

AJ Barner Provides a Significant Secondary Contribution

AJ Barner was another important part of Seattle’s passing attack.

He caught five passes for 69 yards on nine targets. His average was 13.8 yards per reception, and his longest catch traveled 32 yards.

Barner’s production helped prevent Washington from focusing exclusively on Smith-Njigba.

His 69 yards represented the second-highest receiving total for Seattle, and the 32-yard reception was the longest individual catch listed among Seattle’s primary receivers.

The distribution also demonstrates that Seattle’s passing offense was not based entirely on one player. Several contributors generated meaningful yardage.

Seattle’s Other Receiving Contributors

Seattle received additional production from several players:

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	TD	Targets
Jaxon Smith-Njigba	10	128	12.8	2	14
AJ Barner	5	69	13.8	0	9
Tory Horton	3	48	16.0	0	3
George Holani	5	48	9.6	0	5
Cooper Kupp	4	46	11.5	1	5
Brady Russell	1	20	20.0	0	1
Rashid Shaheed	2	14	7.0	0	3
Eric Saubert	1	13	13.0	1	2
Jadarian Price	1	7	7.0	0	3

Tory Horton averaged 16 yards per reception, while Brady Russell recorded a 20-yard catch on his only target.

Cooper Kupp added four catches for 46 yards and a touchdown, giving Seattle another reliable scoring option.

Eric Saubert also found the end zone on his lone reception.

This distribution is important because Seattle did not lack passing options. The bigger issue was the contrast between the efficiency of the passing attack and the lack of rushing production.

Seattle’s Running Game Struggles

The Seattle rushing statistics were one of the clearest weaknesses in the box score.

The team recorded only 18 rushing attempts for 44 yards, an average of 2.4 yards per carry.

No Seattle runner reached 20 rushing yards.

The leading rushing totals were:

• Jadarian Price: 5 carries, 15 yards
• Emanuel Wilson: 9 carries, 14 yards
• George Holani: 3 carries, 10 yards
• Sam Darnold: 1 carry, 5 yards

Seattle’s longest rushing play was only 11 yards.

That creates an obvious statistical imbalance. Seattle passed for 393 yards but rushed for just 44. The offense therefore depended heavily on Darnold and the receiving corps.

A pass-heavy offense can still win games, but it becomes more vulnerable when turnovers occur. Seattle’s two interceptions became particularly damaging because the rushing game was not producing enough consistent yardage to create an alternative path to sustained drives.

Washington’s Passing Numbers Were Much More Modest

Marcus Mariota completed 19 of 31 passes for 183 yards according to the individual passing statistics supplied for the game.

His listed line includes:

• Completions: 19
• Attempts: 31
• Passing yards: 183
• Average: 5.9 yards per attempt
• Passing touchdowns: 3
• Interceptions: 0
• Sacks: 2
• Sack yardage: 7
• QBR: 61.2
• Passer rating: 110.0

The Washington passing attack did not approach Seattle’s yardage total.

That did not prevent Washington from scoring 33 points.

Mariota’s biggest statistical advantage was ball security. He threw no interceptions.

That distinction became especially important because Seattle finished the afternoon with two interceptions thrown.

The game therefore demonstrates why passing yardage and passing efficiency cannot be examined in isolation.

Seattle produced far more passing yards, but Washington protected the football better.

Terry McLaurin Leads Washington’s Receivers

Terry McLaurin was Washington’s leading receiver.

He caught six passes for 77 yards and one touchdown on nine targets. His average was 12.8 yards per catch, with a long reception of 30 yards.

McLaurin was responsible for more than 40 percent of Washington’s receiving yardage.

His final line:

• Receptions: 6
• Targets: 9
• Yards: 77
• Average: 12.8
• Touchdowns: 1
• Long: 30

That production made him the primary downfield receiving threat in Washington’s passing game.

Washington’s Receiving Distribution

Washington’s passing game was spread across several players.

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	TD	Targets
Terry McLaurin	6	77	12.8	1	9
Stefon Diggs	4	33	8.3	0	7
Jaylin Lane	1	21	21.0	0	1
Antonio Williams	2	15	7.5	0	4
Treylon Burks	2	13	6.5	1	2
John Bates	1	9	9.0	0	1
Jacory Croskey-Merritt	1	7	7.0	0	1
Rachaad White	1	6	6.0	1	1
Colson Yankoff	1	2	2.0	0	2

McLaurin was the clear leader, but Washington also received touchdowns from Treylon Burks and Rachaad White.

The distribution helped Washington remain difficult to defend inside the scoring area even without generating huge passing totals.

Washington’s Running Game Adds Balance

Washington rushed 32 times for 82 yards, averaging 2.6 yards per carry.

That average was not especially high, but the Commanders still nearly doubled Seattle’s rushing output.

Jacory Croskey-Merritt led the team with 19 carries for 36 yards.

Rachaad White produced 35 yards on eight carries, averaging 4.4 yards per attempt. His longest run covered 19 yards.

Marcus Mariota added 11 yards on five carries.

The rushing breakdown:

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	Long	TD
Jacory Croskey-Merritt	19	36	1.9	9	0
Rachaad White	8	35	4.4	19	0
Marcus Mariota	5	11	2.2	9	0
Washington Team	32	82	2.6	19	0

The important point is not that Washington dominated on the ground. It did not.

Instead, Washington maintained more balance than Seattle.

That balance can matter in close games because it allows an offense to vary its play selection and avoid putting every possession on the quarterback’s arm.

The Turnover Battle Explains the Result

The most important statistical story of the game was the turnover margin.

Seattle committed two turnovers through interceptions.

Washington committed none.

The Commanders also converted one interception into a touchdown.

Kain Medrano intercepted Darnold and returned the ball 50 yards for a touchdown. Sonny Styles recorded Washington’s other interception, returning it for minus one yard.

Washington’s defensive turnover statistics were:

• Kain Medrano: 1 interception, 50 return yards, 1 touchdown
• Sonny Styles: 1 interception, minus 1 return yard
• Team: 2 interceptions, 49 return yards, 1 touchdown

Seattle had no interceptions.

The importance of the Medrano return cannot be overstated from a scoring perspective. A defensive touchdown produces points without requiring the offense to construct a drive.

That is one reason a team can lose the yardage battle and still win the scoreboard.

Seattle Defense: Leonard Williams and Derick Hall Create Pressure

Seattle’s defense generated two sacks and nine quarterback hits.

Leonard Williams recorded one sack, two tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits.

Derick Hall also recorded one sack, one tackle for loss, and two quarterback hits.

DeMarcus Lawrence added three quarterback hits and one tackle for loss.

Byron Murphy II contributed one quarterback hit.

Seattle’s defensive leaders included:

Player	Total Tackles	Solo	Sacks	TFL	QB Hits
Drake Thomas	9	5	0	1	0
Ernest Jones IV	8	3	0	0	0
Byron Murphy II	7	2	0	0	1
Jarran Reed	7	0	0	0	0
Devon Witherspoon	6	5	0	0	0
Josh Jobe	6	4	0	0	0
DeMarcus Lawrence	5	2	0	1	3
Derick Hall	4	2	1	1	2
Leonard Williams	3	2	1	2	3

Drake Thomas led Seattle with nine total tackles, while Ernest Jones IV followed with eight.

Seattle’s defense did generate pressure, but it did not create an interception.

That became a major difference between the two teams.

Washington’s Defense Produces the Game’s Defining Plays

Washington’s defense finished with 65 total tackles, 40 solo tackles, three tackles for loss, 10 passes defended, six quarterback hits, and two interceptions.

The standout statistical performers included Kain Medrano, Jeremy Reaves, Amik Robertson, Quan Martin, Sonny Styles, Joshua Josephs, and Odafe Oweh.

Kain Medrano’s performance was particularly significant because his interception became a touchdown.

Amik Robertson led Washington with four passes defended, while Sonny Styles recorded two passes defended and an interception.

The defensive table:

Player	Total Tackles	Solo	INT	PD	QB Hits
Jeremy Reaves	7	5	0	1	0
Amik Robertson	6	4	0	4	0
Quan Martin	5	4	0	0	0
Sonny Styles	5	4	1	2	1
Kain Medrano	5	3	1	1	1
Joshua Josephs	5	2	0	0	0
Odafe Oweh	5	0	0	0	2
Percy Butler	4	3	0	0	0
Rasul Douglas	3	3	0	1	0

Washington did not record a sack, but the defense compensated with six quarterback hits and two interceptions.

That is an important distinction.

Pressure does not always have to end in a sack to affect a game. Defenders can disrupt timing, force hurried decisions, narrow throwing windows, and create opportunities for coverage players to make plays.

Special Teams Also Played a Role

Seattle kicker Jason Myers converted his only field-goal attempt, a 57-yard kick, and made all four extra points for seven total points.

Washington kicker Drew Stevens made two field goals, including a 57-yard attempt, and converted three of four extra points for nine total points.

The kicking totals:

Kicker	FG	FG %	Long	XP	Points
Jason Myers	1/1	100%	57	4/4	7
Drew Stevens	2/2	100%	57	3/4	9

Washington therefore scored two more points through field goals and extra points combined.

In a two-point game, those smaller scoring differences become meaningful.

Return Game Comparison

Seattle’s Rashid Shaheed handled both kickoff and punt-return duties.

He recorded:

• 2 kickoff returns for 63 yards
• 31.5-yard kickoff-return average
• 36-yard longest kickoff return
• 3 punt returns for 29 yards
• 9.7-yard punt-return average

Tory Horton added one kickoff return for 29 yards.

Washington’s kickoff returners were also productive.

Luke McCaffrey returned three kicks for 90 yards, averaging 30 yards per return. Rachaad White added one 38-yard return.

Washington finished with 128 kickoff-return yards compared with Seattle’s 92.

That gave Washington another field-position advantage, even though neither team returned a kickoff or punt for a touchdown.

Punting Numbers Favor Washington in Average and Placement

Seattle punter Michael Dickson punted four times for 174 yards, averaging 43.5 yards per punt.

Washington’s Tress Way punted seven times for 343 yards, averaging 49.0 yards per punt.

Way also placed three punts inside the 20-yard line.

Punter	Punts	Yards	Average	Long	Inside 20
Michael Dickson	4	174	43.5	52	0
Tress Way	7	343	49.0	60	3

Washington’s seven punts indicate that its offense had difficulty sustaining drives at times.

Yet the strong punting average and three inside-20 placements helped limit Seattle’s field position on those possessions.

Why Seattle Lost Despite 393 Passing Yards

This is the central question behind the seahawks vs washington commanders match player stats.

Seattle’s passing production was clearly superior.

Darnold threw for 379 yards and four touchdowns.

Smith-Njigba produced 128 receiving yards and two touchdowns.

Seattle finished with 393 passing yards.

So how did Washington win?

The answer is that total yardage is only one part of the game.

1. Turnovers

Seattle threw two interceptions.

Washington threw none.

One Washington interception became a 50-yard touchdown.

2. Rushing Balance

Washington rushed for 82 yards.

Seattle rushed for only 44.

The difference was 38 rushing yards.

3. Defensive Takeaways

Washington generated two interceptions.

Seattle generated none.

4. Defensive Scoring

Washington’s defense scored one touchdown.

Seattle’s defense scored zero.

5. Kicking Production

Washington made two field goals.

Seattle made one.

The result was therefore not a simple case of one offense outperforming another.

It was a game in which Seattle’s passing attack generated extraordinary volume while Washington created more value from turnovers and complementary football.

The Biggest Statistical Contrast

The most striking contrast is the relationship between yardage and scoring.

Seattle:

• 393 passing yards
• 44 rushing yards
• 437 total offensive yards
• 31 points

Washington:

• 176 passing yards
• 82 rushing yards
• 258 total offensive yards
• 33 points

Based on the supplied passing and rushing totals, Seattle produced approximately 179 more yards of total offense.

Yet Washington scored two more points.

That is a classic example of why raw yardage does not automatically determine the winner.

Seattle’s offense moved the ball effectively, but its two interceptions created opportunities for Washington.

The Commanders did not need to match Seattle’s offensive yardage when their defense could create short scoring paths.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Seattle

Seattle’s numbers point toward an offense with significant passing capability but limited rushing support in this particular matchup.

The 393 passing yards were excellent.

The 44 rushing yards were not.

That created an unusually high dependence on Darnold.

The Seahawks also had several productive pass catchers, which suggests the passing game was not simply one-dimensional.

Smith-Njigba led the way, but Barner, Horton, Holani, Kupp, Russell, Shaheed, Saubert, and Price all contributed receptions.

The major concern in the box score is therefore not receiving depth. It is the inability to generate enough rushing production and the failure to protect the football.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Washington

Washington’s statistical profile was almost the opposite.

The Commanders did not generate much passing yardage, but Mariota threw three touchdowns without an interception.

The rushing attack produced 82 yards.

The defense created two interceptions.

Special teams added nine points from the kicker.

The Commanders also generated strong return numbers.

Taken together, Washington received contributions from offense, defense, and special teams.

That is why the final score did not mirror the passing-yardage difference.

A Closer Look at Efficiency

Completion percentage provides another useful perspective.

Darnold completed 31 of 45 attempts, which works out to approximately 68.9%.

Mariota completed 19 of 31 attempts, approximately 61.3%.

Seattle therefore had a clear advantage in completion volume and passing yardage.

But Washington’s quarterback had zero interceptions.

Seattle’s two interceptions reduced the value of its otherwise impressive completion rate.

This is an important lesson when interpreting quarterback statistics. Completion percentage and yardage describe how much an offense produced through the air. Turnovers describe how effectively that production translated into possession value.

Both need to be considered.

The Importance of Third-Down and Red-Zone Context

The supplied data do not include complete third-down conversion or red-zone efficiency numbers, so those categories should not be invented or estimated.

That limitation matters for anyone conducting a deeper statistical analysis.

The available box score does establish that Seattle scored four offensive touchdowns through the passing game and that Washington scored three passing touchdowns plus a defensive touchdown.

It also shows that Washington made two field goals.

Those scoring details provide enough evidence to understand the broad scoring pattern without assuming unreported conversion rates.

For a published article, this is preferable to filling gaps with unsupported statistics.

Fumbles and Ball Security

Seattle recorded two team fumbles.

Jadarian Price was charged with one fumble and lost it.

Eric Saubert recorded one fumble but recovered it.

Washington had no fumbles and recovered one fumble.

This adds another layer to Seattle’s ball-security problems.

Although the two interceptions were the clearest turnover figures, Seattle also had a lost fumble.

The supplied team statistics therefore show three Seattle turnovers in total when interceptions and the lost fumble are combined.

Washington did not lose a fumble.

That makes the turnover difference even more significant than simply comparing interceptions.

A Player-by-Player Statistical Summary

Seattle Seahawks

Sam Darnold: 31 completions on 45 attempts, 379 yards, four touchdowns, two interceptions, 105.7 passer rating.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba: 10 receptions, 128 yards, two touchdowns, 14 targets.

AJ Barner: Five receptions, 69 yards, nine targets.

Tory Horton: Three receptions, 48 yards.

George Holani: Five receptions for 48 receiving yards and 10 rushing yards.

Cooper Kupp: Four receptions, 46 yards, one touchdown.

Jadarian Price: 15 rushing yards and seven receiving yards, with one lost fumble.

Drake Thomas: Nine tackles.

Ernest Jones IV: Eight tackles.

DeMarcus Lawrence: Five tackles, one tackle for loss, three quarterback hits.

Leonard Williams: Three tackles, one sack, two tackles for loss, three quarterback hits.

Derick Hall: Four tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, two quarterback hits.

Jason Myers: One field goal on one attempt, including a 57-yard make, plus four extra points.

Washington Commanders

Marcus Mariota: 19 completions on 31 attempts, 183 listed passing yards, three touchdowns, no interceptions.

Terry McLaurin: Six receptions, 77 yards, one touchdown.

Stefon Diggs: Four receptions, 33 yards.

Treylon Burks: Two receptions, 13 yards, one touchdown.

Rachaad White: Eight carries for 35 yards and one receiving touchdown, plus a 38-yard kickoff return.

Jacory Croskey-Merritt: 19 carries for 36 yards.

Kain Medrano: Five tackles, one interception, one pass defended, and a 50-yard interception touchdown.

Sonny Styles: Five tackles, one interception, two passes defended.

Amik Robertson: Six tackles and four passes defended.

Jeremy Reaves: Seven tackles and one pass defended.

Drew Stevens: Two field goals on two attempts and three extra points.

Key Takeaways From the Matchup

The statistical story can be condensed into several major observations.

Seattle Won the Passing-Yardage Battle

Seattle produced 393 passing yards compared with Washington’s 176.

That was the biggest offensive statistical advantage in the game.

Washington Won the Turnover Battle

Washington recorded two interceptions and no interceptions thrown.

Seattle threw two interceptions and also lost a fumble.

Smith-Njigba Was Seattle’s Primary Offensive Weapon

His 128 receiving yards and two touchdowns made him the most productive Seattle pass catcher.

McLaurin Led Washington’s Receiving Corps

McLaurin posted 77 yards and a touchdown, giving Washington its most productive receiving performance.

Seattle’s Running Game Was Limited

The Seahawks averaged only 2.4 yards per rushing attempt and finished with 44 rushing yards.

Washington Had More Offensive Balance

The Commanders combined 176 passing yards with 82 rushing yards.

Defensive Scoring Changed the Equation

Kain Medrano’s 50-yard pick-six gave Washington a touchdown without requiring an offensive drive.

Special Teams Contributed to the Margin

Washington made two field goals and Seattle made one.

How to Read These Stats Without Overreacting

One of the biggest mistakes in football analysis is treating a single box score as a complete explanation of a team’s quality.

The Seahawks generated 437 combined rushing and passing yards according to the supplied figures, while Washington generated 258.

That does not mean Seattle’s offense was flawless, nor does it mean Washington’s offense was ineffective.

The game demonstrates that production must be interpreted in context.

A team can move the ball efficiently and still lose if it turns the ball over at critical moments.

Likewise, a team can struggle to generate yardage but remain competitive through defensive takeaways, field position, kicking, and ball security.

That is exactly why the seahawks vs washington commanders match player stats are more informative when examined together rather than as isolated player lines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Seahawks and Commanders?

The Washington Commanders defeated the Seattle Seahawks 33-31 on September 27, 2026, during Week 3 of the NFL season.

How many yards did Sam Darnold throw for?

Sam Darnold completed 31 of 45 passes for 379 yards, four touchdowns, and two interceptions.

Who led the Seahawks in receiving?

Jaxon Smith-Njigba led Seattle with 10 receptions for 128 yards and two touchdowns on 14 targets.

Who led Washington in receiving?

Terry McLaurin led Washington with six receptions for 77 yards and one touchdown.

How many interceptions did Washington record?

Washington recorded two interceptions. Kain Medrano returned one interception 50 yards for a touchdown, while Sonny Styles recorded the other.

Why did Seattle lose despite throwing for 393 team passing yards?

Seattle’s high passing output was offset by two interceptions, a lost fumble, only 44 rushing yards, and Washington’s defensive touchdown and field-goal production.

Conclusion

The seahawks vs washington commanders match player stats show a game that cannot be explained by passing yardage alone.

Seattle’s offense was highly productive through the air. Sam Darnold threw for 379 yards and four touchdowns, while Jaxon Smith-Njigba produced 128 receiving yards and two touchdowns. Several other Seattle receivers also made meaningful contributions.

Washington, however, built its 33-31 victory through a different statistical formula. Marcus Mariota avoided interceptions, the rushing game produced 82 yards, the defense intercepted Darnold twice, Kain Medrano returned an interception for a touchdown, and Drew Stevens converted two field goals.

The biggest difference was therefore not raw offensive yardage. It was how each team converted its opportunities into points while protecting possession.

Seattle finished with far more passing yardage, but Washington finished with more points. That contrast makes this Week 3 matchup particularly useful for understanding NFL game statistics. A box score becomes much more meaningful when passing, rushing, turnovers, defensive impact, special teams, and scoring efficiency are considered together.

For readers studying player performance, the standout individual numbers were Darnold’s 379 passing yards, Smith-Njigba’s 128 receiving yards and two touchdowns, McLaurin’s 77 receiving yards and touchdown, and Medrano’s game-changing interception return.

Ultimately, the 33-31 score reflects a game decided by complementary football and turnover impact as much as by offensive production.