76ers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs boston celtics match player stats from May 1, 2026, highlight Philadelphia’s 106-93 victory over Boston in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference first-round playoffs. Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 30 points, while Paul George added 23 points and Joel Embiid contributed 19 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists. Philadelphia’s improved shooting efficiency, stronger ball movement, and ability to capitalize on free throws helped the team secure a 13-point win. Boston struggled to maintain its scoring rhythm after halftime, particularly in the third quarter, when Philadelphia extended its advantage.
This game provides a useful example of how individual performances and team execution combine to shape a playoff result. The final score tells only part of the story. Shooting percentages, rebounding, turnovers, defensive stops, and contributions from supporting players help explain why Philadelphia controlled much of the second half. The following breakdown examines the supplied ESPN box-score data, compares both teams, and explains the most important statistical differences.
Data note: The supplied game information contains an inconsistency in its playoff series description. It lists Game 6 as a 106-93 Philadelphia win and also provides a Game 7 result dated May 3. The player and team statistics below are presented as supplied, rather than independently verified historical records.
76ers vs boston celtics match player stats: Game Overview
The May 1 matchup ended with Philadelphia winning 106-93 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The reported attendance was 19,746. Boston entered the game with a listed 56-26 regular-season record, while Philadelphia’s listed record was 45-37.
The 76ers finished with better shooting percentages, more assists, fewer turnovers, and a slight rebounding advantage. These differences helped them maintain control despite Boston’s stronger opening quarter.
| Game detail | Information |
| Matchup | Philadelphia 76ers vs. Boston Celtics |
| Date | May 1, 2026 |
| Competition | NBA Eastern Conference First Round |
| Game number | Game 6 |
| Venue | Xfinity Mobile Arena |
| Final score | 76ers 106, Celtics 93 |
| Winning margin | Philadelphia by 13 points |
| Attendance | 19,746 |
| Philadelphia field-goal percentage | 44% |
| Boston field-goal percentage | 42% |
| Philadelphia three-point percentage | 33% |
| Boston three-point percentage | 29% |
Philadelphia’s 13-point victory reflected more than a small difference in shooting accuracy. The 76ers also converted their free throws at a much higher rate and committed fewer turnovers. Those advantages allowed them to build a lead without depending entirely on three-point shooting.
Boston remained competitive in the opening quarter. However, its scoring declined considerably in the third period, making a comeback more difficult.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown
The scoring pattern reveals when Philadelphia established control and how Boston responded.
| Quarter | Philadelphia 76ers | Boston Celtics | Quarter winner |
| First quarter | 20 | 23 | Boston |
| Second quarter | 38 | 26 | Philadelphia |
| Third quarter | 24 | 14 | Philadelphia |
| Fourth quarter | 24 | 30 | Boston |
| Final score | 106 | 93 | Philadelphia |
First quarter: Boston starts ahead
Boston scored 23 points in the opening quarter, compared with Philadelphia’s 20. The Celtics established an early three-point advantage and prevented the home team from immediately dictating the pace.
Philadelphia did not need to win every quarter to control the game. Instead, the 76ers responded by improving their offensive production in the second period.
Second quarter: Philadelphia changes the momentum
The second quarter was a major turning point. Philadelphia scored 38 points, while Boston managed 26. That 12-point difference erased the Celtics’ early lead and gave the 76ers a nine-point halftime advantage.
Philadelphia’s eventual success was supported by balanced scoring and efficient free-throw shooting. Its lead did not depend on one player alone, even though Maxey became the leading scorer.
Third quarter: Defense creates separation
Philadelphia outscored Boston 24-14 in the third quarter. This was another important stretch because Boston scored only 14 points, its lowest output of the game.
The 76ers entered the fourth quarter with a substantial advantage. By limiting Boston’s scoring opportunities and protecting their own lead, they reduced the pressure on their offense late in the game.
Fourth quarter: Boston responds, but the deficit remains
Boston scored 30 points in the final quarter, six more than Philadelphia. The Celtics improved their offensive output, but the earlier deficit proved too large to overcome.
The fourth-quarter numbers show why a late scoring surge does not always produce a comeback. Teams must also limit the opponent’s scoring while making up lost ground. Boston improved one side of that equation but could not reverse the overall result.
Philadelphia 76ers Player Statistics
Philadelphia’s starting lineup featured Paul George, Joel Embiid, Kelly Oubre Jr., Tyrese Maxey, and VJ Edgecombe. According to the supplied statistics, these players provided scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and defensive contributions.
Complete 76ers player stat leaders
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals | Blocks |
| Tyrese Maxey | 30 | 2 | 5 | 2 | Not specified |
| Paul George | 23 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Joel Embiid | 19 | 10 | 8 | 1 | Not specified |
| Kelly Oubre Jr. | 14 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| VJ Edgecombe | 14 | 8 | 3 | Not specified | 2 |
The supplied data does not specify every player’s complete defensive statistics. Unlisted values are not assumed to be zero.
Tyrese Maxey: Philadelphia’s leading scorer
Maxey led all listed players with 30 points. He also recorded five assists, two rebounds, and two steals.
His scoring output represented a major part of Philadelphia’s offensive production. A 30-point performance can put sustained pressure on a defense because opponents must account for the scorer across multiple possessions.
Maxey’s five assists also matter. They indicate that his recorded contribution extended beyond scoring, although assists alone cannot show the quality of every possession or the defensive attention he attracted.
His two steals added defensive value by recording possessions in which he directly took the ball away from Boston. Combined with his scoring, those contributions made him Philadelphia’s leading statistical performer in the supplied box score.
Paul George: A major secondary scoring contribution
George finished with 23 points, four rebounds, three assists, two steals, and one block. His scoring placed him second among Philadelphia’s listed players.
The value of George’s performance becomes clearer when considered alongside Maxey’s output. Philadelphia had two players score at least 23 points, reducing its dependence on a single offensive option.
George also recorded both steals and a block. Those numbers show activity on defense, although they do not capture every contest, rotation, or defensive assignment.
His 23 points gave Philadelphia another reliable source of production in a game where team balance proved important.
Joel Embiid: Scoring, rebounding, and playmaking
Embiid recorded 19 points, 10 rebounds, eight assists, and one steal. His double-digit rebounding total led the 76ers, while his eight assists were the highest individual assist total listed for either team.
This combination makes his line especially notable. Embiid contributed to three central areas of basketball performance: scoring, recovering missed shots, and creating opportunities for teammates.
His 10 rebounds helped Philadelphia secure possessions after missed shots. His eight assists also show how a frontcourt player can contribute to offensive organization instead of operating only as a scorer near the basket.
A box score cannot fully explain the tactical details of his playmaking, such as which defensive rotations opened passing lanes. Nevertheless, the recorded numbers demonstrate that his influence extended well beyond his 19 points.
Kelly Oubre Jr.: Defensive activity and rebounding
Oubre finished with 14 points, nine rebounds, one assist, two steals, and two blocks. His nine rebounds were just one short of Embiid’s team-leading total.
Oubre’s line is an example of a player making contributions across several statistical categories. His scoring supported the starting lineup, while his rebounds helped Philadelphia compete for possession.
The two steals and two blocks also show that he recorded four defensive events that directly appear in the box score. These statistics do not measure all defensive work, but they offer evidence of his activity on that end of the court.
VJ Edgecombe: A balanced contribution
Edgecombe recorded 14 points, eight rebounds, three assists, and two blocks. His scoring matched Oubre’s total, while his eight rebounds added to Philadelphia’s work on the glass.
His three assists provided another source of ball movement. Meanwhile, two blocks added measurable rim-protection production to the team’s defensive effort.
The combination of 14 points and eight rebounds is useful when evaluating his contribution. He was not listed solely as a perimeter scorer; he also helped Philadelphia collect missed shots and recorded defensive stops.
Philadelphia’s bench contribution
Quentin Grimes recorded two points, three rebounds, and two assists in 22 minutes, according to the supplied data.
His scoring total was modest, but points alone do not represent a reserve player’s entire role. Rebounds and assists also contribute to possession control and offensive movement.
However, the available information does not provide a complete Philadelphia bench box score. It would therefore be inaccurate to conclude that Grimes was the team’s only meaningful reserve contributor or to compare the entire bench using this partial entry.
Boston Celtics Player Statistics
Boston’s listed starting lineup included Jayson Tatum, Sam Hauser, Neemias Queta, Derrick White, and Jaylen Brown. The supplied information identifies Brown as the team’s leading scorer, while Tatum and Queta shared the rebounding lead.
Key Celtics player stat leaders
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Additional information |
| Jaylen Brown | 18 | Not specified | Not specified | Boston’s top scorer |
| Jayson Tatum | Not specified | 11 | Not specified | Shared team rebounding lead |
| Neemias Queta | Not specified | 11 | Not specified | Shared team rebounding lead |
| Payton Pritchard | 14 | Not specified | 5 | Bench contributor, 36 minutes |
The supplied data does not include complete individual box-score lines for every Celtics player. This table therefore focuses on the available figures rather than filling missing statistics with estimates.
Jaylen Brown: Boston’s leading scorer
Brown scored 18 points, making him Boston’s leading scorer in the supplied data. His total was 12 points below Maxey’s 30-point performance.
That gap is one useful comparison between the teams. Philadelphia had a leading scorer who reached 30 points, while Boston’s highest recorded individual total was 18.
Still, one player’s scoring total cannot explain the full outcome. Boston’s shooting percentages, free-throw conversion, turnovers, and second-half scoring also shaped the result.
The difference between the leading scorers is best understood as one component of Philadelphia’s broader statistical advantage.
Jayson Tatum: Rebounding contribution
Tatum collected 11 rebounds, tying Queta for Boston’s highest recorded total in that category.
Rebounding matters because it determines which team gains possession after a missed field goal or free throw. Defensive rebounds can end an opponent’s possession, while offensive rebounds can create another scoring opportunity.
Boston finished with 46 total rebounds, two fewer than Philadelphia’s 48. Tatum’s 11 rebounds formed a substantial part of the Celtics’ overall rebounding effort.
His complete scoring and playmaking statistics were not included in the supplied summary, so his broader offensive contribution cannot be evaluated accurately from these figures alone.
Neemias Queta: Sharing the rebounding lead
Queta also recorded 11 rebounds. His contribution matched Tatum’s total and helped Boston remain competitive on the boards.
Boston finished with eight offensive rebounds and 38 defensive rebounds. The team therefore secured most of its rebounds on the defensive end, although the available figures do not identify how many individual rebounds each player collected in each category.
Queta’s 11 rebounds show his role in the team’s possession battle. However, rebounds alone cannot establish how effectively a player defended shots, protected the rim, or handled switching assignments.
Payton Pritchard: Production from the bench
Pritchard recorded 14 points and five assists in 36 minutes. His scoring matched the listed totals for Oubre and Edgecombe, while his five assists tied Maxey’s recorded assist count.
His contribution is important when assessing Boston’s supporting offense. A reserve player can provide both scoring and playmaking, helping a team maintain offensive structure when the starting lineup changes.
Pritchard’s 36 minutes also indicate substantial playing time. His role was therefore more extensive than a brief appearance from the bench.
Even so, the supplied statistics do not include his complete shooting breakdown or full defensive line. His efficiency cannot be established from points and assists alone.
Team Statistics Comparison
The team-level figures explain why Philadelphia won despite Boston finishing with a relatively close field-goal percentage.
| Statistical category | Philadelphia 76ers | Boston Celtics |
| Points | 106 | 93 |
| Field goals made | 39 | 36 |
| Field goals attempted | 89 | 86 |
| Field-goal percentage | 44% | 42% |
| Three-pointers made | 11 | 12 |
| Three-pointers attempted | 33 | 41 |
| Three-point percentage | 33% | 29% |
| Free throws made | 17 | 9 |
| Free throws attempted | 19 | 16 |
| Free-throw percentage | 89% | 56% |
| Total rebounds | 48 | 46 |
| Offensive rebounds | 8 | 8 |
| Defensive rebounds | 40 | 38 |
| Assists | 22 | 18 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 13 |
| Steals | 7 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 3 |
| Personal fouls | 15 | 18 |
Percentages are reported as supplied and rounded to whole numbers.
Field-goal efficiency
Philadelphia made 39 of 89 field-goal attempts, while Boston converted 36 of 86. The 76ers therefore made three more field goals despite taking only three additional attempts.
The difference in reported field-goal percentage was two percentage points. That is a modest gap, but it worked alongside Philadelphia’s advantages in other areas.
Field-goal percentage measures the share of field-goal attempts that become baskets. It does not account for the additional value of three-pointers compared with two-pointers, so it should not be used as the only measure of shooting efficiency.
Three-point shooting
Boston made 12 of 41 three-point attempts, compared with Philadelphia’s 11 of 33.
Boston made one more three-pointer, but the Celtics attempted eight more shots from beyond the arc. Philadelphia’s reported three-point percentage was 33%, compared with Boston’s 29%.
This distinction illustrates why made shots and efficiency need to be considered together. Boston produced more three-pointers, but its greater volume did not translate into a higher percentage or enough total points to overcome Philadelphia’s other advantages.
Three-point shooting can quickly change a basketball game, but a high attempt total is not automatically a sign of better offensive performance. Shot quality, defensive pressure, and conversion rate all matter.
Free-throw shooting: A significant difference
Philadelphia made 17 of 19 free throws, converting approximately 89%. Boston made nine of 16, or approximately 56%.
The 76ers scored eight more points from the free-throw line. That difference accounted for a substantial portion of the 13-point final margin.
Free throws are particularly important in close games because they provide scoring opportunities without requiring a field-goal attempt. Converting them consistently can help a team build a lead even when its perimeter shooting is not exceptional.
Philadelphia’s advantage was not simply that it attempted three more free throws. It also converted a much greater share of its opportunities.
The available statistics do not establish why each free throw was awarded, so it would be inappropriate to attribute the entire difference to a specific officiating pattern or defensive mistake.
Rebounding: Philadelphia wins the possession battle narrowly
Philadelphia collected 48 total rebounds, compared with Boston’s 46. Both teams recorded eight offensive rebounds, while the 76ers had two more defensive rebounds.
The overall difference was small, but defensive rebounding can be important for protecting a lead. When a team secures a defensive rebound, it prevents the opponent from extending its possession through a missed-shot recovery.
Philadelphia’s 40 defensive rebounds helped it finish possessions, while Boston’s 38 showed that the Celtics also collected a large share of available defensive boards.
The numbers suggest a slight Philadelphia advantage rather than overwhelming dominance on the glass.
Assists and ball movement
Philadelphia recorded 22 assists, four more than Boston’s 18.
Assists provide one measure of how frequently made field goals follow a teammate’s pass. A higher total can indicate effective passing and coordinated offensive play, although it does not capture every form of ball movement.
Embiid’s eight assists were particularly notable. His total represented more than one-third of Philadelphia’s 22 assists, highlighting his role as a playmaker within the supplied figures.
Boston’s 18 assists still represent meaningful team passing. The difference should not be interpreted as proof that every Philadelphia possession was better organized, but it supports the conclusion that the 76ers recorded more assisted baskets.
Turnovers: Protecting possessions
Philadelphia committed 10 turnovers, while Boston committed 13. The Celtics therefore recorded three additional turnovers.
Turnovers matter because they end offensive possessions without a shot being attempted. They can also give the opposing team opportunities to score before the defense is organized.
The difference is especially relevant in a game decided by 13 points. Philadelphia combined fewer turnovers with more assists, a pattern consistent with stronger possession management.
However, the supplied team statistics do not specify how many points each team scored directly after turnovers. The exact scoring impact of these mistakes cannot be calculated from the summary alone.
Defensive production
Both teams recorded seven steals, so neither had an advantage in the total number of steals. Philadelphia did, however, record six blocks compared with Boston’s three.
Blocks are only one part of defensive performance. Good positioning, contested shots, communication, and forcing difficult attempts may not appear directly in a box score.
Even with that limitation, Philadelphia’s three-block advantage provides one measurable difference between the teams. Combined with fewer turnovers allowed and a lower Boston scoring output in the third quarter, it supports the broader picture of an effective defensive performance.
Why the 76ers Won the Game
Philadelphia’s victory can be explained through several connected factors rather than a single standout statistic. Maxey’s scoring led the way, but the team also benefited from Embiid’s playmaking, George’s scoring support, efficient free throws, and better possession management.
1. Philadelphia had the more productive leading scorer
Maxey’s 30 points exceeded Brown’s 18 by 12 points. That comparison gave Philadelphia a clear advantage among the two teams’ leading scorers.
A leading scorer can influence a game in more than one way. Consistent scoring forces opponents to devote defensive attention to that player, potentially creating opportunities for teammates. However, the supplied box score does not quantify how many points Philadelphia generated from defensive adjustments against Maxey.
What the data establishes is straightforward: Maxey provided the highest individual scoring total in the supplied statistics, and Philadelphia won by 13 points.
2. The 76ers had several productive starters
George scored 23 points, Embiid added 19, and Oubre and Edgecombe each recorded 14.
Together, these five listed Philadelphia starters accounted for 100 points. This total comes from adding their individual scoring figures: 30, 23, 19, 14, and 14.
That calculation highlights the starting lineup’s contribution, although the available summary does not provide a complete scoring breakdown for every Philadelphia reserve. It should not be interpreted as the team’s full scoring distribution.
The broader point is that Philadelphia had several players capable of contributing meaningful scoring. Boston’s leading scorer had 18 points, while Philadelphia’s next three listed starters each reached at least 14.
3. Free throws created a valuable scoring advantage
Philadelphia’s 17 successful free throws produced eight more points than Boston’s nine made free throws.
That difference was important because the Celtics made more three-pointers. Philadelphia did not need to dominate every shooting category to win; it generated points through a combination of field goals, three-pointers, and free throws.
The 76ers’ 89% free-throw conversion rate also limited wasted opportunities at the line. Boston’s 56% rate meant that nearly half of its attempted free throws did not become points.
For analysts reviewing a box score, this is a useful reminder to evaluate the full scoring breakdown rather than focusing exclusively on three-point totals.
4. Philadelphia made better use of possessions
The 76ers recorded 22 assists and 10 turnovers. Boston finished with 18 assists and 13 turnovers.
One simple descriptive measure is the assist-to-turnover ratio. Philadelphia’s ratio was 2.2, calculated by dividing 22 assists by 10 turnovers. Boston’s was approximately 1.38, calculated by dividing 18 assists by 13 turnovers.
This measure suggests that Philadelphia recorded more assists relative to its turnovers. It is not a complete measure of offensive efficiency because it does not account for shot quality, offensive rebounds, free throws, or the context of each possession.
Still, the comparison reinforces the value of Philadelphia’s ball security and passing in this game.
5. The third quarter helped protect the lead
Philadelphia outscored Boston 24-14 in the third quarter. That 10-point advantage was especially important after the 76ers had already taken control in the second period.
Boston’s fourth-quarter response showed that the Celtics could still generate offense. They scored 30 points in the final quarter, but Philadelphia also scored 24 and retained its lead.
The sequence demonstrates how a strong middle portion of a game can determine the outcome. A team does not need to win every quarter if it creates a sufficiently large advantage earlier and avoids a late collapse.
Statistical Takeaways for Basketball Fans
The numbers from this matchup provide several useful lessons for anyone studying NBA box scores.
A close shooting percentage does not mean an equally close performance
Philadelphia shot 44% from the field, compared with Boston’s 42%. A two-percentage-point difference might appear small, but field-goal percentage is only one part of a team’s scoring profile.
The 76ers also converted more free throws, recorded more assists, and committed fewer turnovers. These differences contributed to a broader advantage that the field-goal percentages alone would not fully explain.
Rebounds and turnovers tell different stories
Philadelphia’s two-rebound advantage was relatively small. The three-turnover advantage was also modest in isolation.
However, both categories influence possession control. Rebounds can preserve or end possessions, while turnovers eliminate offensive opportunities before a shot is taken.
The best analysis considers how these categories work together instead of treating any one statistic as a complete explanation.
Individual scoring should be evaluated alongside team production
Maxey’s 30 points were the most prominent individual figure, but George’s 23 points and Embiid’s 19 points were also important.
A team with multiple productive scorers can distribute offensive responsibility. That balance can make it harder for an opponent to rely on one defensive matchup to control the game.
At the same time, points alone cannot establish a player’s efficiency. A full evaluation would also examine field-goal attempts, three-point attempts, free throws, minutes played, and other available statistics.
Box-score statistics have limits
Traditional box scores are useful, but they do not tell the whole story.
For example, the supplied summary does not include complete individual shooting splits for every player. It also does not provide a full possession-by-possession explanation of the second-quarter scoring surge.
For a deeper analysis, readers can consult the ESPN game box score, which is the supplied source for the matchup data. Individual lines and game details should be checked against the original record before publication, particularly because the supplied playoff series information contains an inconsistency.
How to Read Player Statistics Correctly
Understanding the main categories makes it easier to compare players without drawing unsupported conclusions.
Points
Points show how much a player scored through field goals and free throws. They provide a direct measure of scoring output, but they do not show how many attempts were required.
For example, Maxey’s 30 points establish that he led the supplied scoring figures. Without his complete shooting totals, however, those points alone do not establish his exact scoring efficiency.
Rebounds
Rebounds are divided into offensive and defensive rebounds. Offensive rebounds give a team another opportunity to score after a missed shot. Defensive rebounds usually end the opponent’s possession.
Embiid’s 10 rebounds led Philadelphia, while Tatum and Queta each recorded 11 for Boston. These totals describe individual rebounding production, but they do not reveal the full context of each rebound or the quality of the player’s positioning.
Assists
An assist is credited when a pass directly leads to a made basket under the official scoring rules. It is useful for assessing playmaking, although not every effective pass results in an assist.
Embiid’s eight assists led the supplied individual totals. Pritchard and Maxey each recorded five, demonstrating that several players contributed to creating baskets for teammates.
Steals and blocks
Steals record defensive plays in which a player takes possession of the ball from an opponent. Blocks record shots that a defender legally deflects or stops.
These statistics can highlight defensive activity, but they should not be used as the only measures of defensive quality. A player can defend effectively without recording either a steal or a block.
Turnovers
A turnover occurs when a team loses possession without completing a successful field-goal attempt. Turnovers can arise from inaccurate passes, offensive fouls, violations, or other mistakes.
Philadelphia’s 10 turnovers compared with Boston’s 13 suggest that the 76ers protected possession more effectively in the recorded game.
Shooting percentages
Field-goal percentage is calculated by dividing field goals made by field goals attempted. Three-point percentage applies the same calculation to attempts from beyond the arc, while free-throw percentage measures successful free throws.
These percentages allow readers to compare accuracy across different numbers of attempts. They are most useful when considered alongside shot volume and the points produced by each type of shot.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the 76ers vs. Boston Celtics game on May 1, 2026?
The supplied game data lists a 106-93 victory for the Philadelphia 76ers over the Boston Celtics. Philadelphia won by 13 points at Xfinity Mobile Arena.
2. Who scored the most points in the matchup?
Tyrese Maxey was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 30 points. Boston’s leading scorer was Jaylen Brown, who recorded 18 points according to the supplied data.
3. Which player recorded the most rebounds?
Jayson Tatum and Neemias Queta shared Boston’s rebounding lead with 11 each. Joel Embiid led Philadelphia with 10 rebounds.
4. How many assists did Joel Embiid record?
Embiid recorded eight assists, the highest individual assist total listed in the supplied statistics. He also contributed 19 points and 10 rebounds.
5. Which team shot better from the free-throw line?
Philadelphia shot approximately 89%, making 17 of 19 attempts. Boston shot approximately 56%, making nine of 16 attempts. Philadelphia scored eight more points from the free-throw line.
6. What were the biggest statistical differences between the teams?
Philadelphia recorded more points, a higher field-goal percentage, more assists, fewer turnovers, two additional rebounds, and three more blocks. Boston made one more three-pointer, but its lower free-throw conversion rate and weaker third-quarter scoring contributed to the final difference.
Conclusion
The supplied 76ers vs boston celtics match player stats show Philadelphia winning 106-93 through a combination of individual scoring and stronger team execution. Maxey led the 76ers with 30 points, George added 23, and Embiid contributed 19 points, 10 rebounds, and eight assists. These performances gave Philadelphia several sources of offensive production.
The team comparison also reveals important differences beyond scoring. Philadelphia made 17 free throws, recorded 22 assists, committed 10 turnovers, and collected 48 rebounds. Boston made nine free throws, recorded 18 assists, committed 13 turnovers, and collected 46 rebounds. The 76ers also outscored the Celtics by 10 points in the third quarter, helping them protect their lead.
Boston’s 12 three-pointers exceeded Philadelphia’s 11, but that advantage was not enough to offset the 76ers’ stronger free-throw conversion and more efficient overall possession management. Together, the figures provide a detailed picture of the reported result while showing why a complete box-score comparison is more informative than the final score alone.
The supplied data should still be checked against the original game record before publication because its series-status details are inconsistent.
